125:
will bear with me. My rationale was based on the article itself, which states that
Worcester Park post town does indeed include parts of Surrey but Worcester Park ward is entirely within Greater London. If this is reason to include the article in Wikiprokect Surrey then perhaps we should include Aldershot as well? If, however, the situation is more complicated then it would be very useful to have sources quoted in the article.
177:
88:
256:, so I would like to enlist your help. I am reactivating the project and have rewritten a number of the pages, and done an overall restyle. I am also looking at defining some general standards for importance, and also general guidelines with regards to what should ideally be present in different types of articles to be located here
124:
Thankyou for your vigilance. I have been altering many WPSurrey banners (chiefly altering class and importance) in order to help define the scope of
Wikiproject Surrey. It is inevitable that in these many edits I will make some decisions that require more thought and discussion, and I hope that you
285:
I've refounded
Knowledge:Wikiproject Surrey and I saw you were a member of Knowledge:Wikiproject Surrey. I was wondering, as you are a on the Participants List weather on not you would like to help improve more Surrey articles and make Knowledge:Wikiproject Surrey and active Wikiproject again.
147:
but also definitive. Worcester Park as an article suffered in the past from almost edit wars over the London/Surrey elements. Pointless, naturally. A substantial part is in the
Borough of Epsom and Ewell, demonstrably Surrey.
374:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
257:
199:
207:
196:-related articles on Knowledge. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits within the scope of the project. You may wish to visit the:
224:
109:
Worcester Park, something that is abundantly clear from public documents.. What was your rationale for removing it form
Wikiproject Surrey, please?
215:
143:
The sources for
Worcester Park are the boundary maps. I haven't checked whether they are in the article or not, but they are not only meeting
399:
268:, and any other input you could give to the project would be fantastic. If you have any questions, reply here, I am watching :) Thanks,
261:
231:
395:
346:
48:
26:
184:
166:
43:
386:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
391:
53:
220:, to help out with assessing articles for the project or to request an article be assessed by another editor.
338:
319:
33:
22:
189:
60:
176:
64:
387:
76:
68:
326:
265:
153:
114:
38:
29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
289:
I hope you will come and help make
Knowledge: Wikiproject Surrey an active Wikiproject again.
75:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
363:
354:
307:
297:
94:
383:
367:
253:
382:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
212:, to help clear the list of requested new surrey related articles or to add new requests.
379:
371:
375:
149:
110:
293:
144:
126:
269:
238:
87:
79:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place
193:
403:
301:
272:
241:
223:
If you plan to contribute to the project please add yourself to the
157:
134:
118:
72:
370:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Knowledge
252:
Hi I noticed you have been quite active recently with regards to
171:
86:
306:
P.S. Either reply or
Knowledge:Wikiproject Surrey on my
329:
just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
260:. I think the guidelines for importance you posted on
264:
for importance are good, so I will whack these into
362:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
204:, for help with writing surrey related articles.
258:Knowledge:WikiProject_Surrey/Article_guidelines
337:To reply, leave a comment on Kieranian2001's
182:Hello Ginyild. You have been invited to join
8:
105:The boundary between London and Surrey runs
59:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
93:Hello. Please don't forget to provide an
83:before the question. Again, welcome!
314:A page you started has been reviewed!
7:
14:
388:review the candidates' statements
262:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Surrey
175:
101:But Worcester Park IS in Surrey
394:. For the Election committee,
364:Arbitration Committee election
355:ArbCom elections are now open!
1:
404:13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
97:. Thanks, and happy editing.
34:The five pillars of Knowledge
278:Knowledge:Wikiproject Surrey
158:21:29, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
135:18:58, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
119:18:31, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
49:How to write a great article
25:to Knowledge! Thank you for
390:and submit your choices on
227:. You may also like to add
209:Article Requests Department
419:
396:MediaWiki message delivery
273:17:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
242:17:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
333:reviewed already tagged.
302:14:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
130:
320:Javelin dinghy (Europe)
232:User WikiProject Surrey
225:list of project members
192:dedicated to improving
335:
91:
368:Arbitration Committee
331:
217:Assessment Department
90:
318:Thanks for creating
21:Hello, Ginyild, and
372:arbitration process
77:Knowledge:Questions
384:arbitration policy
237:to your userpage.
201:Article guidelines
185:WikiProject Surrey
167:WikiProject Surrey
92:
44:How to edit a page
27:your contributions
350:
345:Learn more about
325:Knowledge editor
292:Thanks, pbl1998--
247:
246:
67:your messages on
410:
344:
235:
179:
172:
82:
69:discussion pages
418:
417:
413:
412:
411:
409:
408:
407:
392:the voting page
358:
316:
280:
229:
170:
103:
98:
80:
54:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
416:
414:
361:
357:
352:
315:
312:
279:
276:
249:
245:
244:
222:
221:
213:
205:
180:
169:
164:
163:
162:
161:
160:
138:
137:
102:
99:
85:
57:
56:
51:
46:
41:
36:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
415:
406:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
356:
353:
351:
348:
347:page curation
342:
340:
334:
330:
328:
327:Kieranian2001
323:
321:
313:
311:
309:
304:
303:
299:
295:
290:
287:
283:
277:
275:
274:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
250:
243:
240:
236:
233:
226:
219:
218:
214:
211:
210:
206:
203:
202:
198:
197:
195:
191:
187:
186:
181:
178:
174:
173:
168:
165:
159:
155:
151:
150:Fiddle Faddle
146:
142:
141:
140:
139:
136:
132:
128:
123:
122:
121:
120:
116:
112:
111:Fiddle Faddle
108:
100:
96:
89:
84:
78:
74:
70:
66:
62:
55:
52:
50:
47:
45:
42:
40:
37:
35:
32:
31:
30:
28:
24:
19:
18:
359:
343:
336:
332:
324:
322:, Ginyild!
317:
305:
291:
288:
284:
281:
251:
248:
228:
216:
208:
200:
183:
106:
104:
95:edit summary
58:
20:
16:
15:
266:WP:SURREY/A
190:WikiProject
71:using four
380:topic bans
81:{{helpme}}
61:Wikipedian
376:site bans
339:talk page
308:talk page
254:WP:SURREY
63:! Please
39:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
294:Pbl1998
127:Ginyild
107:through
23:welcome
366:. The
270:Glanis
239:Glanis
194:Surrey
73:tildes
145:WP:RS
400:talk
310:...
298:talk
282:Hi,
188:, a
154:talk
131:talk
115:talk
65:sign
360:Hi,
402:)
378:,
341:.
300:)
234:}}
230:{{
156:)
133:)
117:)
398:(
349:.
296:(
152:(
129:(
113:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
