Knowledge

User talk:Gnip

Source 📝

122:
will. When word came of the approaching standards of Wu Sangui (with Dorgon in the rear, so as to present to the Chinese as if a Chinese general alone was coming to their aid, not realizing the political maneuvering of Dorgon), Li had no choice BUT to flee. He was not in control of Beijing, it was in total chaos. That is worth mentioning. Had he had discipline amongst his ranks he might have had a chance at defending such a paramount position as the capital itself. It is important that readers understand this. Please, do not leave that out, I will expand later with proper sources. This is my second to last week of school, I will be doing MAJOR reconstruction to the Ming article afterwards. Thank you for your help. It is very much needed for such a hefty topic as a three century period of China.--
272:
artworks from the Sui/Tang Dynasties? I've also seen many Han stone reliefs; some reliefs provided on that page by Professor Todd are unquestionably from Han period tomb walls. However, the lack of wear-and-tear and lanky artistic style on the image in question does raise an eyebrow or two, I will admit. I'll need more evidence, though, before I am totally convinced that the images should be removed. Cheers!--
271:
Hi Gnip. Are you certain about this? Prof. Gary Lee Todd did not provide any sort of wall plaque describing the artwork, but he did place the image in a page specifically labeled as showing Chinese artwork from its inception up to the end of the Han Dynasty. Could you provide some sort of comparison
220:
That's all good. By the way, where does Sun Tzu's citation talk about the Tang? I checked the Sui-Tang section, there were no griffith citations. As to the equipment section, I was trying to give the reader an overview of the equipment of the Chinese army in late imperial times (etc., Song onwards),
204:
which is from your source. The Ming armies relied on gunpowder weapons to a great deal and developed them, while Manchus viewed gunpowder weapons (and new inventions/economic development in general) as a threat to their rule. This was a major reason for China's decline starting from the 17th century
121:
Of course you should note his final outcome, but leave the info about him fleeing Beijing, I will add to that. It is important. He was forced to flee Beijing because unlike Dorgon and Wu, had had no discipline and authority amongst his rag-tag ranks, who disobeyed his orders and pillaged the city at
328:
I'm not sure what you mean. I checked the sources and the last one was pretty specific that gunpowder bombs were thrown on catapults. Gunpowder bombs were called "thundercrash bombs" during this era, but I don't know why that should be important. I think I can help better if you clarify what you're
196:
limiting the use of firearms to a single centralized body of people specially trained and easily controlled, and keeping the production of weapons under direct state control, could be measures meant as much to rationalize the deployment of artillery in military campaigns as to prevent the
104:
I should have kept the fact that he was killed afterwards, didn't I? I can't remember if I did or not. The actual certain event of his death is somewhat hazy in historical records, if I recall reading a while back. Conflicting accounts of how he actually died after he fled
221:
but I guess that didn't work out. Maybe the sections should have different paragraphs dealing with different periods? Anyways, I am busy right now off wiki and can't help, but I welcome help from other editors. If you are really aching to work, there is also
387:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 344:
I'm going to create an article on how the Mongols adopted and transferred military technology, which was generally either from China or the Islamic world, seeing as they didn't pick anything up in Europe (they
188:
I have edited and changed the article somewhat. I am relatively inactive on wikipedia now, so if you have sources please expand the article with them. As to the Manchus' view on gunpowder weapons, see:
169:
Fancy seeing you again! Thanks for providing this quote on my talk page. It should be very useful indeed. I'll find a way to include it in the article. However, it is late, and I am off to bed for now.
313:. I've read before that Mongols used a type of catapult and/or rockets during their invasion of europe, but I'm not sure what they were called, all it said was that they were of Chinese design. 349:
pretty fast), compared to the over 30 year invasion of China. Sources mention some sort of hand pulled trebuchets hurling bombs and maybe some form of primitive rocket in use, but no cannon.
23: 147:, we will need more than just the title of the book in that citation you gave about Juan de Mendoca; I'll need actual page numbers for those if you still have the book 70: 412: 288:
I'm fairly convinced now! Thank you for the excellent links. I will prepare some replacement images for these reliefs by tonight. Cheers.--
222: 253:, so it is perhaps misleading to place it in the article, let alone the lead. I'll see if I can find a worthy replacement image.-- 408: 54: 44: 399:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
404: 27: 346: 59: 230: 210: 39: 34: 290: 274: 255: 172: 153: 124: 107: 66: 354: 318: 400: 77: 350: 314: 30:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 73:
on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
376: 367: 226: 206: 90: 396: 380: 395:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 392: 384: 310: 388: 49: 86: 200:
weaponry that might give potential Chinese rebels an edge against the Qing forces.
250: 144: 330: 383:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
416: 358: 322: 296: 280: 261: 234: 214: 178: 159: 130: 113: 94: 84:
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
375:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 225:, a GA I wrote, to work on. Thanks for your help! 311:Battle_of_Mohi#Usage_of_Gunpowder_and_Firearms 8: 65:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 347:bulldozed all of their European opponents 309:do you have any sources about this?- 7: 223:Economic history of China (pre-1911) 80:, ask me on my talk page, or place 14: 401:review the candidates' statements 184:Response China military history 407:. For the Election committee, 377:Arbitration Committee election 368:ArbCom elections are now open! 281:05:08, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 1: 417:13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 267:Government of the Han Dynasty 131:06:00, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 114:00:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 95:23:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 40:The five pillars of Knowledge 235:01:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 215:20:19, 13 January 2010 (UTC) 160:01:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 149:Late Imperial Chinese Armies 76:If you need help, check out 55:How to write a great article 403:and submit your choices on 337:) 5:43, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 297:19:39, 7 October 2010 (UTC) 197:proliferation of a type of 432: 409:MediaWiki message delivery 359:22:33, 9 August 2011 (UTC) 323:03:26, 31 July 2011 (UTC) 262:16:04, 19 July 2010 (UTC) 193:It stands to reason that 179:06:33, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 245:Actually, that picture 202: 381:Arbitration Committee 191: 24:welcome to Knowledge! 385:arbitration process 143:With your edits to 78:Knowledge:Questions 397:arbitration policy 295: 292:Pericles of Athens 279: 276:Pericles of Athens 260: 257:Pericles of Athens 177: 174:Pericles of Athens 158: 155:Pericles of Athens 151:on hand. Thanks.-- 129: 126:Pericles of Athens 112: 109:Pericles of Athens 45:How to edit a page 28:your contributions 289: 273: 254: 171: 165:Long time no see! 152: 123: 106: 22:Hello, Gnip, and 423: 293: 277: 258: 175: 156: 127: 110: 83: 431: 430: 426: 425: 424: 422: 421: 420: 405:the voting page 371: 307: 291: 275: 269: 256: 243: 186: 173: 167: 154: 141: 125: 108: 102: 97: 81: 60:Manual of Style 20: 12: 11: 5: 429: 427: 374: 370: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 339: 338: 329:trying to do. 306: 303: 302: 301: 300: 299: 268: 265: 242: 239: 238: 237: 185: 182: 166: 163: 140: 137: 136: 135: 134: 133: 101: 98: 71:sign your name 63: 62: 57: 52: 47: 42: 37: 26:Thank you for 19: 16: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 428: 419: 418: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 369: 366: 360: 356: 352: 348: 343: 342: 341: 340: 336: 332: 327: 326: 325: 324: 320: 316: 312: 304: 298: 294: 287: 286: 285: 284: 283: 282: 278: 266: 264: 263: 259: 252: 248: 240: 236: 232: 228: 224: 219: 218: 217: 216: 212: 208: 201: 198: 194: 190: 183: 181: 180: 176: 164: 162: 161: 157: 150: 146: 138: 132: 128: 120: 119: 118: 117: 116: 115: 111: 99: 96: 92: 88: 85: 79: 74: 72: 68: 61: 58: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 41: 38: 36: 33: 32: 31: 29: 25: 17: 372: 334: 308: 270: 246: 244: 227:Teeninvestor 207:Teeninvestor 203: 199: 195: 192: 187: 168: 148: 142: 103: 75: 64: 35:Introduction 21: 251:Huolongjing 241:Huolongjing 145:Huolongjing 393:topic bans 105:Beijing.-- 82:{{helpme}} 67:Wikipedian 50:Help pages 389:site bans 305:gunpowder 249:from the 170:Cheers.-- 69:! Please 205:onwards. 139:Hi again 18:Welcome! 351:DÜNGÁNÈ 315:DÜNGÁNÈ 87:Neo-Jay 379:. The 247:is not 413:talk 355:talk 335:talk 331:Gnip 319:talk 231:talk 211:talk 91:talk 373:Hi, 100:Yes 415:) 391:, 357:) 321:) 233:) 213:) 93:) 411:( 353:( 333:( 317:( 229:( 209:( 89:(

Index

welcome to Knowledge!
your contributions
Introduction
The five pillars of Knowledge
How to edit a page
Help pages
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign your name
Knowledge:Questions
Neo-Jay
talk
23:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Pericles of Athens
00:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Pericles of Athens
06:00, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Huolongjing
Pericles of Athens
01:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Pericles of Athens
06:33, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Teeninvestor
talk
20:19, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Economic history of China (pre-1911)
Teeninvestor
talk
01:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑