User talk:Graeme Bartlett/archive 13

4072:). So, at that point when, in August 2009, you deleted in good faith the Knowledge (XXG) files, they were indeed "unused", but normally they should have been in use, because they should never have been removed from the articles by the user. Ideally, that user's action would have been noticed and undone and the files put back into place in the articles. Unfortunately, apparently nobody noticed it between March (removal) and August (deletion) and the anomaly continued to this day. Anyways, better late than never. Now, Commons is currently in a process of deleting the non-free copies (yes, it did take time) and it will become even more necessary that we restore the Knowledge (XXG) files, so that the images can be in place in the articles. I think the copies on Commons will probably be deleted soon and it would be nice to have our Knowledge (XXG) images already back in place by then. 3011:

and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. andy (talk) 11:18, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

1014:

because I do not pay attention, but the file that I put there in the my request, there I have more than 15 mistakes and it was happened when I was just logged on Knowledge (XXG), and I did not know how was editing worked then. I really do not want to be there, because when someone wanted to see the history of that file and see that it was filled with all my mistakes, and because of that I really would like it to be deleted, and on the other hand, it is the history of uploaded file, not the actual article, so is possible with no problems to be deleted (this is

3389:

explanation of how it was created, so it is more an original presetation. And this is only original from that author, as they had published before. After reading the talk about the copyright and the notice text on the original web page I was happy that the copyright had been sorted out. That the low resolution image had been released as claimed. Since the name came from the UK in the first place it is fair enough to have UK information. If you think it a bias I would suggest you move the image lower in the article instead.

730:, citing that the same author probably contributed the original and Knowledge (XXG) text. I nominated it for deletion because there was no indication that the text was licensed suitably for use on Knowledge (XXG) (cc-by-sa-3.0 or equivalent), so I believe that you are in error in removing the speedy tag (unless you know of some permission the author granted that I don't know of). Instead of restoring the tag, I plan to list it for AfD for the same reason (lack of copyright info). 31: 3972: 3145: 2728: 2672: 1892: 984: 2902:

being considered. (People are more interested in studying each event rather than finding analogies between the different events.) To understand these rules one must know the historical events and then see the analogy. On the other hand, to require that someone else as well studies these rules first, and only then to have an article in Knowledge (XXG) - this seems not quite natural. Knowledge (XXG) is a way of diffusing knowledge after all.

3227: 3055: 1528: 1425: 1635: 2221: 2043: 2544: 2516: 3701:"Now the 'Lad of Lads' is starting to attract widespread genuine excitement within the music industry and beyond for he's fresh approach to POP/SOUL Music. Picton shows honest reflections of an artist well before his years or knowledge would know and his distinctive voice, confidence and charisma has had people already claiming he could be 'this generations 4068:), who also replaced them by links to copies that had been uploaded to Commons. Unfortunately, that user did so without regard for the fact that the images were not free and that, consequently, the copies that had been uploaded to Commons were there against the Commons policy and they would eventually get deleted from the Commons site (see for example 778: 2131: 2102: 1169: 2971:

corresponding triples of persons born in these years and having played in some sense analogous roles in history. He also considers such triples of years and the events that have taken place during them and comments on the character of the events. I tried to contact Kvasha via Internet, I'll see whether there will be an answer.

1023:

the file back, the first will disappear, but I was fooled, and I only want to that two files be erased completely. Sorry that I have so much stretch but since you told me that if I want to delete to tell you, and after all I want to be deleted, I really want if that's not a problem to you. Thank you again for everything.

2761:. I have posted an example photo in the thread of what I intend to upload for the fossils. All my images are similar. So if this one is okay, the rest would be too. I want to be extra careful about making sure there are no copyright problems before uploading a bunch of images and creating a major headache. 595:, we still can't put it on Knowledge (XXG) without it being CC-BY-SA, in public domain, or being explicitly donated. So it seems to me that unless/until we get the words donated, this has to be deleted/blanked. Is there some way I'm misinterpreting policy? I'll watch this page so you can reply here. 3616:

Hi, Graeme Bartlett! Because I couldn't find it in the Search Box, I was going to create the reference page you created before, when noticed that indeed existed in the resulting Search Page. I don't have any clue of why this can happen. Maybe the reference page is too new to have been indexed, or the

3388:

Hello Spinning Spark, The reason was that I came across it while looking at another Jones image with the same name that was a problem. The high level reason is that the article is actually improved by having that picture added. OR is allowed in images unlike text, and in this case there was also an

3361:

article? I am guessing that you think the copyright issue is resolved. I am inclined to remove it again: I agree with the original removal that it is OR from a source with no provenance; additionally, it is UK-centric in an article that already has too little world-wide coverage; has no scale so is

2901:

that it relies essentially on one source. About each of the historical events mentioned in the article the reader can consult Knowledge (XXG) and the sources therein. In this sense, the content of the article is verifiable. I am not aware of another source, where the rules mentioned in my article are

1039:

If you look at the talkpage you will see that it wasn't just copy off one page of the website, but the whole text is copied from various pages on the persons website. I realise that for small section of copyvio you just remove it but there doesn't appear to be anything salvageable in this (and I have

590:

I apologize if this comes off harsh, but your rational for removing the speedy deletion doesn't make any sense to me. First, why would we just accept someone's word that they are the owner of a copyrighted document, especially when the document is the property of an organization, not an individual?

550:

Dear Graeme Bartlett, I would like to have a serious explanation from you out of which reasons you've deleted the page about the theater group K3RN3L? I would like to know under whose authority you have done so; and I would like to know the exact technical, semantic or any other detail for your act?

288:

I was just trying to find out if you actually knew something about the notability. Anyway prods are for uncontroversial cases where there is likely to be little complaint by the majority of wikipedians, not for testing the water before an AfD or to slip things under the radar. Although I know this is

1870:

You declined this image upload request because the image was already available. However, they are different images, and the point is to illustrate that there are different versions available, which can be identified easily through the (subtle) differences. Could you please revisit your decision? THX

3526:

A broad reading of this suggests that it is inappropriate to use their content to provide information which could be used in a similar fashion to MySchool. This is why any link to the MySchool website immediately redirects to the splash page. Being that one of the criticisms about the leagues table

3194:

Thanks Graeme for making us a beautiful new logo :), but i had a concern, which i wanted to bring in your notice. The logo that I uploaded is the official logo of our college Tech fest and has been in use for last 8 years (since the time nimbus-tech fest started). I would request you to please look

3950:

Good day. Two questions. (1) You noted on my talk page that an image I uploaded has no copyright status. I can add this information but am not sure how. I looked at the copyright page (including templates such as PD-self but am still not clear. Can you advise? (2) Not to be a stickler but you used

3554:

Hello Graeme Bartlett, you recently flagged an image of Mattthew Skenandore I uploaded, I have the author's explicit approval to use his image. How can we verify this? The image is from a low-res film still taken many years ago, no higher resolution file exists. Also he has given me permission to

3010:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate

3006:

Speedy deletion nomination of John A. Ware A tag has been placed on John A. Ware, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG) for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user

1022:

page I do not really wanted to be deleted everything, I wanted only one file, and it's File:Clash2010Soundtrack.jpg, because it is the first file that I sent and that there is no previous version that was sent by someone else. There are actually two that file because I thought that maybe if I send

144:

Hello~ I'm a new one to use Wiki. Therefore I don't know much things on Wiki. I just wrote an article about a firm. I don't put an ad or promote it. I just get some information about its website and want to write something about its company to practice on Wiki. I'm sorry to bother you to delete my

3327:

Hi We creates a page for Toni Rowland who we manage and represent. This was quite some time ago and we need to update the relevantinformation. When I came to update the page I see it has had a special deletion due to content copyright. The content that was placed on the page is the same as on her

1013:

Thank you Graeme Bartlett, for paying attention to my request and set aside time to answer. For start, I sincerely doubt that I will become an administrator, with those who want the same, chances for me are horribly low, and I fully realize that we all make mistakes and sometimes I make a mistake

165:

page. Can I kindly request the restoration of the page? I disagree with you that it is/was advertising or promotion. Instead, it was only factual. Yes, the page was not that long but the main motivation for adding a page was not to promote the company but instead add the explanation for the term

3511:

In regards to the MySchool website, the problem isn't so much linking to it as using data from it. In response to the publication of the rankings of schools by SMH and others last year, ACARA tightened up its ToS and copyright statements. I am very concerned with Clause 12(c) of it's ToS, which

1270:

every futurist like David Pierce or Saul Kent or Keith Henson or Natasha Vita more did their own self promotion, there is nothing bad in this. We are very popular in our field. There is nothing bad in that. I am actually very popular on internet, it's just that I comment everything about me on

2488:

Just saw that you made my article about 'Rick Day' an orphan. I really appreciate it. I admire this photographer's work tremendously and I was surprised to not find a wiki page about him. I'm working on getting more sources and references about this photographer to make the article stronger.

1233:

Jonathan Despres is one of the best futurist in the world, the subject has a major impact on society and the future of humanity. This guy is as important as Saul Kent, Keith Henson, Luke Nosek, David Pearce or Natasha Vita-More. As popular and as useful as them. My job would have been to add

2970:

I have been looking at the book of Grigory Semyonovich Kvasha (cited now in my article) some years ago. Unfortunately, I did not buy it then (I didn't know that some day I would need it). It talks about triples of years of the Chinese calendar (I mentioned these triples in my article) and

3174:

i saw on your harry potter chronology AFD discussion, you say wea re here to make an encyclopedia in general and NOT to follow policy. i'll just tell you, that the policy is there for a reason. One of the main reasons why it's so strict its because we don't want this to become a FAN-site

2573:

Thank you for you prompt answer. There is just one thing that I did not understand (I am sorry for asking silly questions), what exactly I should do within one week time to move my article to "Chinese calendar and history". That is, where I should click etc. ZildarVPK

3362:

of little value as data; and the uploader has failed to take out an OTRS ticket or put a notice on his site despite being aware that this is a requirement for the best part of two months. Thought I ought to get your take on it first though, before doing anything.

3790:

I don't understand the comment there. I have already removed the discussion from the WP: page . Now I need to restore the discussion to the WT: page. Since you are the admin of record that deleted the WT: page, I need your approval to restore the page.

3403:

OR is not allowed in images (if you think it is, please point to policy). Of course a user can create an original artwork, but what that does not allow one to do is use the image to present facts, or make a synthesis, that was not in the sources.

978:

Could you tell me why you deleted this page? I don't see it in the deletion log and we have OTRS permission for it if copyright was the only issue. If there was more, could you add something to the log so I can show them what the problems are?

2935:. Unfortunately, it is in Russian. I'll try to contact the Russian author to see whether his book is translated into the English. His name appears in red (I put it in ]), although there is an article about him in the Russian Knowledge (XXG). 529:

Thanks. Seems bizarre that an in-use template can be deleted. Is there no "what links here" check before deleting a template? Where could I suggest/discuss that procedure? Anyway, I've now done an AWB run to fix all the pages that used it.

259:

No disagreemnt with you about not speedy deleting, I just wanted to know who else in the band was notable before considering whether this should be an AfD or not. I think I will just notability tag it and watchlist it for a few days first.

2610:

I would like to ask you to place my article on Knowledge (XXG) for me because I am not sure to do the things properly. Thank you in advance ! I created a similar article in French. Can you tell me to whom I could ask the same question ?

2452:

Also, you stated Carol driver is just a travel writer. Carol Driver is also a famous actress from Essex, England as well as well known celebrity gossip columnist. I kindly suggest doing your research before deleting articles on a whim.

1944:

I realize that FFU has had quite a backlog lately, so I went to do some work over there tonight. I soon realized you had handled or commented in many of the threads, and I was pleasantly surprised. :-) I went to check the archive, and

3534:

In regards to my personal feelings, while it has nothing to do with the legality of the issue. I oppose the current way that information is presented at the MySchool website, but I expect that the next version will be better. *shrug*

303:

I seldom know anything about the bands, so I just look for any suggestion that they may meet something in WP:Music / WP:Band. Prod is a lazy way, that is why I do them far more. You can see I have started very very few AFD's myself!

3555:

add a number of paintings he has done to a gallery within the wiki article, what do you recommend as validation? He is using flickr under the nickname qualitytimelord but is willing to provide any reasonable ID you wish. Thanks!

446:. I have gone through and removed just about as much copyvio and unsourced material as possible and added a couple of references outside of the college website. The only problem is that I think the article should be located at 3951:

the word "very" as in "Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright very seriously." I'm not a fan of hyperbole. Does the word "very" add anything beyond the word "seriously"? Hoping for an answer to at least the first question. Thanks,

2291:

Thanks for pointing out that I am not using the appropriate username. If you could restore the articles that I typed for Micronation, that would save me time typing it again. Please also point out any mistakes I make in the

3655: 786: 1968:

I see... i can't believe how much crud does one has to go through these days even to accomplish the simplest task. As i've said i am pretty medieval, you seem to know the paper-work well. Thanks for all the information.

1360:, responding to an "Is it real" question with "no, this is a comedy video, the game (unfortunately) is not real. My video must be pretty good if it was that convincing though! :]" Perhaps you will reconsider, Thanks -- 4064:), their description pages also included a fair use rationale. At that point, all was well. However, the problem arose when those Knowledge (XXG) files were removed from the articles in March 2009 by a user (see 2511:

So I saw your name on Help Desk or something (can't remember) and I was wondering, isn't there someone who works on the production staff of Dr. Who who's named Graeme Bartlett? I may be mistaken, so sorry if I am

2005:

but only two appear in the article. Any idea why the other two don't show? I'd like these to be available for all on Wikimedia Commons, not just Knowledge (XXG). What do I need to do to fix all of this? Thanks.

866: 1395:

I have no position on this on the merits (undeletion isn't my usual haunt), but I do see the article for t he jeweler as having been deleted as per G11, if you didn't see that, you might want to check again:

1083:

Thanks, I've removed a bit more. To be honest I was thinking of taking this to AfD anyway on notability grounds, but then noticed that pretty much all of the text seemed to be a copy, hence the speedy tag.

3908:

Greetings! The artist has changed his flickr profile to reflect his name and the cc license. I believe he has also begun uploading pictures that may be used in the article as well. Thanks for your time!

3756: 2165:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our

3531:, I strongly suggest looking to other sources (such as the school's Annual School Report, or equivalent, which is usually better anyway as it will provide history of certain data and context). 1234:

references to the page. Please let me know if you can add the page again. This is because you don't understand our community, our small society, because you would find Jonathan very important.

2248:

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..

655:

Why did the page get deleted? There are many reliable references from reliable sources in the article and I am sure the article was improved from when it was created two months ago. He meets

3750: 3265:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 3093:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 610:

The speedy delete is for unequivocal cases. In this case there was a clear claim to own the copyright. This claim was quite beleivable. And cc-by-sa-3.0 was granted. Article was called

3590:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge (XXG). 1790:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge (XXG). 2449:

Could you please revert the deletion of this article. Due to a browser error the initial article was blank. However, I was editing it. Furthermore I explained this in talk page.

3985: 3162: 2745: 2685: 1909: 1001: 697:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 3527:

issue last year was that ACARA didn't pursue SMH and others, I expect that they'll be a lot more aggressive from here on in. I don't want to see wikipedia made an example of.

3261:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

3089:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1655: 1177: 1213: 1202: 1183:

I hope I can live up to everyone's expectations, do my best for Knowledge (XXG), and take to heart the constructive criticism. Always feel free to message me if I'm around.

1131:

Hey I did not notice the 5-4-3 rule! This sort of double move happens more than it should. Perhaps we need a "closing" option or button to prevent a double delete action.

3889:

Hi Graeme, Thanks for your direction. The CC license is now indicated on the website (www.anitadaher.com). Would you like me to resubmit the photo upload request? Cheers,

860: 667:

that have pages with less info and/or less reliable sources and they are in the same situation as Machado and those pages are still around. Thanks for reading this.

636:

Are all inventors by default notable, even when the supposed invention isn't even explicable? And where are the reliable sources, or any sources, for that matter?

3254:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

3195:

again in the matter and see if the logo that we actually use in tech fest, could be uploaded in its wiki page, otherwise any other logo would serve no purpose :)..

3082:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

1555:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

1452:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

2196:

I was looking for the Wiki page for "Seize the Day" and it appears you deleted it today. Can you let me know why or is there is any way I can read it? tallgaier--

2080:

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the

3250:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 3078:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2847:. Is there a special purpose or situation in which it should be used in place of the latter? If not, I plan to merge them for uniformity on the FFU page. Cheers, 2057:

text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from

1551:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1448:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2242: 2234:. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the 701:

Hello, I see that you restored this. Has it gone to deletion review? If so, that tag should be placed on his article so editors can comment on the review. ----

439: 442:/"How-to-guide" which you declined. About a week after that, someone decided to try again with a slightly different title, which I came across this morning - 4069: 3120: 2111: 4061: 1838:

I'm sorry i'm quite medieval in terms of internet terminology & bureaucracy and all. So i hope you can help to upload that rare T-72 interior photo.

66:. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than 794: 2303:

Thanks, I will have a read through the stuff you've sent me. The referencing style is different to writing a thesis or in programming, thanks again.

166:'Solita'. Yes, it is a town in Colombia, yes it is used as a way to refer to women, but it is also a company of notable size and respect in Finland. 3270: 3098: 2070: 1714: 2356: 1243:

you understand my friend ? Jonathan is a good futurist since a long time, you will agree. Let me know, have a good day and thanks for your time.

135:

If I deleted your article, it may be possible for me to restore it. Please post a message for reconsideration of the deletion. and you can read

3658:. (I think I've told everyone involved now. Not sure if I was supposed to notify the closing admin of the first discussion, but I did anyway.) 1055:

Bump. Just in case you didn't notice this. (If you can't remember you declined a copyvio speedy, but the rest of the article is still a copy).

136: 3594: 2758: 1794: 1209: 1985: 1854: 3583: 1783: 3795: 3767: 129: 126: 123: 514:. Can you shed light on why it's been deleted? Was there a discussion deprecating this template and recommending a different one? Thanks. 3847: 3205: 2909: 2793: 2776: 360:

Thank you. That was very kind of you. I am sorry ... there is so much to learn about how this site runs that I am lost half the time. --

120: 117: 114: 111: 108: 105: 102: 99: 96: 2231: 1718: 2469: 2349: 2319: 182: 3868: 3579: 3295:

Sorry for the dead link. I submitted a picture but I put the link up before it had been verified. Thanks for staying on the ball.

1779: 1334:. If you can't/won't undelete, can you give me an idea of which sections we could remove to make the page more acceptable? Cheers, 1330:

because you've marked it as a "club" but actually we're trying to make a page about our publication. We are similar to this group:

46: 4075:

Consequently, could you please undelete the files mentioned? I hope my explanation was clear. Thanks in advance for your help.

3311: 2554: 2526: 2001:

Thanks for your message...nice for a newbie to get some help. I think I did the same procedures for each of the 4 photographs at

1923:

Thanks for setting up the logo on the page! I kept trying to insert it from the Hebrew Knowledge (XXG), but it wouldn't work...

1539: 465:

Thanks for doing that :). When I tried moving the article, I got a message that said it was something only admins could do etc.

337: 3587: 3575: 2987: 2951: 2654: 2627: 2590: 1237:"The life of a human in 2200 will be richer than the life of the richest in 2020. That is why I love life." --Jonathan Després 52:

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than

4060:

and the different articles on the respective euro values. As they are non-free images of "national" sides of euro coins (see

3066: 583: 2151: 917: 811: 727: 717: 611: 380: 3242:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 3070:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1706: 1646: 1624: 1543:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1440:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 245:

You had better de link the other one, but one notable member is enough to avoid a speedy delete, and go for a prod instead.

63: 3626: 3516:

12. Subject to Clauses 7,8 and 10, you must not, without our prior written permission, do any of the following things:

1760: 1287: 1259: 881: 3430: 3255: 3083: 1710: 1556: 1453: 3471:

of primary source data (telephone books) in which neither the methodology or results are verified by a reliable source.

1787: 1775: 1356:

You recently declined the speedy deletion of this article, saying that it is not an obvious hoax. However the author on

848: 571: 3328:

websites and this may have caused the problem. I am not sure how all this works, so any help would be great! Best Kai

2235: 2174: 2066: 690: 630: 434:

to that spot, as there seem to be no other institutions with this name. The article has quite an amusing history, with

4044: 4039: 4034: 4029: 4024: 4019: 4014: 4009: 4004: 2125:

If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to

641: 1436: 3863:

This is your invitation to the 10th anniversary event for Knowledge (XXG), on Saturday 15 January 2011; please see

1069:

I have remove more of the dubious paragraphs, do you want to check if the paragraph on Australia is a problem too?

972: 431: 3347: 2932: 2898: 1751:, and the heated exchanges that have led to the need to temporarily protect the article, I have started an RFC at 1145:

Yes, I have wondered about that. I also wonder if it ever happens and is not noticed. Must do sometimes, I guess.

3935: 3730: 3637: 3602: 3442: 3394: 3128: 2876: 2855: 2386: 2147: 2082: 1981: 1850: 1802: 1380: 1365: 1136: 1074: 619: 484: 309: 279: 250: 222: 17: 3799: 3784: 3771: 3612:

N(NO2)3 reference page is not indexed in Knowledge (XXG)'s Search Box, but appears in the resulting Search Page

2156: 2119: 2093: 1756: 1192: 819: 3910: 801:

policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure

1350: 842: 504: 3978: 3971: 3851: 3262: 3209: 3090: 2913: 2787: 2678: 2671: 1898: 1891: 1327: 761: 365: 3843: 3617:

parenthesis make some trouble to the indexing mechanism. Just to keep you informed. Have a Good Year 2011!

3299: 3201: 2975: 2939: 2905: 2642: 2615: 2578: 2457: 2307: 2166: 2054: 1973: 1842: 1275: 1247: 559: 170: 3238: 3184: 2369: 1150: 1121: 990: 983: 637: 511: 2118:

If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at

1722: 3920: 3876: 3560: 3180: 2783: 2766: 2700: 2693: 2465: 2343: 2315: 2297: 1954: 1825: 838: 470: 455: 178: 3003:

Any chance I can see what the concern was? I may have been able to do edits to correct his concerns:

806: 756: 3693: 3540: 2461: 174: 3931: 3894: 3890: 3834: 3726: 3714: 3648: 3633: 3598: 3438: 3390: 3333: 3329: 3307: 3280: 3124: 3108: 2870: 2849: 2707: 1977: 1846: 1798: 1409: 1376: 1361: 1132: 1070: 1024: 672: 615: 480: 305: 275: 246: 218: 3578:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge (XXG) uses a set of 2979: 2943: 2831: 2821: 2646: 2619: 2582: 2530: 2493: 2197: 1778:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge (XXG) uses a set of 802: 592: 403: 146: 4083: 3956: 3437:

says they are OK if original ideas or arguments. In this case the idea is certainly not original.

3151: 3144: 2983: 2947: 2734: 2727: 2650: 2623: 2586: 2497: 2276: 2261: 2201: 2074: 2062: 2050: 2036: 2025: 2011: 1872: 1698: 1675: 1188: 1089: 1060: 1045: 888: 874: 706: 150: 3247: 3196: 3075: 2868:

OK, that's fine. I just thought it was odd there were two templates. Thanks for clearing that up.

1548: 1445: 1335: 4057: 3622: 3536: 3472: 3405: 3363: 1876: 1217: 738: 600: 563: 447: 427: 411: 392: 361: 294: 265: 236: 207: 3830: 3468: 2020:

Thanks for your help making the photo visible and making edits to the article. Much appreciated!

1033: 941:

Hi Graeme Bartlett. Could you userfy this page for me? Jack Creek (Florida). Thank you much. --

809:. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 162: 4087: 3960: 3939: 3924: 3898: 3879: 3838: 3818: 3814: 3803: 3775: 3734: 3719: 3684: 3680: 3667: 3663: 3641: 3606: 3564: 3544: 3491: 3446: 3424: 3398: 3382: 3337: 3315: 3285: 3213: 3158: 3132: 3113: 3041: 3022: 2991: 2955: 2917: 2883: 2862: 2815: 2809: 2796:) for a username violation, as the company being promoted is "Betta Dayz Management"? Thanks, 2770: 2741: 2716: 2658: 2631: 2594: 2558: 2501: 2473: 2439: 2435: 2323: 2280: 2265: 2256:

OK, you are the first reasonable person I've heard from. How do I make this into a template?

2205: 2186: 2029: 2015: 1989: 1958: 1949:. Thanks for your work, I appreciate it and I'm sure many others do as well. Have a good day, 1932: 1928: 1905: 1880: 1858: 1806: 1764: 1734: 1683: 1618: 1614: 1601: 1515: 1511: 1498: 1412: 1384: 1369: 1343: 1339: 1316: 1291: 1283: 1263: 1255: 1225: 1196: 1154: 1146: 1140: 1125: 1117: 1093: 1078: 1064: 1049: 1027: 997: 965: 950: 931: 906: 902: 766: 743: 710: 676: 645: 623: 604: 575: 539: 523: 488: 474: 459: 426:

Good morning Graeme, I'd like to ask a favour - could you remove the creation protection from

415: 396: 384: 369: 350: 346: 313: 298: 283: 269: 254: 240: 226: 211: 186: 154: 77: 3654:

As you declined my speedy request, I'm just letting you know I've nominated the above at AfD

3251: 3079: 1552: 1449: 30: 3916: 3872: 3556: 3226: 3176: 3054: 3037: 3030:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Cmagha/John_A._Ware&action=edit&redlink=1

3018: 2762: 2311: 2293: 2182: 1950: 1730: 1527: 1424: 1312: 1221: 961: 946: 567: 466: 451: 2077:

has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

1938: 1747:

Hi. In the light of the current dispute regarding the inclusion of an image in the article

1664: 1569: 1466: 798: 782: 656: 3708: 3358: 3303: 3274: 3102: 2549: 2521: 1597: 1494: 1402: 1304: 668: 535: 519: 3582:

to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

3434: 3243: 3071: 2058: 1782:

to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

1544: 1441: 854: 274:

So no prod? Any way there is plenty more for me to delete at this point (or not delete)

1755:. Please do add your opinion, and hopefully we can achieve a policy-based consensus. -- 4079: 3952: 2841: 2272: 2257: 2021: 2007: 1917: 1663:

While all contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

1085: 1056: 1041: 926: 702: 664: 660: 3632:

Well it is autocompleting now anyway. Thanks for caring enough to want to create it!

2141: 3618: 3593:

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on

2537: 1793:

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on

1687: 1398:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sterling_Jewelers&action=edit&redlink=1

749: 734: 694: 683: 596: 407: 388: 290: 261: 232: 203: 2169:. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators 1634: 1575:

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

1472:

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

3810: 3676: 3659: 2797: 2431: 2245:

until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

2002: 1924: 1610: 1507: 1279: 1251: 898: 341: 2092:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at

3725:

You are correct it was advertising! I should have checked the content out first.

1819:

I'm writing on behalf of that TPDK-1 gunner's station photo on the T-72 article.

340:. Thanks very much for coming along and your contributions. Sincerely, James. -- 3033: 3014: 2757:

Hi, Graeme Bartlett. I would like your opinion once more about the copyright of

2227: 2212: 2178: 1726: 1308: 957: 942: 829: 3458:"Original images created by a Wikipedian are not considered original research, 2220: 2042: 145:

page. I just want to know which aspect is wrong so that i can fix it next tome.

2377: 1833: 1357: 1240:"If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one." --John Golsworthy 815:

article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the

531: 515: 3763:

Please confirm that you have no objection to my creating the WT: page again.

3707:

Even for a press agent, that's pretty smarmy and pathetically promotional. --

3460:

so long as they do not illustrate or introduce unpublished ideas or arguments

2540:. Same first name, different last name, but sounded a bit similar in my mind 1693:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

3809:

Thank you very much for doing this for me. I was sick as a dog after Xmas.

1375:

If you can do the db-hoax and add that explanation then I won't decline it.

921: 199: 3911:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/multifreakinational/5264143964/in/photostream/

3656:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Thomas Howes (actor) (2nd nomination)

3702: 3522:

c) compete with or displace the market for this Site and its Content;

1866:

Alternative cover image to the Tom & Jerry Spotlight Collection Vol.2

1752: 1642: 1628: 4053:

This a request for undeletion of those files, for the following reason.

777: 406:). It is a shame that the pro-deleting faction of Wikipedians has won -- 755:

As he now has signed, was going to userfy if there are no objections.

1826:

http://airlandseaweapons.devhub.com/blog/482328-t-72-in-the-gulf-war/

217:

See the blue links, unless you can show they are the wrong members.

3611: 2338: 1521:

Orphaned non-free image File:Center for American Progress logo.jpg

1210:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:User pages/Archive 7#Secret pages: Ok or not?

1168: 1116:

you and I seem to be stepping on one another's toes rather a lot.

4000:

On 29 August 2009, between 8:01 and 8:02, you deleted the files:

3829:

Thanks, but I've had it. Would you please block me infinitely? --

3757:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Policy sculpting: inclusion versus exclusion

3741:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Policy sculpting: inclusion versus exclusion

3048:

Orphaned non-free image File:Democratic Alliance Greece Logo.jpg

1656:

Knowledge (XXG)'s notability guidelines for fictional characters

781:

Hello Graeme Bartlett! Thank you for your contributions. I am a

1582:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

1479:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

1331: 1748: 1741: 956:

Got it 2x. Sorry for the duplication. Thanks for your help! --

479:

Actually you are right, it was create protected back in 2008.

25: 3867:

for details, and RSVP if at all possible. (You are listed on

3570:

License tagging for File:Whats Eating Gilbert Grape cover.jpg

1596:

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off

1493:

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off

3988: