User talk:Guillaume2303/Archive 4

4693:

According to the infobox instructions, this is for the ISO abbreviation, which is internationally standardized. Personally, I find acronyms a bit silly, it's like assuming our readers cannot spell. 3/ Sorry about reverting, I didn't know that, can you point me to that decision? 4/ SGM may be widely used and understood in the particular community of microbiologists, but we are writing for a more general public. The whole abbreviation is used only once in the article, so why introduce it in the first place? 5/ Oops, didn't see that. Should the list editor be mentioned at all? The Guide for writing journal articles (I think) says only to list the editor. And why don't you want to wikilink to editor in chief? As for the caps, being an editor myself, I prefer using lc, editors are just people doing a job... :-) --

3844:. There are a couple of ways of doing it. If you are only citing the same work with different pages twice, then one may use two entries, or if there are multiple cites with different pages in the same work, then one can put the work in the sources section and use abbreviated footnotes like Thompson (2006) page 17; Thompson (2006) page 47. You are correct that it may be slightly supererogatious to provide pinpoint citation for a two page article. But after one has repeatedly spent time looking for the datum somewhere in a thirty page article, and eventually come to the conclusion that the citation did not in fact stand for the proposition suggested by its placement, one appreciates pinpoint citation. In other words, it is a good habit that is supported by the Knowledge (XXG) policy of 3769:

However, please do not continue to distort the Phil Trans entry. The fact is it was the first journal exclusively devoted to science. This is not in question. It is a fact and I shall be happy to send you the relevant evidence. As it is a factual statment, it should not be reverted. The mention of JDS here is an optional piece of background only and I am happy to have it included, but only in a correct context, not the original context which tried to claim it was the first science journal. This is not correct, as JDS published a wide variety of scholarly material. Please look at reference no. 1 in the wikipedia entry for Journal des Scavans, I quote "Although the Journal des sçavans is often hailed as the first scientific journal, this is not quite true."

3519:(I have a link to that on my user page, together with some other links that may be useful for editing journals). Of course, this only lists their services, but it's a start. I didn't check it myself earlier, because I only was online for a short time (couldn't sleep.... :-(. As for being refereed, I actually just assumed that, because otherwise they would not profile themselves as a scientific journal. It should be checked though, because some IEEE publications are indeed not reviewed and therefore should be classed as magazines. About the other figures, there are of course no real rules here, but all other journal articles only mention the impact factor. Some articles also list other citation data, but on an article level. See 1208:(and subcategories of subcategories, I am still reorganizing all that stuff...) whether you find a category that fits better. The problem was that you put it in "scientific journals". Although that category contains many journals, it needs emptying, not adding... Categorizing JHSB as a sociology journal on the one hand and a healthcare journal on the other hand seemed to me the best solution, but I'll happily accept a better one. If there is a bunch of similar journals, I could even create a new category just for them. (But bear in mind that categories should not be too narrow either, else they lose their utility). -- 3932:

authors that have published in the Organdi journal cite it, and it is cited by others in academic bibliographies and references. But information on the journal is scarce, so I thought it might be a good service to the public and the scientific community to provide basic information via wikipedia. I do not think that infos on a less known, "small" journal are entirely unnotable. And by the way: where are the limits of notability, and who is to decide on them? What will become of the idea of a 💕, if a class of supervisors starts to function as editors, deciding which lemmata are "notable" and which not ...

631:

under P).” I corrected this mistakes, but now these mistakes are back again. It is important to look at the results of your actions, especially if you use a script. You didn’t go into my previous arguments on your talk page, but said something about starting an RfC. (Can’t find my comment (25 Jan.) back on your talk page, so I guess it was removed). Why start an RfC and consume people’s costly time while anyone can see the same format is frequently used in similar Knowledge (XXG) pages and is working effectively? My proposal is to restore the page to the situation on Febr.3, 2010, 17:00 hr. Regards,

127:). I hope you will not "improve" these four (and other) useful lists too. Instead of improving, you effectively destroyed the Knowledge (XXG) article on African Studies Journals, without (in my view) any good arguments. I won't quarrel with you again. Our time can be used much better in a positive way. What I will do: improve the lemma of African Studies Journals by comprising it to one page and by adding "journal home" to any journal title on that page, as is done in several other wiki-articles about journals (as mentioned above). The complete list will be stored somewhere else. Kind regards, -- 2695:, it's not a peer-reviewed journal, but a mere newsletter. A newsletter can be notable, for some have carried important scholarly work--and I want to try to get some of the noteworthy ones into Knowledge (XXG). It is possible that it is a peer-reviewed journal, be that this is not reflected in the available material--for otherwise I am quite puzzled it is on any recommended list, however prepared. Princeton Theological Seminary claims to have a set, and I will be visiting there to give a talk on Knowledge (XXG) in May, so I'll look at it then. 666:: the fact that other articles make the same mistakes is not a justification for keeping those mistakes also in the African studies journals article. I oppose any reversion to the previous, incorrect, state. If you still think (after reading the guidelines that I have linked to here) that I am wrong and you are right, you are welcome to ask for the opinion of other editors by opening an RfC (although I must warn you that it would appear a rather futile exercise to me and, indeed, "consume people’s costly time" for nothing). -- 4996: 3290: 3261: 3234: 34: 3334:. The guy has authored a book of which just one volume has over 125,000 citations in Google Scholar. Much as I dislike that search engine because of its inaccuracies, that is about 10, times as high as the highest citation number I have ever seen. I don't really intend to work much more on this article. If you would put as much effort in finding sources as in putting {{cn}} and PROD tags, it probably would be perfectly sourced by now... -- 4345: 3994:) 12:42, 19 April 2010 (UTC)*I have corrected the article. In principle, anybody can remove that notability tag, provided they address the problem (or think it has been addressed sufficiently). However, if the person who originally placed the tag disagrees, the result often is a deletion discussion. I have to say that I have not seen any evidence of notability and this is certainly the way that I would go. -- 2189: 2139: 1752: 1738: 2282:

that should make him realize that from time to time, he misinterprets things and actually make him more prudent before jelling "vandalism" or "persecution" instead of more likely to do so. Anyway, I hope this episode is over and that you'll succeed in making a good contributor out of him. As I have said before, WP needs people with knowledge of Russian themes to improve our coverage. Happy editing! --

2976:

vice chairman, respectively"? This was sourced to a book on the history of art history in Sweden. The only reason I can see to remove either of these things would be if a separate article were to be written on the society, and I don't think that is needed. In any case, it functions as background for the later decision to start a journal published in Stockholm, as opposed to the already existing one (

4721: 2016:, because by improving an article it may in the end turn out to be better to keep it than delete it. If you would stop accusing people and yell "vandalism" at everybody who disagrees with you, articles never will get improved. Why don't you try to improve the encyclopedia instead of yelling at people and picking fights. Please don't post on my talk page any more, I am done with you. -- 3864:

a few articles were provided with inline citation. Most editors just put some titles in the Sources (or Reference) section and felt that that was adequate. (That is what I did in the first article that I created.) The confusion over references and footnotes continues to this day. That is why I like calling the sections Notes and Sources (or Further reading) rather than References. --

2419: 491: 3010:. I'll change that, too. The references need to be cleanup up, too. Most of what is under "databases" can be deleted. The section "Recognition" should be renamed and retitled. The "Notes" are the "references" and the "references" should either be deleted or be used to source statements in the article and reformatted as real references. Hope this helps explain the tag. -- 1239:

Once that is done, I intend to go through the top categories "academic journals" and "scientific journals" and remove all journal articles from them and re-categorize articles into appropriate categories. Again, an existing category may fit better or else we can create a new category, but the article really should not be categorized as "scientific journal". --

2255:

particular, it would have been worth explaining policies to him, rather than just directing him to them. Also, while some of the comments I saw would generally be seen as constructive criticism, he may not have understood them as such, given that English isn't his first language. In short, I think you bit a newcomer, but that's just my opinion. Regards,

1101:"notability refers to being known for such engagement." The journal in question is excerpted by the two most influential literary bibliographical services in the world for its topic areas. Why is this insufficient to constitute "notability?" Please advise. Also, please be so kind as to note that I seeded 3931:

Hi, you have raised two questions in modifying my entry: the question of (1) notability and the question of (2) academic journal or not. Ad 2: The Organdi quarterly is listed as academic journal in many journal lists - I have quoted some of these references in my renewed version. Ad 1: Several of the

3863:

When I first started editing Knowledge (XXG), things were much looser than they have now become. Which is why you will see articles up for deletion that have been around for several years, and only now are other editors asking: Where is the significant coverage in secondary sources? Originally only

2587:

studies are hardly the most world-changing discipline, and the number of Knowledge (XXG) readers who might benefit from knowing who's who in that field is undoubtedly small. However, although I'm not an Origenist, he's such a major early theologian, that he's actually even relevant to my own research

2385:

Hi again, I have gone through the class B and C academic journals and most humanities/social sciences journals in those categories were actually pretty bad and contained a lot of fluff and other inappropriate stuff. After cleaning them, I re-assessed them as Start at most... So it seems like there is

2366:

and for the uninformed reader (which is who we are writing for here) probably has no clue why it is worth mentioning that these people have published in the journal. If there is an article that was exceptionally well cited or that was prominently mentioned in popular media, that would be an excellent

2254:

Well, I've started talking with SerdechnyG. He seems receptive to my explanations, and is keeping his cool. I explained to him why referring to yours and EEMIV's actions as persecution would seem excessive here, and also stated that I felt that the two of you could have been more patient with him. In

1967:

I deleted the block of text from the interview, not Guillaume2303. It was an abuse of copyrighted material to copy-and-paste such a large block of text, particularly since Knowledge (XXG) didn't offer any transformative value to the original work. It is more appropriate to summarize or paraphrase the

1867:

section. These are my reasons. Restoring the two deleted links would put four important links in one group for the readers to use. Having the links together would underline their mutual relatedness and their relatedness to the topic whether or not the links are mentioned in the body of the article.

799:

Guillaume2303, You changed the status of the Fordham Law Review from six issues per year to bimonthly. I'm not sure if this is technically correct since the issues come out in October, November, December, March, April, and May--not at a steady two month pace. I'm switching it back to the way it was.

689:

also states: "No page should be linked from a Knowledge (XXG) article unless its inclusion is justifiable according to this guideline and common sense." I would like to stress the two last words in this quotation. Lists of journals in Knowledge (XXG) are really different from Knowledge (XXG) articles

4628:

I guess it's just an irreconcilable conflict between a card-carrying inclusionist and the rest of the 'pedia -- I simply can't see a single reason for deleting a viable existing article on a peer-reviewed academic journal that's been around since 2003 (apart from those "journals" which masquerade as

3487:

The indexing services I provided were the only ones I have access to. I don't have access to the subcription indexing services. I notice that some journals provide the names of indexing services that carry their information. Others don't. So, it is difficult for me to know which ones they are. I can

2862:

I tend to like the OCLC links as well for these older works that often don't have DOI, ISSN or ISBN, since they help people who can still go to brick-and-mortar libraries, but I recognize many WP editors don't like seeing them in citations, especially for massively referenced articles. Accordingly I

2822:

the OCLC linkages. I hope in the new form you find they are more usable. Feel free to refactor as needed. *On WorldCat's pages for these OCLCs there are "electronic journals" listed that link to googlebooks and HathiTrust images of the early volumes. This was the first time I had seen the HathiTrust

2619:

With regard to your original objection, that the Group themselves call their journal a "newsletter", I'd offer that this is classic academic understatement (even the generic name "journal" is very unassuming for the cutting-edge information that these publications contain), and that both the Italian

2611:

Where do we go from here? Well, I hope that, now I've had time to actually present some information for you one-to-one, you might actually support provision of a basic start or stub of an article on the Italian Origen Research Group, or on their journal. Probably an article on the group, rather than

2513:

Thanks for your kind words. I actually don't think that this article is completely beyond hope, as the reality TV show seems to exist. But someone (probably the subject himself) keeps inserting all kinds of nonsense ("D.O.A." and such) sourced to YouTube and the likes and that basically made me give

2276:

was refused and any attempt to communicate with SerdechnyG has proven to be in vain ever since. Attempts to improve the articles that I took to Afd are rebuked (and note that it is not at all unusual for the nom at an AfD to try to improve an article and hence prove himself wrong). The articles that

1287:

The category "scientific journals" is unwieldy because many people have added articles to it without checking the category itself first. Also, often people will categorize, say, a mathematics journals as (indeed) "mathematics journal", but then also add "scientific journal". The latter is incorrect:

872:

Oops, I just reverted that, all other journal articles just give the abbreviation in normal type. Does the Bluebook (I don't know that and don't have access to it, i think) give this instruction only for the Fordham journal (in which case we should probably follow it), or is this a general thing (in

3890:

I can't figure out how to do the disambiguation for "jackknife." I thought I had it figured out, but the disambiguation tag remains indicating it still needs fixing. If you know how to do that I would appreciate it; once I see it done properly I should be able to avoid disambiguation in the future.

3768:

Dear Guillaume2303, please let's not get into some silly acrimonious edit war here. I did try and correct the entry retaining the mention of JDS, but that was reverted too. So I removed it in the interests of simplicity. I don't really mind what you do to the entry about JDS as it's not my concern.

3350:

I wish you would add some more citations, the article has existed for five years pretty much uncited, the subject of the BLP would rather not have the article, I had a look round and found little in the way of ordinary citations, I am not much of a scholar. I have asked at a wikiproject page for an

2615:

Although I have no particular passion for this Italian group, I've come to know they exist and do good work in an area that is valuable to at least me, and people in related disciplines to mine. The way things are at Wiki, though, people sometimes find it hard to believe anyone would start articles

1999:

Dear SerdechnyG, you're starting to get on my nerves. If you look at the diff that you give above, you'll see that the interview is still there. I did not remove it so please start being a bit more careful, as you seem to be so fond of reminding others. (Not that I don't agree with the removal, but

1643:

and 2/ the scientific journal and academic journal categories are top categories that should remain empty (even though they are not at the moment, that is the aim). Articles should be assigned to appropriate subcategories. As I just returned home from a transatlantic trip, I crashed and went to bed

5147:

Dear Guillaume2303 - I hope it is Ok to write here and ask if you, as an influencial editor, might have another look at Prof Keyes article before the deadline and see if any of the "new" evidence is enough to allow you to help change your mind and avoid the deletion. The H-index up to 16 (from the

4692:

1/ I guess we've been looking at different articles then... :-) I don't mind either way, but think we should be consistent. Perhaps the infobox can be tweaked to display these abbreviations in italics by default, that way we don't have to go round and change all those articles that I have seen. 2/

4148:

I hope we can use this page as a way to work out the issues surrounding the words "Phenomics" and "Phenome". The two words have been used in many scientific publications and are listed as words in many online dictionaries. I think Knowledge (XXG) should have these words as a separate items in it's

3005:

check this and was thrown off by the fact that the T&F site uses capitals for the header of the page. Further down they don't and the journal cover (the final arbiter, so to so), doesn't do either, so I'll change this back. As for the Stockholm-centric thing, the way the reference was placed I

3000:

I think the list of "publishers" and "editors" should be pared down. Having a list of the equivalent of "editors in chief" is fine for a journal article, but I have the impression that the "publishers" are basically the persons handling the day-to-day running of the journal and those are generally

2975:

You also removed things in the history section that gave important context, such as names and positions of people involved at the time the society was started. And what was wrong with pointing out that "The society was clearly Stockholm-centric from the start: Sirén and Roosval became chairman and

2909:

Yes, it seems that the multi-OCLC condition is intrinsic in the distributed-source design of WorldCat. Over time a single one should theoretically be established that covers all editions, but that rather depends on all contributing libraries to be enthusiastic about maintaining their catalogues, a

2361:

and the writing guide for academic journals). The BEQ article looks pretty reasonable to me as it is now. If there are any awards to list, that would be good. Also, I don't understand why you removed the "normal" impact factor. Having an IF is always a very important argument when journal articles

2281:

part of the Chris Adams article, and posted several comments offering advice on the talk pages of the articles concerned, but SerdechnyG just ignores all. I understand the problems with English not being his first language. It is not my first first language either. But he must be aware of this and

2271:

I don't disagree completely with you. We definitely got off on the wrong foot. I prodded some of his articles during new page patrol. PROD gives a week to improve articles and, indeed, it often prods contributors to clean up the article they created and correct the signaled problem. In this case I

1866:

I see your point. I also observed that the MOS indicated that "However, whether a link belongs in the 'See also' section is ultimately a matter of editorial judgment and common sense." In my editorial judgment, it would be better for the article if the deleted links were restored to the "See also"

1292:

is categorized as a scientific journal, but if so, it will have to be removed and categorized more exactly. The end-goal will be to have not a single journal directly categorized as "scientific journal". Get me right, I do not dispute that JHSB is a scientific journal. I only say that it should be

1238:

I don't really understand why you put the "scientific journal" category back. It is not intended to be used directly on articles as it is a top category. It should only contain subcategories. I am currently (slowly) going through all unassessed journal articles, rating them and doing some cleanup.

741:

Yes, I saw what you are doing. I don't intend to propose this for deletion, let's first see whether more can be found. It is strange, though, that there is no article on the German WP. In any case, all I was able to find suggest that Insektenbörse proper was only a small thing with ads from people

725:

Dear Guillaume2303 The BHL digital version is a bound up version of the weekly collectors magazine but the same publisher used the title InsektenBorse for E Rundschau and E Zeitschrift and these are so referenced (ie InsektenBorse) in very many insect descriptions.I put in some refs and will add a

630:

and on several other pages. Moreover: you repeat mistakes. My comment on 13 Jan.: “As you removed external links, two (of the three remaining!) journals under M do not longer have a link to the journal homepage, as the internal Wiki-link is incorrect; same goes for 3 (out of 5 remaining) journals

285:

I had seen that it continued under a different name, but given that I didn't have time to search for more info and that this was a completely uninformative one-liner, I thought PROD was the best (or at least, easiest) solution. I have tweaked the current article a bit, adding references to the NLM

4675:(1) In all the articles I've seen it's italicised (2) In all the articles I've seen all the relevant abbreviations are given (3) As I recall it was decided long ago that frequencies were clearer in numbers than words (4) SGM is extremely widely used and understood (5) Consistency with List Editor 4185:

I know from the talk pages that you have strong feelings about the phonemics redirect, and I'm very aware that there are numerous issues interacting in this matrix at this point. Things are getting out of hand, and I'd ask that we leave the phonemics article in place for a while yet and have some

4021:

The SSRN link gives the abstact of an article published in Ogandi, what does that prove beyond the fact that the journal existed? And a GS search gives exactly 35 hits, which is not directly an indication that there is any notability here either. Up till now, all you do is giving me arguments why

3510:

Hi Steve, yep, those engineers sure don't go for short and snappy! No problem of course watchlisting my talk. I sometimes do that with othr users, too, or look in their contributions because they have similar interests and may lead me to articles that I am interested in. The indexing services for

4963:

Hi. Ironically, I was re-editing this journal as the same time as you. I had an editing conflict and when I returned to the article I saw that you had already accomplished what I had set out to do. It is interesting that we both had almost the same wording. My format, however, was to be a little

3491:

Also, I notice that you removed other "numbers" that I placed there. I guess the only thing that is worth putting in an article is the impact factor. Is that correct? I can read your response here. One more thing - I could not find anywhere that says this publication is peer reviewed although I

2844:

Thanks, now I see what you meant! I have edited it a bit to make it more in line with WP style. I have left out the Google Books, because that only offers "snippet view" and you have to pay to get the whole thing. The HathiTrust has the same material and all for free, so I added that as a direct

2727:

I'm certainly happy with that, so long as you can be gracious about the article being short and more of a start than anything else. The group may be technically notable, but the note they warrant might only be a small one. I'll try not to let that make me lazy about extracting what information I

1555:

There is not much to discuss. Just adding some books that discuss (spaghetti) Westerns, or the film career of Charles Bronson may show notability for those movies and for the actor. It doesn't show notability for the individual characters. And, really, have a look at them: apparently there is no

1261:

is a scientific journal. I sympathize with you about the unwieldiness of the category of scientific journals although it is true that there exist a great many such journals, thousands. I also observed that there are journals in the category of scientific journals that don't belong (e.g., finance

464:

Hello, Guillaume2303. OK. I see the point in removing national categories in journals. Since you do the cleanup for "journals" section, I would ask you to de-redirect the category "Theology journals" (theology and religious studies is not the same thing) and include it to the categord "Academic

4442:

Hi ... Can you please direct me with greater specificity to the guidance in wp:mos that requires that we remove academic titles? Also, to the guidance that requires the deletion of the advisory board, per guide to writing journal articles and WP:NOTADIRECTORY? Also, in re your assertion that

4149:

database. Please add your thoughts to this page. As I am sure they will differ from my views, perhaps you can suggest a way to deal with is issue, because the current mode of dealing with this issue is not helpful, I am at a loss to find another way of dealing with it. I welcome your thoughts.

3724:

Hi Wim, I've provided a very belated reply at the list article. It really does need clean-up. Can we chat a bit about what end result might be useful at Knowledge (XXG): no lists of theology journals, a list of all journals that have articles, a top 100 list, a list of "top 10s" broken up by

2688:

I have known of that journal ranking project from the start. It is certainly taken seriously by Australian institutions, because government funds will be alloted based upon it. In the sciences, they are using bibliometric measures--though one can argue the details, it's at least a rational

1045:

is an important indexing database in CEE countries. Further, as the English-language Knowledge (XXG) serves not only the users from English-speaking countries but has a global appeal and offers an insight into global knowledge and information, deleting a new electronic journal from a "small"

758:

This all relates to the relationship between taxonomists, publishers and dealers especially in Germany and France. I may write more on this at a future date.Not so strange there is nothing on the German WP-there are not so many taxonomists about these days.Anywhere! I'll ask Wikipedian Fritz

1100:

It is not possible to address the concerns of the proposer for deletion for the simple reason that they are based on a priori assumptions. The respondent employs length of publication as the apparent sole criterion for notability. However, the criteria say nothing about this. They say that

5088:

My reply re. Crowther wad directed at Noq or whoever is removing categories and reverting to typos, etc. The refs are handy but the tagging and constant reversion to bad edits is making me very cross. I have had to sort out these pests before and would like to get this pest blocked if I

3105:

Hi, where I currently am, I cannot access any secure sites (https), so I haven't been able to see whether the journal is listed in the Science Citation Index and whether it has an impact factor. If it does, that would pretty much establish notability and should lead to a "keep" on Park.

2698:

What I think best is to do as Alaistair suggests, to write an article about the group with a section on the journal. since they have other publications as well, including monographs with separate WorldCat entries, it will be a substantial article and a good start for later expansion.

2607:

In seeking information on Origen, the Italian Origen Research Group is a major world player. In their very small pond, they are big fish. They are obviously not very devoted to their website, however. Research in theology-related disciplines rarely has much funding for things like that.

4863:

link, saying that the database was split off from the journal in 2003, but I cannot find anything about the database, not even on the ASME website. I also found a posting on a message board saying that it ceased publication in 2004 (on Google cache, the direct link does not load at the

4088:

The weekly probably wa because the website says they update weekly, but issues come out monthly. The 1982 probably was because they say that APEX is the follow-up journal of another that was established then. Don't worry about it, those things get caught sooner or later by someone :-)

3978:) 12:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC) Sorry for forgetting to sign. The journal was, according to its own claim, peer-reviewed. How can one really check if this claim was met? it is listed as academic in several sources. who can remove the notability tag you have placed? you alone or anybody?-- 3084:

and the picture of the journal. I'm sorry I am still making basic errors but I think I am improving but it is tricky to remember everything and I tend to be doing this while doing two other things as well. I am not sure I understand properly about how to establish the notability that

2689:

approach. But in the humanities I consider the way they are doing it to be unscientific, and a variant of I LIKE THIS ONE, as with other studies based upon reputation But it is still a reputable list and we need take it into account. WP:NOT TRUTH would be the relevant guideline.

1332:

I would, too, but the problem is that I could not find a single reference. I'd have left it alone if there had been a link to a homepage (or if I could have found a homepage), but I couldn't. It's not in JournalSeek or WorldCat. Perhaps you have other ideas how to find sources?

3142:

journals are published by sociological associations, groups, faculties, and institutions, and/or have the term "sociology" in their titles. All substantive articles appearing in these journals are abstracted and indexed, and citations are provided to the book reviews published

1036:

for deletion. I accept your kind remark that this article needs to be expanded in order to comply with Knowledge (XXG) coverage of academic journals, yet I cannot look past your statement that this journal is only indexed by DOAJ, as an external link showing its coverage by

1773:

I didn't see it in the MOS (apropos of the edits you made in the EA-OHP entry). Please direct to the spot in the MOS. I don't doubt you that it is there. I remembering seeing the guideline to which you referred, and could not find it. Perhaps I might appeal for a change.

3602:

Thanks, I only noticed that there was no difference after I had "corrected" your change. There is consensus in the WPJournals project for this (at least, when I removed the instructions for the italic title from the writing guide of that project, I was rapidly reversed).

4324:

article as "stub class." It would be nice if you could take another look, as the page has had much added to it since that rating was originally assigned and according to the quality scale guidelines, it is in the very least a "C" if not a "B" or a "GA." Thank you!

3644:

The listed sources, particularly: Steere, William Campbell; Parkins, Phyllis V. and Philson, Hazel A. (1976) Biological Abstracts/BIOSIS, The First Fifty Years, The Evolution of a Major Science Information Service New York Botanical Garden, Plenum Press, New York,

5148:

original 10) - and new (old) article not in the old h-index calculations with 135 citations - a number of citations which is 948. A reviewed book. An article in the: Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry. A mention in Highlights of Chemistry. Best wishes anyway (

1590:

Here it doesn't work that way. The problem is stated in the tag, so there is no need to expand on that. You correct the problem, you can take down the tag. You take down the tag without addressing the problem, the article gets taken to AfD. Simple as that! :-)

1576:, otherwise templates, which are have no argument, will be removed. In russian wiki we remove them 30 minutes after they were posted if nobody tries to discuss them. I don't know the whole procedure in en-wiki, but I have no doubts about their unnecessity. -- 322:

At some point or another all three titles were included in the Science Citation Index. However, I have no source for this (searching in the index to establish this fact is OR, I guess). Also, all three were included in PubMed, but the same pplies as for SCI.

2562:

firstly, thank you so very much for expressing timely and heart-felt sympathy for my wife and I. I appreciated it all the more knowing how your professional work is part of advancing human knowledge that could well spare others all sorts of misfortunes.

2534:

Understood. Even if Church himself is undermining that article, it's great you're trying to stop him. He really should let us cover him responsibly and well. How ironic if he's making it more trouble than it's worth to have an article covering his work.

3966:) establishing the notability of the subject. Finally, you ask "who is to decide on them"? Well, that is the community of WP editors (including yourself). If an editor feels that an article does not meet the criteria referred to above (and this can be 1634:

I removed the "German-language" category because it is a multilingual journal (and categorized as such), in which case we don't categorize all the different individual language, too. I removed the "scientific journals" category because 1/ it is not a

3948:

I'll answer here, because you are editing from an anonymous IP. As for the journal being academic, that depends in large measure on whether it was peer-reviewed or not. I'll have a look at the sources that you provided. As for notability, please see

1293:

categorized a bit more precisely than that. I can, for the moment, categorize it as "medical journal", how about that? And I repeat yet again, if you think there is a category that should be created for this and similar journals, that can be done. --

726:

note against the link. In the meantime I'm waiting for a response from Germany. It's confusing but this is an important scientific work in it's proper form. Please let me know If you plan to delete the article you were right to doubt. All the best

843:

One other thing: I also changed back the abbreviation to small caps because according to the Bluebook (the citation guide for law journals), the abbreviation for the Fordham Law Review should appear in small caps. Thanks again for all the edits.

4422:

Second, there are a bunch of articles where I filled in "yes" for peer review field. I reviewed the instructions on the infobox, as per your note in the edit history. I guess I will have to back and correct this error. Thanks for the heads up.

571:

Maybe I should start the International Knowledge (XXG) Editing Award, with a tacky website and an entry fee of €50. Winners will be limited to 10% of the numbers who enter; each gets a plaque that together with postage will cost me €10. --

110:

Dear Guillaume2303, (comment on your previous comment about African Studies Journals) I wholeheartedly disagree with you. I would have been glad if you would really have improved the list (making it a nice and handy Wiki-format, like

2206:

prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the

2156:

1721:. I recommend you to remove all of deletion templates and cross out all your nomination in deletion discussions. Otherwise I will request for administrator attention. Your current intention are clear. I rely on your common sense. -- 4611:

I tend to count indexing as significant coverage for academic journals (as otherwise only a handful would count), though I'm aware that this is subject to debate. You could just leave 'em -- I'm not sure why they're doing any harm?

2566:

But, back to business. As chance would have it, over the months I've been quietly working on my own research, an email was forwarded to me, regarding which journals we should approach to have our work published. I've uploaded a

1922:

Why did you deleted the information of scientifical titles of experts? Why did you deleted an interview content instead of hide it by a hidden comment or to make it convenient to read with wikipedia instruments? And many more.

3488:

assume that anything with the IEEE name in the title would be carried by the notable indexing services. Is there some place on the web that could supply simple information like which indexes carry what and the impact factor?

5051:(1) I'd much prefer italicised -- the abbreviations are almost always italicised in other contexts. I don't know if it can be done via the template, but that would cause problems with extra abbreviations if present (see 2). 4834:

is (obviously) a "review" journal. Since, it is listed in the Acta Materialia indexing I was looking for a database connected with AMR, and the ASME site says nothing about this. However, after some searching I found this:

3411:

I must say I find it odd that there would be no way of categorising something as Australian even when it has Australian in its title. I created the category partly as a way of justifying its inclusion in the Australian

1870:

Let me also be clear about this. I don't support piling up internal links in the "See also" section. I think having four is a workable number that will be an aide for visitors to the entry. Thanks for giving this your

2367:

thing to add, much more useful than this list of people. I'll have a look tomorrow to see whether I can find a good humanities/social sciences journal for you, but for now I'm off to bed! Hope this helps a bit. --

1402:

Guillaume2303, I wonder where I ran into you in the past. It must have been here on Knowledge (XXG), since I haven't been in Bordeaux in years, though I hope to spend some time near Cahors this summer. Het beste,

2575:

is peer-reviewed journal, not only on the short list of journals, but ranked "A". The ARC listing is also taken seriously by Australian research institutions (if you can trust I didn't fake or prompt the email).

1288:"mathematical journal" is already a subcategory of "scientific journal", so by being categorized as a mathematical journal the article automatically is included in "scientific journals". I don't know whether the 4160:

at length on the talk page. Whatever the outcome of the discussion there (which is the appropriate venue for discussion, not here), the claim that you coined the word "phenomics" should be substantiated by an

1461:

in agreement with DGG--usually I am, but let me reiterate that I was only three letters away from agreeing with you and with him, and if the vote had been to delete I would not have shed a tear. All the best,

3957:

with some (non-binding) thoughts on what specifically constitutes notability for an academic journal. The notability tag that I placed is not a call for deletion but an encouragement to provide sources (per

4865: 3441:

Although without having read it, it is true it is not necessarily a journal about Australain history, so I have no objection about the category being removed and I will consider removing the project tags.--

2272:

received the rather hostile responses above, although I now realize that most of the hostility I saw was just clumsy English. So I did realize that I had bit a newbie and I have said as much myself, but my

5057:(3) I'll try to dig it out when I get a mo. I don't think it makes much odds for monthly, but it's much clearer in numbers for, say, bimonthly, which variously means every two months and every two weeks. 1119:

Hi Guillaume2303, I wonder if you have had a change to review the most recent discussion on the "Delete Brief Chronicles" page and are willing to reconsider your vote in view of the discussion. Thanks --

2616:

simply for the sake of a public service. Were you, however, to support documenting the existence of this group, it would obviously carry more weight, and all the more so given a range of other factors.

378:

Also, I feel like an idiot for asking, but you say "use a section heading (e.g., by using the "+" tab at the top of this page)," and I don't see any "+" tab at the top of the page! What am I missing?

4748:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

975:

Hello, I saw where you seconded the ProD for this. Both ProD's have been removed. Would you care to nominate for AfD? I'm at work now, and shan't get back to it till tomorrow at the earliest. Cheers,

5141: 1046:

scientific community such as Croatia does not help the development of Knowledge (XXG), social sciences or the Internet, but, au contraire, it undermines it. With good faith in your understanding.

2784:

says the person is George E. Ponchak. I just wanted to point this out because maybe we are not sure at the moment who is the editor-in-chief. Of course you might know from your own experience.

4073:, and I wondered if that was correct. I should have asked you or someone else on the project about that. Somehow I totally missed the "weekly" for the frequency. Oh well live and learn. ---- 2433:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 505:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 4321: 2445: 2038: 4221:

I'm sorry to hear this as well, it would have been good to have your input. If you do have the time or inclination, I've started to add some text covering various usage issues relative to

3970:

editor), he can propose an article for deletion, a well-defined procedure to establish consensus within the community (note that "consensus" does not mean "unanimity"). Hope this helps. --

4245:

Finally, some relief from the constant prodding of not-notable journals!! ;-) Thank you, and please come back when you have more time or renewed interest.. or consider wiki-retirement at

662:

went against all these guidelines and I cleaned it up accordingly. I will do the same with the other lists that you mentioned as soon as I find time. Meanwhile, you should perhaps read

2387: 517: 3791:

Yes, I agree that your latest wording is slightly better. I have no wish to exclude JDS from the record, as I think it is relevant. But just wanted a fair picture to be given. Thanks

2444:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

2035:

Finally, editing while an article is under AfD is not only normal, it is encouraged, because by improving an article it may in the end turn out to be better to keep it than delete it.

516:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

302:

Should be better now, with publisher information, history, ISSNs/CODEN/OCLCs. Still a three-in-one article, covering journals that existed before the days of the online mega-indexes.

203:

Hi -- just a point of terminology, nothing to do with the issue. A statement can only be slander if it is spoken aloud. If it is written, it is libel rather than slander. Regards,

2972:. Same thing for other proper nouns of publications and societies; Swedish does not use "title case" the way English does. These proper nouns were all, I believe, fine as they were. 4006:, and searching Google books with the keywords "Organdi revue" or "Organdi quarterly" also produces results which can be interpreted as reliable secondary sources, at least tmho. -- 4481:

You're welcome and thanks for the kind words. WP was starting to take up too much of my time and I found it difficult to reduce, so I went "cold turkey"... Worked for a while... --

2131: 2891:

You're right, I've added them back. I should check whether one can have multiple OCLCs in journal infoboxes (one can have multiple ISSNs), that would provide a neater solution. --

5063:(5) In general I agree that only the Ed-in-chief should be listed; however in this case the journal is all about the lists -- which define updates to bacterial nomenclature, the 2775: 2342:. You'll see the same awards and impact factor presentation. Can you point me to a humanities or social science journal presentation that we can use as a standard going forward? 1457:

Guillaume2303, I hope your flight wasn't too bad. I just wanted to say that I appreciate your level-headedness in that discussion. Incidentally, I found it remarkable that I was

1421:

We interacted about something last year, although I cannot remember exactly what either. I think it was another journal, or perhaps the proposed journal notability guidelines. --

1169:

I agree with many of your edits. You have made many fine contributions to Knowledge (XXG). I have to say that you are wrong about one small set of edits related to this journal.

1071:. Neither DOAJ, nor CEEOL are very discriminating in their coverage, so neither shows notability for this journal. If you have other sources, please add them to the article. -- 3233: 916:

Well, then it looks like it is something that the Bluebook recommends what law journals use when they cite each other. I think we should then best stick to WP usage. Cheers,

4254: 218:

Thanks, I've learned something today! My English is pretty good, I think, but sometimes I still miss some of the intricacies (as my wife -she's American- can attest :-). --

5009: 3303: 3274: 3247: 3085:

user:ConcernedVancouverite has requested on these two. They seem to be similarly sourced and referenced to most of our journals. My hope had been that these could support

1105:

entry. I became a good friend through email with Douglass Brooks before he passed, and have a (long delayed) major article coming out in the forthcoming issue. Thanks. --

4885:

Thanks for the help. Although the second link is not a reliable source, it seems to present a good indicator that the abstracts database is no longer in existence. ----

3495:

BTW, I hope you don't mind, but I have your talk page on my watchlist, because interesting information regarding peer reviewed journals seems to show up on your page.

2277:

he created are, without any doubt, bad. Perhaps something good may come out of it, but not if he keeps insisting doing things his way. I have re-written, for example,

2068:

What preventing you from have some rest? Take your time, relax. World wouldn't stop if you would give yourself some wiki-vacation. My goal is to protect your nerves.

5054:(2) It makes a lot of sense to list all acronyms that are commonly used. In this case the ISO abbreviation is so long that it's almost always referred to as IJSEM. 4845:

Do you know anything about this journal and / or the abstracts database? I am guessing the database has been discontinued or is now part of some other entity. ----

4646: 4374:, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at 411:

Huh, I don't have a + but I have an A in the row of buttons starting with B, I, Ab... that creates a "Level 2 headline," which I never noticed before, so thanks!

2790:

does use MWCL as an abbreviation. So I am thinking it would be OK to put this in the info box. You can see the abbreviation right after the name in parenthesis.

1138:

If such is desired by you. I have no objection for this is the BACKYARD of your wikipedians. I am just trying to create an article about the journal I serve on,

4842:

of this PDF. However, when I searched for the AMR Abstracts Database, or Applied Mechanics Reviews abstracts database on Google I didn't turn up anything else.

4580: 2956:

Thanks, BTW, for some of the work you put into the article, but some of the changes seem rather unmotivated and need to be reverted. For example, the title is

3655:

It is normally considered inappropriate to list a book for a given footnote without a specific page cite where the datum that has been footnoted can be found.

4466:, even though you are--apparently--retired. I hope you're not really retired; I've always appreciated the work you do here, even when we disagreed. Groeten, 393:

No problem, "journal" and "magazine" get mixed up all the time. The +tab should be a tiny "+" just right from the "edit" button on the top of your screen. --

4591: 3954: 1645: 1205: 2306:

close on my talk p. I ventured to make a compromise close in this area, relying on the editors to actually merge a significant part of the material.

2108:"Your nomination for deletion a five articles ... will be considered as vandalism and treated correspondingly." What was that about "accus nobody"?-- 888:

The Bluebook has all publications in small caps. I see that some journals don't use it on their wikipedia pages, though the Iowa Law Review does.

1050: 254: 742:(hobbyists mainly) wanting to exchange insects. By the way, the current title of the article is "Insekten-Börse", perhaps it should be moved? -- 2357:

Hi Gleaman, thanks for bringing that article to my attention, as it urgently needs cleaning up. It does not adhere to several WP policies (see

1741:

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Knowledge (XXG), as you did to

3894:

Also, I apologize for not using the "+" per your instructions - I don't know how to do it or what it does, so I've just left my comments here.

4299:

which seems to imply the removal of all redirects from journal titles that do not have articles, might benefit from some yjpughts of yours'.

1666:

PS: I am not even sure this should be categorized as a journal. The publisher website lists these volumes as books with an ISBN. I will ask

1886:

It's not a hugely important deal to me, so I won't object if you put those links back. The above was just to explain why I removed them. --

941: 4002:) 12:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC) hi, and we shall see, crusader. before starting a deletion discussion just have a look at the following link 3511:

this journal are almost trivial (like JournalSeek), but the fact that there is an impact factor suggests that there is more, at least the

651: 4156:

Dr. Garan, good to be talking, which is more constructive than anonymous edit-warring. I have explained my reasons for reverting both to

3545:

PS: I just see that they use ManuscriptCentral for handling submissions, which they certainly wouldn't do if there was no peer review. --

3240: 1067:

There is obviously nothing against a Croatian journal being included in WP, but, like every other topic, it will have to comply with the

650:, which clearly states that external links should be avoided in the body of an article (and a list is also an article). In addition, the 4125:

No problem. I left a welcome template at that IP address, because I could of course not know that you were registered. Happy editing! --

3979: 3939: 2910:

rather unrealistic assumption. In any case, we can't know in advance which one will win out, so being able to list a few seems useful.

1510:

I suggest a deletion templates are not suitable for these articles. I hope, You'll change your mind, after You check them. Regards. --

3209:

Dear Guillaume2303, Thanks for your contribution on the above (and sorry I thought I had completed IJCS properly). I failed to get a

937: 183:

For the moment she has stopped editing. Thanks for the offer, if she starts again and becomes too annoying, I'll drop you a a note. --

97: 2408: 480: 3649: 3106:

Alternatively, if you can show that the journal is indexed in the more important sociology databases, then that would help, too. --

3089:

who is up for deletion as he was formerly Chief Editor. Would you have any suggestions as to how to address the tags? Best wishes, (

89: 84: 72: 67: 62: 2212: 2162: 2049:

If you would care to read the Manual of Style, yoou would see that it clearly says that academic titles and such should not be used

1315:

I am inclined to give it considerable tolerance as the only science journal in a minority language. Is there somewhere to merge?

4920:

Combinatorial approaches to biomaterial development (combinatorial? must be a new science discipline I haven't heard of yet :: -->

4737: 4556:

I go cross-eyed looking at histories sometimes. Luckily thanks are not dimished by duplication; good job the both of you :) -

2658:

Good idea. Personally, I'd be inclined to follow whatever DGG proposes also myself. I don't want to disagree with you or him, I

4594:

is not policy. I'm not particularly arguing that this pair are notable yet, but they seem to merit their week at AfD. Regards,

3187: 3077: 1619:? The GJ is mostly, though not exclusively, a German-language publication and it is definitely a scholarly periodical. Regards 4867:). So it looks like it doesn't exist any more (although the message board thing is not a reliable source for WP, of course. -- 3587:

so both work, although as far as I can tell there is no consensus for the use of either except for species/genera articles. –

945: 4778: 4250: 2781:

says the person is Prof. C-K Clive Tzuang. Scrolling to the bottom the page has been last updated: 2010-01-02. But this page

2620:

Group's own work which is reported, and their reviews of the work of others, are of the highest standard in their own field.

958: 349: 308: 270: 5048:

Sorry, didn't respond to your talkback I've been busy with creating non-journal articles and tend to be a bit monofocused.

4964:

different than yours. In any case, you did fast work on this one. This time the race was won by the swiftest (Ecc 9:11).----

4390: 4046:. It's not perfect, and I can see why people had COI concerns on the editing history, but it isn't purely promotional spam.— 2208: 2203: 2158: 2153: 1718: 1012:

Thanks, so I noticed. Let's see what he ends up with before going to AfD, perhaps a decent article can be made after all. --

143:

If you disagree with my actions, you can start an RfC (request for comments) to see what the community thinks about this. --

3662:

I do not want an edit war with you. I do want Knowledge (XXG) guidelines and policies to be followed. Any suggestions? --

3351:

expert but if one hasn't come along after five years I don't imagine one will come along now, anyway thanks for you work.

2568: 904: 860: 816: 2426: 614:. I think this is not correct, as the links you removed are used in the same way on other Knowledge (XXG) pages, such as 498: 4586: 3986:) 12:40, 19 April 2010 (UTC) Just checked that I was working in a window where I did not sign in. here is my signature-- 172: 4394: 4360: 2230: 2180: 1746: 5060:(4) This one I'm fairly easy on -- perhaps we could define it, for the benefit of those who know SGM, but not use it? 4463: 3191: 3081: 1926:

It looks not so fair, your edits while the article is being discussed for deletion. If you don't revert it by writing

1361: 3841: 2983:

I will keep out of the article right now as others are working on it, but will get back to it in a couple of days. --

1173:

is a scientific journal insofar as the journal is devoted to the impact of social conditions on human health. It is

41: 4367: 1742: 5073: 4826: 4681: 4655: 4635: 4618: 4600: 3796: 3777: 3738: 3718: 3520: 2741: 2671: 2628: 2540: 2500: 4297: 3845: 3677:

I have reverted myself to the last version edited by you except for some minor tweaks. Is that what you mean? --

2363: 2362:

are brought to AfD. I would do something about the "notable contributors" list, though. There is something like

2278: 1789:

I'll search. Perhaps it's in one of the sub-manuals derived from MOS. Can't do that tonight any more, though. --

442: 434: 5094: 4907:(How do you like this section title?) Sometimes a scientific journal's own description can be surprising with: 4802: 4513: 3658:

It is normally considered inappropriate to place a book in a footnote if you have not examined the book itself.

2932: 1379: 659: 654:

clearly says "Knowledge (XXG) is not a link collection and an article comprising only links is contrary to the

2623:

Anyway, I'm sure you hear what I'm asking. I'd love to hear your thoughts on how we might be able to proceed.

4069:. Apparently I was asleep at the wheel on that one. I did notice before that this article got categorized as 3983: 3943: 2579:

You may also have noticed that I found the proceedings of the Origen Research Group were not only indexed at

2430: 2412: 1930:

information about experts and Wallach's interview about how he created the character - I will consider it as

5130: 4984: 4948: 4872: 4698: 4543: 4486: 4330: 4170: 4130: 4094: 4066: 4027: 3999: 3975: 3753: 3682: 3608: 3550: 3532: 3523:

for an example. Most of the information included in that article got there from suggestions that I got from

3370: 3339: 3167: 3111: 3035: 3015: 3006:

understood it to source the persons and thought that the "Stockholm-centric" remark constituted unallowable

2896: 2850: 2755: 2647: 2519: 2395: 2372: 2287: 2199: 2113: 2055:

I did not remove it so please start being a bit more careful, as you seem to be so fond of reminding others.

2021: 1891: 1852: 1830: 1794: 1691: 1675: 1653: 1624: 1596: 1561: 1530: 1489: 1426: 1338: 1298: 1244: 1213: 1076: 1017: 1001: 981: 921: 878: 833: 782: 747: 710: 671: 398: 328: 291: 223: 188: 164: 148: 50: 17: 4207:

Sorry to see this Guillaume2303, always a shame to lose valued editors. Best wishes to you on your voyage.

4115: 3935: 2434: 1055: 892: 848: 804: 663: 506: 5104: 4375: 3826: 3512: 2612:

the journal, since reliable sources on the group are easier to find than sources specific to the journal.

2592:. Origen wrote a great deal of commentary on the Song, much of which survives in a old Latin translation. 565: 4356: 4258: 2216: 2166: 2149: 1916: 1714: 1494: 1033: 690:

and serve a different purpose, as use in several hundred Knowledge (XXG) Lists of ... journals indicate.

5126: 4980: 4969: 4944: 4933: 4890: 4868: 4850: 4694: 4539: 4482: 4428: 4166: 4126: 4090: 4078: 4023: 3995: 3971: 3749: 3726: 3706: 3678: 3604: 3581: 3546: 3528: 3500: 3366: 3335: 3163: 3107: 3031: 3011: 2915: 2892: 2877: 2846: 2832: 2805: 2795: 2751: 2643: 2515: 2391: 2368: 2283: 2091: 2017: 1887: 1848: 1826: 1790: 1709:

Dear colleague. Your nomination for deletion a five articles in my edition, together with supporting of

1671: 1649: 1592: 1557: 1526: 1422: 1334: 1294: 1240: 1209: 1072: 1013: 917: 874: 829: 778: 743: 706: 695: 667: 636: 502: 484: 416: 394: 383: 324: 287: 219: 184: 144: 132: 4745: 4359:

on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a

2469:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 2194: 2144: 1844: 1686:

Not sure myself. Nothing really fits, perhaps History journal is the least worst category. You decide.

996: 976: 541:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 375:

article; I had Russian on my brain, so I was thinking of "journal" in the Russian sense of 'magazine.'

163:

If they really start being disruptive, your friendly neighbourhood admin will be happy to lend a hand.

4758:}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ 4111: 1644:

before I had thought of an appropriate subcategory. Have a look at the different subcategories in the

1142:, which might be of some interest of some, of course not all, physicians and biomedical researchers. 5068: 4676: 4650: 4630: 4613: 4595: 4448: 4405: 4267: 4212: 3792: 3773: 3734: 3571: 3392: 3356: 3320: 2866:

For googlebook pages, there is usually a "Find in a library" link that can be helpful to researchers.

2737: 2667: 2624: 2536: 2496: 2487:

I'm impressed to see the effort you made to bring an article you thought sub-standard up to standard.

2474: 2273: 2240: 2099: 1990: 1954: 1939: 1759: 1726: 1581: 1546: 1515: 546: 4400:

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

2051:- if you would care to read it, you would see that there is not a single word about academic titles. 1822: 969: 5090: 5034: 4797: 4561: 4524: 4371: 4186:

more discussion. I think that might have a calming effect and help ease sorting all of this out. --

4011: 3991: 3315:

hi, just wondered if you saw the thread at the BLPN, also do you intend to add any more citations?

1369: 1124: 1110: 564:

here. See my comment in the article's talk page: this award reminds me of the crapola I discovered

438: 2343: 1949:

You have another option - to withdrawn your nominations instead of my previous recommendation. --

896: 852: 808: 5026: 4774: 4326: 3913: 3895: 3459: 3446: 3432: 3417: 3296: 3289: 3267: 3260: 2303: 2262: 2109: 1687: 1636: 1620: 1504: 1499: 954: 241: 208: 3007: 2863:

tend to use them in citations only when the newer linkages are not to freely available versions.

615: 112: 3884:

Thanks for the cleanup. Please see its talk page for some general comments and clarifications.

2782: 2731:

I look forward to hearing what you discover at Princeton. That is verification at its best! :))

2000:

that is another matter). Second, if you care to look, you will see that in my edit summaries I

5153: 4281: 4235: 4192: 3887:

The journal is in fact quite active. The web page has now indicated its publication schedule.

3822: 3730: 3646: 3626: 3592: 3470: 3199: 3150: 3094: 3057: 2988: 2947: 2692:

I am however not sure about the nature of the journal. Based on the material available online,

2347: 2044:

and now trying to proove its notability by removing evidences of notability? Well, well, well.

1153: 900: 856: 812: 764: 731: 587: 470: 4382: 4003: 2750:

That's fine with me. Meanwhile you could start the article on the group in your userspace. --

1266:

from the category scientific journals I am not going to dispute you. I insist, however, that

354: 313: 275: 5115: 4965: 4929: 4886: 4846: 4755: 4535: 4500: 4471: 4424: 4074: 3917: 3899: 3869: 3853: 3702: 3667: 3496: 3427:

I accept there is no such thing as Australian entomology, but there is Australian history.--

3122:

No I couldn't find it in SCI or an impact factor - there doesn't seem to be much from Korea.

2911: 2873: 2828: 2791: 2455:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1906: 1876: 1809: 1779: 1640: 1467: 1444: 1408: 1392: 1275: 1228: 1194: 1093: 691: 632: 527:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

450: 412: 379: 128: 4386: 2466: 2456: 2449: 2438: 2358: 2005: 1982:

First, You can optimize it by `div class`-options or hide it instead of delete it. Second,

1139: 655: 538: 528: 521: 510: 5157: 5134: 5119: 5098: 5078: 5038: 5002: 4995: 4988: 4973: 4952: 4937: 4894: 4876: 4854: 4820: 4808: 4782: 4702: 4686: 4660: 4640: 4623: 4605: 4565: 4547: 4528: 4504: 4490: 4475: 4452: 4444: 4432: 4409: 4401: 4344: 4334: 4310: 4285: 4271: 4240: 4216: 4208: 4197: 4174: 4134: 4119: 4098: 4082: 4055: 4031: 4015: 3921: 3903: 3873: 3857: 3830: 3800: 3781: 3757: 3742: 3712: 3686: 3671: 3630: 3612: 3596: 3554: 3536: 3504: 3474: 3450: 3436: 3421: 3396: 3388: 3384: 3374: 3360: 3352: 3343: 3331: 3324: 3316: 3203: 3171: 3154: 3115: 3101:) PS: I did look for some more sources for Global Policy but haven't found anything yet. 3098: 3061: 3039: 3019: 2992: 2951: 2921: 2900: 2883: 2854: 2838: 2799: 2759: 2745: 2710: 2675: 2651: 2632: 2544: 2523: 2504: 2478: 2470: 2399: 2376: 2351: 2317: 2291: 2265: 2244: 2236: 2103: 2095: 2072:

If you would stop accusing people and yell "vandalism" at everybody who disagrees with you

2025: 1994: 1986: 1977: 1973: 1958: 1950: 1943: 1935: 1910: 1895: 1880: 1856: 1834: 1813: 1798: 1783: 1763: 1755: 1730: 1722: 1695: 1679: 1657: 1628: 1600: 1585: 1577: 1565: 1550: 1542: 1534: 1519: 1511: 1471: 1448: 1430: 1412: 1396: 1373: 1357: 1342: 1326: 1302: 1279: 1248: 1232: 1217: 1198: 1157: 1128: 1114: 1080: 1059: 1021: 1006: 986: 963: 925: 908: 882: 864: 837: 820: 786: 768: 751: 735: 714: 699: 675: 640: 599: 595: 581: 577: 550: 542: 474: 454: 420: 402: 387: 358: 332: 317: 295: 279: 245: 227: 212: 192: 177: 152: 136: 4162: 3963: 3953:

for the general criteria about what is considered notable enough to merit an article and

2778:

regarding the editor in chief of this publication. The link from the Society page here:

2224: 2220: 2174: 2170: 686: 682: 647: 340: 2693: 1223:

I made the change. I rarely disagree with your edits. This may have been the first time.

685:. I agree with you that Knowledge (XXG) articles should not include external links. But 5030: 4861: 4836: 4759: 4557: 4520: 4043: 4007: 3987: 2094:?? You two pretending to be a whole Knowledge (XXG)? Perfect! No further questions. -- 1365: 1120: 1106: 619: 116: 5067:

of the journal -- so it seems to make sense additionally to include the Lists Editor.

4022:

this should be taken to AfD ("articles for deletion"), not why this should be kept. --

3959: 3950: 2425:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

2188: 2138: 1825:

covers it, although I also remember a more specific mention. I'll continue looking. --

1751: 1737: 1185:

is not a healthcare journal. I would like to hear from you before I make a change in

1068: 497:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

4770: 4419:

Hello. First let me say, welcome back. Are you semi-retired, or back in full swing?

4306: 4109:

Hi, I'm registered user, but sometimes I forget to log in and left unsigned changes.

4051: 3442: 3428: 3413: 3086: 2706: 2589: 2459:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

2313: 2256: 1322: 992: 950: 759:

Geller-Grimm if he can dig something up in the state libraries.Many thanks Robert aka

531:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

344: 303: 265: 237: 204: 4578:

Hi Guillaume2303 -- I've removed a couple of prods of yours on biomedical journals (

2598: 1713:

in his actions against these articles, instead of editing it, will be considered as

5149: 4277: 4231: 4188: 3622: 3588: 3466: 3195: 3146: 3090: 3053: 2984: 2943: 1149: 760: 727: 623: 466: 120: 4720: 2787:

While I am here :), I wanted to point out that the link to letters from this page

2514:

up on it. As long as he keeps doing that, I think the article is beyond hope... --

2012:

be used. Finally, editing while an article is under AfD is not only normal, it is

1556:

material for a real article because all they are now is just a bunch of trivia. --

5111: 4496: 4467: 3865: 3849: 3663: 2339: 1902: 1872: 1805: 1775: 1463: 1440: 1404: 1388: 1271: 1224: 1190: 446: 49:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4389:, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see 3733:

archaeology, linguistics, literature, "pure" theology (i.e. doctrine), ethics.

2418: 2386:

no really good example out there. I think that the best advice is still in the

490: 441:

article. This journal is published in Estonia, so accordingly it fits into the

4246: 2087: 2058: 1969: 1710: 611: 591: 573: 4370:

to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only

3909: 2662:

the hard work both of you do. The ARC have made it hard for me to give up on

2490:

It would appear others agree with you, that it is beyond hope, but who knows.

932:

British Journal of Cardiac Nursing and British Journal of Community Nursing ‎

4226: 4157: 3818: 3515:. Even if you don't have a subscription, you can check that by going to the 2788: 2779: 2571:

to my userspace here, so you can see it. The main point is, of course, that

1931: 610:

Dear Guillaume2303, On Febr. 3, 2010, you again removed external links from

2008:, yoou would see that it clearly says that academic titles and such should 4276:

Best wishes for your retirement and many thanks for your kind assistance (

2219:

among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek

2169:

among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek

286:

journal database, but it is still a bare stub and hardly informative... --

4301: 4047: 3524: 2701: 2639: 2308: 1667: 1317: 236:

This point is one that many native English speakers get wrong. Regards,

4222: 3912:. The copyright is held by JMASM, Inc., so I agree it may be confusing. 3652:, contains a great deal more that just the datum for a single footnote. 774: 5022: 3001:

not listed in journal articles. Thanks for the note about capitals. I

627: 260:

Mind running your magic on it again? It seems the journal was renamed

124: 4741: 4262: 3516: 2584: 3330:

No, I did not see that as the link you give on the talkpage goes to

1145:

Admitted: YES, I have conflict of interest. So I leave it to you.

1042: 1038: 343:

prohibits. Fact finding is different than analysis and synthesis.

5110:

Thanks for your help there. It is a pleasure to work with you!

4914:

Biomaterial surface science linking structure to biocompatibility

4381:

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

2774:

Hello. I want to point out a discrepancy that I came across with

5142:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Tia Keyes (2nd nomination)

4229:, any feedback would be appreciated. Best wishes, and thanks, -- 3030:

PS: I have copied this discussion to the article's talk page. --

2580: 1032:

Dear Guillaume2303! I see that you have proposed the article on

1356:

Thanks for adding some additional material to the new entry on

773:

I know, I used to be a taxonomist myself in my early days (see

2211:. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to 2161:. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to 616:

http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_scientific_journals_in_biology

113:

http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_scientific_journals_in_biology

28: 4924:

Processing of biomaterials to achieve specific functionality.

3127:

Han'guk Sahoehak/Korean Journal of Sociology, 1225-0120, Core

2446:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Church (TV personality)

1360:. You may be interested in this, which I just created today: 646:

Dear JosephDamen, having all those external links is against

433:

Hi, Guillaume2303. I would like to ask the reason of removal

5012:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

4994: 4343: 3842:

Knowledge (XXG):Citing sources#Identifying parts of a source

3306:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3288: 3277:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3259: 3250:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3232: 2823:

archives, and I must say it left a very positive impression.

2417: 1097:

for deletion as lacking "notability." Here is my response:

489: 4393:). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found 3076:

Dear Guillaume2303, hi. Thanks for your work on these two:

3072:

Korean Sociological Association/Korean Journal of Sociology

2388:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide

518:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Rejuvenation Research

4322:

American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese

3217:

on Gil-Sung Park. Best wishes (23:21, 8 April 2010 (UTC))

2493:

Your editorial actions here strike me as exemplary. Bravo!

2004:

explain why I do something. If you would care to read the

4649:, as that's probably a better place for this discussion. 4495:

Yes, it has had those effects on me too. A la prochaine,

4261:, or I'll be happy to set up a transcription project for 2734:

Shall we defer action until Dave's return from Princeton?

1717:

and treated correspondingly. It has nothing to deal with

4534:

You're welcome, although in fairness I have to say that

4792: 3698: 2819: 1983: 1616: 1385: 620:

http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_bioinformatics_journals

561: 117:

http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_bioinformatics_journals

3484:

Geez, that is a long name for an annual publication.

3125:

The only thing I have found like this is: This entry:

2599:

Origen on the Song of songs as the spirit of scripture

1262:

journals). Although I disagree, if you want to remove

1091:

Hi Guillaume2303. I believe it was you who nominated

5160:) ps (I have also written about this to Xxanthippe) 4366:

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

2776:

IEEE Microwave Theory and Wireless Components Letters

2223:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 2173:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 262:

International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy

3131:

Sociological Abstracts - Current Serials Source List

2066:

Dear SerdechnyG, you're starting to get on my nerves

624:

http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_ornithology_journals

121:

http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_ornithology_journals

4943::-) Yep, not something to put in a WP article... -- 4443:

editors in chief are inherently notable. Thanks.--

3748:

Hi Alastair: I have responded on that talk page. --

3241:

Talk:Technology Innovations in Statistics Education

2583:, but reviews of the proceedings had been indexed. 705:

Obviously, I disagree. This is not common sense. --

4647:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Academic Journals 3383:Yes I saw. Thank you for your improvements to the 2484:I had a look at the page history for this article. 2340:http://en.wikipedia.org/Journal_of_Business_Ethics 4903:Promotional verbiage vaguely dentoting attributes 4754:To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ 4713:For someone who's retired you seem to be busy :) 4519:Good job on that article - it looks great now. - 2215:to work towards wording and content that gains a 2165:to work towards wording and content that gains a 5001:Hello, Guillaume2303. You have new messages at 4917:modeling applied to capture biomaterial behavior 4860:This is not a field I am familiar with. I found 4818:If you look at the abstracting and indexing for 4265:that of historical importance to your research) 3295:Hello, Guillaume2303. You have new messages at 3266:Hello, Guillaume2303. You have new messages at 3239:Hello, Guillaume2303. You have new messages at 612:http://en.wikipedia.org/African_studies_journals 4320:Hello there. I noticed that you reassigned the 4065:I am glad you caught those category errors for 4736:Just wanted to thank you for your help on the 4629:academic but exist to publish pseudoscience). 4592:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (academic journals) 3701:. I've commented at the article talk. Cheers, 3480:IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 936:As you suggested, I have undone my reverts to 4581:Journal of Surgical Technique and Case Report 3880:Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 3465:Blimey that was quick - nice work, thanks! – 3387:BLP. It is really appreciated. Best regards. 1648:and see if you find something appropriate. -- 8: 3186:Dear Guillaume2303 - Could you help unmerge 2603:. Oxford theological monographs. OUP, 2005. 1646:Category:Academic journals by subject area 1206:Category:Academic journals by subject area 1204:Thanks for your kind words. Have a look at 873:which case we should stick to WP usage)? -- 777:). Now I teach tricks to mice... Wim :-) -- 4351:Hello. Your account has been granted the " 3910:http://www.coe.wayne.edu/COE/Projects.html 2198:according to the reverts you have made on 2148:according to the reverts you have made on 628:http://en.wikipedia.org/Chemistry_journals 125:http://en.wikipedia.org/Chemistry_journals 2942:this article needs to be "cleaned up"? -- 2192:You currently appear to be engaged in an 2142:You currently appear to be engaged in an 4911:Hypothesis-driven design of biomaterials 2601:: the bridegroom's perfect marriage-song 2227:. Please stop the disruption, otherwise 2177:. Please stop the disruption, otherwise 2042:"No indication of notability whatsoever" 946:Category:United Kingdom nursing journals 465:journals", where it belongs. Thanks. -- 2465:This is an automatic notification by a 2330:I've been modeling the information for 1525:Sorry, but I'm not really convinced. -- 1051:User:Centar za politoloska istrazivanja 537:This is an automatic notification by a 264:in 1972, and was published until 1985. 255:The International Journal of Psychiatry 2859:Great. I should have EL'd them myself. 828:Good point, I didn't notice that... -- 47:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2086:you are talking about. Let me guess. 1985:. I suggest no further questions. -- 1164:Journal of Health and Social Behavior 800:Thanks for your other edits though. 556:Ersatz "notability" via vanity award? 7: 2334:on the Knowledge (XXG) page for the 1670:, who is a librarian, for advice. -- 1439:I'm already tired of Shakespeare... 1257:is a scientific journal the way the 942:British Journal of Community Nursing 656:"what Knowledge (XXG) is not" policy 4830:is listed there. At the ASME site 3517:Thomson-Reuters journal master list 2078:. And please reveal: who are these 1270:not be termed a healthcare journal. 938:British Journal of Cardiac Nursing 24: 5021:Would you please weigh in at the 4391:Knowledge (XXG):Reviewing process 4363:scheduled to end 15 August 2010. 4165:. A 2003 abstract won't do it. -- 3955:WP:Notability (academic journals) 3162:I thnk it is enough. Good job! -- 2666:though. Sorry to be such a bore. 2642:opinion. I'll get back to you. -- 1181:is more of a healthcare journal. 944:, and I have tagged the category 4928:Whew! What are they selling? --- 4719: 4538:did most of the hard work :-) -- 4415:Houston, we (may) have a problem 4071:Publications established in 1982 2187: 2137: 1750: 1736: 1290:American Journal of Epidemiology 1259:American Journal of Epidemiology 32: 4296:I think the discussion at RfD: 4004:social science research network 3188:Korean Sociological Association 3078:Korean Sociological Association 4795:. Thanks for the cats though. 339:It's not OR in the sense that 1: 4355:" userright, allowing you to 4075:Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) 3497:Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) 3145:Is that enough? Best wishes ( 2792:Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) 2213:discuss controversial changes 2163:discuss controversial changes 1022:11:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC) 1007:11:07, 28 February 2010 (UTC) 987:02:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC) 964:18:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC) 926:15:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 909:15:46, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 883:15:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 865:15:26, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 838:15:25, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 821:15:21, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 787:15:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 769:15:32, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 752:15:06, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 736:14:59, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 715:14:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 700:14:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 676:13:40, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 641:13:25, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 600:15:45, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 582:12:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 551:01:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 371:I appreciate your moving the 4587:Journal of Young Pharmacists 3946:) 12:00, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3492:assume that it must be so. 2978:Tidskrift för konstvetenskap 2302:There's a discussion on the 1743:In the high attention area 2 475:17:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 455:16:55, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 421:19:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 403:16:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 388:15:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 359:16:39, 6 February 2010 (UTC) 333:16:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC) 318:14:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC) 296:13:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC) 280:06:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC) 246:16:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC) 228:16:40, 2 February 2010 (UTC) 213:16:37, 2 February 2010 (UTC) 193:07:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 178:22:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC) 153:15:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC) 137:12:59, 25 January 2010 (UTC) 4464:The Church Quarterly Review 4163:independent reliable source 3365:I added a few more refs. -- 3192:Korean Journal of Sociology 3140:Where "Core" is defiend as 3082:Korean Journal of Sociology 2439:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 2429:. The nominated article is 1028:Contemporary Issues journal 681:Dear Guillaume2303, I know 511:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 501:. The nominated article is 5174: 5158:16:22, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 5135:15:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 5120:15:35, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 5099:19:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC) 4372:a small number of articles 4099:06:47, 30 April 2010 (UTC) 4083:21:44, 29 April 2010 (UTC) 4056:00:29, 22 April 2010 (UTC) 4042:I declined your speedy on 4032:15:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 4016:14:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3922:15:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 3904:14:50, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 3874:09:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 3858:09:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 3831:17:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 3801:15:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 3782:10:27, 16 April 2010 (UTC) 3758:08:27, 16 April 2010 (UTC) 3743:05:42, 16 April 2010 (UTC) 3713:18:02, 15 April 2010 (UTC) 3687:06:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC) 3672:01:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC) 3631:19:21, 13 April 2010 (UTC) 3613:15:14, 13 April 2010 (UTC) 3597:13:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC) 3555:08:40, 13 April 2010 (UTC) 3537:08:30, 13 April 2010 (UTC) 3505:05:19, 13 April 2010 (UTC) 3475:15:32, 12 April 2010 (UTC) 3451:14:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC) 3437:14:14, 12 April 2010 (UTC) 3422:13:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC) 3397:20:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC) 3375:20:33, 11 April 2010 (UTC) 3361:20:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC) 3344:19:58, 11 April 2010 (UTC) 3325:19:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC) 2922:18:21, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 2901:17:03, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 2884:16:58, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 2855:16:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 2839:15:20, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 2815:Thank you for the cleanup. 2800:13:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 2760:10:16, 23 March 2010 (UTC) 2746:07:47, 23 March 2010 (UTC) 2711:06:00, 23 March 2010 (UTC) 2676:14:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC) 2652:10:14, 22 March 2010 (UTC) 2633:07:08, 21 March 2010 (UTC) 2545:13:57, 22 March 2010 (UTC) 2524:13:16, 21 March 2010 (UTC) 2505:07:10, 21 March 2010 (UTC) 2479:01:16, 20 March 2010 (UTC) 2435:Knowledge (XXG):Notability 2400:13:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC) 2377:21:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC) 2352:19:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC) 2336:Journal of Business Ethics 2318:17:51, 18 March 2010 (UTC) 2292:08:05, 17 March 2010 (UTC) 2266:23:29, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 2245:19:48, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 2104:17:20, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 2026:19:46, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 1995:18:09, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 1978:17:56, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 1959:17:35, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 1944:17:32, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 1911:20:29, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 1896:19:37, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 1881:17:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 1857:15:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 1835:14:56, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 1814:18:54, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 1799:18:50, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 1784:18:47, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 1764:14:21, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 1731:14:21, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 1696:17:25, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 1680:17:16, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 1658:17:11, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 1629:17:00, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 1601:14:24, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 1586:13:17, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 1566:13:06, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 1551:12:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 1535:12:48, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 1520:09:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 1177:a healthcare journal. The 507:Knowledge (XXG):Notability 443:category:Estonian journals 435:category:Estonian journals 5079:14:29, 31 July 2010 (UTC) 5039:20:52, 30 July 2010 (UTC) 4989:13:20, 29 July 2010 (UTC) 4974:13:16, 29 July 2010 (UTC) 4953:16:33, 28 July 2010 (UTC) 4938:14:47, 28 July 2010 (UTC) 4895:13:17, 28 July 2010 (UTC) 4877:08:24, 28 July 2010 (UTC) 4855:06:28, 28 July 2010 (UTC) 4832:Applied Mechanics Reviews 4827:Applied Mechanics Reviews 4814:Applied Mechanics Reviews 4809:01:14, 28 July 2010 (UTC) 4783:14:49, 23 July 2010 (UTC) 4740:page. has given you some 4725: 4718: 4703:08:07, 23 July 2010 (UTC) 4687:07:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC) 4661:01:13, 22 July 2010 (UTC) 4641:01:01, 22 July 2010 (UTC) 4624:23:34, 21 July 2010 (UTC) 4606:23:27, 21 July 2010 (UTC) 4566:17:18, 16 July 2010 (UTC) 4548:12:15, 16 July 2010 (UTC) 4529:10:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC) 4453:16:42, 28 June 2010 (UTC) 4433:03:53, 27 June 2010 (UTC) 4410:03:22, 17 June 2010 (UTC) 4357:review other users' edits 3719:List of theology journals 3521:Genes, Brain and Behavior 3204:14:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 3172:12:34, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 3155:10:25, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 3116:09:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 3099:09:02, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 3062:16:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 3040:13:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 3020:12:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 2993:15:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC) 2952:05:30, 7 April 2010 (UTC) 2938:Could you please explain 2452:with four tildes (~~~~). 2332:Business Ethics Quarterly 2323:Business Ethics Quarterly 1472:23:08, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 1449:01:41, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 1431:07:23, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 1413:01:58, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 1397:15:56, 1 March 2010 (UTC) 1374:13:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 1343:08:12, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 1327:00:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 1303:17:24, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 1280:17:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 1249:08:39, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 1233:02:03, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 1218:21:13, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1199:21:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1158:16:50, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 1129:04:26, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 1115:16:57, 1 March 2010 (UTC) 1081:10:18, 1 March 2010 (UTC) 1060:09:58, 1 March 2010 (UTC) 524:with four tildes (~~~~). 4959:Materials and Structures 4514:Mathematical Programming 4505:17:18, 6 July 2010 (UTC) 4491:17:05, 6 July 2010 (UTC) 4476:17:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC) 4376:Special:OldReviewedPages 4335:12:56, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 4311:03:25, 5 June 2010 (UTC) 4286:14:53, 10 May 2010 (UTC) 4259:On the Origin of Species 4145:Dear Dr. Guillaume2303, 3527:, who is a librarian. -- 2933:Konsthistorisk tidskrift 1380:The Shakespeare Yearbook 1103:The Shakespeare Yearbook 660:African studies journals 606:African Studies Journals 106:African Studies Journals 4645:I've dropped a note at 4272:11:53, 5 May 2010 (UTC) 4241:01:29, 4 May 2010 (UTC) 4217:10:16, 3 May 2010 (UTC) 4198:20:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC) 4175:20:06, 1 May 2010 (UTC) 4135:11:50, 1 May 2010 (UTC) 4120:11:46, 1 May 2010 (UTC) 4067:Applied Physics Express 4061:Applied Physics Express 2431:Church (TV personality) 2413:Church (TV personality) 2200:Chris Adams (Character) 1639:, even though it is an 1490:Chris Adams (Character) 562:you were onto something 18:User talk:Guillaume2303 5105:Foundations of Science 4999: 4837:AMR Abstracts Database 4462:...for helping out on 4348: 4340:You are now a Reviewer 4255:Philosophie zoologique 4105:109.165.174.183 notion 3513:Science Citation Index 3293: 3264: 3237: 2980:) published in Lund. 2596:King, J. Christopher. 2422: 2074:- I had acused nobody 1617:removed these two cats 494: 4998: 4824:you will notice that 4347: 3727:cultural anthropology 3292: 3263: 3236: 2806:Psychiatric Quarterly 2457:articles for deletion 2421: 1069:notability guidelines 529:articles for deletion 503:Rejuvenation Research 493: 485:Rejuvenation Research 367:Thanks and a question 45:of past discussions. 3840:The guideline is at 3563:Template:Italictitle 3228:TISE tags - talkback 2448:. Please be sure to 520:. Please be sure to 199:slander versus libel 5023:Examples discussion 4316:Article class: stub 3908:Please check this: 3693:Garrison and Morton 3460:Hispania (journal) 3407:Australian journals 2820:readded and revised 2150:Calvera (Character) 2037:- it's normal when 1917:Calvera (Character) 1572:I mean, discuss it 1495:Calvera (Character) 1034:Contemporary Issues 439:Oil Shale (journal) 429:Oil Shale (journal) 159:User:Sandra.dandrea 5027:Talk:Fringe theory 5010:remove this notice 5000: 4744:! Cookies promote 4590:) on grounds that 4349: 4292:journal discussion 3812:Medical Hypotheses 3304:remove this notice 3297:Talk:Global Policy 3294: 3275:remove this notice 3268:Talk:Global Policy 3265: 3248:remove this notice 3238: 2811:Hi Guillaume2303, 2450:sign your comments 2423: 2327:Hi Guillaume2303, 2221:dispute resolution 2171:dispute resolution 1637:scientific journal 1611:Gutenberg-Jahrbuch 1505:Django (character) 1353:Hi Guillaume2303, 1179:Journal of Nursing 1134:Go ahead delete it 795:Fordham Law Review 522:sign your comments 495: 5077: 5003:Svick's talk page 4767: 4766: 4685: 4659: 4639: 4622: 4604: 4574:Academic journals 4141:Phenome/Phenomics 3938:comment added by 3927:Organdi quarterly 3836:Pinpoint citation 3817:I have responded 3731:Ancient Near East 3711: 3621:Noted, thanks. – 3052:Replied there. -- 2920: 2882: 2845:external link. -- 2837: 2304:Bernardo O'Reilly 2209:three-revert rule 2204:three-revert rule 2159:three-revert rule 2154:three-revert rule 1901:Thanks very much. 1615:Hi. Why have you 1500:Bernardo O'Reilly 1362:Famous Victories 995:is fixing it up. 948:for deletion. ‎ 912: 895:comment added by 868: 851:comment added by 824: 807:comment added by 103: 102: 57: 56: 51:current talk page 5165: 5071: 5013: 4807: 4805: 4723: 4716: 4715: 4679: 4653: 4633: 4616: 4598: 4536:User:Steve Quinn 4354: 4270: 4239: 4196: 4152:Steven A. Garan 3947: 3709: 3705: 3703:User:LeadSongDog 3586: 3580: 3576: 3570: 3307: 3278: 3251: 2918: 2914: 2912:User:LeadSongDog 2880: 2876: 2874:User:LeadSongDog 2835: 2831: 2829:User:LeadSongDog 2261: 2202:. Note that the 2191: 2152:. Note that the 2141: 2057:You didn't. But 1754: 1740: 1641:academic journal 1349:Famous Victories 1094:Brief Chronicles 1087:Brief Chronicles 1063: 1004: 999: 984: 979: 962: 911: 889: 867: 845: 823: 801: 175: 171: 167: 81: 59: 58: 36: 35: 29: 5173: 5172: 5168: 5167: 5166: 5164: 5163: 5162: 5145: 5125:My pleasure! -- 5108: 5086: 5069:Espresso Addict 5046: 5044:IJSEM revisited 5019: 5017:Opinion request 5014: 5007: 4961: 4905: 4821:Acta Materialia 4816: 4803: 4796: 4790: 4749: 4711: 4677:Espresso Addict 4673: 4651:Espresso Addict 4631:Espresso Addict 4614:Espresso Addict 4596:Espresso Addict 4576: 4517: 4460: 4440: 4417: 4361:two-month trial 4352: 4342: 4318: 4294: 4268:John Vandenberg 4266: 4251:Systema naturae 4230: 4205: 4187: 4183: 4143: 4107: 4063: 4040: 3933: 3929: 3882: 3838: 3815: 3793:PointOfPresence 3774:PointOfPresence 3766: 3735:Alastair Haines 3722: 3707: 3695: 3641: 3584: 3578: 3574: 3568: 3565: 3482: 3463: 3409: 3385:Joseph Sambrook 3332:Joseph Sambrook 3313: 3308: 3301: 3279: 3272: 3257: 3252: 3245: 3230: 3074: 2966:Konsthistorisk 2958:Konsthistorisk 2936: 2916: 2878: 2833: 2809: 2772: 2770:Editor in chief 2738:Alastair Haines 2668:Alastair Haines 2625:Alastair Haines 2557: 2537:Alastair Haines 2497:Alastair Haines 2416: 2364:WP:NOTINHERITED 2325: 2300: 2259: 2252: 2225:page protection 2175:page protection 2135: 2006:Manual of Style 1920: 1771: 1769:Manual of Style 1749:from editing. 1706: 1613: 1541:Discuss it. -- 1486: 1383: 1358:Critical Survey 1351: 1313: 1189:entry. Thanks. 1167: 1136: 1089: 1053: 1030: 1002: 997: 982: 977: 973: 949: 934: 890: 846: 802: 797: 723: 652:Manual of Style 608: 558: 488: 462: 431: 369: 352: 311: 273: 258: 201: 173: 169: 165: 161: 108: 77: 33: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5171: 5169: 5144: 5139: 5138: 5137: 5107: 5102: 5091:LarkinToad2010 5085: 5082: 5045: 5042: 5018: 5015: 5006: 4993: 4992: 4991: 4960: 4957: 4956: 4955: 4926: 4925: 4922: 4918: 4915: 4912: 4904: 4901: 4900: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4880: 4879: 4815: 4812: 4789: 4786: 4765: 4764: 4751: 4735: 4732: 4731: 4726: 4724: 4710: 4707: 4706: 4705: 4672: 4669: 4668: 4667: 4666: 4665: 4664: 4663: 4575: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4551: 4550: 4516: 4511: 4510: 4509: 4508: 4507: 4459: 4456: 4439: 4436: 4416: 4413: 4387:BLP violations 4341: 4338: 4317: 4314: 4293: 4290: 4263:something else 4204: 4201: 4182: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4142: 4139: 4138: 4137: 4110: 4106: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4062: 4059: 4044:TR BioSurgical 4039: 4038:Speedy decline 4036: 4035: 4034: 3928: 3925: 3881: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3837: 3834: 3814: 3809: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3765: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3721: 3716: 3694: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3660: 3659: 3656: 3653: 3640: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3616: 3615: 3564: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3540: 3539: 3481: 3478: 3462: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3408: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3378: 3377: 3347: 3346: 3312: 3309: 3300: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3283:Another one :) 3271: 3258: 3256: 3253: 3244: 3231: 3229: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3138: 3134: 3123: 3119: 3118: 3073: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 2935: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2904: 2903: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2864: 2860: 2825: 2824: 2816: 2808: 2803: 2771: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2735: 2732: 2729: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2690: 2679: 2678: 2655: 2654: 2605: 2604: 2556: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2508: 2507: 2494: 2491: 2488: 2485: 2415: 2411:nomination of 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2380: 2379: 2324: 2321: 2299: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2263:open frequency 2251: 2248: 2186: 2134: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2069: 2063: 2062: 2061:did. Accepted. 2052: 2046: 2045: 2029: 2028: 1962: 1961: 1919: 1914: 1899: 1898: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1838: 1837: 1802: 1801: 1770: 1767: 1745:, you will be 1734: 1733: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1683: 1682: 1661: 1660: 1612: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1569: 1568: 1538: 1537: 1508: 1507: 1502: 1497: 1492: 1485: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1452: 1451: 1434: 1433: 1416: 1415: 1382: 1377: 1350: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1312: 1311:Science Vision 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1252: 1251: 1221: 1220: 1166: 1161: 1135: 1132: 1088: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1058:comment added 1029: 1026: 1025: 1024: 991:PS Looks like 972: 970:Kurt Krakowian 967: 933: 930: 929: 928: 886: 885: 841: 840: 796: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 755: 754: 722: 719: 718: 717: 679: 678: 607: 604: 603: 602: 557: 554: 487: 483:nomination of 478: 461: 458: 430: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 406: 405: 368: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 348: 336: 335: 307: 299: 298: 269: 257: 252: 251: 250: 249: 248: 231: 230: 200: 197: 196: 195: 160: 157: 156: 155: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 55: 54: 37: 26: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5170: 5161: 5159: 5155: 5151: 5143: 5140: 5136: 5132: 5128: 5127:Guillaume2303 5124: 5123: 5122: 5121: 5117: 5113: 5106: 5103: 5101: 5100: 5096: 5092: 5083: 5081: 5080: 5075: 5070: 5066: 5065:raison d'etre 5061: 5058: 5055: 5052: 5049: 5043: 5041: 5040: 5036: 5032: 5029:? Thank you. 5028: 5024: 5016: 5011: 5004: 4997: 4990: 4986: 4982: 4981:Guillaume2303 4978: 4977: 4976: 4975: 4971: 4967: 4958: 4954: 4950: 4946: 4945:Guillaume2303 4942: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4935: 4931: 4923: 4919: 4916: 4913: 4910: 4909: 4908: 4902: 4896: 4892: 4888: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4881: 4878: 4874: 4870: 4869:Guillaume2303 4866: 4862: 4859: 4858: 4857: 4856: 4852: 4848: 4843: 4841: 4840:on page three 4838: 4833: 4829: 4828: 4823: 4822: 4813: 4811: 4810: 4806: 4801: 4800: 4794: 4787: 4785: 4784: 4780: 4776: 4772: 4763: 4761: 4757: 4756:subst:Cookies 4752: 4747: 4743: 4739: 4734: 4733: 4730: 4727: 4722: 4717: 4714: 4708: 4704: 4700: 4696: 4695:Guillaume2303 4691: 4690: 4689: 4688: 4683: 4678: 4670: 4662: 4657: 4652: 4648: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4637: 4632: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4620: 4615: 4610: 4609: 4608: 4607: 4602: 4597: 4593: 4589: 4588: 4583: 4582: 4573: 4567: 4563: 4559: 4555: 4554: 4553: 4552: 4549: 4545: 4541: 4540:Guillaume2303 4537: 4533: 4532: 4531: 4530: 4526: 4522: 4515: 4512: 4506: 4502: 4498: 4494: 4493: 4492: 4488: 4484: 4483:Guillaume2303 4480: 4479: 4478: 4477: 4473: 4469: 4465: 4457: 4455: 4454: 4450: 4446: 4437: 4435: 4434: 4430: 4426: 4420: 4414: 4412: 4411: 4407: 4403: 4398: 4396: 4392: 4388: 4384: 4379: 4377: 4373: 4369: 4368:autoconfirmed 4364: 4362: 4358: 4346: 4339: 4337: 4336: 4332: 4328: 4327:Chelschamplin 4323: 4315: 4313: 4312: 4308: 4304: 4303: 4298: 4291: 4289: 4287: 4283: 4279: 4274: 4273: 4269: 4264: 4260: 4256: 4252: 4248: 4243: 4242: 4237: 4233: 4228: 4224: 4219: 4218: 4214: 4210: 4202: 4200: 4199: 4194: 4190: 4180: 4176: 4172: 4168: 4167:Guillaume2303 4164: 4159: 4155: 4154: 4153: 4150: 4146: 4140: 4136: 4132: 4128: 4127:Guillaume2303 4124: 4123: 4122: 4121: 4117: 4113: 4104: 4100: 4096: 4092: 4091:Guillaume2303 4087: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4080: 4076: 4072: 4068: 4060: 4058: 4057: 4053: 4049: 4045: 4037: 4033: 4029: 4025: 4024:Guillaume2303 4020: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4005: 4001: 3997: 3996:Guillaume2303 3993: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3980:188.23.99.141 3977: 3973: 3972:Guillaume2303 3969: 3965: 3961: 3956: 3952: 3945: 3941: 3940:188.23.99.141 3937: 3926: 3924: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3911: 3906: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3892: 3888: 3885: 3879: 3875: 3871: 3867: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3855: 3851: 3847: 3843: 3835: 3833: 3832: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3813: 3810: 3802: 3798: 3794: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3779: 3775: 3770: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3750:Guillaume2303 3747: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3728: 3720: 3717: 3715: 3714: 3710: 3704: 3700: 3692: 3688: 3684: 3680: 3679:Guillaume2303 3676: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3669: 3665: 3657: 3654: 3651: 3650:0-306-30915-7 3648: 3643: 3642: 3638: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3614: 3610: 3606: 3605:Guillaume2303 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3594: 3590: 3583: 3577:redirects to 3573: 3562: 3556: 3552: 3548: 3547:Guillaume2303 3544: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3529:Guillaume2303 3526: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3502: 3498: 3493: 3489: 3485: 3479: 3477: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3461: 3458: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3419: 3415: 3406: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3367:Guillaume2303 3364: 3363: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3349: 3348: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3336:Guillaume2303 3333: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3310: 3305: 3298: 3291: 3284: 3281: 3280: 3276: 3269: 3262: 3255:Global Policy 3254: 3249: 3242: 3235: 3227: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3207: 3205: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3164:Guillaume2303 3161: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3139: 3136: 3135: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3121: 3120: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3108:Guillaume2303 3104: 3103: 3102: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3087:Gil-Sung Park 3083: 3079: 3071: 3063: 3059: 3055: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3041: 3037: 3033: 3032:Guillaume2303 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3012:Guillaume2303 3009: 3004: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2990: 2986: 2981: 2979: 2973: 2971: 2969: 2963: 2961: 2954: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2934: 2931: 2923: 2919: 2913: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2893:Guillaume2303 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2881: 2875: 2865: 2861: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2847:Guillaume2303 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2836: 2830: 2821: 2817: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2807: 2804: 2802: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2783: 2780: 2777: 2769: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2752:Guillaume2303 2749: 2748: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2736: 2733: 2730: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2703: 2697: 2696: 2694: 2691: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2656: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2644:Guillaume2303 2641: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2602: 2600: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2591: 2590:Song of Songs 2586: 2582: 2577: 2574: 2570: 2564: 2560: 2555: 2552: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2516:Guillaume2303 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2495: 2492: 2489: 2486: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2458: 2453: 2451: 2447: 2442: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2420: 2414: 2410: 2407: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2392:Guillaume2303 2389: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2369:Guillaume2303 2365: 2360: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2328: 2322: 2320: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2310: 2305: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2284:Guillaume2303 2280: 2275: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2264: 2258: 2249: 2247: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2232: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2196: 2190: 2184: 2182: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2146: 2140: 2133: 2130: 2115: 2111: 2110:SarekOfVulcan 2107: 2106: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2092:Guillaume2303 2089: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2070: 2067: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2053: 2050: 2047: 2043: 2040: 2036: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2018:Guillaume2303 2015: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1924: 1918: 1915: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1888:Guillaume2303 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1868: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1849:Guillaume2303 1846: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1827:Guillaume2303 1824: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1791:Guillaume2303 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1768: 1766: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1748: 1744: 1739: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1707: 1703: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1688:Gun Powder Ma 1685: 1684: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1672:Guillaume2303 1669: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1650:Guillaume2303 1647: 1642: 1638: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1621:Gun Powder Ma 1618: 1610: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1593:Guillaume2303 1589: 1588: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1570: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1558:Guillaume2303 1554: 1553: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1539: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1527:Guillaume2303 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1506: 1503: 1501: 1498: 1496: 1493: 1491: 1488: 1487: 1483: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1460: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1423:Guillaume2303 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1387: 1381: 1378: 1376: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1354: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1335:Guillaume2303 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1319: 1310: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1295:Guillaume2303 1291: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1260: 1256: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1241:Guillaume2303 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1210:Guillaume2303 1207: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1165: 1162: 1160: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1148:Thank you! -- 1146: 1143: 1141: 1133: 1131: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1117: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1098: 1096: 1095: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1073:Guillaume2303 1070: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1061: 1057: 1052: 1049:Best regards 1047: 1044: 1041:is provided. 1040: 1035: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1014:Guillaume2303 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1005: 1000: 994: 993:User:Eastmain 989: 988: 985: 980: 971: 968: 966: 965: 960: 956: 952: 947: 943: 939: 931: 927: 923: 919: 918:Guillaume2303 915: 914: 913: 910: 906: 902: 898: 894: 884: 880: 876: 875:Guillaume2303 871: 870: 869: 866: 862: 858: 854: 850: 839: 835: 831: 830:Guillaume2303 827: 826: 825: 822: 818: 814: 810: 806: 794: 788: 784: 780: 779:Guillaume2303 776: 772: 771: 770: 766: 762: 757: 756: 753: 749: 745: 744:Guillaume2303 740: 739: 738: 737: 733: 729: 721:InsektenBorse 720: 716: 712: 708: 707:Guillaume2303 704: 703: 702: 701: 697: 693: 688: 684: 677: 673: 669: 668:Guillaume2303 665: 664:WP:OTHERSTUFF 661: 657: 653: 649: 645: 644: 643: 642: 638: 634: 629: 625: 621: 617: 613: 605: 601: 597: 593: 589: 586: 585: 584: 583: 579: 575: 569: 567: 563: 555: 553: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 530: 525: 523: 519: 514: 512: 508: 504: 500: 492: 486: 482: 479: 477: 476: 472: 468: 459: 457: 456: 452: 448: 444: 440: 436: 428: 422: 418: 414: 410: 409: 408: 407: 404: 400: 396: 395:Guillaume2303 392: 391: 390: 389: 385: 381: 376: 374: 366: 360: 356: 351: 346: 342: 338: 337: 334: 330: 326: 325:Guillaume2303 321: 320: 319: 315: 310: 305: 301: 300: 297: 293: 289: 288:Guillaume2303 284: 283: 282: 281: 277: 272: 267: 263: 256: 253: 247: 243: 239: 235: 234: 233: 232: 229: 225: 221: 220:Guillaume2303 217: 216: 215: 214: 210: 206: 198: 194: 190: 186: 185:Guillaume2303 182: 181: 180: 179: 176: 168: 158: 154: 150: 146: 145:Guillaume2303 142: 141: 140: 139:Joseph Damen 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 64: 61: 60: 52: 48: 44: 43: 38: 31: 30: 27: 19: 5146: 5109: 5087: 5064: 5062: 5059: 5056: 5053: 5050: 5047: 5020: 4962: 4927: 4906: 4844: 4839: 4831: 4825: 4819: 4817: 4798: 4791: 4768: 4753: 4750: 4728: 4712: 4674: 4585: 4579: 4577: 4518: 4461: 4441: 4421: 4418: 4399: 4380: 4365: 4350: 4319: 4300: 4295: 4275: 4244: 4220: 4206: 4184: 4151: 4147: 4144: 4112:Čikić Dragan 4108: 4070: 4064: 4041: 3967: 3930: 3907: 3893: 3889: 3886: 3883: 3846:verification 3839: 3816: 3811: 3771: 3767: 3723: 3696: 3661: 3582:Italic title 3566: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3483: 3464: 3410: 3314: 3282: 3215:inconclusive 3214: 3210: 3141: 3130: 3126: 3075: 3002: 2982: 2977: 2974: 2967: 2965: 2959: 2957: 2955: 2939: 2937: 2871: 2826: 2810: 2786: 2773: 2700: 2663: 2659: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2597: 2578: 2572: 2565: 2561: 2558: 2553: 2463:Please note: 2462: 2461: 2454: 2443: 2424: 2335: 2331: 2329: 2326: 2307: 2301: 2274:olive branch 2253: 2233:from editing 2228: 2193: 2183:from editing 2178: 2143: 2136: 2132:Notification 2083: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2065: 2054: 2048: 2041: 2034: 2013: 2009: 2001: 1927: 1925: 1921: 1900: 1869: 1865: 1803: 1772: 1735: 1614: 1573: 1509: 1458: 1384: 1355: 1352: 1316: 1314: 1289: 1267: 1263: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1222: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1168: 1163: 1147: 1144: 1137: 1118: 1102: 1099: 1092: 1090: 1048: 1031: 990: 974: 935: 887: 842: 798: 724: 680: 609: 570: 559: 535:Please note: 534: 533: 526: 515: 496: 463: 432: 377: 372: 370: 261: 259: 202: 162: 109: 78: 46: 40: 25: 4966:Steve Quinn 4930:Steve Quinn 4887:Steve Quinn 4847:Steve Quinn 4760:subst:munch 4425:Steve Quinn 3934:—Preceding 3572:Italictitle 2638:Let me ask 2229:you may be 2179:you may be 1968:content. -- 1054:—Preceding 891:—Preceding 847:—Preceding 803:—Preceding 692:JosephDamen 633:JosephDamen 413:Languagehat 380:Languagehat 129:JosephDamen 39:This is an 4445:Epeefleche 4402:Courcelles 4247:Wikisource 4209:Off2riorob 4203:Retirement 3764:Phil Trans 3725:category: 3412:project.-- 3389:Off2riorob 3353:Off2riorob 3317:Off2riorob 2664:Adamantius 2573:Adamantius 2559:Dear Wim, 2554:Adamantius 2471:Erwin85Bot 2250:SerdechnyG 2237:SerdechnyG 2096:SerdechnyG 2014:encouraged 1987:SerdechnyG 1951:SerdechnyG 1936:SerdechnyG 1871:attention. 1756:SerdechnyG 1723:SerdechnyG 1711:User:EEMIV 1578:SerdechnyG 1543:SerdechnyG 1512:SerdechnyG 543:Erwin85Bot 355:WP Physics 314:WP Physics 276:WP Physics 98:Archive 10 5031:Tom Reedy 4458:Thanks... 4383:vandalism 4227:phenotype 4181:A request 4158:Phenotype 4008:Leontari1 3988:Leontari1 3823:Brangifer 3708:come howl 3699:this edit 3697:You made 3567:Actually 3008:synthesis 2917:come howl 2879:come howl 2834:come howl 2217:consensus 2167:consensus 2084:everybody 2039:you wrote 1932:vandalism 1843:See also 1804:--Thanks. 1719:good will 1715:vandalism 1366:BenJonson 1150:Jon Zhang 1121:BenJonson 1107:BenJonson 1003:cierekim 983:cierekim 437:from the 90:Archive 6 85:Archive 5 79:Archive 4 73:Archive 3 68:Archive 2 63:Archive 1 5084:Crowther 5008:You can 4771:Mcmatter 4746:WikiLove 4729:Cookies! 4709:Retired? 4353:reviewer 4249:! (e.g. 3936:unsigned 3525:User:DGG 3311:Sambrook 3302:You can 3273:You can 3246:You can 3213:only an 3143:therein. 3129:in the 2970:idskrift 2962:idskrift 2872:Cheers, 2427:deletion 2257:RadManCF 2195:edit war 2145:edit war 1821:I think 1668:User:DGG 1484:Check it 959:contribs 951:Eastmain 905:contribs 893:unsigned 861:contribs 849:unsigned 817:contribs 805:unsigned 560:I think 499:deletion 460:Journals 350:κοντριβς 345:Headbomb 309:κοντριβς 304:Headbomb 271:κοντριβς 266:Headbomb 238:Looie496 205:Looie496 5150:Msrasnw 4788:Retired 4779:contrib 4742:cookies 4278:Msrasnw 4232:Nuujinn 4223:phoneme 4189:Nuujinn 3772:Thanks 3623:ukexpat 3589:ukexpat 3467:ukexpat 3443:Grahame 3429:Grahame 3414:Grahame 3196:Msrasnw 3147:Msrasnw 3091:Msrasnw 3054:Hegvald 2985:Hegvald 2944:Hegvald 2827:Cheers. 2588:on the 2344:Gleaman 2298:merging 2231:blocked 2181:blocked 1774:Thanks. 1747:blocked 1704:Warning 1386:Thanks! 1056:undated 897:Forgang 853:Forgang 809:Forgang 775:Anubias 761:Notafly 728:Notafly 658:." The 467:Lyonski 174:Windows 42:archive 5112:Tkuvho 4979::-) -- 4864:moment 4584:& 4497:Drmies 4468:Drmies 4438:direct 3914:Edstat 3896:Edstat 3866:Bejnar 3850:Bejnar 3664:Bejnar 3639:BIOSIS 2964:, not 2660:admire 2585:Origen 2359:WP:NOT 2080:people 2002:always 1903:Iss246 1873:Iss246 1806:Iss246 1776:Iss246 1464:Drmies 1441:Drmies 1405:Drmies 1389:Drmies 1272:Iss246 1225:Iss246 1191:Iss246 588:Uh oh! 447:Beagel 166:Fences 4793:As if 4671:IJSEM 4307:talk 3964:WP:RS 3819:here. 2818:I've 2707:talk 2640:DGG's 2437:and " 2314:talk 2088:EEMIV 2059:EEMIV 1970:EEMIV 1934:. -- 1574:there 1323:talk 1140:NAJMS 1043:CEEOL 1039:CEEOL 940:and 687:WP:EL 683:WP:EL 648:WP:EL 592:Hoary 574:Hoary 509:and " 341:WP:OR 170:& 16:< 5154:talk 5131:talk 5116:talk 5095:talk 5089:can. 5074:talk 5035:talk 4985:talk 4970:talk 4949:talk 4934:talk 4891:talk 4873:talk 4851:talk 4775:talk 4762:}}! 4738:BCMJ 4699:talk 4682:talk 4656:talk 4636:talk 4619:talk 4601:talk 4562:talk 4544:talk 4525:talk 4501:talk 4487:talk 4472:talk 4449:talk 4429:talk 4423:---- 4406:talk 4395:here 4331:talk 4282:talk 4236:talk 4225:and 4213:talk 4193:talk 4171:talk 4131:talk 4116:talk 4095:talk 4079:talk 4052:talk 4028:talk 4012:talk 4000:talk 3992:talk 3984:talk 3976:talk 3962:and 3960:WP:V 3951:WP:N 3944:talk 3918:talk 3900:talk 3870:talk 3854:talk 3848:. -- 3827:talk 3797:talk 3778:talk 3754:talk 3739:talk 3683:talk 3668:talk 3647:ISBN 3627:talk 3609:talk 3593:talk 3551:talk 3533:talk 3501:talk 3471:talk 3447:talk 3433:talk 3418:talk 3393:talk 3371:talk 3357:talk 3340:talk 3321:talk 3211:keep 3200:talk 3190:and 3168:talk 3151:talk 3133:here 3112:talk 3095:talk 3058:talk 3036:talk 3016:talk 2989:talk 2948:talk 2897:talk 2851:talk 2796:talk 2756:talk 2742:talk 2728:can. 2672:talk 2648:talk 2629:talk 2581:ATLA 2569:copy 2541:talk 2520:talk 2501:talk 2475:talk 2441:"). 2396:talk 2390:. -- 2373:talk 2348:talk 2288:talk 2279:this 2241:talk 2114:talk 2100:talk 2090:and 2082:and 2022:talk 1991:talk 1974:talk 1955:talk 1940:talk 1928:full 1907:talk 1892:talk 1877:talk 1853:talk 1847:. -- 1845:here 1831:talk 1823:this 1810:talk 1795:talk 1780:talk 1760:talk 1727:talk 1692:talk 1676:talk 1654:talk 1625:talk 1597:talk 1582:talk 1562:talk 1547:talk 1531:talk 1516:talk 1468:talk 1445:talk 1427:talk 1409:talk 1393:talk 1370:talk 1339:talk 1299:talk 1276:talk 1268:JHSB 1264:JHSB 1255:JHSB 1245:talk 1229:talk 1214:talk 1195:talk 1187:JHSB 1183:JHSB 1171:JHSB 1154:talk 1125:talk 1111:talk 1077:talk 1018:talk 998:Dloh 978:Dloh 955:talk 922:talk 901:talk 879:talk 857:talk 834:talk 813:talk 783:talk 765:talk 748:talk 732:talk 711:talk 696:talk 672:talk 637:talk 626:and 622:and 618:and 596:talk 578:talk 566:here 547:talk 513:"). 471:talk 451:talk 417:talk 399:talk 384:talk 373:Niva 329:talk 292:talk 242:talk 224:talk 209:talk 189:talk 149:talk 133:talk 123:and 119:and 115:and 5025:at 4921:] ) 4804:Mar 4799:Res 4385:or 4302:DGG 4048:Kww 3968:any 3821:-- 3194:. ( 3003:did 2940:how 2702:DGG 2467:bot 2409:AfD 2338:at 2309:DGG 2235:. 2076:yet 2010:not 1459:not 1364:.-- 1318:DGG 1175:not 590:-- 539:bot 481:AfD 5156:) 5133:) 5118:) 5097:) 5037:) 4987:) 4972:) 4951:) 4936:) 4893:) 4875:) 4853:) 4781:) 4769:- 4701:) 4564:) 4558:TB 4546:) 4527:) 4521:TB 4503:) 4489:) 4474:) 4451:) 4431:) 4408:) 4397:. 4378:. 4333:) 4309:) 4288:) 4284:) 4257:, 4253:, 4215:) 4173:) 4133:) 4118:) 4097:) 4089:-- 4081:) 4054:) 4030:) 4014:) 3920:) 3902:) 3872:) 3856:) 3829:) 3799:) 3780:) 3756:) 3741:) 3729:, 3685:) 3670:) 3629:) 3611:) 3603:-- 3595:) 3585:}} 3579:{{ 3575:}} 3569:{{ 3553:) 3535:) 3503:) 3473:) 3449:) 3435:) 3420:) 3395:) 3373:) 3359:) 3342:) 3323:) 3206:) 3202:) 3170:) 3157:) 3153:) 3114:) 3097:) 3080:, 3060:) 3038:) 3018:) 2991:) 2950:) 2899:) 2853:) 2798:) 2758:) 2744:) 2709:) 2674:) 2650:) 2631:) 2543:) 2522:) 2503:) 2477:) 2398:) 2375:) 2350:) 2316:) 2290:) 2243:) 2185:. 2102:) 2024:) 1993:) 1976:) 1957:) 1942:) 1909:) 1894:) 1879:) 1855:) 1833:) 1812:) 1797:) 1782:) 1762:) 1729:) 1694:) 1678:) 1656:) 1627:) 1599:) 1591:-- 1584:) 1564:) 1549:) 1533:) 1518:) 1470:) 1447:) 1429:) 1411:) 1395:) 1372:) 1341:) 1333:-- 1325:) 1301:) 1278:) 1247:) 1231:) 1216:) 1197:) 1156:) 1127:) 1113:) 1079:) 1020:) 957:• 924:) 907:) 903:• 881:) 863:) 859:• 836:) 819:) 815:• 785:) 767:) 750:) 734:) 713:) 698:) 674:) 639:) 598:) 580:) 568:. 549:) 473:) 453:) 445:. 419:) 401:) 386:) 357:} 353:– 331:) 323:-- 316:} 312:– 294:) 278:} 274:– 244:) 226:) 211:) 191:) 151:) 135:) 94:→ 5152:( 5129:( 5114:( 5093:( 5076:) 5072:( 5033:( 5005:. 4983:( 4968:( 4947:( 4932:( 4889:( 4871:( 4849:( 4777:| 4773:( 4697:( 4684:) 4680:( 4658:) 4654:( 4638:) 4634:( 4621:) 4617:( 4603:) 4599:( 4560:( 4542:( 4523:( 4499:( 4485:( 4470:( 4447:( 4427:( 4404:( 4329:( 4305:( 4280:( 4238:) 4234:( 4211:( 4195:) 4191:( 4169:( 4129:( 4114:( 4093:( 4077:( 4050:( 4026:( 4010:( 3998:( 3990:( 3982:( 3974:( 3942:( 3916:( 3898:( 3868:( 3852:( 3825:( 3795:( 3776:( 3752:( 3737:( 3681:( 3666:( 3625:( 3607:( 3591:( 3549:( 3531:( 3499:( 3469:( 3445:( 3431:( 3416:( 3391:( 3369:( 3355:( 3338:( 3319:( 3299:. 3270:. 3243:. 3198:( 3166:( 3149:( 3137:] 3110:( 3093:( 3056:( 3034:( 3014:( 2987:( 2968:T 2960:t 2946:( 2895:( 2849:( 2794:( 2754:( 2740:( 2705:( 2670:( 2646:( 2627:( 2539:( 2518:( 2499:( 2473:( 2394:( 2371:( 2346:( 2312:( 2286:( 2260:☢ 2239:( 2116:) 2112:( 2098:( 2020:( 1989:( 1972:( 1953:( 1938:( 1905:( 1890:( 1875:( 1851:( 1829:( 1808:( 1793:( 1778:( 1758:( 1725:( 1690:( 1674:( 1652:( 1623:( 1595:( 1580:( 1560:( 1545:( 1529:( 1514:( 1466:( 1443:( 1425:( 1407:( 1391:( 1368:( 1337:( 1321:( 1297:( 1274:( 1243:( 1227:( 1212:( 1193:( 1152:( 1123:( 1109:( 1075:( 1062:. 1016:( 961:) 953:( 920:( 899:( 877:( 855:( 832:( 811:( 781:( 763:( 746:( 730:( 709:( 694:( 670:( 635:( 594:( 576:( 545:( 469:( 449:( 415:( 397:( 382:( 347:{ 327:( 306:{ 290:( 268:{ 240:( 222:( 207:( 187:( 147:( 131:( 53:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.