User talk:Guillaume2303/Archive 5

559:. The article is badly written and contains unencyclopedic and unnecessary content. Just one example is the mention that "She is also on the Scientists Panel at Index Copernicus". This is a database where one can enter oneself, with as far as I know no curating at all. This is absolutely trivial. There is much more like this in the article. In short, the whole article seems to be written to tell us what a wonderful person this is ("fansite") instead of informing us matter of factly what is important and interesting to know about this person. The references are a mess, etc, etc. I have no time to work on this (it would take many hours to clean this up), so the next best thing is putting those tags and hoping someone will come along who can remedy these problems. Perhaps you? -- 1861:

results as (I think) your second search. Whatever is correct, that's a huge amount either way. What worries me more is that I recently searched for a journal, got a number of hits, but when I then clicked on one of the library links, that library's catalog did not contain the journal in question at all... Seems like WorldCat is not infallible. That the references are behind a pay barrier is inconvenient, because then it is difficult to check them (haven't tried yet whether I have access from the lab here), but it does not preclude them from being cited. After all, paper sources that are not online are acceptable sources, too. And in the present case, their titles were clear enough to show what they were about. Best wishes, --

3233:. I see no reason not to believe what you are saying. However, the website of this journal says: "The Bulletin of Marine Science (print ISSN 0007-4977, online ISSN 1553-6955) is published four times per year in one volume for the Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science of the University of Miami by AllenPress, Inc., 810 East 10th Street, Lawrence, Kansas 66044-0368 U.S.A.", so this is what the article should say. If you're really connected with the journal, have them change their website, let me know about it, and I will make the requested change as necessary. For the moment, however, I will revert the article back to reflect what the journal's own website says. Thanks. -- 508:'This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. It resembles a fan site. Tagged since August 2010. Its neutrality is disputed. Tagged since August 2010. It may need copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone or spelling. Tagged since August 2010. It may need to be wikified to meet Knowledge (XXG)'s quality standards. Tagged since August 2010. It may require general cleanup to meet Knowledge (XXG)'s quality standards. Tagged since August 2010. It may contain improper references to self-published sources. Tagged since August 2010.' 591:

care towards her students, collaboration in research, and dedication to the welfare of the institution she heads.' But, according to me, this sums her up as a person because of the influences upon her by people of that type she has been associated with, and her own abilities to adhere to such qualities. One sentence in a biography which sums up a person humanises him/her, and should add to the joy of reading about him/her. Hope you agree. But kindly guide with an example what you consider fan-site type writeup, so I could remedy it.

2320:... I noticed that the article you mentioned does not comply with WP:MOS (already in the lead by wikilinking part of the bolded journal name, but there is more: all the bolded subsections don't seem to comply with MOS, either). An infobox would be nice, too. And since this is continued seamlessly by Doklady Akademii Nauk, I wonder whether this should not be renamed to that title with the other title mentioned as a former name for the same journal. Hope this helps! -- 4043:

been kept because it was argued that any journal published by this reputable publisher was notable. The same probably goes for APA. In addition, even though PsycInfo is APA published, it is independent and a somewhat discriminative database that does not accept just any journal. So in all, an article should be doable and I agree that given its ancestry, the journal will very likely become more notable very soon. (Even though that argument goes against

4860:{{non-free magazine cover}} template allowing "fair use", there should be no problem. However, some non-US jurisdictions (France, for example), do not allow fair use and in consequence, cover files cannot be uploaded on Commons. Having said all this, if you are working for the publisher of this journal, you should be very careful when editing this article or (even better) completely refrain from doing so. Please see Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on 34: 858:

journals cats should not contain any articles at all, just subcats, but we're far removed from that...) Note however that even if something may have a medical application, we don't necessarily class it as a medical journal. All Neuroscience journals publish articles on Alzheimer and such, but because they are not clinically oriented, we don't categorize them as medical journals (of course, neurological journals is a different matter). --

5331: 4072: 3663: 5293: 5017:

links from the honors college are still up, it is still listed as an active organization, the staff list is only one year old (2009-2010). As you correctly observed, it publishes infrequently, sometimes with a year or more between issues dependent on whether they have sufficient submissions to publish, so contacting them to determine the status of the journal is not "self-contradictory".

2972:. There is some promotional text there, which mostly seems to have been added by an involved/COI editor a couple of years ago, but I don't think it's unsalvageable. It is a major professional journal for nurses in the UK, so I think it's reasonable to have an article on it; I'll have a look to try and tone down some of the language, and perhaps even find a source or two, if I'm lucky :) -- 3017: 720:

on her publications can still be improved, too. In general it is better not to describe the publications, but to describe the research that a person has done and then use their publications as a reference for that. You can then at the end include a section in which you list the 3-5 most important articles. To help you format references, you can perhaps use these handy tools:

3343: 5021:

an organization that is the topic of the article as long as it is not POV. There is no reason to remove it in this instance. The other reference from The Pittsburgh Press article is a independent source for the information that journal was "the only juried undergraduate academic journal in the country" in 1984, and it was inappropriate for it to be removed.

3954:. Quick Q, mostly out of curiosity: I noticed you deleted the psychology and theology templates (collapsable versions, displaying at bottom of page). Were there particular guidelines that suggested the article would be better without them? (i.e., what was your reasoning?) I ask mostly out of curiosity for the next time I put up a bio for someone... Thanks 3630:

thing I found was a 1909 or 1910 German-language journal which supposedly contains Insekten-Börse as a suplement (1909 or 1910). It is on a web site that produces copies of books that are now in the public domain (can't think of the name). Still this is not much to go on. I reccomend that Notafly search libraries for the physical print versions. ----

1964: 3529:

history. I will have to do another article move for this, or actually just merge this contents into a new article. Anyway, by usiing the most current title it is possible to access much more information about the journal, in its contemporary form. At least it will be a decent article. I also left this comment on the talk page. ----

1428:

economic analysis. Grounded in economics, is explicitly interdisciplinary. It encourages exchange and dialogue extending across a range of social sciences, including law, philosophy, political science and sociology. The journal publishes theoretical and empirical research, as well as contributions to constitutional policy issues..

2679:(or one of its subguides) and have an article on them. The article's talk page then get a template {{notabvle wikipedian|username}} and that automatically ads that page to this category. I wasn't sure why it was on your page, but didn't want to do a big edit because I think that's impolite, so I just inserted the colon. -- 2416:(in many languages), that are categorized as "magazine", alongside computer magazines and other modern stuff. The nature of a category by language is that many different things will be thrown together, just because they happen to be published in the same language. So I don't see this as much of a problem. Happy editing! -- 2451: 711:

me), what is being meant. One example is "She is also a recognised Ph.D. Guide", but there are a few more. Perhaps you can go through it again and try to clarify such statements. Another point is that you still use words like "renowned" (not necessarily for her). It is more encyclopedic to leave out such "

2111:. I still didn't get them all. This user is calling other editors vandals throughout the thread, among other uncalled for comments. In conclusion - are the three of us willing to go to ANI to deal with thiis matter? I know I am. There is no need to make excuses for this person's disruptive behavior.---- 5024:

You may be correct that it has ceased operation, or per their typically rolling publication schedule, they may be in between cycles. When I verify the status, I will revert your edits as appropriate if it is in fact the case that it has ceased operation, and I will let you know the status here. I am

5020:

Regarding the replaced references, particularly Peterson's, there is no requirement that the sourcing of information needs to be independent. That is a criteria for establishing notability, not having well-sourced information throughout the article, and this information can, and often does, come from

710:

Hi, It's getting better, you're learning WP! :-) There are still some issues. The English is here and there non-standard. I realize that Indian English has some uses that are different and that is generally not a problem, but sometimes it makes it difficult to understand for non-native speakers (like

647:

as examples of somewhat less famous scientists (the latter three articles are not perfect, but have no obvious faults). Writing an encyclopedic biography is not easy and Knowledge (XXG) has some stringent rules and guidelines for it. Familiarizing yourself with those will save you a lot of time. Hope

517:

2. All matter put in is suitably attributed by proper references which can be checked through links put up . If any links not needed, or to be added, kindly guide. If all links read, it would give a clear idea what the subject of the article has done to merit inclusion in Knowledge (XXG). Kindly find

178:

with vol. 30. When journals change names, they get a new OCLC, probably also another LCCN, and often (always?) a new ISSN. Sometimes they even re-start numbering volumes. But if one journal is a clear successor to another, I prefer to treat them in one article. Journal articles are often brief enough

4543:

A department head at Cambridge is unlikely not to be notable. The trick with most academics, as you note, is to find sources. Unlike sportsmen and actors, academics are rarely the subject of newspaper reports or interviews... But his departmental page could be a good starting point and is acceptable

3591:

OK somehow I didn't see your opinion (selective reading?). However, you may have missed something. I wrote that there seems to be less information available about the contemporary title than this title. Hence, we have quite a quandry. With no material, there can be no article. Just food for thought,

3454:

judgement, it just means that the journal has not (yet) made an impact. Very few journals become notable within their first 3-4 years. The best way of action would be to have the article deleted and re-create it when the time is ripe. You can have it deleted either by letting the PROD run its course

2777:

I appreciate all the work you have done and realize that it has taken a lot of time. Unfortunately, I still think that it is not good enough yet. All you did in your last edits was just change the wording slightly, so that now it seems you don't describe individual articles but the work. That is not

2315:

Hi, normally I would address this kind of problems myself (if it is something I am able to do, which is the case here), but I am too busy with real life work and with re-categorizing all articles in the top journal categories (Academic journals, Medical journals, etc) and disambiguating all links to

1503:

ad 3/ Well, the "??" indicated that I had no clue what this meant and I expect it will be the same for others. I actually thought that this had been inadvertently copied from the journal's website. I would think that people with poor vision know how to handle this (and probably already have a larger

719:

sources for that. Also, praise like the last sentence of "Influences" is very unusual in WP bios. Generally, showing people's accomplishments will speak for itself, but if you really want to include such a statement, you'll have (again...) to produce a reliable independent source for it. The section

586:

2. Could you please guide what referencing system you recommend so it could be suitable modified? I purposely used what I did so it redirects to links where the reader could know further about the person, and also verify the sources for himself. My understanding is a biography in Knowledge (XXG) is

5040:

I have now re-read that newspaper article and I stand corrected: it does indeed mention PUR in the way you say. Given the way they describe it ("juried"), I don't have much confidence that it is accurate and even if it is, it doesn't establish notability. Nevertheless, it's an appropriate reference

4414:

OK. I see what you are saying. Apparently this type of thing is new to me. I guess I will have to review your comments, and ultimately change it back to its "journal" status. I don't have a problem with that. Perhaps, I acted in haste on this one. When compared to a publication like "The Scientist"

2798:

I get what you say. Will work over it. Should be rather easy; this was difficult. But working over it from what we have won't be difficult, though my personal opinion is this is more comprehensive and gives a real flavour of what the person is all about - as far as what she has written goes. But if

2674:

That I frankly don't know. You'd have to go through your edit history to find out how it got there, or use wikiblame (I think that's its name). It was on your page in the exact same position as it is now, so it added you to this category. The category is not for editors who have gotten barnstars or

590:

3. I am sure I would not want to be associated with a 'fan-site' type writeup, so will try and clean up any unnecessary adulatory sentences. There is only one sentence which appears such to me: ' These influences have helped forge the qualities she is known for - integrity in administation, special

5016:

Hi Guillaume2303, your edits about the journal's status as "moribund" are unsourced. The lack of their updating of the past issues section their website is not evidence of their status any more than the continued presence of their website is evidence that it is still active. The website is up, the

4830:

Hi there, thank you for your help in improving the IJSMS wiki page. I would like to ask however why the image has been deleted? I work at International Marketing Reports in Bristol with the owner, Simon Rines. He owns all intellectual property rights to the publication. I am aware of the fact that

4163:

is hardly encyclopedic and really makes me doubt its accuracy. Yes, it is published by people from Columbia University, but apparently they don't edit it very thoroughly if they let articles like the one cited stand. Apart from that, there is not a single reference, so the article still needs more

4042:

Hi, well, I think it is borderline. Personally, I would not yet think it notable, but I am reasonably certain that an article on this journal would survive AfD: in the past, completely new journals from the American Chemical Association that had not even published a single issue, for example, have

3479:

I have referenced this article as far as possible.The issues you looked at (BHL?) are the trade magazine not the journal A very large number of taxa were described in Insekten-Börse and will link to this page. It is important that this work remains on wiki as the journal though very much quoted is

2554:

I thought of the same thing - about forgetting to log in. So, yes, that may be the case. However, it may be to avoid 3RR violations. At the same time, there has to be really good reasons to pursue this. In any case, the way this person edits with their Username we may not have to be concerned with

2472:

Well, such old works are difficult to class. The issue you link to above has a "letter to the king" and essays on the nobility, slavery, and the life of Wenworth, Count of Strafford. It doesn't really look academical to me, but like I said, with these old publications the distinction is not always

2046:

Amen to that. And it's what I try to do (after all, I edit under my own name and don't want to get a reputation as some querulous guy). But some people just wear your patience down completely and in this case, I faltered once (in that edit summary saying "vandalism") and got hammered on my head by

1019:

Thanks, I just can't quit... I'm spending too much time here and try to reduce, but I'm the either/or type of guy... My strategy is now to concentrate on one task and let the rest be, but that isn't so simple either... :-) Haven't heard about the SFN initiative for a while, is it still alive? Will

1860:

Of course you can post here, that's what talk pages are for! I, too, have similar experiences with WorldCat. I think it has to do with your IP. WorldCat seems to detect your IP and then searches the nearest libraries. So using different computers may give different results. However, I got similar

1053:

That's good news, the soft criteria that they had there have been a thorn in my side for a long time. They are still easy, compared to WP:PROF, for example (we don't deem someone notable if he has "had at least one publication in a peer-reviewed journal" :-). But it's an improvement. I'm baffled,

387:

I am not aware of pages about journals including specific articles that appear in them. (Moreover, editorials are, of course, not RS's.) Because I am the editor of the journal, I prefer not to edit the page myself. If you get a chance, would you review that page and do (or not do) whatever you

296:

Sorry, I only noticed you'd been editing it after I'd spent around 40 minutes perusing the online journal pdfs making periodic edits to an open edit window, but luckily the software sorted out the edit conflict cleanly for us! When I leave an edit summary of "intend further work" I usually mean I

4859:

Unless an image is published under a Creative Commons license, you cannot just upload it and say that you release it in the public domain, even if you own the copyright. After all, anybody could say they are you and have the right to do this... If you upload this image on the enWP itself, with a

3969:

There are no guidelines that I know of (doesn't mean there are none, as there are many that I don't know...) but I removed those templates because I have never seen them used in biographies (or their equivalents, botany for botanists, etc.; an exception are perhaps very notable figures, who were

3629:

I know. It is really surprising. It occurs to me that maybe both the current and historical versions are in print form only. Hence, not much at all the Web. Yet what I found listed at a library via World Cat focused on the historical name, not on the current name, which I had queried. The other

2085:

article. Accordingly I have supplied Andrew with some information about this editor, at the end of the discussion on his talkpage, that you may be unaware of. Personally I feel a few weeks 'enforced vacation' on this 'Disruptive' editor is overdue, if only to warn him his continued incivility to

1427:

offers a forum for research in the broad area of constitutional analysis, which lies at the intersection of several approaches in modern economics, sharing a common interest in the systematic integration of the institutional dimension - the study of political, legal and moral institutions - into

150:

3981286. I am guessing I might find a separate listing for each former journal at the Library of Congress, but I haven't tried that yet. Chemical Abstracts Service-CASSI seems to be sufficient for the moment. I may have to add these as references in the article, because I wrote about this in the

2101:

I agree with the "enforced vacation" for a few weeks. I knew that he was an experienced editor. I saw the Sockpuppets of LarkinToad2010 yesterday sometime. There is also some kind of history of disruptive editing just under this username. I also thought of their violation of the 3RR rule, but I

587:

not supposed to be a scholarly article, but rather a reader friendly overwiew of a person who has made some significant contribution, which can be further browsed with links to suitable external sources. Correct me if I am wrong. But can modify referencing to a certain style, if you so suggest.

5177:

I'm afraid all one can do is manually removing the articles that are from somebody else... I looked at that Quadsearch link (quite handy, although based on GS, which I don't like/trust much) and to me it seems that the medicine man is not cited as much as the computer guy. Removing all medical

2748:

I have done some cleanup to make the article more encyclopedic. I suggest that you re-work the publications section. It is better, in fact, to shorten this and rename it "Research". Then you should describer her research with the publications as references for that, rather than describing each

2027:

take the high-ground and be civil with everyone regardless of how they are behaving. My father would always tell me: "I don't care what you say about me, just be sure and spell my name right." My experiences on WP have shown me that you'll never run afoul of anyone if you are always civil in

857:

Hi Steve, no problem about the coden :-) Re the medialc journal thing: is this something general to all biomaterials journals? In that case, it is better to add the med journal cat to the biomaterials journals cat and not to the individual articles. (Ideally, the med journals/sci journals/acad

530:

6. This was an article which was tagged as an orphan and as one having few references. I have sat down for hours/days to remedy it. Thought it would be welcomed. Rather surprised to find these tags. Request you consider removing them after carefully rereading the article. Else you may use your

304:

from Oxford; however looking more carefully there are no address details in recent instructions to authors, and putting the editorial assistant's name into Google, she's apparently a contractor for a UK company who works online! I've removed the country from the info box and reworded the lead.

3528:

According to the Library of Congress this publication was merged with another to form Entomologische Zeitschrift mit Insektenbörse (ISSN: 0013-8843). I believe it is common practice at WikiProject Academic Journals to use the most current title, and place something such as this article in the

2386:

I am not sure of your recent recatergorisation of Le Censeur to french magazine. Is that where people would look for it and is the French Journal category only for academic journals? It just looks to me a bit anachronistic with the other magazines in the french magazine category. Best wishes,

4909:

Hello again Guillaume2303. Just a quick note on my edit from yesterday. Sorry to pick up on something so petty but correcting the sentence 'Since 2004 it has been published by International Marketing Reports' just makes more sense in English. If you could revert back to that it would be much

2573:

I was just reading through LarkinToad2010's talk page. There was more stuff that could have been mentioned at the ANI. However, what we provided turns out to be sufficient. I notice that you, DGG, Cameron Scott, and probably others, have been experiencing this person's uncivil behavior, and

2535:

I'm not sure anything can (or should) be done about this. Many editors forget from time to time to log in and then edit as an IP. This is not regarded as sockpuppetry. Only if the IPs would be used as seemingly independent editors supporting, for instance, LarkinToad2010 in deletion or merge

4962:. I merely wrote out this text from the web site last night. My English being much worse than yours, I was inventing my own English text the whole morning. Now I’m about to insert the new text instead of the previous one, with your improvements being retained. Would you mind my doing that?-- 4197:

who is well cited. The board of editors in Iransehansi including many Western scholars and universitiy Professors in the West. I do not need to add additional sources to satisfy your curiosity as your statement " I doubt Iranica.." is itself invalid. As for the author it is Abbas Milani

5310:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add

4472:

Ok, thanks, I asked DDG. You could give me your honest opinion though, by email if you don't want to make it public. Knowledge (XXG) articles often suffer errors of omission, so someone who knows about a topic can help that way, even if involved. For example, can you spot what is wrong

1038:

I'm not aware of anything in San Diego about WP, although I'll be there. There are a few good new editors in neuroscience, although not as many as I would have hoped for. In another area that I think might interest you, WP:ATHLETE has been replaced by something with higher standards.

955:

does seem appropriate these days. I mean with the advances in ceramics that I just pointed out above, and the advances in biotechnology and biomaterials, personally I don't see a problem, and it is good thinking on your part. Yes, this is a good idea. Feel free to do the honors. ----

3988:

Thanks. That may well be the case. This exchange has made me more sensitive to this issue, and going forward I will be more alert to how this is handled, though I don't think I'll put in the energy at the moment to get more definitive answers. Thanks again, and have a nice week!

1178:

Hi, I see you are doing a cleanup of journal categories. Be careful not to be too narrow. Optics, for example, is both a scientific discipline (a subfield of physics) and an engineering discipline. Its journals are properly categorized both as physics journals and as engineering

3258:

Anyway, thanks for helping clean up the page, by the way. We noticed that it had been sitting blank for 2 yrs (someone created it in 2008 with no content), so we wanted to at least get some content up there. I'll let you do the honors of fixing the content to read correctly.

664:

Thanks for the guidance. Will study it and get back in case of difficulty. I agree writing a biography needs to tread a fine balance. May just get me going with some other biographies which merit inclusion. Let me do justice to this one first. Will keep you posted when it's

2659:

Ok, but what does it mean? Is there an entry for me somewhere that I don't know about? Or, did it get inserted because I was awarded barnstars, or for some other reason? What's the point of having it there (with the colon and without)? Thanks, and sorry to bother you.

2452:

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=c4c3AAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Le+Censeur+europ%C3%A9en&hl=en&ei=--WLTPj5MIrLOI2R2a8K&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=Le%20Censeur%20europ%C3%A9en&f=false

3797:

When I have a moment, I'll look into M&M (unless Steve beats me to it :-). I don't think I'll jump into the Fetzer article, though: I'm not very current with conspiracy theories (nor do I have much patience with them), so I'm not the right person for that. BTW, what

2028:

discourse, dispite the mud being thrown your way. As frustrating as it might be to be improperly accused of some misbehavoir or genetic flaw in intelligence, it is far better to ignore it, pursue the meat of the discussion in a civil manner and in the simplest terms,

3970:

founders of their fields, for instance - but I did not check that either). If you want to be certain whether that is because there is a guideline against it or whether it was just something idiosyncratic that I did, then you could try the helpdesk. Hope this helps. --

2640:

of that category... I assumed that it was part of the links on your page and inserted a colon, which displays it but doesn't categorize you. I found it by looking in the category Notable Wikipedians, which should contain articles, not userpages. Hope this clarifies.

3495:

I don't understand: there is no deletion tag on the article currently, only a notability tag. I have no time now to see whether notability has been established sufficiently by the references you have added, but will get back to this in a few days from now, I hope.

151:

introduction section of the article. This is certainly interesting. I was wondering if you think a separate section for this information would be best? Also I have to fix the link for the reference CAS-CASSI (I wonder if this is what caused the confusion?) ----

3763:, appears to be a giant mess. For the record, I'm not affiliated with him or the journal in any way. It just so happens that the journal usually has good book reviews, one of which I've added to an article here, and used another paper as source for the main 3251:

Alright, good sir. We have updated our webpage to clean up any misunderstanding. If anything, this whole conundrum fixed that! Turns out it was a postal requirement from many years back that had never been updated (our journals are shipped from the printing

1133:

well enough. I have published there. It really should be listed under Category:Scientific research methods journals. It is much more than a business and management journal although I would not object to leaving that category in place. Let me know what you

2032:. When you do that, others will eventually come to your defense and that's what you want to happen. You'll never need to ask for it, as your perennial behavior will be of a style that most of us want every editor and admin to aspire to. Happy editing.-- 715:" words. Also, statements have to be sourced. You write that she had philosophical discussions with some people: is this important for the reader to know? How do you know? Personal knowledge like "I saw it" or "she told me" are not allowed on WP, you need 582:

1. I included Index Copernicus Scientists panel because it gives a whole list to papers published in her name. That, I thought, was not trivial at all for anyone wanting to know the person in more detail. You could consider revising your opinion there.

2004:

Guillaume2303. My second was aimed primarily at LarkinToad2010 as I was very aware the accusations he made against DGG. I am unaware of similar behavior on your part so no, the second was not aimed at you. But, that said, Andy's advice is sound if it

4349:

Hi Steve, looks like I managed to be obnoxious to you twice in a day! I apologize for that, I really didn't intend to irritate you. I put some comments in the edit summary, but apparently that didn't explain my edits enough, my bad. It is true that the

2412:, which was kind of a disambiguation page already, has been made an explicit dab now. So, yes, we use "journal" only in the sense of academic journals, everything else is magazine/newspaper, etc. I think there are many examples of old periodicals like 2177:

I think I'm missing something: that ban request was for an IP (not on the list of LarkinToad's socks) and as far as I can see unrelated to TideRolls message on LT's talk. That LT has no desire for constructive dialog is abundantly evident, of course.

2840:

Good job! I've removed all templates (save one, I'll check on that later). I have also added some wikilinks and would appreciate if you could check whether I have indeed linked to the correct persons. Been a pleasure working with you! Happy editing!

3513:

and elsewhere on Funet when you can when you can .The confusion lies in the fact that many taxonomists Hans Fruhstorfer and Ottto Staudinger especially were also dealers. Notorious might be a better word than notable and it's certainly hard to

1701:

I agree about the MALS link. Also, I agree that the journal probably is not notable. In any case, if it stays it should be moved to either "Confluence (journal)" or "Confluence (magazine)". There's a similar case (and a similar discussion) at

443: 351:

reference, because JCR is a subscription-only database (so a direct link to their entry for a certain journal will work for me, and then only within a particular session, but not for anybody else). All that could be added as a "reference" is

1194:

Thanks for pointing that out. I'm indeed cleaning up all those cats, creating new ones where necessary, etc. Science being as vast as it is, and I myself being limited as I am :-), I'm bound to make mistakes here, so help is appreciated.

5041:

and I was wrong to remove it. The Peterson reference doesn't have much added value, there is already another (also non-independent) reference. I'll be curious to hear what they say. 13 volumes in 29 years is not a good track record... --

3455:

or by blanking the page and replacing the text with {{db-author}} (which will have the article deleted within a few hours). Asking somebody else to author the article will not help. The real problem with this article is notability, not

2106:

among other things. Apparently there are now at least three of us, and DGG may get onboard with us. This user also referred to me as a vandal. I later removed some of the sections referring to DGG and I in this manner as off topic and

330:, if you've checked the IF against the official report, could you add a direct reference, please? I can't access the reports. (I don't think we should use that wording where we're dependent on taking the publisher's word for the IF.) 1289:

Yes, you can just create them. To stay in line with existing titles (and WP:MOS), I suggest "Computer science bibliographic databases" and "Computer science bibliographies" (note only a cap at the start of the title). Happy editing!

4499:

That older version did indeed look rather POV. Looks like you did a very good job on that one. Psychiatry is a contested subject, there are quite a lot of POV editors around that take every opportunity to try to make it look bad...

1272:

Each of these should be have a see also (IMO) to several related and to what's listed at Category:Computer_science_journals#See also (the 'see also' should probably be managed in one place and shown on the 5-6 relevant categories).

3610:

Mmm, I didn't miss that, just don't really know what to say... :-) It's very unusual that we have more sources for an old journal like IB, but not much for a currently existing one... Perhaps Notafly can come up with something...

2758:

Think have done what you advised. Request not to remove matter, as lot of effort has gone to summarise main writings of the subject. References Wikified too. You may decide to remove tags now. The experience was tiring but good.

446: 4168:: "Iranian literary scholars" is a subcategory of "Iranian academics" (the category "Iranian Scholars" does not exist) and it is therefore not necessary (and even incorrect) to add both. Hope this explains. Happy editing! -- 3782:

This looks like a good one to me - impact factor - 0.783, and it is indexed in several pretty choice databases. Also Springer presents the info so that it is quite accessible. This POV statement was brought to you by. ----

1651:

Hi. The tag asks help to expand. I added Master of Arts in Liberal Studies. Confluence has been there as a link for awhile. So I thought it would follow MALS could be a link on the Confluence page. It was deleted. Not sure

898:

The original problem is that there is no (Category:Biomaterials journals). In any case, (Category:Biotechnology journals) will cover this, and I can always start a new category if there are enough Biomaterials journals.

2431:

Dear Guillaume2303, Hi - again. I have had a look at the journal itself now and it looks very very very like an academic journal (albeit an old one). I think it might be better off with academic journals than with

454:. It appears that the journal switched publishers in 1994, but the journal may actually go all the way back to 1963, according to this last external link at the National Library of Australia. What do you think? ---- 134: 4023:(actually a particular APA Division; and it is hosted on the APA website). So it has strong institutional backing. But perhaps because it is new (Vol 1 was 2009), it is only listed as indexed in the APA's own 468:

Also the journal lists five editors on the Wiley Blackwell home page, but only one Editor in Chief. So I am intending to mention only the Editor in Chief in the infobox and prose portion of this article. ----

1666:

The MALS link was probably removed by mistake. Sorry about that. The article needed to be rewritten to agree with available sources. Please go ahead and restore the link, it is related to this article. ----

5107:

article for deletion, and it looks as a borderline case. As (if I remember correctly) you were commenting on notability in academic-related cases, I'd certainly appreciate your input on AfD discussion for

2905:

I don't mind much about that tag, but if I remove it now, somebody else (or even a bot) would put it back, because not a single article currently links to this one (that's what "orphan article" means...).

2620:

You put me in the "notable wikipedians" category. I don't mind being notable, but how did you arrive at that conclusion? I'm going to delete it unless you can provide a reasonable explanation. Thanks.

2403:

Given its age, it would probably look anachronistic everywhere... :-) I think that by now, the journals by language and journals by frequency categories are the only ones that have not yet been renamed to

3426:

Guillaume2303 - learning this site. Should I take article down and ask someone else to author? If so, how do I remove? Any suggestions on authors? Also, what does please only use PROD on this site mean?

4991:

Many thanks for your editing! And I didn’t expect such an appraisal of my English. I’ve already copied your amendments into MS Word and learned them by heart. I always do that when somebody corrects my

3411:

Here is what I am referring to: "Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist"

140: 113:

I have been meaning to have a look at this myself, in order to help to determine what it is. Unfortunately, I have been busy with another matter. Apologies. Hopefully, I can take a look sometime today.

838: 1219:, etc. However, I think it's legitimate to have bibliographies in that category; there's no equivalent level in bibliographies, and this helps find things. I know that you must disagree because of 2445: 1569:

Hi, the article on Confluence could use some work, but I don't think notability is an issue. It's registered in the LOC as noted, and also there's been an internal link here at WP for some time

1685:

OK, I see what happened. It was part of the text that was rewritten. I placed the MALS link in the "See also" section, because I don't think it belongs in the text. What is your opinion? ----

4749:(apparently the PR department of Kellwood...), but perhaps this one could remain. Feel free to revert me, I haven't even watchlisted that page as it is not in my normal sphere of interest. -- 3044:

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

2782:) for his/her opinion, but I am pretty certain that they'll agree with my assessment. The research section needs to be cut down considerably and become more informative and more condensed. -- 4903: 4824: 4599:? It's about the reliability (or lack thereof) of some sociology and/or evolutionary psychology papers. Looking at your article page here, you don't appear involved with that topic. Thanks, 179:

as it is and putting this information together makes for more substantial articles (that often are also more interesting to read). The old names should be created as redirects, of course. --

4370:

they refer to the publication as "journal" and then as "magazine" in the next phrase, note that the navigation bar reads "Science Magazine"). Some publications are very clearly a magazine (

1938: 2125:

I agree, I don't have much patience with people who start yelling "vandal" or "troll" at me and I have gone out of my way to try to talk some sense into this person for long enough now. --

4888:. I did this because I now feel that the info I have can not be properly verified at this time. Would you mind making sure I corrected my edit properly? Thanks please respond on my page. 2859:

Thanks for the kind words. Thanks also for taking the trouble to introduce links. Most correct except one which I have corrected. It's D.P. Chattopdhyaya, not Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya .

5129:

Thanks for the notification. Indeed, I used to be quite active at academic-related AfD, but life has become much more agreeable now that I have abandoned that... (at least mostly :-) --

876:. I did not know there was such a category. Yes, this is the category to use, not medical journals. You are correct. Thanks for pointing this out. Another related category, probably is 3318:

That's hilarious, thanks for bringing it to my attention. And I'm afraid that many scientific articles are written in a similar way, too. Mmm, perhaps even some WP articles... :-) --

144: 3038: 2081:. Along with other editors I have had occasion to try and help this editor (who has been on Wiki longer than his 'current' username indicates), including editing and advice on the 2444:. Have you had a look at it - it is far more like an academic journal than all those political magazines -pamphlets etc ? I think this link might work for a volume of Le Censeur 1840:

and at work a (Uni account) I get a US holding of 724 whilst at home I only get 643 - would you have any idea what was going on and have you confirmed either figure? Also are the

1497:, for instance, although the link you give does mention that area. I just thought that "Political science journals" was a bit too much, feel free to put it back if I was mistaken. 921:

use the top categories (academic, scientific, medical, humanities), figuring that sooner or later someone will get to emptying them and recategorizing nto appropriate cats. There

356:, 2010" (2010, because IFs are always published in the next year). I usually am too lazy to do that as it does not seem to add much to "According to the JCR, its 2009 IF is"... -- 1471:

Thank you for your consideration. I'll look for your comments, if any, here. If you have a jillion other things to do first, that's fine too. Similarly, if you'd like to Edit

4027:. I suspect its indexing and influence will grow over time, given its backing. But at present, do you think the journal is sufficiently notable for its own WP page? Thanks -- 521:

3. Articles published before 2000 in different journals are not archived on the respective journal websites. Have therefore taken them as referenced on the subjects website.

4164:

references and notability still needs to be established. I'll put the tags back, please don't remove them unless you address the underlying problem. As for the categories at

3767:

article. Fetzer does seem to have most peculiar views about a number of things. That reminds me of the joke "What's the difference between a terrorist and a full professor?"

205:

which was left as a redirect to nothing - maybe I should have left that, if you are going to put something back as its target; but you can re-create it if you like. Regards,

2946: 1242:

is filled with CS papers, too, and still we don't put journals in the CS papers category. Perhaps you should create a "computer science bibliographic databases" category? --

1500:

ad 2/ That statement would be way too subjective and promotional. Just a succinct description of what they publish (instead of what may be their intentions) should suffice.

4528:

qualifies for an article here? I can't find a resume of him, so a sketchy stub would be all I can muster, but he is Head of Department, and wrote a fair number of books.

1463:. On reflection, your removing it may have been warranted at least because it wrapped to the next line (not a pretty dangler). Would you object to reinsertion of say "( 801:), or porous for tissue ingrowth (hydroxyapatite-coated metals, alumina). Applications include replacements for hips, knees, teeth, tendons, and ligaments and repair for 379: 2102:

noticed the editors who are willing to take action are not yet organized. I was waiting of DGG to return to the article, and begin calling them on the 3RR rule, and

1507:

On the article talk page is a link to a guide for writing journal articles. Have a look at that, it may give you ideas on how to expand the article. Happy editing! --

1238:

I'm not sure how else to explain. "Computer science papers" is for articles about certain papers. A bibliographic database is quite another thing. A computer science

4195: 5358:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

5354:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 4439:

Since I'm the only editor there in recent times besides Rose himself, perhaps you could review my changes and make any corrections if you deem necessary. Thanks.

4366:. The latter, in fact, often talks about "Science Magazine", too (their domain name even is "sciencemag.org"), yet everybody regards it as a scientific journal. ( 594:

4. Can try and remedy this writeup, but need that little guidance. Kindly do find the time for it. Thanks for your prompt response. And your continued interest.

3511: 3180:"It is published by the Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, Florida 33149-1031 U.S.A." 3030:. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the 2446:

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=RQAGAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22Le%20Censeur%22&source=gbs_book_other_versions#v=onepage&q&f=false

1316:

Undoing a move is no more complicated than doing it in the first place, so I must say I am confused as to the requirement that I do it myself. What happened to

1833: 4793:. While I was burrowing into English textbooks in order to say the same in my own words, you saved the article from deletion. And helped me with my English.-- 3930:

Hi, just letting you know that the above canvassing single purpose attack account is been confirmed as a sockpuppet of another single purpose attack account.

1545:

by cutting down information costs, frustration, and time (more direct than negotiating menus to Zoom if that possibility occurs to the reader), there is no '

5163:

It looks like there are two KJ Sullivans: one in computer science and one in medicine. That results in an omnibus h-index. Is there a way to separate them?

4621:

is a former journal turned into a database of sorts (really just an on-line-only publication). I'm not sure how to make an infobox for something like that.

4454:

Sorry, I'm personally acquainted with Steve and don't think I would be an objective editor (and also a bit short on time right now). Perhaps you should try

2267: 3443: 1592: 1055: 2894: 1417:

2. Given your remarkable range of Edits for journals, what would you think of inserting a quotation of the Description link to look something like this:

917:

Ah, I thought there was, but I was a bit groggy (couldn't sleep...) and didn't check. As you say, it'll be easy to create if needed. In similar cases, I

699: 1595:). Have a look also at the guide to writing journal articles (linked in the banner on the article's talk page) to get an idea of what is needed here. -- 578:

Since I wrote the revision, I take responsibility for it being badly written etc. Now for some clarifications and guidance, if you can spare some time:

201:

I have deleted this, per your G6 request, but I couldn't find the actual article you meant to move there. Anyway, the way is clear now. I also deleted

5057:

Actually, it is accurate, not that it establishes notability in and of itself. In any case, here is the reply I received from the PUR per my inquiry:

4354:

website systematically refers to the thing as a "magazine". It is indeed kind of a hybrid thing, but I took my cue from similar hybrid journals like

4219: 1541:

On ad 3/ There was all-too-much reason for your puzzlement. Whatever the general merits of trying to make links more accessible to more readers with

1396:

in title). Also appreciated your careful thumbnail Edit summaries. May I respond to some points & ask questions (to which you could interpolate

3858:

Yeah, it's probably much better to spend one's time with the biographies of more scientifically productive (and less controversial) academics, like

439:

I am creating an article for this journal. You might be familiar with it in your line of work. In any case, the homepage on Wiley Blackwell is here

167: 4932:

I'll make that change, but it's not a revert, as the original text read "Since 2004 it has published by International Marketing Reports"... :-) --

4637: 3397:

Guillaume2303 - the date was taken off because it was a suggested protocol. Your advise on steps for inclusion of this journal are appreciated.

1460: 1444: 1362:

You can move a page over a redirect as long as that redirect has no history (in which case you do need a n sdmin to delete the offending page.)

3183:

I know it also mentions Allen Press, but all they do is print for us. We do all the publishing at the Univeristy of Miami's Rosenstiel school.

1967:

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to

534:

7. I am no fan, but reading the achievements of a woman, and that too from a developing country, I would not hesitate to applaud her efforts.

1923: 1587:

WP links really have zero impact on notability... WHat is LOC (just woke up, so perhaps I'm still a bit slow)... I don't see how this meets

648:

this helps. As I said before, I don't have time to work on this directly myself, but feel free to pose any questions here. Happy editing! --

4564:

See the bottom of my talk page; if you want to work on it still, please go ahead. If you don't have time, I'll look at expanding it later.

1930: 4831:

Knowledge (XXG) is open to anyone but to have work edited substantially without prior consultation was somewhat surprising. Many thanks.

767:

For example, here is a reference and part of quote: "Ceramics used for the repair and reconstruction of diseased or damaged parts of the

611:

You should start with having a look at some of the links that are in the "welcome" template that I put on your user talk page. Especially

3127:

I reviewed the article and found no peacock wording. I also left a note on the article talk page. By the way, did you get my email? ----

4917: 4636:

According to their website, they regard it as a database themselves, too, so perhaps you could take the bibliographic database infobox (

4011:

Hello again. You seem to know quite a bit about academic journals, so let me ask you a question: At the present time, would the journal

3089: 1260: 926: 837:

I am still looking into biomaterials. Here is a google book link, so you can briefly look at this subject, and perhaps see what I mean:

5235:

Hello mister, I just wanted to thank you for contributing to wikipedia! If only all the scientists were like you! a french wikipedian!

2291:. Are there more specific recommendations that you can make on changes that will, in your opinion, improve the quality of the article? 4728:, but rather than simply revert you ... since I know you are a careful editor, I thought I would inquire as to your thinking. Best.-- 4020: 1727: 100: 4144:

and type in the name of the journal and Encyclopaedia. The one you put a tag for is published by Columbia Universitity. Thank you--

3027: 2945:

Because you were involved in at least one of these disputes you might (or might not) be interested in commenting at this ANI thread

1979:

to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article.

1340: 92: 87: 75: 70: 62: 3442:

Jlukewood: as far as I can see, this journal does not yet satisfy the "notability" requirements of Knowledge (XXG). Have a look at

1149:

I actually agree and don't really know what happened there... Should go to bed, have done way too much categorizing today... :-) --

4578: 4282: 1440: 1405: 1389: 1336: 1216: 174:. The link was not a cause for confusion (there wasn't much confusion, I guess), I just thought it strange to say that a journal 3840:

Yeah, sorry, I am not interested in the Fetzer article either, and I don't read, write about, or edit conspiracy theories. ----

1968: 3278: 3205: 1256:

Is there a process to go through to create a category and sort it properly? Or do you just create it? Two new ones are needed:

1054:

though, that they could get such a complicated many-faceted guideline accepted, while we (=us science types) couldn't agree on

877: 4095:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 3686:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 4111:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

3702:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

2890: 2868: 2828: 2810: 2767: 2738: 695: 673: 601: 541: 5346:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 841: 5359: 4078: 3669: 297:

plan to work on it immediately (I tend to save whenever I have to leave my computer as we have frequent power cuts here).

3177:

I am the assistant to the editor at the Bulletin of Marine Science. You keep changing our wikipage to read incorrectly.

1494: 1328: 3031: 4032: 3994: 3959: 3480:

hardly covered elsewhere. Can you remove the deleton tag please or discuss the issue further. All the best Robert aka

3225:. 2/ If you are personally involved with a subject, it is often not a good idea to edit the article on it. Please see 2023:

Although many editors don't agree with my approach to incivility, I find it works for me and recommend it to others.

3357:

For your constancy in tidying up newly-created journal articles, you are hereby awarded the Recent Changes barnstar.

2341: 1704: 753:. It is an old edit, and I removed it. I meant see CASSI biliographic page (I need to supply the reference for this). 3082:

why is there no reference to the statue in the article except in the lede? read the lasp post on te discussion page

253:

I'm still actively working on this -- to avoid edit conflict, could you work on something else for a while, please?

226:

I restored the article, but if you object tell me; and I'll userfy it. But I'd rather keep it out in the open until

4847: 4396:

does). I hope this explains my edits, but if it doesn't convince you, I'm happy to leave things as they are now. --

4112: 4098: 3703: 3689: 1323:

However, I must note I do not feel strongly compelled by a style guideline that is clearly not very well followed:

1278: 1228: 41: 4329: 5001: 4967: 4959: 4798: 4790: 4783: 4684:

Wow, I knew he was way up there, but this is even more than I thought! Definitely a very notable psychiatrist. --

2980: 1344: 336: 311: 286: 259: 4121: 2345: 1976: 2886: 2864: 2824: 2806: 2763: 2734: 2710: 2665: 2626: 2532:

I looked at the contributions of those IPs, and it appears you are probably correct. So what is the next step?

2522: 2502: 2494: 2243: 2167: 2091: 1892: 691: 669: 597: 537: 353: 272: 171: 4328:

is a magazine. Those "journal" categories are incorrect. Those will probably have to be undone. See this link

1896: 758:

Second, regarding the medical journal category: biomaterials have applications in the medical profession, and

531:

editorial discretion and remove/rearrange what you find contentious. Really don't know what further can I do.

4921: 5254: 5183: 5134: 5046: 4982: 4937: 4869: 4813: 4754: 4689: 4645: 4549: 4505: 4463: 4401: 4233: 4209: 4173: 4149: 4141: 4052: 3975: 3892: 3807: 3616: 3578: 3501: 3464: 3382: 3323: 3238: 3093: 2996: 2911: 2846: 2787: 2684: 2646: 2597: 2541: 2506: 2478: 2421: 2368: 2325: 2215: 2183: 2130: 2052: 1866: 1817: 1780: 1735: 1713: 1657: 1622: 1600: 1577: 1572:. But I could always use some help on how best to expand it, because I hate to see another stub out there... 1512: 1332: 1295: 1247: 1200: 1154: 1091: 1063: 1025: 979: 934: 863: 768: 733: 653: 564: 408: 361: 184: 50: 17: 4913: 4835: 4137: 3266: 3193: 3085: 2882: 947:

Emptying the top categories sounds like a good future project (for me), as much as I am able. Categorizing

687: 4071: 4028: 3990: 3955: 3662: 3067: 2201: 2078: 1994: 1409: 1072:

I helped get it through, and the complexity was actually what made enough sports fans go along with it. --

422: 393: 5269: 382:; the editor added a comment that appeared in an editorial about an article that appeared in the journal. 5342: 5250: 5179: 5130: 5042: 4978: 4933: 4893: 4865: 4809: 4750: 4685: 4641: 4545: 4501: 4459: 4420: 4397: 4339: 4229: 4169: 4083: 4048: 3971: 3935: 3888: 3845: 3803: 3788: 3674: 3635: 3612: 3597: 3574: 3552: 3534: 3497: 3460: 3378: 3362: 3319: 3234: 3132: 2992: 2968:

Hi Guillaume2303, I just wanted to drop you a note that I declined the speedy deletion tag you added to

2954: 2907: 2842: 2783: 2680: 2642: 2593: 2579: 2560: 2537: 2474: 2417: 2364: 2321: 2211: 2179: 2126: 2116: 2048: 1862: 1813: 1776: 1765: 1731: 1709: 1690: 1672: 1640: 1618: 1596: 1554: 1508: 1480: 1291: 1274: 1243: 1224: 1196: 1150: 1087: 1059: 1021: 975: 961: 930: 904: 885: 873: 859: 848: 729: 649: 560: 491: 474: 459: 404: 357: 195: 180: 156: 119: 5307: 5097: 4108: 3699: 3544: 5315:}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ 2473:

clear. I have just added the category "French political magazines", as this seems most appropriate. --

1493:

ad 1/ It's not necessary to categorize the journal in every possible category. It was not pu into the

505:

I saw the following tag on the article 'Shakuntala Singh' in Knowledge (XXG) above attributed to you:

4997: 4963: 4794: 4772: 4746: 4733: 4573: 4311: 4277: 4260: 4254: 4194:

is established as it is from a university source written by a very published author (Abbas Milani).

3920: 3049: 2974: 2235: 2151: 2143: 2037: 2010: 1077: 1044: 1009: 786: 331: 326: 306: 281: 254: 4044: 3428: 3413: 3398: 3295: 3270: 3197: 2509:

that I believe he has just used to revert changes to his Philip Larkin and Larkin 25 based edits on

1832:

Dear Guillaume2303,I hope it is OK to bother you and ask this. When looking for things for this Afd

712: 5085: 5030: 3863: 3432: 3417: 3402: 3307: 3274: 3201: 3113: 3023: 3008: 2991:

I agree we need an article on it, I just thought it might be easier to start from scratch... :-) --

2706: 2661: 2622: 2518: 2498: 2302: 2239: 2163: 2087: 2074: 2067: 1617:

and tries to be as inclusive as possible, so this does not mean anything for notability, either. --

1542: 1184: 802: 202: 5351: 5225: 2750: 1900: 624: 300:

As to the editorial office, it was in Oxford when it was with IRL and the journal still says it's

5281: 5240: 5168: 4707: 4674: 4626: 4604: 4533: 4482: 4444: 4224: 4205: 4145: 4090: 3871: 3859: 3827: 3772: 3760: 3750: 3736: 2514: 2510: 1946: 1795:

I am going to try to have a serious discussion with that editor; I had not noticed him before.

1653: 1573: 524:

4. Have tried to copyedit to the best of my ability. If any further needed, you may kindly help.

231: 220: 1504:

type as their default). In any case, it's not clear and it is the first time I've seen it on WP.

5025:

currently traveling, so it may not be for a few days. I ask for your patience in this regard.

4839: 1613:

PS: if with LOC you mean the Library of Congress, that is rather trivial: the Library catalogs

440: 5417: 5404: 5221: 5109: 5104: 4699: 4525: 4362: 3519: 3485: 3064: 2931: 2461: 2437: 2405: 2392: 2197: 2158:

by 'TideRolls was removed, unanswered, from the talkpage a few days later by 'LarkinToad2010'

1990: 1849: 1367: 1352: 1347:). Feel free to revert the move, but I don't feel sorry in thinking it was not inappropriate. 809:, and bone fillers after tumor surgery. Carbon coatings are thromboresistant and are used for 418: 389: 239: 5355: 1317: 616: 5330: 5154: 5117: 4955: 4948: 4889: 4416: 4356: 4335: 3951: 3931: 3841: 3784: 3764: 3723: 3631: 3593: 3548: 3530: 3358: 3163: 3128: 2969: 2950: 2575: 2556: 2441: 2275: 2112: 1761: 1686: 1668: 1636: 1550: 1476: 1169: 1139: 957: 900: 881: 844: 824: 487: 470: 455: 210: 152: 115: 5372: 4861: 3456: 3447: 3226: 3222: 3151: 2676: 2497:. Please note the users specific edits! I have just tagged him as a suspect sockpuppet of 2108: 2103: 1986: 1588: 620: 5421: 5400: 5312: 5300: 5286: 5258: 5244: 5187: 5172: 5158: 5138: 5121: 5089: 5050: 5034: 5005: 4986: 4971: 4941: 4925: 4897: 4873: 4851: 4817: 4802: 4776: 4768: 4758: 4737: 4729: 4711: 4693: 4678: 4660: 4649: 4630: 4608: 4585: 4568: 4553: 4537: 4509: 4486: 4467: 4448: 4424: 4405: 4343: 4325: 4315: 4307: 4289: 4272: 4237: 4213: 4177: 4153: 4056: 4036: 3998: 3979: 3963: 3939: 3924: 3916: 3896: 3875: 3849: 3831: 3811: 3792: 3776: 3754: 3730: 3681: 3639: 3620: 3601: 3582: 3556: 3538: 3523: 3505: 3489: 3468: 3436: 3421: 3406: 3386: 3368: 3327: 3312: 3282: 3242: 3209: 3167: 3147: 3136: 3117: 3097: 3072: 3053: 3045: 3000: 2985: 2958: 2935: 2915: 2898: 2872: 2850: 2832: 2814: 2791: 2771: 2742: 2714: 2688: 2669: 2650: 2630: 2601: 2583: 2564: 2545: 2526: 2482: 2465: 2425: 2396: 2372: 2357: 2349: 2329: 2309: 2285: 2247: 2219: 2205: 2187: 2171: 2134: 2120: 2095: 2056: 2041: 2033: 2014: 2006: 1998: 1950: 1916: 1870: 1853: 1821: 1806: 1784: 1769: 1739: 1717: 1694: 1676: 1661: 1644: 1626: 1604: 1581: 1570: 1558: 1516: 1484: 1404:

1. The Edit that removed Category:Political science is contrary to the "Description" link

1371: 1356: 1299: 1282: 1251: 1232: 1204: 1188: 1173: 1158: 1143: 1095: 1081: 1073: 1067: 1048: 1040: 1029: 1013: 1005: 983: 965: 938: 908: 889: 867: 852: 794: 737: 703: 677: 657: 628: 605: 568: 545: 495: 478: 463: 426: 412: 397: 365: 341: 316: 291: 264: 243: 214: 188: 160: 123: 5347: 4201: 4191: 4187: 3230: 2753:

may be helpful for formatting references. Once all that has been done, the tags can go...

1114:

I now understand why I should not insert Category:Science journal in the entries for the

716: 612: 166:

Hi Steve, I think it would be best to put this in a "History" section. See for instance

5316: 5081: 5026: 4993: 4843: 4304: 3299: 3158:

about the hook to use for the article, and your input would be very welcome. Regards,

3109: 2298: 2073:

Hi Guillaume2303! Whilst following up on some other matters I noted your problems with

1914: 1895:

is now the single most-linked disambiguation page, which has to be fixed manually. Per

1180: 828: 790: 644: 636: 483:

Here is a Library of Congress listing for the German name version established in 1963,

445:

and Library of Congres the journal was established in 1994, and also has a German name

4884:

I looked at my links and the information I had and I have dicide to remove my edit of

2778:

what is needed. If you doubt my judgement, ask some other experienced editor (such as

5273: 5236: 5164: 4885: 4703: 4670: 4667: 4622: 4618: 4600: 4596: 4529: 4478: 4440: 4372: 3867: 3823: 3768: 3746: 2592:

Yeah, perhaps we've been too patient. But I don't like going through ANI and such. --

2162:. That gave me the impression he has no interest in what other editors concerns are. 1942: 1802: 1455:

others with poor vision (like mine) to not give up but to enlarge by clicking on the

806: 762:

concerns biomaterials. In addition bioceramics are part of the biomaterials sciences.

640: 632: 376:

Hello, Guillaume2303. I write due to your interest in WP pages on academic journals.

5378:

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

4102: 3743: 721: 5413: 5217: 4165: 3515: 3481: 3041:

until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

2927: 2705:

Ok, thanks. I don't really want to go through my history so I'll just delete it.

2457: 2388: 2147: 1975:. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the 1845: 1452: 1363: 1348: 843:. There is also an article on Knowledge (XXG), but for now I prefer the books. ---- 235: 4745:

Hi, perhaps I was too fast on that one. I was reverting a couple of spam edits by

4332: 3693: 2803:

I trust your judgement, no need to ask anyone else, unless you want it that way.

2536:

discussions or to avoid 3RR violations, would this be considered sockpuppetry. --

2433: 929:, though. Would it perhaps be appropriate to categorize that one as "medical"? -- 280:/preclinical cancer research rather than oncology, and is not a medical journal. 5292: 5150: 5113: 5063: 4433: 3714: 3217:

I think there are three things here that you need to understand. 1/ This is not

3159: 1165: 1135: 805:, maxillofacial reconstruction, augmentation and stabilization of the jaw bone, 227: 206: 49:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4664: 3450:

to see what is needed. Note that "notability" in the WP sense is by no means a

3016: 4977:

Of course not, go ahead. I'll have a look after you're done. Happy editing! --

1760:

I added reference (source) for the Editor in Chief. Please see reference.----

810: 627:. Finally, take a look at some other biographies of scientists on WP, such as 5070:

Yes, the PUR is still in operation. We hope to have the website updated soon.

452: 4300: 3745:. Or is its impact factor too low for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG)? Thanks, 3342: 2142:

A previous 'Ban request' made direct to an experienced and uninvolved admin

2082: 1972: 1956: 1904: 725: 276:

falls within the "oncology" category of SCI, it actually publishes entirely

1635:

I left a comment on the talk page regarding the peer review question. ----

3186:

I will fix our webpage so it is not confusing about who the publisher is.

511:

While I appreciate your interest in improving the article, may I clarify:

403:

I see DGG has already taken care of this. I've watchlisted the article. --

4455: 4415:

or even "National Geographic", there is a clear difference. Thanks. ----

4392:

does publish peer-reviewed articles next to magazine-like sections (like

4024: 2779: 1797: 798: 782: 139:. It is correct that this is one journal, with 2 formernames. See here: 4996:. As for your remark “shorten slightly”, I’ll soon expand the article.-- 4016: 1963: 1549:

button for the link in question. End of discussion. Sorry about that. --

3150:

which you created has been nominated to appear on the main page in the

2409: 2317: 1884: 1877: 1410:

http://www.springer.com/social+sciences/political+science/journal/10602

778: 514:

1. I have tried to make the article as neutral and brief as possible.

3547:. Maybe you could give an opinion of some sort or other. Thanks. ---- 1331:! Plus it took me all of a few minutes to find several more examples ( 5303: 4125: 3155: 1989:- This includes not describing other editors efforts as "vandalism". 4367: 4334:. Also if you have a problem it would be wiser to discuss it. ---- 3950:

Hi, thanks for your cleanup of the new article I threw together re

2456:

I think Auguste Comte published his first work in it! Best wishes (

527:

5. Wikified as much as I could, but you could kindly help further.

417:

Thanks. And thank you also for your other additions to that page.

4015:

be considered notable enough for its own WP page? Its website is

3296:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/the-lay-scientist/2010/sep/24/1

2863:

I share the pleasure working with you. Appreciate the mentoring.

2196:

Yes - go back to 11th August or so and a different section head.

4299:

Could you please take a moment to comment on the changes to the

3510:

Sorry about that. Take a look here for Insekten-Börse references

2555:

sockpuppetry to take action in the future (if necessary). ----

1922:

Confluence : the journal of graduate liberal studies. listed at

148:

Continues: Moon and the planets 0165-0807 (DLC) 80645018 (OCoLC)

5385:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

4808:

My pleasure! And thanks for creating those journal articles! --

815:

Hench, Larry L. (1991). "Bioceramics: From Concept to Clinic".

484: 449: 147: 137: 5145:

Sure, no problem, I've managed to find somebody familiar with

4376:, for example), What was the clincher for me is the fact that 4066: 3657: 2799:

the scope of a wikipedia biography is less detailed, so be it.

28: 5399:

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off

4190:

source and notability is established by the article itself.

1929:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

5329: 5291: 4384:

has one, too, but it is only about 0.3). And in contrast to

1899:, we request help with the cleanup. One very useful tool is 4904:

International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship

4825:

International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship

3026:, which you created or to which you contributed, should be 2363:

Oh, yes, please, I completely forgot about that. Thanks! --

2047:

Andy... Oh well, on to other endeavors... Happy editing! --

1891:

to an article instead of the disambig? Since your change,

435:

Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research

5375:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. 4222:. Depending on the outcome of that discussion, I may take 2731:

Have a look now and see whether you want to remove tags.

1538:

On ad 2/ Point nicely made. I'll try to bear that in mind.

3039:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Dowden Health Media

1412:. So, why was it removed? (Easy enough to fix of course.) 1259:

Bibliographies of Computer Science (including lists like

683:

Look at the writeup now. You may decide to remove tags.

3759:

Also, the Knowledge (XXG) bio of the journal's founder,

3229:. 3/ Articles in Knowledge (XXG) should be sourced, see 5386: 5206: 4725: 4474: 2159: 2155: 1888: 1220: 385: 383: 5112:(regardless if it will be to keep or to delete :-) ). 4218:

I have taken this to the reliable sources noticeboard

1844:

being behind barriers a problem? Anyway best wishes, (

3742:

Would you mind creating an article for this journal?

1935:

Confluence : the journal of graduate liberal studies.

1931:

Confluence : the journal of graduate liberal studies.

3915:

Could use some help on Arthur Rubin delete request.

3573:

I already did yesterday, or did I miss something? --

3543:

Guillaume2303 - I invite you to read the talk page,

1903:(with the popupFixDabs flag set to true). Cheers! -- 1887:

points to a disambiguation page, could you help fix

1447:

link for the linked article. The intent of "(press

451:. However a quick search on Google revealed this -- 1535:

On ad 1/ Agreed on the possibility of overdoing it.

1441:

Constitutional Political Economy#Innaugural article

4954:Thank you very much for your amending the article 4668:http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/full/30/12/480-b 1435:3. An Edit with the comment "??" removed "(press 1261:List of important publications in computer science 1120:Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 4724:Hi Guillaume2303. I was confused by your revert 3022:A discussion has begun about whether the article 2234:Oops sorry my error that link should have been:- 2154:and the subsequent message posted on LarkinToads 1834:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Tim Lewens‎ 722:http://diberri.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/templatefiller/ 380:Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 3887:has been scheduled for DYK on WP's main page. -- 1728:Reinvention: A Journal of Undergraduate Research 1263:, etc. right?--those aren't papers <grin: --> 2926:I replied on my talk page with a brief update. 2493:I noticed you have placed a Welcome message on 1406:Constitutional Political Economy#External links 1122:. The category is too broad. Incidentally, the 4544:as a source for non-controversial material. -- 3393:Journal of African American Males in Education 619:are relevant. You should also have a look at 8: 4665:http://isbra2010paris.org/dwl/cv_Kendler.pdf 4477:? See the current version for some answers. 3189:Please stop making our wikipage incorrect. 3059:Connected Contributor vs. Notable Wikipedian 2878:See if you still want to keep the one tag. 2574:problematic editing, for quite awhile. ---- 2086:other editors is not going to be tolerated. 4958:. But there’s a problem similar to that of 3154:section. There is an active discussion at 2947:Stevertigo's Pattern of Problematic Editing 2268:Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences 2258:Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences 1937:redirect, you might want to participate in 1836:- I tried the World Cat thing for his book 5324:Orphaned non-free image File:JIVRcover.jpg 4656:H-index of 91 and no Knowledge (XXG) page? 3822:"You can negotiate with a terrorist." :-/ 1933:. Since you had some involvement with the 1527:Edit a bit on discovering outright errors. 4087:was updated with a fact from the article 4019:. As you can see, it is published by the 3678:was updated with a fact from the article 3340: 726:http://toolserver.org/~magnus/makeref.php 551:Obviously, the tags are a comment on the 4132:If you have a doubt about nobility or RS 1267:Computer Science Bibliographic Databases 486:which was in existence until 1994. ---- 168:Journal of the National Cancer Institute 5299:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}} has given you a 4638:Template:Infobox Bibliographic Database 4013:Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 2344:deleted as well? (I've already deleted 2265:I noticed that you recently tagged the 1020:something be organized in San Diego? -- 817:Journal of the American Ceramic Society 5392:To opt out of these bot messages, add 3063:I responded on my talk page. Thanks! 2501:along with another suspect sockpuppet 1392:with which I mostly agree (esp. liked 1004:I'm happy to see that you are back! -- 635:as examples of very famous people, or 372:(In-)appropriate edit to journal page? 47:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1591:(or even the much more lenient essay 1523:OK, thanks. I rushed my most recent 1215:I see that you're trying to clean up 1124:Journal of Health and Social Behavior 1116:Journal of Health and Social Behavior 7: 1941:(if you have not already done so). 5272:issue! I like a good consensus!! 2820:Have a look now. I think it's done. 927:Category:Materials science journals 5350:. However, the image is currently 4767:Sounds good. No worries. Best.-- 4021:American Psychological Association 2675:something like that, but who meet 1467:)" if it avoided the wrap problem? 1126:is also a social science journal. 829:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x 24: 3444:WP:Notability (academic journals) 3037:The article will be discussed at 1889:the links that need to be pointed 1593:WP:Notability (academic journals) 1056:WP:Notability (academic journals) 4070: 3661: 3341: 3015: 2210:Ah, OK, I see it now, thanks. -- 2077:and the resulting discussion on 1962: 1390:Constitutional Political Economy 1388:I feel honored by your Edits of 1379:Constitutional Political Economy 1217:Category:Computer science papers 1211:CS papers + bibliographies of CS 32: 5096:Borderline notability case per 4128:) 18:02, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 2342:User talk:Guillaume2303/Autobio 1705:Pittsburgh Undergraduate Review 1131:Organizational Research Methods 878:Category:Biotechnology journals 3621:08:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 3602:05:25, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 3583:03:48, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 3557:00:42, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 3539:15:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 3524:14:56, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 3506:14:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 3490:14:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 3283:14:27, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 3243:23:34, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 3210:20:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 3168:00:44, 28 September 2010 (UTC) 3137:19:56, 26 September 2010 (UTC) 3118:14:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC) 3098:10:58, 26 September 2010 (UTC) 3073:21:20, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 3054:20:41, 23 September 2010 (UTC) 3001:10:26, 23 September 2010 (UTC) 2986:10:23, 23 September 2010 (UTC) 2959:09:02, 20 September 2010 (UTC) 2936:17:59, 17 September 2010 (UTC) 2916:07:09, 20 September 2010 (UTC) 2899:19:40, 19 September 2010 (UTC) 2873:17:59, 16 September 2010 (UTC) 2851:08:29, 16 September 2010 (UTC) 2833:06:39, 16 September 2010 (UTC) 2815:18:02, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 2792:08:20, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 2772:04:59, 14 September 2010 (UTC) 2743:00:55, 11 September 2010 (UTC) 2715:02:04, 16 September 2010 (UTC) 2689:07:25, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 2670:03:36, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 2651:02:06, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 2631:02:03, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 2602:17:44, 16 September 2010 (UTC) 2584:17:38, 16 September 2010 (UTC) 2565:08:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 2546:08:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 2527:17:13, 13 September 2010 (UTC) 2483:07:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC) 2466:20:09, 11 September 2010 (UTC) 2426:12:05, 11 September 2010 (UTC) 2397:11:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC) 1: 5389:to file an un-delete request. 5360:our policy for non-free media 5268:Thanks for the help with the 5178:articles gives an h of 23. -- 4789:Many thanks for your editing 2373:15:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 2358:14:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 2330:06:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 2310:23:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 2248:12:36, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 2220:10:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 2206:10:06, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 2188:09:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 2172:09:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 2135:06:20, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 2121:02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 2096:00:06, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 2057:16:17, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 2042:16:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 2015:15:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 1999:08:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 1971:other editors, as you did on 1951:07:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 1917:23:00, 6 September 2010 (UTC) 1871:15:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC) 1854:11:15, 6 September 2010 (UTC) 1822:15:53, 6 September 2010 (UTC) 1807:21:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC) 1785:15:32, 6 September 2010 (UTC) 1770:19:51, 5 September 2010 (UTC) 1740:16:52, 6 September 2010 (UTC) 1718:15:47, 6 September 2010 (UTC) 1695:06:16, 5 September 2010 (UTC) 1677:06:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC) 1662:17:04, 4 September 2010 (UTC) 1645:07:18, 4 September 2010 (UTC) 1627:06:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC) 1605:05:22, 4 September 2010 (UTC) 1582:00:55, 4 September 2010 (UTC) 1559:17:25, 4 September 2010 (UTC) 1517:20:11, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 1485:19:11, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 230:is fixed up, and the info in 5422:05:35, 7 November 2010 (UTC) 5287:01:02, 7 November 2010 (UTC) 5259:13:49, 6 November 2010 (UTC) 5245:13:23, 6 November 2010 (UTC) 5226:12:23, 6 November 2010 (UTC) 5188:16:55, 5 November 2010 (UTC) 5173:16:44, 5 November 2010 (UTC) 5159:05:29, 5 November 2010 (UTC) 5139:10:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 5122:10:13, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 5090:02:27, 4 November 2010 (UTC) 5051:16:11, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 5035:15:57, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 5006:11:38, 5 November 2010 (UTC) 4987:16:47, 1 November 2010 (UTC) 4972:16:42, 1 November 2010 (UTC) 4942:12:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 4926:12:20, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 4898:17:14, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 4874:15:14, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 4852:15:06, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 4818:08:35, 1 November 2010 (UTC) 4803:23:53, 31 October 2010 (UTC) 4777:07:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC) 4759:07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC) 4738:23:26, 27 October 2010 (UTC) 4712:08:42, 24 October 2010 (UTC) 4694:08:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC) 4679:08:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC) 4650:06:26, 24 October 2010 (UTC) 4631:06:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC) 4609:05:17, 20 October 2010 (UTC) 4586:01:08, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 4554:07:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 4538:22:03, 18 October 2010 (UTC) 4510:07:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 4487:22:03, 18 October 2010 (UTC) 4468:18:29, 18 October 2010 (UTC) 4449:17:44, 18 October 2010 (UTC) 4425:18:13, 18 October 2010 (UTC) 4406:08:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC) 4344:05:19, 17 October 2010 (UTC) 4316:21:19, 15 October 2010 (UTC) 4290:12:51, 15 October 2010 (UTC) 4238:15:20, 14 October 2010 (UTC) 4214:15:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC) 4178:12:36, 14 October 2010 (UTC) 4154:11:58, 14 October 2010 (UTC) 4057:06:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 4037:06:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 3999:17:59, 10 October 2010 (UTC) 3980:14:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC) 3964:14:40, 10 October 2010 (UTC) 3897:06:03, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 2450:And for Le Censeur européen 1495:Category:Philosophy journals 1223:; could you please explain? 5381:If you receive this notice 4910:appreciated. Many thanks. 4595:Maybe you could comment on 4186:Encyclopaedia Iranica is a 4159:The tone of the article in 3940:14:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC) 3925:14:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC) 3876:01:02, 5 October 2010 (UTC) 3850:17:39, 4 October 2010 (UTC) 3832:01:02, 5 October 2010 (UTC) 3812:09:27, 4 October 2010 (UTC) 3793:08:59, 4 October 2010 (UTC) 3777:02:12, 4 October 2010 (UTC) 3755:01:57, 4 October 2010 (UTC) 3731:18:04, 5 October 2010 (UTC) 3640:17:31, 4 October 2010 (UTC) 3469:13:04, 4 October 2010 (UTC) 3437:12:45, 4 October 2010 (UTC) 3422:12:33, 4 October 2010 (UTC) 3407:12:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC) 3387:15:22, 1 October 2010 (UTC) 3369:15:15, 1 October 2010 (UTC) 3351:The Recent changes Barnstar 3328:07:38, 1 October 2010 (UTC) 3313:07:04, 1 October 2010 (UTC) 2150:was not of much use, see:- 1372:21:00, 31 August 2010 (UTC) 1357:12:15, 31 August 2010 (UTC) 1300:11:31, 31 August 2010 (UTC) 1283:10:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC) 1252:22:07, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 1233:21:57, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 1205:07:58, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 1189:02:48, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 1174:00:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 1159:00:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 1144:23:57, 29 August 2010 (UTC) 1096:17:37, 27 August 2010 (UTC) 1082:17:36, 27 August 2010 (UTC) 1068:17:31, 27 August 2010 (UTC) 1049:17:23, 27 August 2010 (UTC) 1030:17:02, 27 August 2010 (UTC) 1014:15:57, 27 August 2010 (UTC) 984:00:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 966:15:02, 27 August 2010 (UTC) 939:08:34, 27 August 2010 (UTC) 909:05:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC) 890:05:36, 27 August 2010 (UTC) 868:04:21, 27 August 2010 (UTC) 853:04:15, 27 August 2010 (UTC) 738:08:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 704:02:04, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 678:03:14, 26 August 2010 (UTC) 658:07:57, 25 August 2010 (UTC) 606:06:57, 25 August 2010 (UTC) 569:06:11, 25 August 2010 (UTC) 546:05:52, 25 August 2010 (UTC) 496:03:37, 22 August 2010 (UTC) 479:03:12, 22 August 2010 (UTC) 464:03:09, 22 August 2010 (UTC) 427:14:27, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 413:01:13, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 398:18:56, 20 August 2010 (UTC) 388:think appropriate? Thanks. 366:14:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 342:18:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC) 317:18:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC) 292:18:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC) 265:18:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC) 244:23:24, 16 August 2010 (UTC) 215:12:43, 15 August 2010 (UTC) 189:04:46, 12 August 2010 (UTC) 161:00:09, 12 August 2010 (UTC) 5437: 4380:has a huge impact factor ( 4063:DYK for Minds and Machines 3173:Bulletin of Marine Science 2346:User:Guillaume2303/Autobio 949:materials science journals 518:time to run through them. 378:There has been an edit to 124:16:02, 9 August 2010 (UTC) 5249:Merci! My pleasure :-) -- 4960:Acta Philosophica Fennica 4791:Acta Philosophica Fennica 4784:Acta Philosophica Fennica 4524:By the way, Do you think 3347: 2636:No, I didn't, I took you 2079:Andrew Dingley's Talkpage 1400:comments if you like). 1924:Redirects for discussion 1893:Journal (disambiguation) 1812:Thanks and good luck! -- 1756:Nanotoxicology (journal) 442:. According to Worldcat 354:Journal Citation Reports 347:It's difficult to add a 172:Fungal Biology (journal) 5403:and leave a message on 4200:]. We strictly follow 4113:Did you know? talk page 4007:Q re journal notability 3866:seems worth including. 3704:Did you know? talk page 3654:DYK for James M. Cantor 2294: 1939:the redirect discussion 1838:Organisms and artifacts 1129:But I know the journal 872:OK, I just came across 769:musculo-skeletal system 109:Studies in Intelligence 18:User talk:Guillaume2303 5335: 5296: 5078: 4142:www.google.scholar.com 3221:wikipage. Please read 3156:T:TDYK#James M. Cantor 3108:Thanks for the note.-- 2749:separate publication. 2336:Silly question, but... 840:. Here is another one 5394:{{bots|deny=DASHBot}} 5340:Thanks for uploading 5333: 5295: 5199: 5149:to comment on it :-) 5060: 4303:page on the articles 4138:www.books.google.ccom 3459:. Hope this helps. -- 3294:You might like this; 3104:West Branch (journal) 2262:Hello Guillaume2303, 1420:The Editors describe 1329:a title without "the" 874:Category:Biomaterials 728:. Hope this helps! -- 717:secondary independent 234:is merged into it. -- 196:CAB Direct (database) 45:of past discussions. 5405:my owner's talk page 4880:Thanks for your help 4862:conflict of interest 4331:, and see this link 4161:Encyclopedia Iranica 3592:at this stage. ---- 2922:James Cantor article 2887:Philosophypsychiatry 2865:Philosophypsychiatry 2825:Philosophypsychiatry 2807:Philosophypsychiatry 2764:Philosophypsychiatry 2735:Philosophypsychiatry 2383:Dear Guillaume2303, 1726:Here's another one: 787:tricalcium phosphate 692:Philosophypsychiatry 670:Philosophypsychiatry 598:Philosophypsychiatry 538:Philosophypsychiatry 327:Journal of Infection 133:Take a look at this 5356:You may add it back 5270:Healthcare journals 3911:Arthur Rubin Delete 3864:Transgenic Research 3290:You might like this 3024:Dowden Health Media 3009:Dowden Health Media 2340:I presume you want 2146:from another admin 1543:bounded rationality 1530:A little follow-up. 813:heart valves."--- 803:periodontal disease 777:, may be bioinert ( 749:First, Sorry about 203:CAB Direct database 5396:to your talk page. 5343:File:JIVRcover.jpg 5336: 5306:! Cookies promote 5297: 4091:Minds and Machines 3885:Minds and Machines 3860:Stephen C. Stearns 3802:the difference? -- 3761:James Henry Fetzer 3737:Minds and Machines 3545:Talk:Insektenbörse 3146:Hi... the article 2515:University of Hull 2511:Kingston upon Hull 2408:". The article on 2030:Set a good example 1345:Ann. Pharmacother. 1110:Journal categories 974:I've started... -- 760:Acta Biomaterialia 744:Acta Biomaterialia 232:Independent review 221:Independent review 129:Volume 30 Number 1 5348:claim of fair use 5110:Kevin J. Sullivan 5105:Kevin J. Sullivan 4916:comment added by 4855: 4838:comment added by 4597:Talk:Adoption#RfC 4204:in wikipedia. -- 4119: 4118: 4106: 4029:Health Researcher 3991:Health Researcher 3956:Health Researcher 3710: 3709: 3697: 3374: 3373: 3367: 3286: 3269:comment added by 3213: 3196:comment added by 3088:comment added by 2902: 2885:comment added by 2438:Purple (magazine) 2406:academic journals 2236:#Uninvolved admin 1901:navigation popups 1489:Hi, some ansers: 795:bioactive glasses 707: 690:comment added by 340: 315: 290: 263: 106: 105: 57: 56: 51:current talk page 5428: 5395: 5338: 5284: 5279: 5276: 5209: 5075:Editor-in-Chief 4956:Berkeley Studies 4949:Berkeley Studies 4928: 4854: 4832: 4584: 4581: 4576: 4571: 4288: 4285: 4280: 4275: 4263: 4257: 4096: 4074: 4067: 3952:J. Harold Ellens 3765:computer science 3729: 3726: 3687: 3665: 3658: 3365: 3361: 3345: 3338: 3337: 3311: 3304: 3285: 3263: 3212: 3190: 3100: 3019: 2984: 2977: 2970:Nursing Standard 2964:Nursing Standard 2901: 2879: 2727:Shakuntala Singh 2442:Vogue (magazine) 2305: 2296: 2290: 2284: 2280: 2274: 2152:Requesting a ban 1966: 1911: 1908: 1341:J. Clin. Invest. 1275:Jodi.a.schneider 1225:Jodi.a.schneider 953:medical journals 832: 706: 684: 501:Shakuntala Singh 334: 309: 284: 257: 84: 59: 58: 36: 35: 29: 5436: 5435: 5431: 5430: 5429: 5427: 5426: 5425: 5393: 5327: 5326: 5321: 5282: 5277: 5274: 5266: 5233: 5205: 5202: 5103:I've nominated 5101: 5014: 4998:Solus ipse Inc. 4964:Solus ipse Inc. 4952: 4911: 4907: 4882: 4833: 4828: 4795:Solus ipse Inc. 4787: 4747:User:Kellwoodpr 4722: 4661:Kenneth Kendler 4658: 4616: 4593: 4579: 4574: 4569: 4565: 4562: 4522: 4437: 4390:Materials Today 4378:Materials Today 4352:Materials Today 4326:Materials Today 4323: 4321:Materials Today 4297: 4283: 4278: 4273: 4269: 4267: 4261: 4255: 4250: 4134: 4122:The DYK project 4079:12 October 2010 4065: 4009: 3948: 3913: 3740: 3724: 3712: 3682:James M. Cantor 3656: 3477: 3395: 3363: 3336: 3300: 3298: 3292: 3264: 3191: 3175: 3148:James M. Cantor 3144: 3125: 3106: 3083: 3080: 3070: 3061: 3032:deletion policy 3020: 3013: 2983: 2976:Kateshortforbob 2975: 2973: 2966: 2943: 2924: 2880: 2729: 2618: 2491: 2381: 2338: 2303: 2288: 2282: 2278: 2272: 2260: 2071: 1981:Might I remind 1960: 1927: 1909: 1906: 1881: 1830: 1793: 1758: 1567: 1385:Hello, Dr. C. 1383: 1325:its own example 1314: 1213: 1112: 1002: 814: 785:), resorbable ( 746: 685: 629:Albert Einstein 503: 437: 374: 332:Espresso Addict 307:Espresso Addict 282:Espresso Addict 270:PS, note while 255:Espresso Addict 251: 224: 199: 131: 111: 80: 33: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5434: 5432: 5411: 5409: 5408: 5397: 5390: 5379: 5376: 5325: 5322: 5290: 5265: 5262: 5232: 5229: 5211: 5210: 5201: 5198: 5197: 5196: 5195: 5194: 5193: 5192: 5191: 5190: 5142: 5141: 5100: 5094: 5093: 5092: 5076: 5074: 5072: 5071: 5069: 5068: 5067:Hello Michael, 5066: 5065: 5059: 5058: 5054: 5053: 5013: 5010: 5009: 5008: 4994:Broken English 4989: 4951: 4946: 4945: 4944: 4906: 4901: 4881: 4878: 4877: 4876: 4827: 4822: 4821: 4820: 4786: 4781: 4780: 4779: 4764: 4763: 4762: 4761: 4721: 4718: 4717: 4716: 4715: 4714: 4657: 4654: 4653: 4652: 4615: 4612: 4592: 4589: 4561: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4521: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4512: 4492: 4491: 4490: 4489: 4436: 4431: 4430: 4429: 4428: 4427: 4409: 4408: 4322: 4319: 4296: 4293: 4251: 4249: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4181: 4180: 4133: 4130: 4117: 4116: 4107:and add it to 4075: 4064: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4008: 4005: 4004: 4003: 4002: 4001: 3983: 3982: 3947: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3912: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3879: 3878: 3853: 3852: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3815: 3814: 3739: 3734: 3708: 3707: 3698:and add it to 3670:5 October 2010 3666: 3655: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3624: 3623: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3586: 3585: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3508: 3476: 3475:Insekten-Börse 3473: 3472: 3471: 3394: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3377:Thanks! :-) -- 3372: 3371: 3354: 3353: 3348: 3346: 3335: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3291: 3288: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3246: 3245: 3174: 3171: 3143: 3140: 3124: 3123:Article review 3121: 3105: 3102: 3079: 3076: 3068: 3060: 3057: 3014: 3012: 3007:Nomination of 3005: 3004: 3003: 2979: 2965: 2962: 2942: 2939: 2923: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2903: 2861: 2860: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2822: 2821: 2801: 2800: 2795: 2794: 2761: 2760: 2755: 2754: 2728: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2707:Bill the Cat 7 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2662:Bill the Cat 7 2654: 2653: 2623:Bill the Cat 7 2617: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2587: 2586: 2568: 2567: 2549: 2548: 2519:Richard Harvey 2503:86.164.157.197 2499:LarkinToad2010 2495:86.163.229.253 2490: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2429: 2428: 2380: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2337: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2259: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2240:Richard Harvey 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2191: 2190: 2164:Richard Harvey 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2088:Richard Harvey 2075:LarkinToad2010 2070: 2068:LarkinToad2010 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2018: 2017: 1980: 1959: 1954: 1926: 1920: 1897:WP:FIXDABLINKS 1880: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1829: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1792: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1775:Looks fine! -- 1757: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1721: 1720: 1698: 1697: 1680: 1679: 1648: 1647: 1630: 1629: 1608: 1607: 1566: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1539: 1536: 1532: 1531: 1528: 1520: 1519: 1505: 1501: 1498: 1469: 1468: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1418: 1414: 1413: 1382: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1337:J. Exper. Med. 1313: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1265: 1212: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1162: 1161: 1111: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1086:Wow, kudos! -- 1033: 1032: 1001: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 969: 968: 942: 941: 912: 911: 893: 892: 855: 834: 833: 799:glass-ceramics 791:hydroxyapatite 789:), bioactive ( 764: 763: 755: 754: 745: 742: 741: 740: 708: 667: 666: 661: 660: 645:Seymour Benzer 637:Dorret Boomsma 580: 579: 574: 572: 571: 502: 499: 436: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 419:— James Cantor 390:— James Cantor 377: 373: 370: 369: 368: 322: 321: 320: 319: 298: 273:Carcinogenesis 250: 249:Carcinogenesis 247: 223: 218: 198: 193: 192: 191: 130: 127: 110: 107: 104: 103: 98: 95: 90: 85: 78: 73: 68: 65: 55: 54: 37: 26: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5433: 5424: 5423: 5419: 5415: 5406: 5402: 5398: 5391: 5388: 5384: 5380: 5377: 5374: 5370: 5369: 5368: 5367: 5363: 5361: 5357: 5353: 5349: 5345: 5344: 5337: 5332: 5323: 5320: 5318: 5314: 5309: 5305: 5302: 5294: 5289: 5288: 5285: 5280: 5271: 5263: 5261: 5260: 5256: 5252: 5251:Guillaume2303 5247: 5246: 5242: 5238: 5230: 5228: 5227: 5223: 5219: 5215: 5208: 5204: 5203: 5189: 5185: 5181: 5180:Guillaume2303 5176: 5175: 5174: 5170: 5166: 5162: 5161: 5160: 5156: 5152: 5148: 5144: 5143: 5140: 5136: 5132: 5131:Guillaume2303 5128: 5127: 5126: 5125: 5124: 5123: 5119: 5115: 5111: 5106: 5099: 5095: 5091: 5087: 5083: 5080: 5079: 5077: 5073:Grace Lindsay 5064: 5056: 5055: 5052: 5048: 5044: 5043:Guillaume2303 5039: 5038: 5037: 5036: 5032: 5028: 5022: 5018: 5011: 5007: 5003: 4999: 4995: 4990: 4988: 4984: 4980: 4979:Guillaume2303 4976: 4975: 4974: 4973: 4969: 4965: 4961: 4957: 4950: 4947: 4943: 4939: 4935: 4934:Guillaume2303 4931: 4930: 4929: 4927: 4923: 4919: 4918:82.153.51.131 4915: 4905: 4902: 4900: 4899: 4895: 4891: 4887: 4886:Chuck Liddell 4879: 4875: 4871: 4867: 4866:Guillaume2303 4863: 4858: 4857: 4856: 4853: 4849: 4845: 4841: 4837: 4826: 4823: 4819: 4815: 4811: 4810:Guillaume2303 4807: 4806: 4805: 4804: 4800: 4796: 4792: 4785: 4782: 4778: 4774: 4770: 4766: 4765: 4760: 4756: 4752: 4751:Guillaume2303 4748: 4744: 4743: 4742: 4741: 4740: 4739: 4735: 4731: 4727: 4719: 4713: 4709: 4705: 4701: 4698:He's even in 4697: 4696: 4695: 4691: 4687: 4686:Guillaume2303 4683: 4682: 4681: 4680: 4676: 4672: 4669: 4666: 4662: 4655: 4651: 4647: 4643: 4642:Guillaume2303 4639: 4635: 4634: 4633: 4632: 4628: 4624: 4620: 4619:PsycCRITIQUES 4614:PsycCRITIQUES 4613: 4611: 4610: 4606: 4602: 4598: 4590: 4588: 4587: 4583: 4582: 4577: 4572: 4559: 4555: 4551: 4547: 4546:Guillaume2303 4542: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4535: 4531: 4527: 4519: 4511: 4507: 4503: 4502:Guillaume2303 4498: 4497: 4496: 4495: 4494: 4493: 4488: 4484: 4480: 4476: 4471: 4470: 4469: 4465: 4461: 4460:Guillaume2303 4457: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4446: 4442: 4435: 4432: 4426: 4422: 4418: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4407: 4403: 4399: 4398:Guillaume2303 4395: 4391: 4387: 4386:The Scientist 4383: 4382:The Scientist 4379: 4375: 4374: 4373:The Scientist 4369: 4365: 4364: 4359: 4358: 4353: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4341: 4337: 4333: 4330: 4327: 4320: 4318: 4317: 4313: 4309: 4306: 4302: 4294: 4292: 4291: 4287: 4286: 4281: 4276: 4266: 4264: 4258: 4247: 4239: 4235: 4231: 4230:Guillaume2303 4227: 4226: 4221: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4211: 4207: 4206:Khodabandeh14 4203: 4199: 4196: 4193: 4189: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4179: 4175: 4171: 4170:Guillaume2303 4167: 4162: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4151: 4147: 4146:Khodabandeh14 4143: 4139: 4131: 4129: 4127: 4123: 4114: 4110: 4104: 4100: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4086: 4085: 4084:Did you know? 4080: 4076: 4073: 4069: 4068: 4062: 4058: 4054: 4050: 4049:Guillaume2303 4046: 4041: 4040: 4039: 4038: 4034: 4030: 4026: 4022: 4018: 4014: 4006: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3981: 3977: 3973: 3972:Guillaume2303 3968: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3953: 3945: 3941: 3937: 3933: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3922: 3918: 3910: 3898: 3894: 3890: 3889:Guillaume2303 3886: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3877: 3873: 3869: 3865: 3861: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3851: 3847: 3843: 3839: 3838: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3804:Guillaume2303 3801: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3790: 3786: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3774: 3770: 3766: 3762: 3757: 3756: 3752: 3748: 3744: 3738: 3735: 3733: 3732: 3727: 3721: 3720: 3718: 3705: 3701: 3695: 3691: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3677: 3676: 3675:Did you know? 3671: 3667: 3664: 3660: 3659: 3653: 3641: 3637: 3633: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3622: 3618: 3614: 3613:Guillaume2303 3609: 3608: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3575:Guillaume2303 3572: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3521: 3517: 3512: 3509: 3507: 3503: 3499: 3498:Guillaume2303 3494: 3493: 3492: 3491: 3487: 3483: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3461:Guillaume2303 3458: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3424: 3423: 3419: 3415: 3409: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3380: 3379:Guillaume2303 3376: 3375: 3370: 3366: 3360: 3356: 3355: 3352: 3349: 3344: 3339: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3320:Guillaume2303 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3309: 3305: 3303: 3297: 3289: 3287: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3260: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3235:Guillaume2303 3232: 3228: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3199: 3195: 3187: 3184: 3181: 3178: 3172: 3170: 3169: 3165: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3141: 3139: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3122: 3120: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3103: 3101: 3099: 3095: 3091: 3090:86.160.76.224 3087: 3077: 3075: 3074: 3071: 3066: 3058: 3056: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3042: 3040: 3035: 3033: 3029: 3025: 3018: 3010: 3006: 3002: 2998: 2994: 2993:Guillaume2303 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2982: 2978: 2971: 2963: 2961: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2940: 2938: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2909: 2908:Guillaume2303 2904: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2858: 2857: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2843:Guillaume2303 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2797: 2796: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2784:Guillaume2303 2781: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2757: 2756: 2752: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2726: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2681:Guillaume2303 2678: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2643:Guillaume2303 2639: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2615: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2594:Guillaume2303 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2538:Guillaume2303 2534: 2533: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2507:86.166.65.234 2504: 2500: 2496: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2475:Guillaume2303 2471: 2470: 2469: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2454: 2453: 2448: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2418:Guillaume2303 2415: 2411: 2407: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2384: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2365:Guillaume2303 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2356: 2355: 2352: 2347: 2343: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2322:Guillaume2303 2319: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2308: 2306: 2300: 2292: 2287: 2277: 2271:article with 2270: 2269: 2263: 2257: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2212:Guillaume2303 2209: 2208: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2180:Guillaume2303 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2127:Guillaume2303 2124: 2123: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2105: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2069: 2066: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2049:Guillaume2303 2045: 2044: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2026: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1965: 1958: 1955: 1953: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1925: 1921: 1919: 1918: 1915: 1913: 1912: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1883:Hi, now that 1879: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1863:Guillaume2303 1859: 1858: 1857: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1814:Guillaume2303 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1799: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1777:Guillaume2303 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1755: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1732:Guillaume2303 1729: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1710:Guillaume2303 1707: 1706: 1700: 1699: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1654:Jimsteele9999 1650: 1649: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1619:Guillaume2303 1616: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1597:Guillaume2303 1594: 1590: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1574:Jimsteele9999 1571: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1537: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1526: 1522: 1521: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1509:Guillaume2303 1506: 1502: 1499: 1496: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1487: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1439:)" after the 1438: 1434: 1433: 1426: 1425: 1423: 1419: 1416: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1386: 1380: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1321: 1319: 1311: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1292:Guillaume2303 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1271: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1257: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1244:Guillaume2303 1241: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1197:Guillaume2303 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1176: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1151:Guillaume2303 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1132: 1127: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1109: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1088:Guillaume2303 1085: 1084: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1060:Guillaume2303 1057: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1022:Guillaume2303 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1011: 1007: 999: 985: 981: 977: 976:Guillaume2303 973: 972: 971: 970: 967: 963: 959: 954: 950: 946: 945: 944: 943: 940: 936: 932: 931:Guillaume2303 928: 924: 920: 916: 915: 914: 913: 910: 906: 902: 897: 896: 895: 894: 891: 887: 883: 879: 875: 871: 870: 869: 865: 861: 860:Guillaume2303 856: 854: 850: 846: 842: 839: 836: 835: 830: 826: 822: 818: 812: 808: 807:spinal fusion 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 776: 775: 770: 766: 765: 761: 757: 756: 752: 751:"(see coden)" 748: 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 730:Guillaume2303 727: 723: 718: 714: 709: 705: 701: 697: 693: 689: 682: 681: 680: 679: 675: 671: 663: 662: 659: 655: 651: 650:Guillaume2303 646: 642: 641:John L. Jinks 638: 634: 633:Francis Crick 630: 626: 622: 618: 614: 610: 609: 608: 607: 603: 599: 595: 592: 588: 584: 577: 576: 575: 570: 566: 562: 561:Guillaume2303 558: 554: 550: 549: 548: 547: 543: 539: 535: 532: 528: 525: 522: 519: 515: 512: 509: 506: 500: 498: 497: 493: 489: 485: 481: 480: 476: 472: 466: 465: 461: 457: 453: 450: 447: 444: 441: 434: 428: 424: 420: 416: 415: 414: 410: 406: 405:Guillaume2303 402: 401: 400: 399: 395: 391: 386: 384: 381: 371: 367: 363: 359: 358:Guillaume2303 355: 350: 346: 345: 344: 343: 338: 333: 329: 328: 318: 313: 308: 303: 299: 295: 294: 293: 288: 283: 279: 275: 274: 269: 268: 267: 266: 261: 256: 248: 246: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 222: 219: 217: 216: 212: 208: 204: 197: 194: 190: 186: 182: 181:Guillaume2303 177: 173: 169: 165: 164: 163: 162: 158: 154: 149: 145: 141: 138: 135: 128: 126: 125: 121: 117: 108: 102: 99: 96: 94: 91: 89: 86: 83: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 66: 64: 61: 60: 52: 48: 44: 43: 38: 31: 30: 27: 19: 5412:Thank you. 5410: 5382: 5366:PLEASE NOTE: 5365: 5364: 5341: 5339: 5328: 5313:subst:Cookie 5298: 5267: 5248: 5234: 5213: 5212: 5146: 5102: 5061: 5023: 5019: 5015: 4953: 4908: 4883: 4829: 4788: 4723: 4659: 4617: 4594: 4566: 4563: 4526:Michael Lamb 4523: 4520:Michael Lamb 4438: 4393: 4389: 4385: 4381: 4377: 4371: 4361: 4355: 4351: 4324: 4298: 4270: 4268: 4256:new messages 4253: 4223: 4166:Jalal Matini 4160: 4135: 4120: 4089: 4088: 4082: 4012: 4010: 3949: 3914: 3884: 3799: 3758: 3741: 3716: 3715: 3711: 3680: 3679: 3673: 3478: 3451: 3425: 3410: 3396: 3350: 3301: 3293: 3261: 3257: 3218: 3188: 3185: 3182: 3179: 3176: 3145: 3126: 3107: 3081: 3065:Plastikspork 3062: 3043: 3036: 3021: 3011:for deletion 2967: 2944: 2925: 2862: 2823: 2805: 2802: 2762: 2733: 2730: 2637: 2619: 2492: 2489:User Welcome 2455: 2449: 2430: 2413: 2385: 2382: 2353: 2350: 2339: 2297: 2293: 2266: 2264: 2261: 2198:Andy Dingley 2141: 2072: 2029: 2024: 1991:Andy Dingley 1982: 1977:welcome page 1961: 1934: 1928: 1905: 1882: 1841: 1837: 1831: 1796: 1794: 1759: 1703: 1614: 1568: 1546: 1524: 1488: 1472: 1470: 1464: 1456: 1448: 1436: 1424:as follows: 1421: 1397: 1393: 1387: 1384: 1378: 1333:J. Gerontol. 1324: 1322: 1315: 1239: 1214: 1177: 1163: 1130: 1128: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1113: 1003: 952: 948: 922: 918: 820: 816: 773: 772: 759: 750: 668: 596: 593: 589: 585: 581: 573: 557:it's subject 556: 552: 536: 533: 529: 526: 523: 520: 516: 513: 510: 507: 504: 482: 467: 438: 375: 348: 325: 323: 301: 277: 271: 252: 225: 200: 175: 146:, and here: 132: 112: 81: 46: 40: 25: 5317:subst:munch 5098:WP:ACADEMIC 4912:—Preceding 4890:TucsonDavid 4834:—Preceding 4434:Steven Rose 4417:Steve Quinn 4336:Steve Quinn 4262:last change 4225:Iranshenazi 4103:quick check 3932:Ian.thomson 3842:Steve Quinn 3785:Steve Quinn 3694:quick check 3632:Steve Quinn 3594:Steve Quinn 3549:Steve Quinn 3531:Steve Quinn 3359:LeadSongDog 3265:—Preceding 3192:—Preceding 3129:Steve Quinn 3084:—Preceding 2951:Steve Quinn 2881:—Preceding 2616:Notability? 2576:Steve Quinn 2557:Steve Quinn 2299:D. Trebbien 2113:Steve Quinn 1762:Steve Quinn 1687:Steve Quinn 1669:Steve Quinn 1637:Steve Quinn 1551:Thomasmeeks 1477:Thomasmeeks 1398:italicized 1179:journals.-- 958:Steve Quinn 901:Steve Quinn 882:Steve Quinn 845:Steve Quinn 774:bioceramics 686:—Preceding 488:Steve Quinn 471:Steve Quinn 456:Steve Quinn 228:Peer review 153:Steve Quinn 136:, and this 116:Steve Quinn 39:This is an 5275:jsfouche 4769:Epeefleche 4730:Epeefleche 4308:The Eskimo 4305:talk page. 4228:to AfD. -- 4099:here's how 4047:... :-) -- 4045:WP:CRYSTAL 3946:Thanks + Q 3917:Euro-Voice 3690:here's how 3364:come howl! 3252:location). 3046:MrCleanOut 2941:ANI thread 2517:articles. 2434:L'Officiel 2414:Le Censeur 2379:Le Censeur 2144:Tide Rolls 2034:Mike Cline 2007:Mike Cline 2005:applies.-- 1985:of you of 1842:references 1615:everything 1475:first. -- 1459:button at 1451:)" was to 1318:being bold 1074:Tryptofish 1041:Tryptofish 1006:Tryptofish 811:prosthetic 101:Archive 10 5231:thank you 5082:CrazyPaco 5027:CrazyPaco 4700:this book 4301:Larkin 25 4295:Larkin 25 4252:You have 3429:Jlukewood 3414:Jlukewood 3399:Jlukewood 3308:reasoning 3302:Abductive 3271:Shidelerg 3262:Thanks. 3198:Shidelerg 3110:GrapedApe 2751:This tool 2083:Larkin 25 1973:Larkin 25 1957:Larkin 25 1828:World Cat 1791:cambridge 1181:Srleffler 771:, termed 625:WP:MOSBIO 302:published 93:Archive 7 88:Archive 6 82:Archive 5 76:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 63:Archive 1 5352:orphaned 5308:WikiLove 5237:Viking59 5214:applause 5200:'eckling 5165:Tijfo098 4914:unsigned 4848:contribs 4836:unsigned 4720:Question 4704:Tijfo098 4671:Tijfo098 4623:Tijfo098 4601:Tijfo098 4591:Adoption 4530:Tijfo098 4479:Tijfo098 4456:User:DGG 4441:Tijfo098 4248:Talkback 4126:nominate 4109:DYKSTATS 4025:PsycInfo 3868:Tijfo098 3862:. Also, 3824:Tijfo098 3769:Tijfo098 3747:Tijfo098 3700:DYKSTATS 3279:contribs 3267:unsigned 3206:contribs 3194:unsigned 3086:unsigned 2895:contribs 2883:unsigned 2780:User:DGG 2156:talkpage 1943:Muhandes 1118:and the 823:: 1487. 783:zirconia 700:contribs 688:unsigned 278:in vitro 236:Uncle Ed 5414:DASHBot 5371:I am a 5264:Thanks! 5218:Uncle G 5147:h-index 4394:Science 4363:Science 3516:Notafly 3482:Notafly 3452:quality 3028:deleted 2928:Flyer22 2759:Thanks. 2458:Msrasnw 2410:journal 2389:Msrasnw 2318:journal 2276:cleanup 2148:Keith D 1885:Journal 1878:Journal 1846:Msrasnw 1565:journal 1394:italics 1364:Circéus 1349:Circéus 1240:journal 1164:Thanks. 779:alumina 713:peacock 617:WP:NPOV 553:article 176:started 142:--: --> 42:archive 5151:Ipsign 5114:Ipsign 4357:Nature 3457:WP:COI 3448:WP:GNG 3227:WP:COI 3223:WP:OWN 3160:EdChem 3078:Larkin 2677:WP:GNG 2286:wikify 2109:WP:NPA 2104:WP:OWN 2025:Always 1987:WP:NPA 1969:attack 1652:why... 1589:WP:GNG 1327:is at 1166:Iss246 1136:Iss246 1134:think. 1058:... -- 951:under 797:, and 621:WP:MOS 555:, not 349:direct 207:JohnCD 143:here: 5383:after 5304:ookie 5062:from 4640:). -- 4575:COMMS 4570:ƒETCH 4279:COMMS 4274:ƒETCH 4202:WP:RS 4192:WP:RS 4188:WP:RS 3719:levse 3514:find. 3334:Bling 3231:WP:RS 2949:---- 1803:talk 1461:60-67 1453:nudge 1445:60-67 1381:edits 880:---- 665:done. 643:, or 613:WP:RS 16:< 5418:talk 5401:here 5387:here 5319:}}! 5283:talk 5255:talk 5241:talk 5222:talk 5207:edit 5184:talk 5169:talk 5155:talk 5135:talk 5118:talk 5086:talk 5047:talk 5031:talk 5002:talk 4983:talk 4968:talk 4938:talk 4922:talk 4894:talk 4870:talk 4864:. -- 4844:talk 4840:GR60 4814:talk 4799:talk 4773:talk 4755:talk 4734:talk 4726:here 4708:talk 4690:talk 4675:talk 4646:talk 4627:talk 4605:talk 4560:INRA 4550:talk 4534:talk 4506:talk 4483:talk 4475:here 4464:talk 4458:? -- 4445:talk 4421:talk 4402:talk 4368:Here 4360:and 4340:talk 4312:talk 4234:talk 4220:here 4210:talk 4174:talk 4150:talk 4140:and 4136:Use 4053:talk 4033:talk 4017:HERE 3995:talk 3976:talk 3960:talk 3936:talk 3921:talk 3893:talk 3872:talk 3846:talk 3828:talk 3808:talk 3789:talk 3773:talk 3751:talk 3725:Talk 3636:talk 3617:talk 3598:talk 3579:talk 3553:talk 3535:talk 3520:talk 3502:talk 3486:talk 3465:talk 3433:talk 3418:talk 3403:talk 3383:talk 3324:talk 3275:talk 3239:talk 3219:your 3202:talk 3164:talk 3133:talk 3114:talk 3094:talk 3050:talk 2997:talk 2981:talk 2955:talk 2932:talk 2912:talk 2891:talk 2869:talk 2847:talk 2829:talk 2811:talk 2788:talk 2768:talk 2739:talk 2711:talk 2685:talk 2666:talk 2647:talk 2627:talk 2598:talk 2580:talk 2561:talk 2542:talk 2523:talk 2513:and 2505:and 2479:talk 2462:talk 2440:and 2422:talk 2393:talk 2369:talk 2351:TFOW 2326:talk 2304:talk 2281:and 2244:talk 2216:talk 2202:talk 2184:talk 2168:talk 2160:Here 2131:talk 2117:talk 2092:talk 2053:talk 2038:talk 2011:talk 1995:talk 1983:both 1947:talk 1867:talk 1850:talk 1818:talk 1781:talk 1766:talk 1736:talk 1730:. -- 1714:talk 1708:. -- 1691:talk 1673:talk 1658:talk 1641:talk 1623:talk 1601:talk 1578:talk 1555:talk 1513:talk 1481:talk 1443:pp. 1368:talk 1353:talk 1312:Move 1296:talk 1279:talk 1248:talk 1229:talk 1221:this 1201:talk 1185:talk 1170:talk 1155:talk 1140:talk 1092:talk 1078:talk 1064:talk 1045:talk 1026:talk 1010:talk 980:talk 962:talk 935:talk 905:talk 899:---- 886:talk 864:talk 849:talk 734:talk 724:and 696:talk 674:talk 654:talk 631:and 623:and 615:and 602:talk 565:talk 542:talk 492:talk 475:talk 460:talk 423:talk 409:talk 394:talk 362:talk 337:talk 324:Re: 312:talk 287:talk 260:talk 240:talk 211:talk 185:talk 170:and 157:talk 120:talk 114:---- 5373:bot 5362:). 5012:PUR 4077:On 3668:On 3446:or 3152:DYK 3142:DYK 2638:out 2348:). 1798:DGG 1525:CPE 1473:CPE 1422:CPE 1408:at 1000:Hi! 825:doi 5420:) 5311:{{ 5278:☽☾ 5257:) 5243:) 5224:) 5216:. 5186:) 5171:) 5157:) 5137:) 5120:) 5088:) 5049:) 5033:) 5004:) 4985:) 4970:) 4940:) 4924:) 4896:) 4872:) 4850:) 4846:• 4816:) 4801:) 4775:) 4757:) 4736:) 4710:) 4702:. 4692:) 4677:) 4663:: 4648:) 4629:) 4607:) 4552:) 4536:) 4508:) 4500:-- 4485:) 4466:) 4447:) 4423:) 4404:) 4388:, 4342:) 4314:) 4265:). 4236:) 4212:) 4176:) 4152:) 4101:, 4081:, 4055:) 4035:) 3997:) 3978:) 3962:) 3938:) 3923:) 3895:) 3874:) 3848:) 3830:) 3810:) 3800:is 3791:) 3775:) 3753:) 3728:• 3722:• 3713:— 3692:, 3672:, 3638:) 3619:) 3611:-- 3600:) 3581:) 3555:) 3537:) 3522:) 3504:) 3496:-- 3488:) 3467:) 3435:) 3420:) 3405:) 3385:) 3326:) 3281:) 3277:• 3241:) 3208:) 3204:• 3166:) 3135:) 3116:) 3096:) 3069:―Œ 3052:) 3034:. 2999:) 2957:) 2934:) 2914:) 2906:-- 2897:) 2893:• 2871:) 2849:) 2841:-- 2831:) 2813:) 2790:) 2770:) 2741:) 2713:) 2687:) 2668:) 2649:) 2641:-- 2629:) 2600:) 2582:) 2563:) 2544:) 2525:) 2481:) 2468:) 2464:) 2436:, 2424:) 2399:) 2395:) 2371:) 2328:) 2289:}} 2283:{{ 2279:}} 2273:{{ 2246:) 2238:. 2218:) 2204:) 2186:) 2178:-- 2170:) 2133:) 2119:) 2094:) 2055:) 2040:) 2013:) 1997:) 1949:) 1910:Ga 1907:Ja 1869:) 1856:) 1852:) 1820:) 1805:) 1783:) 1768:) 1738:) 1716:) 1693:) 1675:) 1660:) 1643:) 1625:) 1603:) 1580:) 1557:) 1515:) 1483:) 1370:) 1355:) 1343:, 1339:, 1335:, 1320:? 1298:) 1290:-- 1281:) 1250:) 1231:) 1203:) 1195:-- 1187:) 1172:) 1157:) 1142:) 1094:) 1080:) 1066:) 1047:) 1039:-- 1028:) 1012:) 982:) 964:) 937:) 925:a 923:is 919:do 907:) 888:) 866:) 851:) 821:74 819:. 793:, 781:, 736:) 702:) 698:• 676:) 656:) 639:, 604:) 567:) 544:) 494:) 477:) 462:) 448:, 425:) 411:) 396:) 364:) 242:) 213:) 187:) 159:) 122:) 97:→ 67:← 5416:( 5407:. 5334:⚠ 5301:c 5253:( 5239:( 5220:( 5182:( 5167:( 5153:( 5133:( 5116:( 5084:( 5045:( 5029:( 5000:( 4981:( 4966:( 4936:( 4920:( 4892:( 4868:( 4842:( 4812:( 4797:( 4771:( 4753:( 4732:( 4706:( 4688:( 4673:( 4644:( 4625:( 4603:( 4580:/ 4567:/ 4548:( 4532:( 4504:( 4481:( 4462:( 4443:( 4419:( 4400:( 4338:( 4310:( 4284:/ 4271:/ 4259:( 4232:( 4208:( 4172:( 4148:( 4124:( 4115:. 4105:) 4097:( 4051:( 4031:( 3993:( 3974:( 3958:( 3934:( 3919:( 3891:( 3870:( 3844:( 3826:( 3806:( 3787:( 3771:( 3749:( 3717:R 3706:. 3696:) 3688:( 3634:( 3615:( 3596:( 3577:( 3551:( 3533:( 3518:( 3500:( 3484:( 3463:( 3431:( 3416:( 3401:( 3381:( 3322:( 3310:) 3306:( 3273:( 3237:( 3200:( 3162:( 3131:( 3112:( 3092:( 3048:( 2995:( 2953:( 2930:( 2910:( 2889:( 2867:( 2845:( 2827:( 2809:( 2786:( 2766:( 2737:( 2709:( 2683:( 2664:( 2645:( 2625:( 2596:( 2578:( 2559:( 2540:( 2521:( 2477:( 2460:( 2420:( 2404:" 2391:( 2387:( 2367:( 2354:R 2324:( 2307:) 2301:( 2295:« 2242:( 2214:( 2200:( 2182:( 2166:( 2129:( 2115:( 2090:( 2051:( 2036:( 2009:( 1993:( 1945:( 1865:( 1848:( 1816:( 1801:( 1779:( 1764:( 1734:( 1712:( 1689:( 1671:( 1656:( 1639:( 1621:( 1599:( 1576:( 1553:( 1547:+ 1511:( 1479:( 1465:+ 1457:+ 1449:+ 1437:+ 1366:( 1351:( 1294:( 1277:( 1264:) 1246:( 1227:( 1199:( 1183:( 1168:( 1153:( 1138:( 1090:( 1076:( 1062:( 1043:( 1024:( 1008:( 978:( 960:( 933:( 903:( 884:( 862:( 847:( 831:. 827:: 732:( 694:( 672:( 652:( 600:( 563:( 540:( 490:( 473:( 458:( 421:( 407:( 392:( 360:( 352:" 339:) 335:( 314:) 310:( 289:) 285:( 262:) 258:( 238:( 209:( 183:( 155:( 118:( 53:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.