User talk:Hamsterlopithecus

704:: I did not say that the article needed to be complete. I said that it needed to have more content than it did. The article was not deleted "5 mins since its creation". The article was deleted 25 minutes after you created the article and 15 minutes after it was tagged for deletion. If you want me to restore the article and put it into your user space, I will do that. However, in my opinion, the article as it stood when it was deleted is not sufficient enough for it to remain in the main article space without additional work. -- 1403: 4400: 4352: 4304: 4256: 4208: 4070: 4022: 3974: 3926: 3878: 3830: 3782: 3734: 3686: 3604: 3556: 3508: 3460: 3412: 3364: 3316: 3268: 3220: 3172: 3124: 3076: 3028: 2980: 2932: 2887: 2859: 2806: 2753: 4122: 2591: 2452: 2082: 123:. Rock fragments CAN be igneous, but lithic fragments are ONLY volcanic. By definition, a plutonic rock fragment is NOT a volcanic lithic fragment, therefore using volcanic instead of igneous is more helpful and specific. Also, adding VRF, etc. does not apply, because that stands for Volcanic ROCK FRAGMENT, and does not apply to a page on lithic fragments. If you are unclear on this distinction, see 1112: 372: 564: 1282: 443: 3656: 671:. You are welcome to recreate the article, but you will need to add in more content than what you started with. If you are going to work on the article over a few days, you might want to start with a draft in your user space and then move the article once you are done so that it not deleted or tagged while you are working on it. -- 301:

Hi Hamsterlopithecus, I reverted your removal of the Contourite book ref as it was being used throughout the article. If you click on the link, that takes you into the book, but for some reason jumps to a page that it can't show. Just click on the other occurrences of the search term and you will see

974:

This cowardly thing you have done, and all the mess you made, will come back to haunt you. You will not be allowed to just forget it. The more you deny, the greater your lies become your identity. We will always be able to easily prove you are an unrepentant liar who unjustly smeared another editor.

615:

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should

1886:

Hello Hamsterlopithecus This editor has posted an RS about Cosby's civil rights documentary that is being removed from the article 'talk page' so other persons can not decide the significance to the wiki article. Also you will find a reply to a fellow editor who has essentially convicted Cosby with

1006:

of creating unnecessary drama on wikipedia and generally upsetting other decent editors. You've been banned from pages before and have been warned many times about your behavior. You are a problematic editor. I will not engage. If you keep trying to bring your bickering to this page, I will ban you

947:

All you want to do is argue for the sake of arguing without regard for the Knowledge project. As I clearly stated in your talk page (and other unrelated editors in the past seem to think the same), you like making threats and personally attacking other editors to win your battles. The relevant data

388:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original

317:

Mikenorton, I am going to be editing the contourite article pretty heavily. With your permission, I will remove your source for the "Contourites" book and add my own. If you disagree with the definition, we can discuss the issue here or in the article's discussion page. I will truly appreciate your

1311:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

486:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be

626:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can

497:

73:

I like the fact that you came over to express an excellent view on the beret article. It really is a fount of information, and I love it, but its organisation is BAAAAD!! True, too, that the military section ought to be somehow separated or branched off, or whatever the devil they call it here.

1249:

Material in this publication may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, educational, or personal research purposes; however, this source should be appropriately acknowledged. Core samples and the wider set of data from the science program covered in this report are under

1890:

This is an appeal for a more objective editor to intervene and let other editors judge the merits (if any) of the posted RS. You may have to check the history as it have been removed again but the RS is from UPI reporter Robert Musel at the time of the broadcast, there are many others. The

332:

No problem, I just wanted to be sure that you realised that the book was used elsewhere in the article. The article could certainly do with expansion. I'll hold off and make any comments after you're finished. What this (and many other articles) need is some images, I've looked at a lot of

2464:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2603:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

920:

That's not how it works. You made a claim. You must prove it. I have already proven that you are wrong. When you are lost, running faster doesn't help you. Stop and read my evidence. Then examine the claim you have made against me. You MUST prove it. I will get you blocked if you

4464:- if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so: 4509:

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

970:

Since you won't make things right, I will proceed to strike all your lies as violations of BLP. Needless to say, I will keep an eye on you, and if you goof up again, I will seek to have you banned. You have wasted a lot of time better used on constructive editing.

901:

I am not going to argue with you. You edit people's comments and change talk pages to make your point. And then you lie about it when you are called out. You are only interested in winning your arguments instead of improving wikipedia. You're not a helpful editor.

4457:

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.

4513:

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

538:

I added that it is traded on the NYSE, which is a claim to possible importance; it wll not be speedy deleted. But it will probably be deleted in our regular way, unless you add some 3rd party references to meet WP:ORG. I'd advise you to do this immediately

2094:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

857:, you keep repeating a false claim, so I'm going to assume you don't know how the timestamps with the comments and the page history show your version to be false. Let's get specific. You keep repeating the following false claim in various places: 1168:

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

475:, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 749:

It's been nearly a month and the point you added remains unsourced, whilst nobody else has contributed to the talk page discussion. I invite you to open a wider discussion to obtain some clear consensus on this issue once and for all.

628: 499: 1205:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in

604:. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Knowledge. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 635:

the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the

1887:

comments like 'a mountain of evidence' when no evidence has been tested by a court of law or history. They just seem to accept guilt and then run on comments about "Hitler'.The reply to this editor has been removed.

1072:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 4165: 2631: 2492: 2122: 1025:

Don't try to change the subject and make this about me. This is about your false claims. I have provided only one above. Just prove it's true. I suspect you are deflecting because you can't do it. --

4149:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2615:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2476:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2106:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 967:

No, I want to clear my name. You have repeatedly lied about me. That's wrong and you must fix this injustice. Your refusal is cowardly and shows you have no integrity. You are not an honest person.

594:. First, thank you for your contribution; Knowledge relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - 208:

If possible consider re-uploading the image under a different more unique name, and asking an experienced contributor or administrator to restore the image that was accidentally uploaded over.

730:

about the diagram that you created. Any chance you could edit the QFR triangle by adding 50 to the base, to show that it's only the upper half of the plot? Thanks and seasonal greetings,

4135: 275:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge. 3789: 640:

and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Knowledge looks forward to your future contributions.

3664: 2904:

You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by

2849:

You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by

2796:

You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by

2743:

You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by

156: 1124:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. 302:

the various supporting statements. I should probably try to update the citation with different pages for each one - I'll try tomorrow but right now I'm off to bed.

948:

is in the history, I just checked. I am not here to fight and you shouldn't either. I will no longer reply to you unless it's about improving a Knowledge article.

409:

to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Knowledge. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a

151:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

2669: 2658: 2563: 2552: 1416: 2939: 2839: 1300:(all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Knowledge (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated. 1136: 3563: 2325: 2314: 2226: 2215: 1308: 1289: 1275: 1195: 769: 205:

However, it seems that a recent upload of yours, has been uploaded over an existing image, It is appreciated that this was seemingly done accidentally.

1460: 824: 347:

I have finished editing the article for now. I might add a bit more eventually. Let's talk in the article's discussion about revisions and additions.

3885: 773: 21: 2358: 2347: 1127:

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

1120: 814: 3275: 1762: 1751: 1271: 1215: 786:

Over a month since I left the above message. Have you given any thought about starting a wider discussion to fully clarify this issue? Thanks.

432: 182:

and then add that to the picture if you like. That would solve the problem. But there are other ways. Do you know when this badge was adopted?

1456: 820: 396:

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a

810: 4188: 3179: 3131: 2645: 2506: 2136: 1630: 1619: 1097: 389:

copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the

223:

Oh I'm so sorry! I have reuploaded the file as File:RobertFolk in Italy7.jpg. Could you help me revert the file File:Folk.jpg? Thank you!

4538: 3083: 1892: 1376: 1365: 1223: 1150:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 924:

Keep in mind that BLP applies to all living persons, including editors. Blatant lies are a violation of BLP and a blockable offense. --

776:

could be plausible forms for you to raise your concerns. I really don't care what the result is, as long as there is a result. Regards.

414: 279: 3648: 2698: 2665: 2559: 2526: 2420: 2387: 2354: 2321: 2288: 2255: 2222: 2189: 2156: 2047: 2014: 1985: 1981: 1974: 1948: 1915: 1857: 1824: 1791: 1758: 1725: 1692: 1659: 1626: 1593: 1560: 1527: 1494: 1372: 1339: 268: 75: 4263: 397: 3933: 765: 4184: 2641: 2502: 2193: 2182: 2132: 1093: 761: 148: 817:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1453:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 264: 2160: 2149: 1199: 1191: 1244:, the files I uploaded are all from a report that contains the following statement from the author(s) on the second page: 768:" and I've just told him basically the same thing as you, so you may want to talk to him before starting any discussion. 4158: 4029: 2624: 2485: 2115: 573: 452: 1084:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

4170: 3611: 2636: 2497: 2127: 1409: 1402: 1089: 663:: The article was deleted because at the time it contained no substantial content beyond what it already available in 390: 380: 28: 115:

I undid your edit to this page, because the lithic fragment page is referring to just that, lithic fragments (in the

1919: 1908: 1313: 1219: 1184: 1177: 272: 260: 333:

contourites on seismic reflection data in my day job, but I've not been able to find any public domain pictures.

287: 128: 109: 47: 3660: 2894: 2292: 2281: 727: 580: 489: 459: 422: 1441:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1256:

I made sure to mention this and link to the source on every file. Please let me know how to proceed. Thanks!

801:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

618: 1896: 645: 186: 163: 79: 2051: 2040: 1257: 1036: 1008: 986: 949: 935: 903: 888: 854: 687: 632: 503: 348: 319: 224: 176: 132: 116: 94: 59: 4146: 3323: 2612: 2473: 2103: 1498: 1487: 1158: 590: 557: 384:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 152: 144: 3667:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

3419: 4407: 3981: 3467: 1564: 1553: 1427: 735: 519: 480: 338: 307: 283: 244: 213: 1891:

documentary has been shown continuously throughout Black History Month over many decades.Sincerely A

1828: 1817: 1531: 1520: 1442: 1085: 861:"You squeezed a new section between two existing ones so I moved it to the end. Check the history." 755: 709: 676: 468: 436: 418: 51: 4420: