195:(e/c)Since I did not see the second article at all, and I dont have access to see what the page looked like either, I think Philoha's advice (which is also given by Suntag at the deletion review) would be the only help that I can offer. When the page gets recreated in your user space, if you would like some commenatary before you move it to actual article space, drop me a note. --
338:
126:
206:
Thanks, Much! I have been assuming that administrators have access to deleted articles. I have been very frustrated because it seems to me as if no one has actually read the second article. If administrative reviewers don't generally have access to deleted articles then it explains a lot to me!
179:
Hi Philca, Thanks for your response. I somehow just assumed you were an administrator. No, there was no review for this article and I am not getting any sense that anyone has actually read the second article. This is why the process is frustrating me so much! Thank you for your advice. I will
207:
Still, isn't an article supposed to be marked as an afd or for speedy deletion before it is actually deleted? I will look into doing what Philca, Suntag, and yourself are suggesting I do. I will of course ask you to share your feedback once I have done so. Thanks!
269:
141:
382:
explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
304:
article is a good example of how to use the templates to cite to different pages in the same book (actually, it was case law, but essentially the same idea). The actual method is described at
164:
for an admin to give you access to the content so you can copy it to a sub-page of you User page and work on it there. I can't help with that as I'm not an admin, a job i really don't want. --
263:
101:
Hello, you have listed a number of references for this article that you have recently created. However none of the specific statements in the article are supported by
233:
327:
26:
284:
251:
386:
363:
48:
43:
300:. The templates provide format consistency and automatically will keep up with the lates changes in citation techniques. My
420:
Thanks for your work on the article! It has been informative. It may need some fine-tuning, but over all, very nice work.
245:
133:
95:
366:, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add
137:
53:
379:
305:
241:
196:
145:
110:
84:
33:
22:
291:
60:
348:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done for the following reason:
64:
345:
331:
76:
68:
38:
105:. Please take some time to connect the statements and claims within the article with the source that
257:
277:
140:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
208:
181:
29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
402:
362:, articles that do not meet basic Knowledge (XXG) criteria may be deleted at any time. Please
75:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
169:
398:
394:
102:
425:
312:
297:
390:
359:
161:
406:
371:
301:
106:
385:
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria
401:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
296:. Also, for the inline cites, try to use cite templates, such as those provided at
165:
353:
this page seems similar to
Marriage Privatization Model, which was deleted by AfD
421:
309:
337:
125:
180:
investigate that option. I am still learning how
Knowledge (XXG) works. Best,
160:
I can't see any deletion review for this. Was there one? I suggest you ask at
429:
410:
321:
216:
201:
189:
173:
150:
115:
89:
364:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article
79:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place
236:
article looks good. You might find more information for the article at
142:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Marriage
Privatization Model
72:
336:
124:
276:
290:
132:An article that you have been involved in editing,
306:Knowledge (XXG):Citing_sources#Shortened footnotes
121:AfD nomination of Marriage Privatization Model
8:
378:on the top of the page and leave a note on
156:Deletion review for Marriage Privatization
59:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
234:User:Hermesmessage/Marriage Privatization
228:User:Hermesmessage/Marriage Privatization
83:before the question. Again, welcome! --
7:
34:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
25:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
1:
322:18:18, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
217:17:00, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
202:16:49, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
190:16:46, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
174:16:15, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
151:19:41, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
116:05:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
90:20:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
360:criteria for speedy deletion
134:Marriage Privatization Model
96:Marriage Privatization Model
49:How to write a great article
430:10:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
445:
21:Hello, Hermesmessage, and
411:05:37, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
344:A tag has been placed on
77:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
212:
185:
380:the article's talk page
416:Marriage Privatization
346:Marriage privatization
341:
332:Marriage privatization
136:, has been listed for
129:
340:
128:
198:The Red Pen of Doom
147:The Red Pen of Doom
112:The Red Pen of Doom
86:The Red Pen of Doom
342:
144:. Thank you. --
130:
44:How to edit a page
27:your contributions
330:nomination of of
103:in line citations
67:your messages on
436:
377:
376:
370:
317:
298:User:Suntag/Cite
295:
294:
280:
199:
148:
113:
87:
82:
69:discussion pages
444:
443:
439:
438:
437:
435:
434:
433:
418:
387:for biographies
374:
368:
367:
356:
335:
328:Speedy deletion
318:
315:
237:
230:
197:
158:
146:
123:
111:
99:
85:
80:
54:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
442:
440:
417:
414:
350:
334:
325:
314:
302:Nassak Diamond
229:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
192:Hermesmessage
157:
154:
122:
119:
109:the claim. --
98:
93:
57:
56:
51:
46:
41:
36:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
441:
432:
431:
427:
423:
415:
413:
412:
408:
404:
400:
399:for companies
396:
392:
391:for web sites
388:
383:
381:
373:
365:
361:
355:
354:
349:
347:
339:
333:
329:
326:
324:
323:
320:
319:
311:
307:
303:
299:
293:
289:
286:
283:
279:
275:
271:
268:
265:
262:
259:
256:
253:
250:
247:
243:
240:
239:Find sources:
235:
227:
219:Hermesmessage
218:
214:
210:
209:Hermesmessage
205:
204:
203:
200:
194:
193:
191:
187:
183:
182:Hermesmessage
178:
177:
176:
175:
171:
167:
163:
155:
153:
152:
149:
143:
139:
135:
127:
120:
118:
117:
114:
108:
104:
97:
94:
92:
91:
88:
78:
74:
70:
66:
62:
55:
52:
50:
47:
45:
42:
40:
37:
35:
32:
31:
30:
28:
24:
19:
18:
419:
384:
357:
352:
351:
343:
313:
287:
281:
273:
266:
260:
254:
248:
238:
231:
159:
131:
100:
58:
20:
16:
15:
264:free images
71:using four
358:Under the
81:{{helpme}}
61:Wikipedian
395:for bands
63:! Please
138:deletion
107:verifies
39:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
270:WP refs
258:scholar
166:Philcha
23:welcome
422:Ragazz
372:hangon
310:Suntag
242:Google
162:WP:ANI
73:tildes
403:Bob A
397:, or
308:. --
285:JSTOR
246:books
426:talk
407:talk
278:FENS
252:news
232:The
213:talk
186:talk
170:talk
65:sign
292:TWL
428:)
409:)
393:,
389:,
375:}}
369:{{
272:)
215:)
188:)
172:)
424:(
405:(
316:☼
288:·
282:·
274:·
267:·
261:·
255:·
249:·
244:(
211:(
184:(
168:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
