2164:
a point where it is, unfortunately, not worth the effort anymore. Life is just a series of effort to reword ratios, and in this case, the stress of another FAC that I'm fairly certain SV will be able to derail again single-handedly is not worth the amount of hours I would need to put in just for the chance of getting another FAC notch on my belt. She's going to argue that the article shouldn't have been renominated because a consensus was not reached and she's going to ping her friend to the conversation who is going to give it a second oppose vote, and two oppose votes is all it will take to fail the nomination. Also I have uni work I need to focus on so I'm planning on spending less time on
Knowledge (XXG) in the coming weeks anyway. I also, unfortunately, don't actually support the article myself for FAC in its current version. SV has removed a plethora of content without consensus, and in some cases she has removed content even though there was a consensus for it to remain. I made a list on the article's talk page. As you're aware, she reverts everything I add to the article, which means I can't fix any of the problems the article has, and even if this did go to FAC every time a reviewer would make a suggestion to improve the article and I tried to implement the change she would just revert it. I actually was going to nominate the article again before she resorted to this tactic, but her reversion of everything has been the final straw. You're right; I should renominate it, but I don't have the energy or the time.
1470:(i looked up how to send messages so if this is not how then sorry) I have actually removed the "Fucking" part of the track listing as i looked into it and it didn't have that, i got that info from the guy who actually told everyone the track so I guessed it changed, though YOU -yes you- have actually been deleting tracks that we know will be on the album (like say10) though the tracks\ "Stigmata" are obviously not confirmed so its understandable why it wouldn't be in the track listing, I have not caused the Heaven Upside Down Knowledge (XXG) page to be protected 2 times this month, as it is the multiple people (from what i've seen they don't use accounts and just have their IP's) who have been constantly deleting information, my edits were protected on the page because they were correct (at least for the time being), also, i have only seen the page protected ONCE this month, if you continue to spread misinformation on the Heaven Upside Down Knowledge (XXG) page, it will be YOU who gets banned, goodbye.
1933:
result in me having to order it again through somebody else. Will keep you posted. Also sorry to be a pain but I've just replaced one of the sources used in the article. The original editor who added the "Biohazard 3 Last Escape
Official Guide Book" source to the article did not specify the page number in the source that backs up the statement. As my Japanese language skills are fairly basic even if I do order the source it's highly likely I won't be able to find the appropriate page, let alone translate it accurately, hence replacing it with different though relevant information from an online source. I did order the Japanese source "Biohazard Official Navigation Book" last week as based on what it is used to source, I believe it will be much easier for me to verify that one. So yeah, the only two sources I haven't verified now have been ordered, and everything else that I haven't verified has been removed.
60:(I wouldn't use this as a reference in the article though). I added further, more-specific (online) references where I could find them for these peaks; but unfortunately, two of the ARIA Reports archived on the National Library of Australia site that I wanted to cite cannot be referenced properly on the wikipedia page (it brings up a citation error), due to the URL directing to a download link (where you have to save the file in order to be able to read it). The URL's were: pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/23790/20020221-0000/www.aria.com.au/issue585.PDF (for the week 'Give Me a Reason' fell out of the top 100), and pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/23790/20050320-0000/ISSUE786.doc for the week 'Long Night' fell out of the top 100. I usually cite the ARIA report for the week where a single has fallen out of the top 100, as this displays its final peak (in the HP/highest position column).
1948:
arrived back at his house, I'll get him to send it to you again." Funny thing was, when it finally arrived, there was no indication on the packaging that it had ever been returned to sender, and it was her name/signature/address on the attached
Swedish customs form—dated just a few days before it arrived at my house. "Out of the country", my ass. People on eBay can be such BS-ers. Keep that in mind. ;) Anyway, it's fine for you to still work on Jill Valentine as you see fit. The source review is written in such a way that it can easily be amended if/when the sources are altered. BTW, I've just spent the past couple of hours writing up some notes about DJ AM. Not ready to add to the peer review just yet, but soon. ;)
2091:
the next FAC, because she's arguably far too invested one way or the other at this point anyway—she incorrectly summarised how many opposes your nomination had; wasn't paying the slightest bit of attention to how far the FAC was progressing before closing; is clearly giving too much weight to SV's comments. And regarding SV, it might be helpful to save the diffs of her completely re-writing her reasons for opposing so many times (lest we forget all those minor edits in-between). Just so, when she returns at FAC3 – and she will! – you'll be able to show newcomers how you've tried your best to rectify every one of her criticisms, yet she's constantly fishing for new reasons to oppose. How a
3121:-related pages. I would encourage you to open a new sock puppet investigation, on the username page I linked earlier (check the archived cases for examples of their 'work'), so that they can be dealt with (again). It seems they have now moved on to vandalising discographies by rock/alternative artists, such as The Smashing Pumpkins, Faith No More, and Silverchair. Be warned - they often turn abusive in edit summaries, and even edited my user page at one point, with comments like I'm a kiddie fiddler, I've been in jail, etc. They are also incredibly persistent. I suggest you also request page protection and administrator assistance in dealing with vandalism if they persist.
1091:, you have a number of offline sources for music magazine articles, and I'd like to know how you got access to them. I'm not denying that these sources are real, I'm asking as a fellow music editor. I work on most of the Rise Against articles, and the magazine databases I have access to only have Billboard and Rolling Stone. These databases show a decent amount of Rise Against articles from Alternative Press and Spin, but these databases don't have those magazines. Is there any particular database your using, or is there some other way you're getting access to these magazines? Thanks.
2076:
in a few weeks (maybe longer) once I've finished working on a couple other projects. I'll ping you and everyone else to the nomination when it is opened. It became quite apparent that people who oppose the nomination are not going take your source review at face value. Accordingly, when it is renominated, I would probably find it more helpful if you reviewed the article on its content rather than sources (though by all means you are welcome to do both haha). Let me know if you have any GA or FAC nominations in the meantime; I'd be happy to take a look at them. Cheers. :)
2746:
you use bass tablature, and you keep the chord symbols for actual chords. There are two or three other
Ultimate Guitar charts up for this song already, so that self-correcting process may be underway. Ultimate Guitar is less closely curated than Knowledge (XXG), though, as evident in the large number of conflicting transcriptions available for many popular songs, so the transcription by the contributor you referenced may instead stay online for the foreseeable future. It would be great to have correct information in the Knowledge (XXG) article, though.
3152:
edit-protected, they seem to have a long-line of previously unused, but auto-confirmed accounts to continue the disruption. Clearly not an ordinary vandal. I see the
Smashing Pumpkins discography page has gotten extended edit protection, and would suggest you request the same for the other articles they're disrupting. I've never initiated a sockpuppet investigation, though, and wouldn't really know where to start. You seem to know more than anyone about this guy. Maybe it'd be better coming from you? Or maybe leaving a message explaining all this at
1258:
promoted as it will not have enough reviews. Have you considered contacting another FAC nominator (or several) directly and asking to exchange reviews? I.e you'll review their nomination if they review yours? I find that is often effective. You could also leave a request for review message at the talk pages of all the projects the article is under the scope of. This is less likely to get results, but it sure won't hurt. If you'd like me to help you try and get some more people to comment on the nomination somehow let me know.
2061:, all-guns-blazing-style. From what I can see: Jill Valentine has 8 supports (when she only needed 3 + image and source reviews); Sergecross73 "no longer ha any objections."; bridies and niwi3 seem to be on the verge of supporting (the latter wants to examine the sources for themselves, and I'm confident they won't find any issues on that end); and then there's the other two users—evidently nothing anyone can do in regards to them. But it's obvious which way the tide is going this time. Keep at it. You're almost there. ;)
2037:
there has some completely unreasonable requests mixed in with their valid concerns, at the end of the day, I think the article does look better now than it did at my first nomination. I'm confident that if it doesn't pass its nomination this time round it will definitely pass it's third. I've recently done a restructure of the article to meet certain FAC concerns. If you've got the time, let me know what you think, but no worries if you've just plain had enough with the nomination and article haha. I know the feeling. :)
1991:
previous nomination. You are clearly not the reason why the first nomination failed, but I don't think the discussion you had with
Ealdgyth helped improve the situation at all. I appreciate the vote of confidence on a personal level but if CR4ZE comes back with a rebuttal standing by his original concerns I'd strongly preferred it if you just said you disagree with him once more, say why, and then just leave it there. Let's try and avoid anything that clogs up the page too much. :)
2206:
position where she would support it in the meantime; there's also the possibility that she'll lose interest once she has no-one left to bully and she realises she's chased away everyone who could actually explain the subject to her (as you probably noticed we needed to constantly explain things to her because she doesn't understand how video games work). I don't actually have any plans for the article in the future, but I can't see how taking a break could hurt at all. :)
2140:
during either FAC2, the "peer review", or the thread you created @ Talk:WP:Video games). I think even Czar has realised by this point his mistake in sticking up for SarahSV back at that Talk:WP:VG thread. Even he seems sick of her. Then tell
Sarastro1 to take a hike, and ask Ian Rose to take over and look at FAC3 with a fresh set of eyes—he's by far the more competent of the FAC administrators anyway. Seriously, I am absolutely disgusted by this entire thing. And yet
665:
173:(I've not actually made an edit to the article yet, though. I'm still in the preview-in-my-sandbox/save-to-a-notepad-document phase). I'll be making several such edits over the next couple of weeks - either adding or taking stuff from the band's album articles. It's nothing to be concerned about. When I've posted my changes and - hopefully - nominate the band's article for GA, I'll then go through the album articles, sourcing what I've done along the way.
1743:
2786:. But I see where you're coming from. I guess this is the problem when you have user-generated pages as sources: what was on the article was what was originally up at Ultimate Guitar, but it's been changed, apparently. I'll make your suggested changes to the article in a moment. I think I've done everything you've wanted. Let me know if I screwed up somehow, or if there's anything else. Sorry for the confusion.
2601:
2450:
1216:
359:
1278:
sources. In your experience at FAC, could that be a problem? All those journals have been scanned/transcribed by fansites, so are easily accessible, but maybe people aren't aware of that. Would it be a good idea to temporarily add them to the article? I've been reluctant to do so, because I figured someone would come along and go: "Strong oppose. Article contains links to
108:
2554:
2403:
312:
1632:
2515:
2364:
1810:
1177:
252:
2712:. (You may also note that the contributor of the bass tab clearly believes the song is in the time signature 4/4, as it audibly appears to be.) You may want to consider correcting your analysis of the verse chords to indicate that the verse is a Dm harmony throughout, as had been stated before your recent changes to the Knowledge (XXG) article.
2838:, I edit most of the articles for albums that enter a chart. I do not see the Top Album Sales included very often, and if it is, it's on older album articles that actually are not of good or featured quality. You claim streaming affects rock albums disproportionately; I don't see that this is the case. Several rock albums have topped the
1918:
weren't kidding about how thorough it was going to be :). In that case I'll definitely give you some more warning before I renominate the article. According to the seller the book I ordered was due to arrive by today (but it hasn't yet) so I am expecting it by the end of the week, assuming it hasn't gotten lost in the mail of course.
2057:
placate a certain someone (i.e., all that loaded stuff she wrote about you wanting the article promoted just to get points for the WikiCup, or you somehow wanting to sully the main page). It seems she'll always be there, editing her reasons for opposing, 3 times, if not more. And I don't know who
Victoriaearle is, but she certainly
2695:
find a source for the indicated time signature, perhaps it should be removed, as the song is audibly in 4/4. This may most easily shown by counting the beats through, say, verse 1 and then dividing by the number of measures in the verse as would be found in a complete song chart - not visible in your
Ultimate Guitar reference
2882:
regard to that reference being used elsewhere on the article. You really need to start paying more attention to what you're doing. And you can't be all that against component charts anyway, since Top
Alternative Albums, Top Hard Rock Albums and Top Rock Albums are still there. Go elsewhere and establish a consensus.
2745:
I expect someone will come along on Ultimate Guitar at some point to clean up the chart you used as a reference, or to post a new, corrected copy of the tab. In my experience the contributor's use of chord symbols for bass notes is not widely accepted on tab sites: if you want to indicate bass notes,
2167:
Niwi3 is not the problem. Many of SV's concerns were valid, so there's no problem with someone agreeing with her actual concerns. It's her toxic personality, refusal to co-operate with others, ignoring of any criticism and bullying other editors away that is the issue. Addressing Niwi3's concerns, in
2090:
That sucks, although not surprising. This is now the second time that Sarastro1 has junked the nomination while paraphrasing in her closing note things which SlimVirgin had written a few weeks earlier. More than coincidence, obviously. I really think it would be better to ask her to recuse herself at
1962:
The eBay source ended up arriving today and I've just renominated the article. Also just letting you know before renominating it I added two high-quality offline video game magazines as sources for one sentence each, otherwise the only thing new is some minor expansion with the eBay source. Hopefully
1711:
Yeah, I started your source review a couple of days ago (have it saved to notepad). I couldn't really do much because I'm still working. I'll be off tomorrow evening after a 12-hour shift, so can't imagine I'd be in much mood to do it then. I'll do it gradually over the weekend, and am hoping to have
1132:
Dang, that's a bummer. There aren't any fansites for Rise Against, aside from a small subreddit. I've noticed that fansites for Bad Religion and Massive Attack also have magazine scans, so I guess that's an added benefit to working on articles related to influential bands. Thanks for the response and
1017:
It's not my article; it's not anybody's. I don't see how my summary speaks to me "owning" the article. I just said, you left it for weeks, so I assumed you didn't have an issue with the silent correction of the quote. Thanks for expanding the article, but I also didn't create the "stub" or any of the
545:
There is usually nothing wrong with linking to redirects to articles. Some editors are tempted, upon finding a link to a redirect page, to bypass the redirect and point the link directly at the target page. While there are a limited number of cases where this is beneficial, there is otherwise no good
2932:
can establish a consensus for it. However, I'm not going to continue fighting over it as clearly you're not going to give up until you get your way. Way to hold a grudge—I had totally forgotten about the Nelly Furtado article dilemma. I think you need to get over it, because remembering disputes you
2881:
specifically says component charts can be included if a case can be made for inclusion – which I believe can be done in this instance, as its appearance on Top Album Sales is used to source information contained in the critical reception section. Yet you've twice deleted the entire reference with no
2719:
harmony, you might make an argument that the contributor's chord indicator "F" in the verses is valid and does indicate an F chord, a possibly defensible claim. But in an interpretation more in line with the contributor's comments, the F chord symbol is just indicating the F bass note in the verse's
2704:
One of the changes you recently made indicates a three-chord harmony pattern in the verses, using the chords Dm, F, and Gm. I see that your Ultimate Guitar source claims that the chord choices shown in the tab are (I believe in the verse and outro sections alone) indications of the bass-line, not of
2694:
Thanks for your contributions to the article on Killing Strangers. In your recent edit reversion and changes under the article's "Composition and style" section, the time signature "6/8" crept back in from an earlier version of the article, though it's not backed by the source you used. If you can't
2163:
Hey mate. I really appreciate the support. Obviously I'm not happy with how this ended either, but basically I just need to take a break from the whole thing. Every day it makes me more and more stressed and I don't want to be miserable anymore, so my only option is to walk away. I've really reached
2139:
to build the encyclopedia (as I said over a month ago above). Renominate the article at FAC. Explain the situation with SarahSV fully in your opening comment. Point out that Niwi3 regularly says "I agree with SV" or "SlimVirgin" (he/she began no less than 8 of their comments with those exact words,
2075:
Yep, closed when I was only a couple edits away from addressing the final concerns of one person opposing. Not to mind, I'm sure the third nomination will go much smoother since the overwhelming majority of concerns raised at the second one have already been fixed. I intend to renominate the article
2036:
Hey mate, just wanted to let you know I actually won't be particularly upset if the new nomination fails, which it looks like it may (it still has a fighting chance though). Every time I get hammered with a new list of things to work on the article does get better as a result. While a certain editor
1947:
Sorry to hear about your eBay troubles. Reminds me of the time I spent almost €400 on two very rare vinyls on eBay, then the seller stringed me along for nearly 10 weeks: "I sent it! It must have gotten lost in the mail!", "I've been out of the country, I couldn't deal with it!", "My husband says it
1902:
was the portion of the article with the most feedback from certain users during the last FAC, so I've still got a decent chunk of work to do. Thanks for reviewing the 3 Manson articles. I swear I'll make it up to you, eventually. ;) Is it too late to comment on your newest peer review, or would I be
1296:
Hi again. I've just seen this message now as I've returned from a Wikibreak. Personally I don't think the offline sources are the cause of the problem. The only potential thing I can see that might be putting people off is the sheer number of failed nominations - people may think if it hasn't passed
1257:
Hi Homeostasis07. I'm not sure why nobody is commenting on the Holy Wood FAC nomination, but it's a shame it isn't getting any attention from elsewhere. If it reaches the bottom of the 'older nominations' queue and I am the only one supporting it, even though nobody is opposing it is not going to be
994:
says we can non-controversially correct spelling errors when it doesn't change context and we know what the author means. It's pointless to leave typos in because you don't like that the author gave an album you like a negative write-up and you want readers to see evidence of their "attention span".
141:
template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons
2247:
A co-nomination certainly sounds more appealing than doing it myself. It's not a tricky process, anyone can nominate an article for FAC and just list someone else as the co-nominator. I'd probably want to wait considerably longer than a couple weeks though. Also just for the record I'm not taking a
2056:
in returning to that cesspool. Looking at how you've handled the second FAC, there's no doubt you've worked your ass off to appease certain people. It's definitely a better-lookin' article for it too, but keep in mind – and I'm sure the admins have seen it by this stage as well – you're never gonna
2019:
There's something foul afoot at FAC, me thinks, and it may be in your best interest to ask Sarastro1 to recuse herself, and then ping Ian Rose and ask him to take over as the deciding admin. He's by far the better of the admins at FAC anyway. It's obvious from those links above that Sarastro1 had a
1917:
It's not too late to comment on the peer review; I'm not in any real hurry regarding that. I'd prefer to get comments on it before it goes to FAC but it won't be going there for a while as Jill is obviously next in line. Thanks for letting me know where you're at with the source review. I guess you
1614:
Yeah, no worries. If you don't mind, it might be later next week before I can get to it. Today has been my only day off work since Monday, and I'm back in tomorrow . I had some beer and tequila last night, and – I think I vaguely remember someone opening a bottle of – sambuca, or it might have been
3283:
Kudos on the expansion. Looks good. ;) I'll be able to review it sometime tomorrow, hopefully. I owe 6 more reviews to GAN anyway, so I don't mind. I also see the Marilyn Manson (band) article is still waiting there, after being nominated back in February. Ridiculous. :( I'll also try and review a
3015:
might have appeared on, and came across that URL. I forget what article it was, though—I'll have to go through my history to find out. The other article must have conflated G-Music with 5-Music as well, because I'm sure the only things I changed in that reference were the access/archive dates, and
2186:
That's a shame. Completely understandable, but still a shame. If I were you, I'd take a little break from Knowledge (XXG) – sometimes it's not enough to go away on holiday, because as soon as you come back online you see exactly the same crap happening as before you went away, which makes you even
1875:
Hi there. Thanks for your recent edits to Jill Valentine, and also Don't Say You Love Me :). While technically I can renominate Jill today, I'm still waiting on one of the offline sources I ordered to arrive in the mail. It might turn up tomorrow, or not until next week. Basically just letting you
1277:
going on at the moment, but that should only take a few hours to finish, so I should be free to start contacting other nominators over the next week. I'm starting to think the reason no-one wants to get involved in doing a source review is because of the sheer amount (nearly 20) of offline journal
891:
You clearly haven't read a single word I've written, and you're obviously just looking for an argument. 3 reverts over the space of a 6-day period is hardly edit-warring by any stretch of the imagination, and the user of one of the edits I reverted in fact reverted his own edit at the image's page
63:
The ARIA chart scan I added for "What Can I Do" was photocopied from my State Library 10 years ago. Unfortunately the ARIA reports from April to December 1999 inclusive were missing, and so I don't have one for the week "So Young" fell out of the chart, but the peak is listed in Gavin Ryan's book.
2728:
decorating the Dm chord in the verses (and outro), and I suspect the correct interpretation is that the F bass note in the same areas is also just a chord note in the Dm harmony of the verses. So the Ultimate Guitar source's indication that an F chord and a Gm chord appear in the verses is better
2232:
next time around. The article is definitely a mess as it is right now. After we let that baby have her bottle for a couple of weeks – because there clearly is no reasoning with her – what do you say the two of us give the entire article a good-going-over afterwards? I was serious when I said this
2205:
Oh wow that reminds me I haven't even listened to his new album yet haha, thanks for linking to that. :) As I indicated, I'm not currently watching the article, but I figure that taking a break might work for several reasons. Firstly there's a small chance she might actually move the article to a
2171:
I'm not really sure what to do at this point, her behaviour does need to be reported to someone with some form of authority, but I don't have the energy to time to even do that. I just know I need to take a break from the whole thing. But thanks for your vote of support; It's nice to know someone
1890:
Hi again. Sorry I've not been able to get to your peer review yet. The source review has taken a bit longer than expected. I have random, fairly-indecipherable-to-anyone-but-me notes for every single reference on the page, but, realistically, if you were to renominate the article now, I'd only be
1728:
Thank you for providing a SR on my FAC. I can see why you had to be detailed in your approach; that Ealdgyth took issue with your then half-assed review in the Jill Valentine article, which is why it didn't make FA. I think Ealdgyth has a stringent approach in doing a source review, but there's a
3411:
Whichever you feel like. ;) Thanks for improving so many of the band's song articles, by the way. You may have noticed I worked on the band's main article, as well as a few of their album pages over the last couple of years, but I never really got around to working on any of their song articles.
1990:
Hi Homeostasis07. Thanks again for the source review. While I am not opposed to the comment you recently left on the nomination aimed at CR4ZE, at this stage I'd prefer it if you only stated you disagree with people once and avoid the kind of long back and forth discussion that took place at the
1932:
It's great to hear the source review is finished. Thanks. At this stage the offline source I ordered is several days overdue so I'm launching a complaint through eBay regarding not receiving it within the designated time. I have a bad feeling this is going to get dragged out for a while, and may
816:
You know, the more I think about how I acted towards you, the worse I feel. I was just frustrated – still am – about that whole move review, but you didn't deserve how I lashed out at you like that. I'm sorry. I've noticed you editing all over the place recently. You're an awesome Wikipedian! ;)
495:
The names of venues tend to change because of sponsorship deals with naming rights. A redirect provides a simple way to ensure that all links to an old name will go to the article under the current name. Piping an old name to the current name is pointless because if the name changes again, as it
2666:
I might be blind, but where exactly on that article does it say you can't use UG's genre specifications? All I see is "Articles that aren't written by "UG Team" (or any of the team's members) are unreliable." Amy Sciarretto is listed as a staff writer, two minutes of research has shown she is a
187:
It's not about sources, it's about copying from one article to another without providing attribution. What you need to do, whenever you copy from one Knowledge (XXG) article to another, is give attribution, at a minimum by saying in your edit summary where you copied the content from. This is
989:
Why are you disputing this? You left the article alone for weeks, now you're returning to restore a trivial spelling error when we know what the author means. Your edit summary basically says you want to retain the typo because you don't like the negative review. That's not really a reason.
3151:
Thanks for the heads-up. I knew it had to be a sockpuppet or a banned user of some sort, because they seem to know just enough about Knowledge (XXG) policy to know how to cause maximum disruption: you give one IP a warning, then they come back next time with a different IP; when pages are
2168:
comparison to trying to address SV's, has been rather easy, and he says himself that he wouldn't oppose the nomination in its current format. I honestly believe Niwi3 is trying to move the article into a position he can support, and I honestly believe SV is trying to do the opposite.
2959:
2723:
And despite the contributor's use of the Gm chord symbol in the verses, there's no Gm audible. That would generally require at a minimum a Bb playing with or near the G bass note to establish the Gm harmony, which does not occur. Instead, the G note in the bass is audibly an
1729:
slim chance that you and she would clash again since her expertise is mostly about History and Women. Perhaps you might wanna add the FAR page onto your watch list until it gets promoted by a coordinator, because some might have issue with it. Btw, here's for your trouble:
286:. So your effort is much appreciated. There's no rush. Just keep in mind, that I find it very hard to make time for Knowledge (XXG) during weekends. So if you post some corrections on Saturday, please give me until at least Monday to implement your corrections. Cheers.
1058:. Reverting somebody because you disagree doesn't mean a claim of ownership... I really don't get this. I don't have anything against you. Your expansion of stubs is welcome, I just disagree with the retention of the obvious typo for the reason you implied.
2051:
Shame there's no "Patience of a Saint" barnstar, because you definitely deserve one. ;) I mean, I completely gave up on FAC sometime after the first Jill Valentine debacle. I've got a few other articles in the bag that I think may be FA quality, but I've
2908:, the subordinate chart can be mentioned: take, for example, a single which had no airplay because of objectionable content, but still charted extremely high on the composite chart due to sales." (Emphasis added.) Number two versus eight is hardly
1563:
Yeah. That title is most likely BS, and until it's confirmed it shouldn't be included. I wouldn't be all that surprised if ended up being genuine, though. I don't think I would've believed a title like "Doll-Dagga Buzz-Buzz Ziggety-Zag" either. ;)
1350:
in the time between you last nominated it and me re-nominating it. Some re-writing here, some re-arranging there, but you pretty much got it to FA-status yourself. ;) The other articles, now they were a different story. As you probably remember,
2729:
explained by saying that the verses are a continuous Dm harmony, and the F and Gm indicators in the tab are just the contributor's attempt to indicate the verse's bass notes (pretty much as the contributor actually says on Ultimate Guitar).
2705:
the actual chords or harmony at those points. In the contributor's words, "he chords are based from how the bass notes were played in the orginal song" and "or the verses and the outro, it is possible to simply strum Dm all throughout".
2233:
whole thing pisses me off. The amount of goddamn money you spent buying those sources, and this is how it ends? Nope. Not gonna let that happen. Take your well-deserved Wiki break. I want you refreshed. There are machinations afoot. ;)
2134:
Don't let them do that to you. I've been watching that review the entire time, although figured it'd be better for me to stay away for fear of making things worse. If anything, that "peer review" demonstrates clearly that SarahSV is
2269:
1118:, so that's how I was able to access them (was debating with myself as to whether I should include links for those journals on the article, but figured it was unwise to include links to fansites). Sorry I couldn't be more help.
2010:. The tone of CR4ZE's comment stinks to high heaven though, and you'd be wise to go through the history of every talk page of every opposing user of the last FAC, because there's some fascinating reading on them there pages:
1425:
As Manson used to say, "you can't kill me, motherfucker!" LOL. Life just took over. I ain't dead yet. =) Also, don't discount your re-writes here, re-arranging there. That's what it took to finally take the article to FA ;)
3136:
Other hallmarks of their behaviour include random capital letters in sentences, poor punctuation/expression/grammar (writing as though English is not their native language), and claims of being a music/chart historian for
1589:
2850:
200. It'd be like including the Australian streaming albums chart if Manson was successful on that. It isn't relevant if he made the overall chart and most editors would remove it for being a component of the main chart.
1498:
during the song's final chorus, because BMI officially has it as "We Know Where You Live". Please realize that I'm a massive Manson fan, and I want the band's articles to be as high-quality and accurate as possible—I was
3112:
page. The pattern of vandalism - multiple accounts and IP addresses adding false and unreferenced chart peaks to discography pages, and persistently doing so with new accounts and IP addresses - is characteristic of
516:
It is generally not good practice to pipe links simply to avoid redirects. The number of links to a redirect page can be a useful gauge of when it would be helpful to spin off a subtopic of an article into its own
2812:. Thank you for updating the article as you did. I see a couple of tiny things that slipped away, but I'll change them directly rather than generate another wall of text here. Good luck with your other articles.
1297:
by now it's not going to. Anyway I think the solution you've done in the meantime with the fansite addition then reversion was a good idea. Also just commenting on your pet project linked above, have a read of
2701:. Continuing to propose a time signature of 6/8 would need some sort of authoritative source to be acceptable in Knowledge (XXG), as even Ultimate Guitar elsewhere contradicts that time signature (see below).
423:
Weird. What exactly is the situation with Ray of Light now? The page can't be edited by anyone but admins, yet the other user has blanked his contributions to the talk page? This is a strange one, indeed.
281:
Thanks a lot for taking the time to do this. To be honest, after browsing through the GAN page for the past month or so, I was half expecting it to be September by the time someone got around to reviewing
1548:
I'm glad that we can come to an understanding, hopefully we can work together to get accurate info on the page, and stop people from adding songs like "jesus crisis" (seriously, "jesus crisis" lol wtf"
1395:
sections in a week or two. Again, it really is nice to see you back. In my darker moments, I genuinely thought you may have died or something. I hate seeing Manson fans vanish for 3 years solid. :(
2708:
It seems the contributor used chord symbols like F and Gm to indicate verse bass notes F and G, which are notated much more clearly on the Ultimate Guitar site in the Killing Strangers bass tab at
1861:, although I'm more than happy to continue waiting for my other noms to be reviewed, if you're too busy for the others. I've waited since February, so a couple more months wouldn't be a bother. ;)
693:
56:
page. The peaks already listed in the table were correct. The Gavin Ryan book I've cited covers all top 100 chart peaks until December 2010 - I've taken a screen shot of the pdf copy here -
3065:, I'm even more confused. The source is talking more about Jill Pangallo (whomever she is) than the actual song. Still, there's no doubt – in my mind – that "Against All Odds" is a soft rock/
860:
Please consider this a warning (also with what I wrote on my talk page, but I wanted to put something on your talk page to make it official) that your edits in removing an album cover from
1106:
Hi. Are there any Rise Against fansites that you know of that might have some scans of older interviews? I've searched Google, but couldn't find anything of substance. All the journals at
679:
2098:
became an admin in the first place is infuriating. Outside of that, I wouldn't even waste time responding to her at the next FAC. She'll never support, and you're wasting your energy. :(
546:
reason to pipe links solely to avoid redirects. Doing so is generally an unhelpful, time-wasting exercise that can actually be detrimental. It is almost never helpful to replace ] with ].
1649:
Lol. ;) Just had a quick peruse of the references, which all look fine to me. Just a heads up: I'm not all that confident that someone else won't come along and bitch about reference #9—
722:
Hi. In regards to refer to the aforementioned genres in a precise manner. NME Review says "‘Sounds Good Feels Good’ is obviously more pop than punk", which sounds a little too vague.
625:
3196:
1369:
were pretty awful articles before I reworked them: poor grammar, unverifiable original research, pretty much the entire articles dependant on that Nachtkabarett fan-website. Now,
188:
required by the terms of the CC-by-SA license, and needs to be done at the time you make the edit. The edit summary also makes easier my work of checking items in the bot report
3114:
86:
Wow. Thanks a lot for all your work. You went above and beyond. I'll be using that Pandora archive for a tonne of other artists quite often in the near future. ;) Thanks again.
1533:, because I'm really not in the mood of building up an entire Manson article from scratch. If you ever need help with anything, I'd be glad to offer it to you. Thanks again.
496:
surely will when the current sponsorship deal comes to an end, the piped name will itself become a redirect and the already trivial benefit of a direct link will be lost.
3188:
3179:
1758:
1529:(see above). Now that you're not gonna be adding the "Fucking" anymore, I'll delete the warning. I hope I've not scared you off, and that you keep coming back to edit
1525:
1088:
1327:
Homeostasis, congrats on bringing Holy Wood to FA. I also see you've brought several other Manson articles to GA status. =) Dude, you're a machine! Again, congrats. -
3327:
932:
article stating that the song is dance-pop. I have tried to explain this to IndianBio, but he just reverts my edits. This song sounds even more like dance-pop than
2187:
more stressed. A dedicated Wiki break, where you still go about the rest of your online business but intensionally ignore Knowledge (XXG), is best – listen to some
2006:
I know, I know. I saw how Ealdgyth and Sarastro1 took what I said and blew it all out of proportion, thereby giving Sarastro1 the ammunition needed to do what she
67:
The ARIA Reports from 2001 (when they were first sent out digitally to subscribers) are archived here if you want to check for post-2010 peaks outside the top 50:
2561:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
2410:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
319:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
3078:
2920:
sales" even though, as other users continually and quite rightly point out, sales are not everything anymore and they're getting lower all the time. Also, per
1696:
Hey man, pardon me for intruding your peace, but just wondering if you still intend to review the sources as you are about to become busy again in a few days.
523:
Non-piped links make better use of the "what links here" tool, making it easier to track how articles are linked and helping with large-scale changes to links.
3348:
Wow. Are you a machine or what? ;) Yeah, I'd be willing to review it. No promises but... probably tomorrow night, and definitely sometime before Christmas.
1857:
Yeah, no problem. There's another little project *wink wink* that I'd like to get under my belt first. Shouldn't take too much longer. Thanks for reviewing
2248:
complete Wikibreak right now, I'm just taking a complete break from anything controversial/stressful or time consuming on here. I'll still be around. :)
2228:: This stuff can make a "bladder flex". ;) You know, I'm starting to think it may be a good idea for the two of us to co-nominate (however you do that)
3412:
Plus, I'm sorta burnt out from Knowledge (XXG), so it's cool to know that there's someone else out there who cares enough to do this sort of stuff. ;)
2958:. Nowhere does it say Five Music is connected to G-Music. The sites contain no links to each other and I can find no evidence the two are connected.
1661:? Aside from that, I don't foresee any possible problems. Thankfully there are no offline/book sources for me to screw up/forget about this time. ;)
3039:
2608:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
2457:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
1223:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
366:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
3195:
for January 5, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at
872:
for a consensus to be reached and the image cannot be speedy deleted due to being orphaned. If you remove the image again without a consensus at
588:
Hi. We are going to discuss Personnel subheaders. There are reasons I put them under subheaders and if you'd like voice your opinion, please do:
143:
2020:
problem with the article from the get-go, and decided long before the conclusion of the last FAC to canvas around for reasons to not promote it.
1840:
127:
does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Knowledge (XXG), this is supplied at minimum in an
2294:
looks like a pretty cool article. Might be a couple of days after Christmas before I can get to it, though. And happy Christmas to you, BTW. ;)
2268:
while searching for information on Jill Valentine, so I ended up expanding that article. I've currently got it nominated for featured status.
1839:
Hi Homeostasis07. I'm happy to review this article. Just throwing it out there, if you'd be so kind as to take a look at and make comments at
723:
2595:
2548:
2444:
2397:
1210:
353:
306:
641:
131:
at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted
3342:
3062:
3047:
1876:
know I'll renominate it when the source turns up and I can see if it verifies the section of the article with the citation request tag.
637:
112:
2095:
1387:-era interviews at the moment, so hopefully I'll be able to read/digest all those interviews and rapidly poop out some decent-quality
3109:
1843:, I'll happily review your other nominations as well after I finish this one. No worries if you don't have time for that though. :)
675:
2142:
this is the only recourse we have against admins misusing their position, and roping other administrators in to do their dirty work
2605:
2562:
2518:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
2367:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
1813:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
1180:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
255:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
3074:
2191:;) and then come back all-guns-blazing. She's got ownership issues, on top of everything else. That can easily be resolved. ;)
2007:
2221:
120:
3157:
1510:
589:
3199:, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks!
2144:? This entire website can be bullshit sometimes, but don't let them dissuade you. If anything, I'd work on getting SarahSV
868:
since you have been told that due to the previous discussion that was closed as no consensus, that you need to start a new
737:
I'm assuming this was posted here in error? I've never edited that article, and don't know what any of this means. Sorry.
40:
568:
Thanks for the info. I always thought it was better to link directly to the article, but obviously not. I get ya now. ;)
28:
2962:
says Five Music is one store located in Taiwan. Even if it were a chain, it's still one chain of stores, which violates
3061:
Hmm. Interesting. I had no idea what you were talking about because I've never edited that article, but after reading
2591:
2544:
2501:
2493:
1353:
915:
1440:
I see you doing some re-writes and re-arranging yourself. Hope you don't mind that I gave it another going-over. ;)
3431:
3405:
3377:
3339:
3310:
3266:
2609:
2458:
2225:
1224:
447:
367:
2643:
2488:
2337:
1783:
1152:
776:
By reading the content of comments and responding in a way that addresses the issues. Now, if you don't mind, I'm
227:
2264:
1243:
1220:
1196:
727:
189:
2963:
2053:
1273:
Yeah, it's a bit disappointing to see it sitting there with no more input. Thanks for the tip, though. I've got
865:
3070:
2741:
The verses appear to be a drone Dm harmony throughout, not a pattern of chords as now described in the article.
2709:
2699:
1553:
1475:
558:
2696:
3051:
2308:
Haha sorry about the confusion. Take your time getting to the review. And a belated Merry Xmas to you to. :)
794:
Brrrrrr....... Enjoy your weather :). Meanwhile, I'll do my best to read and read first before commenting. --
3417:
3391:
3353:
3289:
3165:
3093:
3025:
2887:
2791:
2676:
2299:
2238:
2196:
2153:
2103:
2066:
2025:
1953:
1908:
1866:
1717:
1666:
1620:
1569:
1538:
1445:
1400:
1374:
1287:
1123:
1045:
971:
897:
822:
785:
742:
633:
573:
473:
429:
291:
211:
178:
91:
17:
3069:
song. It just needs a better/more direct source. Pop isn't something to be sneered at, by the way. Some of
504:
124:
3223:
2817:
2756:
716:
706:
3017:
2901:
2878:
2774:
I didn't mean to ignore you. I read this shortly after you posted it, but was busy at the time expanding
2715:
If you want to claim that there are multiple chords in the verse sections, rather than the continuous Dm
1549:
1485:
1471:
1377:
looks like a great article too. I'll make that my next FA project. ;) If you don't mind, I'd like to get
1037:
3427:
3401:
3373:
3335:
3331:
3306:
3278:
3262:
3258:
3254:
3084:
2648:
1769:
1701:
1680:
1640:
1597:
1431:
1332:
1138:
1096:
944:
363:
320:
170:
116:
53:
2813:
2769:
2752:
2145:
1514:
533:
1765:
1697:
1676:
1636:
1609:
1593:
757:
Making a point in RMs aren't easy, but I frequently made comments in most RMs. If some of my comments
3077:
referred to as "popular music". In any case, you'd be better off raising this issue on the articles'
3016:
the archive URL (if I remember right, the original article/reference used webcitation.org). Anyways,
2262:
When life gives you lemons, make lemonade :). I inadvertently found a lot of information on the film
1239:
1234:
1206:
1192:
1187:
1163:
1156:
928:
683:
2136:
2092:
1383:
up to code first before I start work on anything else. I'm in the middle of reading all of Manson's
1279:
624:
for 15 January 2017. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at
520:
Introducing unnecessary invisible text makes the article more difficult to read in page source form.
3206:
1796:
1788:
1359:
836:
799:
766:
554:
386:
339:
271:
3156:'s talk page would be the easier option? That's the admin who gave the Pumpkins' discography page
2993:
removed the chart; I thought it was something I removed a while ago and you only just removed it.
2933:
had with users and letting it colour your future interactions with said user isn't very sensible.
3413:
3387:
3349:
3300:
3285:
3238:
3161:
3089:
3021:
2883:
2835:
2807:
2787:
2672:
2628:
2581:
2534:
2477:
2430:
2383:
2313:
2295:
2277:
2253:
2234:
2211:
2192:
2188:
2177:
2149:
2099:
2081:
2062:
2042:
2021:
1996:
1968:
1949:
1938:
1923:
1904:
1881:
1862:
1848:
1829:
1713:
1662:
1616:
1588:), and you agreed to perform another source review my way. Could I ask one for my new FAC? It is
1565:
1534:
1519:
1441:
1396:
1379:
1310:
1283:
1263:
1119:
1041:
1018:
substantial content, so you acting like you did me a favour when I didn't ask for it is strange.
967:
893:
818:
781:
738:
629:
569:
469:
425:
287:
207:
174:
87:
2995:
2968:
2935:
2853:
2509:
2358:
2220:
That wasn't me just plugging his latest record, by the way. It genuinely is cathartic as fuck. "
1804:
1171:
1060:
1020:
997:
991:
664:
246:
3219:
2688:
2558:
2454:
2411:
2407:
933:
881:
702:
316:
197:
151:
128:
3011:
Yeah, my bad. I was perusing some other album articles here on Wiki, looking for charts that
2921:
52:
Hi, responding to your message on my talk page, I've added references for those peaks now to
2870:
2286:
Wow. For a second there I thought you meant: "I inadvertently found a lot of information on
1505:
1427:
1341:
1328:
1134:
1092:
940:
671:
617:
609:
349:
302:
238:
231:
3192:
2224:. We'll burn it down. They won't even recognise your corpse!" As one of the reviews in the
1742:
1055:
873:
869:
621:
3434:
3421:
3395:
3380:
3357:
3313:
3293:
3269:
3242:
3227:
3213:
3169:
3146:
3130:
3097:
3055:
3029:
3006:
3000:
2979:
2973:
2946:
2940:
2891:
2864:
2858:
2821:
2795:
2760:
2680:
2660:
2632:
2585:
2538:
2481:
2434:
2387:
2317:
2303:
2281:
2257:
2242:
2215:
2200:
2181:
2157:
2107:
2085:
2070:
2046:
2029:
2000:
1972:
1957:
1942:
1927:
1912:
1885:
1870:
1852:
1833:
1773:
1721:
1705:
1684:
1670:
1644:
1624:
1601:
1573:
1557:
1542:
1449:
1435:
1404:
1314:
1291:
1267:
1247:
1200:
1142:
1127:
1100:
1071:
1065:
1049:
1031:
1025:
1008:
1002:
975:
948:
901:
885:
840:
826:
803:
789:
770:
746:
731:
710:
645:
603:
577:
562:
477:
463:
433:
417:
390:
343:
295:
275:
215:
201:
182:
155:
135:
95:
80:
3046:
Hi. I found out Salon magazine article says "gushy pop song" does not means a pop genre.
2505:
2354:
1800:
1658:
1167:
963:
242:
2900:
added the chart on—two years ago—and thinking that establishes a precedent. It doesn't.
3200:
3142:
3126:
2842:
200 this year. Regardless of who's seen what and what is where, the Top Album Sales is
2229:
1491:
832:
811:
795:
762:
761:, how do I make good arguments and avoid something that is considered inappropriate? --
451:
405:
382:
377:
335:
330:
267:
262:
76:
1494:
said it was "We Know Where You Fucking Live", but maybe Manson just screams the extra
499:
Here are some relevant extracts from guides to best practice in piping and redirects:
3234:
2988:
2716:
2624:
2619:
2577:
2572:
2530:
2525:
2473:
2468:
2426:
2421:
2379:
2374:
2309:
2273:
2249:
2207:
2173:
2129:
2077:
2038:
1992:
1964:
1934:
1919:
1877:
1844:
1825:
1820:
1584:
Hi, you probably don't remember me, but you sought for my help in your previous FAC (
1306:
1259:
2725:
2615:
2600:
2568:
2521:
2464:
2449:
2440:
2417:
2393:
2370:
2350:
2342:
2141:
1816:
1365:
1230:
1215:
1183:
877:
593:
373:
358:
326:
258:
193:
164:
147:
3284:
couple of the articles above it, just to get it to the top of the queue finally.
1654:
1274:
861:
854:
534:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirect#Do_not_.22fix.22_links_to_redirects_that_are_not_broken
123:. While you are welcome to re-use Knowledge (XXG)'s content, here or elsewhere,
3386:
No problem. Will be a few days after New Years before I can get to it, though.
1111:
958:, but the source you've posted here clearly says "The 2008 dance-pop hit", and
777:
3369:
3261:. If I were to nominate it for GA status, would you be willing to review it?
2916:
200, you're just intending to showing that "Marilyn Manson was number two in
3138:
3122:
3066:
2710:
https://tabs.ultimate-guitar.com/m/marilyn_manson/killing_strangers_btab.htm
2668:
1115:
923:
919:
72:
1590:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/On the Job (2013 film)/archive1
2500:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
2349:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
1795:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
1162:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
237:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
2698:, but available elsewhere online, for example, on Ultimate Guitar itself
1298:
2553:
2402:
311:
107:
2955:
2877:, you not agreeing with something doesn't automatically make it wrong.
2736:
It doesn't look like the song's in 6/8 time, as the article now states.
1631:
2514:
2363:
2290:... so I re-nominated Jill Valentine at FAC." Don't do that to me. ;)
1809:
1176:
251:
68:
3253:
Hi Homeostasis07, I have recently radically changed the article for "
1615:
Poitín. So I'm in no state to do any serious editing right now. ;)
2783:
1466:
Stop spreading misinformation/threatening to false flag an account
115:
to Knowledge (XXG). It appears that you copied or moved text from
3108:
Hi, I noticed you have reverted a lot of recent vandalism on the
2642:
Genres listed at the top of UG reviews are never acceptable. See
2172:
kept an eye on the whole thing and knows what actually happened.
57:
3118:
1302:
995:
The page was stable for at least two weeks. Please leave it be.
1346:
Nice to see you back. ;) Although I really didn't do much with
25:
3081:. Cheers. I doubt pinging works with IPs but, what the heck:
3071:
the most beautiful songs of all time are classed as pop songs
3321:
3233:
Very happy to see this on the main page today. Congrats. :)
1301:, and also Discogs.com is not considered a reliable source (
3326:
Hi Homeostasis07, I have recently changed the article for "
3334:". Would you be interested in reviewing it for GA status?
102:
Copying within Knowledge (XXG) requires proper attribution
3117:. I have dealt with this vandal for just over a year on
954:
Hmm, interesting. I have no idea what's been going on at
680:
List of awards and nominations received by Marilyn Manson
626:
Knowledge (XXG):Today's featured article/January 15, 2017
3197:
Knowledge (XXG):Today's featured article/January 5, 2018
2226:
critical reception section I'm currently working on says
831:
Oh... No worries. :P And thanks for your compliments. --
689:
taking care of points and clarifying "a tricky question"
71:. You'd have to look through each one manually, though.
3153:
3073:. Pop isn't all Britney Spears nowadays, ya know. I've
2779:
2123:
2058:
2017:
2014:
2011:
1500:
1014:
758:
688:
439:
401:
3218:
Thank you for the article with the beautiful title! --
2871:
You clearly haven't been paying close enough attention
686:, for defining your user by contributions alone, for
1040:and your summaries. Now they speak for themselves.
442:. Have to keep an eye coz doing the same thing for
48:
The Corrs Australian chart peaks outside the top 50
3330:" in much the same way I changed the article for "
1903:better off just waiting to review during its FAC?
492:Hi Homeostasis07 - here's why I made that change.
2272:. Your comments would of course be most welcome.
670:Thank you for quality articles on albums such as
3322:"I Don't Like the Drugs (But the Drugs Like Me)"
3189:Holy Wood (In the Shadow of the Valley of Death)
3180:Holy Wood (In the Shadow of the Valley of Death)
1089:Holy Wood (In the Shadow of the Valley of Death)
1629:Just get on with it when you finally sober up.
1515:having it appear on the main page on January 15
3328:I Don't Like the Drugs (But the Drugs Like Me)
2912:, and this is not an unusual case—it made the
144:Knowledge (XXG):Copying within Knowledge (XXG)
3305:I fixed those problems. Thanks for the help!
1963:this nomination goes a bit more smoothly. :)
922:when it was created; now, it only appears as
8:
3426:Thanks for your kind words- Happy New Year!
1891:able to post comprehensive notes up to ref
1675:You tell me, you're the source reviewer...
505:Knowledge (XXG):Piped_link#When_not_to_use
169:. I've spent the last few days re-writing
3400:Cool! What Manson song should I do next?
1305:). Otherwise that article looks good. :)
876:, you could be blocked for edit warring.
864:and reverting three other editors is now
3040:Against All Odds (Take a Look at Me Now)
2565:for things which need to be addressed.
2414:for things which need to be addressed.
892:after discussion. WP:Overreaction much?
323:for things which need to be addressed.
1712:the entire thing done by Sunday night.
2557:. The article is close to meeting the
2406:. The article is close to meeting the
1762:(In the Shadow of the Valley of Death)
1653:: "The Game Changer". Can a page from
315:. The article is close to meeting the
3372:" for GA status. Are you interested?
2928:added, then it should stay out until
2896:You're pointing to one other article
939:Thanks for any help you can give me.
35:I can overneath the path of misery...
7:
2954:You're confusing 5music.co.tw with
69:http://pandora.nla.gov.au/tep/23790
1373:were the challenge. ;) And, yeah,
24:
3187:This is to let you know that the
3110:The Smashing Pumpkins discography
3104:TomWatkins1970 sock puppet vandal
1303:see many discussions on this here
676:The Innocence Mission discography
616:This is to let you know that the
3408:22:20, December 30, 2017 (UTC)
2606:Talk:The Golden Age of Grotesque
2599:
2563:Talk:The Golden Age of Grotesque
2552:
2513:
2448:
2401:
2362:
1808:
1741:
1630:
1214:
1175:
1110:have been transcribed by either
926:. However, there's a link to a
753:How to self-improve my arguments
663:
357:
310:
250:
106:
2846:a component sales chart of the
2766:Sorry for the delayed response
2749:Thanks for your consideration!
1517:. I plan on doing the same for
1133:good luck with the nomination!
1013:Sorry for another message, but
468:Yeah, I'll keep an eye out. ;)
3191:article has been scheduled as
2875:The Ride (Nelly Furtado album)
2222:We know where you fucking live
2071:01:10, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
2047:14:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
2030:01:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
2001:23:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
1501:pretty much solely responsible
841:23:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
827:22:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
780:, so I'm off to the duvet. ;)
620:article has been scheduled as
450:. Will you also lend an eye? —
121:Portrait of an American Family
58:http://i.imgur.com/EMFvLCc.png
1:
3422:23:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
3396:19:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
3381:14:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
3358:23:35, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
3343:14:20, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
3314:14:20, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
3294:23:05, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
3270:14:20, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
3214:14:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
3170:21:05, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
3147:12:33, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
3131:12:31, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
2669:numerous notable publications
2318:11:09, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
2304:23:47, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
2282:01:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
2258:12:29, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
2243:00:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
2216:22:25, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
2201:20:22, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
2182:09:21, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
2158:00:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
1973:02:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1958:00:07, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
1943:02:04, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
1751:The Featured Article Barnstar
1450:00:22, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
1436:20:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
646:14:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
604:01:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
3098:02:43, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
3056:18:12, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
3030:02:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
3007:01:11, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
2980:01:07, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
2947:04:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
2892:20:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
2873:. Just as was the case with
2865:04:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
2822:07:02, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
2796:19:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
2761:21:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
2687:Your reversion and edits to
1405:01:15, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
1335:) 23:51, November 26, 2017
804:01:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
790:01:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
771:01:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
711:08:38, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
488:The Hell Not Hallelujah Tour
3435:22:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
3243:10:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
3228:06:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
3063:the source you've mentioned
2924:, if I challenged material
2681:18:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
2667:writer who has written for
2661:17:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
2633:18:55, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
2612:to appear in Did you know.
2592:The Golden Age of Grotesque
2586:13:20, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
2545:The Golden Age of Grotesque
2539:10:40, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
2502:The Golden Age of Grotesque
2494:The Golden Age of Grotesque
2482:06:21, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
2461:to appear in Did you know.
2435:14:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
2388:03:21, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
2108:00:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
2086:09:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
2008:wanted to do a week earlier
1928:01:08, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
1913:19:04, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
1886:01:29, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
1871:22:35, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
1853:14:26, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
1834:14:21, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
1774:17:07, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
1722:17:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
1706:04:09, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
1685:03:35, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
1671:22:48, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
1645:04:00, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
1625:16:39, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
1602:04:34, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
1354:The Golden Age of Grotesque
1227:to appear in Did you know.
912:Hi, maybe you can help me.
370:to appear in Did you know.
125:Knowledge (XXG)'s licensing
3457:
3432:User talk:MagicatthemovieS
3406:User talk:MagicatthemovieS
3378:User talk:MagicatthemovieS
3340:User talk:MagicatthemovieS
3311:User talk:MagicatthemovieS
3267:User talk:MagicatthemovieS
2189:nice, cathartic rock music
1015:Where is this coming from?
448:Madonna albums discography
391:20:01, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
344:12:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
2960:This Google search result
2834:Per your edit summary on
2508:-status according to the
2357:-status according to the
2288:Resident Evil: Apocalypse
2265:Resident Evil: Apocalypse
1803:-status according to the
1747:
1740:
1315:11:50, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
1292:19:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
1268:02:32, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
1248:21:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
1221:Talk:Antichrist Superstar
1201:17:00, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
1170:-status according to the
1143:02:33, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
1128:21:56, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
1101:05:57, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
949:01:00, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
747:21:58, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
732:14:41, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
578:22:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
563:08:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
296:00:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
276:17:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
245:-status according to the
216:23:51, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
202:12:44, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
190:User:EranBot/Copyright/rc
183:23:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
156:00:08, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
96:23:01, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
81:03:29, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
3193:today's featured article
2720:continuous Dm harmony.
2551:has been placed on hold
2400:has been placed on hold
1574:18:11, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
1558:23:29, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
1543:22:18, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
1389:Background and recording
1072:17:41, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
1050:17:39, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
1032:17:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
1009:17:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
976:01:09, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
622:today's featured article
478:19:20, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
464:11:12, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
309:has been placed on hold
1478:) 21:03, July 6, 2017
1375:Beautiful Monsters Tour
1080:Music magazine articles
902:19:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
886:19:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
434:19:13, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
418:11:09, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
18:User talk:Homeostasis07
2096:single-purpose account
2059:came out of retirement
1841:my current peer review
1282:." What do you think?
817:Sorry for everything.
717:Sounds Good Feels Good
684:uploading cover images
2985:I only just realised
2614:Message delivered by
2567:Message delivered by
2559:good article criteria
2520:Message delivered by
2463:Message delivered by
2416:Message delivered by
2408:good article criteria
2369:Message delivered by
1815:Message delivered by
1523:eventually, and also
1490:, and thanks. I know
1393:Composition and style
1229:Message delivered by
1182:Message delivered by
985:(Nelly Furtado album)
372:Message delivered by
364:Talk:The Pale Emperor
325:Message delivered by
321:Talk:The Pale Emperor
317:good article criteria
257:Message delivered by
171:Marilyn Manson (band)
117:Marilyn Manson (band)
54:The Corrs discography
1275:a little pet project
1207:Antichrist Superstar
1164:Antichrist Superstar
1157:Antichrist Superstar
584:Personnel subheaders
3158:extended protection
2594:you nominated as a
2547:you nominated as a
2443:you nominated as a
2396:you nominated as a
2148:from FAC entirely.
1859:The High End of Low
1797:The High End of Low
1789:The High End of Low
1734:A barnstar for you!
1360:The High End of Low
1209:you nominated as a
778:freezin' my ass off
352:you nominated as a
305:you nominated as a
3368:I just nominated "
3013:Heaven Upside Down
2836:Heaven Upside Down
2830:Heaven Upside Down
2804:No delay noticed,
2504:you nominated for
2353:you nominated for
1799:you nominated for
1531:Heaven Upside Down
1520:Heaven Upside Down
1380:Heaven Upside Down
1166:you nominated for
1054:I'm well aware of
759:aren't appropriate
694:awesome Wikipedian
404:I have to say :( —
241:you nominated for
192:easier. Thanks, —
113:your contributions
3183:scheduled for TFA
2689:Killing Strangers
2654:
2622:
2575:
2528:
2471:
2455:Talk:Born Villain
2424:
2412:Talk:Born Villain
2377:
1823:
1779:
1778:
1237:
1190:
612:scheduled for TFA
402:quite problematic
380:
333:
265:
45:
44:
3448:
3428:MagicatthemovieS
3402:MagicatthemovieS
3374:MagicatthemovieS
3336:MagicatthemovieS
3307:MagicatthemovieS
3304:
3282:
3279:MagicatthemovieS
3263:MagicatthemovieS
3249:"Apple of Sodom"
3211:
3088:
3003:
2998:
2992:
2976:
2971:
2943:
2938:
2861:
2856:
2811:
2773:
2657:
2652:
2651:
2644:WP:ALBUM/SOURCES
2613:
2603:
2566:
2556:
2519:
2517:
2462:
2452:
2415:
2405:
2368:
2366:
2133:
1814:
1812:
1745:
1738:
1737:
1657:be considered a
1634:
1613:
1506:The Pale Emperor
1489:
1345:
1228:
1218:
1181:
1179:
1068:
1063:
1028:
1023:
1005:
1000:
853:Edit warring at
815:
691:
672:The Pale Emperor
667:
618:The Pale Emperor
610:The Pale Emperor
602:
598:
461:
460:
415:
414:
371:
361:
350:The Pale Emperor
324:
314:
303:The Pale Emperor
284:The Pale Emperor
256:
254:
239:The Pale Emperor
232:The Pale Emperor
168:
146:. Thank you. —
140:
134:
110:
38:
37:
36:
26:
3456:
3455:
3451:
3450:
3449:
3447:
3446:
3445:
3366:
3324:
3298:
3276:
3251:
3207:
3185:
3106:
3082:
3044:
3001:
2996:
2986:
2974:
2969:
2964:WP:SINGLEVENDOR
2941:
2936:
2859:
2854:
2832:
2805:
2767:
2692:
2655:
2649:
2640:
2638:Ultimate Guitar
2618:, on behalf of
2571:, on behalf of
2524:, on behalf of
2498:
2467:, on behalf of
2420:, on behalf of
2373:, on behalf of
2347:
2127:
2126:pisses me off,
1900:Cultural impact
1819:, on behalf of
1793:
1607:
1582:
1511:featured status
1483:
1468:
1339:
1255:
1240:Seraphim System
1235:Seraphim System
1233:, on behalf of
1193:Seraphim System
1188:Seraphim System
1186:, on behalf of
1160:
1116:Provider Module
1082:
1066:
1061:
1026:
1021:
1003:
998:
987:
964:reliable source
962:is obviously a
910:
866:WP:Edit warring
858:
809:
755:
724:123.136.112.221
720:
699:
698:
692:, - you are an
687:
668:
653:
614:
600:
594:
586:
490:
456:
452:
410:
406:
398:
376:, on behalf of
329:, on behalf of
261:, on behalf of
235:
162:
138:
132:
104:
50:
34:
33:
32:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3454:
3452:
3444:
3443:
3442:
3441:
3440:
3439:
3438:
3437:
3365:
3362:
3361:
3360:
3332:Apple of Sodom
3323:
3320:
3319:
3318:
3317:
3316:
3259:Marilyn Manson
3255:Apple of Sodom
3250:
3247:
3246:
3245:
3184:
3176:
3175:
3174:
3173:
3172:
3115:TomWatkins1970
3105:
3102:
3101:
3100:
3075:even seen this
3043:
3036:
3035:
3034:
3033:
3032:
2952:
2951:
2950:
2949:
2910:extremely high
2831:
2828:
2827:
2826:
2825:
2824:
2799:
2798:
2743:
2742:
2738:
2737:
2691:
2685:
2684:
2683:
2639:
2636:
2497:
2491:nomination of
2485:
2346:
2340:nomination of
2334:
2333:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2320:
2292:RE: Apocalypse
2260:
2230:Jill Valentine
2169:
2165:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2117:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2110:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1930:
1792:
1786:nomination of
1780:
1777:
1776:
1754:
1753:
1748:
1746:
1736:
1735:
1731:
1730:
1725:
1724:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1651:Rogue Magazine
1581:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1550:Blazingcrystal
1546:
1545:
1492:Charlie Hunnam
1486:Blazingcrystal
1472:Blazingcrystal
1467:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1254:
1251:
1159:
1155:nomination of
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1081:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
986:
980:
979:
978:
918:was listed as
909:
906:
905:
904:
857:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
754:
751:
750:
749:
719:
714:
662:
660:
655:
654:
652:
649:
613:
607:
585:
582:
581:
580:
555:Colonies Chris
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
538:
537:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
521:
518:
509:
508:
489:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
397:
394:
299:
298:
234:
230:nomination of
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:
111:Thank you for
103:
100:
99:
98:
49:
46:
43:
42:
39:
30:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3453:
3436:
3433:
3429:
3425:
3424:
3423:
3419:
3415:
3414:Homeostasis07
3410:
3409:
3407:
3403:
3399:
3398:
3397:
3393:
3389:
3388:Homeostasis07
3385:
3384:
3383:
3382:
3379:
3375:
3371:
3363:
3359:
3355:
3351:
3350:Homeostasis07
3347:
3346:
3345:
3344:
3341:
3337:
3333:
3329:
3315:
3312:
3308:
3302:
3301:Homeostasis07
3297:
3296:
3295:
3291:
3287:
3286:Homeostasis07
3280:
3274:
3273:
3272:
3271:
3268:
3264:
3260:
3256:
3248:
3244:
3240:
3236:
3232:
3231:
3230:
3229:
3225:
3221:
3216:
3215:
3212:
3210:
3204:
3203:
3198:
3194:
3190:
3182:
3181:
3177:
3171:
3167:
3163:
3162:Homeostasis07
3159:
3155:
3150:
3149:
3148:
3144:
3140:
3135:
3134:
3133:
3132:
3128:
3124:
3120:
3116:
3111:
3103:
3099:
3095:
3091:
3090:Homeostasis07
3086:
3085:183.171.181.4
3080:
3076:
3072:
3068:
3064:
3060:
3059:
3058:
3057:
3053:
3049:
3048:183.171.181.4
3041:
3037:
3031:
3027:
3023:
3022:Homeostasis07
3019:
3014:
3010:
3009:
3008:
3005:
3004:
2999:
2990:
2984:
2983:
2982:
2981:
2978:
2977:
2972:
2965:
2961:
2957:
2948:
2945:
2944:
2939:
2931:
2927:
2923:
2919:
2915:
2911:
2907:
2906:unusual cases
2903:
2899:
2895:
2894:
2893:
2889:
2885:
2884:Homeostasis07
2880:
2876:
2872:
2869:
2868:
2867:
2866:
2863:
2862:
2857:
2849:
2845:
2841:
2837:
2829:
2823:
2819:
2815:
2809:
2808:Homeostasis07
2803:
2802:
2801:
2800:
2797:
2793:
2789:
2788:Homeostasis07
2785:
2784:how it is now
2781:
2777:
2771:
2765:
2764:
2763:
2762:
2758:
2754:
2750:
2747:
2740:
2739:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2730:
2727:
2721:
2718:
2713:
2711:
2706:
2702:
2700:
2697:
2690:
2686:
2682:
2678:
2674:
2673:Homeostasis07
2670:
2665:
2664:
2663:
2662:
2659:
2658:
2645:
2637:
2635:
2634:
2630:
2626:
2621:
2617:
2611:
2607:
2602:
2597:
2593:
2588:
2587:
2583:
2579:
2574:
2570:
2564:
2560:
2555:
2550:
2546:
2541:
2540:
2536:
2532:
2527:
2523:
2516:
2511:
2507:
2503:
2496:
2495:
2490:
2486:
2484:
2483:
2479:
2475:
2470:
2466:
2460:
2456:
2451:
2446:
2442:
2437:
2436:
2432:
2428:
2423:
2419:
2413:
2409:
2404:
2399:
2395:
2390:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2376:
2372:
2365:
2360:
2356:
2352:
2345:
2344:
2339:
2335:
2319:
2315:
2311:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2296:Homeostasis07
2293:
2289:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2271:
2267:
2266:
2261:
2259:
2255:
2251:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2240:
2236:
2235:Homeostasis07
2231:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2218:
2217:
2213:
2209:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2198:
2194:
2193:Homeostasis07
2190:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2179:
2175:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2155:
2151:
2150:Homeostasis07
2147:
2143:
2138:
2131:
2125:
2109:
2105:
2101:
2100:Homeostasis07
2097:
2094:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2068:
2064:
2063:Homeostasis07
2060:
2055:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2044:
2040:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2022:Homeostasis07
2018:
2015:
2012:
2009:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1974:
1970:
1966:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1955:
1951:
1950:Homeostasis07
1946:
1945:
1944:
1940:
1936:
1931:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1905:Homeostasis07
1901:
1897:
1894:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1868:
1864:
1863:Homeostasis07
1860:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1822:
1818:
1811:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1791:
1790:
1785:
1781:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1761:
1757:For bringing
1756:
1755:
1752:
1749:
1744:
1739:
1733:
1732:
1727:
1726:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1714:Homeostasis07
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1663:Homeostasis07
1660:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1642:
1638:
1633:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1617:Homeostasis07
1611:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1566:Homeostasis07
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1535:Homeostasis07
1532:
1528:
1527:
1522:
1521:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1507:
1502:
1497:
1493:
1487:
1482:That's cool,
1481:
1480:
1479:
1477:
1473:
1465:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1442:Homeostasis07
1439:
1438:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1397:Homeostasis07
1394:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1381:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1367:
1362:
1361:
1356:
1355:
1349:
1343:
1337:
1336:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1284:Homeostasis07
1281:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1252:
1250:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1236:
1232:
1226:
1222:
1217:
1212:
1208:
1203:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1189:
1185:
1178:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1120:Homeostasis07
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1087:I noticed on
1085:
1079:
1073:
1070:
1069:
1064:
1057:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1042:Homeostasis07
1039:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1030:
1029:
1024:
1016:
1011:
1010:
1007:
1006:
1001:
993:
984:
981:
977:
973:
969:
968:Homeostasis07
965:
961:
957:
953:
952:
951:
950:
946:
942:
937:
935:
931:
930:
925:
921:
917:
913:
907:
903:
899:
895:
894:Homeostasis07
890:
889:
888:
887:
883:
879:
875:
871:
867:
863:
856:
852:
842:
838:
834:
830:
829:
828:
824:
820:
819:Homeostasis07
813:
807:
806:
805:
801:
797:
793:
792:
791:
787:
783:
782:Homeostasis07
779:
775:
774:
773:
772:
768:
764:
760:
752:
748:
744:
740:
739:Homeostasis07
736:
735:
734:
733:
729:
725:
718:
715:
713:
712:
708:
704:
697:
695:
690:
685:
681:
677:
673:
666:
661:
659:
650:
648:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
630:Mike Christie
627:
623:
619:
611:
608:
606:
605:
599:
597:
591:
583:
579:
575:
571:
570:Homeostasis07
567:
566:
565:
564:
560:
556:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
535:
531:
530:
522:
519:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
506:
502:
501:
500:
497:
493:
487:
479:
475:
471:
470:Homeostasis07
467:
466:
465:
462:
459:
455:
449:
445:
444:Like a Virgin
441:
437:
436:
435:
431:
427:
426:Homeostasis07
422:
421:
420:
419:
416:
413:
409:
403:
395:
393:
392:
388:
384:
379:
375:
369:
365:
360:
355:
351:
346:
345:
341:
337:
332:
328:
322:
318:
313:
308:
304:
297:
293:
289:
288:Homeostasis07
285:
280:
279:
278:
277:
273:
269:
264:
260:
253:
248:
244:
240:
233:
229:
225:
217:
213:
209:
208:Homeostasis07
205:
204:
203:
199:
195:
191:
186:
185:
184:
180:
176:
175:Homeostasis07
172:
166:
160:
159:
158:
157:
153:
149:
145:
137:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
101:
97:
93:
89:
88:Homeostasis07
85:
84:
83:
82:
78:
74:
70:
65:
61:
59:
55:
47:
31:
27:
19:
3367:
3364:"Coma White"
3325:
3252:
3220:Gerda Arendt
3217:
3208:
3201:
3186:
3178:
3107:
3045:
3018:WP:Mea culpa
3012:
2994:
2967:
2953:
2934:
2929:
2925:
2917:
2913:
2909:
2905:
2902:WP:CHARTMATH
2897:
2879:WP:CHARTMATH
2874:
2852:
2847:
2843:
2839:
2833:
2814:ClanCularius
2775:
2770:ClanCularius
2753:ClanCularius
2751:
2748:
2744:
2732:To wrap up:
2731:
2726:appoggiatura
2722:
2714:
2707:
2703:
2693:
2647:
2641:
2596:good article
2590:The article
2589:
2549:good article
2543:The article
2542:
2499:
2492:
2445:good article
2441:Born Villain
2439:The article
2438:
2398:good article
2394:Born Villain
2392:The article
2391:
2351:Born Villain
2348:
2343:Born Villain
2341:
2291:
2287:
2263:
2146:topic banned
2122:
1989:
1899:
1895:
1892:
1858:
1794:
1787:
1759:
1750:
1695:
1650:
1585:
1583:
1547:
1530:
1524:
1518:
1504:
1503:for getting
1495:
1469:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1378:
1370:
1366:Born Villain
1364:
1358:
1352:
1347:
1256:
1211:good article
1205:The article
1204:
1161:
1107:
1086:
1083:
1059:
1038:WP:OWNERSHIP
1019:
1012:
996:
988:
982:
959:
955:
938:
927:
914:
911:
859:
756:
721:
703:Gerda Arendt
700:
669:
657:
656:
615:
595:
592:- thanks. --
587:
553:
498:
494:
491:
457:
453:
443:
411:
407:
399:
396:Ray of Light
354:good article
348:The article
347:
307:good article
301:The article
300:
283:
236:
206:Understood.
129:edit summary
105:
66:
62:
51:
3209:talk to me?
2610:nominate it
2598:has passed
2459:nominate it
2447:has passed
2054:no interest
1766:Slightlymad
1698:Slightlymad
1677:Slightlymad
1655:Squarespace
1637:Slightlymad
1610:Slightlymad
1594:Slightlymad
1513:, and also
1428:Red marquis
1342:Red marquis
1329:Red marquis
1280:WP:Fansites
1225:nominate it
1213:has passed
1135:Famous Hobo
1093:Famous Hobo
941:Cloverboy19
862:Rebel Heart
855:Rebel Heart
368:nominate it
356:has passed
3370:Coma White
3160:. Cheers.
2904:says: "In
2137:WP:NOTHERE
2093:WP:NOTHERE
1592:. Thanks,
1112:MansonWiki
1084:Hi there,
956:Poker Face
934:Just Dance
916:Poker Face
908:Poker Face
628:. Thanks!
3202:Jimfbleak
3079:talk page
2914:Billboard
2848:Billboard
2840:Billboard
1760:Holy Wood
1586:Holy Wood
1526:Holy Wood
1348:Holy Wood
1253:Holy Wood
1108:Holy Wood
960:Billboard
929:Billboard
924:synth-pop
920:dance-pop
833:George Ho
812:George Ho
796:George Ho
763:George Ho
438:This was
383:Retrohead
378:Retrohead
336:Retrohead
331:Retrohead
268:Retrohead
263:Retrohead
3235:Freikorp
3154:BU Rob13
3137:decades.
2989:SnapSnap
2625:Freikorp
2620:Freikorp
2578:Freikorp
2573:Freikorp
2531:Freikorp
2526:Freikorp
2510:criteria
2474:Freikorp
2469:Freikorp
2427:Freikorp
2422:Freikorp
2380:Freikorp
2375:Freikorp
2359:criteria
2310:Freikorp
2274:Freikorp
2270:See here
2250:Freikorp
2208:Freikorp
2174:Freikorp
2130:Freikorp
2078:Freikorp
2039:Freikorp
1993:Freikorp
1965:Freikorp
1935:Freikorp
1920:Freikorp
1898:#93. ;)
1878:Freikorp
1845:Freikorp
1826:Freikorp
1821:Freikorp
1805:criteria
1764:to FA –
1635:Cheers,
1307:Freikorp
1299:MOS:HASH
1260:Freikorp
1172:criteria
992:WP:QUOTE
983:The Ride
651:Precious
638:contribs
400:Getting
247:criteria
2956:G-Music
2922:WP:BOLD
2616:Legobot
2569:Legobot
2522:Legobot
2465:Legobot
2418:Legobot
2371:Legobot
1817:Legobot
1580:Request
1496:fucking
1338:Thanks
1231:Legobot
1184:Legobot
878:Aspects
642:library
596:Jennica
374:Legobot
327:Legobot
259:Legobot
194:Diannaa
165:Diannaa
148:Diannaa
2918:actual
2656:editor
2604:; see
2453:; see
1219:; see
1056:WP:OWN
936:does.
874:WP:FfD
870:WP:FfD
682:, for
658:albums
440:bingo!
362:; see
136:copied
3257:" by
3020:. =(
2844:still
2778:from
2776:Say10
2717:drone
2653:music
2650:danny
2487:Your
2336:Your
1782:Your
1659:WP:RS
1151:Your
532:From
517:page.
503:From
226:Your
119:into
16:<
3418:talk
3392:talk
3354:talk
3290:talk
3275:Wow
3239:talk
3224:talk
3166:talk
3143:talk
3139:Nqr9
3127:talk
3123:Nqr9
3119:Bros
3094:talk
3052:talk
3026:talk
2888:talk
2818:talk
2792:talk
2780:this
2757:talk
2677:talk
2629:talk
2582:talk
2535:talk
2478:talk
2431:talk
2384:talk
2314:talk
2300:talk
2278:talk
2254:talk
2239:talk
2212:talk
2197:talk
2178:talk
2154:talk
2124:This
2104:talk
2082:talk
2067:talk
2043:talk
2026:talk
1997:talk
1969:talk
1954:talk
1939:talk
1924:talk
1909:talk
1882:talk
1867:talk
1849:talk
1830:talk
1770:talk
1718:talk
1702:talk
1681:talk
1667:talk
1641:talk
1621:talk
1598:talk
1570:talk
1554:talk
1539:talk
1476:talk
1446:talk
1432:talk
1401:talk
1391:and
1371:they
1363:and
1333:talk
1311:talk
1288:talk
1264:talk
1244:talk
1197:talk
1139:talk
1124:talk
1097:talk
1046:talk
972:talk
945:talk
898:talk
882:talk
837:talk
823:talk
808:Hey
800:talk
786:talk
767:talk
743:talk
728:talk
707:talk
678:and
634:talk
590:here
574:talk
559:talk
474:talk
430:talk
387:talk
340:talk
292:talk
272:talk
212:talk
198:talk
179:talk
152:talk
92:talk
77:talk
73:Nqr9
3067:pop
3002:112
2975:112
2942:112
2930:you
2926:you
2898:you
2860:112
2782:to
2623:--
2576:--
2529:--
2472:--
2425:--
2378:--
1896:#83
1893:#59
1824:--
1509:to
1385:HUD
1238:--
1191:--
1114:or
1067:112
1027:112
1004:112
640:-
446:on
381:--
334:--
266:--
161:Hi
142:at
3430:-
3420:)
3404:-
3394:)
3376:-
3356:)
3338:-
3309:-
3292:)
3265:-
3241:)
3226:)
3205:-
3168:)
3145:)
3129:)
3096:)
3054:)
3028:)
2997:Ss
2970:Ss
2966:.
2937:Ss
2890:)
2855:Ss
2820:)
2794:)
2759:)
2679:)
2671:.
2646:.
2631:)
2584:)
2537:)
2512:.
2506:GA
2489:GA
2480:)
2433:)
2386:)
2361:.
2355:GA
2338:GA
2316:)
2302:)
2280:)
2256:)
2241:)
2214:)
2199:)
2180:)
2156:)
2106:)
2084:)
2069:)
2045:)
2028:)
2016:;
2013:;
1999:)
1971:)
1956:)
1941:)
1926:)
1911:)
1884:)
1869:)
1851:)
1832:)
1807:.
1801:GA
1784:GA
1772:)
1720:)
1704:)
1683:)
1669:)
1643:)
1623:)
1600:)
1572:)
1556:)
1541:)
1448:)
1434:)
1403:)
1357:,
1313:)
1290:)
1266:)
1246:)
1199:)
1174:.
1168:GA
1153:GA
1141:)
1126:)
1099:)
1062:Ss
1048:)
1022:Ss
999:Ss
974:)
966:.
947:)
900:)
884:)
839:)
825:)
802:)
788:)
769:)
745:)
730:)
709:)
701:--
696:!
674:,
644:)
636:-
576:)
561:)
476:)
432:)
389:)
342:)
294:)
274:)
249:.
243:GA
228:GA
214:)
200:)
181:)
154:)
139:}}
133:{{
94:)
79:)
41:”
29:“
3416:(
3390:(
3352:(
3303::
3299:@
3288:(
3281::
3277:@
3237:(
3222:(
3164:(
3141:(
3125:(
3092:(
3087::
3083:@
3050:(
3042:"
3038:"
3024:(
2991::
2987:@
2886:(
2816:(
2810::
2806:@
2790:(
2772::
2768:@
2755:(
2675:(
2627:(
2580:(
2533:(
2476:(
2429:(
2382:(
2312:(
2298:(
2276:(
2252:(
2237:(
2210:(
2195:(
2176:(
2152:(
2132::
2128:@
2102:(
2080:(
2065:(
2041:(
2024:(
1995:(
1967:(
1952:(
1937:(
1922:(
1907:(
1880:(
1865:(
1847:(
1828:(
1768:(
1716:(
1700:(
1679:(
1665:(
1639:(
1619:(
1612::
1608:@
1596:(
1568:(
1552:(
1537:(
1488::
1484:@
1474:(
1444:(
1430:(
1426:-
1399:(
1344::
1340:@
1331:(
1309:(
1286:(
1262:(
1242:(
1195:(
1137:(
1122:(
1095:(
1044:(
970:(
943:(
896:(
880:(
835:(
821:(
814::
810:@
798:(
784:(
765:(
741:(
726:(
705:(
632:(
601:✿
572:(
557:(
536::
507::
472:(
458:B
454:I
428:(
412:B
408:I
385:(
338:(
290:(
270:(
210:(
196:(
177:(
167::
163:@
150:(
90:(
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.