22:
133:
347:
407:
576:
28:
298:, so also not reliable. If you take all that stuff out, a lot of the sources supporting the major content is gone. Psychology Today is more like the kind of thing you should be looking for - however, the mentions of this subject in reliable sources all seem to be passing mentions - they use the phrase once or twice, but don't talk about it in depth.
312:
Finally, I think the writing style could be tightened up. Phrases like 'Self-guilt is said to the devil inside your own mind' would be find in a piece of journalism, but they're not encyclopedic. Try to be strictly factual and dispassionate - boring, if you like - don't try and make the writing more
313:
interesting with creative comparisons. (If there was a reliable source that said it was like the devil inside your own mind, you could probably get away with making it a directly attributed quote - e.g. Dr Tim Smith has described self-guilt as being 'like the devil inside your own mind'.)
373:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
377:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
533:
309:- you need some reliable sources actually discussing self-guilt as a concept to demonstrate that it passes that threshold. Without that, any article will likely end up getting deleted.
34:
531:! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
628:
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
435:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
370:
521:
418:
359:
601:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply
422:
196:
449:
If you now believe the draft cannot meet
Knowledge (XXG)'s standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
287:
Hi - I wanted to give you some more extensive feedback on this article, and why I think you need to work on it a bit more before publishing.
263:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge (XXG)'s
421:
are not considered suitable for
Knowledge (XXG) unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in
597:
In accordance with our policy that
Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
294:, you'll see that blogs are not acceptable - that rules out radmavarix, theferrarinn, iqmatrix, tinybuddha and the like. Quora.com is
413:
394:
200:
90:
38:
97:
104:
using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
490:
85:
543:, a friendly space on Knowledge (XXG) where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! –
305:. If it's just a phrase that sources use in pieces of writing, but don't discuss in and of itself, then it's not notable per
188:
144:
122:
316:
I hope this is helpful. If you can find and add some better sourcing, let me know if you'd like me to take a look. Cheers
192:
45:
and I have been editing
Knowledge (XXG) for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on
363:
267:
and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
70:
65:
105:
290:
My main concern is that there is not very much in the way of reliable sourcing there. If you take a look at
114:
46:
629:
256:
101:
325:
276:
231:, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
598:
204:
50:
539:
466:
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
425:. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.
175:
591:
569:
450:
443:
398:
228:
220:
416:
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MJL was:
383:
151:
632:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
587:
354:
338:
140:
126:
211:
109:
42:
640:
537:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
317:
268:
171:
463:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
457:
56:
583:
467:
430:
306:
295:
264:
158:
379:
291:
242:
236:
232:
21:
302:
252:
248:
157:
While all constructive contributions to
Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be
550:
503:
301:
That brings me on to my next concern - I'm not certain whether or not the subject is
80:
636:
75:
520:
406:
61:
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
644:
582:
Hello, Hvnlytearss. It has been over six months since you last edited the
558:
511:
387:
330:
281:
214:
181:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
116:
545:
498:
27:
442:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
491:
Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors
574:
405:
131:
358:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge (XXG) according to
453:, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "
473:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
247:
Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
603:
483:
475:
352:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
199:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
164:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
446:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
635:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge (XXG)!
91:
Discover what's going on in the
Wikimedia community
371:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Unfuckupable
255:on Knowledge (XXG)). I've moved your draft to
602:
8:
360:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
423:independent, reliable, published sources
20:
170:notice, but please explain why in your
433:as it only receives a passing mention.
7:
427:The comment the reviewer left was:
71:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
412:Your recent article submission to
159:deleted for any of several reasons
147:because of the following concern:
14:
369:The article will be discussed at
227:An article you recently created,
519:
345:
26:
534:Articles for creation help desk
477:Articles for creation help desk
1:
37:, Hvnlytearss! Thank you for
25:Some cookies to welcome you!
645:15:20, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
437:when they have been resolved
265:general notability guideline
86:How to write a great article
203:allows discussion to reach
184:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
167:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
660:
559:02:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
512:02:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
195:exist. In particular, the
35:Welcome to Knowledge (XXG)
388:22:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
331:22:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
282:22:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
215:09:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
189:proposed deletion process
117:03:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
51:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
49:. You can also check out
362:or whether it should be
176:the article's talk page
96:Also, when you post on
579:
410:
155:
136:
31:
584:Articles for Creation
578:
414:Articles for Creation
409:
395:Articles for creation
201:articles for deletion
149:
145:proposed for deletion
135:
24:
568:Your draft article,
485:reviewer's talk page
604:edit the submission
590:page you started, "
393:Your submission at
259:(with a prefix of "
237:independent sources
223:moved to draftspace
580:
411:
253:central importance
193:deletion processes
137:
76:How to edit a page
39:your contributions
32:
565:
564:
246:
123:Proposed deletion
651:
624:
623:
618:
617:
612:
611:
606:
577:
570:Draft:Self-guilt
557:
548:
523:
516:
515:
510:
501:
488:
480:
462:
456:
451:Draft:Self-guilt
444:Draft:Self-guilt
349:
348:
323:
320:
274:
271:
262:
240:
186:
185:
169:
168:
134:
112:
60:
30:
659:
658:
654:
653:
652:
650:
649:
648:
621:
620:
615:
614:
609:
608:
607:and remove the
575:
573:
561:
546:
544:
514:
499:
497:
482:
474:
460:
454:
434:
426:
403:
350:
346:
343:
328:
321:
318:
279:
272:
269:
260:
225:
210:
197:speedy deletion
183:
182:
166:
165:
132:
130:
110:
54:
19:
12:
11:
5:
657:
655:
586:submission or
572:
566:
563:
562:
526:
524:
495:
494:
471:
468:may be deleted
464:
447:
429:Does not meet
428:
417:
404:
402:
391:
344:
342:
337:Nomination of
335:
334:
333:
326:
314:
310:
299:
296:user-generated
288:
277:
224:
218:
208:
207:for deletion.
187:will stop the
129:
120:
102:sign your name
94:
93:
88:
83:
78:
73:
68:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
656:
647:
646:
642:
638:
633:
631:
626:
605:
600:
595:
593:
589:
585:
571:
567:
560:
556:
554:
549:
542:
541:
536:
535:
530:
525:
522:
518:
517:
513:
509:
507:
502:
492:
487:
486:
479:
478:
472:
469:
465:
459:
452:
448:
445:
441:
440:
438:
432:
424:
420:
415:
408:
400:
396:
392:
390:
389:
385:
381:
375:
372:
367:
365:
361:
357:
356:
340:
336:
332:
329:
324:
315:
311:
308:
304:
300:
297:
293:
289:
286:
285:
284:
283:
280:
275:
266:
258:
254:
250:
249:verifiability
244:
238:
234:
230:
222:
219:
217:
216:
213:
212:Jake Brockman
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
179:
177:
173:
162:
160:
154:
153:
148:
146:
142:
128:
124:
121:
119:
118:
115:
113:
111:CrispyCream27
107:
103:
99:
92:
89:
87:
84:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
62:
58:
52:
48:
44:
43:CrispyCream27
40:
36:
29:
23:
16:
634:
627:
616:{{db-draft}}
596:
581:
552:
538:
532:
528:
505:
484:
476:
436:
376:
368:
355:Unfuckupable
353:
351:
341:for deletion
339:Unfuckupable
226:
191:, but other
180:
172:edit summary
163:
156:
150:
141:Unfuckupable
139:The article
138:
127:Unfuckupable
95:
66:Introduction
47:my talk page
33:
529:Hvnlytearss
100:you should
622:{{db-g13}}
610:{{db-afc}}
592:Self-guilt
419:Neologisms
401:(August 3)
399:Self-guilt
380:Praxidicae
257:draftspace
229:Self-guilt
221:Self-guilt
152:WP:NOTDICT
106:Wikipedian
98:talk pages
81:Help pages
630:this link
599:mainspace
481:, on the
327:(blether)
278:(blether)
209:pseudonym
205:consensus
143:has been
540:Teahouse
233:reliable
53:or type
17:Welcome!
637:Bkissin
625:code.
527:Hello,
489:or use
458:db-self
364:deleted
303:notable
57:help me
41:. I am
431:WP:GNG
322:Summit
307:WP:GNG
273:Summit
261:Draft:
251:is of
174:or on
619:, or
588:Draft
319:Girth
292:WP:RS
270:Girth
641:talk
594:".
553:Talk
506:Talk
384:talk
547:MJL
500:MJL
125:of
108:!
643:)
613:,
461:}}
455:{{
439:.
397::
386:)
366:.
239:.
235:,
178:.
161:.
59:}}
55:{{
639:(
555:‐
551:‐
508:‐
504:‐
496:–
493:.
470:.
382:(
245:)
243:?
241:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
