Knowledge

User talk:Icantfindit

Source 📝

321: 162: 527: 250: 221: 466:
in Knowledge. You are not absolutely barred from writing about your own organisation but you do need to be open about this, and careful. If I can be of any help reply here and I or another fellow-editor will pick it up. I do understand that this seems mindlessly bureaucratic but the systems do make
45:
To reduce the chances of deletion, you might like to draft your article before submission, then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the
433:, but unfortunately, that doesn't mean the material can be copied to a Knowledge article. Assuming you wrote the material on behalf of King's College, it is now on their website. They have a copyright notice (which isn't even required, they would still have copyright without it). 631:
Glad you're not put off by the red tape! When you're ready, make a start on the article in the userspace page that I linked for you above, and if you want help leave a note here on on any of our talk pages. I have no doubt the Centre is
367:
Hi, I don't know what you need to help with but if it is the article which was nominated for speedy deletion, you can avoid its deletion by placing {{hang on}} in top of it, it seems that there is copyright violation in your article.
47: 462:. You will have to rewrite what you want to say, I'm afraid, to make it different to the text from your own website. Try using an article from one of the other centres as a model. Do also have a look at this article on 644:
isn't bad as it's from a reliable external source, even though the author is from King's. If you can find more sources to cite there will be no problem and I'll be happy to help drafting too so you can avoid the
284:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Knowledge must require all contributors to understand and comply with its
649:
worries of drafting alone. I guess you have a file of newspaper clippings etc (they don't have to be available on the www though that helps of course) and that will be a great place to start. Good luck!
467:
sense and are there for a reason. Regular editors will apply the rules strictly, as I am, but will also try and be genuinely helpful to new contributors acting in good faith, so don't be afraid to ask!
542:
policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should
458:
points out above, we can't accept copyright material - even from its author! What I'd suggest is that you start a page in your user space here (click red link to start the page)
616:
Thanks this is helpful - I'll try and rewrite it in a more neutral way. I do understand why this needs to be done, and am impressed by the diligence of the Wiki editors!
42:
and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been reverted for this very reason.
383:
I'm happy for the page to be edited/reviewed by Knowledge - the wording is the same as on the CeRch website because I wrote both - I was updating what became of the
199:
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the
176:
text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from
230: 414:- and at the moment we are the only one in the UK that is not listed, although others at King's College London are, as well as some of our projects. 487: 128: 70: 46:
page you created has already been deleted from Knowledge, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask
189: 112: 53:
The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately
131:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out
340: 132: 384: 28: 586: 539: 514: 530:
Welcome to Knowledge. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Knowledge in
535: 270: 88:
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
637: 561:
articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
275: 238: 212: 97: 23: 601: 490:
article explains how you can donate copyrighted materials - frankly, I suspect rewriting your material may be easier!
244:
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to
62: 531: 193: 181: 169: 155: 568: 459: 294: 266: 201: 185: 117: 58: 34:
I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a
656: 496: 473: 302: 144: 136: 594: 590: 92: 237:
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at
124: 617: 415: 518: 454:
Hello there, I'm going to delete the userpage where you started the draft of your article because as
443: 357: 353: 286: 173: 651: 608: 600:
For information on how to contribute to Knowledge when you have a conflict of interest, please see
491: 468: 298: 140: 585:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to
344: 107: 387:. Also trying to change my username but managed to put in a request now - I'm new to all this! 392: 54: 411: 327: 196:
has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
455: 438: 400: 373: 80: 641: 410:
Ok ... so what should I do? Knowledge has a Digital Humanities Centers category page at
74:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type 605: 578: 39: 260: 646: 463: 102: 35: 320: 211:
If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at
57:. It is also worth noting that Knowledge generally does not allow editors to have 640:
which is great as it's an entirely independent article from a news organisation.
633: 577:
to the Knowledge article or website of your organization in other articles (see
396: 369: 289:. Knowledge takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators 61:. If your username does have such a name, it would be advisable for you to 38:. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a 658: 625: 611: 498: 475: 449: 423: 404: 377: 361: 306: 148: 526: 395:
the fact you wrote both does not give wikipedia copyright to use it
59:
usernames which specifically link them to one company or corporation
571:
about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
430: 177: 636:, you just need the references to prove it. For example I found 436:
Sorry, relatives arriving, will respond in more detail later.--
315: 160: 412:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Digital_Humanities_Centers
68:
If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
519:
Knowledge:User pages#What may I not have in my user pages?
429:
I understand that you may have written the material at
332: 205:(CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following: 339:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their 330:has been answered. If you need more help, you can 602:our frequently asked questions for organizations 202:Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 8: 331: 241:with a link to where we can find that note. 172:, please note that Knowledge cannot accept 123:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 231:Knowledge:Requesting copyright permission 50:and they will copy it to your user page. 215:and send an email with the message to 168:Hello. Concerning your contribution, 7: 274:, and note that you have done so on 534:or other articles, you may have a 507:FYI conflict of interest guideline 276:Talk:Centre for e-Research (CeRch) 239:Talk:Centre for e-Research (CeRch) 213:Talk:Centre for e-Research (CeRch) 14: 133:Knowledge:Where to ask a question 525: 385:Arts and Humanities Data Service 319: 248: 219: 538:. In keeping with Knowledge's 178:http://www.kcl.ac.uk/iss/cerch 1: 659:19:26, 26 November 2010 (UTC) 626:10:21, 26 November 2010 (UTC) 612:06:16, 26 November 2010 (UTC) 532:Centre for e-Research (CeRch) 499:23:14, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 476:23:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 450:18:47, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 424:17:34, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 405:16:38, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 378:16:26, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 362:16:17, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 307:16:04, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 194:Centre for e-Research (CeRch) 182:Centre for e-Research (CeRch) 170:Centre for e-Research (CeRch) 156:Centre for e-Research (CeRch) 149:16:03, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 93:The five pillars of Knowledge 591:verifiability of information 180:. As a copyright violation, 113:How to write a great article 63:request a change of username 460:User:Icantfindit/cerchdraft 343:, or consider visiting the 297:from editing. Thank you. 71:New contributors' help page 675: 515:Knowledge is not a soapbox 249: 220: 621: 419: 259:a postal message to the 190:speedy deletion criteria 154:Copyright problems with 184:appears to qualify for 55:be blocked from editing 21:Hello, Annaashton, and 548:exercise great caution 165: 587:neutral point of view 540:neutral point of view 431:Centre for e-Research 164: 48:anyone from this list 569:deletion discussions 536:conflict of interest 464:conflict of interest 334:ask another question 261:Wikimedia Foundation 139:. Again, welcome! 36:conflict of interest 24:welcome to Knowledge 263:permitting re-use 166: 98:How to edit a page 29:your contributions 604:. Thank you. – 351: 350: 336:on your talk page 233:for instructions. 666: 654: 529: 494: 471: 448: 446: 441: 338: 323: 316: 287:copyright policy 255: 253: 252: 251: 226: 224: 223: 222: 163: 86: 85: 79: 27:! Thank you for 674: 673: 669: 668: 667: 665: 664: 663: 652: 595:autobiographies 509: 492: 469: 444: 439: 437: 314: 247: 245: 218: 216: 161: 159: 118:Manual of Style 83: 77: 76: 19: 12: 11: 5: 672: 670: 662: 661: 653:Kim Dent-Brown 583: 582: 579:Knowledge:Spam 572: 562: 523: 522: 508: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 493:Kim Dent-Brown 481: 480: 479: 478: 470:Kim Dent-Brown 434: 408: 407: 381: 380: 349: 348: 341:user talk page 324: 313: 310: 299:Invitrovanitas 282: 281: 280: 279: 246:permissions-en 242: 235: 217:permissions-en 158: 152: 141:Invitrovanitas 129:sign your name 121: 120: 115: 110: 105: 100: 95: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 671: 660: 657: 655: 648: 643: 639: 635: 630: 629: 628: 627: 623: 619: 614: 613: 610: 607: 603: 598: 596: 592: 588: 580: 576: 573: 570: 566: 565:participating 563: 560: 556: 553: 552: 551: 549: 545: 541: 537: 533: 528: 521: 520: 516: 511: 510: 506: 500: 497: 495: 489: 485: 484: 483: 482: 477: 474: 472: 465: 461: 457: 453: 452: 451: 447: 442: 435: 432: 428: 427: 426: 425: 421: 417: 413: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 389: 388: 386: 379: 375: 371: 366: 365: 364: 363: 359: 355: 346: 342: 337: 335: 329: 325: 322: 318: 317: 311: 309: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 277: 273: 272: 268: 262: 258: 254:wikimedia.org 243: 240: 236: 234: 232: 225:wikimedia.org 214: 210: 209: 208: 207: 206: 204: 203: 197: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 157: 153: 151: 150: 146: 142: 138: 135:or ask me on 134: 130: 126: 119: 116: 114: 111: 109: 106: 104: 101: 99: 96: 94: 91: 90: 89: 87: 82: 73: 72: 66: 64: 60: 56: 51: 49: 43: 41: 37: 32: 30: 26: 25: 16: 615: 599: 584: 574: 564: 558: 554: 547: 543: 524: 512: 409: 391:Please read 382: 352: 333: 328:help request 312:help needed! 290: 283: 264: 256: 228: 200: 198: 167: 137:my talk page 122: 75: 69: 67: 52: 44: 33: 22: 20: 618:Icantfindit 416:Icantfindit 174:copyrighted 513:see also: 456:Sphilbrick 440:SPhilbrick 354:Annaashton 265:under the 188:under the 125:Wikipedian 103:Help pages 606:Athaenara 127:! Please 642:this one 559:creating 345:Teahouse 267:CC-BY-SA 186:deletion 108:Tutorial 634:notable 575:linking 555:editing 295:blocked 40:neutral 17:Welcome 593:, and 550:when: 81:helpme 544:avoid 397:Petrb 370:Petrb 326:This 638:this 622:talk 517:and 488:This 486:PS: 420:talk 401:talk 393:this 374:talk 358:talk 303:talk 291:will 271:GFDL 269:and 229:See 145:talk 647:COI 567:in 557:or 546:or 293:be 624:) 609:✉ 597:. 589:, 581:). 422:) 403:) 376:) 360:) 305:) 257:or 227:. 192:. 147:) 84:}} 78:{{ 65:. 31:. 620:( 445:T 418:( 399:( 372:( 356:( 347:. 301:( 278:. 143:(

Index

welcome to Knowledge
your contributions
conflict of interest
neutral
anyone from this list
be blocked from editing
usernames which specifically link them to one company or corporation
request a change of username
New contributors' help page
helpme
The five pillars of Knowledge
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign your name
Knowledge:Where to ask a question
my talk page
Invitrovanitas
talk
16:03, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Centre for e-Research (CeRch)
Centre for e-Research (CeRch)
copyrighted
http://www.kcl.ac.uk/iss/cerch
Centre for e-Research (CeRch)
deletion
speedy deletion criteria

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.