2948:, thanks for your reply and I'm really glad to see you've now renominated the entry for AfD in lieu of a redirect. When an AfD closes in a way we disagree with, it's really essential that we engage community process to handle it (whether deletion review request or a follow-up AfD later on), rather than overrule it unilaterally--the latter doesn't lead anywhere good! To that point, if I may make a friendly suggestion--this one's not required by policy, but you might consider leaving questions like mine up on your talk page rather than selectively deleting them. It goes a long way to make clear to all these were good faith edits you're willing to discuss openly toward developing community consensus, rather than trying to impose your own view. Actually, feel free, if you like, to add a link to this discussion so folks can see it got sorted out! Thanks again for replying.
1940:: on the contrary, I was trying to acknowledge what I've heard you say repeatedly about how few people you feel read directions, so it honest-to-god made sense to me that you might prefer not to work on something you think people won't read anyway! I was really saying I thought I understood where you were coming from even if I saw it differently. As for "the point which I have tried so patiently and politely to explain, but which you shrugged off as off topic"--I'm honestly not following? But in any case I thank you for encouraging me to be bold in trying to improve concision of instructions; as I've mentioned elsewhere I am very aware of the deep seriousness and sheer volume of your investment and experience in the project, so it's very helpful, not to mention heartening, to have your assessment that I could contribute usefully on this front.
1905:, yup I agree it's worrying how many people are getting it wrong. I suppose I'm hopeful I might be able to help specifically as someone who learned this procedure very recently, and has a fresh memory of what I couldn't decipher despite best efforts! Now that it has been explained to me in plainer terms, I can see the items I didn't understand are technically already in the text (which is good, no policy change required!) but I do think the phrasing is unnecessarily opaque and we could do better. (Strikes me as a particular example of a divide between the plain, clear language we require for mainspace articles, versus not necessarily holding policy pages to same standard for accessibility.) Tonight or this weekend I'll hop over to talk page and mention a couple things that particularly come to mind.
2020:
fair debate. Debate is not fair however when the arguments are based on the personalities of the participants or on contrived rationale. Editors like you who show a genuine interest in the
Knowledge (XXG) 'back office' are very much needed, especially when their comments and suggestions can be based on fact rather than conjecture, and presented objectively. Their opinions will garner a lot of respect. If you're interested. when the current RfC is over, I'd be happy to go through it (and/or its precursor) with you and point out which votes (on either side) make sense, which ones additionally make a significant impact on the outcome, which ones a closing admin will dismiss as trolling, and the character of the people behind them.
2797:
1886:
read instructions. I disagree with this view (in part because every single time you've suggested I did not read the instructions or preliminary materials, you were mistaken), so I consider it worth my time to try to improve clarity of instruction, and more generally try to bring the same care to how we lay out information in policy pages as we do for how we organize information in mainspace. But I understand entirely why the effort might not interest you, given your differing view of the underlying problem, and I don't mean at all to try to persuade you it is how you should spend your time. Certainly, no shortage of things to work on!
1922:
horrendously verbose which leads to lack of clarity, but please don't hint at me how I should refocus the 60+ hours a week I spend on
Knowledge (XXG). One of the reasons our instructions are so verbose, even TL;DR, is because many people like to see themselves in print (not to be confused with informal discussions on talk pages). I acknowledge and admire your efforts to look into these things, and if I had the time, I would actively assist you; be bold, do whatever you think necessary to render any parts of Knowledge (XXG) more succinct. You have my support.
2301:, I see unfortunately the page has been deleted; it's probably because no additional references had been added. I think at this point my advice for you would be get some practice editing other parts of Knowledge (XXG) to get the hang of things, before trying to restart this entry. It's a much easier way to get proficient with using the site; as you've seen, starting a new entry can be tricky, and it's only more complicated once the topic's already been through community discussion for deletion. Working on some less complicated tasks first can help demystify things--you could start with the
2109:
1573:
3186:
1777:, although it might become useful when Innisfree volunteers to train our new, super-qulified New Page Reviewers. The conditions for the use of BLPPROD could not be clearer - I know, because I drew the enormous RfC for its creation to its successful conclusion 7 years ago. The reasons are twofold: 1. avoid discussion over what links might be a source or a reliable source, and 2. post the template quickly while the creator is still logged in.I'll add your essay to a few related essays, tutorials, and advice pages.
1580:
1120:: Sorry about the delay in getting back to you. I have been busy outside of Knowledge (XXG). I see that you did de-prod the article as you said that they was coverage from reliable sources in your edit summary, but you didn't add any of them. I'm willing to restore the article into your user space so that you can work on it, but it really needs reliable sources before it can go back into main space. All of the sources are either his own YouTube videos, his Twitter, or famousbirthdays.com.
2116:
939:--and therefore that Knowledge (XXG) was better served by keeping. The group didn't agree with me which is fine, but I don't think I was making an argument that was out of line with the principles.) So if you could give me some more concrete guidance on what I'm overlooking, that'd be very helpful. Or for that matter I'm willing to remove my name from the list if there's concern about me participating. It's fine; I have other things I'm happy to work on instead. Thanks for your help!
3118:
3232:
31:
1466:
1987:!voters. In the extreme, persistent participation in a manner in which I'm fast beginning to recognise as a pattern could be broadly construed as disruptive. But all it would achieve is my retirement from Knowledge (XXG), not that anybody cares, or me even - I've achieved most of the major changes I fought for for years here, and I written a fair few articles, and helped many new editors into their Wikicareers.
1749:
despite the clarity, still think BLPPROD means no reliable sources, rather than just no sources. It may seem strange, but there is a reason for the "double standard": it can sometimes be difficult to judge the reliability of sources. I've actually been told off for removing BLPPROD tags from articles where it shouldn't have been placed because there was already at least one source when it was placed. Several weeks ago, I wrote
633:
846:
1193:
441:
2676:
2867:
2165:
1616:
501:
269:
2974:
927:, thanks for your message. I'd welcome any specific feedback you have about what policies and guidelines I might profit from reviewing, as in truth I had the impression my editing history suggests I am pretty conversant in the guidelines and policies: I've created 21 new entries that have been reviewed as acceptable; only one of the entries I've created has been sent to AfD, and it was
2005:; I definitely did not see my participation in this light. I care about the encyclopedia and spoke up only because I have concerns for how this reform could affect the pool of reviewers, and consequently the new contributors they interact with. But I certainly had no desire to be a source of disruption so I'm willing to strike my RfC comments if you'd like.
2592:
676:
1868:
high sign pointing to the moving walkway for all the B gates. One other problem is that we are reluctant to protect important pages and templates again arbitrary changes by clueless drive-by users. These are all reasons why we are having to control who can patrol new pages - something that
Innisfree oddly appears not to be ready to support.
1797:, thanks so much for reaching out! Yes my sense is those of us without the benefit of Kudpung's extensive context for the project often are not finding the instructions nearly so self-evident (I know I read those specific instructions three times and still got it wrong), and the resulting friction isn't pleasant for anyone! (Though
1246:
but will be more tools towards increasing bulk output in overall goal. It's a permanent goal now, and open! I would be grateful if you could keep a record of all your articles you do there, as I really think seeing the combined efforts will encourage others to create more content too! Please spread the word to the others, cheers!âĶ
1145:--yes I have references from The Washington Post, MTV, Chicago Tribune, etc. that I now realize I should've saved to the talk page at least, if I wasn't going to enter them just then. I was pretty new and unaware of that option. So great, yes if you'd post the non-vandalized version to my user space that'd be great. Thanks.
882:. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!!
824:. Yes, was led astray by the requirement for a reliable source to de-PROD in BLPs, but now I understand. (It is odd!) In any case yes I am quite sure there are reliable sources for this one--my concern was only for leaving up an unreliably-sourced BLP, so, thanks also for getting the ball rolling on remedying that.
1802:
but I'm wondering if we could find some plain language that would make the policy itself clearer to newcomers; if group can't agree then I do think an essay is the way to go, just hopeful we might find a way to clarify without adding to reading necessary to execute the task properly. Thanks again for reaching out!
2227:
Or another idea just came to mind: if you'd rather have more time, you can leave a note on the entry's talk page asking that an admin convert this to a draft for you. That way you can work on it for as long as you want without having to worry that it'll be deleted at any moment. And, once you finish,
1845:), but the confusion still exists. I'm all for making it clear, but I don't see how much clearer it can be. It could well be that people are simply not reading the page properly. If that's the case, I really don't know what to do. In fact, only a couple of months ago, the prob blp template itself was
1801:
was the model of collegiality and clarity in steering me back to the right track, for which I am very grateful.) If others might be interested in discussing as well, want to meet over at the talk page to continue? I agree that the couple of words I added really aren't sufficient to solve the problem
1245:
Hello. I've revamped the contest page into this, based on the new
British model. Long term goal, but I've added entries since the beginning of July to give it some initial life. Please add anything you've done then this then too! I hope it proves productive long term. The contests are still planned,
804:
references covering the information. Even if it has an unreliable source, that means you're not to BLPPROD it. (People are often confused by this, because once a BLPPROD has been put properly into place, it takes a reliable source to un-PROD it.) I have removed the BLPPROD... and then went and put a
2501:
in the nominations... your article is about a person who hits four problem categories: 1) A woman, 2) A person whose prominence arose in the pre-Google era, 3) A non-English-speaking person, and 4) A left-wing political figure. The best you can do is to add more source material (print material
2019:
The RfC will probably pass. Your vote won't make much difference at this stage and most RfC that are well researched, well presented, and which propose logically needed new policies or software, will get a consensus. Nobody minds opposition, even when an important RfC does fail, it's the nature of
1867:
for 9 years for a higher degree), is that you cn give people the best instructions and they still won't bother to read them (leading horses to water?) - only last week someone in the airport asked me the way to Gate B4 for the flight to Udon Thani and we were standing right next to the 1 metre
1840:
getting it wrong. One of the reasons I wrote the essay is so I don't have to keep explaining the same stuff again each time someone tells me not to remove BLPPROD tags without adding a reliable source, even when the article didn't meet the placement requirement. Others have tried making it clear in
1753:
detailing the common BLPPROD mistakes I encounter. What do you think? I don't normally "advertise" my essays (I haven't even put a link on the policy page, though if anyone does want to put a link there, I won't object), but in this case I wanted to make you aware in case you aren't already, as you
1748:
I noticed you recently added some clarification to the policy page on BLPPROD, and were talking about proposing a revision to the wording on the talk page. Sadly, I don't think the former will help, but thanks for trying anyway. The wording is clear to me, but I've encountered a lot of editors who,
1063:
thanks for checking in! I definitely agree the author should have an entry (he recently won a
Guggenheim for a different project) and plan to make one; based on my acquaintance with the sources, I'm inclined to think Practice of Diaspora is enough of a "big book" in the field that it's worth having
2907:
As I explained in my deltion nomination, having an article on Snow goes against the consensus on candidates for elected office. We need extremely good sourcing, that is better than passing mention but shows study of the candidate as a candidate by many sources. This is lacking on the part of Snow.
2532:
of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good
1885:
I'd appreciate it if we could please keep this thread focused on BLPPROD (if you have a specific NPP query for me, you could start a separate thread or add it to the post above about the working group.) For BLPPROD. I understand your view that a large percentage of WP problems is that people don't
2540:
can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page
Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.
1089:
With one book, it's equivocal whether to make the article on the book or the author. (he's ed. of a few collections, but I don't see any other books authored ). My view is that it's best at the author, because the author is likely to write more books, so the article will be expandable. As for an
1986:
I don't think you need to know anything more at the moment except to adopt a more collegial and collaborative approach to
Knowledge (XXG). RfCs are not only a head count, the comments made are also taken into account by the closer and also greatly influence other potential
2926:
article is the main reason I think it makes absolutely no sense for
Knowledge (XXG) to have an article on Snow. It illustrates that despite holding a major party nomination for senate this was not at all a viable or noted campaign, and not the level of campaign that should be seen to give the
1954:
What I would strongly discourage you from however (which despite AGF also adds to the growing concern that some of your comments might be due to some personal bias), is taking text out of context or otherwise purporting it to say what it doesn't by rephrasing it in your
1690:
from
October 15 to November 27 which needs contributors. Before it starts contestants will be asked if they want articles done for it to also count towards the 10,000 challenge, and it's also a chance to win some prizes for contributing towards the whole range of countries, so sign up at the
1264:
I was typing up about it when I got the revert, would it be appropriate to say this? (Yes there are references about this, I make sure by checking before saving my changes, and there is more references than provided here about his death. If you're wondering I go through and check articles in
1921:
Thank you, Innisfee, for so clearly illustrating the point which I have tried so patiently and politely to explain, but which you shrugged off as off topic. As an expert in communication, I am absolutely, totally aware of the fact that most of our instructions and template messages are
1691:
destubathon if interested! Even if not interested in prizes, there will be the focus on destubbing anyway and hopefully people can still be a part of it. For this there will be prizes for women destubs and new articles on women, but no stubs are permitted, minimum 1.5kb prose creations.âĶ
1509:
I've just noticed you've signed up as a member of Women in Red. That's great, given your high standard of editing and the articles you've recently created. I've added your name to our mailing list. You'll be kept informed of our activities. Just drop me a line if ever you run into any
2068:. Means a lot you'd offer to spend time helping me. Right now I think I better decline as I wouldn't want to waste your time, and at present I'm having doubts about whether back office work is something I'll continue. Thank you though. And congratulations on the RfC passing!
2224:! Yes, if you have more references, I would add them as soon as possible--because the topic's already been through community discussion once, if admins don't see significant additions beyond the already-discussed version, it'll be deleted again without further discussion.
953:
If I had thought you were a potential danger to the project I would have removed you from the list. I was just pointing out that 500 edits is a low threshold and that candidates for 'reviewer' are often subject to closer scrutiny. AfC is a troubled project Happy editing!
2279:, click edit, leave a note requesting the page be converted to a draft for you to work on, and then save changes. The admin who does it for you should leave a link on your talk page that you can follow. Hope that helps! If it still doesn't work, you may need to ask at
1123:
As for the double deletion, that is because after I deleted it the first time, a now blocked troll account decided to turn it into an attack page. It was those vandalism only edits that I alerted me to the article. Obviously, I will not be restoring those edits. --
907:
Hi. Thank you for enrolling as an AfC reviewer. Please however proceed with extreme caution as 500 mainspace edits is only the basis qualification and your editing history suggests you may still not be fully conversant with our policies and guidelines. Happy editing!
1709:
HI. Following 5 years of unstructured discussion, a dedicated venue has been created for combined discussion about NPP & AfC where a work group is also being composed to develop recommendations for necessary changes to policies and related software. It is
1385:, which is obviously the kind of error to be strenuously avoided), but maybe a viable solution would be to say something like, "On September 6, 2016, Seals was reportedly found dead inside a burning car." with the references you mention? What do you think?
1072:
about whether one notable book sufficed to confer notability on an author, as the book was judged notable but the author's page had been sent to AfD.) So if you have any thoughts to share, or can point me toward some reading on the matter, I'd be grateful!
2688:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
1219:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
467:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
2228:
you click the button to submit the draft and an experienced user will look it over and say if it meets criteria, or let you know what else you need to change before it can go live as a "mainspace" entry. That might be an easier way to do it!
2908:
Beyond that Snow was trounced in the election, and various issues that seem to have gained widespread attention in media reports were not at all brought up in the election process. The coverage is not enough to rise above one event coverage.
1955:
reported sources in in an attempt to substantiate your arguments. In some contexts such possible misrepresentations could be described as disingenuous. If you need diffs, I (and several others) would be happy to provide them.
935:(and for what it's worth, the two red cells on my record are both cases that I understood to be borderline for guidelines that offer presumptive notability, but I nevertheless felt we had enough to develop a reliable entry--per
206:
a specific guide for authors), the article may get deleted. (Let me just explain that - I'm aware that as a writer for Buzzfeed, this person probably publishes many articles a day. What's needed for notability is articles
3192:
Merry Christmas from me! Thanks for your company during 2016. We have seen the percentage of articles on women rise from 15.5% to 16.77%. 20% is within our grasp and that's an increase of 11% over what we first found.
2716:
1758:, who I see explained it to you originally) have shown signs of wanting to deal with this confusion, and this may help as people are still confused about the placement and removal requirements of the tag. Regards.
1223:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
1064:
an separate entry, but I'd actually love your guidance on policy for distinguishing between when an author should have a page, but not a book, or vice versa, or both should have pages. (It's been on my mind since
471:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
2770:
2747:
1417:
was being reported dead a week or so before he actually died. It's fine that you reverted to make sure it was the correct information, also sorry about responding late I'm doing some education stuff.
2700:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1662:
3134:
2613:
697:
3048:
I proposed tentative guidelines. You were one of the major advocates of broad posting when the subject was discussed earlier. I am not sure how to get any let alone broad attention for the post.
2525:
As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).
1433:
All good, really I thought it was a very efficient group effort to get something reliable in place quickly on an important and sensitive topic. I appreciate your contributions and collaboration
1327:
398:, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
400:
1687:
972:. If you have any specific trouble spots you think new reviewers should particularly be attentive to, I'd still be glad to hear them; in any event I'll certainly do my level best!
218:(ones not written by or for this person) you can add? If so just edit the article and add citations using the cite tool, or if you have any thoughts or questions just let me know.
1658:
854:
1480:" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on
1239:
2348:
We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
2506:
rules and only post something very neutral like "this discussion may be of interest to members of this project: and link it. Don't do it for this one, I'll do so for you
2246:
How would I go about getting into the page to edit? Both pages won't allow me to access them so I wouldn't know how to go about requesting it to be put back in a draft.
928:
464:
1302:
1381:, thanks so much for your work on this. So I was going to give a little while before I added just to be absolutely sure (I was recently reminded that some newsmedia
3016:
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
2769:
Hi Innisfree987. You are invited to comment at a further discussion on the implementation of this user right to patrol and review new pages that is taking place at
2746:
Hi Innisfree987. You are invited to comment at a further discussion on the implementation of this user right to patrol and review new pages that is taking place at
198:
Hello, thanks for writing this article! Iâve just read it and Iâm a bit concerned that it has no citations. That worries me since without proof that this person is
2883:
2852:
2842:
2832:
2826:
2181:
2152:
2142:
2136:
1632:
1602:
1598:
1216:
1065:
561:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
325:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
3045:
388:
2879:
2177:
1628:
1205:
453:
2995:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply
1834:
are perfectly clear to me. At least 2 editors who have told me off are experienced admins. That's quite shocking, and I find it rather worrying that
1042:
Wouldn't it make more sense to write about the author instead, and use this as a section? I can help you move it that title if you have any problems
114:
138:
145:
2991:
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
2330:
1723:
538:
306:
2861:
2159:
1610:
1069:
3093:
2796:
2730:
2568:
2041:
3074:
for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See
2261:
98:
2627:
2579:
711:
663:
488:
256:
3127:, for countless new entries for journalists, comedians, poets, for welcoming new users, for helping with articles for creation, for
2533:
faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.
3280:
3272:
3267:
890:
79:
71:
66:
2623:
707:
595:
359:
128:
3089:
2726:
2564:
2709:
410:, a friendly space on Knowledge (XXG) where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
133:
2305:, a game-like training tool that will walk you through the main aspects of how to use the site. Good luck and happy editing!
932:
2924:
1750:
3070:
are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on
1863:
One of the big problems on Knowledge (XXG) which is a worldwide human problem (I know, because I studied and researched
861:). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:
2485:
2471:
1209:
457:
2721:
1352:
1090:
article on the book as well, there's no consistent standard, but if it wins a major prize, there's a very good case.
2276:
3239:
1382:
38:
1572:
1485:
559:
My examinations and searches have still found nothing convincing for his own notability thus I would not resubmit.
3053:
2932:
2913:
1164:
2108:
858:
510:
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
119:
105:
753:
613:
183:
3185:
2697:
1936:
No hinting intended, I was fully, entirely sincere when I said I didn't mean to tell you to change your focus
2275:, that's odd that you can't access! Should work the same way leaving a note for me here works--you go to the
796:. I understand the belief that this page may not have been properly referenced, but as odd as it may sound,
477:
3017:
2358:
2353:
2249:
645:
Dear Innisfree987, thank you for your contributions to Knowledge (XXG), especially your recent creation of
203:
156:
3248:
3217:
3168:
3147:
2953:
2310:
2288:
2257:
2233:
2210:
2073:
2010:
1977:
1945:
1910:
1891:
1807:
1554:
1534:
1442:
1404:
1390:
1150:
1078:
1024:
977:
944:
829:
775:
47:
17:
2992:
2985:
2967:
2479:
2302:
1529:--I really appreciate the welcome. I'm looking forward to getting more involved in the community at WiR!
333:
260:
168:
3198:
3124:
1864:
160:
2363:
2280:
2115:
1579:
512:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Knowledge (XXG) requires
406:
280:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Knowledge (XXG) requires
149:
555:
sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Knowledge (XXG) at this time.
323:
sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Knowledge (XXG) at this time.
101:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
3049:
2945:
2928:
2909:
2529:
810:
569:
492:
278:
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
109:
2684:
2666:
2503:
1831:
797:
148:, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Knowledge (XXG). You can visit
2891:
2609:
2189:
1642:
1549:
I received your message and hope you will be able to direct me in editing my article. Thank you.
1172:
1129:
767:
741:
693:
601:
245:
223:
178:
3020:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
2693:
199:
2193:
1854:
1763:
1399:
Ah, I see another experienced user has added it as well now, so I defer to group wisdom on this.
646:
473:
3117:
3212:! This is a great bit of news--wonderful to start the new year with something hopeful. Thanks!
3044:
I just posted an intial draft of an idea for notability guidelines for beauty pageant winners.
167:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
3213:
3164:
3160:
3143:
2949:
2803:
2778:
2755:
2306:
2298:
2284:
2272:
2253:
2229:
2221:
2206:
2069:
2055:
2025:
2006:
1992:
1973:
1960:
1941:
1927:
1906:
1887:
1873:
1818:
1803:
1782:
1731:
1672:
1550:
1530:
1515:
1438:
1400:
1386:
1229:
1146:
1074:
1020:
1005:
973:
959:
940:
913:
825:
771:
404:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
2705:
2545:
2368:
1661:, the community will now establish the user right criteria. You may wish to participate in
936:
3209:
3194:
1692:
1247:
3085:
2981:
2708:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2701:
2553:
2549:
2537:
1481:
532:
528:
507:
300:
296:
275:
1798:
1755:
883:
821:
806:
517:
285:
215:
3221:
3202:
3172:
3151:
3097:
3057:
3034:
2957:
2936:
2917:
2895:
2782:
2759:
2734:
2660:
2572:
2512:
2502:
is OK). A person can also alert relevant wikiprojects, but you do have to be careful of
2314:
2292:
2265:
2237:
2214:
2077:
2059:
2029:
2014:
1996:
1981:
1964:
1949:
1931:
1914:
1895:
1877:
1858:
1811:
1786:
1767:
1735:
1699:
1676:
1646:
1558:
1538:
1519:
1499:
1465:
1446:
1428:
1408:
1394:
1280:
1254:
1233:
1176:
1154:
1133:
1101:
1082:
1053:
1028:
1009:
981:
963:
948:
917:
897:
833:
814:
779:
758:
653:
618:
481:
421:
375:
249:
227:
188:
2887:
2646:
2598:
2583:
2507:
2185:
1638:
1168:
1142:
1125:
730:
682:
667:
632:
448:
432:
241:
219:
548:
544:
316:
312:
3024:
2657:
2498:
1902:
1850:
1794:
1774:
1759:
1489:
1414:
1097:
1049:
850:
417:
371:
237:
857:. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see
3081:
2774:
2751:
2065:
2051:
2021:
2002:
1988:
1969:
1956:
1937:
1923:
1882:
1869:
1825:
1778:
1727:
1668:
1526:
1511:
1434:
1418:
1378:
1270:
1225:
1200:
1184:
1016:
1001:
969:
955:
924:
909:
124:
2675:
2619:
845:
703:
387:
2626:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
853:. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up
710:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
3247:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2866:
2164:
1615:
1266:
868:, instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:
650:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
3075:
1285:
Seals was found murdered on September 6, 2016 inside a burning car. He was 29.
500:
268:
1488:. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~
793:
2034:
The RfC has already been closed with an overwhelming consensus. We now need:
1564:
Invitation to Women in Architecture & Women in Archaeology editathons
2980:
Hello, Innisfree987. It has been over six months since you last edited your
202:, meaning covered enough in media to get a Knowledge (XXG) article on them (
1328:"Man found shot to death in Riverview had been active in Ferguson protests"
996:
My apologies. I didn't mean to offend you with that; I was snarking about
649:. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards,
1092:
1060:
1044:
412:
366:
2712:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
875:. There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as
3063:
BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
2497:
I have a personal opinion about AfD and that is that there is a lot of
3078:. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :)
2618:
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
2148:
as well as our strong support for articles on women in connection with
702:
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
2802:
2771:
Knowledge (XXG):New pages patrol/RfC on patrolling without user right
2748:
Knowledge (XXG):New pages patrol/RfC on patrolling without user right
1972:
At minimum I probably need to know which others you're speaking for.
1722:
work group. There is some reading to be done before signing up. See:
1686:
Hi. thanks for your contributions towards the challenge. I'm running
3023:
Thanks for your submission to Knowledge (XXG), and happy editing.
2591:
675:
2645:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
729:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
97:
Hello, Innisfree987, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
164:
2601:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
685:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
2438:
2431:
2424:
2417:
2410:
2403:
2396:
240:
article which does not indicate the significance of the person.
3208:
Belated thank you and hope you're having a happy start to 2017
2715:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
568:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
332:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
3226:
2387:
2001:
Hm. I'm really surprised and sorry to learn you feel that way
596:
Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors
360:
Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors
211:
this person as the subject - interviews, profiles and so on.)
25:
1714:
an RfC, it is a call for genuinely interested users who have
1383:
erroneously reported Gabby Giffords had died when she had not
3184:
2972:
2865:
2795:
2590:
2544:
It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at
2328:
2163:
2114:
2107:
1614:
1578:
1571:
1464:
674:
499:
267:
2848:
During the period of 21 Nov - 8 Dec, we are also supporting
1849:
to read "no reliable references" instead of no references.
1472:
Hi Innisfree987, I just wanted to let you know that I have
177:, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
2927:
campaigner permanent notability for a stand alone article.
1204:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
551:
and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional
452:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
319:
and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional
2634:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
1830:
I don't know about others, but the first 2 paragraphs of
1688:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon
718:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
575:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
339:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
3129:
2997:
2696:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2647:
2637:
1846:
1842:
1705:
Policies for dealing with new articles at NPP & AfC
1473:
1240:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge
1198:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1117:
731:
721:
585:
577:
446:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
349:
341:
173:
2622:. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can
2548:
and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at
706:. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can
572:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
336:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
2528:
Since July there has been a very serious backlog at
855:
Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images
547:, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
465:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Jazmine Hughes
315:, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
1484:. For more information on the patroller right, see
1217:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Robyn Semien
849:Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to
3046:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Beauty Pageants
2996:
3076:BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon
2655:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge (XXG)!
2205:I'll be working on it over the next few days.
739:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge (XXG)!
535:. Please improve the submission's referencing
303:. Please improve the submission's referencing
1353:"Ferguson Activist Found Dead In Burning Car"
8:
2392:
931:; my own participation at AfD presently has
766:Ah, thanks for that lightning-fast response
2283:, because this may be beyond my expertise!
1303:"Ferguson activist Darren Seals dies at 29"
1019:, I appreciate hearing that. Much obliged.
172:
2247:
2132:Announcing two exciting online editathons
1718:experience in these areas to join a truly
3163:, I'm so touched by your thoughtfulness!
2822:Two new topics for our online editathons
2325:Welcome to The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure!
1724:Knowledge (XXG):The future of NPP and AfC
1525:Oh, thanks so much for the kind message,
1206:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
539:Knowledge (XXG):Referencing for beginners
454:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
307:Knowledge (XXG):Referencing for beginners
2616:to see how you can improve the article.
2354:The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure Start Page
2040:Editors to sign on to be instructors at
1657:Following up from the consensus reached
1413:Sounds good, and I understand. Likewise
700:to see how you can improve the article.
297:guidelines on the notability of websites
3159:Oh what a very kind message! Thank you
3123:Thank you for quality articles such as
2838:Our geographical topic of the month is
2042:Knowledge (XXG):New pages patrol/School
1351:II, Jim Dalrymple (September 6, 2016).
1293:
3245:Do not edit the contents of this page.
2037:Editors to request the patroller right
1773:BLPPROD doesn't really need an essay,
876:
869:
862:
529:guidelines on the notability of people
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
2612:. You may like to take a look at the
2608:, which is recorded on the article's
2386:-- 15:25, Tuesday, November 1, 2016 (
1653:RfC for page patroller qualifications
1301:Stewart, Mariah (September 6, 2016).
696:. You may like to take a look at the
692:, which is recorded on the article's
7:
2685:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
2359:The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure Lounge
2698:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
2682:Hello, Innisfree987. Voting in the
2487:Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge
2481:About The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure
820:Thanks for all your help with this
792:I see that you placed a BLPPROD on
557:The comment the reviewer left was:
120:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
2561:(Sent to all active AfC reviewers)
2364:The Teahouse new editor help space
2100:An invitation to November's events
506:Your recent article submission to
274:Your recent article submission to
24:
2604:The article has been assessed as
1215:The article will be discussed at
1163:The article has been restored to
688:The article has been assessed as
463:The article will be discussed at
3230:
3116:
2674:
1191:
844:
631:
439:
386:
134:How to create your first article
29:
2518:New Page Review needs your help
579:Articles for creation help desk
401:Articles for creation help desk
343:Articles for creation help desk
152:to ask questions or seek help.
115:Contributing to Knowledge (XXG)
1647:20:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
1559:19:54, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
1539:20:26, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
1520:18:55, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
1500:06:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
516:coverage about the subject in
284:coverage about the subject in
174:ask for help on your talk page
144:You may also want to take the
1:
3203:15:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
3173:21:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
3152:13:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
2958:21:58, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
2937:20:48, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
2918:20:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
2896:22:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
2788:December 2016 at Women in Red
2783:13:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
2760:11:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
2735:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
2661:16:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
2573:16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
1486:Knowledge (XXG):Autopatrolled
1447:16:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
1429:01:55, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
1409:01:52, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
1395:01:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
1281:01:11, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
1255:09:22, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
805:reliable source in anyway. --
543:, so that the information is
311:, so that the information is
171:, ask me on my talk page, or
3098:00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
3058:02:52, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
3035:19:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
2513:05:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
2315:15:34, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
2293:19:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
2266:19:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
2238:17:35, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
2215:16:43, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
2194:18:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
2078:13:23, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
2060:04:08, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
2030:00:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
2015:15:14, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
1997:13:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
1982:12:33, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
1965:10:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
1950:03:38, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
1932:02:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
1915:02:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
1896:01:58, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
1878:01:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
1859:23:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
1812:21:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
1787:05:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
1768:01:35, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
800:is only for pages that have
563:when they have been resolved
327:when they have been resolved
189:08:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
3222:21:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
2984:draft article submission, "
2719:and submit your choices on
2153:Knowledge (XXG) Asian Month
1736:15:43, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
1700:11:25, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
1677:12:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
1326:Staff (September 6, 2016).
1234:22:49, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
1177:03:40, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
1165:User:Innisfree987/Qias Omar
1155:03:33, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
1134:03:28, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
236:I see you also created the
3299:
3090:MediaWiki message delivery
2727:MediaWiki message delivery
2717:the candidates' statements
2565:MediaWiki message delivery
2459:The Veil of Verifiability
2456:The Neutral Point of View
2453:Small Changes, Big Impact
2369:Knowledge (XXG) Help pages
1102:21:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
1083:19:24, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
1054:19:04, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
1029:20:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
1010:05:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
982:19:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
964:23:34, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
949:17:47, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
918:14:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
898:19:28, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
834:16:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
815:16:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
422:01:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
376:01:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
250:22:18, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
228:20:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
139:Simplified Manual of Style
2884:Women in Red/Opt-out list
2794:
2182:Women in Red/Opt-out list
2106:
1633:Women in Red/Opt-out list
1570:
780:22:13, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
759:22:10, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
654:07:24, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
630:
482:19:39, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
169:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
146:Knowledge (XXG) Adventure
2880:Women in Red/Invite list
2648:leaving us some feedback
2624:create articles yourself
2178:Women in Red/Invite list
1629:Women in Red/Invite list
1208:or whether it should be
1038:The Practice of Diaspora
732:leaving us some feedback
708:create articles yourself
619:23:01, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
456:or whether it should be
3111:entries for journalists
2765:New Page Reviewer - RfC
2742:New Page Reviewer - RfC
2450:An Invitation to Earth
2447:Say Hello to the World
2277:talk page for the entry
2201:Thank you for your help
2137:Women in Food and Drink
1332:St. Louis Post-Dispatch
527:of the subjectâsee the
295:of the subjectâsee the
129:How to develop articles
3189:
2977:
2870:
2809:
2800:
2595:
2465:Looking Good Together
2333:
2168:
2119:
2112:
2099:
1619:
1583:
1576:
1469:
1307:The St. Louis American
679:
504:
272:
18:User talk:Innisfree987
3243:of past discussions.
3188:
3125:Rachel Kaadzi Ghansah
2982:Articles for Creation
2976:
2869:
2833:Women in the Military
2808:
2805:File:Roza Shanina.jpg
2799:
2694:Arbitration Committee
2667:ArbCom Elections 2016
2628:Articles for Creation
2594:
2580:Articles for creation
2332:
2167:
2118:
2111:
1754:(and others, such as
1618:
1599:Women in Architecture
1582:
1575:
1468:
712:Articles for Creation
678:
664:Articles for creation
639:The Writer's Barnstar
508:Articles for Creation
503:
489:Articles for creation
276:Articles for Creation
271:
257:Articles for creation
42:of past discussions.
2966:Your draft article,
2530:Special:NewPagesFeed
1603:Women in Archaeology
587:reviewer's talk page
570:Draft:Rembert Browne
351:reviewer's talk page
194:Heben Nigatu article
3072:Thursday 8 December
2998:edit the submission
2968:Draft:Another Round
2578:Your submission at
1482:new page patrollers
662:Your submission at
624:A barnstar for you!
487:Your submission at
334:Draft:Another Round
255:Your submission at
155:Please remember to
3190:
3135:awesome Wikipedian
2978:
2871:
2810:
2801:
2710:arbitration policy
2669:: Voting now open!
2596:
2538:New Page Reviewing
2462:The Civility Code
2334:
2169:
2120:
2113:
1841:the past (such as
1649:via MassMessaging
1620:
1584:
1577:
1470:
1070:ensuing discussion
879:Some image caption
680:
647:Forbes 30 Under 30
505:
273:
125:How to edit a page
99:your contributions
3286:
3285:
3255:
3254:
3249:current talk page
3181:Seasons Greetings
3100:
3050:John Pack Lambert
2929:John Pack Lambert
2910:John Pack Lambert
2899:
2898:via MassMessaging
2875:
2874:
2827:Women in Aviation
2586:has been accepted
2563:
2522:Hi Innisfree987,
2469:
2468:
2268:
2252:comment added by
2197:
2196:via MassMessaging
2173:
2172:
1636:
1624:
1623:
1497:
1141:All sounds great
1000:, not about you.
892:What I been doing
670:has been accepted
659:
658:
594:You can also use
542:
428:
427:
358:You can also use
310:
159:your messages on
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
3290:
3264:
3257:
3256:
3234:
3233:
3227:
3132:
3120:
3079:
3031:
3028:
3012:
3011:
3006:
3005:
3000:
2975:
2877:
2806:
2792:
2791:
2678:
2650:
2640:
2559:
2554:the new tutorial
2510:
2488:
2482:
2441:
2434:
2427:
2420:
2413:
2406:
2399:
2393:
2346:Hi Innisfree987!
2331:
2175:
2104:
2103:
2046:More new admins.
1829:
1822:
1697:
1626:
1568:
1567:
1545:T-Money (rapper)
1493:
1479:
1425:
1422:
1367:
1366:
1364:
1363:
1348:
1342:
1341:
1339:
1338:
1323:
1317:
1316:
1314:
1313:
1298:
1277:
1274:
1269:to update them)
1252:
1195:
1194:
893:
886:
881:
874:
867:
848:
770:! Much obliged.
756:
751:
734:
724:
635:
628:
627:
616:
611:
590:
582:
536:
443:
442:
390:
383:
382:
354:
346:
304:
216:reliable sources
186:
181:
176:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
3298:
3297:
3293:
3292:
3291:
3289:
3288:
3287:
3260:
3231:
3183:
3140:
3139:
3133:, - you are an
3128:
3121:
3106:
3065:
3042:
3040:beauty pageants
3029:
3026:
3009:
3008:
3003:
3002:
3001:and remove the
2973:
2971:
2946:Johnpacklambert
2905:
2882:. Unsubscribe:
2878:(To subscribe:
2856:
2846:
2843:Caribbean Women
2836:
2804:
2790:
2775:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
2767:
2752:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
2744:
2739:
2738:
2722:the voting page
2679:
2671:
2663:
2636:
2630:if you prefer.
2620:Knowledge (XXG)
2588:
2520:
2508:
2495:
2490:
2486:
2480:
2477:
2439:
2432:
2425:
2418:
2411:
2404:
2397:
2329:
2327:
2220:You're welcome
2203:
2180:. Unsubscribe:
2176:(To subscribe:
2156:
2146:
2102:
2052:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
2022:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
1989:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
1957:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
1924:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
1870:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
1823:
1816:
1779:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
1743:
1728:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
1707:
1693:
1684:
1669:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
1664:this discussion
1655:
1631:. Unsubscribe,
1627:(To subscribe,
1607:
1566:
1547:
1507:
1496:
1477:
1463:
1423:
1420:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1361:
1359:
1350:
1349:
1345:
1336:
1334:
1325:
1324:
1320:
1311:
1309:
1300:
1299:
1295:
1275:
1272:
1262:
1248:
1243:
1196:
1192:
1189:
1114:
1040:
994:
956:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
933:86% green cells
910:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
905:
895:
891:
884:
880:
873:
866:
859:WP:INFOBOXIMAGE
842:
790:
761:
754:
742:
720:
714:if you prefer.
704:Knowledge (XXG)
672:
626:
621:
614:
602:
584:
576:
560:
556:
533:the golden rule
497:
444:
440:
437:
424:
378:
348:
340:
324:
301:the golden rule
265:
196:
184:
179:
163:by typing four
110:Getting started
95:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3296:
3294:
3284:
3283:
3278:
3275:
3270:
3265:
3253:
3252:
3235:
3225:
3224:
3182:
3179:
3178:
3177:
3176:
3175:
3115:
3113:
3108:
3107:
3105:
3102:
3064:
3061:
3041:
3038:
2970:
2964:
2963:
2962:
2961:
2960:
2940:
2939:
2904:
2901:
2873:
2872:
2858:
2857:
2850:
2849:
2847:
2840:
2839:
2837:
2824:
2823:
2819:
2816:
2815:
2813:December 2016
2812:
2789:
2786:
2766:
2763:
2743:
2740:
2680:
2673:
2672:
2670:
2664:
2653:
2652:
2643:
2614:grading scheme
2603:
2599:Allison Aubrey
2589:
2587:
2584:Allison Aubrey
2576:
2519:
2516:
2494:
2491:
2478:
2476:
2470:
2467:
2466:
2463:
2460:
2457:
2454:
2451:
2448:
2444:
2443:
2436:
2429:
2422:
2415:
2408:
2401:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2380:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2371:
2366:
2361:
2356:
2326:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2320:
2319:
2318:
2317:
2295:
2241:
2240:
2225:
2202:
2199:
2171:
2170:
2158:Faciliated by
2157:
2150:
2149:
2147:
2134:
2133:
2129:
2126:
2125:
2123:November 2016
2122:
2101:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2080:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2044:
2038:
2032:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1847:boldly changed
1790:
1789:
1742:
1739:
1706:
1703:
1683:
1680:
1654:
1651:
1622:
1621:
1609:Faciliated by
1608:
1596:
1593:
1590:
1589:
1586:
1565:
1562:
1546:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1506:
1503:
1494:
1462:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1369:
1368:
1343:
1318:
1292:
1291:
1287:
1261:
1258:
1242:
1237:
1190:
1188:
1183:Nomination of
1181:
1180:
1179:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1113:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1039:
1036:
1034:
1032:
1031:
993:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
929:closed as keep
904:
901:
889:
878:
871:
864:
841:
838:
837:
836:
789:
786:
785:
784:
783:
782:
768:SwisterTwister
737:
736:
727:
698:grading scheme
687:
683:Rembert Browne
673:
671:
668:Rembert Browne
660:
657:
656:
642:
641:
636:
625:
622:
600:
599:
592:
573:
558:
511:
498:
496:
493:Rembert Browne
485:
449:Jazmine Hughes
438:
436:
433:Jazmine Hughes
431:Nomination of
429:
426:
425:
393:
391:
380:
364:
363:
356:
337:
279:
266:
264:
253:
235:
232:
214:Are there any
195:
192:
180:SwisterTwister
142:
141:
136:
131:
122:
117:
112:
94:
91:
83:
82:
77:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3295:
3282:
3279:
3276:
3274:
3271:
3269:
3266:
3263:
3259:
3258:
3250:
3246:
3242:
3241:
3236:
3229:
3228:
3223:
3219:
3215:
3211:
3207:
3206:
3205:
3204:
3200:
3196:
3187:
3180:
3174:
3170:
3166:
3162:
3158:
3157:
3156:
3155:
3154:
3153:
3149:
3145:
3138:
3136:
3131:
3126:
3119:
3114:
3112:
3103:
3101:
3099:
3095:
3091:
3087:
3083:
3077:
3073:
3069:
3068:AfC Reviewers
3062:
3060:
3059:
3055:
3051:
3047:
3039:
3037:
3036:
3033:
3032:
3021:
3019:
3014:
2999:
2994:
2989:
2987:
2986:Another Round
2983:
2969:
2965:
2959:
2955:
2951:
2947:
2944:
2943:
2942:
2941:
2938:
2934:
2930:
2925:
2922:
2921:
2920:
2919:
2915:
2911:
2903:Misty K. Snow
2902:
2900:
2897:
2893:
2889:
2885:
2881:
2868:
2864:
2863:
2859:
2855:
2854:
2853:BBC 100 Women
2845:
2844:
2835:
2834:
2829:
2828:
2820:
2818:
2817:
2814:
2807:
2798:
2793:
2787:
2785:
2784:
2780:
2776:
2772:
2764:
2762:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2749:
2741:
2737:
2736:
2732:
2728:
2724:
2723:
2718:
2713:
2711:
2707:
2703:
2699:
2695:
2690:
2687:
2686:
2677:
2668:
2665:
2662:
2659:
2656:
2649:
2644:
2641:
2639:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2629:
2625:
2621:
2615:
2611:
2607:
2602:
2600:
2593:
2585:
2581:
2577:
2575:
2574:
2570:
2566:
2562:
2557:
2555:
2551:
2547:
2542:
2539:
2534:
2531:
2526:
2523:
2517:
2515:
2514:
2511:
2505:
2500:
2499:systemic bias
2493:AfD Bleitrach
2492:
2489:
2483:
2475:
2474:
2464:
2461:
2458:
2455:
2452:
2449:
2446:
2445:
2442:
2437:
2435:
2430:
2428:
2423:
2421:
2416:
2414:
2409:
2407:
2402:
2400:
2395:
2394:
2391:
2389:
2370:
2367:
2365:
2362:
2360:
2357:
2355:
2352:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2347:
2344:
2343:
2342:
2341:
2340:
2339:
2338:
2337:
2336:
2335:
2324:
2316:
2312:
2308:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2294:
2290:
2286:
2282:
2278:
2274:
2270:
2269:
2267:
2263:
2259:
2255:
2251:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2239:
2235:
2231:
2226:
2223:
2219:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2212:
2208:
2200:
2198:
2195:
2191:
2187:
2183:
2179:
2166:
2162:
2161:
2155:
2154:
2145:
2144:
2143:Women Writers
2139:
2138:
2130:
2128:
2127:
2124:
2117:
2110:
2105:
2079:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2050:
2045:
2043:
2039:
2036:
2035:
2033:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2004:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1994:
1990:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1939:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1889:
1884:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1866:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1839:
1838:
1833:
1827:
1820:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1791:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1776:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1752:
1746:
1740:
1738:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1704:
1702:
1701:
1698:
1696:
1689:
1681:
1679:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1665:
1660:
1652:
1650:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1634:
1630:
1617:
1613:
1612:
1606:
1604:
1600:
1594:
1592:
1591:
1588:
1587:October 2016
1581:
1574:
1569:
1563:
1561:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1504:
1502:
1501:
1498:
1492:
1487:
1483:
1478:autopatrolled
1475:
1467:
1461:Autopatrolled
1460:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1427:
1426:
1416:
1415:Islam Karimov
1412:
1411:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1358:
1357:BuzzFeed News
1354:
1347:
1344:
1333:
1329:
1322:
1319:
1308:
1304:
1297:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1283:
1282:
1279:
1278:
1268:
1259:
1257:
1256:
1253:
1251:
1241:
1238:
1236:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1221:
1218:
1213:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1202:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1161:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1121:
1119:
1112:Re: Qias Omar
1111:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1094:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1071:
1067:
1062:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1046:
1037:
1035:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
991:
983:
979:
975:
971:
967:
966:
965:
961:
957:
952:
951:
950:
946:
942:
938:
934:
930:
926:
922:
921:
920:
919:
915:
911:
902:
900:
899:
894:
887:
872:SomeImage.jpg
860:
856:
852:
851:Jenna Wortham
847:
839:
835:
831:
827:
823:
819:
818:
817:
816:
812:
808:
803:
799:
795:
787:
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
764:
763:
762:
760:
757:
752:
749:
745:
740:
733:
728:
725:
723:
717:
716:
715:
713:
709:
705:
699:
695:
691:
686:
684:
677:
669:
665:
661:
655:
652:
648:
644:
643:
640:
637:
634:
629:
623:
620:
617:
612:
609:
605:
597:
593:
589:
588:
581:
580:
574:
571:
567:
566:
564:
554:
550:
546:
540:
534:
530:
526:
522:
520:
515:
509:
502:
494:
490:
486:
484:
483:
479:
475:
474:Laxnesh LOKEN
469:
466:
461:
459:
455:
451:
450:
434:
430:
423:
419:
415:
414:
409:
408:
403:
402:
397:
392:
389:
385:
384:
381:
377:
373:
369:
368:
361:
357:
353:
352:
345:
344:
338:
335:
331:
330:
328:
322:
318:
314:
308:
302:
298:
294:
290:
288:
283:
277:
270:
262:
261:Another Round
258:
254:
252:
251:
247:
243:
239:
238:Tracy Clayton
233:
230:
229:
225:
221:
217:
212:
210:
205:
201:
193:
191:
190:
187:
182:
175:
170:
166:
162:
158:
153:
151:
147:
140:
137:
135:
132:
130:
126:
123:
121:
118:
116:
113:
111:
107:
104:
103:
102:
100:
92:
90:
89:
81:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
3261:
3244:
3238:
3214:Innisfree987
3191:
3165:Innisfree987
3161:Gerda Arendt
3144:Gerda Arendt
3141:
3122:
3110:
3109:
3082:user:Kudpung
3071:
3067:
3066:
3043:
3025:
3022:
3015:
2990:
2979:
2950:Innisfree987
2906:
2876:
2862:Women in Red
2860:
2851:
2841:
2831:
2825:
2821:
2811:
2768:
2745:
2720:
2714:
2691:
2683:
2681:
2654:
2635:
2617:
2605:
2597:
2560:
2558:
2543:
2535:
2527:
2524:
2521:
2496:
2472:
2385:
2345:
2307:Innisfree987
2303:WP:ADVENTURE
2299:JoslynCorvis
2285:Innisfree987
2273:JoslynCorvis
2254:JoslynCorvis
2248:â Preceding
2230:Innisfree987
2222:JoslynCorvis
2207:JoslynCorvis
2204:
2174:
2160:Women in Red
2151:
2141:
2135:
2131:
2121:
2070:Innisfree987
2007:Innisfree987
1974:Innisfree987
1942:Innisfree987
1907:Innisfree987
1888:Innisfree987
1836:
1835:
1819:Innisfree987
1804:Innisfree987
1747:
1744:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1708:
1694:
1685:
1663:
1656:
1625:
1611:Women in Red
1597:
1595:
1585:
1551:JoslynCorvis
1548:
1531:Innisfree987
1508:
1505:Women in Red
1490:
1471:
1439:Innisfree987
1419:
1401:Innisfree987
1387:Innisfree987
1360:. Retrieved
1356:
1346:
1335:. Retrieved
1331:
1321:
1310:. Retrieved
1306:
1296:
1288:
1284:
1271:
1263:
1260:Darren Seals
1249:
1244:
1222:
1214:
1201:Robyn Semien
1199:
1197:
1187:for deletion
1185:Robyn Semien
1147:Innisfree987
1122:
1118:your message
1115:
1091:
1075:Innisfree987
1066:a recent AfD
1043:
1041:
1033:
1021:Innisfree987
997:
995:
974:Innisfree987
941:Innisfree987
906:
843:
826:Innisfree987
801:
791:
772:Innisfree987
747:
743:
738:
719:
701:
689:
681:
638:
607:
603:
586:
578:
562:
552:
524:
518:
513:
470:
462:
447:
445:
435:for deletion
411:
405:
399:
396:Innisfree987
395:
379:
365:
350:
342:
326:
320:
292:
286:
281:
234:
231:
213:
208:
197:
154:
150:The Teahouse
143:
106:Introduction
96:
87:
86:
60:
43:
37:
3237:This is an
3210:Victuallers
3195:Victuallers
2281:WP:Helpdesk
1716:significant
1695:Dr. Blofeld
1682:Destubathon
1510:problems.--
1267:2016 deaths
1250:Dr. Blofeld
840:August 2016
807:Nat Gertler
525:independent
514:significant
293:independent
282:significant
36:This is an
3010:{{db-g13}}
3004:{{db-afc}}
2706:topic bans
2606:Stub-Class
2504:WP:CANVASS
2064:Thank you
1832:WP:BLPPROD
1799:NatGertler
1756:NatGertler
1605:editathons
1362:2016-09-06
1337:2016-09-07
1312:2016-09-07
1289:References
992:Alex Deans
885:Zackmann08
822:NatGertler
798:WP:BLPPROD
794:Anne Paulk
690:Stub-Class
583:or on the
545:verifiable
347:or on the
313:verifiable
263:(March 28)
161:talk pages
3281:Archive 5
3273:Archive 3
3268:Archive 2
3262:Archive 1
3018:this link
2993:mainspace
2888:Rosiestep
2702:site bans
2638:help desk
2610:talk page
2536:Although
2509:Montanabw
2440:Mission 7
2433:Mission 6
2426:Mission 5
2419:Mission 4
2412:Mission 3
2405:Mission 2
2398:Mission 1
2297:Hi again
2186:Rosiestep
1843:this edit
1720:proactive
1639:Rosiestep
1169:Gogo Dodo
1143:Gogo Dodo
1126:Gogo Dodo
877:|caption=
722:help desk
694:talk page
523:that are
291:that are
242:Music1201
220:Blythwood
80:Archive 5
72:Archive 3
67:Archive 2
61:Archive 1
3104:Precious
2658:Smmurphy
2473:Get Help
2262:contribs
2250:unsigned
1903:Adam9007
1865:KommWiss
1851:Adam9007
1795:Adam9007
1775:Adam9007
1760:Adam9007
1751:an essay
998:Upworthy
553:reliable
519:reliable
495:(July 6)
407:Teahouse
321:reliable
287:reliable
93:Welcome!
3240:archive
3130:support
3013:code.
2546:WP:PERM
2066:Kudpung
2003:Kudpung
1970:Kudpung
1938:Kudpung
1883:Kudpung
1837:they're
1826:Kudpung
1741:BLPPROD
1527:Ipigott
1512:Ipigott
1435:Adog104
1379:Adog104
1226:Bearcat
1210:deleted
1017:Bearcat
1015:Thanks
1002:Bearcat
970:Kudpung
937:WP:WHYN
925:Kudpung
870:|image=
863:|image=
788:BLPPROD
549:notable
521:sources
458:deleted
394:Hello!
317:notable
289:sources
200:notable
39:archive
2550:WP:NPR
1601:&
750:wister
746:wister
651:Anupam
610:wister
606:wister
204:here's
165:tildes
2923:This
1476:the "
1474:added
1167:. --
1098:talk
1050:talk
537:(see
418:talk
372:talk
305:(see
209:about
16:<
3218:talk
3199:talk
3169:talk
3148:talk
3094:talk
3084:for
3054:talk
3030:5969
3027:Onel
2988:".
2954:talk
2933:talk
2914:talk
2892:talk
2886:) --
2830:and
2779:talk
2756:talk
2731:talk
2692:The
2569:talk
2552:and
2311:talk
2289:talk
2258:talk
2234:talk
2211:talk
2190:talk
2184:) --
2140:and
2074:talk
2056:talk
2026:talk
2011:talk
1993:talk
1978:talk
1961:talk
1946:talk
1928:talk
1911:talk
1892:talk
1874:talk
1855:talk
1808:talk
1793:Hey
1783:talk
1764:talk
1745:Hi,
1732:talk
1726:. --
1673:talk
1667:. --
1659:here
1643:talk
1555:talk
1535:talk
1516:talk
1443:talk
1421:Adog
1405:talk
1391:talk
1377:Hey
1273:Adog
1230:talk
1173:talk
1151:talk
1130:talk
1079:talk
1025:talk
1006:talk
978:talk
960:talk
945:talk
914:talk
830:talk
811:talk
776:talk
755:talk
615:talk
531:and
478:talk
299:and
246:talk
224:talk
185:talk
157:sign
127:and
108:and
88:2016
3086:NPR
3007:or
2556:.
2388:UTC
2271:Hi
1712:not
1491:Rob
1424:104
1276:104
1116:Re
1093:DGG
1061:DGG
1059:Hi
1045:DGG
968:Ok
923:Hi
903:AfC
413:DGG
367:DGG
3277:â
3220:)
3201:)
3171:)
3150:)
3142:--
3137:!
3096:)
3088:.
3056:)
2956:)
2935:)
2916:)
2894:)
2781:)
2773:.
2758:)
2750:.
2733:)
2725:.
2704:,
2582::
2571:)
2484:|
2390:)
2313:)
2291:)
2264:)
2260:âĒ
2236:)
2213:)
2192:)
2076:)
2058:)
2028:)
2013:)
1995:)
1980:)
1963:)
1948:)
1930:)
1913:)
1894:)
1876:)
1857:)
1810:)
1785:)
1766:)
1734:)
1675:)
1645:)
1637:--
1557:)
1537:)
1518:)
1495:13
1445:)
1437:!
1407:)
1393:)
1355:.
1330:.
1305:.
1232:)
1212:.
1175:)
1153:)
1132:)
1100:)
1081:)
1068:+
1052:)
1027:)
1008:)
980:)
962:)
947:)
916:)
908:--
896:)
888:(/
832:)
813:)
802:no
778:)
666::
565:.
491::
480:)
460:.
420:)
374:)
329:.
259::
248:)
226:)
76:â
3251:.
3216:(
3197:(
3167:(
3146:(
3092:(
3080:(
3052:(
2952:(
2931:(
2912:(
2890:(
2777:(
2754:(
2729:(
2651:.
2642:.
2567:(
2309:(
2287:(
2256:(
2232:(
2209:(
2188:(
2072:(
2054:(
2024:(
2009:(
1991:(
1976:(
1959:(
1944:(
1926:(
1909:(
1890:(
1872:(
1853:(
1828::
1824:@
1821::
1817:@
1806:(
1781:(
1762:(
1730:(
1710:'
1671:(
1641:(
1635:)
1553:(
1533:(
1514:(
1441:(
1403:(
1389:(
1365:.
1340:.
1315:.
1228:(
1171:(
1149:(
1128:(
1096:(
1077:(
1048:(
1023:(
1004:(
976:(
958:(
943:(
912:(
865:]
828:(
809:(
774:(
748:T
744:S
735:.
726:.
608:T
604:S
598:.
591:.
541:)
476:(
416:(
370:(
362:.
355:.
309:)
244:(
222:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.