Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Interplanet Janet

Source 📝

1217: 1257: 235: 295: 463: 747: 138: 689:
The album's title is similar to that of the first album, 'What did you expect from the Vaccines?'. 'Come of Age' is just the short, just as 'What did you expect...?' was for the first album, also it looks a bit silly to title an article 'The Vaccines Come of Age - The Vaccines' or similar. I know its
1078:
I'm watching this page, and will check any changes on the sections I've edited, and any new sections you add. (I use pop-ups on "My Watchlist", so it's fast and easy to do the checking.) It's best for other editors, if a discussion is all on one page. (This discussion didn't seem to merit being on
879:
Here on Knowledge (XXG), articles are notebale (or not), and content is encyclopedic (or not). In the "Theatre is Evil" section above you refer to "notable controversy" about content. The distinction is an important, as the policies and guidelines are different. Learning and using the Wikipeidian
859:
This article has new editors working on it. The gentle nudge of is a better and more appropriate way to encourage them to stay, and within a short time give us a better encyclopedic result, than the harsher, less instructive, and inconsiderate of new editors approach, you applied several times. It
698:
and on Tuesday last week, I was at an album signing at HMV in manchester where the band did a few interviews with some small time local journalists and they were definitely saying they thought "it would be nice to keep the whole band name in the album title". I know I can't prove that but, I'll have
1026:
Fourth, you behaviour here is exactly the kind that drives away new editors, and causes admins to go inactive. Note that when I became an active editor years ago, en.wikipedia.org had about 3.000 admins -- it's now less than half that. Both are major long term problems here. If you care about
952:
I know the guidelines. I know that addition of unsourced material is not encouraged, and if the material is controversial, it should definitely be sourced. I also know that putting "under construction" at the top of a section means that it is short of facts, not that it is short of sourcing. If
786:
You can't add a contenious paragraph like that to an article without a single source. I'm yet to be convinced that it's a notable controversy - at best it probably warrants a sentence in the finished article - but either way you need to find the source first, then add the content. Nothing is so
953:
you're not prepared to add the sources, don't add the content yet. Wait a day or two until you have time to do it properly. The information isn't going anywhere. I came up with a general editing guideline a while back, which I've not written down anywhere before, but this seems a good time:
993:
First, I didn't add any of this content (though I might have copy-edited it some). I put the citations on the talk page, so the content could be developed with references. I planned on coming back later, and doing it in a more encyclopedic manner than it is now (if no one else
1094:
I remember the old wild west days when we just threw everything in and only worried about citations when challenged. This is not the olden days. One guideline that I am aware of - and one that has changed in the eight years I've been editing Knowledge (XXG) - states:
820:
BE PATIENT. I was using the Reflinks tool to save me some typing. You can't easily use this tool without adding the bare citation to the article first. Note that what you ASSUMED was just a blog entry, was actually published in the print edition, as well. Please
94:
The page was changed to Elizabeth Tweddle as that is her full name. An encyclopaedia would include the full name and not an abreviation. Also you mention that you should "use common names" that is not the case. Princess Anne is always called that and hardly ever
1145:
We are also partially back to the old days you refer to. In most cases, the guidelines again allow content to be added without citations. In those cases, citations are only needed, if challenged. A reasonable time period is allowed before deletion.
1054:
So I don't agree with your general editing guideline, or your editing on this article. Practice here on en.wikipedia.org, as evidenced by the changes in the policies and guidelines, and editing on other articles doesn't agree with you either. best
1139:
I would have respected it, and added the NY Times citation before reverting. Such an edit summary, would also help new editors understand what they have to do. What you did left them in the dark, and feeling like their good faith edits are not
261:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
1283:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
1097:"Contentious material about living persons (or recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." 1003:
Second, granted it was added without citations, I and several other editors added the s. My intent was to teach new editors to add citations, of where to add citations, and respect their efforts. Your blanket deletions made this much less
179:
You wrote that the two should clearly match one another and they did until you moved the page back. I assume that you'll watch that discussion and move the one page if necessary? Please respond on my talk at your convenience.
1017:, etc. This respect includes the fact that our POV could be different than yours, while both have valid points. That consensus should be developed not by an edit war, but by discussion on the talk page of the article. 420: 265:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
1287:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
416: 1323:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 855:
In addition, the Knowledge (XXG) Foundation has been encouraging us experienced editors to go gently on the new editors. New editors are being driven away, by the excessive behaviour of experienced editors.
762: 258: 802:
Stop. Do it properly or not at all. Take a few minutes and actually write the sources up into an acceptable state. Don't just say "the sources are there, happy editing". Put the work in.
408: 1280: 606: 602: 539: 1269: 590: 549: 430: 247: 535: 1187:
you of anything. I said, and still say, you hadn't kept up to date on some of the guidelines. I did not say you were out of date on all the guidelines.
348:
If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.
65: 25:
to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
1162: 1104: 977: 908: 803: 788: 471: 838:
You don't understand the relevant guidelines here, how they have changed over time, and you don't even do us the courtesy of linking to them.
323: 586: 545: 426: 740: 1348: 210:
Well, that's completely untrue. I don't know who considers it "obsolete", but I still hear it all the time, and it's what I'd use myself.--
630: 1045:
Sixth, your general editing guideline applies to you as much as it does to any other editor. It's equivalent to my "Be Patient" above.
579:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to
626: 322:
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
475: 478:
because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
145:
article you have been involved with has many issues and urgently needs improving. If you can help with these issues please see
49: 1344: 934:
The standards for the notability of articles are more stringent than the standards for content, than they were some years ago.
121: 542:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 423:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 34: 22: 583:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 371:
citing the es.wikipedia article. Fancy translating sources/information to bring the English version up to standard? Regards,
720: 388:
I'd say you're right in deleting the CME Zion page. As you said, it's gone nowhere and the info is in the referring pages.
284: 68:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
705: 103:
she is widely known as just Beyonce. Exactly same as Beth. She is always called Elizabeth in competitions and some press.
1335:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1273: 251: 54: 1340: 826: 189: 580: 787:
important that it needs to be rushed into Knowledge (XXG) without decent sourcing and due consideration of weight.
518:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
1122:. To me, the controversy in this article isn't of that kind. But if your Edit Summary had been something like: 1362: 275: 29: 598: 242: 226: 109: 925:
No, it's not a semantic argument. You haven't read the policies and guideline carefully in quite a few years.
61: 1036:
Fifth, you appear to know the guidelines as they were some years ago, but not significant changes since then.
1373: 193: 375: 1336: 327: 69: 1293: 664: 151:(This is a generic message. if it has been placed on your talk page inadvertantly, please ignore it.) 146: 44: 1027:
Knowledge (XXG), you'll become aware of these two problems, and consider how to change your behaviour.
519: 368: 268: 215: 96: 1312: 1303: 306: 715: 353: 116: 1332: 1316: 1369: 1197: 1151: 1084: 1060: 939: 885: 865: 843: 729: 393: 76:
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --
710: 1234: 754: 675: 670:
I thought it was standard practice to start a discussion on such mergers for completing them?
654: 565: 503: 487: 479: 446: 372: 338: 162: 1328: 1320: 1289: 1331:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1324: 1127: 1119: 1014: 822: 311: 780: 309:
because it appears to have no references. Under Knowledge (XXG) policy, all newly created
211: 185: 100: 1131: 1100: 721:
http://consequenceofsound.net/2012/09/album-review-the-vaccines-the-vaccines-come-of-age/
706:
http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2012/09/the-vaccines-the-vaccines-come-of-age.html
1216: 904: 770: 349: 104: 331: 316: 1264: 1248: 1193: 1147: 1080: 1056: 935: 881: 861: 839: 725: 645:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
556:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
437:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
389: 39: 825:
in the future. Give editors at least 24 hours to respond to a need for citations.
695: 691: 1230: 671: 650: 646: 561: 557: 499: 483: 467: 442: 438: 302: 288: 158: 154: 87: 1377: 1352: 1297: 1238: 1201: 1170: 1155: 1112: 1088: 1064: 985: 943: 916: 889: 869: 847: 811: 796: 774: 733: 679: 658: 569: 507: 491: 450: 397: 378: 357: 278: 219: 197: 166: 126: 80: 860:
will also encourage them to stay and help us improve the encyclopedia quicker.
903:
Notable, encyclopedic... what's the difference? This is a semantic argument. "
637: 622: 412: 181: 766: 531: 77: 1013:
Third, you have yet to show any respect for me and the other editors under
699:
a look about to see if any of the interviews are online anywhere. thanks.
149:, address the different points if you can, and leave any comments there. 1366: 527: 523: 746: 137: 1319:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
613: 1177:(Are you taking this personally? Your tone here makes me wonder.) 716:
http://www.heraldscotland.com/arts-ents/music/cd-review.18700745
99:
like her page entitles. Also BeyoncĂŠ. Although she is known as
259:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Michael White (producer)
753:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
745: 711:
http://www.the-fly.co.uk/reviews/album/1015267/the-vaccines/
293: 1192:
Hopefully we can both get back to improving articles now.
346:
Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.
1268:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
1161:
So please don't accuse me of not knowing the guidelines.
702:
EDIT: here's a couple more reviews using the full title:
246:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
959:
There are many things that can be done, but nothing that
1262:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
522:, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 411:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 240:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1281:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Gaggle (band)
207:'"the Ukraine" is generally considered obsolete.' 1311:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 696:http://www.nme.com/news/this-weeks-releases/65828 692:http://www.nme.com/news/this-weeks-releases/65828 319:that directly supports material in the article. 575:Disambiguation link notification for September 8 470:. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of 514:Disambiguation link notification for August 31 8: 690:strange. NME list the full title both here, 409:2012 Wimbledon Championships – Men's Doubles 403:Disambiguation link notification for July 13 761:redirect, you might want to participate in 757:. Since you had some involvement with the 60:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 1270:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 248:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 1367:Talk:Tor#Requested_move_10_December_2015 880:dialect of English helps everyone here. 330:. Once you have provided at least one 315:must have at least one reference to a 1229:Your username is perfect. Seriously. 905:You know what I call semantics? Wank. 367:Hi there - you removed the PROD from 7: 765:(if you have not already done so). 72:, ask me on my talk page, or place 30:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 875:Articles are noteable, not content 14: 1337:review the candidates' statements 1279:The article will be discussed at 476:Charles Stuart, Duke of Cambridge 257:The article will be discussed at 1255: 1215: 461: 233: 136: 1343:. For the Election committee, 1313:Arbitration Committee election 1304:ArbCom elections are now open! 1239:23:21, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 1202:23:56, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 1171:17:05, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 1156:23:56, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 1113:17:05, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 1089:23:56, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 1065:16:53, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 986:14:58, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 944:16:53, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 917:14:58, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 890:13:45, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 870:10:57, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 848:10:28, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 812:09:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 797:09:49, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 775:21:25, 13 September 2012 (UTC) 21:Hello, Interplanet Janet, and 1: 1378:20:11, 10 December 2015 (UTC) 1353:16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 734:16:53, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 680:23:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 659:17:47, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 407:Hi. When you recently edited 312:biographies of living persons 220:15:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 198:17:10, 18 February 2010 (UTC) 127:16:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC) 739:Donald L Lunsford listed at 81:09:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 50:How to write a great article 1339:and submit your choices on 827:Template:Under Construction 570:17:12, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 508:16:39, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 492:15:50, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 1393: 1345:MediaWiki message delivery 1163:Interplanet Janet, Esquire 1105:Interplanet Janet, Esquire 1079:the article's Talk page.) 978:Interplanet Janet, Esquire 909:Interplanet Janet, Esquire 804:Interplanet Janet, Esquire 789:Interplanet Janet, Esquire 167:23:08, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 1363:Talk:Tor (disambiguation) 1298:22:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC) 1214: 636:added a link pointing to 612:added a link pointing to 472:your recent contributions 451:11:54, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 398:00:03, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 324:Referencing for beginners 279:21:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC) 70:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 1272:or whether it should be 741:Redirects for discussion 599:Clayton, South Yorkshire 379:19:20, 2 July 2012 (UTC) 250:or whether it should be 243:Michael White (producer) 227:Michael White (producer) 141:Hi Interplanet Janet! A 763:the redirect discussion 358:08:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC) 1126:Has to be removed per 829:suggests several days. 750: 298: 1317:Arbitration Committee 749: 665:Bourne End, Cranfield 334:, you may remove the 307:proposed for deletion 297: 147:Talk:Northamptonshire 1223:The Special Barnstar 1130:, add citations per 1118:You're referring to 899:A couple of points: 647:opt-out instructions 581:disambiguation pages 558:opt-out instructions 520:2012 Tour of Britain 439:opt-out instructions 97:Anne, Princess Royal 1321:arbitration process 1208:A barnstar for you! 631:fix with Dab solver 607:fix with Dab solver 540:fix with Dab solver 421:fix with Dab solver 1333:arbitration policy 895:A couple of points 751: 589:• Join us at the 548:• Join us at the 429:• Join us at the 299: 35:How to edit a page 1358:You commented at: 1244: 1243: 1178: 759:Donald L Lunsford 755:Donald L Lunsford 594: 553: 434: 363:Uruguayan Clásico 285:Proposed deletion 1384: 1259: 1258: 1219: 1212: 1211: 1176: 1169: 1111: 984: 915: 810: 795: 627:check to confirm 603:check to confirm 584: 543: 536:check to confirm 465: 464: 424: 417:check to confirm 343: 337: 326:, or ask at the 296: 271: 237: 236: 140: 124: 119: 114: 107: 75: 1392: 1391: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1360: 1341:the voting page 1307: 1260: 1256: 1253: 1210: 1165: 1107: 1075: 980: 976:Happy editing. 911: 897: 877: 806: 791: 784: 781:Theatre Is Evil 744: 687: 668: 591:DPL WikiProject 577: 550:DPL WikiProject 516: 462: 458: 431:DPL WikiProject 405: 386: 384:CME Zion Church 365: 341: 335: 332:reliable source 317:reliable source 294: 292: 269: 238: 234: 231: 205: 174: 134: 122: 117: 110: 105: 101:Beyonce Knowles 92: 73: 55:Manual of Style 12: 11: 5: 1390: 1388: 1359: 1356: 1310: 1306: 1301: 1254: 1252: 1247:Nomination of 1245: 1242: 1241: 1226: 1225: 1220: 1209: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1189: 1188: 1180: 1179: 1159: 1158: 1142: 1141: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1092: 1091: 1074: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 998: 997: 996: 995: 974: 973: 955: 954: 949: 948: 947: 946: 929: 928: 927: 926: 920: 919: 896: 893: 876: 873: 853: 852: 851: 850: 833: 832: 831: 830: 815: 814: 783: 778: 743: 737: 686: 683: 667: 662: 643: 642: 641: 640: 619: 618: 617: 616: 576: 573: 515: 512: 511: 510: 457: 454: 404: 401: 385: 382: 364: 361: 291: 282: 232: 230: 225:Nomination of 223: 204: 201: 182:Justin (koavf) 173: 170: 133: 130: 91: 84: 66:sign your name 58: 57: 52: 47: 42: 37: 32: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1389: 1380: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1370:In ictu oculi 1368: 1365:. Please see 1364: 1357: 1355: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1305: 1302: 1300: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1285: 1282: 1277: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1266: 1265:Gaggle (band) 1250: 1249:Gaggle (band) 1246: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1227: 1224: 1221: 1218: 1213: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1181: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1144: 1143: 1138: 1134: 1133: 1129: 1124: 1123: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1077: 1076: 1072: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1016: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 983: 979: 972: 970: 966: 962: 957: 956: 951: 950: 945: 941: 937: 933: 932: 931: 930: 924: 923: 922: 921: 918: 914: 910: 906: 902: 901: 900: 894: 892: 891: 887: 883: 874: 872: 871: 867: 863: 857: 849: 845: 841: 837: 836: 835: 834: 828: 824: 819: 818: 817: 816: 813: 809: 805: 801: 800: 799: 798: 794: 790: 782: 779: 777: 776: 772: 768: 764: 760: 756: 748: 742: 738: 736: 735: 731: 727: 723: 722: 718: 717: 713: 712: 708: 707: 703: 700: 697: 693: 684: 682: 681: 677: 673: 666: 663: 661: 660: 656: 652: 648: 639: 635: 634: 632: 628: 624: 621: 620: 615: 611: 610: 608: 604: 600: 597: 596: 595: 592: 588: 582: 574: 572: 571: 567: 563: 559: 554: 551: 547: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 513: 509: 505: 501: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 455: 453: 452: 448: 444: 440: 435: 432: 428: 422: 418: 414: 410: 402: 400: 399: 395: 391: 383: 381: 380: 377: 374: 370: 362: 360: 359: 355: 351: 347: 340: 333: 329: 325: 320: 318: 314: 313: 308: 304: 290: 286: 283: 281: 280: 277: 276: 273: 272: 263: 260: 255: 253: 249: 245: 244: 228: 224: 222: 221: 217: 213: 208: 202: 200: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 178: 171: 169: 168: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 144: 139: 131: 129: 128: 125: 120: 115: 113: 108: 102: 98: 89: 85: 83: 82: 79: 71: 67: 63: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 41: 38: 36: 33: 31: 28: 27: 26: 24: 19: 18: 1361: 1308: 1286: 1278: 1263: 1261: 1251:for deletion 1222: 1184: 1166: 1160: 1125: 1108: 1096: 1093: 981: 975: 968: 964: 963:be done, by 960: 958: 912: 898: 878: 858: 854: 807: 792: 785: 758: 752: 724: 719: 714: 709: 704: 701: 688: 669: 644: 578: 555: 517: 480:my talk page 460: 459: 436: 406: 387: 369:this article 366: 345: 321: 310: 303:Tony Grisoni 301:The article 300: 289:Tony Grisoni 274: 267: 264: 256: 241: 239: 229:for deletion 209: 206: 176: 175: 150: 143:Top Priority 142: 135: 111: 93: 88:Beth Tweddle 59: 20: 16: 15: 1290:Ad Orientem 466:Hello, I'm 456:August 2012 203:The Ukraine 132:Northampton 1329:topic bans 1073:Guidelines 694:and here, 649:. Thanks, 638:Newsreader 623:Zeb Soanes 560:. Thanks, 441:. Thanks, 413:Pat Hughes 212:MacRusgail 74:{{helpme}} 62:Wikipedian 40:Help pages 1325:site bans 1183:I didn't 585:Read the 544:Read the 532:Dartmouth 425:Read the 350:West Eddy 328:help desk 305:has been 86:Renaming 64:! Please 1194:Lentower 1148:Lentower 1140:welcome. 1081:Lentower 1057:Lentower 1004:obvious. 967:, right 936:Lentower 882:Lentower 862:Lentower 840:Lentower 726:Nbdelboy 685:Vaccines 528:Knowsley 524:Carlisle 390:Yahnatan 339:prod blp 270:Schmidt, 45:Tutorial 17:Welcome! 1274:deleted 1231:Alexpvs 672:Bleaney 651:DPL bot 562:DPL bot 500:Mdann52 498:Sorry! 484:Mdann52 468:Mdann52 443:DPL bot 376:Snowman 252:deleted 159:Kudpung 155:Kudpung 23:welcome 1315:. The 1185:accuse 1128:WP:BLP 1120:WP:BLP 1099:(from 1015:WP:AGF 823:WP:AGF 614:Plague 1167:IANAL 1132:WP:RS 1109:IANAL 1101:WP:RS 994:had). 982:IANAL 913:IANAL 808:IANAL 793:IANAL 482:. 373:Giant 344:tag. 177:Hello 1374:talk 1349:talk 1294:talk 1235:talk 1198:talk 1152:talk 1085:talk 1061:talk 961:must 940:talk 886:talk 866:talk 844:talk 771:talk 767:TJRC 730:talk 676:talk 655:talk 566:talk 530:and 504:talk 488:talk 447:talk 394:talk 354:talk 216:talk 172:Move 163:talk 123:will 90:Page 78:Lysy 1309:Hi, 969:now 965:you 587:FAQ 546:FAQ 474:to 427:FAQ 287:of 118:ter 1376:) 1351:) 1327:, 1296:) 1276:. 1237:) 1200:) 1154:) 1087:) 1063:) 942:) 907:" 888:) 868:) 846:) 773:) 732:) 678:) 657:) 633:) 629:| 609:) 605:| 568:) 538:| 526:, 506:) 490:) 449:) 419:| 396:) 356:) 342:}} 336:{{ 254:. 218:) 196:☯ 165:) 157:-- 153:-- 1372:( 1347:( 1292:( 1233:( 1196:( 1150:( 1103:) 1083:( 1059:( 971:. 938:( 884:( 864:( 842:( 769:( 728:( 674:( 653:( 625:( 601:( 593:. 564:( 552:. 534:( 502:( 486:( 445:( 433:. 415:( 392:( 352:( 214:( 194:M 192:☺ 190:C 188:☮ 186:T 184:❤ 180:— 161:( 112:e 106:P

Index

welcome
The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign your name
Knowledge (XXG):Questions
Lysy
09:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Beth Tweddle
Anne, Princess Royal
Beyonce Knowles
P
e
ter
will
16:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Northamptonshire
Kudpung
Kudpung
talk
23:08, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Justin (koavf)
T
C
M

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑