User talk:Itub/2008-2011 - Knowledge (XXG)

2614:, but anyway, that's between the two of you. However, I can assure you that Smokefoot is in fact a very productive editor and I certainly hope that he will return from his wikibreak. He has started about 200 articles, most on inorganic chemicals, chemists, inorganic chemistry, and related topics, and his contributions are much appreciated. Most of his work doesn't cause any sort of controversy; I'd say it is only when he sees what he considers to be POV-pushing or misguided edits by newbies that things become a bit agitated. My suggestion is that if you don't agree with him you try to listen to other people. If the regulars at 2619:

polite). That's why we can usually reach a consensus very quickly: because we know how articles are usually organized and titled in practice. And that's why the less patient and polite among us got a bit ticked off when someone starts moving things around without sufficient discussion. More patient would also help IMHO; due to the nature of asynchronous communication, reaching a solid agreement about a merger can take weeks or even months. But we tend to have a philosophy that

3652: 2877:, you asked if the Protactinium picture is fabricated, it is even better 5 his of the 7 images he uploaded are clear copyright violations. I tried to get ride of most of them, but for Helium.png Radium.gif I have not found the original web page from which they were copied from, but as a serial violater I do not think we should keep any of the pictures of Vuerqex on any page. Can you have a look on him from time to time?-- 1563:

are no precise reports of production and prices, but the estimates I've seen are around 100 kg per year! That means that you could put most of the osmium made in the world in one year in a gallon-sized bottle (or a couple 2 L bottles for those not familiar with gallons ;-) As a result, Os has very little "real-world" application (i.e., anything other than scientific research or other very specialized niche uses). --

2330: 956: 3257:

section. One thing that I would remove is the thing about Os-192 being the densest substance. It is speculative, possibly wrong, unreferenced, and a bit trivial (and there have been complaints in the talk page about it). Also I think the separation between the physical and the chemical properties could use some improvement; I wouldn't mention properties of compounds in the physical properties section. --

213:

which are nice references and often nice to read. One of the chemists rights that he and his now dead collegue traveled to Great Britain when they where young and that they sat near Calais at the beach eating the last Meatball made by his mum. Or one of the guys started his Ph.D. 18 years old and finished with suma cum laude a year later shortly before his 20th birthday. I like those stories!--

1132:"multiplicative prefixes need not be used in binary names if there is no ambiguity about the stoichiometry of the compound". Maybe you can ask Physchim62 for a second opinion on the nomenclature, as he seems to know that very well. I think some of the names Plasmic Physics has been adding are not even correct (some of the others may be correct but are unnecessarily complicated). -- 2501: 3815: 3540:

sure that they'll go away you can add references to book reviews published in scientific journals. I found one the other day in Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 824, but it didn't say much about the series as a whole, since the review was about a volume on nickel. I don't know if you have convenient access, but I can send you the PDF if you want. --

483:(as good a choice as any...) and many make no mention as to their value. Given the nature of this 'work of art', unless there is a verifiable sale at auction for a substantial sum (rather than some somewhat arbitrary cost value), I suggest that this section be deleted, as its sale value is far from germane to the true vale of the work. -- 503:

with a morpholine ring, not a piperidine ring) look how the structure of methamphetamine was embedded into the ring structure in phenmetrazine. The other examples are also valid. This IS significant as a drug design method, however not in the naive sense Carebear and others think. Not everything you don't know is bullshit or vandalism.

2686:

what i mean is, the sentence effectively says something like "Carl Gustav Mosander found erbia in 1843", i think it should be made clear that this is a past meaning of erbia, as the sentence structure suggests the present meaning. anyway, let me know what you think, sorry if this message is a little confusing... lack of sleep :) xxx

1973:

is a deadline. I think the most important part is to have on board someone who is really familiar with the process and who has the patience to deal with all the minor details such as layout. I think if you get Mike Christie to agree that the article is ready, it will have a very high chance of passing easily. --

3198:

talk page and archives. At some point, you have commented on the issue of the display and/or placement of the Rorschach inkblot image. Based on my understanding of your comment(s), I have placed you into one of three categories. I am issuing this note so that you can review how I have placed you, and

2130:

talk page that I think crossed the line and inflamed tensions. I apologize for my hardheaded debate style regarding the definition of fluorocarbon. Ideally, I want to establish a positive co-editing working relationship with you. I am not sure if that is possible. I am about to make some edits to the

2085:

I believe is needed. A Perfect gas is NOT an Ideal gas. Many authors omit the existence of a perfect gas in its entirety because it is not of importance to most people because the majority of people aren't dealing with jet engine or rocket computational models where these small differences make years

1228:

Don't worry, I don't see it as stepping on my toes or as something negative, just as a well-intentioned move to what is, in my opinion, not the best title because few people use it. A redirect and mention of the alternative name are always a good idea, of course. My thinking is that it is best to use

193:

Thanks for creating the article! I don't have any other chemists in mind righ now, but I was thinking that one day we should look systematically at all the chemists that have articles in the German Knowledge (XXG) and not in the English one yet (probably mostly 19th-century German-speaking chemists).

2618:

all seem to agree about something, is not because of groupthink IMHO, but because they all have years of Knowledge (XXG) experience, and years or decades of chemistry experience (most of the regulars have chemistry PhDs, and at least a couple are university professors who are unfailingly patient and

2559:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note

2468:

thanks for reminding me of the assumption for dilute solutions. in that case, i don't see a problem with using the term equilibrium constant. i replaced the words "reacts vigorously" with water as an attempt to incorporate material that seemed to be typed from an author's experience and uncited into

1972:

I couldn't help much during the last few days because I was away. Don't worry, you can get the article featured but the process is a bit sui generis and takes some time to get used to. Now you learned that you need to have time available for a couple of weeks to respond to all comments because there

1495:

Looks good to me. Perhaps someone can come up with a better wording, but this should be enough. If there is something we can cite that says that the country is the "affiliation at the time of the award", it would be good to add that, but if not I think it is fine to just say it is the country listed

212:

On my userpage I already have my trophy list and most of listed are German chemist from the 19th century. Untill 1933 and even later the language of chemistry was German, but ........ I try to add one every few weeks and I download the necrologs or orbituary notices from Berichte or Liebigs Annalen,

177:

Spelling and english are not OK, but for a start it is OK! The book at googlebooks is quite funny and good to read. The article at Fresenius Analytical journal also gave a few aspects which where not covered by the Geramn article. So another chemist I can add to the trophy list ov having created the

2105:

Maybe aerospace engineers use a different definition of the term than most other physical scientists. Feel free to revert if you can add a reliable reference that explains the difference. But even then the article must be qualified by saying that in most fields the two terms are synonyms (there are

1898:

Hi, Ivan. I'm back and beginning the revisions. In Acid dissociation constant, Mike Christie has substituted theta for the thermodynamic standard sign, which I'm sure is wrong. I can't find the IUPAC recommendation on-line. Is it still the plimsoll mark, like ΔG or is like ΔG? Please comment on the

1562:

Looks like it's making a lot of progress. I see if I can help next week. A couple of comments: the fountain pen use is probably historical, same as for iridium, and a very remarkable fact that needs to be mentioned is that Os is the least used of the platinum metals. So little Os is made that there

502:

See piperidine talk, pharmacological significance. I have added from memory a few considerations in embedding a functional amino group into a semi-rigid conformation, like piperidine or morpholine. This is std pharmacology text material, also found in numerous teaching books. As an example (however

334:

Far as I know the boat configuration is at a higher energy than the chair configuration, but it is also a local minimum of energy, surrounded by an energy wall. As a local minimum it is stable, only less favored statistically. It would be instable, if it would be at a local maximum or slope, as the

318:

I based what I added on what I found in the literature. Apparently the research has focused on the two chair conformations, because they are the stable ones and therefore considered more significant. Of course, if you find research on the boat conformation of piperidine, feel free to add it. Due to

2685:

hey, sorry about my mis-edit. do you think that that note should be included in the article itself as it's quite a significant point? or maybe the wording should be changed to something like "what was then known as erbia" as the sentence doesn't make clear that it that it's using past terminology.

1326:

for the current discussion. I'm letting everyone know who has a comment on the relevant talk pages. Obviously, we're not going to push anything through without a full discussion of every issue, including whether to merge at all. My sense is that there's wide agreement on all the big points, but

915:

Sorry that you ended up nominating some articles right before the automated selection came out! An unfortunate happenstance, as we transition from a manual to an automated system. The manual system will remain open, though because a few articles may get mis-read by the bot or missed altogether.

302:

Conformations: Thanks for the edits. One could forget that the piperidine also has a boat conformation, what about that? If we don't include it, the info now there is incomplete in the essentials. If we include the full info to the same depth as in the chair conformation, the article becomes quite

3539:

I'm not in Basel anymore, but in New York. I think I met Helmut Sigel once. About the references: the template fanatics may not be satisfied with a link to the publisher's website, because they may say its self-published and self-interested and doesn't prove notability. If you want to make really

3102:

and for your work doing reviews. It is now just over a year since the last peer review was archived with no repsonse after 14 (or more) days, something we all can be proud of. There is a new Peer review user box to track the backlog (peer reviews at least 4 days old with no substantial response),

3077:

Happy New Year. I'm not really involved with the DYK process other than submitting a couple of entries. In my experience, it is possible not to receive any comments until the last possible day but still be promoted. I think the only thing you can do is to try to make the hook interesting and make

263:

That looks much better now. Apart from the fact that the important thioridazine compound is not mentioned, which is synthesized from the fireant toxin and the insecticidal phenothiazine, which is also a rubber vulcanization chemical. Ergo, thioridazine causes side effects like fireant bites, acts

2715:

ok, well how about "In 1843, Carl Gustav Mosander found that samples of yttria actually contained three oxides: white yttrium oxide (yttria), yellow terbium oxide (confusingly, this was called 'erbia' at the time) and the rose-colored erbium oxide (called 'terbia' at the time)." this removes any

2150:

style. You are doing major controversial edits without consensus while we are still discussing things. You slap dispute templates in "other people's" articles, but remove them from "your articles". You claim there is consensus behind your edits when there is none. I don't have any undying grudge

1949:

I have attempted to fix all the issues raised so far. Some of them appeared as direct edits of the article, which I picked up through the article's history tab. The FAC process is unlike any editorial process I have known and I'm particularly cross that you have been left out of the loop for the

1470:

Hi, I have readded the country column and matched synched everything with the Nobel website. Should I add some kind of note saying that the column just follows what the website says and may not necessarily indicate the birthplace/nationality? Do you consider your concerns addressed now? Thanks,

522:

on our watchlist, which means that we can readily see whenever someone posts anything new to the talk page. You don't need to spend time going around to announce it on each of our talk pages. Have you considered creating a user account? You could have a watchlist too, and it would be easier for

136:

Howdy, I'm mostly writing because I've got a question indirectly related to my chem article. I'm working on trying to bring ADC up to Class A under the Chemistry Wikiproject because I started work on the article 3 years ago. Since then, a user you may remember named Petergans has also made some

3256:

Looks promising. Well referenced and fairly comprehensive, although it needs some editing throughout. I hope I have some time to give more detailed suggestions or try to edit a bit myself, but I can't promise anything. One area that would be really nice to expand (if possible) is the compounds

2453:

Finally, I wouldn't say that this equilibrium can be used to demonstrate that hexafluoroacetone is "highly reactive". Highly reactive towards water, sure. And presumably reactive towards other nucleophiles by analogy. But on the flip side, it is unreactive towards oxygen (non-flammable), while

2806:

Ivan, I'm waiting till Monday to allow for responses over the weekend. After that I think we should substitute the lead by your version with whatever mods you think are needed. As you say, the situation has really degenerated and it is particularly disagreeable that people who know so little

2414:

Wonderful example isn't it? I think the keto-enol stuff (or lack thereof) could be made explicit in contrasting acetone. I reworked the reactivity section, can you take a look? I made the values non-specific and renamed (the value given in Lemal) as just the equilibrium as it seems the true

354:. In any case, I really meant "less stable". I'd guess that peridine spends around 99.9% of the time in a chair conformation, which is why I say it is more significant. However, if you find references for research on the boat (or twist) conformations of piperidine, feel free to add them. -- 847:

I think you'll be a great admin, since you've been around here for a while and have good judgment. However, RFA is not a walk in a park, so I understand your reluctance. If you wish, you can treat this as a standing invitation from me - just say the word and I'll start the ball rolling?

1131:

Based on our past interactions, I doubt he will listen to me or that he knows what he is talking about. Sorry if I can't assume good faith, but it looks like borderline trolling to me. The IUPAC Red Book clearly says that "charges need not be specified in stoichiometric names" and that

319:

the instability of the boat conformation, I don't think there will be enough to add to the same depth as the chair conformation, and I don't think that the article would be too heavy on conformational chemistry. If it looks that way, it's because it is too light in the other areas! --

2247:

I'm not sure what you mean exactly, but I've replaced the merge templates with a more generic version that doesn't suggest which is the "from" article and which is the "to" article. But the exact template doesn't matter that much anyway, what matters is the result of the discussion.

1058:

Did you have a look on the Image:Periodic_Table_by_Quality.SVG ? I like it that you simply can change the svg with a text editor and you get the new colours you want. Is this an improvment? Is the small Image Periodic_Table_by_Quality.png in every project elements box replaceable?

2642:(implicitly) on their talk page, on October 19th 2008, that the content was not POV pushing. (the only argument that was used before that was that i was citing too many primary sources which might create a biased perspective, but i eliminated the vast bulk of primary sources from 141:

article, and indeed it has. It also gave me a good feel for his editorial style, and I worry about him becoming possessive of the article again. I guess I'm looking for suggestions? I just want to avoid arguing about the relationship between thermodynamics and kinetics again.

77:(CaCrO4) as a synonym (surely it is a different compound?). As things stand at the moment, the redirect you created will get deleted unless the destination article is created. I think things should be handled differently, but just letting you know in case it does get deleted. 2887:

It was someone else who first asked about the image, but I agreed that it was a reasonable questions. Maybe it turns out that it is a real image, but as you say the main problem now is the copyright violations. Thanks for all the detective work in finding the originals!

2807:

chemistry should be telling how to write. My last round-robin was deliberatly provocative. We have to isolate those people who are making suggestions that we, as professional chemists, cannot accept. Time is running out. I'm going to be away on a winter break 13-27 Dec.

283:

I didn't delete that, but it's something that should be discussed in the article's talk page. The question is how much space should be devoted to derivatives, and how to make clear when we are talking about piperidine itself, and when about the piperidines in general.

3761: 382:? What I’m trying to do is give chemistry editors the latitude to use the SI-compliant lowercase L in prefixed forms (like ml), and also address the highly ambiguous non-prefixed form, like “2 l bottle” by requiring that it be uppercase L (“2 L bottle”). 1721:

I've added a table (I skipped the properties that were already done), although I see now from the discussion at the German WikiProject that there was already a tool that I didn't know about that could do more or less that! (The "templatetiger".)

2561: 460:

I have deleted the reference in this section as it was broken, although I must say that I was tempted to delete the whole subsection. However, the 'art-works' argument convinced me otherwise. I wonder how much someone would pay for the

3523:

Thanks for the reference idea. I have done the same for the other publishers. BTW are you still in Basel? I have known Helmut and Astrid Sigel for many years and the idea for this article came up at a meeting with them in Pisa, this June.

1115:

I tried to talk to this character about creating redirects (useful) or tidying up IUPAC name slot in ChemBox... I just cannot understand what is driving him, and the repeated efforts are annoying. Maybe plasmaphysics will listen to

2515:, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 2199:

page might leave a bad taste in your mouth currently, but if you can hear me out, please do. I think it would be most wise to merge organofluorine chemistry with organofluorine, in order to settle on the most general term. Thanks.

1932: 1074:

I've never edited the periodic table by quality so you'd have to ask the people who do that, but I think the SVG is a big improvement for the reason you give. It is much easier to edit, whether with a text editor or an SVG editor.

789:. I'm prepared to delete as G-1 nonsense. The chemistry is clearly wrong (simply based on the article title and the molecular formulae proposed in the box). I'll need you guys to help me make doubly certain, though. Thanks. -- 710:

Since you have administrative authority, you might be able to get this awful thing removed. It looks like the author is generating garbage. Probably a really smart 8-year old. PS thanks for all your good efforts and help.

2829:

My photograph is not fake! The photograph is real! It is not just a white powder! Look closely! Can't you see that it is obviously a metal of some sort! It is a tiny amount of protactinium, shown larger than actual size.

1212:

ion that could fall within this name. You are probably right about the terminology. I thought it might sound more clear this way. Please don't take this in any negative way, and let me know if you need any help with this.

1647:

It shouldn't take too much work; I just need to make some minor adjustments to parse the German box and let it run (which takes a few hours at most at the pace I usually run my script.) I'll let you know when it's done.

264:

insecticidal in the brain i.e. "anticholinesterase blocking" and also slightly vulcanizes softened brain tissues. Can we add that? ;-) It was there, but has been deleted. Not to talk about the important pharmaceuticals

2637:

thank you very much for the there is no deadline link, that helps me. but, IMHO, considering it to appear a personal attack, and raising POV isues serves as illogical defense mechanisms, IMHO. Smokefoot even conceeded

378:. What uncanny coincidence. Without seeing your contributions, I had chosen that same article for use in an example on Talk:MOSNUM only twelve hours later. What do you think of my latest proposal regarding ml / mL 871:

some links on my page to make clickable category links for my own future reference instead of putting my userpage in those categories. I just wanted to let you know that I appreciate it. Keep up the good work. -

3603:

Thank you. I'll take a look at the talk page to see what the concerns are and see if I can offer a comment, but honestly I don't have much time for improving articles right now. You might want to drop a line at

1833:, and he managed to get a paper about space colonization published in a peer reviewed journal. If you have time, could you give it a read and let me know if you see any areas that need improvement? Thank you. 1797:

No problem. I added the template because I saw it in a new articles list, but I don't really know anything about it. A google books search turns out many possible sources (the one that you used appears at the

1323: 1185:

I think it is ready, other than the missing citations and clarifications. There are a couple of things that should still be added, such as the Mossbauer effect, but those are not needed for GA in my opinion.

3147:

I'm still alive, thanks for asking. It's just that I moved, started a new job, and don't have as much free time to spend editing Knowledge (XXG). (I was procrastinating way too much at some point.) Cheers,

1485:

good enough? I was going to add something along the lines of "This information may not necessarily reflect the recipient's birthplace or present citizenship" but didn't think it was worded very well. --

832:

I'm a bit ambivalent. I'm critical of the RFA process and I'm not sure if I want to endure it, and also I'm afraid if I make it it would encourage me to spend even more time here! I'll think about it. --

1581:

The progess is due to the fact that history and production section are nearly identical to iridium and so most of the progess was your work. I will add the fact that it is the least used PGM. Thanks.--

3677:

to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

2972: 1917:, either is fine (but certainly not theta!). I suggest using ΔG° for simplicity (here I used the degree sign; I'm not sure if that is better than the superscripted lowercase o that you used. -- 3588:, the lack of clarity in both articles causes much confusion for new (and not-so-new) students. I've been hoping an expert might undertake a review of those pages for quite some time. Thanks, 1274:

Just wanted to let you know that I have followed your suggestion -- I converted this one-sentence article into a redirect to "striatum", which already discusses the corticostriate connection.

931:

No problem, it's just that I didn't read the instructions well enough. I somehow thought that only the articles on that page would be included, instead of those on the bot-generated list. --

239:, in case it helps find more interesting chemists that are missing. Note that some of the red links may just need redirects, while some of the blue links may not be about the same person! -- 1689:

Great. I reformated it into a sortable table. Would it be easy to list all articles with properties that I did not indicate as “OK”? That would enable us to easily find and correct them. --

916:

Also, in some cases we may want a complete set (e.g., we have all the known elements, even though a handful are theoretically ranked too low). Thanks for the nomination, anyway! Cheers,

2469:

a form that was cited. i removed the detail on the values for the K because it seemed that the billion part was the most important distinction between the two compounds. btw, i think the

2273: 2004: 2447:

Presumably, the equilibrium constants are for dilute aqueous solution; in that case, the activity of the solvent (water) is taken as 1 and can be excluded from the equilibrium constant.

2233:

If you could apply a new template for my proposal then I would appreciate it. I am not sure what it would be as the policy page I found got complex, and I need to sign off. Thanks. -

92:

It should be deleted--I created by mistake, sorry. I was creating redirects for some of the blue links in that table, but as you can see the row for CaCr2O7 had the wrong name! --

548: 379: 2650:, that we can work together, but unfortunately, I have a lurking fear that he/she might chirp up with an illogical contribution going against my statement here at any minute... 1826: 3307:. The osmium carbonyl hydrids are no exapmle because there the hydrogen is H. I tried to find it in my books, but could not locate a source for oxidation state -2. Thanks.-- 454: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3241:

article to GA and so I would ask you if you can have a short look and give a advice what could be improved. The lead is not done yet but the rest is OK I think. Thanks --

3271:

Thanks for the help! I will try to get the work done next week! You spotted the obvious things, which I always miss. The chem and phys properties should be separated. --

2941: 2937: 2919: 1736:

Thanks. I did not knew before that TemplateTiger can also do a screening. I though it is just possible to look for specific parameters. However, the database is quite

3078:

sure it is visibly referenced in the article, and then forget about it unless you receive any comments (I see you already received some about the older entry). --

447: 2911: 2770: 2444:

You are right that there is a typo in Lemal's scheme, and I agree that some mention of the lack of keto-enol tautomerism in hexafluoroacetone could be helpful.

1527:

Sure, as long as it is clear. Perhaps the most straightforward way would be to add a note in parentheses. For example, something like "France (b. Poland)". --

1440:

to test myself and see how much I knew; I did fairly well, I guess. But I haven't done a chemistry article since! So, sorry, I think I'll pass on this one.

137:

significant contributions to the article. I made a suggestion and he mentioned that the subject of our disagreement had been "extensively discussed" on the

2944:. Please take the time to look over these proposals, and consider endorsing one of them, or writing one of your own. Thanks again for your participation! 689:

article. I knew you have gone through the FAC procedure previously and probably you could help with edits/comments in this process. Thank you in advance.

2415:

equilibrium constant would take into account the initial concentration of water (but I could be wrong as I am unmotivated to break out a book). Thanks. -

1737: 479:

On second thoughts, I am not now so convinced by the 'art-works argument'. I have looked at several Knowledge (XXG) pages concerning works of art by

73:(which doesn't have an article yet). I was wondering if you were planning an article on that soon? I noticed your sandbox, where you have CaCr2O7 with 3185: 2357:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 983:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 3299:

Hi itub. For the Osmium article it would be good if you can find out what the compound is which has the oxidation state -2. My suggestion would be Na

3199:

to signal if this is an appropriate placement and/or to make known your current thoughts on this matter. You may either participate in discussion at

2701:

There is a footnote explaining the situation, but if you can come up with a good way of incorporating it in the main text, you are welcome to try! --

2936:

Thank you for endorsing one or more summaries in the RFC. Please note that two proposals have been put forward on how we can move on after the RFC:

547:

We had earlier been trying to settle on wording to use for a guideline governing the unit symbol to use for the liter. There is now a vote, here at

3822:, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. 3792:

Thank you for all your hard work. May you wear the crowns well, and may the platinum crown motivate you to contribute more outstanding articles. –

2659:

you're right, i probably wasn't listening closely enough to established editors at certain times, however, I felt I had ample reason, as mentioned

2454:

acetone itself is highly reactive (extremely flammable). Same for reactivity towards fluorine, and probably some other oxidizing agents as well. --

3605: 2646:). i was simply explaining justified feelings towards an irrational harrassing editor. I am optimistic, considering our recent contributions to 3738: 3576:

A very cordial thanks for your very extensive contributions in chemistry. Would it be proper to ask whether you'd consider taking a look at

44: 40:

Therefore, the name change hasn't been completed, because the previous discussion wasn't widespread enough, nor announced in enough places.

1464: 504: 336: 304: 269: 3483: 2077:

As an Aerospace Engineer, I recognize that a perfect gas and ideal gas are fundamentally different. I have described these differences in

1026: 3107:. To include it on your user or talk page, please add {{Knowledge (XXG):Peer review/PRbox}} . Thanks again, and keep up the good work, 3099: 1299:, but I do agree with you that the importance tag is a better fit for this case (despite the silliness of the name; they're obviously 606:

Hi there, I don't mind you moving a page to change the punctuation in the title, but could you update the articles that link to this?

2151:

against you, but as long as you keep doing edits that don't improve the articles or go against consensus I will react accordingly. --

1821:

Hi, your name was on the list of volunteers as someone interested in physics and outer space. You might be interested in the article

1517:/France . That way, it would still conform the website, but would also avoid some of the inevitable edit wars that could crop up. -- 1410:

No. It is still under development, but I intend to use it for assisted editing rather than as a fully automated bot. If I understand

3819: 2277: 350:

I don't know about piperidine, but in cyclohexane, the boat conformation is not a minimum (although the twist conformation is). See

3772: 3062:

but so far they have not received any comment. If you have the time, your help in getting them promoted would be much appreciated.

411:

goes somewhere weird. I assume you refer to dimethylformamide? I know that by "DMF", perhaps DMFA is an alternate abbreviation. --

3051: 2918:. Since you had posted your views in the prior Request for Comment, I thought that you would want to know. You can see the RFC/U 1672: 1627: 1251:

Just to say I agree with both your name change and the removal of categories on this article - I had pondered both, but you were

685:

Hi, Ivan. I knew this is not exactly your field of wikiediting, but I would like to ask your help with the FAC nomination of the

1782:, if you know of any web resources (or non-web resources) that might be of use for expansion it would be appreciated. Thanks. -- 1229:

the term people are more likely to come across. In any case the first sentence of the article makes clear which ion is meant. --

2716:

confusion over whether the past or present name is being used, as well as removing the need for a footnote. what do you think?

730:, but since the author reverted it I think we'll have to go to AfD. Lame... By the way, if you liked this article, you'll love 2524: 3629: 3356: 2854:

P.S. Oh, and because I don't want you just going and saying it's fake, I want you to know that my actinium picture ] is also

878: 3689: 3104: 781:

On consideration, this would have been a totally inappropriate redirect. An appropriate title to redirect to Mn2O3 would be

2584: 2216: 2061: 45:

Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (proposals)#Proposal to rename the pages called List of basic x topics to Topic outline of x

1380: 3693: 3667: 299:

Was just a wind up. The original editors of such info have vulcanized brains. You should have seen the article before.

1633:

Hi Itub. How much work was it to extract these data from the chemboxes? I think it would be nice to have the same for

1208:

Sorry if I stepped on your toes. It wasn't my intention. My main concern with an "ion" title is that there is also a H

50: 1152:

You are definitly fast, I wanted to add the stuff, after I got home, but ... You might get it GA or even featured! --

34:

I'm contacting you because you were involved in the discussion concerning the renaming of the lists of basic topics.

2450:

I'm not convinced of the benefit of rounding the K's to one significant figure. What do we gain by losing precision?

1931:

A lot of discussion has been going on, but not in the place you might expect. The previous FAC discussion is now at

3009: 2774: 2358: 1604: 1513:

Do you think I could add the birth countries mentioned at the Nobel website, but italicize them, ie. Marie Curie |

984: 3674: 3337:. Probably in Comprehensive Organometallic Chem. I'll check later. Nice to see you around again, by the way. -- 523:

people to know who they are talking to if you post from different IP addresses. I'll post the rest of my reply at

3055: 786: 2165:

I apologize for being too bold. I have been very bold with my edits. I can easily see how it was interpreted as

704: 2730:

Sounds good to me. I didn't write the original text, so I certainly don't feel any "ownership" towards it... --

649:, so fixing the template fixes all those links (I just did that). There are only 10 links left after that... -- 351: 340: 308: 273: 508: 1634: 1436:

I would normally do it if it was something I was knowledgeable in, but chemistry isn't my strong suit. I did

2285: 1022: 3457: 2520: 2049: 3593: 3050:

Happy New Year, Ivan. I see that you are on the ball as usual with the added categories. I have submitted

2569: 2329: 955: 147: 3663: 782: 3637: 3171: 3137: 3059: 2792:

I'll figure out what I can say tomorrow. The situation really degenerated during the days I was away! --

2668: 2600: 2478: 2435: 2430:

Looks like a misprint (right?) on the piece as the hexafluoroacetone is de-fluorinated in the example. -

2420: 2345: 2238: 2224: 2205: 2178: 2170: 2136: 1296: 971: 853: 822: 794: 764: 731: 416: 111: 70: 2620: 2393:, and making it a disambiguation, with references in basic form. Please improve it as you see fit. -- 143: 2386: 607: 157:

I'm traveling so I don't have time to look at this in detail right now, but I'll take a look later. --

2470: 1799: 1787: 1355: 1167:

Outside the tags and minor MOS issues, do you think there is anything missing to submit it for GAN?

756: 686: 668: 615: 119: 82: 3699:

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

889:

Thanks for the note; I'll keep cleaning up categories that end up with user pages by accident. :) --

3529: 3342: 3200: 3112: 3067: 2999: 2980: 2812: 2749: 2721: 2691: 2639: 1955: 1904: 1451: 1308: 1260: 1121: 716: 3666:

on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a

3624:

Should the transactinide category be included as an additional color on the Knowledge (XXG) table?

1547:

I added stuff from iridium to the osmium article. Would be nice if you could have a look. Thanks!-

3799: 3782: 3704: 3366: 2915: 2845: 2660: 2352: 2281: 2095: 1884: 1867: 1838: 1822: 1279: 1017: 921: 873: 488: 470: 236: 138: 3768: 2615: 426:

Oops, my mistake. Acutally it would be better to type the full name, but I was a bit lazy. :) --

2663:

on why I thought there was something wrong with the "establishment" as i was experiencing it. -

2530:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

3746: 3589: 3353: 2863: 2835: 2565: 2408: 2057: 2045:

Thanks dear for giving this very use full link to edit.... in future I hope u support me....

1518: 1487: 1472: 1245: 1218: 1172: 3681: 2964: 2390: 1252: 727: 3633: 3167: 3133: 3020: 2664: 2596: 2474: 2431: 2416: 2399: 2369: 2234: 2220: 2201: 2174: 2132: 2025:

I'm sorry, but historical/nationalistic controversies of this sort are not my cup of tea. --

1374: 1332: 849: 818: 790: 760: 694: 643: 591: 578:

Something's wrong with that bot edit. It looks good but it doesn't work. I have reported it

563: 518:

I've seen it. Just so you know, I, and almost certainly Rifleman 82 and Smokefoot too, have

412: 390: 74: 3685: 2968: 2611: 2516: 2512: 1411: 1388: 814: 3651: 3442: 3417: 3379: 3312: 3290: 3276: 3246: 3015:

If you could weigh in on Petergans recent behavior with the article that would be great.--

2782: 2535: 2016: 1848:

I'll be away for a few days, but I'll see if I can take a look when I'm back next week. --

1783: 1586: 1552: 1351: 1157: 1098: 1064: 664: 611: 524: 218: 183: 115: 78: 3215:

or quick clarifications/affirmations based on several pre-written statements can be made

3824: 3719: 3613: 3559: 3545: 3525: 3338: 3262: 3225: 3204: 3192: 3153: 3108: 3083: 3063: 3035: 2995: 2976: 2893: 2808: 2797: 2745: 2735: 2717: 2706: 2687: 2628: 2459: 2311: 2253: 2196: 2156: 2111: 2086:

of difference between computational time. Please reconsider reverting your deletion of

2030: 1978: 1951: 1922: 1900: 1853: 1806: 1727: 1703: 1680: 1653: 1612: 1568: 1532: 1501: 1442: 1419: 1398: 1304: 1256: 1234: 1191: 1137: 1117: 1080: 1041: 1002: 936: 894: 837: 739: 712: 654: 630: 596: 532: 431: 359: 324: 289: 244: 199: 162: 97: 17: 3760: 2511:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

303:

heavy on conformational chemistry. Maybe include both, but with a little less detail?

3794: 3777: 3700: 3585: 3577: 3508: 3471: 2949: 2927: 2549:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 2303: 2091: 1880: 1863: 1834: 1779: 1275: 917: 484: 466: 3132:

just wanted to say hello and that your absence has been noticed. hope all is well. -

3742: 2874: 2859: 2831: 2551: 2127: 2053: 1830: 1214: 1168: 962: 3581: 3482: 3016: 2394: 2336: 2087: 2082: 1605:

http://www.bigtimeattic.com/blog/2007/01/i-wish-someone-would-invent-osmium.html

1370: 1328: 690: 584: 558: 385: 375: 3688:, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see 2500: 1933:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Acid dissociation constant/archive1

3834: 3803: 3786: 3750: 3723: 3708: 3641: 3617: 3597: 3563: 3549: 3533: 3510: 3473: 3446: 3438: 3421: 3413: 3346: 3316: 3308: 3294: 3286: 3280: 3272: 3266: 3250: 3242: 3227: 3175: 3157: 3141: 3122: 3087: 3071: 3039: 3024: 3003: 2984: 2953: 2931: 2897: 2878: 2867: 2839: 2816: 2801: 2786: 2778: 2753: 2739: 2725: 2710: 2695: 2672: 2632: 2604: 2573: 2482: 2463: 2439: 2424: 2402: 2375: 2315: 2289: 2276:

about the table of LaTeX symbols. I have proposed including the new layout at

2257: 2242: 2228: 2209: 2182: 2160: 2140: 2115: 2099: 2065: 2034: 2019: 1982: 1959: 1926: 1908: 1888: 1871: 1857: 1842: 1810: 1791: 1753: 1744: 1731: 1716: 1707: 1693: 1684: 1666: 1657: 1641: 1616: 1590: 1582: 1572: 1556: 1548: 1536: 1521: 1505: 1490: 1475: 1458: 1423: 1402: 1359: 1336: 1312: 1283: 1264: 1238: 1222: 1195: 1176: 1161: 1153: 1141: 1125: 1102: 1094: 1084: 1068: 1060: 1045: 1031: 1010: 940: 925: 898: 883: 857: 841: 826: 798: 768: 743: 726:

I'd love to get this removed, but I have no administrative authority. I tried

720: 698: 672: 658: 634: 619: 568: 536: 519: 512: 492: 474: 435: 420: 395: 363: 344: 328: 312: 293: 277: 248: 222: 214: 203: 187: 179: 166: 151: 123: 101: 86: 55: 3739:

Knowledge (XXG):Triple_Crown/Nominations#Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Elements

3715: 3609: 3555: 3541: 3258: 3220: 3149: 3079: 3031: 2889: 2793: 2731: 2702: 2624: 2455: 2307: 2249: 2152: 2107: 2026: 1974: 1918: 1849: 1802: 1750: 1741: 1723: 1713: 1699: 1690: 1676: 1663: 1649: 1638: 1608: 1564: 1528: 1497: 1437: 1415: 1393: 1289: 1230: 1187: 1133: 1076: 1037: 994: 932: 912:

Good to finally meet you in Philly! Thanks a lot for making time for that.

890: 833: 735: 650: 626: 528: 427: 355: 320: 285: 240: 195: 158: 93: 2591:

for that editor. can you please help me out as i have had to deal with the

1939: 1936: 753: 3030:

It would be helpful if you said what it is that you find objectionable. --

3765: 3498: 3461: 2945: 2923: 2647: 978: 2302:

Hi Itub, you were recommended for advice, can you please have a look at

1915: 1879:

Thank you for your review. I have posted a response on the review page.

2545: 2508: 2494: 480: 2583:

perhaps i shouldn't have said it (according to some policy) but i did

446:

Given your interest I would like your opinion on deleting the section

3238: 268:

and Piperidilbenzilates. I added these, it was so educational *sigh*

265: 1295:

Re: the tag issue, you might want to see my expanded explanation at

579: 2146:

I don't care about the debating style; I care about the hardheaded

3759: 2610:

I don't think your comment will be helpful and it appears to be a

3680:

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

3191:

Please be advised that I have recently conducted a review of the

2744:

k i'll change it and see what happens. thanks for your input xxx

2994:

Well, I shouldn't have said a thing.... Have a nice holiday. --

2643: 2340: 1387:

Has this bot been approved for use? It showed up in a report at

966: 408: 3207:; but to keep things in one place, you should also clarify at 2078: 462: 448:

On the Equilibrium of Heterogeneous Substances#Collector value

442:

On the Equilibrium of Heterogeneous Substances#Collector value

3554:

OK, I see you had already added some review references. :) --

2473:

page is looking very nice, good job on adding that content. -

759:(Mn2O3)? Itub: Thanks for catching my circular redir, btw. -- 3650: 2967:

this article, you may be interested in participating in the

2555:

explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for

2521:

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

2499: 2005:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Peer review/Islamic Golden Age/archive1

3692:). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found 2173:. Thank you for your patience with me as I learn. Thanks. - 2010:

The article makes lots of claims that need to be assessed.

1749:

All chemboxes i.e. their parameters have been fixed now. --

1324:

WT:Only_make_links_that_are_relevant_to_the_context#Break 1

639:

The good news is that most of these links were a result of

2219:. I hope you see the same logic in it that I do. Thanks. - 37:

I ran into resistance when I attempted to rename the set.

3764:

Your Majesty, I am pleased to award this special edition

625:

Isn't that what the redirect left by the move is for? --

2272:

Dear Itub, thank you very much for your opinion at the

1482: 1347: 868: 555:

with any guideline’s wording. I hope to see you there.

178:

article! If you have others you like to have? Thanks --

66: 2560:

that if the article does get deleted, you can contact

3673:

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

3437:

Found two good refs and added them to the article! --

2106:

lots of books that make that explicit assertion). --

2595:

thought of his/her potential return to wikipedia? -

2519:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please 1414:

correctly I don't need approval for that, right? --

455:

Talk:On the Equilibrium of Heterogeneous Substances

3580:and especially the article upon which it depends, 3209:Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review/addendum 2771:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates 2126:Itub, I want to apologize for my comment at the 65:Hi there. I came across a redirect you created: 3818:A deletion discussion has just been created at 752:Done with (CO2)2. A quick google search showed 3820:Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures 2773:FAC status and the problems with ther lead of 2513:section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion 2278:m:Help talk:Displaying a formula#LaTeX symbols 2546:the page that has been nominated for deletion 2169:bold to the point of offense. I also replied 1862:Cool, thanks. I look forward to your review. 1093:I already asked them but got no response jet. 549:Straw poll on unit symbol usage for the liter 110:OK. Done. Someone should write an article on 8: 3670:at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC). 2564:to request that a copy be emailed to you. 663:That's good. Thanks for dealing with them. 3658:Hello. Your account has been granted the " 3606:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Chemistry 2324: 2215:I think I made a pretty good argument for 950: 3186:Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review 2844: 2349:was updated with a fact from the article 2003:Can you take a look at this PR talk page 1801:) But you knew that already, I'm sure. -- 975:was updated with a fact from the article 813:RE: Smokefoot's request. Should this be 3584:? As is obvious from the talk page for 2873:I had some problems with the images of 2525:notability guideline for musical topics 1712:Thanks. There is of course no hurry. -- 1673:de:Benutzer:Itub/Chembox property count 3480: 3375: 3364: 3100:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review/volunteers 114:though, and then it can be recreated! 993:Thank you for your contributions! -- 553:just what it is we hope to accomplish 7: 2000:I noticed your name in the PR list. 1698:Sure, I'll look at that tomorrow. -- 1465:List of Nobel laureates in Chemistry 1255:and did them. Thanks, and regards, 3628:Your thoughts would be appreciated 2912:request for comment on user conduct 2766:The FAC acid dissociation constant 1675:. Feel free to translate it! ;-) -- 1327:the devil is in the details. - Dan 1054:New Image Periodic Table by Quality 3775:and its hardworking volunteers. – 2914:has recently been filed regarding 2523:, as well as our subject-specific 2306:and join the disccussion ? Thanks 24: 3756:WikiProject Elements Triple Crown 3690:Knowledge (XXG):Reviewing process 3196:(formerly Rorschach inkblot test) 2131:fluorocarbon talk page. Thanks. - 1829:. Gerard K. O'Neill invented the 43:I've submitted a new proposal at 3813: 3662:" userright, allowing you to to 3481: 3211:. Longer statements may be made 3052:stability constants of complexes 2328: 1628:User:Itub/Chembox property count 1481:In response to your comment, is 954: 453:My contribution reproduced from 374:I note that you recently edited 3608:to see if anyone volunteers. -- 3456:Thank you for your comments at 2587:. i cannot help but to have an 1297:User talk:Rifleman 82#Isis/DRAW 457:page to avoid 'fragmentation': 335:surrounding conformations are. 3618:16:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 3598:02:26, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 3497:To Itub, for polite dialogue. 1284:16:10, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 1265:08:13, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 1239:08:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1223:07:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1196:09:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 1177:21:41, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1162:16:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 1142:05:48, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 1126:03:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 1103:09:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 1085:06:30, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 1069:21:20, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 1046:05:42, 14 September 2008 (UTC) 1032:13:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 1011:08:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 941:05:44, 14 September 2008 (UTC) 926:05:42, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 899:05:46, 14 September 2008 (UTC) 543:Vote on unit symbols for liter 1: 3237:Hi Itub, I wanted to get the 3123:04:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 3058:(Dec 29) as new articles at 3040:18:47, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 3025:18:30, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 3004:22:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC) 2985:18:19, 19 December 2008 (UTC) 2954:03:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC) 2825:Protactinium Image by Vuerqex 2787:22:02, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 2754:16:46, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 2740:19:57, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 2726:18:29, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 2711:17:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 2696:17:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 2673:22:23, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 2633:10:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 2605:06:39, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 2574:06:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 2483:21:57, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 2464:06:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 2440:01:11, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 2425:00:42, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 2403:16:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 2376:00:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 2316:21:19, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 2290:14:34, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 2258:09:30, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 2243:01:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 2229:01:26, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 2210:01:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 2183:01:26, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 2161:06:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 2141:03:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 2041:Thanks for giving me Guidance 1889:06:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 1635:de:Vorlage:Infobox Chemikalie 884:19:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 858:00:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 842:18:51, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 827:17:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 799:17:41, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 769:17:25, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 744:16:58, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 721:16:54, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 3804:10:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC) 3787:10:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC) 3751:06:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 2932:00:33, 6 December 2008 (UTC) 2898:09:07, 6 December 2008 (UTC) 2879:22:05, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 2868:04:45, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 2840:04:29, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 2817:11:05, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 2802:22:48, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 2517:criteria for speedy deletion 2304:Talk:Hydrogen#Split_proposal 2298:Talk:Hydrogen#Split_proposal 2116:05:08, 8 November 2008 (UTC) 2100:19:15, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 2066:11:03, 31 October 2008 (UTC) 2035:18:51, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 2020:16:24, 25 October 2008 (UTC) 1983:09:47, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 1960:08:54, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 1927:18:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 1909:16:54, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 1872:05:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 1858:05:21, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 1843:04:44, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 1811:06:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 1792:05:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 1754:16:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 1745:10:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 1732:09:10, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 1717:18:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 1708:18:29, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 1694:18:26, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 1685:17:15, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 1667:15:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 1658:15:19, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 1642:15:13, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 1617:13:23, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 1591:07:07, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1573:06:27, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1557:17:49, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1537:13:19, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 1522:17:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 1506:16:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 1491:15:47, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 1476:23:13, 14 October 2008 (UTC) 3519:Metal Ions in Life Sciences 3088:14:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 3072:10:04, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 2959:Bayesian Kepler Periodogram 1993:PR on extraordinary article 1459:16:10, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 1424:16:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 1403:16:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 1360:23:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 1337:19:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 1313:14:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 787:manganese(II) manganate(IV) 699:13:48, 15 August 2008 (UTC) 673:16:21, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 659:16:20, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 635:16:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 620:16:10, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 597:06:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 61:Calcium dichromate redirect 27:Proposal discussion resumed 3850: 3285:Nominated osmium for GA.-- 3010:Acid dissociation constant 2775:acid dissociation constant 2321:DYK for Sabatier principle 705:Manganese(II)manganate(VI) 569:22:56, 3 August 2008 (UTC) 537:05:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 513:02:13, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 132:Acid Dissociation Constant 3835:22:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC) 3724:02:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC) 3709:17:28, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 3664:review other users' edits 3511:20:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 3487: 3474:20:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 3447:09:52, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 3422:14:07, 14 June 2009 (UTC) 3347:13:25, 14 June 2009 (UTC) 3317:18:25, 13 June 2009 (UTC) 3295:18:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC) 3098:Thanks for signing up at 3056:polyamino carboxylic acid 2507:A tag has been placed on 2073:Ideal Gas vs. Perfect Gas 1603:You may like this comic: 867:A couple months back you 493:16:52, 30 July 2008 (UTC) 475:16:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC) 436:05:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC) 421:05:40, 29 July 2008 (UTC) 396:19:56, 26 July 2008 (UTC) 364:06:20, 27 July 2008 (UTC) 345:10:18, 26 July 2008 (UTC) 329:06:19, 26 July 2008 (UTC) 313:03:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC) 294:11:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 278:10:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 249:09:08, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 223:09:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 204:08:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 188:08:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 167:11:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC) 152:15:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC) 124:05:55, 11 July 2008 (UTC) 102:05:48, 11 July 2008 (UTC) 87:23:19, 10 July 2008 (UTC) 3733:WP Elements Triple Crown 3642:14:28, 23 May 2010 (UTC) 3564:12:48, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 3550:11:52, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 3534:07:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 3281:19:36, 6 June 2009 (UTC) 3267:18:52, 6 June 2009 (UTC) 3251:18:46, 5 June 2009 (UTC) 3228:14:55, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 3176:03:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 3158:00:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC) 3142:23:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC) 2847:File:91 Protactinium.jpg 755:. Should we redirect to 465:copy I have?... ;-) -- 352:cyclohexane conformation 173:Julius Adolph Stöckhardt 56:06:36, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 3809:Proposed Image Deletion 2359:Did you know? talk page 2217:organofluorine compound 985:Did you know? talk page 3789: 3655: 3647:You are now a Reviewer 3572:Help with Salt_bridge? 3060:Template:Did you know‎ 2504: 1935:. Please also look at 1817:Peer review invitation 1204:Hydrogen molecular ion 573: 3763: 3654: 3201:the article talk page 2777:is discussed there.-- 2503: 2389:by moving it back to 2385:I've tried to rescue 2013:Thank you very much. 1899:FAC discussion page. 1831:particle storage ring 1270:Corticostriate fibers 3773:WikiProject Elements 3384:page 64 gives Os(CO) 3094:Thanks and a request 2942:Randomran's proposal 2621:there is no deadline 2471:carbon-fluorine bond 1950:recent discussions. 1016:Congratulations! ;) 757:Manganese(III) oxide 687:Oil shale extraction 681:Oil shale extraction 3203:or leave a note at 3103:which can be found 2938:Casliber's proposal 2906:Gavin.collins RFC/U 2562:one of these admins 2493:Speedy deletion of 2274:deletion discussion 1825:, currently up for 1778:Thanks for tagging 783:manganese manganate 380:HERE on Talk:MOSNUM 3790: 3656: 2505: 2353:Sabatier principle 2081:. The article for 1496:in the website. -- 1303:notability tags). 863:Thanks for gnoming 732:dicarbon tetroxide 401:N-Formylpiperidine 237:User:Itub/Chemists 139:law of mass action 112:calcium dichromate 71:calcium dichromate 69:, which points at 3668:a two-month trial 3516: 3515: 3374:Missing or empty 3219:. Best regards, – 3119: 2409:Hexafluoroacetone 2365: 2364: 2195:Itub, I know the 2069: 2052:comment added by 1823:Gerard K. O'Neill 1246:Balance of nature 1030: 991: 990: 882: 728:proposed deletion 52:The Transhumanist 3841: 3831: 3829: 3817: 3816: 3661: 3507: 3503: 3485: 3478: 3477: 3470: 3466: 3383: 3377: 3372: 3370: 3362: 3321:That would be Na 3117: 2850: 2848: 2589:extreme distaste 2541: 2540: 2534: 2397: 2387:Thermic reaction 2374: 2372: 2371:User:Ameliorate! 2332: 2325: 2068: 2046: 1662:Sounds great! -- 1457: 1454: 1445: 1020: 1005: 997: 958: 951: 876: 648: 642: 567: 394: 370:Symbol for liter 75:calcium chromate 3849: 3848: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3827: 3825: 3814: 3811: 3758: 3735: 3659: 3649: 3626: 3574: 3521: 3505: 3499: 3468: 3462: 3460:. Best wishes. 3454: 3411: 3407: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3373: 3363: 3359: 3351: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3306: 3302: 3235: 3189: 3166:good to hear. - 3130: 3116: 3096: 3048: 3013: 2992: 2961: 2908: 2846: 2827: 2768: 2683: 2612:personal attack 2581: 2538: 2532: 2531: 2498: 2412: 2395: 2383: 2370: 2367: 2323: 2300: 2270: 2193: 2124: 2075: 2047: 2043: 1995: 1896: 1819: 1776: 1631: 1545: 1468: 1452: 1443: 1441: 1434: 1432:Re: GAN request 1367: 1344: 1320: 1293: 1272: 1249: 1211: 1206: 1150: 1113: 1056: 1003: 995: 949: 907: 865: 811: 708: 683: 646: 640: 604: 576: 556: 545: 525:Talk:Piperidine 500: 495: 477: 444: 403: 383: 372: 261: 235:I just created 175: 134: 63: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3847: 3845: 3810: 3807: 3757: 3754: 3734: 3731: 3729: 3727: 3726: 3686:BLP violations 3648: 3645: 3625: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3573: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3520: 3517: 3514: 3513: 3494: 3493: 3491:Civility Award 3488: 3486: 3453: 3450: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3357: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3304: 3300: 3234: 3231: 3193:Rorschach test 3188: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3161: 3160: 3129: 3126: 3113: 3095: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3054:(Dec. 28) and 3047: 3046:DYK candidates 3044: 3043: 3042: 3012: 3007: 2991: 2988: 2960: 2957: 2907: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2882: 2881: 2853: 2826: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2767: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2682: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2580: 2577: 2497: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2451: 2448: 2445: 2411: 2406: 2382: 2381:Thermic rescue 2379: 2363: 2362: 2333: 2322: 2319: 2299: 2296: 2294: 2269: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2197:organofluorine 2192: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2123: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2074: 2071: 2042: 2039: 2038: 2037: 1994: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1895: 1892: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1818: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1775: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1747: 1630: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1576: 1575: 1544: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1467: 1462: 1433: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1385: 1384: 1366: 1363: 1343: 1340: 1319: 1318:Merge proposal 1316: 1292: 1287: 1271: 1268: 1248: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1209: 1205: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1180: 1179: 1149: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1112: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1088: 1087: 1055: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 989: 988: 959: 948: 945: 944: 943: 906: 903: 902: 901: 864: 861: 845: 844: 810: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 801: 774: 773: 772: 771: 747: 746: 707: 702: 682: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 637: 603: 600: 575: 572: 544: 541: 540: 539: 505:70.137.164.136 499: 496: 478: 459: 443: 440: 439: 438: 402: 399: 371: 368: 367: 366: 337:70.137.181.232 332: 331: 305:70.137.181.232 297: 296: 270:70.137.181.232 260: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 252: 251: 228: 227: 226: 225: 207: 206: 174: 171: 170: 169: 133: 130: 129: 128: 127: 126: 105: 104: 62: 59: 28: 25: 23: 18:User talk:Itub 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3846: 3837: 3836: 3833: 3832: 3821: 3808: 3806: 3805: 3801: 3797: 3796: 3788: 3784: 3780: 3779: 3774: 3770: 3767: 3762: 3755: 3753: 3752: 3748: 3744: 3740: 3732: 3730: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3714:Thank you! -- 3713: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3697: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3678: 3676: 3675:autoconfirmed 3671: 3669: 3665: 3653: 3646: 3644: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3623: 3619: 3615: 3611: 3607: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3587: 3586:Galvanic_cell 3583: 3579: 3578:Galvanic_cell 3571: 3565: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3518: 3512: 3509: 3504: 3502: 3496: 3495: 3492: 3489: 3484: 3479: 3476: 3475: 3472: 3467: 3465: 3459: 3451: 3449: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3423: 3419: 3415: 3381: 3368: 3360: 3355: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3344: 3340: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3240: 3232: 3230: 3229: 3226: 3224: 3223: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3202: 3197: 3194: 3187: 3183: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3139: 3135: 3127: 3125: 3124: 3121: 3120: 3110: 3106: 3101: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3081: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3033: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3011: 3008: 3006: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2989: 2987: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2963:Since you de- 2958: 2956: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2939: 2934: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2922:. Thank you. 2921: 2917: 2916:Gavin.collins 2913: 2905: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2857: 2851: 2849: 2842: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2824: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2765: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2680: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2578: 2576: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2558: 2554: 2553: 2552:the talk page 2548: 2547: 2537: 2528: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2502: 2496: 2492: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2452: 2449: 2446: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2410: 2407: 2405: 2404: 2401: 2398: 2392: 2388: 2380: 2378: 2377: 2373: 2360: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2348: 2347: 2346:Did you know? 2342: 2338: 2334: 2331: 2327: 2326: 2320: 2318: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2297: 2295: 2292: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2280:. Regards, -- 2279: 2275: 2268:LaTeX symbols 2267: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2198: 2190: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2149: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2129: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2084: 2080: 2072: 2070: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2018: 2014: 2011: 2008: 2006: 2001: 1998: 1992: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1940: 1937: 1934: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1914:According to 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1893: 1891: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1780:QL (chemical) 1773: 1755: 1752: 1748: 1746: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1715: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1692: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1665: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1640: 1636: 1629: 1626: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1520: 1516: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1489: 1484: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1474: 1466: 1463: 1461: 1460: 1455: 1449: 1448: 1439: 1431: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1395: 1390: 1382: 1379: 1376: 1372: 1369: 1368: 1364: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1346:An old reply 1341: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1325: 1317: 1315: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1291: 1288: 1286: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1269: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1247: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1203: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1110: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1053: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1036:Thanks! :) -- 1035: 1034: 1033: 1028: 1024: 1019: 1018:Fvasconcellos 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1008: 1007: 1006: 998: 986: 982: 981: 980: 974: 973: 972:Did you know? 968: 964: 960: 957: 953: 952: 946: 942: 938: 934: 930: 929: 928: 927: 923: 919: 913: 910: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 887: 886: 885: 880: 875: 870: 862: 860: 859: 855: 851: 843: 839: 835: 831: 830: 829: 828: 824: 820: 816: 808: 800: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 770: 766: 762: 758: 754: 751: 750: 749: 748: 745: 741: 737: 733: 729: 725: 724: 723: 722: 718: 714: 706: 703: 701: 700: 696: 692: 688: 680: 674: 670: 666: 662: 661: 660: 656: 652: 645: 638: 636: 632: 628: 624: 623: 622: 621: 617: 613: 610:. Thank you! 609: 601: 599: 598: 595: 594: 589: 588: 587: 581: 571: 570: 565: 561: 560: 554: 551:to settle on 550: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 521: 517: 516: 515: 514: 510: 506: 497: 494: 490: 486: 482: 476: 472: 468: 464: 458: 456: 451: 449: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 424: 423: 422: 418: 414: 410: 406: 400: 398: 397: 392: 388: 387: 381: 377: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 348: 347: 346: 342: 338: 330: 326: 322: 317: 316: 315: 314: 310: 306: 300: 295: 291: 287: 282: 281: 280: 279: 275: 271: 267: 258: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 233: 232: 231: 230: 229: 224: 220: 216: 211: 210: 209: 208: 205: 201: 197: 192: 191: 190: 189: 185: 181: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 155: 154: 153: 149: 145: 140: 131: 125: 121: 117: 113: 109: 108: 107: 106: 103: 99: 95: 91: 90: 89: 88: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 60: 58: 57: 54: 53: 48: 46: 41: 38: 35: 32: 26: 19: 3823: 3812: 3793: 3791: 3776: 3769:triple crown 3736: 3728: 3698: 3679: 3672: 3657: 3627: 3590:Ohiostandard 3575: 3522: 3500: 3490: 3463: 3455: 3436: 3236: 3221: 3205:my talk page 3195: 3190: 3131: 3111: 3097: 3049: 3014: 2993: 2962: 2935: 2909: 2875:user:Vuerqex 2855: 2852: 2843: 2828: 2769: 2684: 2681:erbia/terbia 2592: 2588: 2582: 2566:Badger Drink 2556: 2550: 2543: 2529: 2506: 2413: 2384: 2366: 2351: 2350: 2344: 2301: 2293: 2271: 2194: 2166: 2147: 2128:fluorocarbon 2125: 2076: 2044: 2015: 2012: 2009: 2002: 1999: 1996: 1897: 1878: 1820: 1777: 1632: 1546: 1514: 1512: 1469: 1446: 1435: 1392: 1386: 1377: 1345: 1333:send/receive 1321: 1300: 1294: 1273: 1250: 1207: 1151: 1114: 1057: 1001: 1000: 992: 977: 976: 970: 963:13 September 914: 911: 908: 866: 846: 812: 709: 684: 605: 592: 585: 583: 577: 574:You're right 557: 552: 546: 501: 452: 445: 407: 404: 384: 373: 333: 301: 298: 262: 176: 144:EagleFalconn 135: 64: 51: 49: 42: 39: 36: 33: 30: 3634:Flying Jazz 3582:Salt_bridge 3184:A note re: 3168:Shootbamboo 3134:Shootbamboo 2971:discussion 2665:Shootbamboo 2597:Shootbamboo 2544:the top of 2475:Shootbamboo 2432:Shootbamboo 2417:Shootbamboo 2337:18 November 2235:Shootbamboo 2221:Shootbamboo 2202:Shootbamboo 2175:Shootbamboo 2167:exceedingly 2133:Shootbamboo 2088:Perfect gas 2083:Perfect gas 2048:—Preceding 1894:ΔG standard 1322:Please see 1111:IUPAC thing 947:9/13/08 DYK 850:Rifleman 82 819:Rifleman 82 791:Rifleman 82 761:Rifleman 82 665:Tim Vickers 612:Tim Vickers 602:Moving page 413:Rifleman 82 376:Cyclohexane 3358:389308116X 2017:Cesar Tort 1784:IvoShandor 1352:Carcharoth 520:Piperidine 498:Piperidine 259:Piperidine 116:Carcharoth 79:Carcharoth 3682:vandalism 3526:Petergans 3367:cite book 3339:Smokefoot 3115:<: --> 3109:Ruhrfisch 3064:Petergans 2996:Smokefoot 2977:Icalanise 2910:Hello. A 2809:Petergans 2746:Jessi1989 2718:Jessi1989 2688:Jessi1989 2090:. Thanks 1952:Petergans 1901:Petergans 1438:Noble gas 1342:Old reply 1305:Propaniac 1290:ISIS/Draw 1257:TrulyBlue 1118:Smokefoot 815:rectified 713:Smokefoot 405:Hey Itub 3795:SMasters 3778:SMasters 3766:platinum 3701:Karanacs 3660:reviewer 3458:WT:CHEMS 3452:Barnstar 3329:, not Na 2648:fluorine 2616:WP:CHEMS 2092:Katanada 2062:contribs 2050:unsigned 2007:please? 1881:Wronkiew 1864:Wronkiew 1835:Wronkiew 1519:Scorpion 1488:Scorpion 1473:Scorpion 1381:contribs 1276:Looie496 979:Cardanol 918:Walkerma 874:Eldereft 734:! ;-) -- 485:Spud Gun 467:Spud Gun 3743:Nergaal 3376:|title= 2965:PRODded 2860:Vuerqex 2832:Vuerqex 2593:painful 2509:Droogie 2495:Droogie 2391:Thermic 2191:Merging 2148:editing 2122:Apology 2054:Dr.Soft 1997:Hello, 1215:Nergaal 1169:Nergaal 1148:Iridium 905:Apology 644:Enzymes 481:Picasso 67:CaCr2O7 3830:jones 3333:Os(CO) 3325:Os(CO) 3303:Os(CO) 3239:Osmium 3233:Osmium 3017:Jorfer 2969:WP:AfD 2557:speedy 2536:hangon 2396:Zigger 2282:Julian 1827:review 1543:Osmium 1515:Poland 1412:WP:BOT 1389:WP:UAA 1371:Itubot 1365:Itubot 1329:Dank55 1116:you.-- 909:Itub, 691:Beagel 586:Fyslee 559:Greg L 386:Greg L 266:Ditran 3737:See: 3439:Stone 3414:Stone 3309:Stone 3287:Stone 3273:Stone 3243:Stone 3128:hello 3114:: --> 2990:Jeesh 2779:Stone 1583:Stone 1549:Stone 1154:Stone 1095:Stone 1061:Stone 879:cont. 869:fixed 785:, or 582:. -- 215:Stone 180:Stone 16:< 3800:talk 3783:talk 3747:talk 3720:talk 3716:Itub 3705:talk 3694:here 3638:talk 3630:here 3614:talk 3610:Itub 3594:talk 3560:talk 3556:Itub 3546:talk 3542:Itub 3530:talk 3443:talk 3418:talk 3408:(CO) 3404:; Os 3400:(CO) 3396:; Os 3392:(CO) 3388:; Os 3380:help 3354:ISBN 3343:talk 3313:talk 3291:talk 3277:talk 3263:talk 3259:Itub 3247:talk 3222:xeno 3217:here 3213:here 3172:talk 3154:talk 3150:Itub 3138:talk 3105:here 3084:talk 3080:Itub 3068:talk 3036:talk 3032:Itub 3021:talk 3000:talk 2981:talk 2973:here 2950:talk 2940:and 2928:talk 2920:here 2894:talk 2890:Itub 2864:talk 2856:real 2836:talk 2813:talk 2798:talk 2794:Itub 2783:talk 2750:talk 2736:talk 2732:Itub 2722:talk 2707:talk 2703:Itub 2692:talk 2669:talk 2661:here 2644:PFOA 2640:here 2629:talk 2625:Itub 2623:. -- 2601:talk 2585:here 2579:well 2570:talk 2479:talk 2460:talk 2456:Itub 2436:talk 2421:talk 2341:2008 2312:talk 2308:Mion 2286:talk 2254:talk 2250:Itub 2239:talk 2225:talk 2206:talk 2179:talk 2171:here 2157:talk 2153:Itub 2137:talk 2112:talk 2108:Itub 2096:talk 2058:talk 2031:talk 2027:Itub 1979:talk 1975:Itub 1956:talk 1923:talk 1919:Itub 1905:talk 1885:talk 1868:talk 1854:talk 1850:Itub 1839:talk 1807:talk 1803:Itub 1798:top. 1788:talk 1751:Leyo 1742:Leyo 1740:. -- 1728:talk 1724:Itub 1714:Leyo 1704:talk 1700:Itub 1691:Leyo 1681:talk 1677:Itub 1671:See 1664:Leyo 1654:talk 1650:Itub 1639:Leyo 1637:. -- 1613:talk 1609:Itub 1607:. -- 1587:talk 1569:talk 1565:Itub 1553:talk 1533:talk 1529:Itub 1502:talk 1498:Itub 1483:this 1453:talk 1447:King 1444:Gary 1420:talk 1416:Itub 1399:talk 1394:Cirt 1375:talk 1356:talk 1348:here 1309:talk 1301:both 1280:talk 1261:talk 1253:bold 1235:talk 1231:Itub 1219:talk 1192:talk 1188:Itub 1173:talk 1158:talk 1138:talk 1134:Itub 1122:talk 1099:talk 1081:talk 1077:Itub 1065:talk 1042:talk 1038:Itub 1004:talk 996:RyRy 967:2008 937:talk 933:Itub 922:talk 895:talk 891:Itub 854:talk 838:talk 834:Itub 823:talk 817:? -- 809:RFA? 795:talk 765:talk 740:talk 736:Itub 717:talk 695:talk 669:talk 655:talk 651:Itub 631:talk 627:Itub 616:talk 608:list 593:talk 580:here 564:talk 533:talk 529:Itub 527:. -- 509:talk 489:talk 471:talk 432:talk 428:Itub 417:talk 409:DMFA 391:talk 360:talk 356:Itub 341:talk 325:talk 321:Itub 309:talk 290:talk 286:Itub 274:talk 245:talk 241:Itub 219:talk 200:talk 196:Itub 184:talk 163:talk 159:Itub 148:talk 120:talk 98:talk 94:Itub 83:talk 31:Hi. 3826:Ron 3771:to 3684:or 3501:Axl 3464:Axl 2946:BOZ 2924:BOZ 2542:to 2527:. 2400:«º» 2335:On 2079:Gas 1938:and 1738:old 961:On 463:PDF 450:. 3802:) 3785:) 3749:) 3741:. 3722:) 3707:) 3696:. 3640:) 3632:. 3616:) 3596:) 3562:) 3548:) 3532:) 3445:) 3420:) 3412:-- 3410:18 3402:15 3394:11 3371:: 3369:}} 3365:{{ 3352:. 3345:) 3315:) 3293:) 3279:) 3265:) 3249:) 3174:) 3156:) 3140:) 3086:) 3070:) 3038:) 3023:) 3002:) 2983:) 2975:. 2952:) 2930:) 2896:) 2888:-- 2866:) 2858:! 2838:) 2815:) 2800:) 2785:) 2752:) 2738:) 2724:) 2709:) 2694:) 2671:) 2631:) 2603:) 2572:) 2539:}} 2533:{{ 2481:) 2462:) 2438:) 2423:) 2368:~ 2361:. 2343:, 2339:, 2314:) 2288:) 2256:) 2248:-- 2241:) 2227:) 2208:) 2181:) 2159:) 2139:) 2114:) 2098:) 2064:) 2060:• 2033:) 1981:) 1958:) 1925:) 1907:) 1887:) 1870:) 1856:) 1841:) 1809:) 1790:) 1774:QL 1730:) 1722:-- 1706:) 1683:) 1656:) 1648:-- 1615:) 1589:) 1571:) 1555:) 1535:) 1504:) 1422:) 1401:) 1391:. 1358:) 1350:. 1335:) 1311:) 1282:) 1263:) 1237:) 1221:) 1194:) 1186:-- 1175:) 1160:) 1140:) 1124:) 1101:) 1083:) 1075:-- 1067:) 1059:-- 1044:) 1009:) 987:. 969:, 965:, 939:) 924:) 897:) 856:) 848:-- 840:) 825:) 797:) 767:) 742:) 719:) 711:-- 697:) 671:) 657:) 647:}} 641:{{ 633:) 618:) 590:/ 535:) 511:) 491:) 473:) 434:) 419:) 362:) 343:) 327:) 311:) 292:) 284:-- 276:) 247:) 221:) 202:) 194:-- 186:) 165:) 150:) 122:) 100:) 85:) 47:. 3828:h 3798:( 3781:( 3745:( 3718:( 3703:( 3636:( 3612:( 3592:( 3558:( 3544:( 3528:( 3506:¤ 3469:¤ 3441:( 3416:( 3406:6 3398:5 3390:3 3386:4 3382:) 3378:( 3361:. 3341:( 3335:5 3331:2 3327:4 3323:2 3311:( 3305:5 3301:2 3289:( 3275:( 3261:( 3245:( 3170:( 3152:( 3136:( 3118:° 3082:( 3066:( 3034:( 3019:( 2998:( 2979:( 2948:( 2926:( 2892:( 2862:( 2834:( 2811:( 2796:( 2781:( 2748:( 2734:( 2720:( 2705:( 2690:( 2667:( 2627:( 2599:( 2568:( 2477:( 2458:( 2434:( 2419:( 2310:( 2284:( 2252:( 2237:( 2223:( 2204:( 2200:- 2177:( 2155:( 2135:( 2110:( 2094:( 2056:( 2029:( 1977:( 1954:( 1921:( 1903:( 1883:( 1866:( 1852:( 1837:( 1805:( 1786:( 1726:( 1702:( 1679:( 1652:( 1611:( 1585:( 1567:( 1551:( 1531:( 1500:( 1456:) 1450:( 1418:( 1397:( 1383:) 1378:· 1373:( 1354:( 1331:( 1307:( 1278:( 1259:( 1233:( 1217:( 1210:2 1190:( 1171:( 1156:( 1136:( 1120:( 1097:( 1079:( 1063:( 1040:( 1029:) 1027:c 1025:· 1023:t 1021:( 999:( 935:( 920:( 893:( 881:) 877:( 852:( 836:( 821:( 793:( 763:( 738:( 715:( 693:( 667:( 653:( 629:( 614:( 566:) 562:( 531:( 507:( 487:( 469:( 430:( 415:( 393:) 389:( 358:( 339:( 323:( 307:( 288:( 272:( 243:( 217:( 198:( 182:( 161:( 146:( 118:( 96:( 81:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index