User talk:JFG/Archive 2016

3079:, thanks for your message. I skimmed your draft and it definitely looks like an improvement: you do write good prose. In my experience, it's difficult to make sweeping changes but it is possible to make piecemeal changes with your overall structure in mind, inching towards a better article at each step. You may find both criticism and improvements coming from other editors as you go. Most of the heated discussions are focused on controversial issues of the day, heavily depending on the US news cycle; for example, you might be able to edit quietly and constructively on Trump's real estate career when everybody is focused on his foreign policy, and vice versa. I would encourage you to remain active in the editing community rather than simply hand your draft to other people. Sure, this particular article won't be of FA caliber for quite a while but it's already come a long way from the train wreck it was just a few months ago. Just take it slow. 3483:

and also in terms of absolute noses (if consensus was 123aye/12nay last time that is FAR stronger than 3aye/2nay). I would also like to have the datestamp, or at least, the number of months elapsed, so people get a sense of whether or not it makes sense to bring up an issue again, at a given point in time. I've probably already requested too many additions, but on the theory that it is better to ask for a mile and accept an inch, it would be *very* nice if people who were visting the talkpage, and *thinking* about challenging some kind of standing consensus, could also add their own "notch to the stick" retroactively. So for example, the current tally at the RfC on whether to rewrite the 'many were false' statement, is roughly on the order of

2975:

the source-prose that it was "updated 2016-11-25" which is why I named the ref thataway. In other words, the politico tracker is adding and removing names as they get tips from transition insiders. The names that I plugged in were visible on the 25th of November or thereabouts, at the URL in question. So is it okay to keep them? Or once politico deletes them from their live tracker, we should also remove them here, on the assumption that their earlier info was found by them to be incorrect? Or is it okay to leave them in, perhaps adding a note that they were in the source at one point but no longer were as of mm/dd/yyyy?

2662:. I understand where you're coming from because I also pay a lot of attention to formatting for legibility and I have often applied nowrap tags on dates in tables for example. I agree with the benefits of keeping month and day together, less so for hyphenated words. Let me simulate a narrow screen, as experienced by the complaining editor, by placing line breaks in the text at the width limit, and displaying a side-by-side comparison of the flow. What's uglier? 42: 2440:, could you describe why it was closed as not moved (other than the !vote spread)? Your closing comment didn't elaborate. I was just curious because the request was consistent with established guidelines, deferred to reliable sources, sought consistency with like articles, etc., so I wanted to try to better understand what the stronger argument was that you saw on the other side. Thank you for any clarification! 2949:

prior to Trump becoming potus at the inauguration, but I don't know whether there is a rule about the Senate not holding the "final" vote on consenting to a nomination until post-inauguration. Doesn't change the conclusions you two came to agreement over with respect to your category-discussion, but figured I would mention it, since I think Trump can (and has) technically "nominated" some people already.

2563:

with the source (SES) on each column to make it clear (all columns of the table have been originated/updated from this source since I first included the table 4 years ago). I left your sfn_ls source at the head of the Date column (for SES-10 and SES-11) and your 'Early 2017' from sfn_ls for SES-11 instead of 'H1 2017' from SES as they could mean the same thing! Hope this makes sense to you...

3302: 1993: 1629: 1119: 975: 189:, yes this total should mean "Total delegates allocated so far", however the Wisconsin delegates were already in there (36 for Trump and 6 for Cruz). Not sure if we should add the uncommitted delegates in there, and from which source(s)... Anyway, back to fighting over-enthusiastic editors who keep changing numbers after a glance at their TV screen. — 3108:

particularly since he has had no other elected public office. So if I propose to move around sentences, even if nothing is removed, there will be pain and bloodshed. Proposing removal of trivia would be even worse. I would keep an open mind but am wary of constant fighting when some changes should be very easy to reach consensus among normal people.

394:(b) For the purposes of this rule and all other rules, "state" or "states" shall be taken to include American Samoa, the District of Columbia, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, except in Rule No. 14, and unless the context in which the word "state" or "states" is used clearly makes such inclusion inappropriate." 1209: 593: 1729:

next month or so (I'll see how that goes), so I don't know if I'll have the time to enact or properly oversee the move transition and template changes. Would you be willing to to implement the conditional logic to the year nav/dab templates? I'll be around some time I guess, and let me know if you wanted a second opinion on something —

3166:

situation where someone loses the presidency because of faithless electors. But it is not bluntly likely. In terms of a presidents electoral strength, it is only pledged electors that matters when we are comparing electoral margins. You should footnote off the number of faithless electors, not the other way around.

3558:

would in fact undermine NOTDEMOCRACY in my opinion. I did the tallies for that one RfC, but that was a one-time, ad hoc, special situation where I wanted to consider early close. That's quite a difference from tallies as matter of routine, and there would rightly be a ton of pushback on that. Anyway,

3165:

When it comes to the historicity of elections, the number of pledged electors is a lot more significant than actual electoral college votes cast. By footnoting off the actual number of pledged electors, you are condemning future generations to a lot of extra clicks. I realize there is a hypothetical

3023:

Thanks for your comment. However, there is no need to take the changes I made to the talk page. It is factually incorrect to put the Hong Kong flag in place as the column clearly is labelled 'country' not 'region' or 'country and/or region'. It would be incorrect to change the labelling of the column

2916:

Please stop spamming that link. In most cases, it's already listed in the article you're adding it to. Trump isn't president yet, so he hasn't nominated anyone for his cabinet and he can't until he takes office in January. The category is already listed, just hidden until the date it's actually true.

3663:

and was transparent about my action. This was obviously an editor inexperienced with the RfC process who listed their rationale and suggestion in a new section. Note that my move was not partisan and I would have done the same for a supporting voice. However you were entirely correct to revert me: I

3399:

that one day the practice will be common enough that many editors will look for that section first. To help that along, I think people should link to the consensuses thread that links to the consensus, also noting the item number, rather than link to the consensus directly. That not only evangelizes

3043:

The Donald Trump article will be an extremely hard article to bring up to average Knowledge standards, not to mention GA or FA. It will probably involve much fighting and many months. Either that or one group of people will wear out the other 2-3 groups. Compounding the problem is that Trump is very

2562:

Hi JFG. Saw you undid yesterday my edits to this, questioning my source. I had put the source at the start of the table to refer to the whole table (is there a better way to do this?) which you (presumably) took to mean the source was for the first column (Name) only. So, I have reinstated my edits

2516:

The landing burns can either be done with 1 engine or 3 engines. 1 engine burns are safer - especially on the ocean - because they allow impact speed to be picked with greater precision (which optimally should be 0 m/s). Imagine a rocket coming in for a landing while the drone ship is rocking on 15

2059:

Fresh air's nice; however, I doubt that all of our involvement with this requested move has slowed any of us up with our other tasks. I could be wrong. In any case, that particular discussion puts us on the verge of a resolution. And it all rests with whatever Newyorkbrad decides to do. If that

1843:

Extradition is state-level law, so if someone has been extradited to New York, they have been extradited to the state (even if they are physically moved to the city, extradition subjects them to the laws of the state). In case it comes up, by the way, all New York laws are state laws. The city only

1728:

you opened. I personally still don't believe in the moves actually, but it looks like they will proceed, and a potential closer will likely judge that as well. Most of the templates that should undergo changes are reasonably mentioned in the RfC afaik. I'm planning on being on semi-wikibreak in the

3482:

has already shown an interest in compilation of such data, so maybe they will be willing to crunch the numbers? The raw figures will give people at least some idea of the strength of an existing consensus, both in percentage terms (if consensus was 90/10 last time that is far stronger than 60/40)

3047:

I feel it is beyond my expertise to fight a talk page battle so I will leave it to more experienced hands like you (or 3 others that I wrote to). Below is a link to my sandbox, which shows an edited version that does 3 things. 1. It fixes the jumping back and forth of related areas that are placed

2974:

I wasn't sure how to highlight the whole row. Seems simple now that you have illustrated. In your immediately previous edit, you removed some names which are redlinked, but also some that are no longer visible in the live politico site. My copy was in an open browser tab, and said at the top of

2948:

As an aside, pedantically speaking I believe Trump can nominate now, and hearings/grillings of the nominees which need Senate confirmation will commence when the 115th Congress convenes (circa January 3rd if memory serves). In other words, some of them will probably be confirmed through committee

1795:

Hi JFG, yes I do mean it, still mostly per the technical concerns. I share similar feelings with some editors who think this is a solution in search of a problem. Though if the eventual closer closes the request as having consensus, that's okay by me. I'll help out if I can. Currently, I'm worried

937:

I can read it very well, thank you. The article only mentions the Пакет Яровой which bears Yarovaya's name, it doesn't say anything about her, and although it criticizes the contents of this legislative packet and the manner in which it was passed, it certainly doesn't support the libelous wording

3000:

Fair enough. I tend to err on the side of politico, rather than wikipedia, but I also think that most of those names were pretty speculative (about half of the ones that were removed were Indiana people -- presumably based on the assumption that Pence would get to make the SecAgr pick?). In any

2990:

Thanks for your remarks. The November 25th version of the Politico piece happened to add many unlikely names, practically none of them were notable enough to have a Knowledge article. I think the Politico editors wised up and removed those names in short order, so I don't see the point in quoting

2628:

elect of the United States and found it "jarring". They thought they were fixing it by changing the wording slightly. I agreed that we don't need to allow that break in the first paragraph of the article, and I fixed their fix by restoring the wording and adding the nowrap. We both considered the

1533:

page swaps for convenience, and thought you may want to try it out. You'd simply click "Swap" and enter a page destination, the script performs the 3 moves as necessary (saves time having to manually go through the move form 3 times). (It doesn't correct redirects afterwards, that's still manual)

166:

Hi, in reference to the delegate total—in the edit you undid I just added the 42 delegates from Wisconsin. I just had a look at the total again and did a sum over all the delegates that have been allocated so far, which now comes out as 1,689. The reason the column in the table doesn't sum to the

3507:

sufficient support that the sentence needs improving (just disagreement on how to do so), that it will probably come up again in six months, even if it does not get changed this month. And by leaving a placeholder for a future discussion six months hence, and allowing wikipedians who missed the

2520:

However, 1 engine burns use much more fuel than 3 engine burns. They use 1/3 the fuel per unit of time (of course. One engine lit compared to three), but they have to burn for much more than three times longer than a three engine burn due to extra gravity losses. 3 engine burns on the other hand

3088:

and conducting discussions and collaborative improvements there. Then whenever a section feels solid enough, place it in the real article and handle the reactions. Proceed similarly with each potentially contentious area, always treading lightly and respectfully with dissenters. I'd be happy to

2866:

Ok, that's a better rationale than your editsum. Thanks. I guess the two examples above are about equally ugly. My last big proposal is less than a month old and still an open RfC, so I'm not inclined to start another one at this point. If you do, let me know. I'm ok with your last edit for the

1765:

Thanks for the notice. I'm happy to see that consensus is forming there. We still have about a week until closing (30 days from 19 August). I'll be quite busy myself at that time, so assuming the move is approved, we should work with the closer and any other volunteers to apply the prerequisite

1476:, you'll see that the question does not appear there. It should not only appear there, but it should be the only thing that appears there. (You'll also see that a lot of other editors are doing it wrong, too.) If you fix the RfC, the listing pages will be automatically updated before long. ― 3107:

Thank you for your encouraging comments but it is discouraging to participate. There has been a lot of disagreement just to have the lead say whether he is an American businessman and politician who is the President-elect or leave out the word "politician" as being redundant to President,

3271:

for awhile. It appears that some folks there, have gone nuts over the fact that Sanders won an electoral vote for president. They're increasingly pushing to put him in the Infobox & are pushing to add confusion to the Results section via adding Sanders, Powell, Paul & Kasich

131:

Hmm....what's your source on that the Soyuz-U variant has been retired? According to sources at NASASpaceflight.com and Novosti Kosmonavtiki, there are at least 3 more Soyuz-U left to fly (for Progress MS-3/4/5). They even have the serial numbers of the rockets left to fly.....

2060:

editor decides to withdraw their singleton close, then we can perhaps decide on a new closing panel. And if the decision is not to withdraw, either explicitly or tacitly, then we will be compelled to open a move review. Either way, we will be brought nearer to true closure.

347:

as the continuation of that and far more notable than Falcon 9 Flight 22 because it actually worked and therefore is getting a lot more coverage in the news. It's a stub right now so it doesn't add much over the main article, but I think it's a good idea to keep the clearly

3710:, by naming the source of allegations. Also, placing the emphasis on "reports" better reflects the article contents, which talk mainly about the intelligence reports and various reactions to them, rather than the (alleged) hacks or other interference tactics themselves. — 3683:

Hi. Why did you choose to propose the move that didn't get any support in a previous discussion where you suggested it, instead of proposing a move ("Alleged..." or the similar "Allegations of...") that got support in the same previous discussion where you suggested it?

1285:

On MUOS-5 being salvageable, my money is rather on the army finding a creative way to use the bird in its present orbit, given the rather large ∂v requirements to move it to GSO if they can only rely on attitude-control thrusters. That would be similar to what happened to

3559:

nobody would be likely to sign up for that job when I move on, and really the only reason I'm still there is that no new current event has called my name. If features of the list go moribund after a while, that could threaten the continued existence of the list itself.

2622:

Say what? I've never seen that particular reasoning in 3.5 years. If it's admittedly useful, what difference does it make that people rarely bother to do it? That would seem to set an upper limit on excellence. What is the benefit of consistent mediocrity?

2045:

I archived this recent thread on purpose with the rest, feeling that we all need a bit of fresh air. Of course it's your prerogative to restore it, no harm done either way. Doesn't mean that I consider the case closed, I sure don't… Now see my edits to the

2636:

p.m. is also ugly), and I have never had a hint of objection to that (let alone the objection that we don't usually do that, therefore we shouldn't). At Donald Trump I chose to nowrap only the date(s) in the first paragraph, at least for the time being.

326:

Hi. Just wanted to let you know I reverted your change back to a redirect because I feel like having a dedicated article for launch and payload is important for these very significant launches. For the past three launches, much coverage (enough to meet

777:

I've missed the "Move subpages" button or redirect button once or twice but cleanup wasn't too bad. I somehow think they should make move subpages default to users who have it to keep everything together, you know what I mean? Anyway, no problem :)

1242:) is that only problems related to launch vehicles that caused the spacecraft to miss its target orbit or suffer from serious damage would be counted towards any kind of failures. Problems with the spacecraft itself would not count (see e.g. the 3044:

controversial. About 52% of people voting did not want him. Another 25% had negative feelings toward him even though they voted for him. That leaves maybe 20% that either support him a little or a lot, 80% don't like him or viciously hate him.

2585:

Yes, that's much clearer, thanks! Looks like SES-17 is not on the overview page though. I sometimes find much more detailed information on future launches in SES and Intelsat quarterly reports, perhaps this one can be sourced accordingly? —

2876:

method, despite its taking a little more space. It uses well-known template syntax instead of that weird ampersand-semicolon business, and I think the result is more readable in edit mode. Not a major issue for these two occurrences alone.

3348:

Thanks for the updates. My intent was "link 1" for the first or only link in each entry, followed by "link 2", etc, for additional links. This, following the precedent set by the "Current/recent consensuses" template box near the top of

2521:

minimize gravity losses, but allow so little margin for error when coming in for a landing that the stage often lands hard, damaging the legs or even weakening the structural integrity of the whole stage if the landing is too hard. —

1905:

Bots automatically expire pending RFCs after 30 days. In normal circumstances, anyone could close this one with an obvious-looking consensus, however given the sensitive nature of the discussions I have requested a formal close at

2085:

Personally I'd rather leave this episode to rest and get ready to craft a fresh move request taking into account events and new information since the non-closure of the previous one. But I'm watching your efforts with interest. —

3001:

case, I am happy to leave the removed names out for the present. I will try to dig up another source about Hamm being reticent to accept an administration job, however, since that seemed a pertinent factoid w.r.t likelihood.

3048:

apart (there's quite a bit of that). 2. Trims down some trivia. 3. The lead represents a better summary and also is the permitted 4 paragraphs. I did not edit the political and campaign sections yet and don't intend to.

836: 3381:

Sure; I didn't get your intent, so I just numbered the links with the list items, because it seemed odd to have 5 or 6 "link 1"s. That should be no big deal; hopefully this section helps reduce repeated requests, but

3611: 1598:

any attempt to fix it, so it's time for me to move on to an area of Knowledge that I can actually improve without getting reverted. Thanks for trying, and for preventing that filibuster from being too one-sided.

3252:

Seeing that the infobox contains final results (304/227), I have now added a footnote explaining the discrepancy with pledged electors, thereby fulfilling your prophecy. Hopefully this addresses your concerns. —

2848:

Regarding dates, I'd be happy to restore your change, however this would be better addressed as a global rendering issue. Mediawiki already detects spans of text representing dates, it could very easily render a

3571:

would also undermine, if not violate, NOTDEMOCRACY. The fact that I would prefer something has no connection to whether I can make a strong case for it, so it's pointless for me to state that I would prefer it.

1967:, which seems broadly in line with the language we worked out together a few days ago. If you find yourself getting push back on the article talk page, let me know and I will go to bat for you on this issue. -- 2475:, and absent any assertion that such criteria would justify the proposed long names for every Samoan locality, I had to deny the global move while leaving the door open for individual title changes. Finally, a 271:

again, I see all maps colored correctly. Anyway, that would be a question for the map's author, not me. Click on the map you want to get changed, look at the file details then contact the uploader. Cheers! —

2454:

the closer must weigh the arguments presented in light of policy, and avoid injecting their personal opinion (luckily I have none on this subject). Supporters essentially backed your proposal to apply the

1276:, you are correct, this is a similar case to Fobos-Grun. In fact I added a long comment to clarify that the rocket was not at fault, but the stats should remain untouched; I'll revert myself on the 167:

total is that there are uncommitted delegates, but I take it the "Total" there is supposed to be "total delegates allocated so far" rather than "total delegates pledged to a particular candidate". —

1473: 1280:

graph as well. Maybe we should place a note in the page explaining what is considered a failure or partial failure, in the same way as we had to explain sometimes what is and is not a spaceflight.

988:

Sure, but I am not done yet. Finding reliable sources that she is hated by her colleagues and called "slut" in the media will be tougher, but I hope still possible. Just can not do it full time.--

1907: 3057:

Consider commenting on the Donald Trump talk page about this sample revision. I do not plan on extensive discussion on the talk page and will leave it up to you. Let me know what you think.

2139:, it appeared to me that your signature had become detached from your subscription request and has been moving down the page; I have moved it back to where I assume it was supposed to be. 1418:

Common name or not, there was no consensus for the proposed change, and a new move request is already in progress with another potential title. I have no further comments on that case. —

1796:

that the closer says, "move the pages", and people start acting on them, breaking nav/dab links. I'm not enthusiastic about hatching out a technical plan until the RFC closes in favor —

922:

How do you know the article does not mention Yarovaya if you do not speak Russian? Are you searching for "Яровая"? You know, in Russian we have declinations. Try seraching for "Яров".--

331:) on the launch itself rather than the payload has come up, somewhat of a shift from the past. Because of that, articles started being made for launches as well as payloads such as 3199:

Sorry, I don't understand what you are accusing me of ("footnoting off the actual number of pledged electors"?). Care to point to a particular edit of mine you'd like to debate? —

1770:

helps. Perhaps before you leave you could suggest an exact sequence of steps to be taken, and I can review it? When that process is settled, I don't worry about implementation. —

1923:

Understood thank you ... you are 'way ahead of me. I was actually wondering about ANRFC but hadn't checked there to see whether it had already happened... should have done so.

3474:

I have also been watching this, and am not sure it will 'stick' well enough to make it a long-term practice, but there is always hope. At the risk of violating the spirit of

3565:

would be unjustifiable data redundancy. Any interested party can click the link and scroll to the bottom of the discussion (or the bottom of the close box, where one exists).

1356:

which is an essay explaining that Knowledge is not the place to advocate for what is right and wrong, but rather to neutrally report real-world usage. Kindest regards, —

2339:. Barring exceptional events, he will take office and the country will move on. For the record, I would defend the same position if Hillary Clinton had been elected. — 1617:

I understand your frustration. I just want to illuminate the issue from yet another angle, for the benefit of all readers. Please state your opinion in the RFC. Any

3516:, but might help people agree to work towards consensus in the meantime, or at minimum, solidify the reasons *why* opposition keeps cropping up. Too much work for 430:

Hi just wanted to notice I updated the map. The size of each pie chart is propotional to its state delegates. Although it took some time, but it is finally done!;)

1309:

Hello, I politely ask you to reconsider your decision to close the RfM, as consensus had formed towards moving the page. Furthermore, in your decision you cite

383: 268: 2991:

this outdated version now. The article as it stands has enough other sources to ensure that we probably aren't missing any serious candidate for the jobs. —

3610:

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a

2487:

is a guideline, so the former should carry more weight (but I didn't even consider this minor detail as relevant before being asked to justify my close). —

2459:

guideline to article titles for Samoan localities. Opponents argued that USPLACE shouldn't apply the same way to Samoa as it applies to US states, and that

700:

Thanks for the note. In the case of Article 50, I didn't perform a full 3-step swap and I skipped re-creating the Talk page when I made the new redirect of

3664:

should have contacted the user instead of copying their position myself, but I had forgotten that we had a way to open talk pages for IP users. I have now

2517:

foot waves. If the boat is swinging up toward the rocket, the rocket needs to rapidly adjust its speed so that it doesn't crash into the deck of the ship.

1238:

In the spaceflight by the years articles, the usual practice as far as I know (which is shared with all the websites dealing with such statistics, such as

561:

No problem, in the future though, please try to keep test and WIP edits in either your sandbox, or a draft. The graph looks really good though! Thank you,

1472:. The question should be the first part of the text, followed immediately by your first signature. If you click through to one of the listing pages, e.g. 2185:

Hi JFG. Just wondering how you managed to convert the year ranges with Thatcher. Did you use a script? (If you did, I'd like to know which.) Thank-you.--

3743:

Thanks for being patient with your access request. It should be processed relatively soon. Please let me know if you no longer think you need access. --

3268: 1217: 729: 725: 1446:. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. 1079:. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. 2853:

between every day and month, or before am/pm designations. Perhaps we could suggest this as a software improvement, and see if it gets consensus? —

711: 636:. I made these redirects from the old page to the new one for the sake of completeness to avoid breaking incoming talk page links to the old page. 2257: 367:

I respectfully disagree so I'll revert you a second time and invite you to take this discussion to the talk page. I'll list my arguments there. —

2547:

This explanation makes total sense, thanks for taking the time to message me. Have you found some sourcing other than Reddit in the meantime? —

2496:

Thanks for the explanation, I appreciate the detail. At some point I may try an RfC on one of the individual localities and see what happens.

1046: 151:

listed the future Progress MS-3/4/5 flights on Soyuz-2.1a like the first two; I didn't go back to check sources. Let me rephrase accordingly. —

1115:

Not sure what you are hinting at for me to resolve. I just posted a comprehensive answer to the move review. Let the chips fall where they may

2108: 2073: 2025: 1683: 1250: 1173:

and can (should) be done quickly. Didn't intend for the section to be a link/grace period discussion (which is more situation-specific). Per

2467:

were stronger criteria. Potential exceptions were mentioned for ambiguous names but there was no support for blanket renamings, despite the

2012:

A "live" discussion that was still ongoing has been returned to the New York talk page. Please be more careful when you manually archive.

1786:

In the Talk:1 RFC, I see that you recently stroke your "(for now)" but still have an "oppose" !vote bolded. Do you really mean to oppose? —

3525: 3350: 3002: 2976: 2950: 2825: 2741: 1166: 101: 2295:

Concerning Presidential & Vice President related articles. Please be patient & wait until Trump & Pence have taken office :)

3138:

I just happen to be extremely careful to use quotation marks whenever my text retains three or more words in the same order as a source.

2189: 1814: 1747: 1555: 1195: 1132:

I was hoping you might say that you stand by the consensus but regret applying to a ton of pages where the issue was not advertised.

796: 754: 707: 683: 2352:, though. At the very least, his name there should be hidden, until inauguration day. One wouldn't make such edits in the infobox at 1015:

It would be appropriate if this is properly reflected in reliable sources. Obviously I am not going to add this material unsourced.--

463:

Hello JFG. Thanks for edits to the list. All NAVSTAR satellites are designed with apogee propulsion system, except for GPS IIF. See

1321:), so I strongly recommend you ammend your comment. I'm going to wait one more day before starting a formal move review. Thank you. 1045:

Hi JFG, I've created a discussion for finding editors for the closing panel, at the Administrator's noticeboard. The discussion is

1678: 1650:

Because you have participated in a previous RFC on a closely related topic, I thought you might be interested in participating in

1177:, feel free to move that section to another page or let me know if you want me to do it (though I think you have more context). — 1401: 642:

recently pinged me about this issue about not breaking incoming talk page links, and I thought I'd share this with you as well.

3508:

formal RfC to retroactively 'add' their notvotes into a separate tally-column, it might even be plausible to achieve consensus

2513:

Hi, I noticed your edit comment on one of the Falcon articles about engine burns. All first stage reentry burns use 3 engines.

3143: 1469: 1262: 137: 2142:

If I have guessed wrong, please feel free to revert my change, and my apologies in advance for any misunderstanding. Best--

2595:

I've added a source for SES-17 (I'm sure it was mentioned in the original SES overview I cited but, as you say, not now!).

1766:

changes to templates. It looks like there will be a debate on the titling of year pages so that would buy us time as well.

1526: 944:(and that version was unsourced). Besides, this is just an opinion piece which probably wouldn't hold up to scrutiny as a 403: 3315:

Eventually, there'll need to be a split of the Results section into sub-sections of popular votes & electoral votes.

2831: 2745: 81: 3224: 3181: 2421: 1393: 609: 91: 3353:. I don't see what uniqueness buys us there, and it's another detail that one has to attend to. Cost-benefit ratio? ― 2412: 1521: 1291: 86: 76: 71: 66: 61: 3139: 2098: 2063: 2015: 1659: 1273: 1258: 811: 601: 505: 133: 96: 552:

noted, this was a temporary page to work on a new graph; this work is done now, feel free to delete the page. —

112: 3529: 3006: 2980: 2954: 2472: 1687: 399: 3653: 3085: 487: 3404:

agreement that the consensus is in fact a consensus (especially valuable in cases without a formal close). ―

2417: 1277: 1170: 388: 3395:

The section is new, so it's quite possible nobody supporting a change in that thread was aware it existed.

768:! Strange... the move tool should have taken care of all the talk subpages. I'll triple-check next time. — 3665: 3475: 3029: 2192: 1807: 1740: 1708: 1548: 1348:

which is indeed policy, and has higher standing than the supporters' arguments in this case. I also cited

1251:

http://spaceflightnow.com/2016/08/02/navy-looks-for-plan-b-to-salvage-its-newest-communications-satellite/

1188: 789: 747: 733: 676: 605: 549: 3614:

ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~

2922: 2468: 1911: 1767: 1443: 1439: 1432: 1072: 3150:

Understood. I just looked up his bio which verifies the fact, so I think the quotes are unnecessary. —

1336:

I stand by my detailed close statement. I understand your position but my decision accurately reflects

282:

Sorry lol apparently i don't know my states I was looking at KY. The dems haven't had the primary yet

3737: 3724: 3689: 3513: 3212: 3169: 3113: 3065: 2634:

20, 2017. In several shorter articles I have nowrapped every date, as well as every time-of-day (4:00

2476: 2464: 2105: 2070: 2040: 2022: 1699: 1674: 1655: 1397: 1341: 1146:

For the record (mostly towards my own potentially lapsing memory), the move decision was endorsed. —

1054: 902: 868: 859: 2939:

Sorry, I didn't see the hidden category because I was adding it with the HotCat tool. No worries. —

1365:

Thank you for your comment. As I consider your decision specious, I'll proceed with the move review.

1249:

Besides, I don't see anything that shows the problem to be non-salvageable at this moment (see e.g.

3748: 2179: 2147: 1254: 1020: 993: 962: 927: 880: 844: 566: 531: 523: 308: 283: 253: 237: 220: 198:

Hmm, I was sure it had been the same before Wisconsin, that's why I updated. Thanks for checking. —

148: 2652: 2596: 2580: 2564: 1093:

I know it's late. If there's any way you can resolve this, I'd be happy to back out the review.

3582: 3414: 3363: 2887: 2647: 2527: 2226: 2136: 2129: 1972: 1486: 1349: 1137: 1098: 1084: 884: 483: 392:"THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE RULE NO. 1: Organization of the Republican National Committee 344: 340: 336: 332: 312: 287: 257: 224: 117: 3247: 3216: 3194: 3173: 3053:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Usernamen1/sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=754347721

2095:

Thank you, and I like the FAQ page, especially the handy history links for this ongoing saga!

3707: 3442: 3383: 3320: 3281: 3025: 2600: 2568: 2484: 2460: 2456: 2390: 2361: 2318: 2300: 2203: 2186: 2047: 1946: 1928: 1895: 1890:

but I don't see any closure... you srer more experienced in RfCs I gather, what happens next?

1797: 1781: 1760: 1730: 1704: 1538: 1451: 1409: 1370: 1326: 1178: 807: 779: 765: 737: 714:(s) I'm not sure why the talk page wasn't swapped properly; good on you catching the error! — 695: 666: 357: 3478:

my suggestion would be that adding nose-counting tallies might be helpful, when they exist.

2934: 2918: 2768: 2683: 2497: 2441: 2236: 1854: 1622: 1604: 1318: 511:

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can

114: 41: 3720: 3701: 3685: 3220: 3177: 3109: 3076: 3061: 2336: 2268: 1174: 1050: 897: 863: 1352:

which is a guideline against giving undue weight to the official standing of a name, and

3744: 3639: 3396: 3209:

Did you not change Trump's electoral votes from 306 to 304? And Clinton's similarly?

2451: 2159: 2143: 1530: 1076: 1065: 1016: 989: 958: 923: 916: 840: 662: 562: 543: 527: 431: 3660: 3650: 3643: 3615: 3573: 3479: 3405: 3376: 3354: 2878: 2659: 2638: 2542: 2522: 1984: 1968: 1618: 1595: 1591: 1499: 1477: 1353: 1337: 1133: 1110: 1094: 1080: 1003: 948:. Please find better sources and stick to facts if you wish to expand the article. — 328: 17: 2168:

made a typo when approving me. And that reminds me of completing my registration… —

464: 3521: 3316: 3293: 3277: 2480: 2386: 2357: 2353: 2330: 2314: 2296: 2165: 1942: 1924: 1891: 1447: 1405: 1366: 1345: 1322: 945: 835:

I love your changes to the 2016 in spaceflight article! I suggest you also update

468: 353: 200: 184: 169: 2335:

It's not a question of being impatient; it's a question of reporting facts. DT is

1872:

Thanks, good to know if such cases come up again. Which article was this about? —

1167:

Talk:New York/July 2016 move request#Post-discussion potential move considerations

116: 3752: 3728: 3714: 3693: 3672: 3625: 3587: 3533: 3449: 3428: 3419: 3390: 3368: 3333: 3324: 3310: 3285: 3257: 3239: 3228: 3203: 3185: 3154: 3117: 3098: 3069: 3033: 3010: 2995: 2984: 2958: 2943: 2926: 2901: 2892: 2857: 2604: 2590: 2572: 2551: 2534: 2500: 2491: 2444: 2437: 2425: 2394: 2380: 2365: 2343: 2322: 2304: 2289: 2272: 2250: 2240: 2232: 2212: 2195: 2172: 2151: 2114: 2090: 2079: 2054: 2031: 2001: 1976: 1950: 1932: 1918: 1899: 1876: 1867: 1859: 1845: 1828: 1819: 1790: 1774: 1752: 1712: 1691: 1663: 1637: 1608: 1600: 1570: 1560: 1508: 1491: 1455: 1422: 1413: 1383: 1374: 1360: 1330: 1298: 1266: 1243: 1224: 1200: 1150: 1141: 1127: 1102: 1088: 1058: 1024: 1010: 997: 983: 966: 952: 931: 907: 891: 873: 848: 818: 801: 772: 759: 718: 688: 613: 579: 570: 556: 535: 491: 452: 442: 417: 407: 371: 361: 349: 316: 301: 291: 276: 261: 246: 228: 206: 193: 175: 155: 141: 1625:

issues should be dealt with separately. Don't let anyone stonewall your voice!

1171:

editnotices, archiving, template-namespace links, etc. would be uncontroversial

3489: 2280: 2264: 1400:

goes against your decision, so your rationale doesn't hold, see my comment at

508:

for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

472: 3060:

Disclaimer: I am a foreigner and not a registered Republican or Democrat.

1679:

Talk:List of Special Economic Zones in India#Requested move 28 August 2016

624:

Hi JFG, this is about a round-robin move you performed recently. FYI, see

3711: 3669: 3647: 3446: 3425: 3387: 3330: 3307: 3254: 3236: 3200: 3151: 3095: 2992: 2940: 2898: 2854: 2587: 2548: 2488: 2377: 2340: 2286: 2247: 2209: 2169: 2087: 2051: 1998: 1915: 1873: 1825: 1787: 1771: 1634: 1567: 1505: 1419: 1380: 1357: 1295: 1221: 1147: 1124: 1007: 980: 949: 888: 815: 769: 715: 576: 553: 478: 449: 414: 389:

https://prod-static-ngop-pbl.s3.amazonaws.com/docs/2012_RULES_Adopted.pdf

368: 298: 273: 243: 190: 152: 3276:, even though those votes don't correlate with their electoral votes :( 2219:

International reactions to the United States presidential election, 2016

971:

Quite the opposite, thanks for improving the wording and the sourcing!

837:

Knowledge:WikiProject Spaceflight/Timeline of spaceflight working group

2231:, but please discuss your (rightfully) bold changes on talk. Thanks ;) 812:

Knowledge talk:Page mover#Moving subpages should be the default action

475:) have decayed, while Centaur/DCCS still stay on the graveyard orbit. 1725: 1404:. I'm inclined to open another review on that close. Please comment. 1287: 1232: 649:

had a talk page, 3 archives, and a good article nomination, swapping

382:

Thanks for the correction and your work on the important WP article:

352:

subject on its own article so that it can be expanded in the future.

3084:

From a practical standpoint, I would recommend moving your draft to

1651: 1470:

Knowledge:Requests for comment#Statement should be neutral and brief

1537:

Anyway feel free to adapt this script as you see fit, cheers :) —

1504:

Thanks for the note. I have amended the RFC listing accordingly. —

3494:

opt#3or4 (~25% ~7+5) 'relatively many false per fact-checkers' or

957:

Ok. You will probably not like it in the end, but I do not care.--

426:

File:U.S. States by Vote Distribution, 2016 (Republican Party).svg

1910:. It may yet take a few days or weeks until an admin volunteers. 1519:

Hi JFG, hope everything's going well. Thought I'd share a script

1887:

I see that a bot has removed the RfC notice concerning PT of NY

519:, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. 242:

I don't see such a problem. which page are you talking about? —

1239: 724:

Hi JFG, looks like you forgot to round-robin the subpages. See

1402:

Talk:Queen_Margarita_of_Bulgaria#Requested_move_16_August_2016

638: 252:

On the Dem map NC should already be colored gold for Hillary

147:

Sorry, seems I was a bit quick in my eulogy for Soyuz-U :) --

118: 35: 2471:

argument. Article titles are ultimately governed by the five

1474:

Knowledge:Requests for comment/Maths, science, and technology

3524:

is an exception which will justify the bookkeeping effort.

2666: 2376:

to clarify the situation. Hope this meets your agreement. —

2356:, because one would be reverted by many. Again, be patient. 1582:

Is New York State the primary topic for the term "New York"?

2413:

Talk:Fossil fuel phase-out#Requested move 17 November 2016

1989:

Will keep watching this. Thanks for the emotional relief!

1908:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure

732:. Also, make sure you also update the bot archiving, e.g. 497:

Speedy deletion nomination of Timeline of spaceflight/WIP

3441:

Off-topic for a personal talk page; please take this to

575:

You're right, I should have used the Draft namespace. —

471:. All PAM-D upper stages (for IIR and IIRM series, e.g. 3638:

was entirely inappropriate, so I have reverted it. See

3635: 3135: 3052: 2972: 2618: 2613:

Removing useful things because we don't usually do them

2372: 2140: 1964: 1938: 1888: 1466: 940: 702: 632: 626: 514: 1392:

Hello again. I didn't really follow the discussion on

2897:

Glad that we could resolve this amicably. Cheers! —

1700:

Talk:Free trade area#Requested move 3 September 2016

1340:(which, as nominator, it is not your job to judge). 2771: 2686: 413:You're welcome. I learn something new every day. — 219:Why isn't NC colored gold? Hillary won that state 2313:, PLEASE. There's not need to rush things along. 1675:Talk:Free trade zone#Requested move 28 August 2016 1396:. However in that case it seems pretty clear that 3496:opt#6 (~10% ~2+3) 'many characterized as false', 3161:Distinguish pledged electors from actual EC votes 2050:for some humorous assessment of the 2016 saga. — 941:inserted into the article earlier by an IP editor 465:http://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/navstar-2f.htm 3510:just by keeping the table of nose-counts updated 2824:is an American businessman, politician, and the 2739:is an American businessman, politician, and the 896:OK, thanks, but it wasn't fixed when I posted.-- 665:for the details. Hope this only helps! Thanks — 469:http://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/navstar-3.htm 1724:Hi JFG, there appears to be rough consensus at 657:without the talk/subpages will turn the former 2783: 2698: 1002:I don't think that would be appropriate for a 3486: 2760: 2675: 384:Republican_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016 269:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016 8: 3400:the consensuses thread, but it also shows a 3089:participate in your effort, time permitting. 2971:Thanks for fixing the background-coloration, 2263:See my comment on that article's talk page. 839:to document the new sections and formats. -- 627:Talk:Women's Laser Radial World Championship 504:I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 3630: 3329:Eventually, nobody will care any longer… — 3024:because all other flags are for countries. 1049:, so this is just courtesy notice. Thanks, 3512:. Recording the numeric outcome would be 3456:The following discussion has been closed. 3437: 3210: 3167: 2794: 2791: 2777: 2709: 2706: 2692: 2436:Hi JFG. Regarding your recent closure at 473:http://www.n2yo.com/browse/?y=2000&m=7 3269:United States presidential election, 2016 2808: 2723: 1218:Talk:New York/July 2016 move consequences 887:? :Sure, I fixed the spelling for him. — 730:Special:PrefixIndex/Talk:Syrian civil war 726:Special:PrefixIndex/Talk:Syrian Civil War 3631:Please don't proxy vote for another user 3606:Extended confirmed protection policy RfC 2632:The following is downright ugly: January 386:. You are entirely correct as I read: 3706:I felt that the proposed title is more 2258:List of Presidents of the United States 2128:I repaired (I hope!) your signature at 1941:. Better than weeks or months. (:-: --> 1253:), so I'm not sure your wording in the 712:Women's Laser Radial World Championship 3503:Which to me at least, indicates there 2285:Thanks, I answered at length there. — 1963:I just wanted to offer my support for 1824:Understood. Let's see what happens. — 162:Delegate total on Republican primaries 2869:I'll say that I prefer nowrap to the 2797: 2780: 2712: 2695: 7: 3498:opt#2or0 (~20% ~8+1) remove 'false'. 3351:Talk:2016 Orlando nightclub shooting 3299: 2814: 2805: 2802: 2786: 2774: 2742:President-elect of the United States 2729: 2720: 2717: 2701: 2689: 2558:SES S.A. - Future satellite launches 2208:No, I went through them manually. — 1990: 1626: 1116: 972: 2811: 2726: 1305:Closed RfM on Queen Anne of Romania 1566:Thanks, I'll be sure to try it! — 708:Withdrawal from the European Union 24: 3267:Howdy. I'm walking away from the 1677:. For your information, see also 410:-- We live in interesting times. 297:Hah! Back to school I guess ;) — 3300: 2767: 2682: 2407:Compound adjective (hyphenation) 1991: 1627: 1207: 1169:. My intent was to mention that 1117: 973: 591: 40: 3019:Tallest buildings and Hong Kong 2612: 1515:pageswap script for convenience 831:Timeline of spaceflight changes 307:Ha thanks for your diligence! 1951:20:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC) 1933:20:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC) 1919:11:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC) 1900:11:19, 28 September 2016 (UTC) 1877:21:06, 27 September 2016 (UTC) 1860:16:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC) 1829:05:13, 19 September 2016 (UTC) 1820:17:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC) 1791:17:16, 18 September 2016 (UTC) 1775:17:18, 13 September 2016 (UTC) 1753:16:31, 13 September 2016 (UTC) 1: 3753:16:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 3729:21:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 3715:18:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 3694:17:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 3673:01:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC) 3654:00:38, 24 December 2016 (UTC) 3626:16:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC) 3588:19:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC) 3534:18:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC) 3450:23:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC) 3429:07:43, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 3420:06:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 3391:06:27, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 3369:04:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 3334:00:41, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 3325:00:39, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 3311:00:33, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 3286:00:08, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 3258:07:51, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 3240:19:59, 20 December 2016 (UTC) 3229:19:20, 20 December 2016 (UTC) 3204:17:41, 20 December 2016 (UTC) 3186:17:36, 20 December 2016 (UTC) 3155:06:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC) 3118:07:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC) 3099:05:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC) 3070:05:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC) 2912:Trump administration category 2626:Another editor saw President- 2552:10:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC) 2535:03:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC) 2501:19:22, 20 November 2016 (UTC) 2492:21:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC) 2445:19:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC) 2426:08:12, 18 November 2016 (UTC) 2395:09:02, 16 November 2016 (UTC) 2381:09:01, 16 November 2016 (UTC) 2366:08:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC) 2344:08:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC) 2323:08:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC) 2305:08:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC) 2290:06:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC) 2273:05:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC) 2251:01:43, 12 November 2016 (UTC) 2241:01:39, 12 November 2016 (UTC) 1713:12:23, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 1692:11:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC) 1161:Feel free to move the section 860:User_talk:Vkumar1216#spelling 3034:12:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC) 3011:10:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC) 2996:22:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC) 2985:22:06, 7 December 2016 (UTC) 2959:22:06, 7 December 2016 (UTC) 2944:15:01, 6 December 2016 (UTC) 2927:14:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC) 2902:22:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC) 2893:19:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC) 2858:11:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC) 2653:04:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC) 2605:18:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC) 2591:12:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC) 2573:08:21, 1 December 2016 (UTC) 2213:14:01, 31 October 2016 (UTC) 2196:08:30, 31 October 2016 (UTC) 2173:19:20, 27 October 2016 (UTC) 2152:17:05, 27 October 2016 (UTC) 2115:08:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC) 2091:07:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC) 2080:07:06, 26 October 2016 (UTC) 2055:05:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC) 2032:05:42, 26 October 2016 (UTC) 2002:15:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC) 1977:15:06, 24 October 2016 (UTC) 1240:http://planet4589.org/space/ 661:'s pages into redlinks. See 378:Republican 2016 Primary Race 2348:He' not the U.S. President 2164:Oh yes, thanks! Looks like 1673:Thanks for your comment on 1664:17:54, 31 August 2016 (UTC) 1638:16:49, 28 August 2016 (UTC) 1609:12:03, 28 August 2016 (UTC) 1571:06:02, 25 August 2016 (UTC) 1561:02:29, 25 August 2016 (UTC) 1509:10:19, 19 August 2016 (UTC) 1492:09:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC) 1456:09:13, 16 August 2016 (UTC) 1423:13:43, 18 August 2016 (UTC) 1414:08:56, 17 August 2016 (UTC) 1394:Queen Margarita of Bulgaria 1384:09:05, 16 August 2016 (UTC) 1375:09:04, 16 August 2016 (UTC) 1361:08:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC) 1331:08:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC) 1151:09:27, 16 August 2016 (UTC) 602:Timeline of spaceflight/WIP 506:Timeline of spaceflight/WIP 3768: 3738:Knowledge:World_Bank#Apply 2828:elect of the United States 2411:For your information, see 1646:Notification about new RFC 1438:An editor has asked for a 1299:21:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC) 1267:14:09, 9 August 2016 (UTC) 1071:An editor has asked for a 443:03:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC) 418:05:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC) 408:04:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC) 2246:Yep, let's talk there. — 2223:It got over-ridden in an 1225:17:51, 28 July 2016 (UTC) 1201:14:38, 28 July 2016 (UTC) 1165:Hi JFG, saw your note at 1142:23:20, 28 July 2016 (UTC) 1128:15:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC) 1103:01:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC) 1089:01:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC) 1059:23:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC) 1041:Request for closing panel 849:16:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC) 810:I just suggested this on 736:. I'll get to this now — 719:05:27, 29 June 2016 (UTC) 689:19:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC) 372:09:41, 9 April 2016 (UTC) 362:07:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC) 317:02:18, 9 April 2016 (UTC) 302:00:13, 9 April 2016 (UTC) 292:00:08, 9 April 2016 (UTC) 277:16:53, 8 April 2016 (UTC) 262:14:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC) 247:05:16, 8 April 2016 (UTC) 229:04:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC) 207:22:06, 7 April 2016 (UTC) 194:22:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC) 176:17:37, 7 April 2016 (UTC) 156:11:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC) 142:10:22, 2 April 2016 (UTC) 38: 3520:articles, but I suspect 3459:Please do not modify it. 3298:Aren't US politics fun? 2967:morphing politico source 1025:08:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC) 1011:08:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC) 998:07:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC) 984:07:54, 7 July 2016 (UTC) 967:07:17, 7 July 2016 (UTC) 953:07:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC) 932:05:49, 7 July 2016 (UTC) 908:10:06, 7 July 2016 (UTC) 892:05:27, 7 July 2016 (UTC) 874:00:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC) 819:09:35, 6 July 2016 (UTC) 802:18:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC) 773:18:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC) 760:17:42, 4 July 2016 (UTC) 614:21:39, 24 May 2016 (UTC) 580:19:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC) 571:19:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC) 557:18:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC) 536:23:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 522:You can leave a note on 3086:Draft:Donald Trump 2017 1654:regarding Donald Trump. 1313:while claiming to cite 1278:timeline of spaceflight 526:if you have questions. 492:15:01, 6 May 2016 (UTC) 453:14:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC) 215:(on some election page) 3500: 3344:Trump consensuses list 2838: 2822:; born June 14, 1946) 2752: 2737:; born June 14, 1946) 1529:) that semi-automates 1257:article is warranted. 734:Special:Diff/728327326 653:and its subpages with 3488:option#1 (~45% ~19) ' 3263:2016 US prez article. 2830:. He is scheduled to 2750:on January 20, 2017. 2744:. He is scheduled to 1444:Queen Anne of Romania 1433:Queen Anne of Romania 645:For example, if page 515:contest this deletion 448:Beautiful, thanks! — 3140:TheTimesAreAChanging 2509:Falcon reentry burns 1338:Wikipedian consensus 1274:Galactic Penguin SST 1259:Galactic Penguin SST 134:Galactic Penguin SST 1939:we have a volunteer 1255:2016 in spaceflight 881:Calcutta High Court 600:I now have deleted 400:Charles Edwin Shipp 149:2016 in spaceflight 3659:I'm well aware of 3445:if you need to. — 3051:Here is the link. 2836:January 20, 2017. 885:Kolkata High Court 440: 345:Falcon 9 Flight 23 341:Falcon 9 Flight 22 337:Falcon 9 Flight 21 333:Falcon 9 Flight 20 322:redirect v article 3623: 3603: 3602: 3443:Talk:Donald Trump 3231: 3215:comment added by 3188: 3172:comment added by 2844: 2843: 2763:Donald John Trump 2678:Donald John Trump 2532: 2473:WP:NAMINGCRITERIA 2418:Kalimera Pouliths 2230: 2117: 2111: 2082: 2076: 2048:Talk:New York/FAQ 2034: 2028: 2008:When archiving... 1590:, but the page's 710:. In the case of 606:Anthony Appleyard 550:Anthony Appleyard 432: 124: 123: 3759: 3705: 3619: 3585: 3580: 3461: 3438: 3417: 3412: 3384:I have my doubts 3380: 3366: 3361: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3297: 3251: 3198: 3094:Kind regards, — 3039:Trump difficulty 2938: 2890: 2885: 2852: 2821: 2820: 2817: 2816: 2813: 2810: 2807: 2804: 2800: 2799: 2796: 2793: 2789: 2788: 2785: 2782: 2779: 2776: 2773: 2736: 2735: 2732: 2731: 2728: 2725: 2722: 2719: 2715: 2714: 2711: 2708: 2704: 2703: 2700: 2697: 2694: 2691: 2688: 2667: 2650: 2645: 2629:issue resolved. 2584: 2546: 2530: 2526: 2483:is policy while 2479:may assert that 2375: 2373:added a footnote 2334: 2311:January 20, 2017 2284: 2224: 2207: 2163: 2113: 2109: 2101: 2078: 2074: 2066: 2044: 2030: 2026: 2018: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1988: 1871: 1852: 1844:has ordinances. 1818: 1810: 1785: 1764: 1751: 1743: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1559: 1551: 1503: 1489: 1484: 1431:Move review for 1215: 1211: 1210: 1199: 1191: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1114: 1064:Move review for 978: 977: 976: 943: 905: 900: 871: 866: 800: 792: 758: 750: 705: 699: 687: 679: 641: 635: 629: 599: 595: 594: 547: 518: 482: 439: 438: 241: 203: 188: 172: 127:Soyuz-U retired? 119: 44: 36: 3767: 3766: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3741: 3699: 3681: 3666:taken that path 3633: 3622: 3608: 3583: 3574: 3514:a bit difficult 3490:many were false 3476:WP:NOTDEMOCRACY 3457: 3415: 3406: 3374: 3364: 3355: 3346: 3301: 3291: 3265: 3245: 3192: 3163: 3132: 3041: 3021: 2969: 2932: 2914: 2888: 2879: 2850: 2845: 2801: 2790: 2770: 2766: 2716: 2705: 2685: 2681: 2648: 2639: 2615: 2578: 2560: 2540: 2533: 2528: 2511: 2434: 2409: 2371: 2337:President-elect 2328: 2278: 2261: 2221: 2201: 2183: 2157: 2133: 2099: 2064: 2041:Paine Ellsworth 2038: 2016: 2010: 1992: 1982: 1961: 1885: 1865: 1846: 1841: 1808: 1804: 1779: 1758: 1741: 1737: 1722: 1684:128.179.146.139 1671: 1656:Anythingyouwant 1648: 1628: 1579: 1549: 1545: 1517: 1497: 1487: 1478: 1463: 1436: 1307: 1292:Galileo FOC 1+2 1236: 1208: 1206: 1189: 1185: 1163: 1118: 1108: 1069: 1043: 974: 946:reliable source 939: 920: 903: 898: 869: 864: 856: 833: 790: 786: 748: 744: 701: 693: 677: 673: 637: 633:Talk:Article 50 631: 625: 622: 592: 590: 541: 512: 499: 476: 461: 434: 433: 428: 380: 324: 267:Just looked at 235: 217: 201: 182: 170: 164: 129: 120: 115: 106: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3765: 3763: 3740: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3732: 3731: 3680: 3677: 3676: 3675: 3632: 3629: 3620: 3607: 3604: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3569:Notches/sticks 3566: 3560: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3526:47.222.203.135 3501: 3497: 3495: 3493: 3484: 3463: 3462: 3453: 3452: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3397:I Have a Dream 3345: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3274:write-in-votes 3264: 3261: 3243: 3242: 3207: 3206: 3162: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3131: 3130:"Scare quotes" 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3091: 3090: 3081: 3080: 3040: 3037: 3020: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3003:47.222.203.135 2977:47.222.203.135 2968: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2951:47.222.203.135 2913: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2868: 2861: 2860: 2842: 2841: 2835: 2827: 2823: 2759: 2758: 2753: 2747: 2740: 2738: 2674: 2673: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2635: 2633: 2627: 2614: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2559: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2525: 2510: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2469:WP:CONSISTENCY 2433: 2430: 2416: 2408: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2293: 2292: 2260: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2220: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2182: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2132: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2009: 2006: 2005: 2004: 1960: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1935: 1912:WP:No deadline 1884: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1840: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1777: 1768:WP:No deadline 1721: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1703: 1682: 1670: 1667: 1647: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1623:WP:BATTLEfield 1612: 1611: 1578: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1516: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1462: 1459: 1435: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1306: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1282: 1281: 1235: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1162: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1077:2016 NFL Draft 1068: 1066:2016 NFL Draft 1062: 1042: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 919: 917:Irina Yarovaya 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 855: 852: 832: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 621: 618: 617: 616: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 498: 495: 460: 457: 456: 455: 427: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 398:Thanks Again, 393: 391: 387: 379: 376: 375: 374: 323: 320: 305: 304: 280: 279: 250: 249: 216: 213: 212: 211: 210: 209: 163: 160: 159: 158: 128: 125: 122: 121: 113: 111: 108: 107: 105: 104: 99: 94: 89: 84: 79: 74: 69: 64: 59: 53: 50: 49: 46: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3764: 3755: 3754: 3750: 3746: 3739: 3736: 3730: 3726: 3722: 3718: 3717: 3716: 3713: 3709: 3703: 3698: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3679:Proposed move 3678: 3674: 3671: 3667: 3662: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3652: 3649: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3628: 3627: 3624: 3618: 3613: 3605: 3589: 3586: 3581: 3579: 3578: 3570: 3564: 3557: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3519: 3515: 3511: 3506: 3502: 3499: 3491: 3485: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3460: 3455: 3454: 3451: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3439: 3430: 3427: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3418: 3413: 3411: 3410: 3403: 3398: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3389: 3385: 3378: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3367: 3362: 3360: 3359: 3352: 3343: 3335: 3332: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3309: 3295: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3270: 3262: 3260: 3259: 3256: 3249: 3241: 3238: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3214: 3205: 3202: 3196: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3175: 3171: 3160: 3156: 3153: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3129: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3097: 3093: 3092: 3087: 3083: 3082: 3078: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3058: 3055: 3054: 3049: 3045: 3038: 3036: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3018: 3012: 3008: 3004: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2994: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2973: 2966: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2942: 2936: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2911: 2903: 2900: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2891: 2886: 2884: 2883: 2875: 2872: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2859: 2856: 2847: 2846: 2840: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2819: 2764: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2751: 2749: 2743: 2734: 2679: 2672:Your proposal 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2661: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2651: 2646: 2644: 2643: 2630: 2624: 2620: 2619: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2589: 2582: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2557: 2553: 2550: 2544: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2531: 2524: 2518: 2514: 2508: 2502: 2499: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2477:WP:WIKILAWYER 2474: 2470: 2466: 2465:WP:COMMONNAME 2462: 2458: 2453: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2443: 2439: 2431: 2429: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2414: 2406: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2379: 2374: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2342: 2338: 2332: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2307: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2291: 2288: 2282: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2259: 2256: 2252: 2249: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2228: 2227:edit conflict 2218: 2214: 2211: 2205: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2194: 2191: 2188: 2181: 2178: 2174: 2171: 2167: 2161: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2138: 2131: 2127: 2116: 2112: 2106: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2089: 2084: 2083: 2081: 2077: 2071: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2053: 2049: 2042: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2033: 2029: 2023: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2007: 2003: 2000: 1986: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1958: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1882: 1878: 1875: 1869: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1858: 1857: 1853: 1851: 1850: 1838: 1830: 1827: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1816: 1813: 1811: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1789: 1783: 1778: 1776: 1773: 1769: 1762: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1749: 1746: 1744: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1727: 1719: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1701: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1680: 1676: 1668: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1645: 1639: 1636: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1576: 1572: 1569: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1557: 1554: 1552: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1535: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1523: 1514: 1510: 1507: 1501: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1490: 1485: 1483: 1482: 1475: 1471: 1468:, please see 1467: 1461:RfC structure 1460: 1458: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1434: 1430: 1424: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1398:WP:COMMONNAME 1395: 1391: 1385: 1382: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1342:WP:COMMONNAME 1339: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1304: 1300: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1284: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1247: 1245: 1241: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1223: 1219: 1214: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1197: 1194: 1192: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1160: 1152: 1149: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1126: 1112: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1091: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1067: 1063: 1061: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1040: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1009: 1005: 1001: 1000: 999: 995: 991: 987: 986: 985: 982: 970: 969: 968: 964: 960: 956: 955: 954: 951: 947: 942: 936: 935: 934: 933: 929: 925: 918: 915: 909: 906: 901: 895: 894: 893: 890: 886: 882: 878: 877: 876: 875: 872: 867: 861: 853: 851: 850: 846: 842: 838: 830: 820: 817: 813: 809: 805: 804: 803: 798: 795: 793: 785: 784: 783: 776: 775: 774: 771: 767: 764:Thanks a lot 763: 762: 761: 756: 753: 751: 743: 742: 741: 735: 731: 727: 723: 722: 721: 720: 717: 713: 709: 704: 697: 691: 690: 685: 682: 680: 672: 671: 670: 664: 660: 656: 652: 648: 643: 640: 634: 628: 619: 615: 611: 607: 603: 598: 589: 588: 581: 578: 574: 573: 572: 568: 564: 560: 559: 558: 555: 551: 545: 540: 539: 538: 537: 533: 529: 525: 520: 517: 516: 509: 507: 502: 496: 494: 493: 489: 485: 480: 474: 470: 466: 458: 454: 451: 447: 446: 445: 444: 441: 437: 425: 419: 416: 412: 411: 409: 405: 401: 397: 396: 395: 390: 385: 377: 373: 370: 366: 365: 364: 363: 359: 355: 351: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 321: 319: 318: 314: 310: 303: 300: 296: 295: 294: 293: 289: 285: 278: 275: 270: 266: 265: 264: 263: 259: 255: 248: 245: 239: 233: 232: 231: 230: 226: 222: 214: 208: 205: 204: 197: 196: 195: 192: 186: 180: 179: 178: 177: 174: 173: 161: 157: 154: 150: 146: 145: 144: 143: 139: 135: 126: 110: 109: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 63: 60: 58: 55: 54: 52: 51: 47: 45: 43: 37: 34: 32: 30: 28: 26: 19: 18:User talk:JFG 3742: 3682: 3634: 3616: 3609: 3576: 3575: 3568: 3562: 3555: 3522:Donald Trump 3517: 3509: 3504: 3487: 3458: 3408: 3407: 3401: 3357: 3356: 3347: 3273: 3266: 3244: 3235:I didn't. — 3211:— Preceding 3208: 3168:— Preceding 3164: 3133: 3059: 3056: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3026:Robynthehode 3022: 2970: 2915: 2881: 2880: 2873: 2870: 2839: 2762: 2761: 2677: 2676: 2641: 2640: 2631: 2625: 2621: 2616: 2561: 2519: 2515: 2512: 2435: 2410: 2354:Donald Trump 2349: 2310: 2308: 2294: 2262: 2222: 2204:Neve-selbert 2184: 2180:WP:DATERANGE 2134: 2097: 2096: 2062: 2061: 2014: 2013: 2011: 1962: 1886: 1855: 1848: 1847: 1842: 1839:Helpful hint 1806: 1799: 1798: 1782:Andy M. Wang 1761:Andy M. Wang 1739: 1732: 1731: 1723: 1705:Juliet Jolly 1672: 1652:this new RFC 1649: 1619:WP:OWNership 1587: 1581: 1580: 1547: 1540: 1539: 1536: 1520: 1518: 1480: 1479: 1464: 1437: 1314: 1310: 1308: 1248: 1237: 1212: 1187: 1180: 1179: 1164: 1092: 1070: 1044: 921: 857: 834: 788: 781: 780: 746: 739: 738: 696:Andy M. Wang 692: 675: 668: 667: 658: 654: 650: 646: 644: 623: 596: 524:my talk page 521: 513: 510: 503: 500: 484:PSR B1937+21 462: 435: 429: 381: 325: 306: 281: 251: 218: 199: 168: 165: 130: 56: 39: 33: 31: 29: 27: 25: 2935:Niteshift36 2919:Niteshift36 2832:take office 2757:Normal flow 2438:Talk:Amouli 2432:RFC Closure 2309:Wait until 2137:WP:HIGHBEAM 2130:WP:HIGHBEAM 1959:Deplorables 1531:round-robin 1440:Move review 1350:WP:OFFICIAL 1344:is part of 1244:Fobos-Grunt 1073:Move review 899:S Philbrick 865:S Philbrick 858:Please see 620:Round-robin 501:Hello JFG, 3721:Bob K31416 3719:Thanks. -- 3708:WP:PRECISE 3702:Bob K31416 3686:Bob K31416 3612:discussion 3563:Datestamps 3136:this edit, 3134:Regarding 3110:Usernamen1 3077:Usernamen1 3062:Usernamen1 2851:  2826:President- 2485:WP:USPLACE 2461:WP:CONCISE 2457:WP:USPLACE 2450:Sure. Per 1937:And I see 1311:guidelines 703:Article 50 663:WP:PMVR#rr 48:Archives: 3745:JustBerry 2160:Arxiloxos 2144:Arxiloxos 1965:this edit 1883:RfC close 1698:See also 1596:stonewall 1379:Enjoy! — 1319:WP:POLICY 1017:Ymblanter 990:Ymblanter 959:Ymblanter 938:that was 924:Ymblanter 879:You mean 841:IanOsgood 563:Tpdwkouaa 544:Tpdwkouaa 528:Tpdwkouaa 436:Ali Zifan 3577:Mandruss 3480:Mandruss 3424:Amen. — 3409:Mandruss 3402:de facto 3377:Mandruss 3358:Mandruss 3225:contribs 3213:unsigned 3182:contribs 3170:unsigned 2882:Mandruss 2660:Mandruss 2642:Mandruss 2543:Gopher65 2523:Gopher65 2385:Thanks. 1985:Scjessey 1969:Scjessey 1720:1 to 100 1577:New York 1500:Mandruss 1481:Mandruss 1315:policies 1175:WP:MULTI 1134:Dicklyon 1111:Dicklyon 1095:Dicklyon 1081:Dicklyon 1051:Kylo Ren 343:. I see 309:Todd4069 284:Todd4069 254:Todd4069 238:Todd4069 221:Todd4069 3640:WP:TPNO 3556:Tallies 3317:GoodDay 3294:GoodDay 3278:GoodDay 2597:Satbuff 2581:Satbuff 2565:Satbuff 2452:WP:RMCI 2387:GoodDay 2370:I have 2358:GoodDay 2331:GoodDay 2315:GoodDay 2297:GoodDay 2193:selbert 2166:Lingzhi 1943:Andrewa 1925:Andrewa 1892:Andrewa 1800:Andy W. 1733:Andy W. 1726:the RfC 1669:Comment 1541:Andy W. 1448:Anonimu 1406:Anonimu 1367:Anonimu 1323:Anonimu 1246:case). 1181:Andy W. 782:Andy W. 740:Andy W. 669:Andy W. 639:Jenks24 459:MEO/MTO 354:Appable 350:notable 202:Nizolan 185:Nizolan 171:Nizolan 3661:WP:TPO 3644:WP:TPO 3075:Hello 2867:dates. 2748:office 2233:Lihaas 1868:BD2412 1849:bd2412 1601:Certes 1354:WP:RGW 1288:AMC-14 1233:MUOS-5 1216:– See 1004:WP:BLP 904:(Talk) 870:(Talk) 339:, and 329:WP:GNG 234:Hello 82:Awards 3248:Feran 3217:Feran 3195:Feran 3174:Feran 2746:take 2481:WP:AT 2281:MB298 2265:MB298 2100:Paine 2065:Paine 2017:Paine 1594:will 1592:owner 1346:WP:AT 1317:(see 92:Drama 16:< 3749:talk 3725:talk 3690:talk 3668:. — 3642:and 3636:This 3530:talk 3518:most 3386:. — 3321:talk 3282:talk 3221:talk 3178:talk 3144:talk 3114:talk 3066:talk 3030:talk 3007:talk 2981:talk 2955:talk 2923:talk 2874:nbsp 2871:nobr 2617:Re: 2601:talk 2569:talk 2529:talk 2498:╠╣uw 2463:and 2442:╠╣uw 2422:talk 2391:talk 2362:talk 2319:talk 2301:talk 2269:talk 2237:talk 2187:Nevé 2148:talk 1973:talk 1947:talk 1929:talk 1914:. — 1896:talk 1809:talk 1742:talk 1709:talk 1688:talk 1660:talk 1605:talk 1550:talk 1522:here 1465:Re: 1452:talk 1410:talk 1371:talk 1327:talk 1294:. — 1263:talk 1220:. — 1213:Done 1190:talk 1138:talk 1099:talk 1085:talk 1055:talk 1047:here 1021:talk 1006:. — 994:talk 963:talk 928:talk 845:talk 814:. — 808:Andy 806:Yes 791:talk 766:Andy 749:talk 678:talk 630:and 610:talk 597:Done 567:talk 532:talk 488:talk 467:and 404:talk 358:talk 313:talk 288:talk 258:talk 225:talk 138:talk 87:Bots 77:2020 72:2019 67:2018 62:2017 57:2016 3712:JFG 3670:JFG 3646:.- 3617:Rob 3567:3. 3561:2. 3554:1. 3492:', 3447:JFG 3426:JFG 3388:JFG 3331:JFG 3308:JFG 3255:JFG 3237:JFG 3201:JFG 3152:JFG 3096:JFG 2993:JFG 2941:JFG 2899:JFG 2855:JFG 2834:on 2658:Hi 2588:JFG 2549:JFG 2489:JFG 2378:JFG 2350:yet 2341:JFG 2287:JFG 2248:JFG 2210:JFG 2170:JFG 2135:At 2088:JFG 2052:JFG 1999:JFG 1916:JFG 1874:JFG 1826:JFG 1815:ctb 1788:JFG 1772:JFG 1748:ctb 1635:JFG 1621:or 1568:JFG 1556:ctb 1506:JFG 1442:of 1420:JFG 1381:JFG 1358:JFG 1296:JFG 1290:or 1272:Hi 1231:On 1222:JFG 1196:ctb 1148:JFG 1125:JFG 1075:of 1008:JFG 981:JFG 950:JFG 889:JFG 816:JFG 797:ctb 770:JFG 755:ctb 728:vs 716:JFG 706:to 684:ctb 577:JFG 554:JFG 548:As 479:JFG 450:JFG 415:JFG 369:JFG 299:JFG 274:JFG 244:JFG 191:JFG 181:Hi 153:JFG 102:Old 97:Fun 3751:) 3727:) 3692:) 3684:-- 3648:Mr 3621:13 3532:) 3505:is 3323:) 3306:— 3284:) 3227:) 3223:• 3184:) 3180:• 3146:) 3116:) 3068:) 3032:) 3009:) 2983:) 2957:) 2925:) 2792:dʒ 2784:əl 2707:dʒ 2699:əl 2603:) 2571:) 2428:. 2424:) 2393:) 2364:) 2321:) 2303:) 2271:) 2239:) 2150:) 1997:— 1975:) 1949:) 1931:) 1898:) 1711:) 1694:. 1690:) 1662:) 1633:— 1607:) 1588:No 1527:js 1454:) 1412:) 1373:) 1329:) 1265:) 1140:) 1123:— 1101:) 1087:) 1057:) 1023:) 996:) 979:— 965:) 930:) 883:→ 862:-- 854:?? 847:) 778:— 612:) 604:. 569:) 534:) 490:) 406:) 360:) 335:, 315:) 290:) 260:) 227:) 140:) 3747:( 3723:( 3704:: 3700:@ 3688:( 3651:X 3584:☎ 3572:― 3528:( 3416:☎ 3379:: 3375:@ 3365:☎ 3319:( 3296:: 3292:@ 3280:( 3250:: 3246:@ 3219:( 3197:: 3193:@ 3176:( 3142:( 3112:( 3064:( 3028:( 3005:( 2979:( 2953:( 2937:: 2933:@ 2921:( 2889:☎ 2877:― 2818:/ 2815:p 2812:m 2809:ʌ 2806:r 2803:t 2798:n 2795:ɒ 2787:d 2781:n 2778:ɒ 2775:d 2772:ˈ 2769:/ 2765:( 2733:/ 2730:p 2727:m 2724:ʌ 2721:r 2718:t 2713:n 2710:ɒ 2702:d 2696:n 2693:ɒ 2690:d 2687:ˈ 2684:/ 2680:( 2649:☎ 2637:― 2599:( 2583:: 2579:@ 2567:( 2545:: 2541:@ 2420:( 2415:. 2389:( 2360:( 2333:: 2329:@ 2317:( 2299:( 2283:: 2279:@ 2267:( 2235:( 2229:) 2225:( 2206:: 2202:@ 2190:– 2162:: 2158:@ 2146:( 2110:c 2107:/ 2075:c 2072:/ 2043:: 2039:@ 2027:c 2024:/ 1987:: 1983:@ 1971:( 1945:( 1927:( 1894:( 1870:: 1866:@ 1856:T 1817:) 1812:· 1805:( 1784:: 1780:@ 1763:: 1759:@ 1750:) 1745:· 1738:( 1715:. 1707:( 1702:. 1686:( 1681:. 1658:( 1603:( 1558:) 1553:· 1546:( 1525:( 1502:: 1498:@ 1488:☎ 1450:( 1408:( 1369:( 1325:( 1261:( 1198:) 1193:· 1186:( 1136:( 1113:: 1109:@ 1097:( 1083:( 1053:( 1019:( 992:( 961:( 926:( 843:( 799:) 794:· 787:( 757:) 752:· 745:( 698:: 694:@ 686:) 681:· 674:( 659:A 655:B 651:A 647:A 608:( 565:( 546:: 542:@ 530:( 486:( 481:: 477:@ 402:( 356:( 311:( 286:( 256:( 240:: 236:@ 223:( 187:: 183:@ 136:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.