Knowledge

User talk:JFG/Archive 2020

Source πŸ“

308:? I just reviewed the basis for the rating that was given to WT and it is not only questionable, it is based on the opinions of a few. If we applied the same process to other sources that we applied to WT, we wouldn't have much to choose from. It is no longer a secret that over the past 2 or 3 years, politically-based news media has been widely criticized for inaccuracies, opinion journalism, propaganda and sensationalism throughout the echo chamber. We should approach all political news sources with caution, regardless of their political slant (and they all tend to slant). The following articles support my position: 1814: 1464: 919: 356: 167:
certainly for many others that I occasionally noticed but did not investigate fully. My comment about those timelines having become unfortunate "kitchen sinks" is still relevant as well, as editors are keen to preserve the smallest minutiae of detective work and daily reporting, even sometimes admitting they use Knowledge as a repository for personal research. Attempts at bringing some clarity to readers have been repeatedly squashed. My largest effort was to
856: 42: 1475: 1377: 1144: 1821: 1234: 1022: 641: 1209:'s in article space and portal space. I've seen it too many times to recount. Perhaps there should be a notability clause that if we don't reliably hear about your death/disappearance, your personal article is speedily deleted. Some deletions would be counter-productive to creating an encyclopedia, but most would probably be for the best. 1181:? I'm hoping to add someone to the article, but I can't read Japanese, so could you please read the attached source to see if the woman's name and full date of birth are included? Katsue Kurimoto should be 113 and the oldest in Nara Prefecture if that helps. Thank you for any help that can be provided. Sincerely, 1837:
has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality
680:
JFG, thank you for the advice on leaving shorter rationales for my edits. I will save my longer explanations for the talk page for now. There is an interesting rfc at the bottom of the talk page for Donald Trump regarding new proposed text that is more encyclopedic and less sensationalized. Perhaps
936:
can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the
516:
is problematic. One way or another, the article must agree with any specific text specified in the consensus item, and they have already diverged. If we say that the consensus was really only for the period/full stop, not specific text, then the consensus item should not specify specific text. And
374:
discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to
712:
Roughly the second half of it is devoted to a brief explanation of how to go about advocating such changes in a way that doesn't waste their time and ours, followed by a few pointers to resources for learning how to do that, which they may (1) use or (2) ignore because they are just ways for evil
236:
I'm not aware that there is a consensus that The Washington Times is reliable for facts, or that that would negate the advice to avoid it for US race relations and US politics. If there is such a consensus, it should recorded at RSP. Nonetheless, the fact reported in The Washington Times was that
166:
Yes, a few editors have "promoted" the Russia–Trump investigation timelines into the "See also" sections of dozens of articles, even when such investigations found nothing relevant about the article subject. That was the case for Steve Bannon, as referenced in the talk page comment you cited, and
708:
look biased to some Trump supporters who don't understand Knowledge policy. It will never stop looking biased to some, nor should it. Can't (won't) speak for BR/Valjean's essay, but there is exactly nothing in my page that suggests that article couldn't stand improvement in Trump's favor.
1204:
show that at her current alleged age of 112 years and 174 days, over 80% of supercentenarians have already died, and there's no reliable proof she even made it that far. In any event, no one should agonize over this case... but it does bring up the Knowledge flaw of repeatedly creating
1852:
has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
733:
It occurs to me that these comments always start with an assumption of bad faith, which is always forgiven because they are not from actual editors. Their ignorance earns them a pass on one of the most essential principles of editing. I say competence is required.
207:"There is consensus that The Washington Times is marginally reliable, and should be avoided when more reliable sources are available. The Washington Times is considered partisan for US politics, especially with regard to climate change and US race relations." 1075:
Fro the diff you point to, it ooks like the poster first tried the normal "subst:alert" way to notify you, and seeing that it triggered the "I'm aware" reply, proceeded to copy/paste the full wikicode of the alert, to make damn sure you've taken notice. β€”
713:
Trump-hating Knowledge editors to impose their biased views on Knowledge articles. It stands to reason that many Trump supporters will view Knowledge policy as "fake policy" – even if they actually read any of it – much like their leader's "fake news". ―
538:
Yes, somebody already applied a copyedit to the talk page phrasing, which is fine in my opinion because the core of the discussion deals with the conjunction to use between House and Senate processes, so that exact text should not be set in stone.
257:
Thanks for finding other RS. Prior to my edit, the statement was not supported by any citation at all. I suppose it was initially added with an even-worse source, that later got removed. Agree with you on neutral tone, simply "said". β€”
168: 497:
My bad, I misread item #20, which happens to have been amended a couple years ago while I was on wikibreak. New discussion needs more participation before we can change the text – and I'm involved, so can't judge consensus. β€”
181: 1527:
which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the
1420: 1404:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 171:, but that remained largely ignored. I see now that the timelines have been split into half-year chunks, which in my opinion does nothing to help readers parse and understand the subject matter. β€” 949:
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
760: 799: 863: 371: 1485:
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by
1155: 1390: 321: 284:
Not exactly. Both are considered generally reliable. While I personally would usually avoid Mother Jones for anything controversial, Vox is a reputable source, albeit left leaning. -
973: 476:, if you want to claim a consensus in that discussion and nobody objects, go for it. I don't care, but I do care about maintaining the integrity of the list, which you didn't do. ― 580:
In 2018, you offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has now accepted that request for arbitration, and an arbitration case has been opened at
1294: 1861: 992: 656: 457: 1030: 589: 585: 412: 383:
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the
1287: 227:
Sure, and I did check RSP before adding it. Even if partisan, it's reliable for citing facts, and that's how it's used in my edit, quoting a statement by Trump. β€”
1529: 342: 305: 980: 581: 543:
if we remove the text entirely, the consensus item may be wrongly interpreted. To clarify this, I'll add "For example" before the sentences. β€”
445:
type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of
1178: 588:. Please add your evidence by March 23, 2020, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, 1442: 1322: 1026: 1003: 827: 419: 309: 101: 1085:
Really? Hmmmm. Is it also a possibility that he never used the DS alert template and simply went with the copy/paste as his first edit?
1151: 1014: 764: 634: 803: 1243: 1038: 401: 1438: 1318: 999: 966: 959: 600: 596: 426: 1474: 1521:
who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by
820:- JFG, I've been waiting for your input in your absence. I'm itching to start the RfC. The body already supports the text. 1715: 449:
for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
1413: 81: 1559: 1425: 91: 1286:
If you have any suggestions on what to add to the newsletter please leave a note at the newsletter discussion here:
313: 933: 86: 71: 66: 61: 56: 96: 112: 1711: 833: 665: 317: 241: 1177:
Hello, JFG. I hope you are keeping well. I was wondering if you could please take a look at my latest post at
1122: 1095: 1066: 334: 158: 1767: 1555: 1214: 1186: 1147: 890: 876: 1293:
If you wish to have the newsletter added to your talk page on release then please add your name to here:
182:
Talk:Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections#Requested move 23 December 2019
1401: 1813: 1034: 1033:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
795: 686: 384: 202: 1611: 822: 660: 1689: 1637: 1585: 1309: 744: 723: 623: 584:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at 562: 527: 486: 138: 117: 855: 1279:
newsletter is starting up again, the first new issue will be published on the 1 November 2020.
1763: 1741: 1663: 1463: 1384: 1210: 1182: 918: 886: 872: 438: 388: 355: 1491:
who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to
1793: 1432: 1397: 1162: 938: 267:
Regarding partisanship of sources, that would cut both ways, imagine for example we removed
114: 41: 1412:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1116: 1089: 1060: 775: 682: 592:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Knowledge:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. 328: 152: 1031:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 29#Template:International Space Station
1607: 1409: 446: 1685: 1633: 1581: 1405: 1343: 1267: 735: 714: 610: 553: 518: 477: 442: 408: 288: 248: 217: 210: 134: 17: 1820: 1737: 1659: 1354: 1197: 1376: 116: 1789: 1446: 1361: 1347: 1326: 1218: 1190: 1167: 1159: 1125: 1107: 1098: 1080: 1069: 1042: 1007: 962:
on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
904: 894: 880: 838: 807: 782: 768: 749: 728: 690: 670: 648: 627: 567: 547: 532: 502: 491: 337: 292: 279: 262: 252: 231: 221: 201:
Hi JFG. I hope you're prospering in the new year. I wanted to let you know that
188: 175: 161: 142: 1262:
This is a one-time notification to all active WikiProject Spaceflight members.
275:
from this article because they are partisan. Not a great outcome, I suppose. β€”
1206: 1113: 1086: 1057: 606:
The secondary mailing list is in use for this case: arbcom-en-b@wikimedia.org
325: 149: 1200:, I came to the same result when I looked, which you likely already guessed. 404:
around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
1233: 1358: 1338: 1104: 1077: 901: 789: 779: 544: 499: 285: 276: 259: 245: 228: 214: 185: 172: 1416:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1021: 640: 1503:
who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to
1394:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
343:
Category:Wikipedians with red-linked categories on their user talk page
304:
Hi, JFG - do you have any idea who decides the final rating of a RS at
900:
Thanks Gerda, it feels good to see you around at least once a year. β€”
1511: 131:
JFG, I saw that you commented on a series of timeline articles here
205:
is not considered a good source for Knowledge's purposes, and that
387:. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at 969:
about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
1848: 1833: 1523: 1505: 1429:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 237:
Trump "defended" his remarks, not "clarified" them as you wrote.
133:]. Have you seen this as a problem over a number of articles? 1499: 1487: 1419:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
1304: 1517: 1493: 1388:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
1201: 118: 35: 647:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
1819: 1812: 1462: 987:
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
917: 639: 354: 1856:
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
1258: 452:
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
422:
with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
1156:
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page
184:, which may help you understand where I'm coming from. β€” 1860:
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself
1805: 1802: 1779: 1776: 1753: 1750: 1727: 1724: 1701: 1698: 1675: 1672: 1649: 1646: 1623: 1620: 1597: 1594: 1571: 1568: 1400:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1053: 991:
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself
983:
to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.
976:
for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
818: 701: 513: 473: 456:
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself
238: 1295:
Knowledge:WikiProject Spaceflight/Downlink/Recipients
1025:
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
862: 590:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog/Workshop
586:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog/Evidence
1154:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 1138:Nomination for deletion of Template:Time interval 1056:didn't trigger the long list of my DS awareness? 1013:"Template:International Space Station" listed at 603:are being read into the evidence for this case. 1288:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Spaceflight/Downlink 1225:WikiProject Spaceflight newsletter notification 1228: 945:Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate 941:, your help could really make a difference. 148:I am also interested in your response, JFG. 8: 848: 517:there's a self-evident formatting problem. ― 306:Knowledge:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources 655:redirect, you might want to participate in 1534: 1371: 1336:Mythical concept? see the refs for FDRs. 854: 847: 793: 651:. Since you had some involvement with the 582:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog 429:to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn. 348:New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020 1846:As a special recognition and thank you 1231: 1103:No. Check the two diffs in sequence. β€” 595:All content, links, and diffs from the 911:New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020 761:2600:1002:B12B:A46B:FDC6:A409:4468:F76 206: 1179:Talk:List of the oldest living people 800:2601:8A:4102:B3A0:342A:145A:11B2:5EA9 774:Sure; you can read all about them at 7: 1385:2020 Arbitration Committee elections 1027:Template:International Space Station 439:Geographic regions, areas and places 1456:New Page Patrol December Newsletter 1368:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message 937:queue, the highest it's been since 681:you would like to weigh in! Cheers 169:sort the timeline by subject matter 24: 979:Also ending with no change was a 759:Do you know how talk pages work? 209:More information can be found at 1473: 1375: 1232: 1142: 1020: 40: 1842:NPP Technical Achievement Award 1423:and submit your choices on the 1029:. The discussion will occur at 929:Your help can make a difference 704:, it's hard to dispute that it 609:For the Arbitration Committee, 407:A recent discussion of whether 375:make the discussion a success. 240:"Although" also added a bit of 1868:18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC) 1275:I am notifying you, that thep 1191:04:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC) 1168:21:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC) 965:Also at the Village Pump is a 464:16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC) 180:Also, I just commented on the 1: 1447:01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC) 1402:Knowledge arbitration process 1362:11:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC) 1353:Only made sense for FDR. And 1348:05:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC) 1261: 568:09:22, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 548:09:19, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 533:09:12, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 503:18:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC) 492:10:53, 14 February 2020 (UTC) 1327:16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC) 1219:03:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC) 443:general notability guideline 338:10:22, 16 January 2020 (UTC) 293:12:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC) 280:12:47, 14 January 2020 (UTC) 263:12:44, 14 January 2020 (UTC) 253:12:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC) 232:12:31, 14 January 2020 (UTC) 222:12:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC) 411:restraunts are notable was 211:WP:RSP#The Washington Times 189:07:07, 3 January 2020 (UTC) 176:06:24, 3 January 2020 (UTC) 162:22:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC) 143:22:04, 2 January 2020 (UTC) 1882: 1439:MediaWiki message delivery 1319:MediaWiki message delivery 1000:MediaWiki message delivery 905:22:45, 30 March 2021 (UTC) 778:. Welcome to Knowledge! β€” 691:16:36, 12 April 2020 (UTC) 671:19:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC) 1253:WikiProject Notification 1238: 1126:18:59, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 1108:18:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 1099:18:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 1081:18:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 1070:16:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 1043:13:35, 29 June 2020 (UTC) 1008:02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 953:Discussions and Resources 895:08:47, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 881:06:40, 21 June 2019 (UTC) 853: 839:11:43, 12 June 2020 (UTC) 628:17:37, 9 March 2020 (UTC) 395:Discussions and Resources 38: 1437:to your user talk page. 1015:Redirects for discussion 974:speedy deletion criteria 808:17:31, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 783:16:12, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 769:14:56, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 635:Redirects for discussion 633:"President T" listed at 413:archived without closure 1245:WikiProject Spaceflight 1048:Question about DS aware 750:14:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC) 729:11:28, 4 May 2020 (UTC) 659:if you wish to do so. 657:the redirect discussion 576:Arbitration case opened 552:Works for me. Thanks. ― 366:Source Guide Discussion 1824: 1817: 1467: 1152:nominated for deletion 1148:Template:Time interval 922: 676:Thanks for the advice! 644: 441:generally do not need 359: 1823: 1816: 1466: 1398:Arbitration Committee 1382:Hello! Voting in the 921: 885:... four years now -- 643: 358: 1828:Reviewer of the Year 844:Precious anniversary 203:The Washington Times 1712:DragonflySixtyseven 850: 1825: 1818: 1530:redirect whitelist 1468: 1414:arbitration policy 923: 645: 402:ongoing discussion 360: 1864: 1811: 1810: 1556:DannyS712Β botΒ III 1461: 1453: 1452: 1355:Napoleon's return 1315: 1314: 1257: 1256: 1119: 1092: 1063: 995: 916: 869: 868: 810: 798:comment added by 460: 353: 331: 242:WP:EDITORIALIZING 155: 127:Timeline articles 124: 123: 1873: 1859: 1851: 1836: 1535: 1526: 1520: 1514: 1508: 1502: 1496: 1490: 1477: 1460: 1436: 1379: 1372: 1308: 1307: 1259: 1246: 1236: 1229: 1146: 1145: 1117: 1112:I see that now. 1090: 1061: 1052:Do you know why 1024: 990: 915: 858: 851: 830: 825: 814:Lead immigration 747: 742: 726: 721: 696:Must look biased 668: 663: 618: 616: 565: 560: 530: 525: 489: 484: 455: 409:Michelin starred 372:NPP source guide 352: 329: 197:Washington Times 153: 119: 44: 36: 1881: 1880: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1847: 1838:over quantity. 1832: 1522: 1516: 1510: 1504: 1498: 1492: 1486: 1458: 1430: 1370: 1334: 1303: 1302: 1244: 1227: 1175: 1165: 1164:it has begun... 1143: 1140: 1121: 1094: 1065: 1050: 1041: 1018: 997: 972:A proposed new 913: 846: 828: 823: 816: 776:Help:Talk pages 757: 745: 736: 724: 715: 698: 678: 666: 661: 638: 614: 613: 578: 563: 554: 528: 519: 511: 487: 478: 470: 462: 350: 333: 314:Nieman, Harvard 199: 157: 129: 120: 115: 106: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1879: 1877: 1844: 1843: 1830: 1829: 1809: 1808: 1800: 1797: 1787: 1783: 1782: 1774: 1771: 1761: 1757: 1756: 1748: 1745: 1735: 1731: 1730: 1722: 1719: 1709: 1705: 1704: 1696: 1693: 1683: 1679: 1678: 1670: 1667: 1657: 1653: 1652: 1644: 1641: 1631: 1627: 1626: 1618: 1615: 1605: 1601: 1600: 1592: 1589: 1579: 1575: 1574: 1566: 1563: 1553: 1549: 1548: 1545: 1542: 1539: 1483: 1482: 1481:Year in review 1459: 1457: 1454: 1451: 1450: 1421:the candidates 1391:eligible users 1380: 1369: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1333: 1330: 1313: 1312: 1299: 1298: 1291: 1281: 1280: 1272: 1271: 1264: 1263: 1255: 1254: 1250: 1249: 1240: 1237: 1226: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1174: 1171: 1163: 1139: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1115: 1088: 1059: 1049: 1046: 1037: 1017: 1011: 985: 984: 977: 970: 963: 955: 954: 947: 946: 931: 930: 914: 912: 909: 908: 907: 867: 866: 860: 859: 845: 842: 815: 812: 786: 785: 756: 753: 697: 694: 677: 674: 637: 631: 577: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 510: 507: 506: 505: 469: 466: 436: 435: 431: 430: 423: 416: 405: 397: 396: 385:New Pages Feed 381: 380: 368: 367: 351: 349: 346: 327: 302: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 265: 198: 195: 194: 193: 192: 191: 164: 151: 128: 125: 122: 121: 113: 111: 108: 107: 105: 104: 99: 94: 89: 84: 79: 74: 69: 64: 59: 53: 50: 49: 46: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1878: 1869: 1865: 1863: 1857: 1854: 1850: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1835: 1827: 1826: 1822: 1815: 1807: 1806:Page Curation 1804: 1801: 1798: 1795: 1791: 1788: 1785: 1784: 1781: 1780:Page Curation 1778: 1775: 1772: 1769: 1765: 1762: 1759: 1758: 1755: 1754:Page Curation 1752: 1749: 1746: 1743: 1739: 1736: 1733: 1732: 1729: 1728:Page Curation 1726: 1723: 1720: 1717: 1713: 1710: 1707: 1706: 1703: 1702:Page Curation 1700: 1697: 1694: 1691: 1687: 1684: 1681: 1680: 1677: 1676:Page Curation 1674: 1671: 1668: 1665: 1661: 1658: 1655: 1654: 1651: 1650:Page Curation 1648: 1645: 1642: 1639: 1635: 1632: 1629: 1628: 1625: 1624:Page Curation 1622: 1619: 1616: 1613: 1609: 1606: 1603: 1602: 1599: 1598:Page Curation 1596: 1593: 1590: 1587: 1583: 1580: 1577: 1576: 1573: 1572:Page Curation 1570: 1567: 1564: 1561: 1557: 1554: 1551: 1550: 1546: 1543: 1540: 1537: 1536: 1533: 1531: 1525: 1519: 1513: 1507: 1501: 1495: 1489: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1476: 1471: 1465: 1455: 1449: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1434: 1428: 1427: 1422: 1417: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1393: 1392: 1387: 1386: 1381: 1378: 1374: 1373: 1367: 1363: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1331: 1329: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1311: 1310: 1306: 1296: 1292: 1289: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1273: 1270:project page 1269: 1266: 1265: 1260: 1252: 1251: 1247: 1241: 1239:The Downlink 1235: 1230: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1172: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1137: 1127: 1124: 1120: 1114: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1106: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1097: 1093: 1087: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1079: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1068: 1064: 1058: 1055: 1047: 1045: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1023: 1016: 1012: 1010: 1009: 1005: 1001: 996: 994: 988: 982: 978: 975: 971: 968: 964: 961: 957: 956: 952: 951: 950: 944: 943: 942: 940: 935: 928: 927: 926: 920: 910: 906: 903: 899: 898: 897: 896: 892: 888: 883: 882: 878: 874: 865: 861: 857: 852: 843: 841: 840: 837: 835: 831: 826: 819: 813: 811: 809: 805: 801: 797: 791: 784: 781: 777: 773: 772: 771: 770: 766: 762: 754: 752: 751: 748: 743: 741: 740: 731: 730: 727: 722: 720: 719: 710: 707: 703: 695: 693: 692: 688: 684: 675: 673: 672: 669: 664: 658: 654: 650: 642: 636: 632: 630: 629: 625: 621: 620: 619: 607: 604: 602: 598: 593: 591: 587: 583: 575: 569: 566: 561: 559: 558: 551: 550: 549: 546: 542: 537: 536: 535: 534: 531: 526: 524: 523: 515: 508: 504: 501: 496: 495: 494: 493: 490: 485: 483: 482: 475: 467: 465: 461: 459: 453: 450: 448: 444: 440: 433: 432: 428: 424: 421: 420:resource page 417: 414: 410: 406: 403: 399: 398: 394: 393: 392: 390: 386: 378: 377: 376: 373: 365: 364: 363: 357: 347: 345: 344: 340: 339: 336: 332: 326: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 294: 290: 287: 283: 282: 281: 278: 274: 270: 266: 264: 261: 256: 255: 254: 250: 247: 243: 239: 235: 234: 233: 230: 226: 225: 224: 223: 219: 216: 212: 208: 204: 196: 190: 187: 183: 179: 178: 177: 174: 170: 165: 163: 160: 156: 150: 147: 146: 145: 144: 140: 136: 132: 126: 110: 109: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 63: 60: 58: 55: 54: 52: 51: 47: 45: 43: 37: 34: 32: 30: 28: 26: 19: 18:User talk:JFG 1867: 1858: 1855: 1845: 1831: 1764:Hughesdarren 1544:Num reviews 1512:Hughesdarren 1484: 1472: 1469: 1424: 1418: 1395: 1389: 1383: 1337: 1335: 1316: 1300: 1277:The Downlink 1276: 1268:The Downlink 1211:Newshunter12 1198:Ruth Apilado 1183:Newshunter12 1176: 1141: 1051: 1019: 998: 989: 986: 948: 932: 924: 887:Gerda Arendt 884: 873:Gerda Arendt 870: 864:Three years! 821: 817: 794:β€”Β Preceding 787: 758: 738: 737: 732: 717: 716: 711: 705: 699: 679: 652: 646: 612: 611: 608: 605: 597:original ARC 594: 579: 556: 555: 540: 521: 520: 512: 480: 479: 471: 463: 454: 451: 437: 400:There is an 382: 369: 361: 341: 303: 272: 269:Mother Jones 268: 200: 130: 76: 39: 33: 31: 29: 27: 25: 1470:Hello JFG, 1426:voting page 1248:Newsletter 1035:Soumya-8974 934:NPP Sorting 925:Hello JFG, 653:President T 649:President T 362:Hello JFG, 1410:topic bans 1207:Sogen Kato 1202:Statistics 1160:* Pppery * 967:discussion 960:discussion 788:Thank you 755:Talk Pages 683:Bsubprime7 662:TheAwesome 601:latest ARC 389:WP:RPATROL 370:The first 48:Archives: 1849:DannyS712 1834:John B123 1608:JohnΒ B123 1541:Username 1524:DannyS712 1506:John B123 1406:site bans 1332:100 days. 1150:has been 1054:this edit 434:Refresher 379:Redirects 1686:Mcampany 1634:Onel5969 1582:Rosguill 1500:Onel5969 1488:Rosguill 1305:Terasail 1301:Thanks, 1173:Question 1039:contribs 981:proposal 849:Precious 824:starship 796:unsigned 790:User:JFG 739:Mandruss 718:Mandruss 599:and the 557:Mandruss 522:Mandruss 481:Mandruss 427:proposal 135:Springee 1738:Mccapra 1669:12,901 1660:JTtheOG 1643:19,879 1617:21,697 1591:63,821 1565:67,552 1518:Mccapra 1494:JTtheOG 1433:NoACEMM 468:Sparked 447:WP:SPAM 310:AP News 1803:Patrol 1799:3,958 1790:Utopes 1777:Patrol 1773:4,520 1751:Patrol 1747:4,918 1725:Patrol 1721:6,401 1699:Patrol 1695:9,103 1673:Patrol 1647:Patrol 1621:Patrol 1595:Patrol 1569:Patrol 1515:, and 939:ACPERM 829:.paint 617:Thomas 82:Awards 1538:Rank 1344:talk 92:Drama 16:< 1862:here 1794:talk 1768:talk 1742:talk 1716:talk 1690:talk 1664:talk 1638:talk 1612:talk 1586:talk 1560:talk 1547:Log 1497:and 1443:talk 1396:The 1357:. β€” 1323:talk 1242:The 1215:talk 1187:talk 1118:Talk 1091:Talk 1062:Talk 1004:talk 993:here 891:talk 877:talk 834:talk 804:talk 765:talk 706:must 702:this 687:talk 667:Hwyh 624:talk 514:This 474:this 458:here 330:Talk 244:. - 213:. - 154:Talk 139:talk 87:Bots 77:2020 72:2019 67:2018 62:2017 57:2016 1786:10 1359:JFG 1339:DGG 1196:On 1105:JFG 1078:JFG 902:JFG 792:! 780:JFG 700:Re 545:JFG 541:But 509:#42 500:JFG 472:Re 322:API 318:CJR 312:, 291:πŸ–‹ 277:JFG 273:Vox 271:or 260:JFG 251:πŸ–‹ 229:JFG 220:πŸ–‹ 186:JFG 173:JFG 102:Old 97:Fun 1796:) 1770:) 1760:9 1744:) 1734:8 1718:) 1708:7 1692:) 1682:6 1666:) 1656:5 1640:) 1630:4 1614:) 1604:3 1588:) 1578:2 1562:) 1552:1 1532:. 1509:, 1445:) 1435:}} 1431:{{ 1408:, 1346:) 1325:) 1317:-- 1217:) 1189:) 1158:. 1123:πŸ“§ 1096:πŸ“§ 1067:πŸ“§ 1006:) 958:A 893:) 879:) 871:-- 806:) 767:) 689:) 626:) 425:A 418:A 391:. 335:πŸ“§ 324:. 320:, 316:, 286:Mr 246:Mr 215:Mr 159:πŸ“§ 141:) 1792:( 1766:( 1740:( 1714:( 1688:( 1662:( 1636:( 1610:( 1584:( 1558:( 1441:( 1342:( 1321:( 1297:. 1290:. 1213:( 1185:( 1002:( 889:( 875:( 836:) 832:( 802:( 763:( 746:☎ 734:― 725:☎ 685:( 622:( 615:C 564:☎ 529:☎ 488:☎ 415:. 289:X 249:X 218:X 137:(

Index

User talk:JFG

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Awards
Bots
Drama
Fun
Old
Springee
talk
22:04, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Talk
πŸ“§
22:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
sort the timeline by subject matter
JFG
06:24, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections#Requested move 23 December 2019
JFG
07:07, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
The Washington Times
WP:RSP#The Washington Times
Mr
X
12:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑