77:. Those standards require you to have multiple third-party sources. If we didn't have those standards, we'd have 10,000 articles about everyone's dart league down at the corner pub they started last week. Lacking any other inarguable objective measure to define notability, we default to "if your organisation is worth writing about, someone will have written about it before Knowledge (XXG) does." Your article simply does not have third-party sources. Interestingly enough, one of the few Google hits for "Queensland Young Greens" is a "Marxist critique" which you didn't attempt to add to the article.
336:, and that seems the easiest compromise at this time. Should the YQG get some more third-party media coverage in the future, a split off to form a YQG page would work. Glad that we got back on the same page together and found a good solution, and I hope you'll find more interesting things to write about and improve here on WP now that the process is a more fleshed out. One of the key points of advice for new articles is "references first,
362:
160:
for deletion (neither
English nor Swedish version had external footnotes), and then messaged a good 5 people or so soliciting footnotes. I note that you yourself stepped up to the plate and provided two news references in Swedish; great work, and that's exactly what we need to find for QYG before it
107:
Hi Matt, Thanks for your response. The point I am trying to make is that I followed the template of similar youth wings in
Australia. They also don't have any third party references because the majority of information comes from the political websites. Of course I am going to raise concerns about why
196:
If you simply can't find references at the immediate moment, you could always put the QYG as a section of the
Queensland Greens overall party, and then later down the road once more articles are available about them, split it off as its own section. You can even leave categories at the YQG page so
151:
No worries, I think we just personality-clashed here a little bit; I'm usually pretty chill, but I got a little brusquer than I should have. I just felt like you were both ignoring and accusing me, so got a little testy, but I think we're just miscommunicating. I did indeed follow up on the other
84:
your article by userifying your draft, and then you go complaining that I "deleted" it. Frankly, I'm not thrilled about pushing this dialogue further if you're going to continue to ignore all good advice. If you want to go to someone else and ask them for advice, I'm certainly not stopping you.
182:
to have references or be
Speedily Deleted. If there are existing articles of those types which don't have references, it's mostly because nobody is holding said article up to scrutiny; that is, anyone who happens there either doesn't know the standard, or turns a blind eye because they like the
89:
says: "If no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then
Knowledge (XXG) should not have an article on it." I don't see how much clearer I can be. If you find some other aspect of Australian politics that you'd be interested in writing about, and can (in the case of
340:
article." It's really, really hard to write a good and credible article without references, and for people/orgs/biz/bands/books/etc. it's absolutely mandatory, so finding good references comes first. Thanks again for your good work, and looking forward to seeing more from you in the future.
383:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
254:
Can you have a look at the draft I have so far... Added a few more links, references, etc.. Is it any better? Still trying to find some additional news sources but haven't had so much luck. They don't appear to get much coverage in the media in
127:
This is the first article I've written and I just followed what other comparable articles did... I'm just confused as to why mine is unacceptable, whilst their's is fine.. Do you understand what I mean from looking at the other comparable
236:
Hi Matt. Just about to go to bed but wanted to quickly reply to your message. Thanks again, I appreciate the feedback. I'm the one that should be apologising. I just was a bit confused as to what was going on. I understand the process
183:
article. Since you asked for
Feedback, I reckoned it'd be honestly unfair to you to offer to turn a blind eye and then just hope that nobody else ever scrutinises it. The best bet is to come out strong with an unassailable new article.
117:
I appreciate what you are saying, however, I have placed a number of sources there. They are the only sources on the net. As to the marxist critique I'm looking for a way to include this within the article, thank you for providing the
90:
organistations or people) find multiple references, then by all means try again and post to request for
Feedback, but I'm not going to say "your article is fine" when it doesn't meet the guidelines. Are you tracking my concern here?
331:
be added, but put it up for PROD (proposed deletion in 7 days) to stir folks up to finally get around to doing it with
Swedish language sources. So thanks again for stepping up to the plate. I saw your addition to
40:
is a duplicate and confusing draft that we've repeatedly tried to delete so that you can focus on your userspace draft, so we won't have two separate versions floating around. Please allow the not-ready article at
73:
I feel I've responded to your messages several times, and that you continue to ignore what I'm explaining. The standards for articles about organisations and companies are laid out in
49:
so that we can get it published. Having both an articlespace and userspace draft can cause (as you see here) a lot of hassle, so just stick with your
Userspace draft, find a few good
74:
272:
If it's not acceptable yet, if I add it to the QLD Greens site, is there a way to add the info box also and keep it the same layout as what it would look like on it's own?
289:
Thanks again for taking the time to reply to all my posts :) I thought I would update the
Swedish Greens site. I'm Australian but I can speak Swedish so it made sense.
137:
Thanks for the assistance. I do appreciate it, the process has just been alot more frustrating then I had envisaged.. Next time I will focus on a different topic..
46:
33:
108:
my article is being deleted, yet comparable parties remain untouched. It is inconsistent and appears that you may have some political agenda.
210:
Hope this clears things up, and that I sound a little more reasonable and less like a jerk, and feel free to write me with any questions.
80:
You persist in accusing me of somehow picking on your article; you came asking for advice, I gave it to you, you ignored it, I moved to
379:
152:
unreferenced .org articles you mentioned, and messaged involved authors saying "you need citations, or it gets deleted". One article,
380:
18:
350:
99:
346:
215:
95:
58:
42:
37:
22:
370:
157:
366:
85:
However, any editor with any familiarity with Knowledge (XXG) is going to tell you the same. The policy
174:
I totally agree that there are other articles which do not meet WP standards. Technically, all articles
342:
211:
91:
54:
403:
389:
333:
307:
327:
Thanks again for footnoting the Swedish Greens page; I was totally sure that references
156:
has now been redirected to the main LNP page by another author, and I did also propose
385:
377:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
197:
that the redirect will send people directly to that particular section of the QGs.
153:
411:
393:
315:
219:
62:
178:
have references, and organizations, people, bands, businesses, etc. are
374:
45:
to be deleted and focus on improving the draft I saved for you at
369:
and Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
402:
Thanks for that. Sorry I didn't realise. I'll try it now :)
365:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
75:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability (organizations and companies)
68:
306:
Appreciate your thoughts on my latest version. Cheers
8:
69:Again, it's all covered under "Notability"
47:User:Jakeyboy1989/Queensland Young Greens
34:User:Jakeyboy1989/Queensland Young Greens
7:
14:
378:
360:
1:
32:Once again: your draft is at
161:moves out of drafting space.
51:neutral, third-party sources
28:Can't you review my draft?
428:
412:15:07, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
394:15:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
351:05:14, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
316:19:39, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
220:18:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
100:05:39, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
63:15:44, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
407:
311:
43:Queensland Young Greens
38:Queensland Young Greens
23:Queensland Young Greens
158:Young Greens of Sweden
53:and we'll be set.
356:Your recent edits
334:Queensland Greens
419:
382:
364:
363:
427:
426:
422:
421:
420:
418:
417:
416:
373:by typing four
371:sign your posts
361:
358:
71:
26:
19:Speedy deletion
17:IN RESPONSE TO
12:
11:
5:
425:
423:
415:
414:
398:
357:
354:
343:MatthewVanitas
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
212:MatthewVanitas
203:
202:
201:
200:
199:
198:
189:
188:
187:
186:
185:
184:
167:
166:
165:
164:
163:
162:
143:
141:
140:
139:
138:
132:
131:
130:
129:
122:
121:
120:
119:
112:
111:
110:
109:
92:MatthewVanitas
70:
67:
66:
65:
55:MatthewVanitas
25:
21:nomination of
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
424:
413:
409:
405:
401:
400:
399:
396:
395:
391:
387:
381:
376:
372:
368:
355:
353:
352:
348:
344:
339:
335:
330:
317:
313:
309:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
246:
235:
234:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
228:
221:
217:
213:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
204:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
181:
177:
173:
172:
171:
170:
169:
168:
159:
155:
150:
149:
148:
147:
146:
145:
144:
136:
135:
134:
133:
126:
125:
124:
123:
116:
115:
114:
113:
106:
105:
104:
103:
102:
101:
97:
93:
88:
83:
78:
76:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
44:
39:
36:. What is at
35:
31:
30:
29:
24:
20:
16:
404:Jakeyboy1989
397:
359:
337:
328:
326:
308:Jakeyboy1989
179:
175:
142:
86:
81:
79:
72:
50:
27:
367:talk pages
255:Australia.
128:articles??
154:Young LNP
87:explicity
180:required
386:SineBot
82:protect
375:tildes
176:should
329:could
237:now..
118:link.
408:talk
390:talk
347:talk
338:then
312:talk
216:talk
96:talk
59:talk
410:)
392:)
384:--
349:)
314:)
218:)
98:)
61:)
406:(
388:(
345:(
310:(
214:(
94:(
57:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
