87:
144:
24:
53:
or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our
113:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
45:
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
117:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
110:
99:
59:
207:
211:
199:
155:
133:
203:
103:
67:
58:
for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see
50:
186:
55:
151:
137:
225:
215:
123:
63:
31:
163:
No references since April 2008. Could not find significant coverage in reliable sources myself.
182:
98:
is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to
221:
119:
169:
94:
78:
35:
17:
168:
While all contributions to
Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be
23:
192:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
228:
127:
71:
39:
142:
22:
38:, and it appears to include material copied directly from
210:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
175:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
34:. I have performed a web search with the contents of
49:If substantial content is duplicated and it is not
111:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Robert Currie
8:
60:Knowledge:Donating copyrighted materials
181:notice, but please explain why in your
7:
100:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
170:deleted for any of several reasons
158:because of the following concern:
30:This is an automated message from
14:
109:The article will be discussed at
40:http://robertcurrie.com/index.htm
85:
229:18:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
128:23:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
72:02:13, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
214:allows discussion to reach
195:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
178:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
244:
206:exist. In particular, the
200:proposed deletion process
102:or whether it should be
187:the article's talk page
147:
27:
212:articles for deletion
156:proposed for deletion
146:
26:
62:for the procedure.)
204:deletion processes
148:
28:
134:Proposed deletion
235:
227:
197:
196:
180:
179:
145:
89:
88:
56:copyright policy
243:
242:
238:
237:
236:
234:
233:
232:
219:
208:speedy deletion
194:
193:
177:
176:
143:
141:
90:
86:
83:
21:
12:
11:
5:
241:
239:
218:for deletion.
198:will stop the
166:
165:
152:Jean Bouzerand
140:
138:Jean Bouzerand
131:
84:
82:
77:Nomination of
75:
64:CorenSearchBot
32:CorenSearchBot
20:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
240:
231:
230:
226:
224:
223:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
190:
188:
184:
173:
171:
164:
161:
160:
159:
157:
153:
139:
135:
132:
130:
129:
125:
121:
115:
112:
107:
105:
101:
97:
96:
95:Robert Currie
80:
79:Robert Currie
76:
74:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
52:
51:public domain
47:
43:
41:
37:
36:Robert Currie
33:
25:
19:
18:Robert Currie
16:
220:
202:, but other
191:
183:edit summary
174:
167:
162:
150:The article
149:
116:
108:
93:
92:The article
91:
81:for deletion
48:
44:
29:
222:Racconish
216:consensus
154:has been
120:bender235
104:deleted
185:or on
124:talk
68:talk
42:.
136:of
189:.
172:.
126:)
106:.
70:)
122:(
66:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
