1187:. Do you find it disruptive or insulting to post certain information with its sources? Does the fact that it is people who patrol recent changes give them the right to reverse and dismiss one's hard work just because it is "poorly worded"? What does it cost these people to make the appropriate correction instead of reversing? Suppose you make an edition with your sources but poorly drafted, these people who patrol recent changes come along and revert to you, do you think it is fair to revert instead of correcting which is more constructive than reverting? It should be reversed only if the editing is vandalistic or without sources but as a matter of principle and good faith the wording should be corrected. But well, I'm not going to argue any more, in order to avoid problems here, and I'm going to step aside from the whole DC Comics issue also for that purpose, and dedicate myself to other articles. At least I appreciate your good faith. Regards.
1084:: I have not insulted anyone. My edits are not disruptive and I have given sources to everything. Now this guy NJZombie, another one who has caused me problems, now says that the sources must be in Spanish and there are sources that are not. This is already bordering on xenophobia towards languages, as if English is the only one that exists, and you are doing the same by limiting me and preventing me from learning English. After my blocking; others have been reversing what I have been doing. There you see who are the ones doing disruptive edits. As I said on that page where I went from victim to victimizer; when you work as a team you never trip someone else up. You don't sabotage or hinder them. I didn't do that; I'm not the one who reverses on the grounds of misspelling. In
1521:; for him to do favours is to be someone else's servant. NJZombie is not even capable of going through the regular channels of reporting me on the Bulletin Board and complains to someone else as if we were still in elementary school. Procedures are being done wrong here. Besides, to be constructive is not to hinder the other; or as they say in other latitudes; not to put the stick in the wheel of the bicycle, or not to step on each other's hoses. I am sorry if what I did was not constructive; besides there is no news or evidence of the dissolution of the
1517:
guys like Barry Wom or NJZombie do to me for that already worn out argument of "Poorly worded". If you see my edits, especially improvement of several articles even created, you will see how I have contributed even with the respective sources and that my attempts to contribute to other articles have been thwarted by several users, especially Barry Wom and NJZombie. The first one neither does nor lets do, and that IP is right when he says that he has no humility; he is like Doña
Florinda in the Mexican series
538:
edits; he reverses what I did whether or not they are sourced. I accept that I did wrong, but NJZombie is doing worse, and Mike more so by threatening to block me. It makes me angry that people are meddling in issues they don't know about. Another question is; why Mike don't delete my edit in his discussion page? I tried to avoid this situation but it's ridiculous how this whole thing turned out. But for what it's worth: I'm sorry if I offended Mike. I reiterate: I never meant for it to end like this.--
1025:
821:
124:
1268:
1549:
1091:
and spurred on by them you threaten to block me forever. I accept my block with resignation but one thing is true; you take any claim as something personal and that is called lack of ethics. And all your words and the ones I have seen from those editors are a real offence against me. And finally, Christians are right in this phrase; do not judge because with the same yardstick you will be judged.--
1431:
345:
236:
196:
628:
1380:
299:
23:
66:
1525:, writing without sources is not constructive either. How do you expect me to build an encyclopedia if there are people who do not set an example? I am willing to change my attitude and improve my writing and whatever else you want, the question is whether others are willing to give in. That is why I am requesting my unblocking. Greetings.
1621:
Since your edits since the block was imposed have shown that you have every intention of continuing in the same ways that led to the block, including childish personal attacks on editors, allowing you talk page access is going to achieve nothing useful, and may result in wasting other editors' time.
1605:
is the epitome of what happens in several countries, especially
Colombia; criminals and politicians cover themselves, even with the same blanket. I had the best attitude to change but it is clear that here in Knowledge the administrators and users are overwhelmed by arrogance, those users who took it
430:
This block is arbitrary and an outrage. I did accept advice from good-hearted people and I put the corresponding references. But other users are reverting my contributions and threaten me with blocks. Do you think it is fair and good what these people are doing to me? A simple mistake is no reason to
1516:
I hereby politely and cordially request my release. This block imposed on me is an outrage, an injustice and an arbitrariness; the person who denounced me does not have the slightest proof, not even the most implausible, that I used that IP which I thank for having defended me from the bullying that
537:
I'm reading the guide to appealling blocks. I'm modifying my appeal. That guy Mike Allen finds my references and sources poorly and insufficient, and to make matters worse, the other guy NJZombie makes my life impossible by reversing what I did claiming he has no sources. You must look at NJZombie's
1090:
there was the phrase: It's not who we are underneath, but what we do that defines us. See the last few articles I modified and you'll see that those facts speak more for themselves. You judge me without knowing me and you also commit a vile injustice to me, just like those editors you don't know me
513:
You are absolutely right in saying that a simple mistake is no reason to block you, but that you weren't blocked for a simple mistake. You were blocked because of a combination of a number of unacceptable actions. An unblock request which refers to the actual reasons for the block is more likely to
100:
Apart from the issue of cited sources, even if Cain were considered for that role, that does not mean he became a household name for that reason, as the passage reads. Such a bit of information, if supported by a citation, would more properly go in Cain's own
Knowledge article, as it has nothing to
311:
from editing because of your persistent unsourced editing, because of the fact that instead of accepting advice and information from more experienced editors and learning from it, you respond with belligerent defiance, incivility and childish attacks, and refuse to comply with
Knowledge policies.
559:
Name a single edit I reverted for no source in which you actually provided one. As a new user, it’s common to have your edits reverted as you learn the proper way to edit. The goal is to learn and get better at editing and to not get angry and make personal attacks against those who correct your
1061:
In
January, 2023, you were blocked for two days for disruptive editing, after insulting other editors in your earliest edits. You barely edited for the next four months, and in June, 2023, you returned to your previous disruptive editing and insults. You are now blocked for two weeks. This is a
990:
In a post on that notice board, timed at 17:33, 15 January 2023, you wrote "And my hostility I put aside to avoid more trouble." You may like to read through your posts since then, and consider whether or not any of them may look hostile to other readers. In the same post you claimed that I had
1231:
Hey, you have no shame. You don't abide by that rule and you want others to abide by it? with that "It is not the job of other editors to correct your poor wording" you are just showing arrogance and 0 humility. If
Knowledge is for mutual collaboration, you and others are not doing it. You are
785:
Nobody, absolutely nobody called you here to intervene. I came here in good faith to contribute, but you and that other guy had to come to bother me. You mainly started all of this. I strongly ask you: leave me alone. What have I done to you? Have I messed with you? What's your problem?
504:
Here are a few pieces of advice which, if you follow them, may make it more likely that an administrator will accept your unblock request. It is, of course, entirely up to you whether you take the advice, but it is offered because I believe that if you do take it, then it may help you.
431:
block me. If I had insulted with worst words or threatened another user that would be unacceptable. And just when I am about to create my first article is when you block me. So I ask you to please unblock me. I'm new here in
Knowledge and I put sources in almost every contribution.
1170:
Nobody is trying to hound you or bother you, merely trying to prevent disruptive or insulting edits. There are people who patrol Recent
Changes (recent edits to Knowledge). This may be why it seems like random people are wandering in to revert your edits.
509:
Did you take the advice to read the guide to appealling blocks before posting your unblock request? If not, then I strongly recommend doing so now, and editing your request to take advantage of the advice provided in that
521:, it will not encourage them to lift the block, so in order to have a reasonable chance of being unblocked you should consider commenting on what you now think of that message, having had time to reconsider it.
953:
517:
You are more likely to persuade an administrator to unblock you if you attempt to address the issues which have been raised by your edits. For example, if an administrator reviewing your request sees
1601:
Don't tell me. Now telling the truth is making personal attacks. I am not evading any block and this block was put on me by you after that IP had also sung the truths to you on my discussion page.
1358:
you're very funny. I ask for sources about the United
Artists' defunction and you tell my edits are disruptive and unconstructive? Ask for the editor put sources is disruptive? LEAVE ME ALONE.--
703:
And what is it difficult for you to correct what I do instead of reverting? The edition war can be avoided if there are good deals between users. It is better that we come to good terms.--
600:
There was no argument to begin with. I just asked for an example of a sourced edit of yours that I reverted. None were provided. Other than that, I offered some simple advice. Good luck!
991:
called you a liar (although I hadn't) and you went on to say "There is nothing more offensive than a person being called a liar." Subsequently, at 18:26, 18 January 2023, you wrote "
312:
Please think about the reasons for the block, and take care not to make the same mistakes again after the block is over, so as to avoid having to be blocked from editing again.
556:”NJZombie makes my life impossible by reversing what I did claiming he has no sources. You must look at NJZombie's edits; he reverses what I did whether or not they are sourced.”
104:
If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of
960:, which is where it belongs. Also please note that if you make a report about an editor on an administrators' noticeboard you must inform that editor on their talk page.
1311:
983:
957:
159:
574:
Sir: Your own editing history gives you away. You are just proving me right. You are just justifying the unjustifiable. I am not going to argue with you any further.
442:
First, you're blocked for 48 hours; maybe it would be more productive to take a break and reflect on your actions. Because you seem to have a hot temper and a
1593:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
484:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1202:
Does the fact that it is people who patrol recent changes give them the right to reverse and dismiss one's hard work just because it is "poorly worded"?
1471:
385:
1398:
635:. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
900:
678:
1304:
1233:
669:
to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
1310:
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at
Knowledge's
1578:
1405:
1049:
469:
316:
1466:
380:
1206:
I'll simply repeat what I said to you in January of this year. "It is not the job of other editors to correct your poor wording. See
1344:
158:
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Knowledge's
1062:
collaborative project. If you cannot get along with your fellow editors, then Knowledge may not be the volunteer project for you.
279:
The one who started the personal attacks was you with your threats. So I am going to ask you the immense favor: LEAVE ME ALONE.--
904:
1555:
block evasion of prior blocks via IP addresses. As per policy, no comment on the IP addresses involved. Your doubling down on
43:
244:
1300:
1276:
1038:
674:
640:
152:
148:
128:
848:
does cite the person's nickname "Colombian Ed Wood". Only know for a few films in the 70s and 80s with only one being
999:
was as offensive as anything could be. If you don't drop your habit of attacking other editors with whom you disagree
892:
832:
810:
1217:. I'd recommend you stick to the claim that you're "not going to argue any more" and avoid disputing this reversion.
747:
Poor wording? What a way to treat other editors. You were not taught to treat others as you would like to be treated.
73:, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Knowledge cannot accept
1485:
1443:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1319:
896:
399:
357:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
78:
35:
1444:
1393:
1388:
1323:
1033:
684:
358:
307:
253:
201:
171:
1438:
1288:
1237:
352:
136:
39:
1322:, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in
986:. I expect you will see it there, but to avoid any doubt, I am also posting the substance of my message here.
1113:"I have not insulted anyone." Sure you haven't. Not unless you count the edit summaries in which you said...
1042:
932:
The article can be improved and there are plenty of sources for this great Colombian film director. So JA!
845:
670:
632:
443:
1355:
1339:
455:
113:
105:
969:
1207:
722:
1607:
1526:
1449:
1359:
1188:
1143:
1092:
933:
787:
748:
704:
575:
539:
491:
363:
280:
1420:
1296:
1292:
1222:
1184:
1172:
1067:
919:
908:
841:
773:
730:
693:
647:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
644:
636:
266:
248:
222:
207:
182:
144:
140:
86:
1133:
879:
605:
565:
450:
combative edit summaries are not making it a pleasant experience for others to work with you. —
1518:
875:
762:
55:
47:
1003:
then don't be surprised if you are indefinitely blocked from editing without further notice.
1587:
1328:
478:
451:
109:
90:
1564:
1291:
with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the
1024:
666:
849:
1522:
1416:
1280:
1272:
1218:
1081:
1063:
914:
768:
726:
689:
261:
217:
177:
167:
1142:
Hey, someone tell you "please comment bother and sabotage JeanCastì"? Leave me alone.
1627:
1556:
1165:
1129:
1086:
1008:
992:
965:
862:
828:
814:
601:
561:
526:
328:
1404:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Knowledge's
211:
139:
with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the
94:
51:
38:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
31:
27:
1267:
1559:
in this unblock request makes it very clear the indefinite block is appropriate.
861:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
853:
82:
74:
235:
195:
1631:
1615:
1602:
1568:
1560:
1534:
1424:
1367:
1349:
1241:
1226:
1196:
1178:
1151:
1137:
1100:
1071:
1012:
941:
926:
795:
780:
756:
734:
712:
697:
609:
583:
569:
560:
errors. Many of us, including myself, made the same mistakes when we started.
547:
530:
499:
459:
332:
288:
273:
229:
189:
117:
59:
1271:
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Knowledge, as you did at
1379:
298:
885:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
69:
Hi. Welcome to Knowledge, and thanks for working to improve the site with
1623:
1048:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
1004:
961:
522:
447:
324:
315:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
77:. Knowledge requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by
655:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
319:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
65:
22:
1124:"You don't know absolutely nothing about TV, specially colombian TV."
721:
It is not the job of other editors to correct your poor wording. See
995:
stop lying". Thus you were saying something to another editor which
89:) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an
1408:, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
1052:, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:
46:. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
665:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
954:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Non-autoconfirmed posts
30:. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
1429:
1378:
1213:
I have again just had to revert one of your edits for being
1023:
819:
343:
297:
258:. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
1575:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
466:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1595:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
486:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1499:
1495:
1489:
1480:
1476:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1214:
1126:
1123:
1120:
1117:
1114:
903:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
518:
413:
409:
403:
394:
390:
376:
372:
368:
70:
868:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
982:
I have posted a message in response to your posts at
42:
and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
1437:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
351:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
166:
If you continue to disrupt Knowledge, as you did at
1299:with them. Alternatively, you can read Knowledge's
1606:upon themselves to make my life impossible here.--
1041:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
660:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
147:with them. Alternatively you can read Knowledge's
1303:page, and ask for independent help at one of the
1037:temporarily from editing for persistently making
151:page, and ask for independent help at one of the
101:do with the topic of the Superman curse article.
1622:I have therefore removed your talk page access.
1318:Please ensure you are familiar with Knowledge's
984:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
958:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
1397:from editing because it appears that you are
8:
1121:"You don't know anything about Bond films."
761:It's becoming quite obvious this person is
844:. Only ref goes to a dead site that when
677:. In some cases, it may be appropriate to
856:the refs are YouTube, IMDb and interview.
631:You currently appear to be engaged in an
1410:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
1054:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
321:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
874:notice, but please explain why in your
1201:
1164:(Random person who wandered in, not a
948:Administrators' noticeboard post moved
1312:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
1118:"You don't know anything about this."
947:
160:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
7:
1232:despicable. Leave Jean Casti alone.
681:. If you engage in an edit war, you
863:deleted for any of several reasons
835:because of the following concern:
14:
1399:not here to build an encyclopedia
1287:If you are engaged in an article
679:request temporary page protection
135:If you are engaged in an article
1547:
1266:
626:
234:
194:
122:
64:
21:
247:on others again, as you did at
639:with others, to avoid editing
93:, which you can learn to make
1:
1127:"...AND PLEASE KISS MY 4SS."
1013:14:49, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
970:09:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
952:I have moved your post from
942:17:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
927:16:56, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
796:16:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
781:16:13, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
757:16:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
735:15:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
713:15:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
698:15:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
610:04:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
584:04:03, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
570:00:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
460:07:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
1441:, who declined the request.
907:allows discussion to reach
888:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
871:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
548:23:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
531:23:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
500:22:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
355:, who declined the request.
333:21:55, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
289:19:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
274:19:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
230:19:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
190:19:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
118:16:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
71:your edit to Superman curse
60:14:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
34:, but you didn't provide a
1647:
1632:08:28, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
1616:21:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
1569:20:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
1535:20:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
1425:00:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
1324:loss of editing privileges
1275:. Your edits appear to be
1242:17:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
899:exist. In particular, the
210:Knowledge, as you did at
1579:guide to appealing blocks
1406:guide to appealing blocks
1368:01:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
1350:01:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
1279:and have been or will be
1227:11:34, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
1197:20:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
1179:13:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
1159:Non-administrator comment
1152:02:28, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
1138:02:26, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
1101:03:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
1072:04:03, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
1050:guide to appealing blocks
1043:make useful contributions
893:proposed deletion process
470:guide to appealing blocks
317:guide to appealing blocks
44:referencing for beginners
1611:
1530:
1363:
1192:
1147:
1096:
937:
791:
752:
708:
645:try to reach a consensus
579:
543:
495:
284:
1320:policies and guidelines
880:the article's talk page
671:appropriate noticeboard
204:without further warning
1434:
1383:
1028:
859:
824:
444:battleground mentality
348:
302:
256:without further notice
1486:change block settings
1433:
1382:
1305:relevant noticeboards
1027:
905:articles for deletion
837:
833:proposed for deletion
823:
400:change block settings
347:
301:
153:relevant noticeboards
254:blocked from editing
249:User talk: MikeAllen
202:blocked from editing
172:blocked from editing
1293:article's talk page
997:in your own opinion
978:Continuing problems
141:article's talk page
1435:
1384:
1301:dispute resolution
1029:
897:deletion processes
825:
675:dispute resolution
349:
303:
206:the next time you
149:dispute resolution
129:disruptive editing
40:include a citation
1169:
1166:talk page stalker
1162:
811:Proposed deletion
127:Please stop your
1638:
1592:
1586:
1557:personal attacks
1551:
1550:
1505:
1503:
1492:
1474:
1472:deleted contribs
1432:
1411:
1347:
1342:
1335:
1331:
1270:
1163:
1160:
1156:
1055:
1039:disruptive edits
925:
922:
917:
890:
889:
873:
872:
822:
779:
776:
771:
650:Points to note:
630:
629:
483:
477:
419:
417:
406:
388:
386:deleted contribs
346:
322:
272:
269:
264:
245:personal attacks
238:
228:
225:
220:
198:
188:
185:
180:
126:
125:
75:uncited material
68:
25:
1646:
1645:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1598:
1590:
1584:
1583:, then use the
1572:
1548:
1538:
1493:
1483:
1469:
1452:
1445:blocking policy
1430:
1414:
1413:
1409:
1402:
1376:
1345:
1340:
1333:
1329:
1289:content dispute
1264:
1177:
1158:
1115:"You IGNORANT."
1058:
1057:
1053:
1046:
1021:
980:
950:
920:
915:
912:
901:speedy deletion
887:
886:
870:
869:
820:
818:
774:
769:
766:
627:
624:
489:
481:
475:
474:, then use the
463:
433:
407:
397:
383:
366:
359:blocking policy
344:
341:
336:
335:
320:
313:
267:
262:
259:
223:
218:
215:
183:
178:
175:
137:content dispute
123:
91:inline citation
36:reliable source
19:
12:
11:
5:
1644:
1642:
1619:
1618:
1573:
1545:
1541:Decline reason
1523:United Artists
1514:
1510:Request reason
1507:
1428:
1403:
1386:You have been
1385:
1377:
1375:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1316:
1315:
1308:
1273:United Artists
1263:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1234:152.200.176.25
1211:
1204:
1185:Edward-Woodrow
1176:
1173:Edward-Woodrow
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1075:
1074:
1047:
1031:You have been
1030:
1022:
1020:
1017:
1016:
1015:
979:
976:
974:
949:
946:
945:
944:
911:for deletion.
891:will stop the
817:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
740:
739:
738:
737:
716:
715:
663:
662:
657:
623:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
557:
551:
550:
534:
533:
515:
511:
464:
440:
436:Decline reason
428:
424:Request reason
421:
342:
340:
337:
314:
305:You have been
304:
296:
294:
292:
291:
243:; if you make
168:Batman Forever
164:
163:
156:
50:. Thank you.
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1643:
1634:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1604:
1600:
1599:
1597:
1596:
1589:
1582:
1580:
1571:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1544:
1542:
1537:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1513:
1511:
1506:
1501:
1497:
1491:
1487:
1482:
1478:
1473:
1468:
1464:
1463:global blocks
1460:
1459:active blocks
1456:
1451:
1446:
1442:
1440:
1439:administrator
1427:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1407:
1400:
1396:
1395:
1391:
1390:
1381:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1348:
1343:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1326:. Thank you.
1325:
1321:
1313:
1309:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1269:
1261:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1215:poorly worded
1212:
1209:
1208:WP:COMPETENCE
1205:
1203:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1174:
1167:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1128:
1125:
1122:
1119:
1116:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1089:
1088:
1087:Batman Begins
1083:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1060:
1059:
1051:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1035:
1026:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
989:
988:
987:
985:
977:
975:
972:
971:
967:
963:
959:
955:
943:
939:
935:
931:
930:
929:
928:
924:
923:
918:
910:
906:
902:
898:
894:
883:
881:
877:
866:
864:
858:
857:
855:
851:
847:
843:
836:
834:
830:
829:Jairo Pinilla
816:
815:Jairo Pinilla
812:
809:
797:
793:
789:
784:
783:
782:
778:
777:
772:
764:
760:
759:
758:
754:
750:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
736:
732:
728:
724:
723:WP:COMPETENCE
720:
719:
718:
717:
714:
710:
706:
702:
701:
700:
699:
695:
691:
688:
687:from editing.
686:
680:
676:
672:
668:
661:
658:
656:
653:
652:
651:
648:
646:
642:
638:
634:
621:
611:
607:
603:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
585:
581:
577:
573:
572:
571:
567:
563:
558:
555:
554:
553:
552:
549:
545:
541:
536:
535:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
507:
506:
502:
501:
497:
493:
488:
487:
480:
473:
471:
462:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
439:
437:
432:
427:
425:
420:
415:
411:
405:
401:
396:
392:
387:
382:
378:
377:global blocks
374:
373:active blocks
370:
365:
360:
356:
354:
353:administrator
338:
334:
330:
326:
318:
310:
309:
300:
295:
290:
286:
282:
278:
277:
276:
275:
271:
270:
265:
257:
255:
251:, you may be
250:
246:
242:
239:This is your
237:
232:
231:
227:
226:
221:
213:
209:
205:
203:
197:
192:
191:
187:
186:
181:
173:
170:, you may be
169:
161:
157:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
133:
132:
130:
120:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
67:
62:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
29:
24:
16:
1620:
1594:
1576:
1574:
1552:
1546:
1540:
1539:
1515:
1509:
1508:
1481:creation log
1448:
1436:
1415:
1394:indefinitely
1392:
1387:
1332:
1327:
1317:
1265:
1085:
1032:
1000:
996:
981:
973:
951:
913:
895:, but other
884:
876:edit summary
867:
860:
854:Spanish Wiki
842:WP:FILMMAKER
839:
838:
827:The article
826:
767:
682:
664:
659:
654:
649:
641:disruptively
625:
622:January 2023
503:
490:
485:
467:
465:
441:
435:
434:
429:
423:
422:
395:creation log
362:
350:
306:
293:
260:
252:
241:only warning
240:
233:
216:
212:Superman III
200:
193:
176:
165:
121:
106:my talk page
103:
99:
63:
48:my talk page
32:Superman III
20:
17:January 2023
1374:August 2023
1356:Wcquidditch
1295:, and seek
637:collaborate
452:Daniel Case
199:You may be
143:, and seek
110:Nightscream
26:Hello, I'm
1477:filter log
1277:disruptive
852:. On the
850:verifiable
763:WP:NOTHERE
391:filter log
108:. Thanks.
83:verifiable
1608:JeanCastì
1577:read the
1553:Confirmed
1527:JeanCastì
1496:checkuser
1455:block log
1450:JeanCastì
1417:Cullen328
1360:JeanCastì
1334:Quidditch
1297:consensus
1262:July 2023
1219:Barry Wom
1189:JeanCastì
1144:JeanCastì
1093:JeanCastì
1082:Cullen328
1064:Cullen328
1019:June 2023
934:JeanCastì
909:consensus
846:retrieved
831:has been
788:JeanCastì
749:JeanCastì
727:Barry Wom
705:JeanCastì
690:Barry Wom
667:talk page
643:, and to
576:JeanCastì
540:JeanCastì
519:this edit
492:JeanCastì
468:read the
410:checkuser
369:block log
364:JeanCastì
281:JeanCastì
208:vandalize
145:consensus
87:secondary
85:(usually
1519:El Chavo
1467:contribs
1281:reverted
1130:NJZombie
993:NJZombie
673:or seek
633:edit war
602:NJZombie
562:NJZombie
514:succeed.
448:ALL CAPS
381:contribs
79:reliable
1588:unblock
1490:unblock
1389:blocked
1034:blocked
685:blocked
683:may be
479:unblock
446:. Your
404:unblock
339:Unblock
308:blocked
52:DonIago
28:Doniago
878:or on
840:Fails
510:guide.
1603:Yamla
1581:first
1561:Yamla
921:Allen
775:Allen
472:first
268:Allen
224:Allen
184:Allen
1628:talk
1612:talk
1565:talk
1531:talk
1421:talk
1401:.
1364:talk
1238:talk
1223:talk
1193:talk
1148:talk
1134:talk
1097:talk
1080:Mr.
1068:talk
1009:talk
966:talk
938:talk
916:Mike
792:talk
770:Mike
753:talk
731:talk
709:talk
694:talk
606:talk
580:talk
566:talk
544:talk
527:talk
496:talk
456:talk
329:talk
285:talk
263:Mike
219:Mike
179:Mike
114:talk
95:here
56:talk
1624:JBW
1500:log
1447:).
1183:Hi
1175::)
1005:JBW
1001:now
962:JBW
956:to
813:of
523:JBW
414:log
361:).
325:JBW
323:.
214:.
174:.
97:.
1630:)
1614:)
1591:}}
1585:{{
1567:)
1543::
1533:)
1512::
1494:•
1488:•
1484:•
1479:•
1475:•
1470:•
1465:•
1461:•
1457:•
1423:)
1412:.
1366:)
1330:WC
1283:.
1240:)
1225:)
1210:."
1195:)
1150:)
1136:)
1099:)
1070:)
1056:.
1045:.
1011:)
968:)
940:)
882:.
865:.
794:)
765:.
755:)
733:)
725:.
711:)
696:)
608:)
582:)
568:)
546:)
529:)
498:)
482:}}
476:{{
458:)
438::
426::
408:•
402:•
398:•
393:•
389:•
384:•
379:•
375:•
371:•
331:)
287:)
131:.
116:)
81:,
58:)
1626:(
1610:(
1563:(
1529:(
1504:)
1502:)
1498:(
1453:(
1419:(
1362:(
1346:✎
1341:☎
1314:.
1307:.
1236:(
1221:(
1191:(
1168:)
1161:)
1157:(
1146:(
1132:(
1095:(
1066:(
1007:(
964:(
936:(
790:(
751:(
729:(
707:(
692:(
604:(
578:(
564:(
542:(
525:(
494:(
454:(
418:)
416:)
412:(
367:(
327:(
283:(
162:.
155:.
112:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
