1111:
it's obvious nothing ever gets done by doing that. And Power I used that word because
Newsweek used the word, which was the source of the addition. But seriously. I tried to add the fact that Fox News has been the highest rated cable network for 196 consecutive months, and someone deleted it like the next day. The notability of facts clearly isn't what gets stuff in the lead, so what's the criteria? Volunteer says it's about how many sources you can find that say it, which seems more than dubious. I wonder if I'd have any problems adding that New York Times thinks of itself as the "paper of record" into its lead? Oh never mind, it's already there.
1170:
without regular whinging about how the system is corrupt and the cards are stacked against them. If I were in their place, couldn't bring myself to do what JFG does, and couldn't shake my perception about systemic bias no matter how hard I tried, I would just call
Knowledge a lost cause, say a little Serenity Prayer, and find something else to do with my time. In any case, discussion about Knowledge liberal bias is certainly out-of-venue on an article talk page, and that never accomplishes anything except perhaps to add fodder for a topic ban proposal. ―
1611:
but you have certainly been disrupting
Knowledge. See Awilley's examples above (and having checked out your editing myself, I can say they're just a few examples of many.) But you were not blocked for that, only mildly topic banned (one month is a short tban). You were blocked as a sock of a banned user. Are you denying being Hidden Tempo? It doesn't look like you quite are — you just say you want to see the evidence, which sounds a little evasive (and that, if I may say so, sounds like Hidden Tempo). Are you Hidden Tempo? I'm pinging
837:
278:
984:
790:
1210:
1021:
supposed "rule violations" thrown in to try to get rid of YOU. I guess having only one political party represented in the mods has predictable results, but still scary. I'll try to keep what you said in mind, since it looks like they tried to do it to me too at the end there. The DYK process left a bad taste in my mouth once the POV people started jumping in but I might try again with a non-political article.
1416:
390:
680:
1346:
132:
908:
It was easier to hat the pre-existing comment. No judgment intended. Yes, it's best to ignore, Contrary to occasional appearances, we're writing an encyclopedia, and off-topic opinionating should be studiously ignored. Given the way things can spiral out of hand very quickly in this subject area it's
1501:
I didn't even get a warning for my topic ban, or a chance to appeal. Now before I get a chance to appeal, I find out that I was blocked without warning? I want to see this evidence that I'm another user. Otherwise, this looks like just another politically-motivated action on the part of the mods. If
1270:
if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the
893:
So you hatted his comment (promoting liberalism) and deleted mine (defending myself from his attack), and left no message warning of him getting "blocked" from editing, even though he was the one who initiated the spat. Interesting choice. I have no problem avoiding forum-like discussion. I asked to
1610:
How do you mean, you didn't get a chance to appeal? Information about how to appeal the topic ban is in
Awilley's pale yellow box above, posted on 10 August. It's still there, and sat there for 5 days before you were blocked. And you have just appealed the block. Yes, creating an article is useful,
1110:
I like how they included both liberals and conservatives in the example. Out of curiosity, have either of you ever run into a conservative mod? I've met like 7 or 8 so far and they've all been liberals, or defended liberal editors. I might just create some articles instead of debating stuff because
693:
1166:
Good admins enforce
Knowledge policies, within the limited discretion allowed them by our system. If that means coming down on the side of liberals far more often than that of conservatives, it doesn't necessarily follow that they are a "liberal admin". Correlation is not causation, and I've found
1020:
Thanks but no apology needed. What I saw people trying to do and especially the mods was shameful. It was subtle but I saw how people tried to kill two birds with one stone: shut down the conservatism project so those articles don't get improved, and then start attacking you personally with little
1005:
I am responsible for encouraging you to participate in DYK. This should have been a fun & rewarding experience. But I was too focused on using the Trump quote in the hook: which barring a miracle means your DYK will fail. Additionally you were inserted into my ANI case which can be a harrowing
945:
I warned you because you were the one I saw, and I was preparing dinner, so I didn't have time to scatter warnings around. Dinner was nice. For what it's worth, there are a couple of IPs I've recently blocked elsewhere who probably feel that I'm an agent of oppression against progressivism and The
206:
I'm not really an AFC person. I just happen to have permission for the script. And saw your comment on the draft. I can tell you within 24 hours this will be a very, very active article lol. It's important to add sources asap. Every paragraph must have an inline citation. Especially
Aftermath and
1169:
Even if there is a
Knowledge liberal bias, conservatives are not going to change it by making noise about it all the time, things just don't work like that. I advise conservative editors to look to user JFG for a model of how to represent the conservative viewpoint civilly, within the rules, and
1135:
avoids that mess.) Regarding Fox News - I don't care what Marek says, there are other concerns than the volume of sources for what should be included in the lead section of a very long article. I don't have a good definition for "what is encyclopedic in nature" beyond the
338:. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
713:
Hey just a heads up. The article is under consensus required. Judging from the article history it looks like you added a new section, then BullRangifer challenged part of it via revision. It should not be reinserted without consensus.
149:
1502:
Knowledge is making a serious effort to reverse constantly being under fire for anti-conservative and pro-liberal bias, this isn't the way to do it. And for that reason, I'm requesting an unblock as I didn't do anything wrong.
684:
138:
123:
255:
I think your article is a good candidate for "Did You Know." DYK is the easiest and funnest way to get your creation on to the Main Page and in front of the eyeballs of 17 million people. Learn all about it here:
1524:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
1248:
304:
to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The
Committee's decision is
358:
1596:
How do I prove the block is no longer necessary? I didn't damage or disrupt
Knowledge. I created an article, that's not useful? How do I go from a no-warning topic ban to a no-warning block?
153:
1263:
1244:
1240:
894:
take it to a private room twice, and everybody ignored me and kept right on talking about how great and fair the media is. What should I do in the future? Just delete their comments?
305:
301:
1456:
1313:
POV blindspot: NYTimes, Washington Post are "far-left propaganda tools of the
Democratic party". (By contrast Fox News is the most trusted network that "dominates" the competition.)
1061:. If you're simply here to make sure that political articles are "fair and balanced", you can expect the level of arguments you are currently engaged in to continue indefinitely.
1006:
experience for any editor, especially a new editor. This was not my intention and I regret this. Knowledge, and DYK, can be an enjoyable experience, if you fully appreciate the
931:
All right I get it, sorry. I still don't know why I got singled out and nobody else got a warning about getting blocked for going off topic, like Tataral and a few others did.
398:
382:
257:
707:
988:
1451:
540:
22:
1588:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1010:
If I can give you one piece of advice, always keep your cool and remain civil at all times. Civility blocks are far more common than people realize. –
797:
for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on
1470:
1267:
419:
63:
1573:
1551:
1387:
567:
319:
39:
1155:
1076:
459:
71:
1049:
626:
664:
415:
1236:
806:
310:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means
297:
167:
119:
1597:
1503:
1434:
1112:
1022:
932:
895:
810:
754:
606:
448:
327:
221:
1144:
is a fairly well-defined term, though I'm not sure why "All the News That's Fit to Print" hasn't been moved to the infobox.
620:
1317:
I do recommend that, as you suggested above, you spend some time creating articles instead of endlessly debating politics.
220:
Thank you for approving my article. I think it's a good start but I don't really know what you mean by inline citation....
163:
53:
1620:
1271:
appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.
532:
58:
1383:
1259:
for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
660:
1428:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
579:
323:
701:
1429:
1379:
1354:
1256:
845:
335:
1423:
1252:
1232:
524:
331:
311:
357:
Hi Jerry the Bellybutton Elf! Questions about the above “Alert”? I wrote a quick & dirty FAQ—check it out
691:
has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
1369:
1365:
1361:
1559:
1225:
1149:
1087:
1070:
734:
698:
512:
468:
408:
315:
44:
30:
404:
1048:
is inherently subjective, and not the type of content I'd want to include in the lead based on surveys
1057:
If you're here to build an encyclopedia, I'd strongly encourage you to contribute in areas other than
25:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
992:
955:
918:
880:
857:
822:
773:
719:
614:
504:
284:
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does
82:
34:
633:
496:
94:
74:, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Knowledge. You can visit the
1628:
1403:
1180:
1100:
208:
98:
75:
93:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
1555:
1325:
1279:
1255:
to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be
1145:
1066:
1058:
841:
794:
730:
688:
639:
362:
314:
administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the
946:
Truth About The Man. I'll have have a word with Tataral once I've cleaned up in the kitchen.
768:
Yeah it can be a tricky provision, especially determining when content was originally added.
1631:
1605:
1582:
1563:
1511:
1406:
1393:
1331:
1285:
1185:
1161:
1120:
1105:
1082:
1045:
I don't see any reason to include the results of opinion polls in the lead. "Most trusted"
1030:
1014:
995:
963:
940:
926:
903:
888:
865:
830:
777:
762:
747:
723:
668:
369:
351:
264:
229:
215:
201:
112:
1167:
this logical fallacy to be a common thread throughout all claims of Knowledge liberal bias.
1141:
949:
912:
874:
851:
816:
769:
715:
444:
86:
162:. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can
674:
DYK nomination of Inspector General Report on FBI and DOJ's Actions in the 2016 Election
1137:
836:
361:. If you have any questions about policies or editing or anything else just ask me on
277:
1624:
1399:
1382:. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
1292:
For your reference, here are a couple of examples of the behavior that led to this:
1171:
1091:
802:
108:
697:
and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
1364:
that was created to violate Knowledge policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
1320:
1274:
1209:
1126:
1011:
798:
366:
261:
235:
Don't mention it. An inline citation is the little blue number used for a reference
212:
198:
49:
789:
871:
I've hatted the equally inappropriate comment above yours, please stay on-topic.
186:
632:
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the
389:
625:
679:
629:
button, on the tool bar above Knowledge's text editing window, also does this.
343:
1614:
427:
159:
426:
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to
21:
Hello, Jerry the Bellybutton Elf, and welcome to Knowledge! Thank you for
1529:
the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Knowledge,
166:
without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
1345:
619:
1241:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision
1203:
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
753:
Thanks PackMecEng. My bad. Just a lot of text at the top of the page.
685:
Inspector General Report on FBI and DOJ's Actions in the 2016 Election
158:
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
139:
Inspector General Report on FBI and DOJ's Actions in the 2016 Election
124:
Inspector General Report on FBI and DOJ's Actions in the 2016 Election
909:
best to address developing ping-pong comment streams expeditiously.
131:
185:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
610:
90:
141:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
1131:
1340:
1051:. "Highest-rated" is better, but "dominated the competition"
288:
imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
117:
1414:
599:
560:
489:
437:
130:
991:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
840:
Please stop inserting forum-like discussion, as you did at
107:, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
418:– I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the
1570:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1262:
You may appeal this sanction using the process described
1220:
Topic banned from post-1932 American Politics for 1 month
174:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
1590:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1484:
1480:
1474:
1465:
1461:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1378:, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
1311:
1309:
1306:
1301:
1296:
1245:
Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions
1052:
1046:
187:
177:
103:
1541:
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
1422:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1251:. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the
1125:There are conservative admins; most of them avoid
414:If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at
1243:and, if applicable, the procedure described at
1041:I suppose there are two different points here:
989:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
536:– a summary of Knowledge's most important rules
1231:This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an
508:– quick reference on Knowledge's mark-up codes
403:I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to
326:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as
207:reaction. If you need any additional help ask
1535:the block is no longer necessary because you
1218:
793:Please refrain from using talk pages such as
613:(~~~~). This will automatically insert your "
8:
708:Special Counsel investigation (2017–present)
673:
544:– a thorough step-by-step guide to Knowledge
407:. As a first step, you may wish to read the
1216:The following sanction now applies to you:
102:
1538:understand what you have been blocked for,
1247:. This sanction has been recorded in the
463:(a tutorial orienting you with Knowledge)
195:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge!
1268:arbitration enforcement appeals template
617:" (your username and a date stamp). The
516:– an overview of Knowledge's foundations
156:to see how you can improve the article.
1544:will make useful contributions instead.
292:Please carefully read this information:
240:
528:– a Wizard to help you create articles
381:Hello, Jerry the Bellybutton Elf, and
152:. You may like to take a look at the
148:, which is recorded on the article's
7:
987:There is currently a discussion at
807:not for use as a forum or chat room
500:– a guide on where to ask questions
428:the world's largest encyclopedia...
1129:. (Almost every admin other than
70:You may also want to complete the
14:
1090:is relevant to the second item. ―
813:for more information. Thank you.
144:The article has been assessed as
1344:
1208:
982:
835:
788:
678:
624:
618:
388:
276:
59:How to create your first article
1266:. I recommend that you use the
78:to ask questions or seek help.
1619:the CheckUser who checked you
104:ask for help on your talk page
1:
1224:You have been sanctioned for
1054:certainly isn't encyclopedic.
689:Did You Know nominations page
605:Please sign your messages on
583:– Knowledge's hub of activity
571:– a guide on how you can help
271:Discretionary sanctions alert
45:The five pillars of Knowledge
1298:lashing out at other editors
1632:08:20, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
1606:05:14, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
1564:04:44, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
1512:02:33, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
1426:, who declined the request.
1407:14:20, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
1332:19:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
1286:19:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
1235:under the authority of the
655:Jerry the Bellybutton Elf,
420:New contributors' help page
1651:
1380:may be reverted or deleted
1186:04:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
1162:03:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
1121:03:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
1106:03:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
1083:02:57, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
683:Hello! Your submission of
64:Simplified Manual of Style
1598:Jerry the Bellybutton Elf
1574:guide to appealing blocks
1552:guide to appealing blocks
1504:Jerry the Bellybutton Elf
1435:Jerry the Bellybutton Elf
1388:guide to appealing blocks
1228:behavior and POV pushing
1113:Jerry the Bellybutton Elf
1031:02:19, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
1023:Jerry the Bellybutton Elf
1015:21:53, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
1008:nuances of the community.
996:13:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
964:00:16, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
941:00:02, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
933:Jerry the Bellybutton Elf
927:23:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
904:23:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
896:Jerry the Bellybutton Elf
889:23:21, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
866:23:17, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
831:23:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
778:00:04, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
763:00:02, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
755:Jerry the Bellybutton Elf
748:15:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
724:14:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
702:00:47, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
669:13:50, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
568:Contributing to Knowledge
370:06:06, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
352:00:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
265:06:19, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
230:05:06, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
222:Jerry the Bellybutton Elf
216:11:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
202:11:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
113:03:18, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
40:Contributing to Knowledge
1601:
1507:
1396:|Your reason here ~~~~}}
1233:uninvolved administrator
1116:
1026:
936:
899:
758:
657:good luck, and have fun.
433:Finding your way around:
225:
188:leaving us some feedback
164:create articles yourself
1390:, then adding the text
1037:Fox News: Most Trusted?
803:policies and guidelines
694:your nomination's entry
460:The Knowledge Adventure
302:discretionary sanctions
211:. And btw great job! –
54:How to develop articles
1554:for more information.
1419:
1353:This account has been
1303:personalizing disputes
1222:
661:Pharaoh of the Wizards
533:The simplified ruleset
135:
1471:change block settings
1418:
1386:by first reading the
1368:, but using them for
1237:Arbitration Committee
513:Knowledge's 5 pillars
399:Welcome to Knowledge!
384:Welcome to Knowledge!
320:standards of behavior
298:Arbitration Committee
168:Articles for Creation
134:
120:Articles for creation
846:blocked from editing
449:Department directory
328:editing restrictions
316:purpose of Knowledge
118:Your submission at
95:Knowledge:Questions
81:Please remember to
72:Knowledge Adventure
1420:
1140:definition. And
595:Additional tips...
541:Guide to Knowledge
136:
50:How to edit a page
23:your contributions
1412:
1411:
1384:appeal this block
1329:
1283:
1059:American Politics
993:Black Kite (talk)
960:
923:
885:
862:
842:Talk:Donald Trump
827:
795:Talk:Donald Trump
745:
699:Narutolovehinata5
652:
651:
591:
590:
556:How you can help:
552:
551:
481:
480:
445:Table of contents
126:has been accepted
85:your messages on
1642:
1618:
1587:
1581:
1550:Please read the
1490:
1488:
1477:
1459:
1457:deleted contribs
1417:
1397:
1348:
1341:
1330:
1323:
1284:
1277:
1249:log of sanctions
1212:
1183:
1178:
1158:
1152:
1134:
1103:
1098:
1079:
1073:
986:
985:
961:
958:
954:
952:
924:
921:
917:
915:
886:
883:
879:
877:
863:
860:
856:
854:
839:
828:
825:
821:
819:
801:and the project
799:reliable sources
792:
739:
682:
628:
622:
600:
580:Community portal
561:
490:
438:
392:
387:
385:
348:
280:
248:
245:
190:
180:
106:
1650:
1649:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1612:
1593:
1585:
1579:
1578:, then use the
1567:
1515:
1478:
1468:
1454:
1437:
1430:blocking policy
1415:
1391:
1339:
1318:
1290:
1289:
1272:
1239:'s decision at
1226:WP:BATTLEGROUND
1213:
1205:
1200:
1181:
1172:
1156:
1150:
1142:Paper of record
1130:
1101:
1092:
1077:
1071:
1039:
1003:
983:
980:
956:
950:
948:
919:
913:
911:
881:
875:
873:
858:
852:
850:
823:
817:
815:
786:
711:
676:
671:
653:
592:
553:
482:
473:, our newspaper
393:
383:
380:
378:
346:
340:
339:
300:has authorised
281:
273:
258:DYK For Newbies
252:
251:
246:
242:
204:
176:
170:if you prefer.
128:
89:by typing four
68:
35:Getting started
19:
12:
11:
5:
1648:
1646:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1568:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1542:
1539:
1533:
1522:
1518:Decline reason
1499:
1495:Request reason
1492:
1413:
1410:
1409:
1349:
1338:
1335:
1315:
1314:
1304:
1299:
1253:banning policy
1214:
1207:
1206:
1204:
1201:
1199:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1168:
1164:
1138:Potter Stewart
1063:
1062:
1055:
1038:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1002:
999:
979:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
785:
782:
781:
780:
751:
750:
710:
705:
675:
672:
650:
649:
646:
645:
630:
598:
589:
588:
585:
584:
574:
573:
572:
559:
550:
549:
546:
545:
537:
529:
525:Article wizard
519:
518:
517:
509:
501:
488:
479:
478:
475:
474:
464:
454:
453:
452:
436:
424:
394:
379:
377:
374:
373:
372:
322:, or relevant
282:
275:
274:
272:
269:
268:
267:
250:
249:
239:
238:
237:
236:
193:
192:
183:
154:grading scheme
143:
129:
127:
116:
67:
66:
61:
56:
47:
42:
37:
27:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1647:
1633:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1616:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1594:
1592:
1591:
1584:
1577:
1575:
1566:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1543:
1540:
1537:
1536:
1534:
1532:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1521:
1519:
1514:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1498:
1496:
1491:
1486:
1482:
1476:
1472:
1467:
1463:
1458:
1453:
1449:
1448:global blocks
1445:
1444:active blocks
1441:
1436:
1431:
1427:
1425:
1424:administrator
1408:
1405:
1401:
1395:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1372:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1358:
1356:
1350:
1347:
1343:
1342:
1336:
1334:
1333:
1327:
1322:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1302:
1300:
1297:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1288:
1287:
1281:
1276:
1269:
1265:
1260:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1229:
1227:
1221:
1217:
1211:
1202:
1197:
1187:
1184:
1179:
1177:
1176:
1165:
1163:
1159:
1153:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1133:
1128:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1104:
1099:
1097:
1096:
1089:
1088:WP:POVFIGHTER
1086:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1074:
1068:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1053:
1050:
1047:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1013:
1009:
1000:
998:
997:
994:
990:
977:
965:
962:
959:
953:
944:
943:
942:
938:
934:
930:
929:
928:
925:
922:
916:
907:
906:
905:
901:
897:
892:
891:
890:
887:
884:
878:
870:
869:
868:
867:
864:
861:
855:
847:
844:, you may be
843:
838:
833:
832:
829:
826:
820:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
791:
783:
779:
775:
771:
767:
766:
765:
764:
760:
756:
749:
746:
744:
743:
736:
732:
728:
727:
726:
725:
721:
717:
709:
706:
704:
703:
700:
696:
695:
690:
686:
681:
670:
666:
662:
659:
658:
648:
643:
642:
641:
635:
631:
627:
621:
616:
612:
608:
604:
603:
602:
601:
597:
596:
587:
582:
581:
577:
576:
575:
570:
569:
565:
564:
563:
562:
558:
557:
548:
543:
542:
538:
535:
534:
530:
527:
526:
522:
521:
520:
515:
514:
510:
507:
506:
502:
499:
498:
494:
493:
492:
491:
487:
486:
477:
472:
471:
470:
465:
462:
461:
457:
456:
455:
451:
450:
446:
442:
441:
440:
439:
435:
434:
430:
429:
423:
421:
417:
412:
410:
406:
402:
401:
400:
391:
386:
375:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
355:
354:
353:
350:
349:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
307:
303:
299:
294:
293:
289:
287:
279:
270:
266:
263:
259:
254:
253:
244:
241:
234:
233:
232:
231:
227:
223:
218:
217:
214:
210:
203:
200:
196:
189:
184:
181:
179:
173:
172:
171:
169:
165:
161:
155:
151:
147:
142:
140:
133:
125:
121:
115:
114:
110:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
79:
77:
73:
65:
62:
60:
57:
55:
51:
48:
46:
43:
41:
38:
36:
32:
29:
28:
26:
24:
16:
1589:
1571:
1569:
1556:TonyBallioni
1549:
1530:
1523:
1517:
1516:
1500:
1494:
1493:
1466:creation log
1433:
1421:
1375:
1371:illegitimate
1370:
1357:indefinitely
1352:
1351:
1316:
1291:
1261:
1230:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1174:
1173:
1146:power~enwiki
1127:Donald Trump
1094:
1093:
1067:power~enwiki
1040:
1007:
1004:
981:
947:
910:
872:
849:
834:
814:
787:
752:
741:
740:
738:
731:BullRangifer
729:Exactly. --
712:
692:
677:
656:
654:
647:
638:
637:
594:
593:
586:
578:
566:
555:
554:
547:
539:
531:
523:
511:
503:
495:
484:
483:
476:
469:The Signpost
467:
466:
458:
443:
432:
431:
425:
416:my talk page
413:
409:Introduction
397:
396:
395:
363:my talk page
344:
341:
295:
291:
290:
285:
283:
243:
219:
205:
194:
175:
157:
145:
137:
99:my talk page
97:, ask me on
80:
69:
31:Introduction
20:
1623:, for you.
1362:sock puppet
1337:August 2018
805:; they are
644:is for you.
146:Start-Class
1462:filter log
951:Acroterion
914:Acroterion
876:Acroterion
853:Acroterion
818:Acroterion
770:PackMecEng
716:PackMecEng
609:with four
607:talk pages
505:Cheatsheet
485:Need help?
312:uninvolved
87:talk pages
1572:read the
1481:checkuser
1440:block log
1198:Topic ban
784:July 2018
634:mainspace
615:signature
497:Questions
247:like this
178:help desk
160:Knowledge
150:talk page
1625:Bishonen
1452:contribs
1400:Bishonen
1374:reasons
1308:(WP:OR)
1175:Mandruss
1132:MelanieN
1095:Mandruss
324:policies
109:Longhair
76:Teahouse
17:Welcome!
1583:unblock
1475:unblock
1398:below.
1394:unblock
1366:allowed
1355:blocked
1321:Awilley
1275:Awilley
1257:blocked
1001:Apology
687:at the
640:Sandbox
376:Welcome
1376:is not
1012:Lionel
957:(talk)
920:(talk)
882:(talk)
859:(talk)
824:(talk)
809:. See
742:PingMe
636:, the
611:tildes
367:Lionel
365::-) –
336:blocks
318:, our
262:Lionel
213:Lionel
199:Lionel
91:tildes
1576:first
1360:as a
334:, or
260:." –
101:, or
1629:talk
1621:here
1615:DoRD
1602:talk
1560:talk
1508:talk
1404:talk
1326:talk
1280:talk
1264:here
1117:talk
1027:talk
937:talk
900:talk
811:here
774:talk
759:talk
735:talk
720:talk
665:talk
405:stay
359:here
345:Neil
332:bans
306:here
296:The
226:talk
209:here
83:sign
52:and
33:and
1485:log
1432:).
978:ANI
848:.
623:or
286:not
1627:|
1604:)
1586:}}
1580:{{
1562:)
1531:or
1520::
1510:)
1497::
1479:•
1473:•
1469:•
1464:•
1460:•
1455:•
1450:•
1446:•
1442:•
1402:|
1392:{{
1160:)
1154:,
1119:)
1081:)
1075:,
1029:)
939:)
902:)
776:)
761:)
737:)
722:)
667:)
447:/
422:.
411:.
342:--
330:,
308:.
228:)
197:–
122::
111:\
1634:.
1617::
1613:@
1600:(
1558:(
1506:(
1489:)
1487:)
1483:(
1438:(
1328:)
1324:(
1319:~
1282:)
1278:(
1273:~
1182:☎
1157:ν
1151:π
1148:(
1115:(
1102:☎
1078:ν
1072:π
1069:(
1025:(
935:(
898:(
772:(
757:(
733:(
718:(
663:(
347:N
256:"
224:(
191:.
182:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
