User talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive 10

4806:"I consider all three of these to be different aspects of the same thing, ultimately. And at the moment, when I think about any examples of apparent tensions between the three, I think the right answer is to follow all three of them or else just leave it out of Knowledge (XXG). We know, with some certainty, that all three of these will mean that Knowledge (XXG) will have less content than otherwise, and in some cases will prevent the addition of true statements. For example, a brilliant scientist conceives of a new theory which happens to be true, but so far unpublished. We will not cover it, we will not let this scientist publish it in Knowledge (XXG). A loss, to be sure. But a much much bigger gain on average, since we are not qualified to evaluate such things, and we would otherwise be overwhelmed with abject nonsense from POV pushing lunatics. There is no simple a priori answer to every case, but good editorial judgment and the negotiation of reasonable people committed to quality is the best that humans have figured out so far. :) --Jimbo Wales 15:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)" 4377:"I consider all three of these to be different aspects of the same thing, ultimately. And at the moment, when I think about any examples of apparent tensions between the three, I think the right answer is to follow all three of them or else just leave it out of Knowledge (XXG). We know, with some certainty, that all three of these will mean that Knowledge (XXG) will have less content than otherwise, and in some cases will prevent the addition of true statements. For example, a brilliant scientist conceives of a new theory which happens to be true, but so far unpublished. We will not cover it, we will not let this scientist publish it in Knowledge (XXG). A loss, to be sure. But a much much bigger gain on average, since we are not qualified to evaluate such things, and we would otherwise be overwhelmed with abject nonsense from POV pushing lunatics. There is no simple a priori answer to every case, but good editorial judgment and the negotiation of reasonable people committed to quality is the best that humans have figured out so far. :) --Jimbo Wales 15:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)" 681:

anti-Perl because I think that in a couple of years they'll be a major shift away from Perl 5, to an even more difficult Perl 6 (or to other languages), and I'd rather learn Python 3 than Perl 6. In the Perl article, I was obviously anti-Perl in the Con section (which wasn't my idea to create). I think the quote I added was pretty even handed for a Con section, and was basically just something from a reliable source to back up what was asserted previously. Probably a more reliable source than anything else in the article, because it came from a formal study. One of my external links, to a critique by an author, teacher, and developer, was reverted for unspecified inaccuracies, and I didn't question it or put the link back. I'll go out of my way more to add appropriate anti-Perl material than pro-Perl material, but I've improved the article in more neutral ways too, which could only help Perl. -Barry- 22:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

1041:, is a fair-use image. Along comes some fortunate private citizen who managed to snap a great photo of Jewel. They upload the image to Knowledge (XXG), but want to insist that it not be used for commercial purposes (and let's say, they're not ignorant of our policies, but they're serious about the restriction). As this conflicts with the policy on use-with-permission, the image is deleted, and ends up not being used on Knowledge (XXG). Here's the trouble: it's "fair use" to use the old picture.. but that claim relies on the idea that there's no free alternative. Despite the lack of GFDL-compatible licensing, isn't the use-with-permission image a "free alternative"? As a flip-side, what if we are given permission to use one promotional image; we can add a fair use tag to that, but does that mean we shouldn't use any OTHER promotional images for the same person? (This is what made me think of this; see 3912:

integrity of. We have tried going through the Knowledge (XXG) system with him, as there is a RfC for him, and there have been numerous Mediations to him (In fact, one mediater said that he refuses to do mediation cases with wairthurhu because of his behavior), but they have not even made him think twice about his actions. He is basically an emotionless machine if there is anyway to describe him. he treats Knowledge (XXG) like it is a giant battlefield, and he can't seem to make a single edit without getting in a battle with someone. In the Wp automobiles talk page, he makes numerous comments attacking editers, and tries to make him look like a saint and us satan, even though it is basically the other way around. he has even gotten me so mad with his countless attacks that he has gotten me to violate

2423:" you have deleted the words " The background of this decision seems to have been the high costs of the silk ribbon of the Order of the Crown." and asked for a reference. I am a member of the Dutch Society of collectors of Orders and medals. We meet every few months in the " Het Loo " palace ( Rijksmuseum Paleis het Loo ) where we discuss current events with the director of the museum of the chancellary of Dutch orders of knighthood. The story about the costs came from him. He added that he was curious about the reaction of the wives of visiting presidents who could find themselves honoured with a small silver medal. To foreigners it may sound incredeble but the Dutch are a very thrifty nation! Is the reference good enough? 4457:, and I just wanted to drop you a quick note concerning en.wikibooks. I am currently working on 3 separate deals for the donations of e-books to the wikibooks project. Under the terms of these deals, the books would be completely released under the GFDL with no reservations, although some nominal mention of "Original Authors" may persist. Some users on wikibooks have mentioned that wikibooks is about the "creation" of new books, and not the consolidation of old books. However, many books on wikibooks, especially those in the core subjects, are lacking, and the donation of books in these core topics would help to boost our weaknesses in these areas. Currently, I am entertaining proposals to donate books from: 4011:, and I just wanted to drop you a quick note concerning en.wikibooks. I am currently working on 3 separate deals for the donations of e-books to the wikibooks project. Under the terms of these deals, the books would be completely released under the GFDL with no reservations, although some nominal mention of "Original Authors" may persist. Some users on wikibooks have mentioned that wikibooks is about the "creation" of new books, and not the consolidation of old books. However, many books on wikibooks, especially those in the core subjects, are lacking, and the donation of books in these core topics would help to boost our weaknesses in these areas. Currently, I am entertaining proposals to donate books from: 2222:

actually be useful to the article, and its not like the ones that I do take issue with offend my sensibilities or anything, but I really feel these images reflectly badly on the quality of the articles involved and on wikipedia as a whole. I would not normally engage you for this matter it is just that every time I remove one of these pictures, they seem to reappear almost immediatly due to the efforts of a dedicated group whose ostensible reasons for doing so do not seem entirely true. I would hate to judge a book by its cover, but probably the editor most dedicated to keeping the images is

2406:

have their own views. Then self evident truth becomes non-existent.Theory that truth is relative to a group. The truth or falsity of moral statements is relative to some individual or group, e.g. Administrators on wiki have their own policy. The the truth of moral or any statements is relative to individuals. Then it becomes the only criteria/system of administering, which in its underlying structure and sense could be wrong and was prooven wrong many times here..But then again, hmmm nobody will understand logic behind this statement anyways, ah well, it's vandalism, no doubt!

5245:. This is the biggest literary and publishing event of the country. We have plans to create a small distribution of Bangla wikipedia content, bundled with Ubuntu or other Linux liveCDs, and give them out to the people attending the fair. This is important as one of the biggest hurdles was to guide people in making the configuration changes in Windows XP to allow Bangla unicode rendering and Bangla typing. We plan to pre-configure everything in the Linux liveCD so that the users can just pop the CD onto their drives and get the Bangla wikipedia up and running. 1079:, each case is a case where it is pretty clear that free alternatives are not possible. Take as an example, an album cover... these are uniquely historically important for illustrating the album, and not replacable by a free alternative. An ordinary photo of a celebrity, though, is typically not unique in this sense. (A few might be.) There is a link there, unfortunately, to an excessively liberal page about publicity photos. That page declares itself, quite properly, to be non-policy, but I can see how it might confuse people.-- 3922:

abruptly interupt, attack us, and replace our comments with {{RPA}} tags, even it we didn't attack him. As one Admin summed it up "It will continue until Wiarthurhu ends up blocked indefantly or faced with the abritation comittee" and thats the 100% truth. he is acting like he is a holy warrier, waging war with Knowledge (XXG), and nothing but an indefinate block can stop him. I would really appreciate your help with this situation. You can even look at his edit history, which is filled with nothing but personal attacks and flaming.

899:

personally attacking people, and has been warned in excess of over 1 dozen times. He has humiliated other editors in front of hundreds of other people on over 150 different pages and has personally attacked over 200 users since he created an account. Recently, an RFA was filed against him, and the proof was in excess of 330 items long, but was quickly deleted without giving people time to vote. I need this user to be aprehended, and face the consequences of his actions. I would appreciate it if you would read about this case here

1886:(an admin), (many of which have left essays on their talk page).. Even though I am an administrator, at times I sympathize with these people and have considered leaving myself. Basically, SPUI has been dancing around the ArbCom limitations but has not broken the "letter of the law." The ArbCom case specifically says that he may not move pages to his parenthetical contribution. However, he has changed list articles to use his new convention, tagged pages not at his convention with 2547:. These notable articles were taken down because they were considered "mean," "rude," or "attacks." Encyclopedias are inanimate objects; they have no feelings or thought. We are only to get info on, write, and expand articles. This goes for any other article deleted for these stupid, biased reasons. Brian Peppers, The Tourettes Guy, and all articles like them should be put back up and stay up. Happy Birthday, Jimmy. I hope the Wikimedia foundation 4983: 33: 3842: 2087:. I did not tell the writers about this issue, and I did not ask anybody to post anything about this, but they found the information here at the Wiki by themselves and decided it's worth publishing. I think it just shows You how much us Jews are insulted by this userbox, and I believe You should also, as I would be insulted if I see a userbox saying "This user supports killing all Hispanos/immigrants/Arabs/homosexuals." I do not see 3377:. Aperently, the user used a sock puppet to vandalise the Main Page with the edit summary "going out with a bang". However, when going through both he and the suspected sock puppet's contributions, I used Crtl-F to search for the word "bang", and even going as far as 2,000 edits back, nothing came up. Maybe I just don't understand what was going on (in which case, please explain it for me), but this isn't making sense to me. 381:

deter/prevent some people from editing at Knowledge (XXG). No doubt it would, as would virtually any change which also prevented or reduced trolling, abuse, frivolous edits, vandalism and POV-pushing. My response is: "too bad." We are trying to build an encyclopaedia for readers, not an amusement centre for everyone in the world who has access to a computer. As I said somewhere above, Knowledge (XXG) doesn't

952:(some are recognized by the cities, and some cities do not choose to recognize others, but both have the same representation), and the smaller ones dont have these organized practices, and the larger ones with the community councils are usually large enough to stand on their own, (but should include the city they are apart of in the first sentence of the article). I think that would make both parties happy. 2749: 2619: 1456:

Danny and Brad are not accepting Graal's point-of-view on this matter for reasons which seem pretty obvious to the outside viewer, do not be slanted to accept the above statement over your experienced staff team who know all the facts. He has decided to come right to the top because all below you disagree with him, and I reccomend you seek Danny's and Brad's advice concerning what could be considered the

2398:

decide a beauty queen, but not justice. Beaty is a matter of taste, but justice is tasteless and sour. Right is STILL right if nobody is right and wrong is STILL wrong if everybody is wrong, at any time, at any place. The first poll in Christianity was wrong but so were many other polls. So, these should be the words by which wikipedia and their administrators should live by, THE GOLDEN RULE...

3795: 2798: 2668: 1484:

think this is a serious issue and this guy and perhaps some member of your team have really broken lot of wikipedia rules and i will say broken also lot of basic rules of human relationship. We have taken contact with journalist and we are in the process to publish it so everyone known about this story and how wikimedia have dealt with this.

5016: 307:

shift towards encouraging people to use their real names as much as possible and from there, it isn't a major issue to have them authenticated as Amazon does. Knowledge (XXG) would still be the collaboratively created encyclopedia -- it just wouldn't be the encyclopedia created by primarily by anonymous contributors. --

2165:- the danger when people start dismissing things as "Wikilawyering" is that this is when due process and the rule of law dies, two things that are essential for a community to succeed. "Lawyerly arguments" is the sort of nonsense that apparatchiks in a dictatorship throw out against people they're sending to the gulags. 1177:. I first learned about it a few months back when doing a school report. Now, I routinely use it as a primary source, instead of Google. I am an active editor, and look up stuff ranging from organic chemistry to Star Wars. Some of my friends would also like to thank you for all of the video game materials on it... =) 5299:)? Everything in it has been taken from books about the SPK such as Hitler's Children by Jillian Becker, or Televisionaries by Tom Vague. Its all based on sources and fact. Are you going to delete those books as well? All the information in it is verifiable and I dont understand why you would want to delete it. ~ 2459:

and the rooms of his probable lover Mister Keppel. How do I know this? A good friend who was involved in publishing the book told me. Will he publicly confirm the story? Oh never.. He is a civil servant. The Queen is well known for her ambition to controll everything concerning her family and ancestors.

4706:

There are also concerns that the concept of being paid to write articles itself is flawed, but that is another matter entirely (and he is at least making an effort to fall within Knowledge (XXG) policy and guidelines when it comes to articles). So, based on these new concerns, I'm asking if you could

4596:

Hello Jimbo. I saw that link (Local Meetup Schedule) and noticed that you are coming to Delhi on the 24th. From what I understood - does that mean that you will agree to a Delhi meetup if 5 people sign up? Actually there has been a long discussion on the Notice board for India-related topics. Can you

4277:

4167:

2405:

Inductively Strong Argument- The conclusion of an inductively strong argument is probably true if all its premises are true. But even if the middle sentence is true and the rest is wrong, the argument can still be considered true..But even that statement could be wrong if it is thrown to the dogs who

2388:

Big boss man, I'd recommend you get rid of few administrators here, you know the names, I suggest administrators go thru better screening process, many of them simply have no life, no b/f, no g/f and have nothing better to do but revert correct edits on wikipedia and address changes such as play into

1455:

Oh, and my two bob is as follows: Danny is dealing with case, and has been for a long time. The information above is one-sided, just the like article which is about to be deleted. If I thought it was worth my time, I would explain every one of the above points, but I don't feel it's worth it. Because

1414:

have banned all my company accounts saying we have made off wiki threads because someone reported to him that we have banned someone from GraalOnline because he was involve on this propaganda war. This is completly false and this player was banned 1 month before for Credit Card Fraud... This story is

747:

contribute to Knowledge (XXG) considering that at the highest level there are lies, double standards, disregard for whether good content was reverted, and better treatment for someone making numerous blatant personal attacks, ignoring consensus, and refusing to communicate, than for someone who calls

3902:

and got quickly deleted. This led to lots of attacks from him. Please note that he has already been editing aircraft related articles for a while by this point, and has made a long list of enemies who edited the corosponding articles. He has since caused many flame wars and has made enimies of every

3595:

Why did you have to go and ban CapnCrack. All he did was try his best, you can't hold that against him. And then to go and ban another 190 people just because they were his friends is just spiteful. Talk about rubbing salt into a wound. The Capn was down there in the trenches with all of us, working

3467:

Methods used to solve such issues need to be clearly identified as "has teeth" or "has no teeth", so that editors don't waste voluminous amounts of time going through pointless steps to attempt to reach a solution, only to find that the attempted resolution doesn't mean anything and can't propel the

3005:

I've learned that many editors know about this situation generally, since it was first described some weeks ago on another website. Instead of linking to that site, I'll summarize what I've gleaned from forum banter and my own email exchange with the the editor involved, inviting those more familiar

2990:

That I feel it is necessary to do this anonymously at all is indicative of what I see as the root of this very complaint: an administrator who has come to regard herself as exempt from the policies that maintain fairness and order here, and who has lately demonstrated a certain eagerness to exercise

2540:

As I understand it, you have deleted and locked the article on Brian Peppers, and refuse to put it back up without good reason. I'll give you very good reason to put it back up. What I'm about to say also applies to The Tourettes Guy. We are an encyclopedia. Are job is to record and give information

2458:

You are right but we will never get it published in the Netherlands... EVERYONE IS AFRAID OF THE QUEEN! Her Majesty even managed to surpress a floor-plan of the 17th. century Het Loo palace in a book commemorating King William III. ( 1650-1702) The map showed the stairs between the Kings appartement

2447:

which states "Information on Knowledge (XXG) must be reliable. Facts, viewpoints, theories, and arguments may only be included in articles if they have already been published by reliable and reputable sources". Its a shame wikipedia can't contain things that are true but unverifyable, but that's the

2397:

The majority is not always right! Majority is right in the field of the relative but not in the absolute and objective (crteria too). Majority is a legitimate test so long as voting is based on conscience and not on propaganda. Truth does not win when numbers alone become decisive. Numbers alone can

2254:

If you'd even looked at the image's description page, you'd have seen this text: "This photograph was taken by me using a Fuji FinePix 4700 digital camera on Jan 15 2000. The model is my wife (aged 29) and she has agreed to grant full rights to use the picture on the web. She is fully aware that the

1501:

Clever how you don't sign in when making edits which could get you banned. Is that the kind of deviancy we should be promoting around Knowledge (XXG)? I don't think so. And by the way, the only reason I came to this page in the first place was it was on my watchlist. Notice how I didn't actually see

951:

I think that this would solve a lot of issues, and you should add it to the rules and naming conventions because community naming rules are so vague that they are getting out of hand with the debates (communities within cities). Almost all the larger communities have community councils or coalitions

665:

confusion! Unless it's a coverup. Fred Bauder had been corrected on the workshop page and elsewhere about where the vandalism was, by more than just me, but in the proposed decision, he again only linked to what he calls a content dispute rather than the other paragraph that I warned Pudgenet about.

615:

I responded to two of the findings of fact above -- "Tendentious editing by Barry" and "Barry has made inappropriate accusations of vandalism." There are no supporting links or explanations in the proposed findings of fact under the tendentious editing claim, so above I just guessed at what it might

306:

I see. I did say in the article that I clearly believed that contributions can be made anonymously, and I gave some examples, but that currently there is an overuse of the protection offered by anonymity which in turn causes a lot of issues for project as a whole. Thus I would favor a philosophical

4432:

or something), that could be immediately cited in the edit summary for removing or reverting this spam without long discussions with each "new user" doing the spamming for those sites. We could also mention it in bold as a NoInclude warning in the related templates, so as to remove plausible denial

3986:

3911:

because of our young ages (even though we make rational edits to Knowledge (XXG) and both are respected editors, heck I have two barnstars!) and claims that we are "wreckless vandals" because we revert most of his edits, as they are either POV, or they do not belong in the article or compromise the

3472:

I do feel like I'm 'fighting city hall' here, as the little guy. My involvements with some admins have been overwhelmingly positive, but my involvements here seem like there is a very broken class system between editors and admins and it's extremely disheartening. I hope you don't take this as just

3097:

In my time as a wikipedian, I've grown to respect SlimVirgin's dedication but feel increasing concern over her fading sense of impartiality and even propriety. If what IPFrehley says is true, it represents a grave deception, violation of trust, abuse of power, and act of inexcusable cronyism on the

3093:

I would respond by noting that when all this happened, IPFrehley had yet to be banned. Also, IPFrehley openly admits to creating multiple socks specifically attempting to bring this situation to the community, which he apparently tried to do more than once though record of it is gone because he was

2268:

I really don't think it adds all that much to the article, quite the opposite in fact, I think it makes the article look kinda strange. It seems that a detailed illustration would have about equal educational value and would be far more appropriate for an encyclopedia. I suppose we could deline the

2139:

who has been indefinitely blocked for warnings on disruption (which he has followed through on). I am requesting your help because the email was extremely explicit and I really do not need this kind of drama from someone who used this analogy on the situation: "Sometimes, you can make a smug remark

1190:

The reason given is this: Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "RelentlessRogue". The reason given for RelentlessRogue's block is: "cool your jets and BE RESPECTFUL of other members." You may contact KryptoCleric or one of the other administrators to discuss the block. Note

821:

Yes, he did edit-war once or twice, but the only one where he made more than a couple of reverts was Wikipedians with articles — which is bad, and deserves a stern warning from the ArbCom and maybe even a one-revert restriction, but is irrelevant to a general ban from Perl, or from interacting with

5586:

I have been following your vision for WP for sometime.. and i feel that it is exactly right. i'm quite dismayed in seeing that you're constantly having to defend WP's reliability and accuracy, also a lot of wikifolk are talking about efforts to raise the quality of articles. I am all for that, but

5232:

to give Bengali speakers a quick intro to Knowledge (XXG). Bangladesh Open Source Network is actively promoting wikipedia back in Bangladesh, and plan to distribute leaflets and small booklets with the tutorial and other information about Knowledge (XXG). A n informal workshop for newbies will be

3916:

when responding him some times, which is something I just about never do. I have since overcome that though, as I know yelling at him is getting him nowhere. But, he has defantly crossed the line now, because he HAS MADE HIMSELF A WIKICOP, and is issuing citations to everybody he dislikes. (I know

3063:

IPFrehley says he didn't believe SlimVirgin was really interested in the evidence he was sending, so he did something a little diabolical: in the document he emailed SlimVirgin, he hid something that would alert him when it was opened (I don't get that tech stuff so don't ask me more about it), to

2438:

P.S. I have asked the heraldic sculptor of the British court if i could use the pictures on his website in Knowledge (XXG) articles. He was delighted! I have to mention the name or he artist offcourse. Soon the beautifull carved crests in Saint George's chapel in Windsor , St. Giles' cathedral and

2134:

repeatedly, even when I had placed a simple question to ask for him (civilly) there, as well. When the information was shown to be unsourced (and after several blocks on IPs he used to evade his block), and even after I apologized, he continued to attack me on my talk page, and even on my recently

1483:

Jim, i think you will appreciate how this guy is tracking all my writting and coming after me. He is so confortable with what i am saying that he need to come after me and explain to others what they need to do or think about this issue. Look really close to this issue because me and lot of others

367:

Requiring registration remains a significant barrier to entry for many valued contributors. Lots of us started out by contributing a few times under an IP before deciding we liked being involved enough to register a username. Without the ability to edit without logging in, how many potential new

4477:

The first project listed is a UN project that maintains a number of ebooks that discuss topics of primary interest to developing coutnries. Partnering with that group would (in my opinion) be of some benefit to our project. I wanted to simply alert you of these projects, and ask if there are any

4031:

3044:

but thinks there were three or four total requests made. None of them replied to his email, though at least one forwarded it to either SlimVirgin or Mantanmoreland, which is how she managed to intercept and block IPFrehley so quickly when he finally decided to do it by himself (she must have been

1809:

Jimbo, I notice the following, regarding the election to the WP Board: "Candidates should be aware that Board positions are not paid and do not offer per diems; Trustees must be able to financially support their activities as a Trustee (including international travel) and must be able to devote a

1676:

This is a great idea. It might be embarassing for him to do so however when administrators won't even allow the "Wikiality" segement on Colbert's show to be written about on wikipedia. They've essentially kept it off the Colbert Report entry, arguing that it is "not notable". Seems like biased

805:

People need to look at the particular edits, edit summaries, frequency of my reversions, etc. to decide what I deserve. I mentioned Simetrical because he listed a bunch of my edits to make it easy for people to decide for themselves whether I deserve blame and what punishment I deserve. But since

580:

even though the arbitrators refuse to judge the large amount of content I added to the article that was deleted improperly, Pudgenet just gets a warning, and Scarpia gets nothing. Oh, and it's claimed that I made inappropriate accusations of vandalism. What a joke. I'm banning myself from further

575:

and its talk page. Particularly, whether there was really "tendentious editing by Barry." Pudgenet added what myself and at least two other Wikipedians consider vandalism, and I called it that and warned him for it. Scarpia reinserted it, and I considered that vandalism too. I mentioned Scarpia's

5352:

Is there some reason you can not support accountability for editors on Knowledge (XXG)? I can see no reason to keep Knowledge (XXG) from being sued if you do not have a way to make sure editors are responsible for their entries. Attempts to avoid responsibilty for entries by claiming anyone can

2221:

Please believe me when I say that I am not puritanical or anything but there are a number of images on any number of articles that can be said to relate to anything remotely sexual that really seem somewhat out of place or inappropriate. I don't really have a problem with similar images that can

1918:

In truth, I believe that SPUI has good knowledge and has the potential to be a valuable contributor. However, his manner of negotiation has driven people away from Knowledge (XXG). Complaining just gets you ignored. I do not believe that this is the Wiki way. I realize that you must be busy with

898:

Hello Mr. Wales, I had a concern about a case that was recently not accepted by the Arbitration Committee. I dont know why, but they were not given enough time to hear the case, and the case never had a 4 vote accept or reject following the policy. This user is a user that has a long history of

841:

A lot of the edits I made to Wikipedians with articles were to enforce what was agreed to when I took Pudgenet's objection to the talk page. (after I tried getting an administrator's advice and was ignored). And I think in the context of the quote, "at least..." means "if you have to ban him at

680:

I am anti-Perl, especially with regard to the Perl community. There are plenty of decent Perl folks, but there are far too many immature idiots that have been active members of various internet discussion venues for a long time, so bad as to drive several people away, including myself. I'm also

380:

Well done to Ben for at least trying to come up with a technically viable solution to Knowledge (XXG)'a fundamental problems, which are also being discussed at the level of principle further up the page. In reply to LtPowers, it is NOT a valid argument against such a change to say that it would

246:

Remember that if you have the user's real name stored, someone can subpoena it. If you start collecting names, they *will* get out the next time there's a messy divorce and the opposing side's lawyer subpoenas Knowledge (XXG)'s records to prove that a user is editing Satanism articles and must

4702:

This note would imply that MyWikiBiz is possibly a shared account, leading to further concerns over its use, considering the use of shared accounts, from what I've been told, is forbidden. As you were the one who allowed MyWikiBiz to continue with his work, I figured it would be appropriate to

4273:

1754:

Colbert also told teenagers that they could make a lot of money by using liquid nitrogen and hammers to breaks chains to steal bikes and they should bring sissors to stab people who tried to stop them. Humor and free speech are both under attack and Colbert is one of the good guys. Don't blame

3921:

article to pubically attack Knowledge (XXG). This has gotten him blocked for a week. That is why I come to you, as since he is blocked, we can have a rational discussion without him interupting. (Many editors have to resort to Email to talk about what do do about his actions, as he will often

326:

I'm 100% OK with requiring all users to register a username. Then we always know we are talking to the right person, and not to an IP adress that may be shared by several people. It would be helpful to the building of community. As to real names, there is a real problem with stalking that

2130:) was then reverted by Kevin Breiterstein and myself, and I left a message on the user's page not to remove information, even if it is questionable (the information was a quote from a British TV host who was making fun of rural America). This user then went on to slander me on the article's 3135:

You mentioned at Wikimania that you had problems always remembering to use an edit summary, and then I brought up that there was actually an option in the interface to force edit summary usage, but you hadn't run across it. So here's how to turn it on. Go into your preferences, click the

1559:

Have you read the talk page? The account is already blocked, and admins are trying to confirm whether or not it's actually Colbert. If it is, and he wants to petition to be unblocked, he can do so (though, celebrity or no, the account has done nothing but vandalize the site and violate

3083:

IPFrehley says he later emailed SlimVirgin asking if there was another explanation (other than what seemed obvious...that she was sending the information to Mantanmoreland) but she refused to answer, except for apparently announcing somewhere that IPFrehley was sending her threats.

1727:

I agree with the idea of you appearing on the show, Mr. Wales, although I was thinking that Colbert seemed to be intentionally damaging our Knowledge (XXG) and was wondering if there was some way you could pursue legal action. After all, he did tell people to vandalize the wiki on

1942:

Am I missing something here? If this is a disruptive user and you're an admin, why don't you block him, and, if he continues such behaviour, add increasingly longer blocks? Presumably he has no special exemption from good behaviour which other editors are expected to adhere to.

1351:

It appears that there is a good number of IP vandals that uses the service of Road Runner HoldCo LLC, a company that provides internet service to millions of customers on the Eastern Seaboard. Should someone do something about this in general, or should we just leave it be?

3079:

Looking over their contribution histories it's easy to see that Mantanmoreland and SlimVirgin often work in tandem. But that's no excuse for secretly passing him information sent to her in confidence and with the promise that it would be reviewed and judged appropriately.

4845:

I'm having a problem with my comlete layout of wikipedia, when I log in the background changes to yellow and the text is in Times new roman and the format is completly changed, what is going on here? Could you direct me to anyone that could help? Please answer, thanks --

3031:

After uploading the image but before he could do whatever he was going to do next, IPFrehley was blocked by SlimVirgin and the image deleted (but not until after she apparently let Mantanmoreland have a copy, since he does refer to it on some thread I can't find now).

2091:

for this provocative userbox to stay. Somebody saying in his userpage he supports the party which killed 6 million Jews and 5 million people just because they belong to other cultures and religions just 60 years ago, should simply not be at a Knowledge (XXG). Regards,

1036:

I think there might be a problem for the project with WP:CSD I3. My understanding is, this policy comes straight from you, so I wanted to bring this up. Here's a hypothetical. Let's suppose that for some reason, the only image currently available for use on, say,

594:

Um, ArbCom does consider content issues when they arise from a behavior dispute. They have to; otherwise how would they be able to know what to do when one side claims the other side's references don't support their insertions? The principle is that ArbCom doesn't

2065:. They're now voting on deleting it, and it seems like no consensus will be reached and the template will stay in its place. I hope you can see what's very wrong with this template, and attempt to force them remove it for the good faith of Knowledge (XXG). Thanks, 123:. So, I'm writing to you in order to plead with you, as the head of the Wikimedia Foundation, to be mindful of how many articles Knowledge (XXG) sends down those tubes, every single day, so, other important internets can get through. Just a week ago, I was editing 3098:

part of SlimVirgin. I'm requesting that her administrative powers be suspended while evidence related to this and other alleged abuses be presented and reviewed by a panel other than the Arbitration Committee, which I do not feel can be impartial in this case. --

2826:

It said make a birthday wish for Jimbo. I wish that at each April Fools day, wikipedia and uncyclopedia switch domains just for that one day. Oh and Brian Peppers comes back that day, too, but is protected and has one link: to a YTMND search for Brian Peppers.

2696:

2932:

Just noticed that Article IV, Section 3 of Knowledge (XXG) Foundation Inc.'s bylaws do permit payment for expenses to trustees by resolution of the Board. So the statement that they must always pay for their own travel etc. is somewhat misleading. Best regards.

576:

vandalism on the Wikipedians with articles page because it fit the stated purpose of the page, and went to the talk page to get consensus for an acceptable version when Pudgenet deleted it. Pudgenet deleted the version agreed on too. Now I'm getting banned from

909:

I found the evidence pretty unpersuasive, but this is not up to me. There is a huge list of links to thinks Coolcaesar has allegedly done wrong, but generally speaking most of them are quite mild if wrong at all. (I randomly spot checked about 10 things).

748:

vandalism vandalism and reverts himself when concensus says he shouldn't call vandalism vandalism. And how could you tell me Knowledge (XXG) might benefit from me not editing Perl without you even judging my content? You'll probably be an arbitrator some day.

3429:) violate not only the rules as set forth in policy, but the spirit of them. Further, followup questioning on these actions has shown me a profoundly disfunctional class system between editors and admins and I believe this is a problem that must be solved. 3309:

and there are sufficient sources to provide evidence of notability, and the article has survived two discussions of whether it should be deleted - which means that the community has reached concensus that the article should be included in the encyclopedia.

2978:

Jimbo, I've just posted this on AN/I, but I've watched as similar information has been quickly deleted by the subject recently, and don't suspect she'll do the same on your talk page, so I post it here as well to be sure you're made aware. Thanks and take

261:

I'm not sure being caught for editing an article on Satanism is as damning as you think unless that person was stating their own support for it. And if they stated their support for Satanism and get "exposed" -- so what? One has only exposed the truth.

5597:

Editing Knowledge (XXG) isn't a RIGHT. Just look at anyone who has been blocked or banned. Editing Knowledge (XXG) is a priviledge and quality is more important than priviledges extended to some people with questionable morals and abusive intentions.

4925:

The way I understand the situation is that although the foundation owns the name "Knowledge (XXG)" and the servers that Knowledge (XXG) is using, it does not "govern" Knowledge (XXG) as it is neither the owner nor the editor of the content of Knowledge

4731: 4302: 508: 4662:

so obviously crosses the line of 'defamation' and 'libel', that you're likely to be sued for it in the near future. You're responsible for the content that goes on your project here, and I'd suggest you demonstrate an awareness of that responsibility.

4233:

2389:

played as vandalism... I would like to remind everybody that majority could be wrong... it took them forever to put footnote under Chopin's birthday, they did not put it because majority of administrators did not agree... So I repeat the following...

4399:

Regularly, ads icons are inserted in front of external links, that make it look like Knowledge (XXG) treats them special, promoting or endorsing those sites. This gets worse now with the templates used for external links to IMDb, MusicBrainz, etc.

3953:

3548:

This user has claimed that you wanted him to be unblocked but were having technical problems doing so, and has asked for other admins to do it. If that's the case I'd be glad to unblock for you... but the story sounds a bit implausible, frankly.

2485:, to verify the claims made for the organization in the article here. Based on that, and what Lucas reports on the talk page, I have tagged the article as a hoax and nominated it for deletion as we cannot allow Knowledge (XXG) to be used this way. 1906:

in favor of his own, and more of the same. (Just now I discovered that he allegedly created a coyvio, haven't looked at it yet). It is futile to reverse any of this because he will simply revert and bring an edit war. About a dozen or so posts to

2892:

and having to mess with my pictures - scanning, photoshoping out dust, etc - was the final straw. So, i've decided to ask you to help me get a digital back for my hasselblad so that I can once again afford to use that system. Life is good.

1373:, a good proportion of actual people on vandalism patrol probably would have reverted that too, as it was a totally unexplained blanking. I would wager that at least 99% of page blankings are performed in bad faith and should be reverted. -- 482:

to clarify the policy. It is difficult to make progress with these things when the discussion gets overrun with users who think plastering pages with dozens of screenshots a logos isn't a problem because we probably won't get sued! Thanks,

1127:

Yeah, it's a good picture. Part of the problem these days is that people are so used to glossy, didgitaly enhanced professional photos of celebreties in full makeup that they consider a candid photo to be "disparadging" to the subject...

4657:

Jimbo, please take a break from patting yourself on the back and look around. Knowledge (XXG) is being used to push propaganda and offensive hate rhetoric. I'll leave you to do your own homework and find out what I mean. The article on

4228:

5023:

Does the Great Jimbo ever answer our rambiling, pointless, insignificant and contradictory posts? Not that I can see. Perhaps he has a life outside of Knowledge (XXG) (unlike us). Does he even read them? If so why does he not answer?

475:

My own view, which is at the extreme end of the spectrum I know, and therefore not (yet) formal policy in every case, is that we ought to have almost no fair use, outside of a very narrow class of images that are of unique historical

1737:

Um, so? Are they anything more than simple reporting of its coinage? Do they discuss the ramifications of the word's invention? Of its meaning? Of its import? And if they do, is the analysis sourced or is it original research?

1327:

wanting my password on Knowledge (XXG) earlier today. I replied back to ask for it in private for fear of using it as vandalism. All I want to is contribute and not be the victim of vandalism or may named impugned in any bad light.

992:

conference. Some folks in Denmark are arranging a wikimeetup in conjunction (1 or 2 sept in Dragör) with this conference and are hoping that you can attend to that meetup too. I was just wondering if you will be able to attend that

1964:

Yes, some admin (usually the same ones) come to SPUI's rescue. Then you go and reblock and someone unblocks him. And then at the last ArbCom someone accused me of having a conflict of interest (although SPUI was clearly violating

1813:

In my view, Board members should be reimbursed for their receipted travel expenses and related meal expenses. Otherwise, you're severely limiting who can legitimately participate in the elections, resulting in a form of elitism.

1821:

requiring financial assistance from friends etc. to attend a recent Knowledge (XXG) event, so I'm somewhat surprised that she's seeking a spot on the Board under the present rules -- rules that I think are unfortunately flawed.

5587:

most of their proposals would result in making WP less open and more exclusive.. i'm pretty sure that you would be against such proposals... anyway good luck and please don't let WPs openness be sacrificed for higher quality.

1952:

Oh, the wheel wars that has started. In the past, SPUI has been unblocked very quickly after being blocked by various admins. The current one might actually hold, though, as it's for probabtion violation. Time will tell.

1207:

Could you explain this to me? My user account on HaloWiki is RelentlessRogue. My user account on Knowledge (XXG) is RelentlessRouge. Why is my account on the Wikia being blocked if my IP address was recently used by myself?

1180:

However, I have encountered a problem on the wikia known as HaloWiki. I just created an account today, and after about 2 hours, when trying to reply a user's message to me on their talk page, recieved the following message:

928:

page. I was involved in one of them, and it got heated, for there was not rule for the naming issue, and it really needs to be corrected, because I notice it is an increasing problem within the encyclopedia. I propose this:

1247:

This... isn't really the place for this, and I'm not Jimbo, but I think you got that autoblock message because you forgot to login, thus you attempted to edit from your IP address - your account RelentlessRogue was blocked

3035:

Based on comments IPFrehley made in another setting, it seems that prior to this, he reached out to a few admins, explaining what he wanted to do and asking for advice. He said the only ones he specifically remembers were

4573:(I honestly have no better word or series of words), if you say that you do not believe that an article on the SWGEmu in it's current form is appropriate for the Knowledge (XXG), then I will rest my case and let it rest. 4144:(I honestly have no better word or series of words), if you say that you do not believe that an article on the SWGEmu in it's current form is appropriate for the Knowledge (XXG), then I will rest my case and let it rest. 3176:

I'm curious as to why you would assume that? There are a team of skilled developers making this software - Jimbo can't know about every feature. It looks to me like Cyde had a good suggestion and Jimbo appreciated it.

2469: 1764:

Now that Colbert AGAIN mentioned Knowledge (XXG), I think it would be very appropriate to go on the show. Just an opinion. (and don't forget, they are probably trolling the site as we speak, as we found out tonight)

1191:

that you may not use the "e-mail this user" feature unless you have a valid e-mail address registered in your user preferences. Your IP address is 72.76.89.114. Please include this address in any queries you make.

4939:" or something similar? Or did I miss anything? I think I would not be the sole person that would be interested by a clarification on the subject. As your answer may be of interest for others, I would copy it to 3907:. He starts numerous flame wars, attacks everybody (and I mean everybody) who doesn't agree with him or endorse his edits, and has violated moe Knowledge (XXG) guidelines than I can count. he also attacks me and 3473:

some editor complaining about a single poorly-handled block, because it's more than that. The system appears to be broken there doesn't seem to be a way for people on the broken side (regular editors) to fix it.

666:

What is that...does Fred not like me and he's using something he learned in law school to mislead people? The discussion page is long, and it's possible he was successful if the other arbitrators didn't read it.

661:, I clearly linked to the paragraph with the in-article vandalism in which Pudgenet mentioned me. I went out of my way to be specific in my warning because the template didn't allow for specificity, and there's 5609:

Knowledge (XXG) is evolving in the direction of being MORE open to encyclopedic contributions and LESS open to unencyclopedic contributions and we are characterizing this as Knowledge (XXG) becoming MORE open.

2515:

Good grief. I know this will sound harsh, but I think you should perhaps consider finding another hobby if you think "I thought I heard that..." is a valid basis for inclusion of a claim in an encyclopedia!--

5196:, and have been active in editing and promoting it via news medai (both in and out of Bangladesh) since early this year. I just wanted to give you a quick update on the status of Bengali wikipedia as of now: 3810:

The international boundary shown is the border claimed by the People's Republic of China. Compare the territories of the historical Han dynasty and the territories over which the modern Chinese state claims

901:] which is his arbitration page that I resotred so you can view it. You will see how much action is really needed in this case. I will be checking on your talk page for a response periodically. Thank You -- 2029:

Renamed pages or attempted to, preferring his own naming convention despite no attempt being made to discuss it or come to a conclusion on what should be done. Basically, taking matters into his own hands.

1252:) for only 1 day, so you can just wait 24 hours and then continue to edit on that Wiki. I personally think the block was unwarranted, but you could discuss that with KryptoCleric after the block expires. 3835: 572: 1434:

I think you are the only one to be able to calm everyone down; this is really the credibility of your foundation that is involved in this story. This is a little bit simple to call me crazy Frenchman (

2140:

to someone in a grocery store and then ten minutes later you're unlocking your car door and BLAM... your brains are everywhere..." All of the IPs Repmart has used in the past two days are listed at

2135:

created RFA nom (that had to be sprotected from his, and other's edits). He has left messages stating "it is quest to ruin RFA" and I recently received a Knowledge (XXG) email from the true user,

5055:

messages. Can you imagine how many people are trying to get his ear? There are also many people who seem to answer questions for him on this page. If you listen to one of his talks (linked from

2126:

Through RC Patrolling, I reverted an edit by a user who appeared to be Wikistalking another (all of the new user's edits were reverting the edits of another user based off of one edit). This user (

1825:

A change in the rules (and a reasonable one in my opinion) would eliminate this perceived problem. How would I go about getting such a change on the Board's agenda? I have left the same message on

2210:

This was a pretty bad article. Let's build it again from scratch. REAL REFERENCES ONLY please, no digging up random accusations from web forums and so on.--Jimbo Wales 21:30, 8 June 2006 (UTC)"

2141: 2010: 2987:, this account was created today for the sole purpose of making the present complaint and obviously has not, nor will it ever, interface with my main account. Sockpuppet? Yes. Abusive? No. 2360:

Hi my name is Ahmad Najib Biabani Ibrahimkhel which corresponds to my username: احمد-نجيب-بياباني-ابراهيمخېل i am one of the sysop of Pashto wikipedia, now i would like to be the sysop of

920:

Plus, just one more comment. Some rule needs to be added for the naming of communities in the United States. I see that there have been several heated debates over the issue, like on the

602:

Plus, in your appeal above I think you left out some important details. An appeal isn't likely to be considered unless it responds to each finding of fact in the record. (IANAwikiL)

2502:

I thought that I had heard that you were Roman Catholic, so I added you to the category. If this isn't the case, I apologize, and will remove it for you. Thanks for letting me know.--

4627:

Hi Jimmy, sorry to bother you, but you have spoken on this issue previously on the Knowledge (XXG) mail list. If you have time, would you be willing to review the policy proposal at

4598: 4198:

Hi Jimmy, sorry to bother you, but you have spoken on this issue previously on the Knowledge (XXG) mail list. If you have time, would you be willing to review the policy proposal at

4169: 3090:

I suspect SlimVirgin will argue that because IPFrehley has since been indef banned and even spawned some socks of his own since this episode that his claims should be disregarded.

2333: 274: 2324:

I believe that you are the owner of wikipedia no. I have understood that your you can clear an administrator of its functions, then this user I want that you see what puts:

4904:

Dang ! Apparently it is not you but an impostor who created the account o_O Anyway, the question remains valid, I will just paste it here, as the page in fr:WP was deleted.

3108: 2162: 784:

also said "I don't think -Barry- is free of guilt." Finally, although he thought the full punishment was overly harsh, he certainly thought the punishment should be to "at

189:. Deletion debates appear to have no consensus. I think that your opinion on this matter would clear this up and stop the revert war, as you are the subject of the essay. -- 1843:

I am coming to you because I am not sure what else to do. Here we have users-- valuable users-- who are being driven away from Knowledge (XXG) or from the highways area by

3398:

He deleted the page with the edit summary going out with a bang, not edited it. The deletion would not show up in the history, but in the deletion history. Here is a link

4406: 3960: 3464:

The rules on "excessive personal insults" need to be spelled out more clearly to avoid disingenuous and over-reaching actions by admins claiming that they were insulted.

3002:

appears to have abused her position for the benefit of one editor and the detriment of another, violating her ethical responsibilities to this community in the process.

2213:

Knowledge (XXG) should be about facts, not personal vendettas. The Sveasoft entry is now a tug-of-war by the same folks that sparked the above comment and article wipe.

1604:

Indeed, the block was done to verify it actually is Colbert himself. Anyone could have created an account with that username, and if we get reasonable evidence that it

3503:

I think it's personal attacks, not insults. A tip here is not say they did something wrong or made the wrong choice because they will claim it is a personal attack.

2274: 2245: 1915:

have been ignored or brought little change. This ... problem is slowly creeping up across the United States road area and is beginning to move to international roads.

700:

revert war has been documented by an observer (Simetrical) on the talk page mentioned above, and I don't think there's anything there deserving of much, if any, blame.

5225:

has covered our early progress on May 2, when they broadcast a 5 minute interview with me on the purpose and progress of Bangla wikipedia, and wikipedia as a whole.

780:"acted with undue aggression on a number of occasions, and made unnecessarily provocative edit summaries and statements," and that he "did edit-war once or twice." 686:

then got into a nasty insulting revert war over perl articles. May I suggest you and wikipedia might both benefit more from efforts on your part in Python articles?

3025:

At one point he uploaded a graphic of some sort which he intended to use as a “visual aid” when making his “case” (he clearly had no idea what the hell he was doing

4563: 4134: 2910: 368:

Wikipedians will we lose? I'm not willing to risk it in exchange for a little less vandalism (there are plenty of vandals with registered usernames, after all).

2349:

Themindset is reverting from actual quotes out of the source material to biased NPOV violating rhetoric which is not contained in the text of the source article.

1542:. This is a decision I reccomend you or another foundation member make, as I would imagine it may come up outside of Knowledge (XXG) (in the press, elsewhere?) -- 5542:. Du weist, es gilt "Nimm nicht an Abstimmungen teil", aber ich würde mich sehr freuen, wenn es Deine Aufmerksamkeit fände ... Deutsche sind so Obrigkeitshörig! 1435: 1428: 3759: 3851:

Request for some comments on the issue (and on the image talk page) as the concerns of POV maps are not taken care of seriously in Knowledge (XXG). Regards,

3692: 5543: 5371:

Perhaps I chose the wrong word. Perhaps it would be better to say "require" accountability. As long as people can edit anonymously there will be a problem.

2334:

http://es.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Votaciones/2006/Sobre_el_n%C3%BAmero_m%C3%ADnimo_de_ediciones_necesarias_para_tener_derecho_a_voto#Propuesta_7_.28angus.29

5538:

Hallo Jimbo, in der deutschsprachigen WP haben wir ein großes Problem: * und †! Es findet wieder mal ein Meinungsbild zum Thema statt - das ganze ist eher

4635:

that any such policy would be overturned if approved at the Foundation level, as certain admins are too important to the project. Thank you for your time.

4206:

that any such policy would be overturned if approved at the Foundation level, as certain admins are too important to the project. Thank you for your time.

2270: 2241: 5178:

Hi Jimbo, I missed out visiting the Wikimania (couldn't afford to fly from Champaign, IL ... :( ), but I followed your speech. You mentioned there that:

1631:

View the skit again. He modified the Oregon part of the entry, as he intended to. Although I dunno if his staff knew it would be turned around so quick --

3291: 3452:

An acknowledgement by the other (Rfc-capable) admin that the editor may have suffered for the actions of previous users, not necessarily his own actions

479: 301: 4940: 2305:

angry. Is there anything you could do about stopping this vandal? Please reply to me on my talk page if anything new about this incident is going on.--

5219:

The progress is very promising, considering we had only about 550 articles back in March 30, 2006. We've added 4,000 articles in the last 4.5 months.

4478:

issues/concerns/questions that i should be made aware with, before we settle, and transfer material to the wikibooks server. Please let me know on my

4032:

issues/concerns/questions that i should be made aware with, before we settle, and transfer material to the wikibooks server. Please let me know on my

2002:- Here is where I discovered SPUI had literally lifted a lot of material and research for Knowledge (XXG) from my former web-site Ohio Valley Transit. 1991:

I would like to add a few comments about SPUI and the whole situation, and his lack of respect for authority, copyrights, or other people in general:

478:" - as a concerned member of this minority, and someone who gets a lot of abuse for trying to enforce the policy, I wonder if you could comment on an 2015:

Has gone in and added various cleanup tags to pages without initating a discussion or even mentioning it other than the fact that "he feels like it,"

1659:

Jimbo, perhaps you could communicate to the Colbert Report staff that you would like to go on the show to represent Knowledge (XXG)? Just an idea --

705:

I don't know Python. I created the Python 3 page by editing pre-existing, public domain material. I made good and fairly extensive contributions to

446:

Exactly. Some anonymous users do make contributions, but there is no good evidence that requiring them to register would scare (m)any of them off.

5233:

organized at a Bangladeshi University next week. We also plan to reach 10,000 total articles, and at least 1,000 full length articles by May 2007.

3932:

Wiarthurhu has already been blocked for a week, and should his pattern of editing completely that length may be increased or he may be brought to

1056:

16:06, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Unless the photo of Jewel is of unique historical importance, it is better to have no image than a "fair use" image. --

4809: 4380: 2481:

has a report about this organization as a possible front for a Russian disinformation/propagnda effort; focusing on the efforts of its reporter,

3345:

Thank you very much. The article is much improved in tone. I have excused myself from editing it any more since I am too emotionally involved.

5183:

I mean, that would be very exciting to go and meet someone who wants to work in... Bengali, a very important language where we do very poorly.

3461:

Admins, while understanding their busy-ness, need to be required to participate in processes and policy involved in questioning their actions.

1276:. I have requested that they be blacklisted at both the Spam Blacklist and the Administrator's noticeboard, but I seem to have been ignored.-- 933:

If a community within a city has a provable community coalition or council, whether recognized by the city government or not, it may be named

822:

anyone in particular. I don't think -Barry- is free of guilt, but I think the current proposed decision punishes him with undue severity — at

2005: 4866: 4610: 4181: 229: 5308: 1415:

now transformed in a private war between Daniel Bryant protected by some people on the wikimedia foundation. The goal is to now delete the

279: 3904: 2377:

Now if you could please help me with that i would be thankful to you. Or if you could provide me information on how i can apply for that?

3801:

Hi Jimbo! Following up on the discussion we had earlier on POV maps. The featured map in question is which potrays the modern borders as

1423:

because all reason given previously to delete the article were not conform with wikipedia rules. Please have a look at my personal page

859:"Userboxes are a very strong indicator that the person wearing them as badges of pride have no interest in, nor understanding of, NPOV." 625:

The inappropriate accusations of vandalism claim is more clear, and I partially addressed that above. It's discussed right at the top of

3898:. he first started stirring up controversy when he created the List of successful automobiles. The article was in massive violation of 2182:

Hey, just wondering how you ended up using the .flv files of Stephen Colbert. You were at WikiMania, right? (mboverload, from IRC =D) --

1696: 5472:, and I just wanted you to visit the page and see how I did. Feel free to make changes. Tell me what you feel on my User Page. Thanks! 5429:, and I just wanted you to visit the page and see how I did. Feel free to make changes. Tell me what you feel on my User Page. Thanks! 4891:

about your presentation and the status of the foundation. The question is valid for your english presentation page and others as well.

921: 540: 535: 5051:

I saw Jimmy at a meet-up today and at one point he casually mentioned that he's been working on his inbox which is now down to about

1089: 221: 5242: 3754: 3687: 3526: 3493: 385:

more editors right now, in fact it could do with a lot less. What it needs is better editors, better articles and better processes.

4810:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Neutral_point_of_view#According to Knowledge (XXG) founder Jimmy Wales, NPOV is "absolute and non-negotiable."

4381:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Neutral_point_of_view#According to Knowledge (XXG) founder Jimmy Wales, NPOV is "absolute and non-negotiable."

3399: 584:

And please make it clear in the proper places that ArbCom doesn't do content disputes, assuming that's true. It's true in my case.

4888: 2329: 874:

is another arbitrator who voted against me, and she has a userbox of sorts (under her standard userboxes) to show her support for

160: 3553: 2420: 1979: 1929: 1249: 1049: 726:. Do what you claim you would rather do. Learn a little, then contribute a little using the references you learned from. Repeat. 99: 91: 86: 5059:) he often mentions how he resists getting involved in the running of the wiki unless he sees his involvement as essential. -- 2922: 1771: 1665: 1637: 1594: 1548: 1502:

the comment until about a day after you made it? That was because I only come thru here every day or so. Give it up, Stephane.

74: 69: 61: 2759: 2629: 2269:

picture or something, but I think such an explicit photograph is really kinda disruptive for people who aren't expecting it.-

1707:

article. (FWIW, I also think it would be a good idea to go on the show and explain the 'pedia to them man, face to face.)

1093: 1014:

Hello. Once again I am employing this talk page as a platform to highlight proposed reforms to Knowledge (XXG). Please see,

1332:

has also dealt with this, but I wanted to let you know I am trying to do not wrong, just improve the Knowledge (XXG) site.

3894:

yes, this case has gotten so bad, that I have come to YOU for help with this guy. There is a user who goes by the name of

545: 169: 1420: 4502:

There has never in the annals of Knowledge (XXG) been a meetup in the geekiest region of the world. I'm shocked too.

4073:

There has never in the annals of Knowledge (XXG) been a meetup in the geekiest region of the world. I'm shocked too.

2186: 1510: 1468: 1173:

I first would like to congratulate and sincerely thank you for all the contributions you have made to the world through

4963: 2956: 2325: 1919:

running Wikimedia, but if you could please give your thoughts regarding the situation, that would be helpful. Regards,

1294:

Did you get in trouble when that old man saw that article that had been vandalised? and did you get sued by sollog? --

530: 311: 4693:

I appreciate your suggestion, Deathphoenix, but I am not sure that I would even properly execute what you suggested (

4405: 4264:

I appreciate your suggestion, Deathphoenix, but I am not sure that I would even properly execute what you suggested (

3959: 2026:, he did zero research (other than a "general Google search") to which I refuted with research that I have conducted, 3197:

It was a totally serious comment by Cyde. Among top wikipedians it is well known that I am a clueless editor. :) --

3102: 1324: 5228:

The number of people regularly editing Bangla wikipedia is around 12-15, spread all around the world. I've written

4505:

I see you are in town this week. I would like to arrange a meetup. Will you kindly grace us with your company?

4076:

I see you are in town this week. I would like to arrange a meetup. Will you kindly grace us with your company?

1879: 1295: 40: 3749: 3682: 2444: 1407: 5277:

if you want to take it further. I'm not associated with Knowledge (XXG) Signpost other than being a keen reader.-

1847:, even though he is under ArbCom sanctions-- actually, two of them. These users include, but are not limited to, 1236: 3917:

that nobody in their right mind would give him such privlages due to his disasterous edit history) and used the

5489: 5274: 1900: 1539: 1398:

page but your foundation is really becoming crazy just because a group of people have decided to vandalize the

525: 284: 5248:

Sorry for the long message, but I thought I'd update you on the current status of Bengali language wikipedia.

4429: 3983: 3400:

http://en.wiktionary.org/search/?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Wiktionary%3AMain+Page

1424: 418:

And how exactly do we find these better editors without scaring them off before they can even make an edit?

134:

to help clean up those tubes? I'm willing to donate $ 15 per hour the ladies spend in cleaning up the tubes.

5563:

Dear Mr. Wales, if I may ask you, could you take a look at my proposals on 2 Knowledge (XXG) policies WP:BLP

4881: 4425: 3979: 3672: 3322: 2023: 1711: 1572: 1092:, but I thought that it might be worth mentioning that the "not replacable by a free alternative" clause at 944: 4535:

I will be there. Would you be interested in a baseball game? I have A's tickets for Wednesday evening.

4106:

I will be there. Would you be interested in a baseball game? I have A's tickets for Wednesday evening.

3446: 3099: 2768:

Hehe i got the 1st spot :D it's the 7th here in Australia btw ;) Have a good one man, here's to 40 more! --

2638:

Hehe i got the 1st spot :D it's the 7th here in Australia btw ;) Have a good one man, here's to 40 more! --

1999: 1994: 1890: 1795: 1273: 1015: 5517: 4479: 4033: 3379:(If you aren't the right person to ask about this to, could you please tell me who that would be? Thanks.) 2773: 2643: 2255:

photograph is in the public domain and we release all rights." Of which part of that do you disapprove?

943:

If the community has no community council that can be found (and proven) then the community must be named

147: 5500: 4862: 3616:

It says that you made this, so I was wondering if you could help me. I'd like to know just a few things:

2777: 2647: 2503: 1612: 1277: 1224: 3848:

I'd also like you to compare it with the Indian version alongside where we've addressed all PoV claims.

3637: 3633: 3520: 3487: 3052:, because she told him to send his evidence to her via email so she could judge it privately and offline 2598: 1485: 1446: 225: 49: 17: 5547: 4437: 3991: 2339: 2298: 1856: 1565: 4707:

speak with MyWikiBiz further to clarify that its use will indeed fall entirely within policy. Thanks.

4278:

speak with MyWikiBiz further to clarify that its use will indeed fall entirely within policy. Thanks.

934: 4606: 4414: 4177: 3968: 3283: 3258: 3119: 2918:

It seems that the rules on Knowledge (XXG) are made by strongarm tactics rather than by any process.

2818: 2688: 2131: 2127: 2062: 2019: 1975: 1925: 1231: 1217: 925: 359: 291:

Some are later rescinded, but don't think it doesn't happen for the stupidest reasons imaginable. --

5494: 5483: 2878:. Since he seems to have talked to you about it at least in part, I thought it prudent to let know. 190: 5378: 5360: 5270: 4992: 4847: 4664: 4640: 4235: 4211: 3542: 3335: 3311: 3019: 2526: 2460: 2430: 2301:

has been getting serious recently. He has been intentionally posting false information just to get

1535: 1353: 1329: 437: 409: 349: 308: 297: 263: 233: 176: 5569:. I believe this will help some of the problems regarding biographical information. Thank you! -- 4628: 4199: 3144:. Hopefully within a month or two you'll have good enough edit summary usage to pass an Rfa :-P 2876: 2136: 5655: 5312: 5159: 5147: 5060: 4998: 4957: 4851: 3576: 3387: 3224: 3041: 1719: 1704: 1686:

Um, has anyone anywhere written anything about the term beyond simple reporting of its coinage?

1580: 1504: 1462: 1416: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1370: 5643: 4454: 4008: 3913: 3675:

because I messed up on the name and I changed it so that it is how I like it. Happy BirthDay...

3437:

An Rfc that quickly spiralled out of control, ending up with the blocking of an editor by Essjay

3367: 2854: 2724: 399:

in the site, which means an inceased possibility of higher quality, highly ambitious editors. —

4562:

was deleted for not being notable. I have made my arguments (and, as I regret, insults) in the

4133:

was deleted for not being notable. I have made my arguments (and, as I regret, insults) in the

2838: 2708: 2166: 2079:

Jimbo, two articles at two major Israeli news websites have been posted about this subject: at

1096:

is pretty much entirely ignored in practice. It is not clear to me how it might be enforced.

826:

ban him only from editing Perl-related articles and allow him to suggest changes on talk pages.

5510: 5278: 5238: 5102:

I while back (early May, I think?) I sent you this email to which I haven't yet seen a reply:

4778: 4349: 3857: 3821: 3346: 3326: 3275: 3250: 2960: 2144:

and a recent Checkuser was denied for this user, despite his extreme actions. Please help me.

2080: 1818: 1333: 1133: 957: 902: 432: 404: 344: 339:

I agree. Knowledge (XXG) has reached a point where IP editing is a liability, not an asset. —

248: 157: 142: 5266: 4762: 4333: 3087:

I've yet to verify that, but is sounds pretty typical of a pattern that's emerged over time.

3049: 2984: 1561: 5599: 5570: 5461: 5441: 5433: 5418: 5398: 5390: 5332: 5322: 5300: 4982: 4579: 4527: 4483: 4150: 4098: 4037: 3597: 3514: 3481: 3198: 3158: 2943: 2934: 2516: 2489: 2482: 2302: 2040: 1883: 1882:

in frustration and posting fake vandalism notices on his talk page to get himself blocked),

1860: 1830: 1119: 1080: 1057: 968: 911: 489: 199: 5077: 5039: 4770: 4341: 3933: 3899: 3834:

The image talk page has a discussion about Pov and so too when I had put it up for removal

2805: 2675: 1966: 1912: 1588:

That isn't what I said. I know it is blocked, some Admins want to make it a perma-block. --

1105:

Thanks, Jimbo, that makes sense. It also results in absurdities like the current image on

1029: 522:

Some people give barnstars for helping edit Knowledge (XXG). Here is one for making it. ;)

198:

Well, it is an attack page, and putting it in userspace looks like the right thing to do.--

5668: 5647: 5445: 5402: 4602: 4173: 3895: 3880: 3876: 3550: 3116: 2999: 2970: 2594: 2578: 2183: 1971: 1921: 1871: 1046: 892: 781: 765: 709:, and they should be put back as I requested in the arbitration case, or at least judged. 633:

warning that I gave to Pudgenet inappropriate, but a couple of editors agree with me that

603: 120: 4410:

Diff of the latest insertion of an icon ad in the template for MusicBrainz external links

3964:

Diff of the latest insertion of an icon ad in the template for MusicBrainz external links

3073: 2872: 2784: 2654: 1908: 1782:

I don't watch his show. Did he last night mention wikipedia again and what did he say?

985: 5626: 5614: 5602: 5591: 5573: 5550: 5524: 5503: 5448: 5405: 5383: 5365: 5325: 5315: 5281: 5255: 5162: 5150: 5083: 5063: 5045: 5002: 4952: 4898: 4873: 4855: 4835: 4816: 4796: 4787: 4749: 4713: 4667: 4644: 4614: 4583: 4545: 4530: 4518: 4486: 4440: 4387: 4367: 4358: 4320: 4284: 4238: 4215: 4185: 4154: 4116: 4101: 4089: 4060: 4040: 3994: 3942: 3926: 3862: 3841: 3764: 3697: 3659: 3640: 3600: 3581: 3560: 3530: 3507: 3497: 3408: 3392: 3349: 3340: 3329: 3316: 3253: 3229: 3201: 3184: 3171: 3161: 3152: 3121: 3064:

know if it even got looked at. He says that yes it was opened, not by SlimVirgin but by

2963: 2946: 2937: 2897: 2882: 2861: 2831: 2821: 2788: 2731: 2701: 2691: 2658: 2601: 2583: 2555: 2529: 2519: 2510: 2492: 2463: 2452: 2433: 2309: 2277: 2259: 2248: 2191: 2169: 2148: 2113: 2100: 2073: 2045: 1984: 1957: 1947: 1934: 1833: 1786: 1776: 1759: 1742: 1732: 1722: 1690: 1681: 1670: 1642: 1626: 1617: 1599: 1583: 1553: 1516: 1488: 1474: 1449: 1381: 1356: 1336: 1298: 1284: 1258: 1241: 1146: 1137: 1122: 1113: 1100: 1083: 1070: 1060: 1022: 1001: 971: 914: 882: 846: 792: 752: 730: 713: 690: 670: 657:"content dispute" (which included a personal attack -- see the edit summary), but in my 606: 588: 561: 493: 453: 441: 422: 413: 389: 372: 362: 353: 334: 293: 266: 251: 236: 202: 193: 5611: 5455: 5412: 5372: 5354: 5311:; they're talking about you there and attributing this deletion recommendation to you. 4813: 4708: 4684: 4677: 4636: 4384: 4279: 4255: 4248: 4207: 4056:. Is this for a conference or meetup? I'd love to attend one of those here someday. 3937: 3908: 3656: 3441: 3403: 3048:

When it did, SlimVirgin took advantage of IPFrehley's obvious lack of familiarity with

3015: 2919: 2894: 2552: 2449: 2108: 2095: 2068: 1766: 1756: 1678: 1660: 1632: 1589: 1543: 1369:

How is a bot to know if a blanking is in good faith or is simple vandalism? Regarding

1253: 1038: 860: 727: 687: 558: 429: 401: 386: 341: 4766: 4337: 3626:

How do you make certain words turn blue, and how do you know which ones to do this to?

3306: 2597:

vandalism? Do you think Mr. Colbert meant in good humor or just distaste? Thank you.--

1438:) , because I am defending my company, my reputation and our main product GraalOnline 863:

who voted against me on the Perl issues has a "This user is a Perl hacker" userbox on

5321:

I made no recommendation about this article. The anon ip number should be ignored.--

5273:

for their tentative schedule of reports from other Wikipedias, and post a message at

5073: 5035: 4949: 4895: 4870: 4793: 4784: 4746: 4364: 4355: 4317: 3923: 3652:

Two brackets on both sides of the name of an article that already exists in wikipedia

3571: 3382: 3219: 2983:

I am an active Wikipedian in good standing. Consistent with the letter and spirit of

2256: 1954: 1944: 1739: 1716: 1708: 1687: 1622:

I think it's an imposter because it did not vandalize any articles about elephants.

1577: 1569: 1143: 1110: 1067: 984:

I read in a bunch of places that you are traveling to Denmark on 1 september 2006 to

419: 369: 4780:

that the NPOV policy overides the Verifiability and No Original Research policies.

4471: 4424:

We really could use a specific, explicit point of policy against this (and a direct

4351:

that the NPOV policy overides the Verifiability and No Original Research policies.

4025: 3978:

We really could use a specific, explicit point of policy against this (and a direct

2566: 2163:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Blocking_User:HOTR_sockpuppets

5619: 5588: 4894:

I did post the question in french and english, so you won't need a translator :-)

4832: 4057: 3852: 3178: 2879: 2769: 2639: 2315: 2145: 2084: 1305: 1129: 1106: 879: 843: 789: 777: 769: 749: 710: 667: 585: 447: 328: 139:

PS1. Next time you're next to the Senator, feel free to smack him upside his head.

124: 5469: 5426: 5031:

They are like unaswered prayers. One day we may stop praying - and stop beliving.

2748: 2618: 1198: 1174: 4831:

Thank you for inventing a way for me to waste my time without wasting my time. --

3094:

summary banned and reverted and all diffs permanently deleted from the history.

2488:

Just letting you know in case there's anything you want to say or do about this.

1109:, but I understand that's an unfortunate consequence of the situation we're in. 5056: 4730: 4575: 4526:

on Friday, about campaigns.wikia.com. Exact time and place not yet settled...--

4301: 4146: 4097:

on Friday, about campaigns.wikia.com. Exact time and place not yet settled...--

3426: 3037: 2952: 2858: 2728: 2031: 1875: 1868: 1864: 1852: 1848: 1826: 1729: 1609: 1270: 1097: 507: 485: 184: 131: 116: 48:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5460:

Mr. Wales, I just wanted to inform you about the new page that I just created:

5417:

Mr. Wales, I just wanted to inform you about the new page that I just created:

5237:

There is a big book fair in Bangladesh in February each year, in observance of

3794: 3325:

her, I would guess because they think she posts too much to their Usenet group.

989: 5623: 5252: 3827: 3504: 3168: 2828: 2698: 2570: 2294: 2240:

does not originate on a website that specializes in educational photographs.-

1783: 1700: 1623: 998: 427:

They will be interested in improving an article/subject enough to register. —

5189: 3145: 2477: 1844: 1374: 1019: 938: 115:

Maybe you're read it on the news or seen it on TV, but according to Senator

3321:

The "community" that likes this article seem to be the individuals who are

2061:

In the Spanish Knowledge (XXG), they have a "This user is a nazi" userbox:

1402:

page helped by a mediator. Me and my company were attacked in the modified

967:

It looks like you are completely in the wrong on the Anaheim Hills issue.--

4054: 2054:

Your intervention in a very important issue at the Spanish Knowledge (XXG)

4933:

the founder and the chairman of the Wikimedia Foudation, the groups that

4914:

the founder and the chairman of the Wikimedia Foudation, the groups that

3714: 2306: 2234: 2227: 180: 5265:

That's an interesting report. If you're willing to expand it a bit, the

3620:

How do you make things go all black when you do the title of an article?

2797: 2667: 2238: 5465: 5422: 5115:

Remind me to invite you to a soon-to-exist new mailing list, "invite-l"

3816:

This is unfortunately a POV as it does not make a distinction between:

3436: 3295: 3279: 2541:

about notable, infamous, and famous things/events/people/places, etc..

2470:

International Council for Democratic Institutions and State Sovereignty

2223: 5444:

05:24, August 21, 2006, taking the liberty of moving it here instead.

5401:

05:24, August 21, 2006, taking the liberty of moving it here instead.

5229: 4395:

Icon ads spam making it like Knowledge (XXG) promotes commercial sites

3949:

Icon ads spam making it like Knowledge (XXG) promotes commercial sites

1076: 358:

Agree as well, it is ONE of the issues, but needs to be addressed. --

5539: 4523: 4094: 3299: 5015: 4887:

Hi Jimbo. I took the opportunity of you becoming a user on fr.WP to

4538: 4511: 4109: 4082: 1269:

I am going to request again here that myspace.com/bobbyboulders and

5119:

where I'm going to invite 50-100 top english wikipedians to discuss

4417: 3971: 3836:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/Han Civilisation Delist

2569:(flash needed) and scroll to 2001 and you will see what I mean. :D 573:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_arbitration/Pudgenet/Proposed_decision

220:

The response to this essay is spread out on a few different pages:

183:

on grounds of being an "attack page", and restored by Ashibaka and

5014: 4981: 3918: 3704: 3374: 1411: 5019:зарубка имеет большого кита, jimob кит, который! Бритье к китам! 5222: 4659: 4466: 4461: 4230: 4020: 4015: 3707: 3290:. She is known for filing a record number of requests under the 3287: 3018:

claimed he had evidence of abusive sockpuppetry on the part of

2374:

in order to change the interface into the real Afghan language.

1187:

Your user name or IP address has been blocked by KryptoCleric.

994: 706: 697: 577: 4979:

Here's a ham and cheese sandwich for creating Knowledge (XXG).

3838:, which shockingly editors found it to be a very minor issue. 1896:, mass-tagged pages with the WikiProject-accepted infobox with 5509:

No, he was raised in Alabama and currently lives in Florida. —

5296: 4703:

contact you about more concerns that are appearing with him.

4274:

contact you about more concerns that are appearing with him.

3936:. I don't think speaking with Jimbo is necessary for this. :) 3720: 2743: 2613: 1755:

Colbert for the behavior of idiots who act on a fucking joke.

1272:

be blacklisted, as they have been spammed repetitively by the

232:. I'll try to handle this better if there is a next time. -- 27: 5136:

writers, scientists, artists, etc., are written about in Time

3623:

How do you make the different section headlines go all black?

2907:

Hi, you probably will never read this, but what i've seen at

2525:

Hahaha, wow. Looks like Wales doesn't really like Catholicism

130:

Would you consider donating the time of some of those lovely

5258: 5139:

magazine on May 8th. I didn't notice whether Martha Stewart

4053:

I see that you have a trip planned to New York on that date

3724: 3373:

While randomly searching around Wiktionary, I stumbled onto

2942:

Who said that board members must pay for their own travel?--

2361: 1066:

If that's the case, why do we still allow fair use images?

806:

you're quoting his opinions, let's get it straight. He said:

5130:

OK, consider yourself reminded. I see that a couple of new

4631:? I would not even bring this to your attention, but I was 4202:? I would not even bring this to your attention, but I was 3711: 3249:

Hi Mr. Wales! Does this article belong on Knowledge (XXG)?

3218:

Hey, I have something in common with Jimbo Wales...Sweet!--

5133:

Supreme Court justices, the new pope, various politicians,

2811:

wishes you a very happy birthday! Enjoy your special day.

2681:

wishes you a very happy birthday! Enjoy your special day.

653:, Fred Bauder says that my vandalism warning was based on 5544:

Meinungsbild: Verwendung des Kreuz-Symbols bei Biografien

5193: 4559: 4130: 3717: 2018:

Has requested major page renames, such as what he did on

599:

pure content disputes. They do accept behavior disputes.

275:

Georgia_mother_loses_child_custody_over_humorous_religion

108:

Knowledge (XXG)'s responsibility towards a clean Internet

3422:

Not knowing where else to turn to on this, I post here.

1323:

I just wanted to let you know I received a message from

1075:

If you look at the current policy, it is quite narrow.

1045:, particularly the "note to editors" about the image.) 5567: 5564: 4783:

Would you care to give a definitive settling answer. --

4688: 4632: 4542: 4515: 4409: 4354:

Would you care to give a definitive settling answer. --

4259: 4203: 4113: 4086: 3963: 3567: 3451: 3425:

Summary: I believe that actions of a high-level admin (

3112: 3053: 3026: 1042: 871: 864: 856: 773: 683: 658: 654: 650: 638: 634: 630: 626: 395:

Indeed. We will ensure that people are actually really

187: 107: 4687:

to be unblocked, an edit of note concerned me, namely

4258:

to be unblocked, an edit of note concerned me, namely

3006:

with the specifics to follow up and fill in the gaps.

875: 571:

This is where I appeal, right? You may want to review

5146:

Any progress on this (e.g. does the list now exist)?

4745:

I am awarding you this for creating Knowledge (XXG)!

4695:

I could let you sign into my account to do it, though

4316:

I am awarding you this for creating Knowledge (XXG)!

4266:

I could let you sign into my account to do it, though

3649:

Two equal signs on both sides of the subsection title

3442:

An AMA process which Essjay refused to participate in

2973:

and a serious abuse of power. (you need to read this)

2392:

May I remind you... from Fulton J Sheen (and others):

1394:

I don't known if you are aware of the issue with the

1365:

Regarding automated reversion of good faith blankings

5215:

Ranking among all wikipedias: 64 (up from 93 in May)

4792:

Thanks for your speedy reply. And happy birthday. --

4363:

Thanks for your speedy reply. And happy birthday. --

2902: 2345:

User Themindset trying to corrupt SMS.ac page again.

956:

So, what are your perspectives on the two issues? --

788:ban him only from editing Perl-related articles." 629:

that I mentioned. Basically, Fred Bauder considered

4931:

Shouldn't your presentation text be modified into "

3646:

Three single quote marks on both sides of the title

5648:"S.L. Woman's Quest Strains Public Records System" 3820:the area claimed by China, administered by India ( 2911:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Kelly Martin2 2439:Westminster abbey will appear on Knowledge (XXG). 4472:http://apps.nitle.org/bin/view/Gametheory/WebHome 4026:http://apps.nitle.org/bin/view/Gametheory/WebHome 2011:Photo Lifting with prior examples by Douglas Kerr 1878:(who has resorted to vandalizing his own article 1460:before accepting the above statement. Thank you. 1436:Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/GraalOnline 1429:Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/GraalOnline 557:That's like storing paper US money at Fort Knox. 3305:A quick review of this article shows that it is 3298:, and for posting a large number of articles to 2233:An example of this situation can be seen on the 1817:For example, I remember reading something about 1304:Note: Blocked indefinitely as troll/imposter. — 5123:privately the future of the project in english. 3805:by PRC. A disclaimer on the image page claims: 1810:significant amount of time to Trustee duties." 1199:http://h2wiki.halowiki.net/User:RelentlessRogue 280:Jehovah's_Witnesses_and_governments#Other_cases 119:, the Internet is not a big dump truck. It's a 1345:Vandalism Problems from Road Runner HoldCo LLC 581:significant contributions to Knowledge (XXG). 3447:An attempt to move forward, ignored by Essjay 2412:The high costs of a ribbon...and Dutch misery 1505: 1463: 1118:I am not sure what is so absurd about it. -- 8: 5295:Why do you recommend deleting this article ( 3418:Disenchanted due to high-level admin actions 3142:Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary 2369: 2105:I'm looking forward to your reply. Regards, 327:unfortunately makes real names a liability. 137:PS. Thank you for supporting net neutrality. 5353:correct the entries are hopeless at best. 3636:16:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)SwedishConqueror 3512:I hope you see how horribly bad that is. -- 2237:article. I would suspect that this image: 1798:and be enlightened. Btw, RIGHT ON WAS:: --> 1511: 1469: 5099:Hello. Happy birthday (whenever it was). 2792: 2662: 1431:and you will understand what i am saying. 5158:Oh, I see: it was August 7th. I'm late. 5076: 5038: 5034:Your rambiling and insignificant friend, 3830:(claimed by India, administered by China. 3058: 2561:BBC picture of you (are you the new God?) 1538:. Some admins are up in arms about it on 1142:Well, she's badly sunburned, primarily. 641:shows the paragraph alone) was vandalism. 4867:Knowledge (XXG):Village Pump (technical) 3905:Knowledge (XXG): WikiProject Automobiles 3840: 3793: 3596:for the common good of Knowledge (XXG). 3457:What it basically comes down to for me: 3292:United States Freedom of Information Act 2903:I'm New Here, But Dismayed At What I See 2443:If I may be so bold, may I refer you to 2380:regards Ahmad Najib Biabani Ibrahimkhel 1410:and deleted the section. Your assistant 616:be about and tried to defend my actions. 285:Judge: Parents can't teach pagan beliefs 5634: 5375: 5357: 5269:might be interested in an article; see 5106:On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Jimmy Wales wrote: 4574: 4418:This external links icon ad for Last.fm 4145: 3972:This external links icon ad for Last.fm 3334:Please see my edits to that article. -- 2875:about some recent comments of Steele - 2802: 2672: 637:I warned Pudgenet about (bottom left... 179:, which has been repeatedly deleted by 5664: 5653: 4728: 4299: 2271:Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg 2242:Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg 870:And as long as we're on this subject, 505: 46:Do not edit the contents of this page. 5559:Policy proposal re: WP:BLP and WP:NOR 5174:Status of the Bengali Knowledge (XXG) 4912:Your presentation says that you are " 4777:The proposition has been raised here 4348:The proposition has been raised here 3076:where he explains how he knew that). 2006:Copyright Infringement (from AARoads) 1090:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Publicity photos 7: 3070:the same person his evidence accused 2544:WE ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO HAVE FEELINGS 170:Knowledge (XXG):Jimbo makes mistakes 5348:Originally posted on the wrong page 5309:Talk:Socialist Patients' Collective 4653:Use of Knowledge (XXG) to push hate 4449:Wikibooks book donations, questions 4224:Use of Knowledge (XXG) to push hate 4003:Wikibooks book donations, questions 3167:I'm sure Jimbo already knew this. 2888:I have had a tough day wikipediaing 2207:"Lots of NOR violations, POV stuff 1697:List of The Colbert Report episodes 2807:Knowledge (XXG) Birthday Committee 2760:Knowledge (XXG) Birthday Committee 2677:Knowledge (XXG) Birthday Committee 2630:Knowledge (XXG) Birthday Committee 2142:WP:ANI#YourCousin sockpuppeteering 922:Anaheim Hills, Anaheim, California 24: 5307:Jimbo, you might want to look at 5243:International Mother Language Day 5072:But I broke my keyboard for him. 4566:article, but that is irrelevent. 4415:Last.fm spam icon (fair use only) 4137:article, but that is irrelevent. 3969:Last.fm spam icon (fair use only) 2293:Ongoing vandalism on the article 1699:and the episode is referenced in 1094:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use criteria 4729: 4601:? Thanks for taking the time. - 4420:keeps popping up right and left. 4404: 4300: 4172:? Thanks for taking the time. - 3974:keeps popping up right and left. 3958: 3577: 3388: 3225: 3059:Here's where it gets interesting 2796: 2747: 2666: 2617: 2421:Order of the Crown (Netherlands) 2000:More Copyright Infringement 2005 1421:Knowledge (XXG):Ignore_all_rules 1406:article so we have enforced the 506: 31: 3432:Links of import on this topic: 3294:, for filing a large number of 2448:cost of trying to be reliable. 2122:Being targetted; please help me 1703:.... it's just not in the main 1534:Are we going to block the user 127:and my edit got in on Friday. 4508:If so, what is a good time? 4079:If so, what is a good time? 3109:Responses to the above on AN/I 2991:her power in unethical ways. 2955:, under Rules for candidates 2504: 2338:the author of this message is: 1325:User:Banner Making Competition 1278: 980:Wiki meetup in Dragör, Denmark 531: 247:obviously be an unfit parent. 1: 5490: 5297:Socialist Patients Collective 4683:Hi, there. After you allowed 4467:http://www.motionmountain.net 4462:http://www.apdip.net/elibrary 4254:Hi, there. After you allowed 4021:http://www.motionmountain.net 4016:http://www.apdip.net/elibrary 2837:Best wishes from Germany! -- 2707:Best wishes from Germany! -- 2445:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability 1805:WP Board of Trustees election 1712: 1573: 1408:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability 1225: 546: 541: 526: 5518: 5511: 5482: 4691:in which MyWikiBiz states, " 4558:Recently, an article on the 4262:in which MyWikiBiz states, " 4129:Recently, an article on the 3572: 3383: 3220: 3045:waiting for it to happen). 2795: 2665: 2593:What is your opinion of the 2178:How did the videos work out? 1829:'s talk page. Best regards. 1237: 536: 5627:00:58, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 5615:00:45, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 5603:14:30, 23 August 2006 (UTC) 5592:12:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC) 5574:12:11, 23 August 2006 (UTC) 5551:07:59, 23 August 2006 (UTC) 5525:00:02, 23 August 2006 (UTC) 5504:23:56, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 5468:band. I'm new as a user on 5449:13:54, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 5425:band. I'm new as a user on 5406:13:54, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 5384:05:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 5366:04:53, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 5326:23:34, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 5316:21:40, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 5282:08:26, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 5256:07:16, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 5163:01:21, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 5151:00:47, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 5084:08:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 5064:09:43, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 5057:his Knowledge (XXG) article 5046:02:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC) 5003:08:45, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 4953:15:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC) 4899:12:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC) 4874:04:21, 17 August 2006 (UTC) 4856:04:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC) 4836:15:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 4817:05:19, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 4797:16:48, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 4788:14:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 4750:06:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 4714:00:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 4668:00:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 4645:22:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 4615:19:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 4584:07:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 4546:22:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 4531:19:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 4519:05:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 4487:02:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 4441:23:28, 13 August 2006 (UTC) 4388:05:19, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 4368:16:48, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 4359:14:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 4321:06:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 4285:00:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 4239:00:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 4216:22:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 4186:19:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 4155:07:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 4117:22:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 4102:19:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 4090:05:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 4061:03:38, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 4041:02:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 3995:23:28, 13 August 2006 (UTC) 3943:01:40, 13 August 2006 (UTC) 3927:00:54, 13 August 2006 (UTC) 3863:12:13, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 3765:21:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 3703: 3698:20:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 3660:17:31, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 3641:16:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 3601:06:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 3582:00:37, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 3561:00:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 3531:16:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 3508:04:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 3498:23:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 3409:23:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 3393:06:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 3350:14:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 3341:05:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 3330:05:02, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 3317:03:12, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 3230:00:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 3202:00:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 3185:23:32, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 2352:See Talk page for details. 1995:Copyright Infringement 2003 1427:(blocked now) and also the 1232: 1218: 5689: 5194:Bengali language wikipedia 5007: 4882:fr:Utilisateur:Jіmbo Wales 4455:wikibooks:User:Whiteknight 4049:New York, 14 November 2006 4009:wikibooks:User:Whiteknight 3368:Wiktionary:User:Dangherous 3254:18:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 3172:19:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 3162:18:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 3153:17:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 3122:06:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 3103:06:14, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 2964:18:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 2947:18:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 2938:00:25, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 2923:06:31, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 2898:02:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 2883:12:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 2862:10:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 2841:10:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 2832:10:31, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 2822:09:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 2789:04:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 2732:10:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 2711:10:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 2702:10:31, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 2692:09:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 2659:04:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 2602:03:47, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 2584:15:37, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 2556:07:10, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 2530:05:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 2520:22:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 2511:21:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 2493:02:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 2464:15:35, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 2453:16:02, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 2434:23:23, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 2408:George Reeves Lives Fella 2310:16:34, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2278:14:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2260:14:57, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 2249:14:06, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 2217:Live action graphic images 2192:06:29, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2170:04:33, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2149:03:06, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2114:20:29, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 2046:19:52, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1985:16:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 1958:15:08, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 1948:11:56, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 1935:19:29, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1880:Minnesota State Highway 33 1834:00:26, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 1787:10:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1777:09:54, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1760:00:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 1743:01:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 1733:00:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 1723:23:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 1691:22:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 1682:20:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 1671:07:33, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 1643:03:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1627:01:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1618:01:03, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1608:him, he may be unblocked. 1600:02:36, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1584:01:02, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1554:00:53, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1517:06:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1489:20:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 1475:07:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 1450:18:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 1382:22:46, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 1357:22:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 1337:15:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 1299:13:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 1285:07:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 1259:00:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 1242:23:47, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 1147:22:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 1138:16:50, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 1123:12:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 1114:12:55, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 1023:18:44, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 1016:Knowledge (XXG):Ref reform 1002:15:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 972:13:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 915:13:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 883:13:17, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 772:assessment of his actions 768:, however, disagrees with 562:04:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 5223:BBC Bengali World service 4863:Knowledge (XXG):Help Desk 4735: 4306: 3879:. It's nice to meet you. 2506:The Count of Monte Cristo 2362:http://ps.wikitionary.org 2340:es:Usuario:Rossoneri 100% 2101:01:41, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2074:12:54, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 2063:es:Plantilla:Usuario nazi 1655:Colbert Report Appearance 1568:violation. Case closed. 1280:The Count of Monte Cristo 1101:21:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 1088:I've responded to you at 1084:20:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 1071:19:57, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 1061:16:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 905:01:08 31 July 2006 (UTC) 847:18:49, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 793:18:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 753:14:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 731:23:01, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 724:I'd rather learn Python 3 714:19:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 691:18:18, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 671:14:11, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 607:08:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 589:04:42, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 512: 494:23:36, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 454:21:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 442:17:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 423:20:56, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 414:02:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 390:02:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 373:00:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 363:21:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 354:21:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 335:21:25, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 312:23:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 302:22:36, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 267:22:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 252:21:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 237:04:33, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 203:16:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 194:21:45, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 161:04:32, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 148:ΑΝΥΠΟΤΑΞΙΑ, ΑΠΑΛΛΑΓΗ, Ι-5 5650:. The Salt Lake Tribune. 5275:User talk:Treebark/Table 5267:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost 5142:made the list this time. 4880:A "welcome question" to 4498:Proposal for a SF meetup 4069:Proposal for a SF meetup 3131:Help with edit summaries 2855:can you have a look here 2725:can you have a look here 1564:). If it isn't, it's a 1530:User talk:Stephencolbert 1296:Banner Making Competiton 1265:Bobby Boulders spamlinks 960:20:23 31 July 2006 (UTC) 230:Village pump (proposals) 146: 3890:Very troublesome member 2498:Roman Catholic category 2370:http://ps.wikibooks.org 2289:Vandalism on PBS idents 2024:User_talk:Youngamerican 2022:. As what he stated on 1695:It's alive and well in 1425:User_talk:Graal_unixmad 156:Net Neutrality rox0rz! 5663:Check date values in: 5020: 4987: 3883:19:16, 12 August 2006 3845: 3798: 3673:User:Jakinthebeenstalk 3468:system to improvement. 1969:move restrictions). -- 1442:Thanks for your time. 1166:HaloWiki Account Block 945:community, city, state 861:One of the arbitrators 696:My involvement in the 5440:Originally posted on 5397:Originally posted on 5203:Registered users: 704 5026:WHY DO YOU NOT ANSWER 5018: 4985: 4739:The Original Barnstar 4633:told in the Talk page 4569:Being as you are the 4480:en.wikibooks userpage 4433:to future offenders. 4310:The Original Barnstar 4204:told in the Talk page 4140:Being as you are the 4034:en.wikibooks userpage 3987:to future offenders. 3870: 3844: 3797: 2871:There is a thread on 2567:this BBC news article 2384:Administrative Change 1863:(for the most part), 1274:Bobby Boulders vandal 1194:Return to Main Page. 776:, where he says that 516:The Original Barnstar 226:User_talk:Jimbo_Wales 222:Village pump (policy) 175:This is an essay, by 44:of past discussions. 18:User talk:Jimbo Wales 5642:Smith, Christopher ( 5513:this is messedrocker 4765:more important than 4524:I am having a meetup 4336:more important than 4095:I am having a meetup 3677:I think thats right. 2928:WP Board of Trustees 2817:Have a good one :) - 2687:Have a good one :) - 2020:Ohio State Highway 7 1540:the user's talk page 1387:The GraalOnline page 1312:13:52, 02 August '06 926:La Jolla, California 924:page as well as the 567:Pudgenet arbitration 5480:Are you from Wales? 5376:Facts are stubborn. 5358:Facts are stubborn. 5271:User:Treebark/Table 5206:Total edits: 34,363 5200:Article count: 4501 3543:User talk:MyWikiBiz 2849:New messages on wfm 2719:New messages on wfm 5079:User talk:Dfrg.msc 5041:User talk:Dfrg.msc 5021: 5011:Prayers unanswered 4988: 4889:ask you a question 4676:New concerns with 4543:leave me a message 4516:leave me a message 4247:New concerns with 4114:leave me a message 4087:leave me a message 3846: 3799: 2762:! Have a nice day! 2737:Happy Birthday! :D 2632:! Have a nice day! 2607:Happy Birthday! :D 2426:Faithfully yours, 1859:(just yesterday), 1705:The Colbert Report 876:ignoring all rules 473:Re your comment: " 5239:Language Movement 4970: 4969: 4854: 4841:What is going on? 4755: 4754: 4665:His Excellency... 4326: 4325: 4236:His Excellency... 3822:Arunachal Pradesh 3812: 3678: 3591:An Injustice Done 3276:illegal immigrant 2815: 2814: 2787: 2766: 2765: 2685: 2684: 2657: 2636: 2635: 2299:User:68.40.190.58 2044: 1819:User:Kelly Martin 857:Jimbo Wales wrote 555: 554: 469:On a similar note 360:Kim van der Linde 112:Hello Mr. Wales, 105: 104: 56: 55: 50:current talk page 5680: 5673: 5672: 5666: 5661: 5659: 5651: 5639: 5522: 5521: 5515: 5514: 5499: 5492: 5434:Blackmail (band) 5391:Blackmail (band) 5377: 5359: 5331:Oh, ok sorry! ~ 5082: 5080: 5044: 5042: 4960: 4956: 4937:Knowledge (XXG). 4850: 4733: 4726: 4725: 4711: 4582: 4408: 4304: 4297: 4296: 4282: 4153: 3962: 3940: 3860: 3855: 3809: 3762: 3757: 3752: 3728: 3695: 3690: 3685: 3676: 3638:SwedishConqueror 3634:SwedishConqueror 3609:SwedishConqueror 3579: 3574: 3558: 3529: 3523: 3517: 3496: 3490: 3484: 3406: 3390: 3385: 3338: 3314: 3227: 3222: 3150: 3100:SecondMostLikely 2915:is unfortunate. 2808: 2800: 2793: 2783: 2780: 2754:Happy Birthday, 2751: 2744: 2678: 2670: 2663: 2653: 2650: 2624:Happy Birthday, 2621: 2614: 2581: 2576: 2508: 2483:User:Edwardlucas 2356:Can you help me? 2303:User:Georgia guy 2189: 2038: 2035: 1905: 1899: 1895: 1889: 1774: 1714: 1668: 1640: 1615: 1597: 1575: 1551: 1513: 1507: 1471: 1465: 1379: 1319:Password concern 1313: 1308: 1282: 1256: 1239: 1234: 1227: 1220: 1197:Retrieved from " 1136: 1054: 935:community, state 548: 543: 538: 533: 528: 510: 503: 502: 492: 435: 407: 347: 150: 83: 58: 57: 35: 34: 28: 5688: 5687: 5683: 5682: 5681: 5679: 5678: 5677: 5676: 5662: 5652: 5641: 5640: 5636: 5581: 5561: 5536: 5519: 5512: 5478: 5470:Knowledge (XXG) 5464:. It's about a 5437: 5427:Knowledge (XXG) 5421:. It's about a 5394: 5345: 5293: 5230:small tutorials 5190:lone bueraucrat 5176: 5097: 5078: 5040: 5013: 4977: 4918:Knowledge (XXG) 4885: 4843: 4829: 4801:His reply was: 4775: 4724: 4709: 4681: 4655: 4625: 4594: 4564:Deletion Review 4556: 4500: 4453:Hello, this is 4451: 4397: 4372:His reply was: 4346: 4295: 4280: 4252: 4226: 4196: 4165: 4135:Deletion Review 4127: 4071: 4051: 4007:Hello, this is 4005: 3951: 3938: 3896:User:Wiarthurhu 3892: 3873: 3858: 3853: 3792: 3760: 3755: 3750: 3693: 3688: 3683: 3670: 3611: 3593: 3554: 3546: 3525: 3519: 3513: 3492: 3486: 3480: 3420: 3404: 3371: 3336: 3312: 3265:Barbara Schwarz 3259:Barbara Schwarz 3247: 3146: 3140:tab, and check 3133: 3113:Fred's response 3061: 3012: 2997: 2975: 2957:- since removed 2930: 2905: 2890: 2869: 2851: 2819:Ladybirdintheuk 2806: 2778: 2739: 2721: 2689:Ladybirdintheuk 2676: 2648: 2609: 2595:Stephen Colbert 2591: 2589:Stephen Colbert 2579: 2571: 2563: 2538: 2500: 2473: 2429:Robert Prummel 2414: 2386: 2358: 2347: 2319: 2291: 2219: 2205: 2187: 2180: 2159: 2124: 2056: 2033: 1903: 1901:cleanup-infobox 1897: 1893: 1887: 1841: 1807: 1775: 1770: 1669: 1664: 1657: 1641: 1636: 1613: 1598: 1593: 1552: 1547: 1532: 1389: 1375: 1367: 1347: 1321: 1314: 1311: 1306: 1292: 1267: 1254: 1175:Knowledge (XXG) 1168: 1132: 1050: 1034: 1012: 982: 896: 893:User:Coolcaesar 569: 501: 484: 471: 433: 405: 345: 210: 173: 121:series of tubes 110: 79: 32: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5686: 5684: 5675: 5674: 5633: 5632: 5631: 5630: 5629: 5606: 5605: 5580: 5579:from a BIG fan 5577: 5560: 5557: 5555: 5535: 5532: 5530: 5528: 5527: 5481: 5477: 5474: 5459: 5436: 5431: 5416: 5393: 5388: 5387: 5386: 5344: 5343:Accountability 5341: 5339: 5337: 5336: 5319: 5318: 5292: 5289: 5287: 5285: 5284: 5236: 5217: 5216: 5213: 5212:Bureaucrats: 1 5210: 5207: 5204: 5201: 5186: 5185: 5175: 5172: 5170: 5168: 5167: 5166: 5165: 5144: 5143: 5140: 5137: 5134: 5131: 5125: 5124: 5120: 5116: 5110: 5108: 5107: 5096: 5093: 5091: 5089: 5088: 5087: 5086: 5067: 5066: 5061:Samuel Wantman 5012: 5009: 4976: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4945: 4944: 4928: 4927: 4922: 4921: 4910: 4906: 4905: 4884: 4878: 4877: 4876: 4842: 4839: 4828: 4825: 4823: 4821: 4820: 4774: 4759: 4757: 4753: 4752: 4742: 4741: 4736: 4734: 4723: 4720: 4718: 4685:User:MyWikiBiz 4680: 4678:User:MyWikiBiz 4674: 4672: 4654: 4651: 4649: 4624: 4621: 4619: 4593: 4590: 4588: 4555: 4554:SWGEmu Article 4552: 4550: 4539:lots of issues 4512:lots of issues 4499: 4496: 4494: 4491: 4475: 4474: 4469: 4464: 4450: 4447: 4445: 4422: 4421: 4412: 4396: 4393: 4392: 4391: 4345: 4330: 4328: 4324: 4323: 4313: 4312: 4307: 4305: 4294: 4291: 4289: 4256:User:MyWikiBiz 4251: 4249:User:MyWikiBiz 4245: 4243: 4225: 4222: 4220: 4195: 4192: 4190: 4164: 4161: 4159: 4126: 4125:SWGEmu Article 4123: 4121: 4110:lots of issues 4083:lots of issues 4070: 4067: 4065: 4050: 4047: 4045: 4029: 4028: 4023: 4018: 4004: 4001: 3999: 3976: 3975: 3966: 3950: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3909:User:ApolloBoy 3891: 3888: 3886: 3875:Hi Jimmy, I'm 3872: 3869: 3867: 3832: 3831: 3825: 3814: 3813: 3791: 3788: 3786: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3702: 3669: 3666: 3664: 3654: 3653: 3650: 3647: 3628: 3627: 3624: 3621: 3610: 3607: 3605: 3592: 3589: 3587: 3585: 3584: 3545: 3540: 3538: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3470: 3469: 3465: 3462: 3455: 3454: 3449: 3444: 3439: 3419: 3416: 3414: 3412: 3411: 3370: 3365: 3363: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3284:Salt Lake City 3246: 3245:Attack article 3243: 3241: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3132: 3129: 3127: 3125: 3124: 3066:Mantanmoreland 3060: 3057: 3020:Mantanmoreland 3011: 3008: 2996: 2993: 2974: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2929: 2926: 2904: 2901: 2889: 2886: 2868: 2865: 2850: 2847: 2845: 2843: 2842: 2813: 2812: 2801: 2764: 2763: 2752: 2738: 2735: 2720: 2717: 2715: 2713: 2712: 2683: 2682: 2671: 2634: 2633: 2622: 2608: 2605: 2590: 2587: 2562: 2559: 2537: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2499: 2496: 2472: 2467: 2461:Robert Prummel 2456: 2455: 2431:Robert Prummel 2419:On the page " 2413: 2410: 2407: 2385: 2382: 2357: 2354: 2346: 2343: 2318: 2313: 2290: 2287: 2285: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2263: 2262: 2218: 2215: 2204: 2201: 2199: 2196: 2179: 2176: 2174: 2158: 2155: 2153: 2123: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2055: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2027: 2016: 2013: 2008: 2003: 1997: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1840: 1837: 1806: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1790: 1789: 1769: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1735: 1663: 1656: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1635: 1602: 1592: 1546: 1536:Stephencolbert 1531: 1528: 1526: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1478: 1477: 1441: 1419:content using 1388: 1385: 1366: 1363: 1361: 1354:Arbiteroftruth 1350: 1346: 1343: 1341: 1320: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1310: 1291: 1288: 1266: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1167: 1164: 1162: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1103: 1033: 1026: 1011: 1008: 1006: 981: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 962: 961: 949: 948: 941: 918: 917: 895: 889: 887: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 798: 797: 796: 795: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 736: 735: 734: 733: 717: 716: 702: 701: 676: 675: 674: 673: 664: 645: 644: 643: 642: 620: 619: 618: 617: 610: 609: 600: 568: 565: 553: 552: 519: 518: 513: 511: 500: 497: 470: 467: 465: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 378: 377: 376: 375: 356: 337: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 289: 288: 287: 282: 277: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 209: 206: 172: 167: 166: 165: 164: 163: 138: 109: 106: 103: 102: 97: 94: 89: 84: 77: 72: 67: 64: 54: 53: 36: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5685: 5670: 5657: 5649: 5645: 5638: 5635: 5628: 5625: 5621: 5618: 5617: 5616: 5613: 5608: 5607: 5604: 5601: 5596: 5595: 5594: 5593: 5590: 5584: 5578: 5576: 5575: 5572: 5568: 5565: 5558: 5556: 5553: 5552: 5549: 5545: 5541: 5533: 5531: 5526: 5523: 5516: 5508: 5507: 5506: 5505: 5502: 5498: 5497: 5493: 5488: 5487: 5475: 5473: 5471: 5467: 5463: 5457: 5452: 5451: 5450: 5447: 5443: 5435: 5432: 5430: 5428: 5424: 5420: 5414: 5409: 5408: 5407: 5404: 5400: 5392: 5389: 5385: 5382: 5381: 5374: 5370: 5369: 5368: 5367: 5364: 5363: 5356: 5350: 5349: 5342: 5340: 5334: 5330: 5329: 5328: 5327: 5324: 5317: 5314: 5313:Michael Hardy 5310: 5306: 5305: 5304: 5302: 5298: 5290: 5288: 5283: 5280: 5276: 5272: 5268: 5264: 5263: 5262: 5260: 5257: 5254: 5249: 5246: 5244: 5240: 5234: 5231: 5226: 5224: 5220: 5214: 5211: 5208: 5205: 5202: 5199: 5198: 5197: 5195: 5191: 5184: 5181: 5180: 5179: 5173: 5171: 5164: 5161: 5160:Michael Hardy 5157: 5156: 5155: 5154: 5153: 5152: 5149: 5148:Michael Hardy 5141: 5138: 5135: 5132: 5129: 5128: 5127: 5121: 5117: 5113: 5112: 5111: 5105: 5104: 5103: 5100: 5094: 5092: 5085: 5081: 5075: 5071: 5070: 5069: 5068: 5065: 5062: 5058: 5054: 5050: 5049: 5048: 5047: 5043: 5037: 5032: 5029: 5027: 5017: 5010: 5008: 5005: 5004: 5001: 5000: 4995: 4994: 4984: 4980: 4974: 4967: 4966: 4965: 4959: 4954: 4951: 4947: 4946: 4942: 4938: 4936: 4930: 4929: 4924: 4923: 4919: 4917: 4911: 4908: 4907: 4903: 4902: 4901: 4900: 4897: 4892: 4890: 4883: 4879: 4875: 4872: 4868: 4864: 4860: 4859: 4858: 4857: 4853: 4849: 4840: 4838: 4837: 4834: 4826: 4824: 4818: 4815: 4812:(provided by 4811: 4807: 4804: 4803: 4802: 4799: 4798: 4795: 4790: 4789: 4786: 4781: 4779: 4772: 4768: 4764: 4760: 4758: 4751: 4748: 4744: 4743: 4740: 4737: 4732: 4727: 4721: 4719: 4716: 4715: 4712: 4704: 4700: 4698: 4696: 4690: 4686: 4679: 4675: 4673: 4670: 4669: 4666: 4661: 4652: 4650: 4647: 4646: 4642: 4638: 4634: 4630: 4622: 4620: 4617: 4616: 4612: 4608: 4604: 4600: 4592:Trip to Delhi 4591: 4589: 4586: 4585: 4581: 4577: 4572: 4567: 4565: 4561: 4553: 4551: 4548: 4547: 4544: 4540: 4536: 4533: 4532: 4529: 4525: 4521: 4520: 4517: 4513: 4509: 4506: 4503: 4497: 4495: 4492: 4489: 4488: 4485: 4481: 4473: 4470: 4468: 4465: 4463: 4460: 4459: 4458: 4456: 4448: 4446: 4443: 4442: 4439: 4434: 4431: 4427: 4419: 4416: 4413: 4411: 4407: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4394: 4389: 4386: 4383:(provided by 4382: 4378: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4370: 4369: 4366: 4361: 4360: 4357: 4352: 4350: 4343: 4339: 4335: 4331: 4329: 4322: 4319: 4315: 4314: 4311: 4308: 4303: 4298: 4292: 4290: 4287: 4286: 4283: 4275: 4271: 4269: 4267: 4261: 4257: 4250: 4246: 4244: 4241: 4240: 4237: 4232: 4223: 4221: 4218: 4217: 4213: 4209: 4205: 4201: 4193: 4191: 4188: 4187: 4183: 4179: 4175: 4171: 4163:Trip to Delhi 4162: 4160: 4157: 4156: 4152: 4148: 4143: 4138: 4136: 4132: 4124: 4122: 4119: 4118: 4115: 4111: 4107: 4104: 4103: 4100: 4096: 4092: 4091: 4088: 4084: 4080: 4077: 4074: 4068: 4066: 4063: 4062: 4059: 4055: 4048: 4046: 4043: 4042: 4039: 4035: 4027: 4024: 4022: 4019: 4017: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4010: 4002: 4000: 3997: 3996: 3993: 3988: 3985: 3981: 3973: 3970: 3967: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3948: 3944: 3941: 3935: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3925: 3920: 3915: 3910: 3906: 3901: 3897: 3889: 3887: 3884: 3882: 3878: 3868: 3865: 3864: 3861: 3856: 3849: 3843: 3839: 3837: 3829: 3826: 3823: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3804: 3796: 3789: 3787: 3766: 3763: 3758: 3753: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3742: 3741: 3740: 3739: 3738: 3737: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3726: 3722: 3719: 3716: 3713: 3709: 3706: 3700: 3699: 3696: 3691: 3686: 3679: 3674: 3667: 3665: 3662: 3661: 3658: 3651: 3648: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3625: 3622: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3614: 3608: 3606: 3603: 3602: 3599: 3590: 3588: 3583: 3580: 3575: 3569: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3559: 3557: 3552: 3544: 3541: 3539: 3532: 3528: 3522: 3516: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3506: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3495: 3489: 3483: 3477: 3474: 3466: 3463: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3453: 3450: 3448: 3445: 3443: 3440: 3438: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3430: 3428: 3423: 3417: 3415: 3410: 3407: 3401: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3391: 3386: 3380: 3376: 3369: 3366: 3364: 3351: 3348: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3339: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3315: 3308: 3304: 3303: 3301: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3273: 3272:Bretschneider 3270: 3266: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3256: 3255: 3252: 3244: 3242: 3231: 3228: 3223: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3203: 3200: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3186: 3182: 3181: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3170: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3160: 3155: 3154: 3151: 3149: 3143: 3139: 3130: 3128: 3123: 3120: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3101: 3095: 3091: 3088: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3056: 3054: 3051: 3046: 3043: 3042:Humus sapiens 3039: 3033: 3029: 3027: 3023: 3021: 3017: 3009: 3007: 3003: 3001: 2994: 2992: 2988: 2986: 2981: 2980: 2972: 2969: 2965: 2962: 2961:Paul E. Ester 2958: 2954: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2945: 2940: 2939: 2936: 2927: 2925: 2924: 2921: 2916: 2913: 2912: 2908: 2900: 2899: 2896: 2887: 2885: 2884: 2881: 2877: 2874: 2867:Robert Steele 2866: 2864: 2863: 2860: 2856: 2848: 2846: 2840: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2830: 2824: 2823: 2820: 2810: 2809: 2799: 2794: 2791: 2790: 2786: 2785:Review Me! :D 2781: 2775: 2771: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2750: 2746: 2745: 2742: 2736: 2734: 2733: 2730: 2726: 2718: 2716: 2710: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2700: 2694: 2693: 2690: 2680: 2679: 2669: 2664: 2661: 2660: 2656: 2655:Review Me! :D 2651: 2645: 2641: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2620: 2616: 2615: 2612: 2606: 2604: 2603: 2600: 2599:71.197.196.45 2596: 2588: 2586: 2585: 2582: 2577: 2574: 2568: 2560: 2558: 2557: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2545: 2536:Brian Peppers 2535: 2531: 2528: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2518: 2513: 2512: 2509: 2507: 2497: 2495: 2494: 2491: 2486: 2484: 2480: 2479: 2471: 2468: 2466: 2465: 2462: 2454: 2451: 2446: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2436: 2435: 2432: 2427: 2424: 2422: 2417: 2411: 2409: 2403: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2393: 2390: 2383: 2381: 2378: 2375: 2372: 2371: 2367: 2364: 2363: 2355: 2353: 2350: 2344: 2342: 2341: 2336: 2335: 2331: 2330: 2327: 2326: 2322: 2317: 2314: 2312: 2311: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2288: 2286: 2279: 2276: 2272: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2261: 2258: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2236: 2231: 2229: 2225: 2216: 2214: 2211: 2208: 2202: 2200: 2197: 2194: 2193: 2190: 2185: 2177: 2175: 2172: 2171: 2168: 2164: 2156: 2154: 2151: 2150: 2147: 2143: 2138: 2133: 2129: 2121: 2115: 2112: 2110: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2099: 2097: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2072: 2070: 2064: 2059: 2053: 2047: 2042: 2037: 2036: 2028: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2014: 2012: 2009: 2007: 2004: 2001: 1998: 1996: 1993: 1992: 1990: 1986: 1983: 1981: 1977: 1973: 1968: 1963: 1959: 1956: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1946: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1933: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1916: 1914: 1910: 1902: 1892: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1838: 1836: 1835: 1832: 1828: 1823: 1820: 1815: 1811: 1804: 1797: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1788: 1785: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1773: 1768: 1767:Nick Catalano 1762: 1761: 1758: 1744: 1741: 1736: 1734: 1731: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1721: 1718: 1715: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1689: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1680: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1667: 1662: 1661:Nick Catalano 1654: 1644: 1639: 1634: 1633:Nick Catalano 1630: 1629: 1628: 1625: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1616: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1601: 1596: 1591: 1590:Nick Catalano 1587: 1586: 1585: 1582: 1579: 1576: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1550: 1545: 1544:Nick Catalano 1541: 1537: 1529: 1527: 1518: 1515: 1514: 1512:Daniel.Bryant 1508: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1490: 1487: 1486:87.88.155.179 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1476: 1473: 1472: 1470:Daniel.Bryant 1466: 1459: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1448: 1447:Graal unixmad 1443: 1439: 1437: 1432: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1392: 1386: 1384: 1383: 1380: 1378: 1372: 1364: 1362: 1359: 1358: 1355: 1344: 1342: 1339: 1338: 1335: 1331: 1330:User:Sythriss 1326: 1318: 1309: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1297: 1289: 1287: 1286: 1283: 1281: 1275: 1271: 1264: 1260: 1257: 1251: 1250:see block log 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1240: 1235: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1221: 1215: 1212: 1209: 1205: 1202: 1200: 1195: 1192: 1188: 1185: 1182: 1178: 1176: 1171: 1165: 1163: 1148: 1145: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1102: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1069: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1059: 1055: 1053: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1039:Jewel Kilcher 1031: 1028:Problem with 1027: 1025: 1024: 1021: 1017: 1009: 1007: 1004: 1003: 1000: 996: 991: 987: 979: 973: 970: 966: 965: 964: 963: 959: 955: 954: 953: 946: 942: 940: 936: 932: 931: 930: 927: 923: 916: 913: 908: 907: 906: 904: 900: 894: 890: 888: 885: 884: 881: 877: 873: 868: 866: 862: 858: 848: 845: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 825: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 794: 791: 787: 783: 779: 775: 771: 767: 764: 763: 762: 761: 754: 751: 746: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 732: 729: 725: 721: 720: 719: 718: 715: 712: 708: 704: 703: 699: 695: 694: 693: 692: 689: 685: 682: 672: 669: 662: 660: 656: 652: 649: 648: 647: 646: 640: 636: 635:the paragraph 632: 628: 627:the talk page 624: 623: 622: 621: 614: 613: 612: 611: 608: 605: 601: 598: 593: 592: 591: 590: 587: 582: 579: 574: 566: 564: 563: 560: 551: 550: 549: 544: 539: 534: 529: 521: 520: 517: 514: 509: 504: 498: 496: 495: 491: 487: 481: 477: 468: 466: 455: 451: 450: 445: 444: 443: 440: 439: 436: 431: 426: 425: 424: 421: 417: 416: 415: 412: 411: 408: 403: 398: 394: 393: 392: 391: 388: 384: 374: 371: 366: 365: 364: 361: 357: 355: 352: 351: 348: 343: 338: 336: 332: 331: 325: 324: 313: 310: 305: 304: 303: 300: 299: 295: 290: 286: 283: 281: 278: 276: 273: 272: 270: 269: 268: 265: 260: 259: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 250: 238: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 216: 215: 214: 213: 212: 211: 207: 205: 204: 201: 196: 195: 192: 188: 186: 182: 178: 177:User:Ashibaka 171: 168: 162: 159: 155: 154: 153: 152: 151: 149: 144: 140: 135: 133: 128: 126: 122: 118: 113: 101: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 82: 78: 76: 73: 71: 68: 65: 63: 60: 59: 51: 47: 43: 42: 37: 30: 29: 26: 19: 5637: 5620:Uncyclopedia 5585: 5582: 5562: 5554: 5548:Sei Shonagon 5537: 5534:Kreuz-Symbol 5529: 5495: 5485: 5479: 5453: 5439: 5438: 5410: 5396: 5395: 5379: 5361: 5351: 5347: 5346: 5338: 5320: 5294: 5286: 5250: 5247: 5235: 5227: 5221: 5218: 5187: 5182: 5177: 5169: 5145: 5126: 5109: 5101: 5098: 5090: 5053:"about 2500" 5052: 5033: 5030: 5025: 5022: 5006: 4997: 4991: 4989: 4978: 4962: 4961: 4934: 4932: 4915: 4913: 4909:Hello Jimbo, 4893: 4886: 4844: 4830: 4822: 4805: 4800: 4791: 4782: 4776: 4756: 4738: 4717: 4705: 4701: 4694: 4692: 4682: 4671: 4656: 4648: 4626: 4623:Admin recall 4618: 4595: 4587: 4571:Chief Tamale 4570: 4568: 4557: 4549: 4537: 4534: 4522: 4510: 4507: 4504: 4501: 4493: 4490: 4482:. Thanks. -- 4476: 4452: 4444: 4438:62.147.37.34 4435: 4423: 4398: 4376: 4371: 4362: 4353: 4347: 4327: 4309: 4288: 4276: 4272: 4265: 4263: 4253: 4242: 4227: 4219: 4197: 4194:Admin recall 4189: 4166: 4158: 4142:Chief Tamale 4141: 4139: 4128: 4120: 4108: 4105: 4093: 4081: 4078: 4075: 4072: 4064: 4052: 4044: 4036:. Thanks. -- 4030: 4006: 3998: 3992:62.147.37.34 3989: 3977: 3952: 3893: 3885: 3874: 3866: 3850: 3847: 3833: 3815: 3811:sovereignty. 3802: 3800: 3785: 3701: 3680: 3671: 3668:Please Block 3663: 3655: 3632: 3629: 3615: 3612: 3604: 3594: 3586: 3555: 3547: 3537: 3478: 3475: 3471: 3456: 3431: 3424: 3421: 3413: 3378: 3372: 3362: 3347:Steve Dufour 3327:Steve Dufour 3302:newsgroups. 3271: 3268: 3264: 3257: 3251:Steve Dufour 3248: 3240: 3179: 3157:Awesome!!!-- 3156: 3147: 3141: 3137: 3134: 3126: 3111:, including 3096: 3092: 3089: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3069: 3065: 3062: 3047: 3034: 3030: 3024: 3013: 3004: 2998: 2989: 2982: 2977: 2976: 2941: 2931: 2917: 2914: 2909: 2906: 2891: 2870: 2852: 2844: 2825: 2816: 2804: 2767: 2755: 2740: 2722: 2714: 2695: 2686: 2674: 2637: 2625: 2610: 2592: 2572: 2564: 2548: 2543: 2542: 2539: 2514: 2505: 2501: 2487: 2476: 2475:This week's 2474: 2457: 2437: 2428: 2425: 2418: 2415: 2404: 2402: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2391: 2387: 2379: 2376: 2373: 2368: 2365: 2359: 2351: 2348: 2337: 2332: 2328: 2323: 2320: 2292: 2284: 2232: 2220: 2212: 2209: 2206: 2198: 2195: 2181: 2173: 2160: 2152: 2125: 2106: 2093: 2088: 2066: 2060: 2058:Dear Jimbo, 2057: 2032: 1970: 1920: 1917: 1891:cleanup-name 1857:Northenglish 1842: 1824: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1763: 1753: 1677:bunk to me. 1658: 1605: 1533: 1525: 1503: 1461: 1457: 1444: 1440: 1433: 1393: 1390: 1376: 1368: 1360: 1348: 1340: 1322: 1293: 1279: 1268: 1223: 1222: 1216: 1213: 1210: 1206: 1203: 1196: 1193: 1189: 1186: 1183: 1179: 1172: 1169: 1161: 1107:Mira Sorvino 1051: 1035: 1013: 1005: 983: 958:Ericsaindon2 950: 919: 903:Ericsaindon2 897: 886: 872:Mindspillage 869: 865:his userpage 855: 823: 785: 744: 723: 679: 677: 596: 583: 570: 556: 524: 523: 515: 474: 472: 464: 448: 428: 400: 396: 382: 379: 340: 329: 292: 271:Believe it. 249:Ken Arromdee 245: 217: 197: 174: 158:MyrddinEmrys 143:Project2501a 141: 136: 132:Bomis ladies 129: 125:Autofellatio 114: 111: 80: 45: 39: 25: 5600:HResearcher 5571:HResearcher 5333:Unfortunate 5323:Jimbo Wales 5301:Unfortunate 4986:Mmm, tasty. 4852:EVIL, EVIL! 4528:Jimbo Wales 4484:Whiteknight 4430:WP:SPAMICON 4099:Jimbo Wales 4038:Whiteknight 3984:WP:SPAMICON 3934:arbitration 3598:Slowcheetah 3515:Kickstart70 3482:Kickstart70 3427:User:Essjay 3323:fair gaming 3199:Jimbo Wales 3159:Jimbo Wales 2953:user:Essjay 2944:Jimbo Wales 2935:Barry Wells 2857:please? :) 2758:, from the 2756:Jimbo Wales 2741:Hey Jimbo! 2727:please? :) 2628:, from the 2626:Jimbo Wales 2611:Hey Jimbo! 2517:Jimbo Wales 2490:Daniel Case 2161:Please see 1884:Jonathunder 1861:Gateman1997 1831:Barry Wells 1827:User:Essjay 1728:television. 1566:WP:USERNAME 1458:whole truth 1417:GraalOnline 1404:GraalOnline 1400:GraalOnline 1396:GraalOnline 1371:TommyTheGun 1211:Thank you. 1120:Jimbo Wales 1081:Jimbo Wales 1058:Jimbo Wales 997:? Regards, 969:Jimbo Wales 912:Jimbo Wales 743:Why should 476:importance. 309:Ben Houston 264:Ben Houston 234:Ben Houston 224:(here), on 200:Jimbo Wales 185:User:Friday 117:Ted Stevens 38:This is an 5644:2003-05-11 5566:and WP:NOR 5446:AnonEMouse 5403:AnonEMouse 5251:Thanks. -- 4603:Aksi_great 4174:Aksi_great 3903:member of 3828:Aksai Chin 3307:referenced 3282:living in 3117:SlimVirgin 3000:SlimVirgin 2971:SlimVirgin 2839:Simplicius 2709:Simplicius 2295:PBS idents 2184:mboverload 2128:YourCousin 2089:any reason 1972:Rschen7754 1922:Rschen7754 1872:Censorwolf 1701:truthiness 1445:Stephane. 1349:Dear Sir, 1170:Dear sir, 1077:For images 1010:Ref reform 995:wikimeetup 782:Simetrical 766:Simetrical 604:AnAccount2 397:interested 208:Discussion 100:Archive 15 92:Archive 12 87:Archive 11 81:Archive 10 5656:cite news 5612:WAS 4.250 5546:. Danke, 5476:Last name 5462:blackmail 5456:Suduser85 5442:user page 5419:blackmail 5413:Suduser85 5399:user page 5380:Comments? 5362:Comments? 5209:Admins: 5 5188:I am the 4968:on fr:WP) 4948:Thanks. 4941:this page 4848:Lego@lost 4814:WAS 4.250 4710:Cowman109 4637:rootology 4629:WP:RECALL 4611:review me 4426:WP:ICONAD 4385:WAS 4.250 4281:Cowman109 4208:rootology 4200:WP:RECALL 4182:review me 3980:WP:ICONAD 3939:Cowman109 3871:I'm Felix 3657:WAS 4.250 3476:Regards, 3405:Cowman109 3148:Cyde Weys 3016:IPFrehley 3014:Recently 2920:Attic Owl 2895:Carptrash 2553:WatchHawk 2478:Economist 2450:WAS 4.250 2167:User:HOTR 2132:talk page 2109:Yellow up 2096:Yellow up 2069:Yellow up 1757:WAS 4.250 1679:Ivymike21 1506:Killfest2 1464:Killfest2 1377:Cyde Weys 1255:Cowman109 1043:this edit 939:community 770:-Barry-'s 728:WAS 4.250 688:WAS 4.250 678:You said: 559:WAS 4.250 480:amendment 228:, and on 191:Samael775 75:Archive 9 70:Archive 8 62:Archive 5 5095:reminder 5074:Dfrg.msc 5036:Dfrg.msc 4958:Bradipus 4950:Alex lbh 4935:supports 4896:Alex lbh 4871:Carnildo 4794:Barberio 4785:Barberio 4747:Jeffklib 4722:Barnstar 4689:this one 4597:clarify 4365:Barberio 4356:Barberio 4318:Jeffklib 4293:Barnstar 4260:this one 4168:clarify 3924:Karrmann 3914:WP:CIVIL 3854:=Nichalp 3790:POV maps 3715:redirect 3296:lawsuits 3274:, is an 2527:DominicS 2235:clitorus 2228:User:MCB 2224:this guy 2203:Sveasoft 1980:contribs 1945:Tyrenius 1930:contribs 1839:Highways 1391:Hi Jim, 1233:lentless 1214:Cheers, 842:all..." 722:You say 181:User:Zoe 5589:Esmehwk 5291:THE SPK 5279:gadfium 5192:of the 4916:governs 4833:Dweller 4763:WP:NPOV 4334:WP:NPOV 4058:CoolGuy 3859:«Talk»= 3803:claimed 3630:Thanks 3280:Germany 3180:Johntex 3138:Editing 3072:!!!!! ( 3050:WP:SOCK 3010:Details 2985:WP:SOCK 2880:JoshuaZ 2770:Deon555 2640:Deon555 2551:dies.-- 2321:hello, 2146:Ryūlóng 2137:Repmart 1772:contrib 1666:contrib 1638:contrib 1595:contrib 1562:WP:AUTO 1549:contrib 1307:FireFox 1130:Sherool 891:RFA on 880:-Barry- 844:-Barry- 790:Steve p 778:-Barry- 750:-Barry- 711:-Barry- 668:-Barry- 659:warning 586:-Barry- 527:Viva La 499:For You 449:Johntex 430:Deckill 402:Deckill 342:Deckill 330:Johntex 41:archive 5665:|date= 5540:absurd 5520:(talk) 5501:(talk) 5466:German 5454:From: 5423:German 5411:From: 4926:(XXG). 4771:WP:NOR 4576:Ameise 4560:SWGEmu 4342:WP:NOR 4147:Ameise 4131:SWGEmu 3900:WP:POV 3824:), and 3337:Trödel 3313:Trödel 3300:Usenet 3074:Here's 3038:Morven 2995:Basics 2565:Go to 2257:Powers 2034:Seicer 1967:WP:ANI 1955:Powers 1913:WP:ANI 1876:Elkman 1869:Rt66lt 1865:B.Wind 1853:Beirne 1849:PHenry 1740:Powers 1730:Finite 1709:JDoorj 1688:Powers 1570:JDoorj 1144:Powers 1134:(talk) 1111:Powers 1098:Jkelly 1068:Powers 1030:WP:CSD 986:attend 745:anyone 597:accept 547:Boheme 486:ed g2s 420:Powers 370:Powers 5624:Anomo 5253:Ragib 5122:: --> 5118:: --> 5114:: --> 4827:Hello 4599:there 4170:there 3919:Bully 3881:Felix 3877:Felix 3705:Never 3613:"Hi" 3556:juice 3551:Mango 3505:Anomo 3278:from 3169:Anomo 2979:care. 2873:WP:AN 2829:Anomo 2699:Anomo 2549:never 2416:Sir, 2366:and 2316:Angus 1909:WP:AE 1796:Watch 1784:Anomo 1624:Anomo 1412:Danny 1334:Chris 1238:Rouge 1052:juice 1047:Mango 999:mnemo 990:GEL06 824:least 786:least 663:still 218:NOTE: 16:< 5669:help 5241:and 5028:!? 4975:Meh. 4869:. -- 4861:See 4769:and 4767:WP:V 4699:". 4660:CAIR 4607:talk 4580:chat 4340:and 4338:WP:V 4270:". 4231:CAIR 4178:talk 4151:chat 3708:mind 3578:Dude 3573:Koji 3568:here 3566:See 3389:Dude 3384:Koji 3375:this 3288:Utah 3226:Dude 3221:Koji 3068:-- ' 3055:. 3040:and 2853:Hi, 2803:The 2774:talk 2723:Hi, 2673:The 2644:talk 2275:Talk 2246:Talk 2083:and 2081:Nana 2041:talk 1976:talk 1926:talk 1911:and 1845:SPUI 1720:Talk 1610:Tito 1581:Talk 1020:El_C 988:the 774:here 707:Perl 698:Perl 684:here 655:this 651:Here 639:this 631:this 578:Perl 490:talk 387:Adam 383:need 298:blis 5646:). 5583:hi 5496:RN' 5373:wcf 5355:wcf 5259:web 4999:ONE 4993:THE 4964:Bla 4865:or 4808:at 4761:Is 4578:-- 4436:-- 4428:or 4379:at 4332:Is 4149:-- 3990:-- 3982:or 3721:now 3570:.-- 3269:née 3028:). 3022:. 2573:Ian 2307:KRW 2297:by 2157:ANI 2085:NRG 1290:hey 937:or 294:nae 5660:: 5658:}} 5654:{{ 5622:? 5598:-- 5486:FL 5303:. 5261:. 4920:". 4643:) 4613:) 4609:- 4541:| 4514:| 4214:) 4184:) 4180:- 4112:| 4085:| 3748:-- 3723:.( 3712:It 3710:. 3681:-- 3479:-- 3402:. 3381:-- 3310:-- 3286:, 3267:, 3183:\ 3115:. 2959:-- 2859:jd 2729:jd 2580:/t 2575:¹³ 2273:| 2244:| 2230:. 2226:, 1982:) 1978:- 1932:) 1928:- 1904:}} 1898:{{ 1894:}} 1888:{{ 1874:, 1867:, 1855:, 1851:, 1765:-- 1614:xd 1606:is 1204:" 1201:" 1184:" 1128:-- 1032:I3 1018:. 910:-- 878:. 867:. 488:• 452:\ 333:\ 262:-- 145:| 96:→ 66:← 5671:) 5667:( 5491:a 5484:' 5458:, 5415:, 5335:. 4996:r 4990:o 4955:( 4943:. 4819:) 4773:? 4697:) 4641:T 4639:( 4605:( 4390:) 4344:? 4268:) 4212:T 4210:( 4176:( 3761:k 3756:a 3751:J 3727:) 3725:? 3718:s 3694:k 3689:a 3684:J 3527:C 3524:- 3521:T 3518:- 3494:C 3491:- 3488:T 3485:- 2782:| 2779:e 2776:| 2772:| 2652:| 2649:e 2646:| 2642:| 2188:@ 2111:⌡ 2107:⌠ 2098:⌡ 2094:⌠ 2071:⌡ 2067:⌠ 2043:) 2039:( 1974:( 1924:( 1717:m 1713:a 1578:m 1574:a 1509:— 1467:— 1248:( 1226:e 1219:R 947:. 542:e 537:i 532:V 438:r 434:e 410:r 406:e 350:r 346:e 296:' 52:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index