Knowledge

User talk:Jjhake

Source šŸ“

2903:
charged with the security of the skies for the United States, collected 147 flying saucer reports at its Technical Intelligence Division of the Air Materiel Command at Wright Field in Dayton, Ohio. On December 30, 1947, the order was given to begin a project to study the phenomenon, and an incident on January 7, 1948, reinforced the propriety of Air Force participation. On that date a large number of people spotted a UFO in proximity to Godman Air Force Base, near Louisville and Fort Knox, Kentucky. When three F-51 planes, led by Captain Thomas Mantell, went to check out the reports, Mantellā€™s plane crashed after he reported that he was at an altitude of 22,000 feet. Although investigators concluded that he had blacked out from lack of oxygen, speculation persisted that Mantell had been shot down by an extraterrestrial spacecraft. While it is now believed that Mantell was chasing a Skyhook balloon outfitted with a camera (later used for secret reconnaissance over Iron Curtain countries), the more colorful and exciting extraterrestrial rumors were hard to quash. This was only the beginning of many hard lessons concerning the UFO phenomenon. The Air Force would investigate this and a growing number of UFO reports through Project Sign, set up on January 22, 1948; Project Grudge, set up on December 16, 1948; and finally Project Blue Book, set up in March 1952, and continuing for 17 years.
2824:
universe, but also finding an extraterrestrial origin of UFO's unlikely based on engineering considerations." There's two other interesting things connected to this. One is that Lipp is one of a small team of engineers who helped launch the civil and military satellite reconnaissance programs during the Cold War. As you can imagine this was highly secret. If I wanted to distract the Soviets from such a program, wouldn't it make sense to popularize UFO reports to hide the true nature of the program? Just a thought. Anyway, the other interesting thing about Lipp's appendix is it turns out a lot of UFO mythos comes out of this report. I won't go into that right now, because the sourcing is somewhat weak, but the most notable example in the literature is the idea that nuclear testing on Earth attracted the attention of UFOs. Lipp was the first person to publish this idea. Lots more to say, but I wanted to at least create the biography so that we can add Lipp and his notable Appendix in the Project Sign section of your article. Of course, you are welcome to take this and do it yourself as you see fit. Just sharing where I am at this point.
2922:
being, the extraterrestrial hypothesis lost ground in the Air Force, but Project Signā€™s final report still left open the possibility that the UFO phenomenon might be something extraordinary and extraterrestrial. However, because it lacked the facts for an objective assessment, the study labeled the ideas of extraterrestrial space ships or atomic-powered aircraft "largely conjecture." In an appendix to the report on "the likelihood of a visit from other worlds as an engineering problem," James E. Lipp of the Rand Corporation placed thousand-to-one odds against the existence of higher life forms in our solar system and concluded that although space travelers from neighboring stars were much more likely than spaceships from Mars, this would require propulsion systems as yet unconceived on Earth. Visits from space were possible, he concluded, but they were "very improbable," and the actions attributed to flying saucers in 1947 and 1948 "seem inconsistent with the requirements for space travel."
2071:
members say they have faced pushback from different corners and seen witnesses drop out. Bolstering the transparency effort is a bipartisan charge on the other side of the Capitol led by Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, who has pushed legislation that would lead to the declassification of documents on the matter. The bill would amend the annual defense authorization to mandate government agencies to collect and submit records on UFOs to a review board within 300 days. ā€œThe American public has a right to learn about technologies of unknown origins, non-human intelligence, and unexplainable phenomena,ā€ Schumer said of the legislation in a release. ā€œWe are not only working to declassify what the government has previously learned about these phenomena but to create a pipeline for future research to be made public.ā€
1268:, is a great example (in my opinion) of writing about collective trauma. Anyway, I appreciate your thoughts and input. Sadly, I suspect that the American fascination with UFOs and such is only going to increase. I'd love to see people come to understand it all better together given the heightened sensationalism of the Grusch claims and some more scholarly attention to it. However, I'm afraid that we won't learn much and that the sensationalism will just keep escalating with future instances in future years. But regardless, I've got a lot of interests, and I will take your suggestions to heart with editing in other areas as well so that I don't get "stuck in a rut" over this topic. Thanks again. 1372:, not the film. That doesn't really matter to be honest, because you can easily argue that elements of the book make their way to the film in some way or another, so that's not a serious problem. The issue is her interpretation of this passage of the book. She writes: " is part of a public relations effort by which the government hopes to acclimate humans to the reality of extraterrestrials". Well, I don't think that's actually what happened. The project in the book was intended to gauge and test the reaction of the public to aliens 848: 1524: 1755:"for the sarcasm no doubt showing up in some of my comments here this morning" as I communicated my concern that "this topic is most obviously the domain of artists, film makers and literary voices as well as historians and religious studies scholars" and that "it's sad to see such voices chopped out when they write specifically in response to this Grusch incident". Looking over your two examples is very helpful to me, however, as I look at how the policy works and is enforced. Appreciated. 754: 674: 387: 1691:
in the article ā€œrelevantā€ above another section to clearly imply that what was below was irrelevant. He did this without any comment in the talk page and then reports me for personal attacks (which I acknowledge and will stop doing). I seriously hope that the mods like you will look at his actions as well which involve terms like ā€œappalledā€ in talk page comments and section titles like ā€œrelevantā€ in the article to subtly ridicule and intimidate.
2938:
after graduating with a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago in 1935. In 1956 he would go on to become the associate director of the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, and 4 years later he became chairman of the Astronomy Department at Northwestern University. The year 1949 marked the beginning of a lifelong association with the UFO problem, culminating with his founding of the Center for UFO Studies in 1973.
2930:
UFO reports were misidentifications, hoaxes, or hallucinations." Project Grudge shifted the focus from explaining an unusual phenomenon in the atmosphere as something real to explaining it as illusion. A Saturday Evening Post article stated the new Air Force philosophy, backed up by Nobel Prize-winning chemist Irving Langmuir, a Project Sign consultant, whose advice to the Air Force on UFOs was to "Forget it!"
3590: 2250: 1969:
Barack Obama (quite well, I must say), uses a binaural beats app on his phone to "time travel" (in some sense, I think) to the past to talk about UFOs with Dwight D. Eisenhower and an official representative of the aliens, who if I'm not mistaken seems to resemble Jesus Christ. It's one of the weirdest films I've seen in years, so it's worth checking out, just as long as you leave your brain at the door.
3489: 144: 882: 747: 1767:. Despite beginning your Knowledge 'career' in 2004, you keep claiming that you are a newbie (I can list the diffs if you insist, but your user page makes the same claim). You have made over 3100 edits, so please recognize that you are not a newbie. Continuing to use that claim as an explanation/shield/whatever for your edits is not tenable. I write this because you seem to be 287: 3151:
saw some documentary evidence and got some specific information about locations and program names and participants. Sticking to the specifics in the words given by Grusch and repeated in the best sources is the main thing to do. Eventually, most all commentary of any kind will get removed from the article unless any documentary presence ever shows up.
2212:. Regarding Frevor, it would be fine to add a source with a more specific title for his rank. I'm not sure, but I would guess that he was both a pilot and a squadron commander or something along those lines. I'll keep it in mind. However, there is likely a better article space for more info on Frevor than in the article about Grusch specifically. 1866:
articles. So, I have reverted the article to the version just prior to the copy right violations. Please don't do this anymore. Repeated instances can lead to being blocked and ultimately banned. And I don't want to see that happen. Also, please remove any material that you have copy and pasted into any articles. This will be very helpful. ---
3428: 261:, and I'm looking for other FACs on the current list where I can possibly be helpful and learn more. It's quite the process, and there is a lot to learn. If you see anything in my comments through the FAC process that I don't seem to be understanding, any clarifications or suggested redirections to me would be appreciated. 363:
admins or DYK team leaders closing the discussion and leaving an edit summary of "Promoted to X preparation area". Watching the approved page might not accomplish much because the edit summaries not terribly explicit and the page is so cluttered. I'll watch your DYK, too, and ping you when I see it get promoted! ~
1017:
helpful given that we are so limited in our abilities to see the real needs of others and to help them toward those needs by use of "law and order" to enforce moral conduct. There is more discussion of natural law theory by Hart here as well on "For Now I Know in Part - A Visit with David Bentley Hart" at the
3422:
Iā€™m reaching out as part of a Cornell University academic study investigating the potential for user-facing tools to help improve discussion quality within Knowledge discussion spaces (such as talk pages, noticeboards, etc.). We chose to reach out to you because you have been highly active on various
2929:
When Project Grudge replaced Project Sign at the end of 1948, it had a less open-minded strategy. In the words of the historian David Jacobs, "New staff people replaced many of the old personnel who had leaned toward the extraterrestrial hypothesis. In the future, Sign personnel would assume that all
1795:
before going much further. You clearly have a high level of interest in the Grusch page, and that's cool. But please do not let that interest devolve into disruptive editing, which I fear is becoming a real possibility. Such editing could lead to a topic ban or worse, and absolutely no one wants that
3337:
Thanks for the note. A strong source with relevant points about security clearances and public medical history seems likely to be okay for a focused and minor point within the article. However, it is outside my realm of familiarity. I'll look over the Knowledge policies that you linked and raise the
3150:
Iā€™ve lost many arguments with jps, and several other editors very often jump in and back him up. Getting to the main point, the gist of what Iā€™ve seen Grusch claim is that he and a few others spent four years interviewing about 40 witnesses some of whom had first-hand experience and from whom Grusch
2921:
Page 143: The extraterrestrial hypothesis first emerged officially in Project Sign, where an "Estimate of the Situation" in late 1948 concluded that the UFOs were of extraterrestrial origin. But General Hoyt S. Vandenburg disagreed, and the report was returned, declassified, and burned. For the time
2070:
The Oversight hearing next week will feature David Grusch, a former intelligence employee who claimed in June that the government had a secret UFO recovery program that found a ā€œpartially intact craft of non-human remains.ā€ While at least one Democrat has helped Republican colleagues push the issue,
1236:
Therefore it is most likely an illusion, currently covered by the press, and rogue intelligence officials failing to report classified SAP programs to Congress, also covered by the press. So, the real reason that Congress is upset is the failure to inform Congress about classified data and programs.
1170:
With the one article that I nominated in the past, I implemented all of the suggestions that several other much more experienced editors suggested in the course of their reviews. One of them commented in another location and it was all very confusing and labor intensive, but I learned a lot. Anyway,
450:
Well, now you are tempting me.Ā :) If I get Hart's article to FA status, the image will be the one at the top which is Hart with a coffee mug in hand (no dog). So I might give this new DYK hook with the image included a try later this evening. Is the best way simply to update the current DYK with the
428:
Absolutely no problem getting my attention and I appreciate you asking! If I'm being honest, people love dogs and that would get the DYK fact more views. However, if you're not inclined to do the work, why worry about that? I think I saw that you're working towards FA for the article, so people will
2943:
Wow! What a treasure trove of a historical scholar! Thank you for sharing. There is no need at all, obviously, for me to take the lead with continued work. Please share yourself if at all inclined. Iā€™ll certainly circle back and include this soon if you donā€™t. I also want to read some of his books.
2902:
Page 141:...The media and science fiction magazines were one thing, but ironically in view of subsequent history, it was only when the U.S. Air Force decided to investigate the flying saucer reports that the extraterrestrial hypothesis was recognized at an official level. During 1947 the Air Force,
2823:
document attached to the report. This is very interesting on several different levels. On the one hand, Mark Wade summarizes it as follows: "In 1948 provided Appendix D to the report closing out USAF UFO Project Sign, making one of the first calculations of the number of inhabited planets in the
2757:
Sorry, I got distracted by many other shiny things. Ape see nice object, ape like. Anyway, back to your outline: I was originally interested in adding material about Project Sign and Grudge way back during the Grusch article development spurt. I even downloaded a book to do it. But I need to go
1860:
Inspired by the development of science fiction fan clubs and newsletters in the 1930s and ā€™40s, enthusiasts beginning in the early ā€™50s organized local saucer clubs where members could meet to discuss the latest developments. By the end of the decade, some had grown into vibrant organizations, with
1690:
Thanks for the note. My use of ā€œridiculousā€ and ā€œfan the flamesā€ is personal language that is against policy. I would consider my serious concerns about the narrow use of strong secondary sources and academic disciplines to be legitimate, however. The editor to whom I was responding names a section
3246:
That is a great opinion piece. Just reread it. Even though an opinion piece, I think there are a few bits of info worth including in several articles indeed (as the position of the author). Iā€™ll get work on some. At any rate, Iā€™m sure that some news stories are going to start connecting some these
3231:
That's hysterical! We'll have to rename my talk page the one-stop shop for fringe-science related article editing. What a lovely reputation I'm getting. But this source that you shared is fantastic and does need to go into a whole long list of articles. I'm genuinely fascinated by American history
3058:
Yes, Iā€™m glad to help. My user account may have more freedoms because of how many years and edits Iā€™ve made. Iā€™m not entirely sure. However, anyone can create a draft I am pretty sure. When you type in a term to search for on Knowledge, it will ask you if you want to start a new page or a draft if
1968:
is not a particularly bad writer or director. What I think you'll find interesting, is that the film is a fictionalized account of the modern UFO mythos that attempts to explain it in contemporaneous terms using what can only be described as hilarious plot points. For example, an actor portraying
1224:
It seems your goal is to record what is happening now for the benefit of future historians and using Knowledge as a vehicle for doing that. This is a laudable goal. And in regards to this Grusch article I am wondering if it is worth your valuable training and experience to put so much effort into
1016:
As I recall, Hart has talked about natural law theory in a couple of interviews but has not written about it from what I can remember seeing. From what it said in one interview with Tony Golsby-Smith (I think), Hart doesn't really disagree with natural law theory but he also does not find it that
2937:
Project Grudge did, however, take one step that would be of profound importance to UFO history. It hired J. Allen Hynek (Fig. 5.2), an astronomy professor at nearby Ohio State University, to examine possible astronomical explanations for UFOs. Hynek (1910-1986) had come to Ohio State immediately
1240:
I don't know exactly what type of articles will best be served by your training and experience. Well, one that comes to mind is Artificial Intelligence (fondly known as AI), which is causing serious concern. Another is the work behind developing manned missions to Mars and that planet's eventual
1228:
I'm thinking it would be better to apply your talents to articles that are more mainstream and have a potential to impact the direction of our nation and the nations of the world. I don't think an article such as this and the other related article you recently edited will have such an impact. It
2507:
Thanks. Of course, Iā€™d say to pick up on any specific area that you find interesting and already have read the most sources about. Itā€™s a massive and messy topic. One topic would be the list of reasons why UAPs are repeatedly called a national security problem by various officials, but whatever
2466:
article is looking at the history with all factors in view at once, as historians, sociologists, and journalists do. It is therefore able to incorporate the work of journalists such as Garrett Graff and historians such as Greg Eghigian, for example, who look at the full story of U.S. government
2002:
It wasnā€™t as bad as it could have been. It would have been better if the editing was a bit tighter and they removed some of the more extraneous scenes. The ending was a bit sudden as well. All in all the acting was good. I think the best improvement they could have made was to strip away the
1380:
would be too great. So she kind of got that wrong. She goes on to say, "This minor scene in the movie provides an interesting framework for interpreting the cultural development of the alien abduction phenomenon, which has rested on the idea that humans can access suppressed memories through
362:
A pleasure working with you, especially since I'm glad someone gave DBH a decent article! Generallyā€“not always, but like 90% of the time in my experienceā€“watching the template you created is more than sufficient and you'll notice when the template is promoted to a prep/queue based on one of the
1865:
These are word for word copyright violations. And as I look at the text just from that edit there seems to be more that has been copy and pasted into this article. All the material that has been copy and pasted into this article has to be reverted. This includes text copy and pasted from other
1846:
Inspired by the development of science fiction fan clubs and newsletters in the 1930s and 1940s, UFO enthusiasts in the early 1950s started to organize local "saucer clubs" to collect and discuss the latest developments. By the end of the decade, some had grown into vibrant organizations, with
413:
Sorry for the multiple messages here, but I'm thinking it's best to keep it simple and about the New Testament and fairies as it is. Roland will be a fun surprise for those new to Hart who follow the DYK link to read more... (And I don't think I've got the time to consider this any time soon.)
3426:
The study centers around a prototype tool, ConvoWizard, which is designed to warn Knowledge editors when a discussion they are replying to is getting tense and at risk of derailing into personal attacks or incivility. More information about ConvoWizard and the study can be found at our
2574:
Anyone know of good sources that noted and commented on how Charles McCullough (President Obamaā€™s former Intelligence Community Inspector General who represented Grusch in his Intelligence Community Inspector General complaint) was seated directly behind Grusch in the Congressional
2492:
I'll take a look later. I do better when I have a specific task at hand, so if you can delegate by pointing out a tiny area that needs work, that might help motivate me to participate. I'm just more effective when I can zero in on something small. I like the surgical approach.
392:. Do you think this would be an improvement and worth doing? I don't know how to do it when there is already one suggestion in place (which I also like). One idea would be to reference Roland as a bodhisattva who once dwelled in the Tuį¹£ita Heaven as currently cited in the 2680:
So it looks like after that press release, Mick West popularized the claim that Compass Rose had dropped Grusch as a client. But the rumor (based on the above) is that McCullough left the firm to represent Grusch. We need sources, of course, but there arenā€™t any.
1065:
Nowhere near ready or stable for a review. I would recommend withdrawing this submission and resubmitting in another month. I say this as a reviewer with many articles under my belt. I would fail this in a minute. The stability criterion is essential.
2695:
Yes, there is one good source that still calls him the attorney for Grusch and the two hour video of him sitting right behind Grusch during the Congressional hearings. But no media commentary or clarity. Oh well. More sustained confusion in an odd case.
3374:
Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Knowledge with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Knowledge's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your
3285:
Knowledge simply exists to accurately reflect whatever the majority of excellent secondary sources say. I think that the article does that, but there is always room to improve. Let me know what facts from what sources are missing in your estimation.
2367: 1127:
One other thing to keep in mind: the bot said you have zero reviews, and one GA. I think you should try your hand at reviewing other articles in the queue in the interim as it will give you a better handle on how far this article needs to go.
1220:
Hello. At this moment, I am not able to get over the talk page of the current article we are both working on. But I want to say a few words in general about the historic value of this article compared to other, more down to earth, articles.
478:
preceding it. I can take care of the formatting on the sourcing and all the rest, that way you can see how it works. If you want to give it a try yourself, just check out some of the other noms currently approved and see how they did it! ~
3269:
This is the reason why Knowledge is rapidly loosing interest. By the bias remarks on a subject like David Grusch. A completely one sided article. Why did you not focus on David high ranking status and employment and others on the stand??
1232:
It may be such reports like Grush's are simply the manifestations of past unacknowledged personal trauma that resides in the unconscious. And It is Ross Douthat who seems to say this in his opinion piece when referencing Carl Jung.
2370:. Although it's not that important right now, I think you will need to work on that title in the future. But, you know what, I hope you push full-steam ahead on this and bring it to featured article status. I know you can do it. 3165:
It must be extremely frustrating working with such biased editors who ignore their own rules for neutrality. Reading that Grusch entry, they were bending over backwards and twisting to rationalize their biased editorial decisions.
1376:. The problem was that the test participants reacted with xenophobia, providing one of the major reasons why the government (in the book/film) decided to keep the subsequent discovery of the monolith secret. They believed the 2619:
Oh, I thought you were talking about something else. If you listen to the latest Corbell podcast, he talks about how he (or a politician, it isnā€™t clear) had to lobby to get McCullough a seat behind Grusch. Give it a listen.
897: 607:
Btw, would it be bad form for me to start implementing some of the recommendations from SchroCat? Some of them look clear and great to me, but I don't want to make edits on the article if that is considered unhelpful at this
398:
article. I'm not inclined to go through the extra work, but if you thought that this idea for including an image was a substantial improvement (and if you could spell out the steps that I should take), I could give it a try.
523:, but I'm wondering if it is okay to have it in both places at the same time (FAC and DYK)? This is my first time with either process, and any advice would be great regarding how best for me to communicate, etc. Thank you. 1463:. Nolan has said that this is the case publicly since 2019 when Pasulka's book came out. Taylor has not been public about it to my knowledge, but Ryan Bledsoe evidently shared this on Twitter once (and the facts line up). 1185:
I gotcha, but all I'm trying to say is that my assumption was wrong. You can be a good article writer without ever having touched a review. It's not something I had ever considered, so it was surprising to me to see.
1558:
Thanks. Kind of you. I need to let the historical and sociological and religious scholarship catch up to this Grusch stuff. I do need to take a break as only a few secondary sources are making the connections so far.
1259:
I would guess that the growing American fascination with UFOs and aliens (for well over half a century now) has to do with both unacknowledged personal and collective trauma. One of my personal favorite authors is
2648:
That confused me as well! But I think a few weeks back one of the podcasts cleared this discrepancy up. Not sure if it was Mick West or John Greenewald, but maybe McCullough is representing him outside the firm?
1241:
colonization. There is also the technologies being developed to ameliorate the impact of Global Climate Change, such as fusion reaction, which seems to be an interesting field of historical value all on its own.
2467:
investigations with all of the factors in view (such political, cultural, national security, etc.). They both have many articles and interviews available with strong reliable sources as well as books coming out
1831:
Hello. Are you familiar with Knowledge's policies regarding copying copyrighted material and placing this material into Knowledge articles? Let me give an instance where I see this and it seems there are more:
3534: 2272: 2711: 520: 258: 2634:
Yes, I did hear that. It just seems like some media should include such details. Last thing reported publicly was that McCullough no longer represented Grusch, but now itā€™s clear that he continues to.
3518:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 814: 3059:
what you searched for did not already exist. I can give some step by step recommendations and point up resources for this on Knowledge as well that are very helpful. Would more info like that help?
1881:
Thank you. Iā€™ve been very careful about that typically but pulled that long historical section together from old notes carelessly. Iā€™ll rewrite it with attention to proper quotations and summaries.
2990: 2527: 2463: 2441: 3702:
and seeing that I should avoid edits in these cases do to personal relationships, and I'll be sure to comply with these expectations moving forward. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
1344:
Yes, that was the first time Iā€™d heard of it. Iā€™m fascinated by the wide range of studies and approaches, from the NASA team to several religious studies scholars and some academic historians.
2384:
Thank you! That would take a whole lot of help from others. Iā€™d be thrilled to get the input in developing it. Do you have ideas for improving the article title? It is a rather long one. šŸ˜…
1779:, and claiming to be a newbie will not excuse that. Furthermore, I and other editors have recently provided you with direct links to many Knowledge policies and guidelines (PAGs), including 2333:
from the Black Vault. It's pretty good. The end of the podcast has some surprises, particularly John's cogent argument as to why an alleged coverup might be justified (or rationalized).
2600:
Itā€™s obvious in the photos and in a few places online but no good sources point it out. This one news story from five days ago does call Charles McCullough the acting attorney for Grusch:
2003:
underlying drama (which was added to move the plot along) and just get down to brass tacks with extended dialogue and discussion. This could have become a cult classic if they did that.
1705:
Btw, you mention having notified me of this issue in the past, but I canā€™t find it. Can you kindly point me to it as Iā€™d like to make sure that Iā€™m aware of my own patterns. Thank you.
3503: 2993:(although it is so rich that it will not be easy). Separately, I just worked in material from the second longer quoted section. Such a strong source and great content. Thanks again. 3612: 1377: 798: 341: 300: 2437: 817:
after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
215: 1099:
Yes, exactly. The bot will then remove it from the listing within 24 hours. "To withdraw a nomination, remove the {{GA nominee}} template from the article talk page."
1811:
Thanks. Helpful. I've got a lot of edits over years but always on very dull topics and not popular, so I'm genuinely learning a lot on this more high profile article.
1237:
I think the vast majority of Congressmen do not believe we are storing extraterrestrial vehicles and bodies. So how much of an impact can this story have in the end?
1312:
Iā€™ve not really researched this topic much before, but as I read a little more, itā€™s astonishing what a lasting place it has in U.S. history. Iā€™m currently reading
2429: 1225:
this particular article. I am pretty sure this will be merely a blip in our nation's and the world's history when looking back decades or a century from now.
1861:
national, even international followings and monthly newsletters which actively solicited contributions from members about their own sightings and theories.
1847:
national, even international followings and monthly newsletters which actively solicited contributions from members about their own sightings and theories.
73: 1409:
I'm still reading it! Just wanted to point out something that annoyed me. I mean, I can see her POV, but she's pushing the boundaries of facts here.
1898:. I hope you understand these violations were much more than failing to quote a historian. I wouldn't have reverted the page if it were only that. --- 163:
within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.
2025: 214:
Thank you for sharing ideas for improvements in the peer review space. I have had it listed for peer review for a few months now I think, with just
1156:
On the other hand, I only just noticed for the first time, that we have many prolific GA writers who have 0 reviews. I actually didn't know this.
3618: 2288: 939: 839: 665: 1540:. "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." Don't give up now. Take a break and come back to it. Your efforts are truly appreciated. 1381:
hypnotic regression." Yeah, no. That's just silly; it's creative writing on her part. There is literally no connection between the two ideas.
3441:
If you have any questions or thoughts about the study, our team is happy to discuss! You may direct such comments to me or to my collaborator,
1081:
Thank you. To withdraw it, do I simply delete the tag at the top of the talk page, or is there another process I should track down and follow?
1964:(2020) is one of these films. I just watched it on Amazon, but I'm sure it is available elsewhere. It is very entertaining in some sense, as 997:" ethics in Hart's books? (Quotations and page numbers would be extremely helpful.) My intention of my request for help is for improvement of 2472: 2433: 2209: 1772: 1537: 760: 79: 3557: 3167: 938:
and her story of protest against discrimination by singing on Easter Sunday 9 April 1939 on the Main page yesterday. Impressions of Easter
2819:. He was instrumental for helping shoot down the extraterrestrial hypothesis in the so-called "Appendix D" letter, a formerly classified 1573: 451:
new hook text, the image, and the new source info? If so, I'll likely go for it this evening and give you an FYI here should I manage it.
1229:
seems these types of events will interest only hobbyists and true believers. And true believers do not run the world for the most part.
345: 38: 3578: 2238: 572:
Mention is fine, but could you just drop the "veteran" thing, please. The critic is much more of a veteran, and much more prolific. --
138: 1441:
several years ago, but I listen to so many different podcasts, I completely forgot about it. I'm going to go back and listen to it.
3076: 2428:
and the unusual page history. This may give you additional insight into what needs to be done. Second thing I would do is take at
3456: 2522:
Understood. But, consider creating a to-do list; you can bring in other editors and ask them for help with specific subtopics.
3553: 384:
Someone else had idea the of pitching a second idea for Hart's DYK nomination that would include this image of him with Roland
3210: 1593:
Kind of you. This was fun to read. You have me figured out. The author had a lot of mixed feelings and articulated them well.
319:
Thank you! I've just added two citations that are much more direct on the nominations page. Glad that it might be considered.
3699: 2851: 2459: 2425: 24: 3180:
It's a topic that causes a lot of confusion and inconsistency. A basic rule of Knowledge is not to cover sensational news.
2838:
Update: finally found the source I was talking about. I'll add it here in case you want to use it and add it before I do:
2544:
Thatā€™s very cool. Iā€™ve not seen a to-do list used before except with review templates. Thanks. Iā€™ll give it some thought.
1423:
Yes, Iā€™m not finished either, and good point about some sloppiness in her part. Shame on those Oxford UP editors as well.
1369: 1048: 1006: 155:
for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a
68: 3640: 3527: 3390: 3312:
Doesn't this violate descrimation policy of wikipedia to write this about claims made by a veteran suffering from PTSD?
2304: 2110:
Please watch this. this guy is a top security geopolitics analyst. extremely smart and an absolute expert on the topic.
1776: 1608: 2398:
As you can probably imagine, I have a lot of ideas simmering on the burner. I will get back to you in about 12 hours.
1461:
Launch Fever: An entrepreneur's journey into the secrets of launching rockets, a new business and living a happier life
998: 3539: 3452: 3442: 2199: 2181: 2141: 2076: 152: 59: 3221: 2989:
One of us will need to circle back and figure out how to break down the first longer quoted passage from Steven Dick
3315: 2458:
Thank you. Helpful comparison points and shorter name. I've moved the page to the more concise name. As an article,
3327: 3275: 3001: 1836: 960: 818: 804: 160: 97: 92: 2468: 3306:
Hi, I'm a new user and wasn't able to comment on talk page for David Grusch, but I noticed this in the article:
2194:
is an Air Force veteran who worked with the Pentagon team charged with investigating unexplained flying objects
1171:
Iā€™d love to try doing some reviews as a way to mature and learn more as an editor on here. It is a goal I have.
106: 3662: 3359: 2773:
Thatā€™s great! I plan to circle back regularly as well and to add more about other early elements of the story.
3171: 2478:
Thanks for the help with the title, and I hope that you and many others might start to help with the article.
1044: 1002: 989:
Hi Jjhake, I have noticed that you have interest in the work of David Bentley Hart. I have enjoyed modifying
3438:
to sign up and install ConvoWizard. Of course, if you are not interested, feel free to ignore this message.
3141: 3116: 3095: 3048: 2195: 2177: 2137: 2072: 1852: 801:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 148: 123: 3271: 3125:
Hi there, I was wondering if you would kindly give your opinion regarding the following. much apprecialted.
3674: 2886:
Since you are taking the lead on this, I'll just add the material here and you can use it in the article.
2523: 1801: 1728: 1680: 972: 951: 943: 868: 847: 725: 697: 577: 542: 237: 197: 3217: 2603: 2508:
detail jumps out at you is where Iā€™d hope that youā€™d find improvements to make in filling out the story.
1244:
Anyway, these are just some thoughts. Expertise in all disciplines are needed on Knowledge. Regards, ----
643:
Not sure if it's helpful, but just an FYI, that Volunteer Response Team verification is now in place for
3515: 3323: 1917: 1903: 1871: 1768: 1523: 1364: 1249: 855: 765: 681: 189: 3214:
We could probably add this to about half a dozen articles. That's why I'm putting it on your talkpage.
3629:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.
3134: 3128: 2297:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.
2065: 777:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 706:
Excellent! And what a wonderful collection in your "Places and songs 2023"! Thank you for sharing. --
474:
If you do get around to it, add a comment immediately after the last one on the DYK nom template with
3670: 1965: 1616: 990: 298:
has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at
179: 2980: 2891: 2829: 2792: 2763: 2733: 2686: 2671: 2654: 2625: 2589: 2535: 2498: 2449: 2403: 2375: 2338: 2032: 2008: 1974: 1780: 1584: 1545: 1482: 1446: 1414: 1386: 1359: 1335: 1303: 1191: 1161: 1133: 1104: 1071: 964: 829: 394: 49: 3129:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:David_Grusch_UFO_whistleblower_claims#Credulity_thy_name_is_Daragahi
2996:
Finally, the note from page 142 about an illustration of a saucer-shaped UFO from a 1929 issue of
2171: 3666: 3137: 3112: 3044: 781: 772: 291: 134: 127: 111: 64: 3435: 3135:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:David_Grusch_UFO_whistleblower_claims#Wording_edit_for_the_summary
2086:
Yes, was just reading this. Very helpful to see David Grusch finally mentioned in a source like
789:
translator and proponent of the existence of fairiesĀ ā€“ engages in dialogues with his dog Roland
753: 386: 2132: 1984:
Wow. That does sound like a hysterical film. Iā€™m sure Iā€™d be entertained. Thanks for the note.
1029:
I might be entirely wrong about what you were asking about, but I hope this might be close. --
494:
Just gave it a shot and tagged you. Thanks for the continued encouragement and help with this.
3497: 3402: 2857: 2848: 1797: 1724: 1676: 1298:, incident is truly frightening after all these years. It's hard to know what to make of it. 1291: 968: 947: 910: 864: 721: 693: 673: 602: 573: 553: 538: 484: 434: 368: 309: 295: 248: 233: 232:
So sorry, I forgot you had it running at the same time. I'll look, later today or tomorrow. --
209: 193: 45: 1395:
Good points. Itā€™s a zany book, but itā€™s an introduction to a world that I didnā€™t know about.
1282:
I agree with what Steve Quinn wrote. Your talents are needed elsewhere. I was just reading
304:
and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
3636: 3546: 3511: 2300: 1913: 1899: 1867: 1245: 993:. May I be so brazenly and bluntly ask if you know of any discussion (usually critical) of " 558:
I mentioned you on the FAC page with some helpful feedback just received. Hope that's okay.
166: 108: 3526:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2972:
Still reading the source material. Will edit when I finish. Oh, and check your user page.
2126: 2121: 1719:
The link is embedded in the first word of my comment immediately above. Here it is again:
1675:) are personal attacks that are against policy and do nothing to improve article content. 1612: 935: 252: 175: 170: 2758:
back into my files to find it. When I can, I will attempt to add material your article.
644: 537:
no problem both at the same time - and the FAC is already on my user page as to-doĀ ;) --
3523: 2976: 2887: 2840: 2825: 2788: 2759: 2729: 2682: 2667: 2650: 2621: 2585: 2531: 2494: 2445: 2399: 2371: 2334: 2028: 2004: 1970: 1960: 1580: 1541: 1478: 1442: 1410: 1382: 1331: 1299: 1287: 1187: 1157: 1129: 1100: 1067: 825: 1926:
I'll "be with it" very much as I fix the violation that you kindly pointed out to me.
1737:
Thank you. I'm still learning a lot of the basics on this platform. Much appreciated.
3519: 3367: 2816: 1951: 1788: 1764: 1657: 1261: 786: 3589: 2865:
See Chapter 5: The UFO Controversy and the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis, pp. 137-168.
2249: 2208:
Thank you. Those facts about Grusch are already well represented and sourced in the
3397: 3363: 2820: 2176:
mentions David Frevor as retired Navy commander. the article right now says pilot.
1784: 906: 638: 514: 480: 445: 430: 379: 364: 335: 305: 3488: 3043:
I was wondering about how wikipedia articles are created, who can I ask for help?
692:
Sharing impressions from vacation on Madeira 20-30 March, pics now at 25 March. --
2368:
investigation and analysis of UFO reports by the United States federal government
3703: 3685: 3645: 3467: 3339: 3287: 3248: 3233: 3181: 3152: 3098: 3079: 3060: 3005: 2959: 2945: 2802: 2774: 2715: 2697: 2635: 2606: 2545: 2509: 2479: 2385: 2349: 2309: 2213: 2152: 2091: 2043: 1985: 1927: 1882: 1812: 1738: 1706: 1692: 1626: 1611:
of the UFO scene from the 50s through the 90s (if you haven't already read it).
1594: 1560: 1464: 1456: 1424: 1396: 1345: 1317: 1295: 1269: 1172: 1143: 1114: 1082: 1030: 921: 881: 746: 707: 648: 609: 587: 559: 524: 495: 452: 415: 400: 349: 320: 262: 219: 20: 2264:
On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
3604:
On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
3316:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:English_Wikipedia_non-discrimination_policy
3232:
and culture, and big money is a crazy factor (literally) almost every time...
2462:
is focused on methodologies for identification. It's a helpful focus, but the
2330: 1579:
was almost aligned with where you wanted to go. I'll keep an eye out for you.
1438: 1024: 808: 286: 2860: 1607:@Jjhake, for purely entertainment purposes, it sounds like you might enjoy 2348:
Listening now. Thank you. He's a remarkably reasonable and helpful voice.
1358:
I'm a bit concerned with attention to accuracy in the book. On page 143,
1895:
Hello again. I noticed your edit over at Unidentified Flying Object talk
1455:
Btw, in Pasulka's book, "James" is a pseudonym for Stanford immunologist
3530:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
896:
Your hook reached 23,025 views ( 959.4 per hour), making it one of the
218:
so far (which you'll see from user Z1720 which were brief but helpful).
3507:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1955: 110: 2910:
Page 142: An illustration of a saucer-shaped UFO from a 1929 issue of
2604:
https://qz.com/debunking-truth-uap-ufo-allegations-congress-1850682493
752: 1842:(one has to use the "find" search tool in the browser to get to it): 1751:
For the recored, before I was reprimanded this morning, I apologized
1660:. I do so again, for the final time, because Talk page comments like 920:
Thank you! And your photos are wonderful to follow. Blessed journey!
2664: 2113: 1950:
Normally, I don't really recommend bad films, but some people, like
3711: 3693: 3678: 3651: 3561: 3475: 3460: 3409: 3347: 3331: 3295: 3279: 3256: 3241: 3225: 3189: 3175: 3160: 3145: 3120: 3106: 3087: 3068: 3052: 3013: 2984: 2967: 2953: 2895: 2845:
Life on Other Worlds: The 20th-Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate
2833: 2810: 2796: 2782: 2767: 2737: 2723: 2705: 2690: 2675: 2658: 2643: 2629: 2614: 2593: 2553: 2539: 2517: 2502: 2487: 2453: 2407: 2393: 2379: 2357: 2342: 2315: 2221: 2203: 2185: 2160: 2145: 2099: 2080: 2066:
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/22/tim-burchett-ufos-00107708
2051: 2036: 2012: 1993: 1978: 1935: 1921: 1907: 1890: 1875: 1820: 1805: 1746: 1732: 1714: 1700: 1684: 1634: 1620: 1602: 1588: 1568: 1549: 1486: 1472: 1450: 1432: 1418: 1404: 1390: 1353: 1339: 1325: 1307: 1277: 1253: 1195: 1180: 1165: 1151: 1137: 1122: 1108: 1090: 1075: 1052: 1038: 1010: 976: 955: 929: 914: 872: 833: 729: 715: 701: 656: 617: 595: 581: 567: 546: 532: 503: 488: 460: 438: 423: 408: 372: 357: 328: 313: 270: 241: 227: 201: 183: 159:
under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
1459:
and "Tyler" is a pseudonym for Timothy (Tim) Taylor the author of
429:
probably get to see the dog photo on the main page soon enough! ~
385: 2118:
I've selected two important moments from the conversation below:
3543:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3434:
If this sounds like it might be interesting to you, you can use
3320: 3000:, sent me down a long rabbit hole surrounding some new material 2530:, it would be easier to point to specific areas that need work. 192:. I'll comment there, seeing that it looks great at a glance. -- 3533:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
3501:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
2172:
https://www.ft.com/content/5235af64-9646-4c50-8d7c-93f7f04f7bb6
1851:
Here is the text in the Boston Review article used as a source
112: 15: 3309:"Reporting on past psychiatric treatment received by Grusch" 3588: 2528:
investigation of UFO reports by the United States government
2464:
Investigation of UFO reports by the United States government
2442:
investigation of UFO reports by the United States government
2248: 2133:
https://twitter.com/matthew_pines/status/1682912062626844672
1477:
Cool beans, my dude. That's helpful. Thanks for the tips.
1763:
This will be my final note here (I hope), and I make it in
2526:
for a biography. I think if you created one of these for
2440:. Given all of that so far, I would shorten the title to 1625:
Ha! That does look like a good laugh break. Thanks again.
1330:
Neat. That was one of three books that Kean recommended.
188:
Congratulations! Towards FA, I recommend now to go for a
2666:
I know youā€™ve seen it, just wanted a complete timeline.
647:(which came about in some FAC work for this article). -- 344:
for the Hart article. Do you know if I would watch this
3514:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2973: 2424:
First thing I would do is look at the strangely titled
2127:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJJM4YydWkI&t=4285s
2122:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJJM4YydWkI&t=4654s
1896: 1840: 1752: 1720: 1669: 1661: 1653: 348:
page in order to see what date it might get setup for?
1673:
you entirely misrepresent the topic and fan the flames
2787:
Is it okay to edit your proposed outline/to do list?
2042:
Thanks. This sounds like a really constructive idea.
3415:
Invitation to Cornell study on Knowledge discussions
799:
Template:Did you know nominations/David Bentley Hart
797:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
3384: 3380: 2438:
Category:United States government responses to UFOs
3321:https://en.wikipedia.org/Discrimination#Disability 2728:Nice. I'll have more to say about this tomorrow. 2580:That's Corbell's claim from his latest episode of 2230:August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive 586:Yes, switched that out for "some FAC experience." 3466:Thank you! I set this up and will give it a try. 3379:To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with 3338:question on the talk page for input from others. 1835:Here is what appears to be what you wrote in the 3073:You should familiarize yourself with this first: 934:Thank you, - one more day added. I loved to see 27:, where you can send them messages and comments. 3372: 3354:I have sent you a note about a page you started 2958:Got a very basic start on it as you might see. 1656:I suggested that you familiarize yourself with 2914:foreshadowing the phenomenon two decades later 2432:. Finally, I would look at the categories of 3366:, while examining this page as a part of our 2430:list of investigations of UFOs by governments 8: 1001:. Thanks - and please do not feel obliged! 838: 664: 3247:crazy money dots more clearly before long. 3092:Then you will find basic instructions here: 1775:Talk page in a manner that is verging upon 1025:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NGXXyW24nA 3383:. Please remember to sign your reply with 3358:Hello, Jjhake. Thank you for your work on 1912:And no need to reply. Just be with it. --- 846: 837: 672: 663: 3661:Do you have an undisclosed connection to 1666:your ridiculously narrow-minded questions 769:was updated with a fact from the article 3684:Yes, where do I disclose my connection? 2584:. I don't think we can use it as a RS. 2663:Hereā€™s where they distanced themselves. 1368:, but the material in question is from 340:Thank you for all of the help with the 2573: 2289:Join the conversations on our talkpage 2058:just released new politico UAP article 1672: 1665: 645:File:David_Bentley_Hart_and_Roland.jpg 2434:Category:Government responses to UFOs 2329:I hope you had a chance to listen to 1773:David Grusch UFO whistleblower claims 1538:David Grusch UFO whistleblower claims 991:a page you have invested much time in 7: 3498:2023 Arbitration Committee elections 2975:One of your last edits didn't take. 2062:This can affect the entire article: 281:DYK nomination of David Bentley Hart 151:for comments about the article, and 3610:Interested in taking part? You can 3482:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message 3206:Rich people demanding pseudoscience 2270:Interested in taking part? You can 1437:I just realized; I listened to her 1216:Contemporary historical perspective 346:Template talk:Did you know/Approved 3448:Thank you for your consideration. 3429:research project page on meta-wiki 2524:Here's an example of one I created 14: 3393:tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) 3077:Deletion of articles on Knowledge 2114:https://twitter.com/matthew_pines 1530:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar 999:Draft:Manualism in moral theology 3487: 2801:Yes, sounds helpful! Please do. 1522: 880: 745: 285: 142: 39:Click here to start a new topic. 3537:and submit your choices on the 898:most viewed hooks of April 2023 813:, and the hook may be added to 720:(moved from an article talk) -- 3712:02:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 3700:Knowledge:Conflict of interest 3694:02:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 3679:23:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3410:11:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC) 3370:, had the following comments: 2847:. Cambridge University Press. 2460:Identification studies of UFOs 2426:Identification studies of UFOs 1954:and myself, get a kick out of 1: 3652:02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC) 3562:00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 3516:Knowledge arbitration process 3348:20:56, 7 September 2023 (UTC) 3332:02:23, 7 September 2023 (UTC) 3296:17:29, 1 September 2023 (UTC) 3280:16:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC) 296:Did You Know nominations page 36:Put new text under old text. 3570:March 2024 GAN backlog drive 2444:or something equally short. 3476:00:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC) 3461:17:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC) 3389:(Message delivered via the 3257:04:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC) 3242:17:57, 25 August 2023 (UTC) 3226:16:56, 25 August 2023 (UTC) 3190:01:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC) 3176:00:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC) 3014:21:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC) 2985:09:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC) 2968:22:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC) 2954:11:00, 20 August 2023 (UTC) 2896:10:51, 20 August 2023 (UTC) 2151:Thanks. Will check it out. 1374:before they were discovered 1316:by Pasulka from Oxford UP. 779:... that in a recent book, 153:Talk:David Bentley Hart/GA1 44:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 3730: 3607:Barnstars will be awarded. 3554:MediaWiki message delivery 3161:04:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC) 3146:00:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC) 3121:16:47, 5 August 2023 (UTC) 3107:02:50, 5 August 2023 (UTC) 3088:02:48, 5 August 2023 (UTC) 3069:02:29, 5 August 2023 (UTC) 3053:02:09, 5 August 2023 (UTC) 2834:23:59, 7 August 2023 (UTC) 2811:15:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC) 2797:10:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC) 2783:01:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC) 2768:23:11, 6 August 2023 (UTC) 2738:08:04, 4 August 2023 (UTC) 2724:11:33, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 2710:Took an initial shot at a 2706:09:52, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 2691:04:12, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 2676:04:07, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 2659:03:57, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 2644:03:45, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 2630:03:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 2615:03:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 2594:02:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 2554:02:19, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 2540:02:14, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 2518:02:10, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 2503:01:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 2488:11:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC) 2454:09:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC) 2408:11:40, 1 August 2023 (UTC) 2394:10:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC) 2380:08:33, 1 August 2023 (UTC) 2284:Other ways to participate: 2267:Barnstars will be awarded. 2260:August 2023 Backlog Drive: 1837:Unidentified flying object 1039:02:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC) 1011:09:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC) 977:16:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC) 956:17:18, 10 April 2023 (UTC) 915:19:47, 10 April 2023 (UTC) 740:DYK for David Bentley Hart 716:21:37, 31 March 2023 (UTC) 702:19:42, 31 March 2023 (UTC) 657:12:26, 17 March 2023 (UTC) 618:20:41, 17 March 2023 (UTC) 596:20:25, 17 March 2023 (UTC) 582:20:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC) 568:20:16, 17 March 2023 (UTC) 547:12:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC) 533:11:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC) 290:Hello! Your submission of 271:12:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC) 3628: 3600:March 2024 Backlog Drive: 3587: 2366:Hey good job on creating 2358:11:25, 31 July 2023 (UTC) 2343:10:39, 31 July 2023 (UTC) 2316:05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC) 2296: 2282: 2247: 2244:August 2023 Backlog Drive 2222:15:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC) 2204:15:35, 28 July 2023 (UTC) 2186:15:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC) 2161:02:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC) 2146:01:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC) 2100:00:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC) 2081:23:13, 22 July 2023 (UTC) 2052:06:33, 15 July 2023 (UTC) 2037:10:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC) 2026:For your consideration... 2013:22:23, 13 July 2023 (UTC) 1994:12:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC) 1979:10:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC) 1936:04:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC) 1922:04:24, 28 June 2023 (UTC) 1908:04:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC) 1891:03:45, 28 June 2023 (UTC) 1876:03:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC) 1821:19:30, 27 June 2023 (UTC) 1806:19:25, 27 June 2023 (UTC) 1791:. I really hope you will 1747:13:49, 27 June 2023 (UTC) 1733:13:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) 1715:13:28, 27 June 2023 (UTC) 1701:13:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC) 1685:13:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC) 1635:15:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC) 1621:15:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC) 1603:10:50, 28 June 2023 (UTC) 1589:10:34, 28 June 2023 (UTC) 1569:10:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC) 1550:08:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC) 1521: 1487:09:27, 25 June 2023 (UTC) 1473:12:09, 24 June 2023 (UTC) 1451:10:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC) 1433:10:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC) 1419:10:13, 24 June 2023 (UTC) 1405:10:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC) 1391:10:05, 24 June 2023 (UTC) 1354:11:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC) 1340:11:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC) 1326:11:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC) 1308:10:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC) 1278:02:32, 22 June 2023 (UTC) 1254:02:06, 22 June 2023 (UTC) 1196:10:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC) 1181:00:28, 22 June 2023 (UTC) 1166:00:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC) 1152:02:43, 18 June 2023 (UTC) 1138:00:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC) 1123:22:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC) 1109:22:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC) 1091:22:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC) 1076:22:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC) 930:14:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC) 886: 879: 873:14:23, 6 April 2023 (UTC) 854: 845: 834:00:02, 6 April 2023 (UTC) 730:14:16, 6 April 2023 (UTC) 680: 671: 521:this DBH article as a FAC 504:23:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC) 489:16:25, 8 March 2023 (UTC) 461:16:09, 8 March 2023 (UTC) 439:15:57, 8 March 2023 (UTC) 424:12:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC) 409:12:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC) 373:20:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC) 358:20:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC) 329:19:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC) 314:17:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC) 242:13:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC) 228:12:51, 5 March 2023 (UTC) 202:07:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC) 184:03:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC) 74:Be welcoming to newcomers 3663:Classical Academic Press 3584:March 2024 Backlog Drive 3579:Good article nominations 3551:to your user talk page. 3360:Irvin Charles McCullough 2239:Good article nominations 1958:science fiction films. 1362:refers to Clarke's film 1294:. The case file on the 963:is the 80th birthday of 3096:Help:Your first article 2191:also says about Grusch: 1142:Good point. Thank you. 1053:07:08, 3 May 2023 (UTC) 301:your nomination's entry 149:Talk:David Bentley Hart 3593: 3453:Jonathan at CornellNLP 3443:Cristian_at_CornellNLP 3377: 2998:Science Wonder Stories 2940: 2932: 2924: 2916: 2912:Science Wonder Stories 2905: 2253: 1863: 1849: 819:Did you know talk page 757: 390: 69:avoid personal attacks 3698:I'm reading over the 3592: 3512:Arbitration Committee 3495:Hello! Voting in the 3368:page curation process 2935: 2927: 2919: 2908: 2900: 2252: 1858: 1844: 1439:talk with Lex Fridman 1365:2001: A Space Odyssey 1113:Thanks. Just did so. 756: 389: 259:this article as a FAC 165:Message delivered by 3657:Conflict of interest 3302:David Grusch article 3265:Giordano Brunu Sir!! 3111:thank you very much 1609:Jim Moseley's memoir 3423:discussion pages . 2167:Financial times uFO 1576:Scientific American 1515:A barnstar for you! 1284:The Edge of Reality 1045:FatalSubjectivities 1003:FatalSubjectivities 965:John Eliot Gardiner 863:Congratulations! -- 842: 815:the statistics page 668: 395:Roland in Moonlight 137:you nominated as a 3667:Christopher Perrin 3619:ask questions here 3594: 3528:arbitration policy 2944:Much appreciated. 2331:the latest podcast 2254: 809:David Bentley Hart 782:David Bentley Hart 773:David Bentley Hart 758: 391: 292:David Bentley Hart 216:one response there 135:David Bentley Hart 128:David Bentley Hart 80:dispute resolution 41: 3633: 3632: 3564: 3394: 2322: 2321: 2196:Amirrezaahmadi134 2178:Amirrezaahmadi134 2138:Amirrezaahmadi134 2073:Amirrezaahmadi134 1966:Christopher MĆ¼nch 1721:please click here 1555: 1554: 904: 903: 861: 860: 812: 687: 686: 173: 119: 118: 60:Assume good faith 37: 3721: 3648: 3585: 3574: 3573: 3552: 3550: 3491: 3407: 3406: 3400: 3388: 3386: 3382: 3324:Amirreza-Astro21 3272:Hellomrcrumpet62 2864: 2312: 2245: 2234: 2233: 1827:Copyright issues 1574:This article in 1526: 1519: 1518: 1266:The Hidden Wound 1021:YouTube channel: 985:Request for help 884: 877: 876: 850: 843: 802: 795: 749: 676: 669: 642: 606: 557: 518: 449: 383: 339: 289: 256: 213: 164: 146: 145: 113: 16: 3729: 3728: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3720: 3719: 3718: 3659: 3646: 3583: 3572: 3567: 3566: 3544: 3492: 3484: 3417: 3404: 3403: 3398: 3356: 3304: 3267: 3208: 3038: 2854: 2841:Dick, Steven J. 2839: 2815:I just created 2327: 2310: 2243: 2232: 2169: 2148: 2108: 2060: 2023: 1948: 1829: 1793:read those PAGs 1651: 1517: 1314:American Cosmic 1218: 1063: 987: 936:Marian Anderson 823: 822: 793: 791:(both pictured) 750: 742: 636: 600: 551: 512: 443: 377: 333: 283: 257:I've nominated 246: 207: 169:, on behalf of 143: 131: 115: 114: 109: 86: 85: 55: 12: 11: 5: 3727: 3725: 3717: 3716: 3715: 3714: 3658: 3655: 3631: 3630: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3608: 3605: 3596: 3595: 3586: 3571: 3568: 3535:the candidates 3504:eligible users 3493: 3486: 3485: 3483: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3419:Hello Jjhake, 3416: 3413: 3381:{{Re|SunDawn}} 3355: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3303: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3266: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3207: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3168:174.165.128.85 3132: 3126: 3093: 3090: 3074: 3071: 3037: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 2994: 2941: 2933: 2925: 2917: 2906: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2852: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2708: 2601: 2597: 2596: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2476: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2361: 2360: 2326: 2323: 2320: 2319: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2268: 2265: 2256: 2255: 2246: 2231: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2210:Grusch article 2192: 2168: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2136: 2107: 2106:Must watch UAP 2104: 2103: 2102: 2059: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2022: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 1997: 1996: 1961:The 11th Green 1947: 1946:The 11th Green 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1910: 1828: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1749: 1703: 1650: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1553: 1552: 1536:Great work on 1533: 1532: 1527: 1516: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1378:cultural shock 1292:Jacques VallĆ©e 1288:J. Allen Hynek 1217: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1094: 1093: 1062: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1043:Okay, thanks! 1027: 1022: 986: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 958: 902: 901: 893: 892: 887: 885: 859: 858: 856:my story today 852: 851: 751: 744: 743: 741: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 718: 685: 684: 682:my story today 678: 677: 662: 661: 660: 659: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 598: 507: 506: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 411: 342:DYK nomination 331: 282: 279: 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 130: 126:nomination of 120: 117: 116: 107: 105: 104: 101: 100: 88: 87: 84: 83: 76: 71: 62: 56: 54: 53: 42: 33: 32: 29: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3726: 3713: 3709: 3705: 3701: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3676: 3672: 3668: 3664: 3656: 3654: 3653: 3650: 3649: 3642: 3638: 3627: 3621: 3620: 3615: 3614: 3609: 3606: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3598: 3597: 3591: 3582: 3580: 3576: 3575: 3569: 3565: 3563: 3559: 3555: 3548: 3542: 3541: 3536: 3531: 3529: 3525: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3508: 3506: 3505: 3500: 3499: 3490: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3458: 3454: 3449: 3446: 3444: 3439: 3437: 3432: 3430: 3424: 3420: 3414: 3412: 3411: 3408: 3401: 3395: 3392: 3391:Page Curation 3376: 3371: 3369: 3365: 3361: 3353: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3322: 3318: 3317: 3313: 3310: 3307: 3301: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3277: 3273: 3264: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3239: 3235: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3212: 3211: 3205: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3138:Westerosi456H 3136: 3133: 3130: 3127: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3113:Westerosi456H 3110: 3109: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3097: 3094: 3091: 3089: 3085: 3081: 3078: 3075: 3072: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3045:Westerosi456H 3041: 3035: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2992: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2942: 2939: 2934: 2931: 2926: 2923: 2918: 2915: 2913: 2907: 2904: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2862: 2859: 2855: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2822: 2818: 2817:James E. Lipp 2814: 2813: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2605: 2602: 2599: 2598: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2485: 2481: 2477: 2474: 2470: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2324: 2318: 2317: 2314: 2313: 2306: 2302: 2295: 2290: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2281: 2275: 2274: 2269: 2266: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2258: 2257: 2251: 2242: 2240: 2236: 2235: 2229: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2174: 2173: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2149: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2134: 2129: 2128: 2124: 2123: 2119: 2116: 2115: 2111: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2068: 2067: 2063: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2027: 2020: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1967: 1963: 1962: 1957: 1953: 1952:User:Drbogdan 1945: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1862: 1857: 1856: 1853: 1848: 1843: 1841: 1838: 1833: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1754: 1750: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1648: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1577: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1557: 1556: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1531: 1528: 1525: 1520: 1514: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1366: 1361: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1264:and his book 1263: 1262:Wendell Berry 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1215: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1060: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1026: 1023: 1020: 1019:Randos United 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 984: 978: 974: 970: 966: 962: 959: 957: 953: 949: 945: 941: 937: 933: 932: 931: 927: 923: 919: 918: 917: 916: 912: 908: 900:ā€“ nice work! 899: 895: 894: 891: 888: 883: 878: 875: 874: 870: 866: 857: 853: 849: 844: 841: 836: 835: 831: 827: 820: 816: 810: 806: 800: 796: 790: 788: 787:New Testament 784: 783: 776: 775: 774: 768: 767: 762: 755: 748: 739: 731: 727: 723: 719: 717: 713: 709: 705: 704: 703: 699: 695: 691: 690: 689: 688: 683: 679: 675: 670: 667: 658: 654: 650: 646: 640: 635: 634: 633: 632: 619: 615: 611: 604: 599: 597: 593: 589: 585: 584: 583: 579: 575: 571: 570: 569: 565: 561: 555: 550: 549: 548: 544: 540: 536: 535: 534: 530: 526: 522: 516: 511: 510: 509: 508: 505: 501: 497: 493: 492: 491: 490: 486: 482: 477: 462: 458: 454: 447: 442: 441: 440: 436: 432: 427: 426: 425: 421: 417: 412: 410: 406: 402: 397: 396: 388: 381: 376: 375: 374: 370: 366: 361: 360: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 337: 332: 330: 326: 322: 318: 317: 316: 315: 311: 307: 303: 302: 297: 293: 288: 280: 272: 268: 264: 260: 254: 250: 245: 244: 243: 239: 235: 231: 230: 229: 225: 221: 217: 211: 206: 205: 204: 203: 199: 195: 191: 186: 185: 181: 177: 172: 168: 162: 158: 154: 150: 140: 136: 129: 125: 121: 103: 102: 99: 96: 94: 90: 89: 81: 77: 75: 72: 70: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 51: 47: 46:Learn to edit 43: 40: 35: 34: 31: 30: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3707: 3689: 3660: 3644: 3634: 3617: 3613:sign up here 3611: 3599: 3577: 3538: 3532: 3509: 3502: 3496: 3494: 3471: 3450: 3447: 3440: 3433: 3425: 3421: 3418: 3396: 3378: 3373: 3364:User:SunDawn 3357: 3343: 3319: 3314: 3311: 3308: 3305: 3291: 3268: 3252: 3237: 3216: 3213: 3209: 3185: 3156: 3102: 3083: 3064: 3042: 3039: 3009: 2997: 2963: 2949: 2936: 2928: 2920: 2911: 2909: 2901: 2844: 2821:Project Sign 2806: 2778: 2756: 2719: 2701: 2639: 2610: 2581: 2572: 2549: 2513: 2483: 2389: 2353: 2328: 2308: 2298: 2283: 2273:sign up here 2271: 2259: 2237: 2217: 2175: 2170: 2156: 2130: 2125: 2120: 2117: 2112: 2109: 2095: 2087: 2069: 2064: 2061: 2047: 2024: 1989: 1959: 1949: 1931: 1886: 1864: 1859: 1854: 1850: 1845: 1834: 1830: 1816: 1798:JoJo Anthrax 1792: 1781:WP:CONSENSUS 1762: 1742: 1725:JoJo Anthrax 1710: 1696: 1677:JoJo Anthrax 1652: 1630: 1613:- LuckyLouie 1598: 1575: 1564: 1529: 1468: 1460: 1428: 1400: 1373: 1363: 1349: 1321: 1313: 1283: 1273: 1265: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1176: 1147: 1118: 1086: 1064: 1034: 1018: 994: 988: 969:Gerda Arendt 948:Gerda Arendt 925: 905: 889: 865:Gerda Arendt 862: 824: 792: 780: 778: 771: 770: 766:Did you know 764: 761:6 April 2023 722:Gerda Arendt 711: 694:Gerda Arendt 652: 613: 603:Gerda Arendt 591: 574:Gerda Arendt 563: 554:Gerda Arendt 539:Gerda Arendt 528: 519:I nominated 499: 475: 473: 456: 419: 404: 393: 353: 324: 299: 284: 266: 249:Gerda Arendt 234:Gerda Arendt 223: 210:Gerda Arendt 194:Gerda Arendt 187: 156: 139:good article 133:The article 132: 91: 3540:voting page 3399:āœ  SunDawn āœ  2325:Black Vault 2021:New article 1914:Steve Quinn 1900:Steve Quinn 1868:Steve Quinn 1796:to happen. 1769:bludgeoning 1457:Garry Nolan 1296:Ely, Nevada 1246:Steve Quinn 890:Hook update 840:April songs 666:March songs 190:peer review 167:ChristieBot 161:nominate it 141:has passed 3671:Auttamaton 3524:topic bans 3040:Hi Jhake, 2853:0521620120 2712:to-do list 2582:Weaponized 1777:disruption 1765:good faith 1286:(1975) by 942:and music 805:here's how 253:Helloheart 176:Helloheart 171:Helloheart 3520:site bans 3436:this link 3405:(contact) 2977:Viriditas 2888:Viriditas 2826:Viriditas 2789:Viriditas 2760:Viriditas 2730:Viriditas 2683:Viriditas 2668:Viriditas 2651:Viriditas 2622:Viriditas 2586:Viriditas 2575:hearings? 2532:Viriditas 2495:Viriditas 2446:Viriditas 2400:Viriditas 2372:Viriditas 2335:Viriditas 2029:Viriditas 2005:Viriditas 1971:Viriditas 1581:Viriditas 1542:Viriditas 1479:Viriditas 1443:Viriditas 1411:Viriditas 1383:Viriditas 1332:Viriditas 1300:Viriditas 1188:Viriditas 1158:Viriditas 1130:Viriditas 1101:Viriditas 1068:Viriditas 995:manualist 826:BorgQueen 157:bold link 82:if needed 65:Be polite 25:talk page 2861:39093581 2843:(1998). 2088:Politico 1839:article 1370:the book 608:stage.-- 93:Archives 50:get help 19:This is 3547:NoACEMM 3375:family! 2131:notes: 1956:B movie 1360:Pasulka 907:Bruxton 639:Pbritti 515:Pbritti 481:Pbritti 446:Pbritti 431:Pbritti 380:Pbritti 365:Pbritti 336:Pbritti 306:Pbritti 294:at the 3704:Jjhake 3686:Jjhake 3647:buidhe 3468:Jjhake 3340:Jjhake 3288:Jjhake 3249:Jjhake 3234:Jjhake 3182:Jjhake 3153:Jjhake 3099:Jjhake 3080:Jjhake 3061:Jjhake 3006:Jjhake 2960:Jjhake 2946:Jjhake 2803:Jjhake 2775:Jjhake 2716:Jjhake 2698:Jjhake 2636:Jjhake 2607:Jjhake 2546:Jjhake 2510:Jjhake 2480:Jjhake 2386:Jjhake 2350:Jjhake 2311:buidhe 2214:Jjhake 2153:Jjhake 2092:Jjhake 2044:Jjhake 1986:Jjhake 1928:Jjhake 1883:Jjhake 1813:Jjhake 1789:WP:NPA 1787:, and 1739:Jjhake 1707:Jjhake 1693:Jjhake 1668:) and 1658:WP:NPA 1627:Jjhake 1595:Jjhake 1561:Jjhake 1465:Jjhake 1425:Jjhake 1397:Jjhake 1346:Jjhake 1318:Jjhake 1270:Jjhake 1173:Jjhake 1144:Jjhake 1115:Jjhake 1083:Jjhake 1061:GA nom 1031:Jjhake 922:Jjhake 708:Jjhake 649:Jjhake 610:Jjhake 588:Jjhake 560:Jjhake 525:Jjhake 496:Jjhake 453:Jjhake 416:Jjhake 401:Jjhake 350:Jjhake 321:Jjhake 263:Jjhake 220:Jjhake 147:; see 21:Jjhake 1785:WP:EW 961:Today 122:Your 78:Seek 3708:talk 3690:talk 3675:talk 3665:and 3558:talk 3510:The 3472:talk 3457:talk 3385:~~~~ 3344:talk 3328:talk 3292:talk 3276:talk 3253:talk 3238:talk 3222:talk 3186:talk 3172:talk 3157:talk 3142:talk 3117:talk 3103:talk 3084:talk 3065:talk 3049:talk 3010:talk 3002:here 2991:here 2981:talk 2964:talk 2950:talk 2892:talk 2858:OCLC 2849:ISBN 2830:talk 2807:talk 2793:talk 2779:talk 2764:talk 2734:talk 2720:talk 2702:talk 2687:talk 2672:talk 2655:talk 2640:talk 2626:talk 2611:talk 2590:talk 2550:talk 2536:talk 2514:talk 2499:talk 2484:talk 2473:here 2471:and 2469:here 2450:talk 2436:and 2404:talk 2390:talk 2376:talk 2354:talk 2339:talk 2218:talk 2200:talk 2182:talk 2157:talk 2142:talk 2096:talk 2077:talk 2048:talk 2033:talk 2009:talk 1990:talk 1975:talk 1932:talk 1918:talk 1904:talk 1887:talk 1872:talk 1817:talk 1802:talk 1771:the 1753:here 1743:talk 1729:talk 1711:talk 1697:talk 1681:talk 1670:this 1662:this 1654:Here 1631:talk 1617:talk 1599:talk 1585:talk 1565:talk 1546:talk 1483:talk 1469:talk 1447:talk 1429:talk 1415:talk 1401:talk 1387:talk 1350:talk 1336:talk 1322:talk 1304:talk 1290:and 1274:talk 1250:talk 1192:talk 1177:talk 1162:talk 1148:talk 1134:talk 1119:talk 1105:talk 1087:talk 1072:talk 1049:talk 1035:talk 1007:talk 973:talk 967:. -- 952:talk 946:. -- 944:here 940:here 926:talk 911:talk 869:talk 830:talk 785:ā€“ a 726:talk 712:talk 698:talk 653:talk 614:talk 592:talk 578:talk 564:talk 543:talk 529:talk 500:talk 485:talk 476:ALT1 457:talk 435:talk 420:talk 405:talk 369:talk 354:talk 325:talk 310:talk 267:talk 251:and 238:talk 224:talk 198:talk 180:talk 67:and 3616:or 3451:-- 3431:. 3218:jps 1649:NPA 759:On 174:-- 23:'s 3710:) 3692:) 3677:) 3669:? 3643:) 3639:Ā· 3560:) 3549:}} 3545:{{ 3522:, 3474:) 3459:) 3445:. 3387:. 3362:. 3346:) 3330:) 3294:) 3278:) 3255:) 3240:) 3224:) 3188:) 3174:) 3159:) 3144:) 3119:) 3105:) 3086:) 3067:) 3051:) 3036:hi 3012:) 3004:. 2983:) 2966:) 2952:) 2894:) 2856:. 2832:) 2809:) 2795:) 2781:) 2766:) 2736:) 2722:) 2714:. 2704:) 2689:) 2674:) 2657:) 2642:) 2628:) 2613:) 2592:) 2552:) 2538:) 2516:) 2501:) 2486:) 2475:). 2452:) 2406:) 2392:) 2378:) 2356:) 2341:) 2307:) 2303:Ā· 2220:) 2202:) 2184:) 2159:) 2144:) 2098:) 2090:. 2079:) 2050:) 2035:) 2011:) 1992:) 1977:) 1934:) 1920:) 1906:) 1889:) 1874:) 1819:) 1804:) 1783:, 1745:) 1731:) 1723:. 1713:) 1699:) 1683:) 1633:) 1619:) 1601:) 1587:) 1567:) 1548:) 1485:) 1471:) 1449:) 1431:) 1417:) 1403:) 1389:) 1352:) 1338:) 1324:) 1306:) 1276:) 1252:) 1194:) 1179:) 1164:) 1150:) 1136:) 1121:) 1107:) 1089:) 1074:) 1051:) 1037:) 1009:) 975:) 954:) 928:) 913:) 871:) 832:) 821:. 807:, 763:, 728:) 714:) 700:) 655:) 616:) 594:) 580:) 566:) 545:) 531:) 502:) 487:) 459:) 437:) 422:) 407:) 371:) 356:) 327:) 312:) 269:) 240:) 226:) 200:) 182:) 124:GA 48:; 3706:( 3688:( 3673:( 3641:c 3637:t 3635:( 3622:. 3581:| 3556:( 3470:( 3455:( 3342:( 3326:( 3290:( 3274:( 3251:( 3236:( 3220:( 3184:( 3170:( 3155:( 3140:( 3131:? 3115:( 3101:( 3082:( 3063:( 3047:( 3008:( 2979:( 2962:( 2948:( 2890:( 2863:. 2828:( 2805:( 2791:( 2777:( 2762:( 2732:( 2718:( 2700:( 2685:( 2670:( 2653:( 2638:( 2624:( 2609:( 2588:( 2548:( 2534:( 2512:( 2497:( 2482:( 2448:( 2402:( 2388:( 2374:( 2352:( 2337:( 2305:c 2301:t 2299:( 2276:. 2241:| 2216:( 2198:( 2180:( 2155:( 2140:( 2094:( 2075:( 2046:( 2031:( 2007:( 1988:( 1973:( 1930:( 1916:( 1902:( 1885:( 1870:( 1855:: 1815:( 1800:( 1741:( 1727:( 1709:( 1695:( 1679:( 1664:( 1629:( 1615:( 1597:( 1583:( 1563:( 1544:( 1481:( 1467:( 1445:( 1427:( 1413:( 1399:( 1385:( 1348:( 1334:( 1320:( 1302:( 1272:( 1248:( 1190:( 1175:( 1160:( 1146:( 1132:( 1117:( 1103:( 1085:( 1070:( 1047:( 1033:( 1005:( 971:( 950:( 924:( 909:( 867:( 828:( 811:) 803:( 794:? 724:( 710:( 696:( 651:( 641:: 637:@ 612:( 605:: 601:@ 590:( 576:( 562:( 556:: 552:@ 541:( 527:( 517:: 513:@ 498:( 483:( 455:( 448:: 444:@ 433:( 418:( 403:( 382:: 378:@ 367:( 352:( 338:: 334:@ 323:( 308:( 265:( 255:: 247:@ 236:( 222:( 212:: 208:@ 196:( 178:( 98:1 95:: 52:.

Index

Jjhake
talk page
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Archives
1
GA
David Bentley Hart
David Bentley Hart
good article
Talk:David Bentley Hart
Talk:David Bentley Hart/GA1
nominate it
ChristieBot
Helloheart
Helloheart
talk
03:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
peer review
Gerda Arendt
talk
07:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Gerda Arendt
one response there

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘