404:
doesn't based on whether or not someone can move around on the site or not. I'm a busy woman. I have just joined the
National Speakers Association and have places to go to talk about positive moves, I'm not about to BLANK someone out, nor am I going to argue with the WIKI people as to who is notable and who isn't. I'm fine. I have my success and I know who I am. I am impressed that you would like to help. I can give you any answers you want, but really, I'm OK with not being on WIKI if it means bowing to someone or kissing tail. I have sold more than 50,000 copies of one book, and 20,000 of another - and in a few weeks when my dog is picked up for a movie - I'm sure this Carlo character will be first in line to add me back on as her trainer, guardian, and LINK to her site. That's all it was, a link. Dang, it's as if you want someone to be a notable author in terms of being popular. That's not notable, notable is selling more than 5000 copies. I've more than surpassed that number, the first 6 months of my publication.
430:
folks try to better the project. My idea of bettering it might have little to nothing to do with your idea of bettering it or Carlos' idea of bettering it. That's why this operates at least in part as a collective. Compared against some things that I have seen survive, your article should certainly stay. That's my opinion, but I'm just one person. Carlos is just one person. Regarding my assumptions, as you call them, someone using your user account
35:
281:
policies here can be difficult, but there are some that you should familiarize yourself with. First, you should make no further edits to the article yourself. I am offering to act as your proxy in this matter, a dispassionate third party. If there is something more that you want to add, then you should work through me (or another editor). Why? Because writing encyclopedic articles about yourself is highly discouraged and implies a
65:
101:
113:
125:
89:
77:
429:
As "an encyclopedia that anyone can edit" and one of the 10 most visited sites on the internet, I honestly hope you would understand the need to have guidelines on what makes it onto the site and what doesn't. These aren't any one person's ideas or conventions. This is a project and a community and
434:
blank that page. The natural assumption is that it was you. If you think your account has been compromised, I suggest changing your password or making sure you log out. Regardless, the acerbic nature of your comments border on the uncivil and I don't understand the hostility, to be frank. But to
280:
Welcome to
Knowledge (XXG). I removed the speedy deletion template from this article, but it will still face serious challenges for survival. I'd be glad to help, but only if you're willing to work within the parameters of this project. I understand full well that coming to grips with the various
403:
The assumptions you make are amazing. I didn't BLANK out Carlo. Someone using my username may have. I'm a teacher too, and I have more than 100 little hackers that do things without my knowledge. I don't care if I'm on WIKI but it was really lame of the administrators to say who gets on and who
293:
sources to establish any claims to notability. I am not sure that one feature on Oprah (was it you, or just your book) is enough to satisfy that. If you have received any significant press coverage and can cite that, that is the best way to go. Please contact me on
200:. Knowledge (XXG) gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge (XXG), the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an
208:
indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
22:
245:
I have added this article as a candidate for speedy deletion for the same two reasons as the last time it was deleted. In case you are unaware, Knowledge (XXG) has a policy against
257:, and although he may not have personally sought out your article, he probably saw it on the list of articles to be deleted, and went ahead and confirmed it. —
143:
254:
232:
448:
420:
342:
309:
26:
205:
331:
may have been a mistake, but in light of your situation, it appears to have been retaliatory. Don't do things like that any more.
221:
201:
105:
69:
231:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at
146:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
435:
each their own. I have tried to help you. I wish you luck with your career and the best of health to you and to Faith.
396:
184:
160:
216:
117:
197:
57:
39:
139:
445:
358:
339:
306:
295:
130:
408:
147:
412:
298:
should you have any questions. And remember to sign your talk comments with four tildes like so: ~~~~
325:
168:
436:
332:
299:
29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
365:- specifically discussion page vandalism. Please refrain from doing so in the future. Thanks. —
154:
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —
34:
394:
387:
366:
274:
258:
239:
182:
158:
246:
93:
362:
286:
282:
175:
64:
100:
289:
guidelines. I suggest that you read them carefully, because it's vital that you provide
112:
228:
88:
290:
81:
124:
391:
179:
155:
76:
253:
of that page where you ask if "Carlo a
Knowledge (XXG) police:" he's actually a
455:
398:
376:
351:
318:
268:
186:
162:
285:. The article, as it stands, does not appear to satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s
178:. There may be potential issues with your editing that article. regards —
249:, and I would implore you to read that page. As to your comments on an
212:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
361:. I am reminding you that this is considered a type of
329:
250:
192:License tagging for Image:Jude Stringfellow.jpg
386:I think you meant to make your comment here:
8:
174:Hi there. I just want to direct you to the
138:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
390:. You actually commented on an image. —
233:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions
357:You recently reverted several edits on
7:
222:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags
150:, ask me on my talk page, or place
58:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
14:
235:. 02:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
217:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy
123:
111:
99:
87:
75:
63:
33:
227:This is an automated notice by
456:03:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
399:23:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
377:05:31, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
352:08:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
319:08:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
269:04:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
176:Conflict of Interest guideline
1:
255:Knowledge (XXG) administrator
187:01:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
163:01:38, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
106:How to write a great article
328:user page as you did here:
198:Image:Jude Stringfellow.jpg
23:welcome to Knowledge (XXG)!
472:
21:Hello, Jstringfellow, and
148:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
359:Talk:Jude Stringfellow
206:image description page
196:Thanks for uploading
283:conflict of interest
70:How to edit a page
27:your contributions
452:
425:
411:comment added by
388:User talk:Timotab
348:
315:
275:Jude Stringfellow
240:Jude Stringfellow
463:
453:
450:
442:
424:
405:
373:
370:
349:
344:
336:
326:Carlossuarez46's
316:
311:
303:
265:
262:
153:
127:
115:
103:
91:
79:
67:
52:
37:
471:
470:
466:
465:
464:
462:
461:
460:
449:
438:
406:
384:
371:
368:
343:
334:
324:P.S. Blanking
310:
301:
278:
263:
260:
247:autobiographies
243:
204:applied to the
194:
172:
151:
118:Manual of Style
55:
54:
53:
48:
19:
12:
11:
5:
469:
467:
459:
458:
383:
380:
355:
354:
277:
272:
242:
237:
225:
224:
219:
193:
190:
171:
166:
144:sign your name
136:
135:
121:
109:
97:
85:
73:
61:
47:
46:
45:
43:
25:Thank you for
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
468:
457:
454:
446:
444:
443:
441:
440:Into The Fray
433:
428:
427:
426:
422:
418:
414:
413:Jstringfellow
410:
401:
400:
397:
395:
393:
389:
381:
379:
378:
375:
374:
364:
360:
353:
350:
347:
340:
338:
337:
335:Into The Fray
330:
327:
323:
322:
321:
320:
317:
314:
307:
305:
304:
302:Into The Fray
297:
292:
288:
284:
276:
273:
271:
270:
267:
266:
256:
252:
248:
241:
238:
236:
234:
230:
223:
220:
218:
215:
214:
213:
210:
207:
203:
199:
191:
189:
188:
185:
183:
181:
177:
170:
169:Jstringfellow
167:
165:
164:
161:
159:
157:
149:
145:
141:
134:
133:
132:
126:
122:
120:
119:
114:
110:
108:
107:
102:
98:
96:
95:
90:
86:
84:
83:
78:
74:
72:
71:
66:
62:
60:
59:
51:
44:
42:
41:
36:
32:
31:
30:
28:
24:
16:
439:
437:
431:
416:
407:— Preceding
402:
385:
367:
356:
345:
333:
312:
300:
296:my talk page
279:
259:
244:
226:
211:
195:
173:
137:
131:Fun stuff...
129:
128:
116:
104:
92:
80:
68:
56:
49:
40:Introduction
38:
20:
291:verifiable
287:notability
251:older edit
152:{{helpme}}
140:Wikipedian
363:vandalism
229:OrphanBot
202:image tag
142:! Please
421:contribs
409:unsigned
382:Hi there
17:Welcome!
392:Timotab
372:Annyong
264:Annyong
180:Timotab
156:Timotab
369:Hello
261:Hello
417:talk
94:Tips
82:Help
432:did
423:)
419:•
451:C
447:/
415:(
346:C
341:/
313:C
308:/
50:5
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
