User talk:Jules TH 16

440:, these reviews should do it regarding notability. However, could you please summarize them in your words (either separately or in one summary statement), then attach the references to that statement? I have named the refs ":1" through "4:" - just move the tags that now sit loose under "Reception" to the end of a sentence/paragraph that they pertain to (after the punctuation). Also, please see if you can source the information in the lede - there's no indication where, e.g., that bit about 5000 copies comes from. Cheers -- 415:) 11:05, 25 February 2018 (UTC) I am discouraged. And I don't see myself attempting to write a Knowledge article anytime soon again. Not after pouring so much work into this one, and actually analysing all the Inducks statistics in order to give a good overview of the collaborations... I am not "connected" in any way to the subject, apart from being a fan of the creator - but who else other than fans write articles about creators anyway? Should I start writing Knowledge articles about creators I don't like? Ludicrous. 1916:, to prevent any further confusion. Accordingly, I've removed my reply to you and then your reply to me, which were both caused by the lack of signing. Editors usually aren't supposed to remove other peoples comments, however, in this circumstances I just thought it would be simpler and less confusing for future readers to remove both our comments. But if you're unhappy about this you are more than within your rights to revert my removal, and feel free to do so guilt-free. Have a great day. 1296: 1822: 1659: 1503: 138: 885: 811: 680: 1226:, "my good friend Macman, a.k.a. Neil Mack will be tripping the light fantastic on 2EARFM in the third of his series of albums Fifty Years On. Macman’s show takes its name from a lyric in the Grace Jones’ song Walking In the Rain. She sings “Trip the light fantastic, dance the swivel hips” originally composed and recorded by Australian band Flash and the Pan." Trivial? Maybe? 1057: 1749: 1403:

Looool, and I was afraid I was getting some talk page abuse because of my involvement on a hotly discussed political article! Yeah, it's really a small world, isn't it?? If you hadn't sent me the Wiki link, I wouldn't have noticed that "CD" bit. (There are a few other things about the article I think

1256:

in any detail; just passing mention. I'm not entirely sure how that applies to the use of a phrase, but I'd like to see sources that spend a bit more time on it rather than just, "Oh, it's in this song." And really, the sources don't even say that, they just list lyrics of which the phrase is a part.

1386:

You cleverly caught an obvious goof on the Wiki page for Russ Freeman (pianist). A musical recording from the 1950's is an LP, not a CD. I saw your correction, and when I checked out your personal Wiki page, the Tears for Fears reference jumped out and instantly told me that you're my latest Twitter

102:

edit or create articles on subjects that I am relatively knowledgeable about, that interest me. Changing the formulation of an article that doesn't interest me in the slightest is NOT my thing. So please, people, be patient with me; just because I'm useless at some things doesn't mean I'm useless at

97:

Since I'm still not very experienced with wikipedia editing, I thought I should leave this message for anyone who wants to bug me. Yes - I am not good at wikipedia markup, formatting, references, categories, all that stuff. No - I'm not working for anybody, my main goal is to create articles which I

487:

Hi, I noticed you tried to get a article regarding Casty published, but it is currently lacking proper references according to wikipedia, but I noticed there are a lot of media publications featuring Casty and his work posted att Casty's facebook page, which could be used. I have pasted one in the

1911:

because the two people who responded to the comment before you did did not bother to sign their posts. This led me to believe that everything since the first comment was written by you. This is not your fault so there's not need to apologise. I have since taken the liberty to go back and sign the

1477:

Thanks brother! I see you're also a Pink Floyd fan - my first online activities were on the (sadly now defunct) All Pink Floyd Fan Network. I wish I were more active on Knowledge but I find that a lot of the disputes I've gotten myself into have not been particularly good for my mental health, so

1461:

This is truly appreciated, from your user page: "My pet peeve? Deleting articles that had been up for years and were moderately useful. Redirects are useless and Knowledge should grow in quality, not decrease in quantity. Improve an article before you just throw it out with the bathwater. (Also,

488:

article with instructions, since I found your writing good I thought it would be best if you would like to check these sources out and add the proper text and sources to the Casty article instead of me finishing it up. Use google translate on the italian. Best regards

554:, I had to step out because it was starting to affect me personally. Sadly, neither of the two projects seems to be interested in Disney comics (one is all about comics, but not by Disney, the other only seems to concern Disney films... I will try to ask though.) I 1260:

I think The Beagle link is actually more interesting, as it presents the phrase with some context, though I'm not really sure whether the show being discussed is especially significant. Still, it's better, IMO, than, "this song contains this

531:

That's because the different language WP:s make up their own policies and guidelines, and implement them as they are able. NO references may be against their PAG:s too, but perhaps nobody noticed that article. Wikis can be uneven like that.

1404:

could be improved from a Wiki standpoint IMHO, but it's not a big deal.) I'm not on Facebook but I do have a YouTube channel... which I really want to get in some shape. I'll share the link when I think it's up to scratch. See ya

562:

There are several articles about Casty, interviews with him and more, but because I can't read Italian and Google Translate screws up the layout so it's unreadable, somebody else can perhaps kindly work these references into my

1387:

buddy. It's a small world here on the Internet! Thanks for the needed edit, and you're cordially invited to visit me anytime at www.youtube.com/channel/UCtOcHtgL8K9T22KMN13ApMQ or at www.facebook.com/paula.k.freeman.

173:

It's an advert/resume. All of the sourcing appears user-driven; either directly, through blogs, or via PR-"interviews". Most of the content has no sourcing at all. Nothing to indicate Notability. Tagging for Speedy

1867: 1704: 1546: 1103: 1931:

Thanks, I think it's fine the way it is now. I wasn't too annoyed with you anyway, since I could easily see what happened on the page (and should have caught that right after adding my two cents worth!).

1851:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1688:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1530:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1108:

Also, this seems to be one of those cases where sourcing is starting to look odd. Anyone can listen to the song online and confirm that the lyrics as I quoted them actually appear in the song.

1244:

of the phrase, with no clear indication that they're objectively considered significant (also, blogs typically aren't reliable sources, but that's a secondary point). If we were talking about

1160:

But if I want to split hairs, I've seen wrong lyrics printed on official releases. And if I were to use the Discogs link, someone is going to tell me Discogs is not a reliable source either.

1836: 1673: 1516: 1340: 1332: 1325: 1317: 1313: 769:, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 266: 862:

Yeah, because I got frustrated with never getting approval for my articles. You can see from my irregular log-ins that I'm really not keen on writing any future Wiki articles.

1312:

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

1104:

https://img.discogs.com/-1OMWbgJDBXHJ8Y_N4W3C_0F4G8=/fit-in/600x594/filters:strip_icc():format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-9013253-1483468918-2093.jpeg.jpg

1077: 509:

Thanks for the comment and the help, but I'd actually prefer it if you finished the article up for me instead (and possibly helped me out on the Massimo De Vita article:

1362:

Wow, I totally didn't see that a certain user removed a comment on my talk page left by another user. I can't undo that now since I edited the page in the meantime, but

264:! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the 169:

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

1264:

Again though, this is just my opinion, and you're welcome to ask the question at the article's Talk page, as other editors may have opinions that differ from my own.

732:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

1955: 365:

has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

176:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

910:, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at 836:, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at 579: 254: 578: 705:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 73: 1780:" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( 957: 331: 603: 462:

My problem is that I have fantastic memory (and I only edit articles about subjects that I am knowledgeable about) but I'm useless at references :(

38: 772:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

158: 1343:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 953: 190:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

79: 537: 1890: 1727: 1569: 1125:

Personally I think it would be best to provide a source that actually discusses the occurrence of the phrase in the lyrics, to satisfy any

495: 161:, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Knowledge's 516:

And I just realised that the Italian Wiki page has NO references whatsoever! If that is allowed, why am I being pestered so much?! Sigh...

1443: 1777: 906:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

832:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

701:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

1129:

concerns, but that may be an outlying opinion. If you disagree, you're welcome to raise the question at the article's Talk page.

551: 533: 1886: 1765: 1741: 1723: 1565: 1336: 154: 144: 125: 1102:

Yes, I know the problem with online lyrics sites, but in this case, Genius was correct. Would printed lyrics of a CD suffice?

1467: 24: 1773: 452: 378: 334:

contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click

227: 68: 1860: 1697: 1539: 852: 430: 276:, a friendly space on Knowledge where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 311:. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with 1872: 1709: 1551: 1240:

What concerns me, though other editors may disagree, is that the first two links you provided just appear to refer to

59: 1352: 1321: 1069: 1154: 1463: 373:

Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions. Knowledge is not a

312: 355:

That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject.

1921: 1805: 1073: 1065: 499: 385: 358: 315:." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See 335: 1761: 1447: 1433:

i've provided a few extra sources for you after richard responded saying your existing stuff wasn't enough.

900: 878: 826: 804: 766: 754: 695: 673: 412: 162: 782:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

1848: 1685: 1527: 1348: 400: 396: 147:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

947: 938:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

911: 840:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — 837: 794: 783: 733: 491: 166: 1188: 1917: 1801: 1753: 1223: 1022: 907: 833: 702: 651: 103:

everything. Those who are better at those things are always welcome to correct what I've done, but

49: 914:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 736:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 1593: 744: 595: 304: 272: 191: 184: 129: 64: 1136:

as no context is provided and there's no clear indication that the lyrics listed are "official".

465:

My copy actually has a sticker on it that says "Strictly limited to 5.000 copies worldwide"...

1978: 1913: 1830: 1667: 1642: 1608: 1510: 1392: 1272: 1144: 1092: 1081: 1041: 1007: 973: 599: 448: 327: 270:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the 150: 45: 1935: 1908: 1879: 1844: 1716: 1681: 1558: 1523: 1479: 1408: 1367: 1302:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

1227: 1195: 1164: 1109: 896: 863: 846: 822: 776: 691: 517: 469: 437: 416: 198: 107: 20: 1859:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1696:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1538:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 602:

because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion

1623: 939: 790: 762: 641: 950:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 510: 1856: 1793: 1693: 1535: 1249: 1126: 1086:

Please note that genius.com is not a reliable source. Thank you for your understanding!

647: 323: 281: 237: 1295: 1192: 1852: 1689: 1589: 1531: 1462:

guidelines are not laws.)" Knowledge needs more editing in this spirit. Thank you. --

988: 964:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

892: 818: 740: 687: 633: 627: 389: 362: 308: 399:

Don't feel discouraged. My first attempts at creating articles were deleted too. --

1974: 1970: 1638: 1634: 1604: 1600: 1388: 1268: 1140: 1133: 1088: 1072:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to 1061: 1037: 1033: 1003: 999: 969: 965: 442: 346: 316: 300: 299:

Hello, Jules TH 16. Thank you for helping to build Knowledge-- the world's largest

1821: 1658: 1502: 616: 253: 153:

than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a

1248:

and these links were used in the article, I'd remove them as clear violations of

1026: 992: 841: 350: 342: 1155:

https://www.discogs.com/de/Flash-And-The-Pan-Flash-And-The-Pan-/release/9013253

1139:

Hope this is helpful. Again, thanks for getting back to me with your concerns!

137: 1959: 1934:

Didn't know about that template, interesting stuff. Have a great day as well.

1792:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

1407:

Edit: Did look at your FB profile, very nice photos of you and those cats! :)

513:). I've spent way too much time on it already. Plus I don't have facebook... 332:

Knowledge:Identifying_blatant_advertising#Typical_signs_of_blatant_advertising

1963: 1396: 277: 233: 1982: 1943: 1925: 1894: 1809: 1731: 1646: 1612: 1573: 1487: 1471: 1451: 1416: 1375: 1356: 1276: 1235: 1203: 1172: 1148: 1117: 1096: 1045: 1011: 977: 928: 891:

Hello, Jules TH 16. It has been over six months since you last edited the

871: 857: 817:

Hello, Jules TH 16. It has been over six months since you last edited the

798: 748: 686:

Hello, Jules TH 16. It has been over six months since you last edited the

655: 606:. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please 541: 525: 503: 477: 457: 424: 285: 241: 115: 1907:

Hi Jules TH 16. Looks like there was some confusion at the talk page for

919: 1863:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1700:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1542:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1056: 1840:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1677:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1520:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

559: 374: 326:

are against Knowledge policy and not permitted. Users who do so may be

105:

I firmly believe that an imperfect article is better than none at all.

1627: 1219: 1222:

has a radio program called "Trip The Light Fantastic". According to

1163:

I doubt I'm going to find a source that satisfies demands. Oh well.

1153:

The context is that is a scan of this official CD reissue booklet:

943: 1267:

Thanks for spending the time and energy to discuss this with me!

1189:

https://www.stereostories.com/walking-in-the-rain-by-grace-jones/

1954: