User talk:Justlookingforthemoment

933:. It must be noted that the information that I used from the PDF is not protected by copyright. If yes, can you please show me a proof. That would be better. Also, you have been repeatedly messaging me regarding Copyrights. Can you please tell me more on how exactly can we find out whether the source we are referring to is protected by copyright, and if yes, then how and when can we use it. That would help me a lot. Also, you have said that I may be blocked from editing. Can you please show me a WP article which says that users will be blocked if they violates copyright policy. I could not find one in any of the pages in Knowledge (XXG) regarding this. Hope you do it. Thanks! 999:"Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted material despite appropriate warning may be blocked from editing by any administrator to prevent further problems. Contributors who have extensively violated copyright policy by uploading many copyrighted files or placing copyrighted text into numerous articles may be blocked without warning for the protection of the project. These blocks are usually indefinite, pending satisfactory assurances that infringement will not continue." 294: 122: 1902:, I'm similarly mystified. I notice you do a lot of anti-vandalism work, and it concerns me that you would issue a 'vandalism' warning for that edit. A new user could be upset and dissuaded from contributing further on receipt of a seemingly unfounded 'vandalism' warning such as that. You might not like the edit stylistically, but I really don't see anything approaching vandalism. Maybe I'm missing something? -- 1764: 864: 771: 743: 664: 573: 2843: 2752: 2664: 2576: 2418: 2226: 1725: 1547: 1492: 504: 1065:

it, I'll try to explain. On the whole, you seem to be improving. The important thing is not to repeat errors - it took you a long time to "get" the copyvio stuff that many people tried hard for ages to explain. As I said, I'm not going to be a "guide" or "coach" - I simply don't have the time - but if you take it slow, listen to advice and avoid repeating errors you'll do fine. --

1839: 2143: 1804: 696: 636: 1122: 128: 2522: 25: 1674: 1441: 1386: 2104:

Don't blank redirects. If you think there is a better target, retarget them. If you think they shouldn't exist, nominate them for deletion. If you think a properly sourced, non copyright-violating, notable article or fully sourced, notable list article can be made instead of the redirect(s) then make

2873:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of

1600:

The reason is that they will know better than anyone what work still needs to be done on the article, or where its weak points are, or what doesn't meet the criteria. You haven't done this for any of your nominations, so I will be reverting them. If you wish to do the consultation, which should last

883:

for more information on uploading your material to Knowledge (XXG). For legal reasons, Knowledge (XXG) cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted.

790:

592:

1620:

I understand, and I may do leave a message on talk page for the article to get nominated for Good Article, but what if no recent editor of that article replies. That there is a very small chance of the recent/active editors of that article to come back and see the talk page, and participate in the

1211:

I didn't mean anything sinister, just an awareness note to you that there are some wikipedians who don't like to discuss things like their location, name, gender etc., and might not react well to such questions. I'm not one of them - that I am male, English born, Australian resident is no secret -

1064:

Not at all. I watch many pages, and I check back on users who've had problems, such as your copyvio issues. If they are making a mess I try to clean up, and I try to explain in summaries what I've done. I'm not your mentor, or coach, but if you disagree with a change I've made, or don't understand

537:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

1117:

Free advice - if people don't prominently disclose personal details on wikipedia that might be because they want to keep them private, and some don't like to be asked, so beware. Anyway, no, I'm not - not that it's important, or relevant. (but I have spent some time there and, like most people, I

2056:

Hi, it's general practice to respect the existing citation style (including the names of headings) in an article. Please don't alter them with edit summaries like "improve headings" because you are actually just changing them from one preference to another. You should respect the existing style

2391:

for an explanation for a tag they were trying to place and failing to do correctly. What good to other editors looking for an explanation is you rattling on about it on my talk page instead of article talk where they will look? And in response you have just petulantly replaced the tag with no

1604:

It's great that you're interested in the GA process. You should be aware that the nominator is expected to work on the article to address the issues raised in the course of the nomination; if you don't, then there really isn't any point in nominating, because the nomination will fail if the

375:

be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Knowledge (XXG). Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable,

2080:

don’t interconvert “References” and “Further reading” as they’re completely different things. “References” is for sources used by Knowledge (XXG) contributors in creating and verifying article content. “Further reading” is for readers who want to learn more. This is explained at

1003:

You have now been warned many times, and have had many opportunities to read the links in the warnings. This is not a matter that you can "argue about" or "get away with". Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy

1584:

Justlookingforthemoment, you have nominated a number of articles for GA lately, and as best I can determine you are not a significant editor to any of them. Two of them have already been quickfailed, indicating that you don't have a firm grasp on how to apply the

2366:

tag at the top of a section, and it was really that simple, but it seems you have no other work to do but just attack on each of my edits here, so you need to say something, which doesn't matter whether its even practical or not, so please stop doing it.

1294:. I undid it for now, since TikTok videos are not restricted to fifteen seconds in duration. I recommend that you conduct some research on the app before adding information in. If you have any questions, feel free to reply to this message. Thanks! 725:

Please refrain from embedding links to BOOKMYSHOW.COM as this is a promotional link and not a reliable source. Furthermore, please do not mark edits as minor when making changes of substance. This is reserved for actual minor edits, such as a spelling

297:

Hello Justlookingforthemoment, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG). While we appreciate your contributions to Knowledge (XXG), there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

2382:

I don't revert "all your edits" - don't be silly. Some of the edits you make are poor, and I sometimes revert or alter some of them if I notice. The particular one about which you are whining is poor, as is a lot of the gratuitous tagging you do (see

980:

and cite the sources of the article. Copyright violations are often speedily deleted. For the pdf, the website states: "Website Content Managed by © Content Owned by Union Public Service", and there is no indication otherwise in the document itself.

1170:

What do you mean? Can you please elaborate on the thing which you are speaking about i.e. disclosing personal info on WP? Also, I asked you the question because I saw you intervened in many of the edits I made to some Indian articles, like

1258: 434:

Also note that Knowledge (XXG) articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Knowledge (XXG) project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in

2869: 2797: 2709: 2619: 2461: 2269: 243:. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed. All content you add to Knowledge (XXG) must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — 272:

are not really encyclopedic. Maybe you should make tables of the all time highest grossing apps or something interesting to readers. I was just going to delete the tables but I thought I would let you know why.

1995:

How are you unilaterally reverting 2,8xx bits and calling them "unneeded"? I believe some discussion should be done on the talk page before you unilaterally revert a few peoples edits with a blanket statement.

959:

I'm replying here to keep the conversation in one place. All of the questions you ask are answered in the links in the messages which I and others have given you above. I suggest you read them. In particular:

985:

assume that text and images you find on the internet are protected by copyright unless very clearly stated otherwise, and even on the very rare occasions they are not, copying large portions word for word is

842:

introduce or reintroduce copyright violating material to this or any other page on wikipedia. To reiterate: Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy

2545: 2514: 2340:, hence I had put that tag at the top of the section. If you have any problem/suggestion regarding it, please put up a message on my Talk page, but please respect the fact that I had put up the tag in 2781:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2693:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2603:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2445:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2253:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2189:

Wow, not so considerate of you to send me a message so soon, when you saw that I was online at that time, editing. I just wanted to add links to those terms because many people are unfamiliar with

2201:, and realized that it would not work, as the type expected only "orbter" and "lander", and was just on the verge of reverting those edits, when this message suddenly popped up. Huh! So sad! 2396:. If you don't want your edits reverting in future then actually read the reasons your edits are reverted, and act on them - and don't be so belligerent - it's mildly annoying. Thank you. -- 2766: 2678: 2589: 2431: 2239: 1589:: particularly, what level of prose, sourcing, etc. are required for an article to be considered a GA, which are not the same as what a random editor might consider "good" for an article. 1881:

Hi, I am sorry if I did that, but I just converted the types of mutual masturbation into bullets, since I felt it looked better. Can you please explain me kindly how this is related to

2163: 135: 1628:

felt met the criteria, nominated them. But do not just blindly revert them, do consider at least once in reviewing those articles, some of them I feel may pass the review and become

142:. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Knowledge (XXG): 2549: 1297:

Also, I have seen that you have tried to insert copyrighted sources onto Knowledge (XXG). Note that there are many laws that prohibit that, and I recommend that you review what

1151:

Free advice - if people don't prominently disclose personal details on wikipedia that might be because they want to keep them private, and some don't like to be asked, so beware.

644: 2309:

It was simply a case issue, it was lower case and should have been upper. It's always best to try to fix these problems, not delete a source and leave an unsourced statement.

1815:

have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on

2529: 2525: 2502: 2498: 640: 892:, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy 799:, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy 601:, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy 2336:, The "Diagnosis" section really contained extremely few references, with large portions of text and some sections completely unreferenced. Since WP believes in 643:. While Knowledge (XXG) welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying 388:

copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See

2387:). What's impractical about explaining your tag on the talk page? That's the sensible thing to do, and what any reasonable person would do if they'd been asked 2147: 1194: 1099: 1053: 948: 139: 74: 1038:, so that I may improve my editing skills. Also, do send me tips and tricks for editing. It seems you are an experienced user, and may guide me on this site. 2537: 2510: 2877:

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit

2857: 1598:

Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination.

961: 900: 876: 807: 783: 609: 585: 176: 1957: 880: 787: 589: 389: 2533: 2506: 816:

Quite aside from the fact that there is insufficient independently sourced notability for this topic, the edit removing the redirect introduced so much

751: 187: 825: 2853: 523: 493: 2167: 156: 1729: 440: 239:

Some of the content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a

1220:

template is a bit unwieldy for talk page discussions, breaking up the format as it does, particularly for just one sentence. You might prefer

408: 2553: 668: 2541: 1732:

for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.

1719: 1554:

for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.

1541: 1499:

for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.

1486: 447:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be

2820: 2732: 2642: 2483: 2362:

tag at each and every line of that section, which is impractical and impossible and would not at all look good. I had just put up a simple

2291: 1974: 1965: 2159: 1232:, clearly distinguishing the quoted text without breaking up the paragraph. That's only for talk page use, of course, not in articles. -- 1624:

I, am sorry that I should have left a message on that talk page for the nomination, but I did not do that. Instead, whichever articles

1715: 1708: 1660: 1653: 1251:

Hello Justlookingforthemoment, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

1172: 930: 868: 775: 233: 66: 32: 1601:

for at least seven days, if the consensus at the end is that the article is ready to be nominated, by all means do so at that time.

542:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 2033: 1961: 651:

working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you.

468:

the information in your own words. It has to be completely your own, not just changing a few things here and there - that's called

994: 990: 350: 1677:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1444:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1389:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

907:

You have been warned about this several times by various editors/administrators, yet you have continued. Please consider this a

240: 171: 2816: 2728: 2638: 2479: 2287: 1812: 472:. I see you've been warned about this before, please don't do this again. It's a good way to be blocked from further editing. 2790: 2702: 2612: 2454: 2262: 534: 511: 497: 454: 338: 161: 732: 720: 716: 319: 2849: 2834: 2174:

for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

747: 708: 539: 315: 2368: 2345: 2202: 2122: 2037: 1989: 1933: 1914: 1886: 1633: 1345: 1186: 1091: 1045: 1034:)? Why? Well, I have no problem if you do that, but please do guide me properly, and if possible send me messages in my 1031: 940: 77: 2861: 1855: 1007: 913: 895: 846: 802: 604: 469: 448: 2878: 2802: 2714: 2624: 2466: 2274: 1843: 1820: 993:

for details of how copyright violations are dealt with, including blocking of persistent violators. Particularly see

712: 1621:

discussion process. That will make the nomination delay by a long time. So, is there any other alternative for that?

972:

copy text from other sources into Knowledge (XXG). Doing so is a copyright violation and may constitute plagiarism.

826:

http://indiaeducationdiary.in/200-school-students-across-india-participate-20th-amity-national-mathematics-workshop/

457: 427:

confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see

1788: 1263:

If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at

198: 31:

Hello, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG). This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to

1851: 1780: 1704: 1649: 1526: 1471: 1416: 1361: 385: 346: 2198: 1866: 728: 700: 262: 151: 146: 59: 2557: 1748: 1693: 1570: 1515: 1460: 1405: 2778: 2690: 2600: 2442: 2250: 1978: 648: 436: 194: 1332: 1311: 1252: 1245: 1970: 1182: 1087: 1041: 936: 872: 779: 581: 451:

from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page.

428: 361: 357: 514:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done for the following reason:

465: 412: 202: 183: 2315: 2105:

it/them. Blanking is not a constructive option and looks very much done to attempt to make some sort of

2086: 2065: 1784: 1610: 219: 190:

using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

103: 416: 1862: 483: 138:, Justlookingforthemoment. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for 92: 2760: 2672: 2583: 2425: 2384: 2233: 2171: 817: 680: 2888: 2194: 1828: 1816: 1744: 1739: 1689: 1684: 1566: 1561: 1511: 1506: 1456: 1451: 1401: 1396: 1176: 278: 2774: 2686: 2596: 2438: 2337: 2246: 2082: 1882: 2344:, and hence, stop targeting my edits and reverting those with useless opinions of yours. Thanks! 1551: 1327: 1306: 750:

information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Knowledge (XXG) about

557: 2106: 1668: 1586: 1435: 1380: 911:. Any further copyright violations of any kind are very likely to result in your account being 2179: 672: 620: 251: 2786: 2698: 2608: 2450: 2258: 1593: 829: 549: 2809: 2721: 2631: 2473: 2398: 2310: 2281: 2111: 2058: 1904: 1606: 1234: 1128: 1067: 1013: 919: 852: 760: 685: 653: 577: 2789:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2782: 2701:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2694: 2611:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2604: 2550:

wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 July 14#Infobox Assam Vidhan Sabha constituency

2453:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2446: 2393: 2341: 2261:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2254: 453:

Hi, you've copied and pasted material from the 2019 brochure (one copy found online here -

2892: 2824: 2736: 2646: 2561: 2487: 2402: 2376: 2353: 2318: 2295: 2210: 2183: 2130: 2115: 2093: 2070: 2045: 2018: 2015: 1982: 1941: 1927: 1922: 1908: 1899: 1894: 1870: 1832: 1792: 1752: 1697: 1641: 1614: 1574: 1519: 1464: 1409: 1353: 1337: 1316: 1280: 1275: 1238: 1212:

it's also rarely relevant in the context of editing the encyclopedia. As a side note, the

1198: 1132: 1103: 1071: 1057: 1017: 952: 923: 856: 764: 736: 689: 657: 624: 561: 487: 476: 334: 282: 255: 226: 209: 110: 96: 88: 48: 44: 36: 1664: 1431: 1376: 345:.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to 311: 371:

own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you

2883: 2155: 1824: 1808: 1776: 1496: 1265: 1215: 676: 667:

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Knowledge (XXG), as you did to

307: 274: 121: 306:

amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double

2151: 1847: 1537: 1530: 1427: 1420: 929:

Hi Begoon, This is with regard to the message you sent me today regarding my edit at

553: 381: 342: 166: 1322:

Also: Don't forget to sign your posts. This can be done by inserting four tildes (

2175: 1735: 1680: 1557: 1502: 1447: 1392: 1080:

Oh! Thanks, I'll keep a check on that. Anyways, an off-topic question, but are you

711:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to 704: 613: 244: 2751: 2663: 2575: 2417: 2225: 1724: 1546: 1491: 1333: 1312: 1257:

none of those criteria apply. Also not sufficiently similar to version deleted at

742: 663: 47:, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please 715:

and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the

518:

The people who were getting married arent exactly notable, but their parents are.

1918: 1223: 863: 770: 755: 572: 538:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

2036:

agreed to keep only the 2 parties, BJP and INC and not anything else. Thanks!

2027: 1998: 1302: 1270: 1259:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of IIT JEE Toppers (3rd nomination)

330: 52: 2331: 1482: 1475: 1372: 1365: 1298: 832:

and other sources that it is impossible to clean up without a total rewrite.

423:

be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you

2870:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of Indian Premier League umpires

1255:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 1659:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

1426:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

1371:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

719:

tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on

2793:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2705:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2615:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2457:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2265:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2142: 1811:. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to 1803: 1605:

inevitable problems aren't corrected. Thank you for your understanding.

879:

from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read

786:

from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read

695: 635: 588:

from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read

55:, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again. 24: 2770:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2682:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2593:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2435:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2392:

explanation there again... mind blowingly unhelpful - you need to read

2243:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2190: 675:. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been 341:. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, 127: 1673: 1440: 1385: 1269:. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. 529:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

1860:

Do not introduce your own personal comment to a encyclopedia article.

1291: 1030:

I see, that you are keeping a check on each and every edit of mine (

1917:, my apologies for the warning, I have restored the edit. Pinging 1081: 821: 2806:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2718:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2628:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2470:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2278:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 526:, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time. 197:! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on 2796:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

2764:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

2708:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

2676:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

2618:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

2546:

Template:Infobox Indian state legislative assembly constituency

2515:

Template:Infobox Indian state legislative assembly constituency

2460:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

2268:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

2587:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

2429:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

2146:

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of

884:

You may use external websites or publications as a source of

791:

You may use external websites or publications as a source of

703:. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 593:

You may use external websites or publications as a source of

399:(that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it 2856:, is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to 995:

Knowledge (XXG):Copyright_violations#Addressing contributors

639:

I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article,

544: 502: 419:

before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources

125:

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

23: 349:

the information and to demonstrate that the content is not

325:

Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information

2358:

And yes, as per your explanation, you want me to put up a

830:

http://www.ncbe.nic.in/userpanel/centralliststateview.aspx

548:, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 403:

be possible to include greater portions of a source text.

2158:. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our 2237:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

679:. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the 35:

has been undone by an automated computer program called

2848:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2777: