User talk:Ka Faraq Gatri - Knowledge (XXG)

2104:

appear as though the editors who reviewed the page took much care in researching it. Furthermore, there are articles on Knowledge (XXG) itself that reference pages written by our members on our website. We also do a fair bit of publishing, which can be verified with a quick search on Amazon.com - we are listed as a non-profit organization by the Oregon Secretary of State, where our headquarters resides. Quite frankly, I am disappointed that an organization that does the sort of work we do would be so easily blown off by your editors with so little research. The subject matter "Thelema" is subject to great political bias and manipulation by some Knowledge (XXG) editors who are members of a supposed competing organization. If you allow that sort of manipulation to continue, Knowledge (XXG) will no longer be a source of unbiased factual information.

2078:

historical in it's own right, totally uncommerical (run by a charity with zero governmental or commercial sponsorship) and the people who support it are all volunteers. There is intention to build up a historical account of Llandudno Lifeboat over the past 150 years outlining the high numbers of lives saved and rescues undertaken and including the injuries and fatalities to crew and helpers. Llandudno as a town should obviously link to this page, as should the RNLI and some of the boats (such as the Mersea link already added). Please leave this as an entry in it's own right. Also, many thanks for your editing and adding of further information, it has really added to the entry

2800: 2223: 1923: 1667: 1543: 1432: 892: 823: 2575: 1255: 759: 167: 1070:. I dropped a note on their talk page to ask them to write in English and to suggest that they might also like to consider to contributing to the appropriate language version of wikipedia. They've continued to add non-English text to the article. I'm concerned that they may not have understood my note. Is there somewhere I can ask for someone to drop a note to them in their language? 2732: 2168: 2015: 2387: 2655: 2107:

I am asking you to reconsider reversing the decision to delete, and perhaps spend a little time understanding the sort of work that we have done, and continue to do for the greater good in the name of our chosen spiritual paradigm. If I have not followed the procedure to contest deletions properly, I

2036:

is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us

737:

articles. The bottom of the wiki page says that the content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 but there's no actual permissions listed on the picture itself. Can I download this and upload it to Commons or do I need to contact the editors of that wiki? If I can upload it straight to Commons, what do

2332:

is asking rather a lot of someone in her position - but I think your help in getting what she's really trying to say into acceptably-referenced shape will help her with getting perspective too. Well done to U sez I!! - I'm a bit too new to be much direct help with the things that have been baulking

428:

and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund

2077:

Hi, Have consulted a few local people and the feeling is that the llandudno Lifeboat page should not be merged. Llandudno as a town is pushing itself commercially and quite a few entries appear to be driven by commercial interest rather than presenting facts and information IMO. The lifeboat is

361:

still a matter of concern, even if the creator asserts that he was the original author. We need to verify this. Since we don't require verification of identity at account creation, the similarity of username is insufficient to ensure that no copyright violation is taking place. I need to ask you,

254:

I would be glad to look it over. I have over 200 books and about 500 articles on regular Rosicrucian philosophy so surely I can find something. Do you know anything about the Medieval Academy of America. As a noted learned society, it should have a lot more than one paragraph. I will work on that

2103:

On the deletion page some one noted that our non-profit, tax-exempt organization is a "blatant hoax" as if the organization didn't exist. As the CEO of this organization, which works along side of The Red Cross and *many* other charities, I take exception to this (as would the IRS) as it doesn't

576:) Thank you for you help in tidying up my contributions. I have undone what you did as two relevant articles were deleted in relation to relationship. I cant seem to work out how to tidy up the very bottom reference to make it sit at No5 in the reference list. I'm new granted but its baffling. 1180:. The story is being run on a couple of news sites which appear to be feeding off the ESPN information. We've got well meaning people editing the article accordingly. Is this sufficient coverage to tag the article as a recent death or do we need to wait for a bit more confirmation? 2429:). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely 2301:

Can you please use your Admin powers to permanently Block IP Address: 67.135.156.11 You have warned this school on previous occasions, and the abuse just doesn't stop. I'm getting tired of finding their vandalisum all over wiki and having to undo their handy work. Enough is enough.

1780:

Thanks for your message. I have rewritten them somewhat more. It is difficult to completely rewrite them though, since all of these descriptions tend to have the same structure and use some specialist terms which cannot be rewritten. I hope they are okay like this. Cheers!

362:

though, the degree to which this article violates copyright. I cannot access the source. Are you able to see it enough to assert with confident that it is a copyright violation? If so, I will need to advise the creator how to proceed with verifying permission.

281: 2587:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

423:

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to

2433:

edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I

2773:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.

2328:'s doing something important, that can't be at all easy in itself, and has been having a lot of unavoidable difficulty with sources . . and a very avoidable total lack of support from anyone . . until you got onto it! Obviously 1273:, and for your subsequent efforts to resolve the concerns presented by the user. People like you make WikiProjects a delight to work with, and help us focus on solving the problem, rather than assigning the blame. 2615: 1797: 2530:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1627:

link at the bottom of the new page after you've done checking the article. This saves time and work by informing fellow patrollers of your review of the page, so that they do not duplicate efforts. Thanks!

546:

Did you read the crap you reverted to? Not that I blame you, there was vandalism there, too, but that article was an absolute mess. I re-removed all of the garbage and have nominated it for deletion.

378:

The rest of the article is a cut and paste from a section labelled 'Diagnosis' in the original text. References to a Table and figures included in the original have been removed. Hope that's helpful.

1963: 2443: 1746:

Hey, someone just found some sources that verified this place exists. Page needs cleanup, but it definitely exists. Do you have any objections if I speedily kept and closed the deletion discussion?

2599:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2446:, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! 1270: 697:{{Citation | last = Smith | first = John | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century | publication-date = 2001 | publisher = ] | page = 125 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4 }} </ref: --> 999:

into an article about another upcoming comic. I changed that one back to a redirect for the same reasons that I PRODed Batman Incorporated but I'm now wondering if that was a wise thing....

2814: 2257: 2173: 1894: 500:

Hello Ka Faraq Gatri, I came across you in recent changes, and noticed that you've been doing quite a lot of vandal-reverting using the undo feature. Would you like me to grant your account

2422: 375:

OK, the first paragraph is a straight cut and paste from the article abstract. Hopefully you should be able to verify this without having to have a subscription to the journal concerned.

365:

I am watching your talk page, so you may respond to me here. Otherwise, if you place your response at the Copyright Problems entry, I will also see it. Thanks for any help you can give! --

1360:

Hi just writing to let you know this is a shared company IP address and the recent vandalism is being looked into internally. Thanks for posting on the talk page so that it was noticed.

2100:

My name is Gerald del Campo. I am the CEO of The Order of Thelemic Knights, which apparently had a page on Knowledge (XXG) that was taken down in 2011. I have just become aware of this.

1856: 394:

Thank you. If it were only a few lines, we could easily rewrite those. If it involves the entire article here, then it's best to blank it pending verification of permission. --

350: 1121:

You are right, he was just adding translations of the existing text, not new material. I left him a message explaining that he can add that to the Chinese article instead.

1619:

Hello, Ka Faraq Gatri. I just wanted to stop by to thank you for your help with the vital work of patrolling new pages, and ask if you might make sure to "mark" pages as

2369:

You proposed a merjer. I completed it. You can follow that link to undo the merjer, pull data from the orijinal article, or ensure that it iz not a double-redirection.

2487:, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on 2751: 2747: 1392:. I regard this as one of the more important areas of information on Knowledge (XXG), and the image assists a great deal in bringing out the nature of the subject. -- 181:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s 1620: 582: 1328: 2425:, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $ 20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day ( 1642:

Will do. I don't drop in to new page patrol very often. I think that was the only one I looked at so I don't think many articles got looked at twice.

212:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

2721: 217: 2480: 1897:

that your hook might be suitable to be included on the April Fools DYKs. Could you leave a comment there to let us know what you think? Thanks,

596:

It looks like the file was deleted, so I can't check exactly what you mean - but I guess it was an 'inline reference', explained below. Cheers,

1388: 2819: 2755: 515: 2758:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under 2355: 1324: 591:

signs) at the end. This will add your name, and the date and time. You can also do this by clicking the 'sign' button, pictured to the right.

2629: 2555: 186: 26: 2143: 2062: 2151: 1407:

Thanks. I was thinking of maybe adding a taxobox as well. Not quite sure what IUCN rating to give it, though. Maybe vulnerable. ;)

1367: 504:

to make vandal-reverting easier for you? Just remember that rolback should be used to revert vandalism. Tell me what you think. Thanks.

1316: 182: 2743: 2484: 2324:

I've added a long note to the Talk-page with some thoughts which I hope are useful - but the main thing is a thankyou to you. I feel

2677: 2642: 221: 2318: 1215:

Thanks for categorizing missing rhodophyta articles and project tagging the talk pages. It's lonely in the red algae articles. --

2673: 2196: 1017:

sounds like it's going to have a specific flavour - the original Batman recruiting/drafting international counter parts - where

48: 2625: 2551: 2608: 915:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 846:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 43: 2442:

page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the

2276: