242:
25:
529:
275:. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Knowledge’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Knowledge administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
561:
381:
750:
and it was not confirmed as a reliable source. I was quoting the Wiki
Project since other editors used it to justify other sources used in the article. If you say it's not the point of truth, I am ok with it. However, then we will have to reclassify a lot of sources referred to it. Should we take all
765:
The WikiProject may be useful insofar as it gives the opinions of some editors, however I'd note that what I saw just from looking at a screen full was a bunch of discussions with extremely limited participation. I don't know that it's particularly useful for determining community consensus. Now at
699:
removing sourced material, where the author is a subject matter expert, with edit summaries such as "Removed newly added content since there is no agreement that the source is reliable in RSN" is disruptive. Your subjective view that there was no consensus does not make a source unreliable. Further
680:
Thank you both for your comments. I was warned of edit waring earlier and there for careful. I didn't think the content changes I did fall under edit waring since I gave exact reasons for newly added content removal. However, I feel Oz346's revert with accusations against me is both disruptive and
306:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics
701:
183:
533:
74:
747:
69:
89:
84:
79:
774:
the reliability is clear and no one in talk disagrees. Please also note that BRD is an explanatory essay and is not compulsory. The compulsory policies are
99:
104:
430:, thank you for bringing this to my attention. However I feel that you are equally guilty since you have reverted three times withing a 24 hour period
140:
44:
572:. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
615:
501:
I wondered if you might be open to speaking to me about sock-puppet accusations on
Knowledge? I'm not sure how to message Wiki editors though!
735:
408:
158:
606:
to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
154:
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
738:
state that content that has been added if contested needs to be agreed on and although reliability sourced material needs included with
411:
to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.---
94:
315:
203:
388:
several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
359:, thank you for letting me know. Please let me know any non-constructive edits I have done. So I can avoid such in the future.
176:
62:
704:
is not the point of truth on whether community consensus determines sources to be reliable or not. Such discussion occur at
611:
577:
199:
621:
479:, are you saying that what you did was correct? As you may say please show me the Knowledge policy that says so.
746:
says that the editor who introduce the content needs to prove that the source is reliable, I took the source to
739:
151:
Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
743:
636:
632:
628:
607:
565:
537:
389:
322:
545:
506:
466:
416:
124:
532:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
502:
671:
812:
752:
696:
682:
584:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
581:
573:
494:
480:
454:
440:
404:
400:
360:
311:
220:
162:
805:
784:
731:
710:
645:
356:
334:
112:
169:
148:
51:
775:
541:
498:
476:
462:
427:
412:
666:
A series of consecutive edits only counts as one revert, for the purposes of the 3RR rule.
457:
My reverts are within the limits and they were justified as you yourself have now admitted
137:
41:
667:
603:
396:
256:
384:
Hi
Kalanishashika! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
569:
385:
241:
767:
705:
640:
32:
779:
771:
318:. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the
271:
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as
820:
799:
760:
725:
690:
675:
660:
549:
510:
488:
470:
448:
420:
368:
349:
228:
208:
639:
you've made three reverts within 24 hours. Please be mindful not to violate
250:
182:
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our
299:
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
592:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
380:
22:
196:
175:
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a
395:
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article
602:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
189:
Have fun! Your presence in the
Knowledge community is welcome.
808:, I agree with you, and have mentioned this in the talk page
392:
disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
23:
742:, relevant information should go to the relevant article.
260:. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and
766:
the same time I wouldn't suggest taking every source to
536:
regarding a possible violation of
Knowledge's policy on
809:
458:
437:
434:
431:
161:. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is
702:
770:
because there may be sources which upon a reading of
119:
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
314:or you may learn more about this contentious topic
293:
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
131:
597:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
534:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
734:, I agree on all points mentioned above. Doesn't
286:, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
266:imply that there are any issues with your editing
58:Learn everything you need to know to get started.
296:follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
278:Within contentious topics, editors should edit
523:Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
8:
159:discuss the issue at the article's talk page
248:You have recently edited a page related to
614:. In some cases, it may be appropriate to
568:according to the reverts you have made on
564:You currently appear to be engaged in an
157:If an edit you make is reverted, you can
681:uncivil. Hope you could look into it.
736:Knowledge:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
7:
618:. If you engage in an edit war, you
290:adhere to the purposes of Knowledge;
811:. So don't want to repeat it here.
235:Introduction to contentious topics
14:
616:request temporary page protection
559:
527:
403:. If you are unable to agree at
379:
240:
138:
42:
459:you cited the wrong explanation
312:arbitration clerks' noticeboard
302:refrain from gaming the system.
576:with others, to avoid editing
511:02:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
34:Welcome to Knowledge, the 💕.
1:
186:and disclose your connection.
63:Introduction to contributing
847:
461:to support your revert.---
409:dispute resolution options
184:conflict of interest guide
821:15:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
800:12:53, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
761:12:01, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
726:04:33, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
691:16:26, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
676:15:28, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
661:09:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
550:12:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
489:14:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
471:10:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
449:03:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
421:14:33, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
816:
756:
686:
582:try to reach a consensus
484:
444:
407:, please use one of the
369:15:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
364:
350:15:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
310:you may ask them at the
254:, a topic designated as
224:
172:to explain your changes.
149:Don't be afraid to edit!
744:Knowledge:Verifiability
637:Special:Diff/1230185235
633:Special:Diff/1230184834
629:Special:Diff/1230184596
608:appropriate noticeboard
229:05:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
209:05:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
198:Happy editing! Cheers,
90:Policies and guidelines
200:Pharaoh of the Wizards
30:Hello, Kalanishashika!
28:
27:
405:Talk:Tamil genocide
390:edit warring policy
612:dispute resolution
285:
281:
273:contentious topics
265:
29:
751:of these to RSN?
740:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
495:Kalanishashikaand
283:
279:
263:
132:
120:
59:
838:
708:. Kind Regards,
587:Points to note:
563:
562:
540:. Thank you.
531:
530:
399:to try to reach
383:
375:Edit war warning
327:
321:
244:
211:
142:
141:
130:
118:
57:
46:
45:
26:
846:
845:
841:
840:
839:
837:
836:
835:
560:
557:
528:
525:
377:
331:
330:
325:
319:
245:
237:
216:
215:
214:
213:
207:
194:
193:
192:
177:reliable source
144:
139:
135:
134:
126:The Task Center
109:
105:Manual of Style
65:
48:
47:Getting Started
43:
37:
36:
31:
24:
19:
12:
11:
5:
844:
842:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
813:Kalanishashika
753:Kalanishashika
697:Kalanishashika
683:Kalanishashika
600:
599:
594:
570:Tamil genocide
556:
553:
524:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
481:Kalanishashika
455:Kalanishashika
441:Kalanishashika
386:Tamil genocide
376:
373:
372:
371:
361:Kalanishashika
304:
303:
300:
297:
294:
291:
284:constructively
267:
246:
239:
238:
236:
233:
232:
231:
221:Kalanishashika
195:
191:
190:
187:
180:
173:
170:edit summaries
166:
155:
152:
145:
136:
129:
122:
117:
110:
108:
107:
102:
97:
92:
87:
82:
77:
72:
66:
61:
56:
49:
40:
39:
38:
21:
20:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
843:
822:
818:
814:
810:
807:
806:TarnishedPath
803:
802:
801:
798:
797:
796:
793:
790:
787:
781:
777:
773:
769:
764:
763:
762:
758:
754:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
732:TarnishedPath
729:
728:
727:
724:
723:
722:
719:
716:
713:
707:
703:
698:
694:
693:
692:
688:
684:
679:
678:
677:
673:
669:
665:
664:
663:
662:
659:
658:
657:
654:
651:
648:
643:
642:
638:
634:
630:
625:
624:from editing.
623:
617:
613:
609:
605:
598:
595:
593:
590:
589:
588:
585:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
554:
552:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
522:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
491:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
473:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
438:
435:
432:
429:
425:
424:
423:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
393:
391:
387:
382:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
357:TarnishedPath
354:
353:
352:
351:
348:
347:
346:
343:
340:
337:
329:
324:
323:Ctopics/aware
317:
313:
309:
301:
298:
295:
292:
289:
288:
287:
276:
274:
269:
261:
259:
258:
253:
252:
243:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
217:
212:
210:
205:
201:
188:
185:
181:
178:
174:
171:
167:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
146:
133:
128:
127:
121:
116:
115:
106:
103:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
81:
78:
76:
73:
71:
68:
67:
64:
60:
55:
54:
35:
16:
794:
791:
788:
785:
783:
720:
717:
714:
711:
709:
655:
652:
649:
646:
644:
626:
619:
601:
596:
591:
586:
578:disruptively
558:
538:edit warring
526:
394:
378:
344:
341:
338:
335:
333:
332:
307:
305:
277:
272:
270:
255:
249:
247:
197:
125:
123:
114:The Teahouse
113:
111:
52:
50:
33:
574:collaborate
542:Petextrodon
503:Margimurphy
499:Petextrodon
477:Petextrodon
463:Petextrodon
428:Petextrodon
413:Petextrodon
328:template.
257:contentious
219:Thank you.
168:Always use
75:Referencing
668:Walsh90210
397:talk pages
308:procedures
100:Navigating
95:Talk pages
776:WP:EPTALK
604:talk page
580:, and to
555:June 2024
493:Hi both @
401:consensus
280:carefully
251:Sri Lanka
163:consensus
610:or seek
566:edit war
53:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
622:blocked
620:may be
70:Editing
768:WP:RSN
706:WP:RSN
641:WP:3RR
85:Tables
80:Images
780:WP:EW
772:WP:RS
627:With
262:does
817:talk
795:Path
778:and
757:talk
721:Path
687:talk
672:talk
656:Path
635:and
546:talk
507:talk
485:talk
467:talk
445:talk
417:talk
365:talk
345:Path
316:here
282:and
225:talk
204:talk
143:Tips
792:hed
789:nis
786:Tar
748:RSN
718:hed
715:nis
712:Tar
653:hed
650:nis
647:Tar
342:hed
339:nis
336:Tar
264:not
819:)
782:.
759:)
689:)
674:)
631:,
548:)
509:)
487:)
469:)
447:)
439:.
436:,
433:,
419:)
367:)
326:}}
320:{{
268:.
227:)
206:)
815:(
804:@
755:(
730:@
695:@
685:(
670:(
544:(
505:(
497:@
483:(
475:@
465:(
453:@
443:(
426:@
415:(
363:(
355:@
223:(
202:(
179:.
165:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
