25:
by simply stating what degrees she really does hold and what background she does have. You could say something along the lines of "Ms. Brown describes herself as a
Criminal Profiler and as such she appears frequently on the cable news channels offering her expert opinions on crimes in the news. However, unlike Cliff Van Zandt, RObert Ressler and John Douglas, who also appear on such shows in their capacity as Profilers, Ms. Brown has no history of service with any law enforcement agency either State, County, Municipal or Federal." See how that kinda of gets the point across?
29:
if other notable people have called them outragious, then cite that person. You could say "On such and such date, Pat brown said of such and such person or crime... blah blah blah." You can then go on to say "This statement was called ___ by name of notable person." By the way, refering to her as a talking head isn't negative or postive, it is merely descriptive which is why I sued it on the disambiguation page.
143:
82:
203:
302:
28:
Just put her credentials up as they are and let the readers decide is she's qualified. if she's made some seriously outragious statements,m and it appears she has, you can include some of them but keep them brief and make sure you cite the references. Don't characterize them in any way yourself but
24:
You may wish to edit this article with an eye towards removing some of the POV statements. While I agree that Ms. Brown is not particualry well-informed, Knowledge is supposed to be a neutral encyclopedia. If you want to show that she isn't an FBI trained profiler, you can do that in a neutral way
47:
Further to this discussion, here is a link to an article about a book by Brent Truvey, another self-described criminal profiler. At least Truvey is attempting, in his book, to suggest that some set of standards be applied to the growing field. You might find this an interesting
175:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any
114:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any
171:
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
110:
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
320:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
317:
164:
if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on
Knowledge (see
103:
if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on
Knowledge (see
160:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
99:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
266:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
32:
Good luck with the article. Remember, articles without cited sources often get nominated for deletion. it also helps to wikilink where appropriate
271:
180:
119:
172:
111:
236:
275:
240:
54:
American
Journal of Psychiatry's review of Criminal Profiling: An Introduction to Behavioral Evidence Analysis by Brent Turvey
325:
287:
18:
210:
165:
104:
313:
244:
321:
283:
152:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
91:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
217:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
316:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at
148:
65:
37:
260:
87:
223:
309:
279:
252:
214:
259:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
61:
53:
33:
157:
96:
188:
127:
267:
161:
100:
202:
153:
92:
142:
81:
235:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy
Knowledge's
227:
301:
184:
123:
329:
291:
192:
131:
69:
41:
300:
270:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
201:
247:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
239:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
179:will be deleted after seven days, as described on
118:will be deleted after seven days, as described on
60:this should give you some ideas for the article.
137:Orphaned non-free media (Image:061508 16221.jpg)
318:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Pitts-burgher
8:
76:Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rat Day.jpg)
213:template has been added to the article
7:
312:, an article that you created, for
198:Proposed deletion of Pitts-burgher
14:
141:
80:
297:AfD nomination of Pitts-burgher
1:
292:14:35, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
278:, where it may be deleted if
166:our policy for non-free media
105:our policy for non-free media
70:00:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
42:00:40, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
19:Pat Brown (Criminal Profiler)
330:15:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
193:03:56, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
181:criteria for speedy deletion
120:criteria for speedy deletion
245:Knowledge's deletion policy
222:Unremarkable sandwich (see
156:. However, it is currently
95:. However, it is currently
345:
268:proposed deletion process
132:05:27, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
272:speedy deletion criteria
305:
282:to delete is reached.
237:criteria for inclusion
206:
149:Image:061508 16221.jpg
304:
276:Articles for Deletion
274:or it can be sent to
241:What Knowledge is not
205:
146:Thanks for uploading
85:Thanks for uploading
322:Delicious carbuncle
284:Delicious carbuncle
162:You may add it back
101:You may add it back
306:
207:
308:I have nominated
211:proposed deletion
154:claim of fair use
93:claim of fair use
88:Image:Rat Day.jpg
336:
258:
257:
251:
173:my contributions
145:
112:my contributions
84:
344:
343:
339:
338:
337:
335:
334:
333:
299:
255:
249:
248:
200:
139:
78:
22:
12:
11:
5:
342:
340:
298:
295:
233:
232:
199:
196:
138:
135:
77:
74:
73:
72:
57:
56:
50:
49:
21:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
341:
332:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
310:Pitts-burgher
303:
296:
294:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
264:
262:
261:its talk page
254:
246:
242:
238:
231:
229:
225:
224:WP:NOTABILITY
220:
219:
218:
216:
215:Pitts-burgher
212:
204:
197:
195:
194:
190:
186:
183:. Thank you.
182:
178:
174:
169:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
150:
144:
136:
134:
133:
129:
125:
122:. Thank you.
121:
117:
113:
108:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
83:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
58:
55:
52:
51:
46:
45:
44:
43:
39:
35:
30:
26:
20:
16:
307:
265:
234:
221:
208:
176:
170:
147:
140:
115:
109:
86:
79:
31:
27:
23:
253:dated prod
17:regarding
280:consensus
314:deletion
177:articles
158:orphaned
116:articles
97:orphaned
62:LiPollis
34:LiPollis
243:" and
185:BJBot
124:BJBot
48:read:
326:talk
288:talk
228:WP:V
226:and
189:talk
128:talk
66:talk
38:talk
168:).
107:).
328:)
290:)
263:.
256:}}
250:{{
209:A
191:)
130:)
68:)
40:)
324:(
286:(
230:)
187:(
126:(
64:(
36:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
