User talk:Kingboyk/Archive 17

2327:. Unfortunately, the cut and paste didn't preserve the tree structure, so it is no longer clear which articles are in which categories (the articles in the last subcategory of a parent category will be listed with the articles (if any) in the parent subcategory). I did save an HTML version of the expanded category tree, and that has the tree structure still there. Maybe there is a way of extracting the code so the levels in the tree structure can be parsed to get the list you ultimately want (including the correct category name). There were 935 articles in the Category Tree on people who died in or before 0 BC. If the list is useable, would you be able to tell me how many didn't have WP-BIO tags? 2190:(which would catch living people not in the deaths category). In fact, scanning the births category would catch all the living and dead people who had been categorised that way. I did a brief random look, and discovered several articles without WP-BIO tags, though maybe those are on your list of pending tagging? Anyway, do you need clean lists of those that definitely don't have tags, or is it enough to have a list of those that should have tags, and you (or rather AWB) can somehow detect if it has a tag already, and move onto the next one in the list? 3038:

handled properly (if fact I wish some of the ones I participate in would get closed as nicely:-D), so I was more aiming at his complaints about civility since that's easy enough to resolve (although I have another case where someone refuses to say "I'm sorry" for whatever reason) and since there is an established method for handling deletion disputes. So unless Seraphimblade thinks otherwise, I'm just going to write a little closing summary to the discussion and hopefully we're all good to go. Thanks and sorry again for all the irking:-P! -

2057:, I'm not questioning The Beatles success(whereas this is totally unrelated to the Beatles success) but it says their most successful period was with Brian, all i can see is The Beatles got £25 a week, again i can't see anything in the body but tell me if i missed something. I can let it slide for GA but for FA (which this article is basically ready for) it may come up, and hey at least i didn't fail it because "refs have too many numbers" or "not enough pictures" I'm open to discussion :) 2980:"Furthermore, what's with adding the list as a "see also" on every article about a person of mixed race hetitage? Why on earth would somebody reading about Mariane Pearl think "you know what, I'd love to read about other people of mixed race"? Is it such a defining characteristic that it's why folks would be reading about her in the first place? Of course not. So now I have to go remove all these red links! --kingboyk 16:44, 15 March 2007 (UTC) " 37: 501:}} for Firefox users, and maybe other browser, too. I use both Firefox 1.5 and 2.0 where skiptotoc doesn't work unless the To do section is visible, and then, of course, it brings you there, not to the page's Table of Contents. IE6 works when the To do is hidden, presumably because IE6 either goes to the second/last of the duplicates or picks the visible one over the invisible one. 2386:. The nice little template there allows all the year categories to be identified, but its over 100 that need removing from the "X deaths" categories. I don't have the time to do that (don't have AWB). Could you put this on a list somewhere? Maybe create "Animal deaths by year" as well, though I can't think of animals other than racehorses that would be recorded this way. 2629:(except when it crashes, of course!) so you can get a rough idea of the numbers from there. I'd estimate it's a couple of thousand so far, with several thousand more queued up; small beer compared to the 34,000 living people I tagged last month, but bear in mind I haven't got to the more recent deaths yet. (Currently at 12th century, with 13th to 16th queued up). -- 2675:. 19thC deaths has 24,000 articles in it's subcategories, about 3/4 of which so far are getting edited by my bot (476 processed, 112 skipped; 132 of those talk pages were empty (redlink)). I daresay 20th century, which I'm building now, will be bigger. Bear in mind, of course, that 24,000 is a drop in the ocean compared to the 150,000 or so in Living people! -- 4230: 4083: 3806: 3961:

is canvassing unless it is to a neutral board like VP or AN. Of course users will find out that a page they particularly like is up for consideration on their watchlists, but that is simply a common courtesy. It is entirely frustrating: I wish there were consensus to unilaterally remove such messages. Oh, and if someone comes here to adds

2471:

I suppose what I am looking for is an entire list of articles labelled with the WP-BIO tag, regardless of whether they are living or dead. What is the easiest way to generate that? Use "what links here" for the WP-BIO template tag (mainspace talk transclusions only), or is there a single category for

1006:

I note the generic template requires a few fields to work correctly - I've no problem with the 'attention=' field but the 'needs-infobox=' might cause some upset - I know there's quite a few architecture editors who are really opposed to the idea of infoboxes cluttering up their nicely designed pages

440:

We know about the redirects and they're in the regular expression which finds the template ("NovelsWikiProject|Novels|WPNovels") - but you're right to let me know about that just in case. The WPNovels message is only cosmetic but nonetheless wrong, it will be fixed in the next release (just done now,

3343:

her own article (which at the moment is a mess of redlinks, since as well as her "mainstream" work with the Ju Ju Babies, Dave Ball & Ed Ball she's been involved in some very iffy indie projects on the side). I've not made a separate article for The Grid & GDM yet, as they've stopped touring

3100:

widespread dissatisfaction with how things are going, no one is served by that keeping on simmering below the surface. I think there are some problematic issues that need addressing (I already removed a couple of comments from the front page that someone pointed out on AN, regarding lawyers and "not

2638:

Ah, but half those living people will be deemed non-notable after they die (and many before they die) and will be quietly consigned to the wiki-dustbin of history! :-) Though having said that, some of these dead people from hundreds of years ago are hardly any more interesting. I suppose our age, if

1031:

I'm off to bed, but a quick reply: for tagging with bot mode you don't need attention or infobox parameters. Glancing quickly at your template it seems fine for use as a "generic template". Yes, the other option is pretty much as you say. If you want me to provide a settings file I can do it but not

400:

Seems to be going extraordinarily well - don't know what we did without it. Plenty of work found to get on with now - as if we didn't before!. One more thing though in the Logs and on the "Novels" tab the tagging template is refered to as "WPNovels" when it should be "NovelsWikiProject". Please note

197:

Thanks, got things working and worked through a few single examples - then set up a "stub" and was mystified to see it "start itself" before I was quite ready. However everything appears to be working fine and I left it to run as it was doing such a good job. Why the auto start though? In know it is

4407:

If you were wanting to replace the template my plugin could probably do it. Since you want to remove them, no it can't. However, standard AWB ought to be up to the job. You'll need a regular expression to match the templates you're deleting, and replace that regular expression with an empty string.

3960:

On several XfDs I have been essentially flamed for protesting what I considered to be inappropriate and partisan canvassing. Of course on the AMA MfD but also on a conspiracy-theory AfD (that I can remember). Upon thinking about it, I don't think that people realize that, essentially, any message

3382:

Sorry to be naive but I don't understand this comment as it pertains to Arbitration. Perhaps there is a distinction between "Troll" and "Sock Puppet"? And how does the unfair elite come in? Maybe I am not following the postings carefully enough. I'm not understanding your comment. Could you explain

3037:

Well, I'm very very new to all this AMA stuff and I'm doing my best NOT to act like a lawyer (which is a tad against my nature since I'm studying to become one:-P). In general, I'm doing my best to just point people in the right direction and just get people talking. Personally, I think the AfD was

2448:

It is a big task, isn't it. How did you come up with your 40,000 list? I suppose some obvious categories could be listed and marked for regular checking. As the numbers increase though, the checking will take longer. Let me know how useful the list I made is, and then I'll see what I can do to help

4101:

44,324 articles were assessed, reducing the number of unassessed articles by an astounding 33% - from 135,345 to 91,021. In addition, many of the assessed articles further were linked to the appropriate work groups, significantly improving the chance that these articles will be improved. Without

2941:

is trying to figure out what he wants.) If he does want it restored, DRV is exactly where he'd get directed, if he just wants a personal copy, he can get that off any number of web mirrors. There's nothing personal intended about it, and I certainly hope you don't take it that way, just pointing a

2008:

The Beatles went on to have massive international success. Although its a lead such a bold claim needs a reference - Citations rarely go in the lead, and not for a statement as safe as that. Everybody knows The Beatles had extraordinarily massive success, including even those people who think they

628:

Regarding the formatting, the CSS file for WikiPedia uses the #toc rule to tie the formatting rules to the ToC, and so it's not surprising that the formatting gets broken when you change it. I am pretty handy with CSS, and can fix that part. I was unsure about how the show/hide stuff worked and to

3413:'s talk page. I was thinking of doing it but I didn't get around to it. I remember when a left about a year ago, my talk page was filled with messages about orphaned images, newsletters and whatnot and it was annoying. So, thanks and I hope you do that with my page, if I decide to leave again. :) 3159:

Just asked Kim as well, but you seem pretty reasonable. It appears the MfD is indeed going to result in shutdown-I'm not sure that's even necessarily a bad thing, a lot of the complaints are well-founded and serious. I was asking Kim, and would like to ask you as well-would you be willing to help

2976:

Hi, I just wanted to interject an apology for not letting you know sooner about this case as I was doing a lot of the talking with Jalabi99. Since anyone can raise an advocacy case to get some help or just someone to talk to, I didn't feel that I should contact you about the case until I had a go

2535:

Nope, that would necessitate checking the page history and it wouldn't be worth the resources. They get tagged, new or old. The only check I perform is that the article is still there - with a big run like Category:Living people it's not unusual to get to an article which has already been deleted

2985:

He may have just been put off a bit, thinking an admin was yelling at him. That's just my take on it. Thanks for giving him a copy of the list though. Hopefully that'll do it. Also, since this is all on topic, I wanted to get permission from you to copy these messages into the discussion section

1257:

Since you're here: I've just added the baronetcy parameter and - as a result of my discussion with them - a peerage parameter too. I ran extensive tests in my sandbox but obviously with a major change on a heavily used template I'm still a bit nervous, so if you'd care to run some tests too that

713:

Yes, remedy was simple, but lots of things are easy once you find out what to do! :-) I just had to discover that ".toc" was on the same CSS rules as "#toc", and then make sure that the show/hide stuff was not affected. The heading for the To Do list, which includes a title and "Edit or discuss

2689:

A long, long time ago (well, probably only a few months ago, but an eon in wiki-time), I asked someone about whether redirects could be found using AWB (similar to the "what transcludes here", but asking "what redirects here" instead - ie. filtering the what links here by "redirect" instead of

1199:

In the discussion when Crz nominated them for a mass-deletion, I think I satisfied your joint concern that they were all "identical". I also told everyone that I was working my way throghh them, further individualizing them from the transcripts from their Combatant Status Review Tribunals and

297:

Oh yes the logging switch between different runs of the program needs some work - it doesn't pick up the Logging name inserted after the "first run". i.e. the work round is to exit the program and re-start it. Awkward. Otherwise this is really going to speed things up - even make them more

4431:

Your recent(drastic) rv to The Beatles article was certainly warranted(minus the leftover vandalism that had to be removed). But the same user who keeps tanking the article with mass changes...without discussion....has continued to add/alter content which, by my best observation, slaps

629:

tell the truth I didn't even look. Generally speaking, that stuff is not hard to do. Do you want me to give this a go? I'd change the ID, copy the formatting from the WikiPedia CSS, and then figure out how to make the show/hide stuff works. Get back to me about that after you here from

3379:"Trolls just like to troll. Knowledge doesn't have an unfair elite either. In fact, it's ridiculously easy to become an admin and part of the "elite" here. Just follow the rules and guidelines, put some time and effort in, get to know the other admins, and you're in. Piece of cake." 2977:

ahead from Jalabi99. I hope it's clear that we're just trying to help out and give advice, and that we're try not to let it fall into the state of a complaint forum. I think he probably raised the advocacy case because he thought one of your comments was a little on the snarky side:

831:. Essentially I'm happy for someone else's bot to do it but it would obviously be more convenient for the wikiprojects (and me as I'm usually the one doing the requests) if we could have the bot. I would appreciate some dialogue as to why the application is unacceptable. thanks. -- 2011:

True, but such a bold claim need a reference even in the lead, i didn't find anything about saying their most successful period was with Brian in the body (direct me if I'm wrong) but information that is challenged or likely to be challenged must be sourced to confirm with

3774:

Hi, thanks for the message. I don't know if removing speedy deletion tags is allowed for non-admins, but I don't see any reason why not if you replace it with an AFD notice in good faith. As you say, if a CSD is borderline it's better to test consensus than just zap it.

2615:

No problems. As long as the tagging gets done, that's the main thing! Do you have a way of finding out how many untagged articles you tagged in those categories? Hundreds? Thousands? Will the Assessment Drive gains be wiped out (as they should be...)? <evil grin:

1007:

so I'd rather not include it - quite a few urban studies articles are about pretty abstract concepts so I'm not sure an infobox would ever be appropriate - I take it my option then is to not use the generic template and to set AWB to skip talk pages already with the

3480:), I was hoping for AT LEAST a "B" grade on the article, yet it was graded as a "Start." Could you please tell me why you believe it is a Start, and perhaps give me some ideas as to how to upgrade the article to the next level (B or above)? Thanks in advance! 924:

it still hits (and skips!) talk pages which don't have articles any more. Quite a lot of stuff gets deleted you know :) That said, I don't think I'll bother adding this. It was an old item on the todo list but since your idea didn't work I'll just remove it.

2131: 2250:

The easiest way is probably to use AWB. Load the contents of the category, and then select the subcategories, right click and select add to list from category. Repeat until you've hit the bottom of the "tree". Expect to get a mighty big list though!

1213:

Hi, nice to hear from you again. Only my bot read them, and it read the talk pages only :) However, since you ask I'll take a look, but it probably won't be today as I have a bit of a backlog of things to do as well as a bot to keep an eye on.

3060: 504:

So... I suggest that the ID be changed to avoid the conflict with the standard table of contents. I wasn't sure where the id was used, so I didn't change it myself. I am pretty handy with templates, but I decided to heed the warning...

549:

It seems that changing the div name breaks the formatting (not too surprisingly). I imagine we could get round that by adding some css style elements but I'm not sure. If we can't, then the other alternative is to ask whoever created

3236:

I have work queued up for WP Bio, and I don't have any code written to do this particular job. If there's consensus to do it, and if it's a useful change (neither of which I'm convinced of at this stage), perhaps you could ask at

2200:

I can indeed filter out those which are already tagged. A list clean of false positives (lists, other junk which isn't biographical) is all I need, preferably with category names so that I can put the category name into the edit

4199:

Thanks for the heads up on this - looks good. It also appears to have a different usage, being more focused on edits done in passing rather than the concerted batch of updates that AWB and your plugin are so good at. Thanks. ::

4010:

Oh dear Lord, you couldn't have told me that THREE years ago?? Never mind buddy, it's a pain but the end is in sight now - I'm on the home stretch. Only a month or so left and then I'm ditching it forever. Law students, fucking

347:

Tried on my last run it should have used the title "1950s novel stubs" instead it used the previous "19th century novel stubs". It might still be something I am doing wrong - but this bit of the tool isn't the most obvious. ::

1369:

OK, I'll change the logic later today. Also, you needn't worry about setting up the categories the template has defined, as they have to be set up a special way - I'll either do it manually or write a little program to do it.

606:

it via something like ]. That's not an exact quote, but I hope it makes the point. It can't skip to the ToC any other way; that's the ID of the ToC. The conflict is between the ToC code (created by, I presume, MediaWiki) and

2291:

Looking at it, the deaths by year categories seem quite well organised. If you want you can hold off on making a list; I'll take a closer look later and if I can do it without too much fuss I'll generate the list myself.

3393:

He was saying that admins get special favour, and also that there's an unfair elite here. I took that to mean admins (it's easy to become one, we're not a closed community). Perhaps he meant arbitrators. I don't know.

681:

creator to fix what they did. Aren't a lot of other templates going to be affected? everyone and their brother cribbed from our code over the past months. Our fix would need to be replicated a lot, no? Seems bad.

2903:

Can you reinstate it? Or is it more effective for me to post a new article (how can i be sure that won't just get deleted again?). This is the first article i've entered on wikipedia, i'm new to the process.. /

4149: 3700:. The user had provided all the necessary information that you requested for. But after that nobody including you didn't follow-up on this request. Hope that you will get some time to check this item in the 4436:

and previous discussion. If you have time could you return to that article for review. I've rv'd it already a couple of times this eve(simple V rv's) I will not shade 3RR just to keep it neat n tidy. Ahoy!

2179: 2889:

The subject is notable. I was about to expand this entry and add information regarding a lengthy entry on Tracey Moberly in the recently published 2-volume encyclopaedia "Artists in Britain since 1945"

2431:

I can't do it all man! :) Bio articles total at least quarter of a million, perhaps half a million! My plugin is available for others to use, so perhaps we could organise some methodical tagging? (See

2241:

to generate a list. I've always wanted to find out if the dead outnumber the living on Knowledge... :-) Is there an easy way to find out how many articles are in a category and all its subcategories?

797:

That's a mighty big file, if you're using something like a web browser or an old ftp client I'd try something more modern like Filezilla. Beyond that I'm not really sure what the problem is, sorry. --

1530:

probably need to be excluded or tagged by hand, so that category isn't suitable for a trawl (but some of the subcategories might be). Maybe best to continue giving me individual categories then. --

1063:

Ok, that's my 100 (approx. - there's some skipped) test edits done - I've had it working with both methods and other than the initial goof (above) it seems to be working ok - I'll report this at

3975:

My previous comment made it look like I was merely complaining. I did not intend that. I guess I have one question: Is there consensus to remove and enforce removal of obvious canvassing? --

2954:

If you were to give him a userfied copy, accompanied with a stern warning that using it to recreate the deleted list will be considered disruptive, I think that might solve the whole thing.

459: 4261:

I didn't reply to this straight away as I had to think about it... but alas I still don't get it. Help me out please! And thanks for the award, that'll sit very nicely on my user page :) --

3627:

Sorry, been busy (I'm now an AWB dev too!) but, yes, I'll do that for you if you think it's a good idea. Shouldn't lists be assessed like other articles? They can get featured after all. --

3059:

Don't worry about it. I can see you're acting in good faith. I should probably be apologising to you, since my post about it to the admins noticeboard has kicked off a bit of a storm! (see

1394: 2044:

I'm comparing the first part to that review, yes :) The Beatles were the most legendary musical group of all time, it's totally unquestionable and not a controversial claim in any way. --

3894:

My bot calls the function Tools.MakeHumanCatKey (or something like that) in AWB's WikiFunctions library, so it'll likely give the same results as AWB. I just finished a big run through

1683: 715:" tag is relative, so I changed that in favor of setting the size via CSS to "font-size: small;". If that is not acceptable, let me know and I'll change it. It might be too big now. — 4116:

I think in terms strictly of numbers I hindered rather than helped (due to tagging so many thousands of new articles), but I'll gladly accept anyway :) Much appreciated, thank you. --

3164:

started if you'd like to comment or edit away at it. (My pint has to come from here by the way, there's a place down the street that brews their own, best stuff in the world though.)

1720: 2740:

OK. That's cool. I've also requested the "expand all" feature and been told it is there! Thanks for all the advice today. I've got a lot to go away and think about. Happy AWBing!

3448:

within the Graham article itself. I've changed this back once with a notation in the edit summary to see the article, so I admit I'm confused why you changed it back. Thanks --

3704: 3659: 1572: 1406: 891:

to orphaned talk pages it finds. As it does WikiProject tagging false positives should be less. However, there's no point wasting my time. What do you think? Just forget it? --

743:

I think you withdrew that a bit hastily. We have a duty to cover all bases, but I'm sure provided the transclusion limits weren't hit it would ultimately have been approved. --

3425:

Yes, it's depressing to come back to a load of old messages isn't it. Hopefully the cleanup will discourage new messages and reduce the stress on her if she does come back. --

2854: 1662: 1646: 1609: 1064: 828: 4106:

and yourself, the assessment drive would not have achieved such significant results. For your enhancement of Knowledge through your technical work in the assessment drive,

2639:

reliable sources survive for future generations to use, will be incredibly well (maybe too well) documented. And the information overload will only get worse in the future.

2582:

Yes I did, and I didn't find it to be in a format which was very useful, sorry (not criticising, just saying how it is :)). I'm actually tagging dead people categories now (

950:, for my curiosity of the controversy. I promise I will not recreate the article or permenantly store it in userspace. You may also send it to me by email user. thank you! 3278:

Yes it should, but by getting the label I can attach to the TextChanged event, so that I can update the label which used to display the nudge count from my nudge timer. --

1699: 1400: 976: 3579:

The only movement in that edit was WPBio to the top, because of the living persons warning. That is the most important template on the page, by clear consensus. The

3344:

under that name and are about to change their name (probably to Barebacker, but not yet decided), and it will make more sense to have any article under the new name.

3842: 2626: 1558: 1522:? Are all the subcategories there suitable for tagging as peerage work group? (I'll need your guidance on this as I'm not an expert on what your projects cover.) -- 2594: 1676: 1625: 1588: 1429: 1423: 1258:

would be great. I'll also need some help getting those two projects to look like WPBio workgroups (a la British Royalty and WP Musicians) if you're interested. --

845: 2032:

Saying something is highly successful is POV unless backed by a source. and per above likely to be challenged it needs a source as it can be considered POV or OR

527:

and I think we copied the code from somewhere. I'll look into fixing it myself or see how other templates older than Skiptotoctalk have got round the problem. --

1713: 1669: 1655: 2914:

There wasn't any clear assertion of notability. Yes, you're free to post again and if you feel she is notable please do. Just make sure you assert notability (

2459: 1706: 1692: 3016:

The central issue remains - whether or not it was a good closure - but since nobody else has said it was bad - and the topic is at AN - I presume it was ok.

2807:

as a start class. I was hoping that you could add some suggestions at the talk page so that I could improve the article. Thanks in advance for your help.

1203:

I see you are adding those biography templates to them now. Having read through them again now, are there any unsatisfied concerns you care to raise? --

2822: 3547:

template to the bottom of the page - this is a request, so it should remain above the "statements" like wikiproject banners. Also, when there's just one

3160:

with a new proposal that might provide the good effects, while addressing and eliminating the problems raised like lawyering and bureaucracy? I've got a

3013:

yelling, because I had to go remove links which imho shouldn't have been there! :) Perhaps I should have been a little more delicate, but live and learn.

2432: 1329: 1109: 1054:

Beginners goof - I forgot to switch the list to 'talk' for 10 edits - i've reverted the damage, rapped my knuckles and move on a wiser man.....sorry. --

1164:

There's probably something about it in my talk archive 7 and on Ryanpostlethwaite's (sp) talk page/archive. Cheers for the help. Off to bed now, heh. –

810:

which worked! The download appears to have been successful ... and the file is unzipping now. Hope I'm not going to jinx it by saying this ... Thanks --

671:

If you all know what to do, I'd say do it. Div is not my strong point, but I thought toc was a style in our css already. I think the onus is on the new

2481:

There's no longer a catch-all category, no. The best way would be to use "what transcludes here" in AWB then filter out all namespaces except Talk:. --

2546:

I'll probably look at this tomorrow. Just finished tagging peerage/baronetcies, with living people still underway, and would like an evening off :) --

1639: 1602: 1565: 1551: 3993:

It's moot now the MFD has closed, but my take is that maneuvers like that would need consensus sought on a case by case basis, probably at WP:ANI. --

2942:

new user in the right direction. I'm certainly always glad to see someone ask for guidance rather than disruptively recreating articles or the like.

3757: 1632: 1618: 1595: 1581: 2887:

your summary suggests "not notable" or "article about a person, group, company, or website that does not assert the importance of the subject..."

975:

Thank you for sending me the copy of the deleted GNAA article. Wow that was long. lol. I will not put it on Knowledge I promise. It was deleted in

465:

Hopefully the AWB devs will add the feature into AWB soon, if they could be "nudged" in that direction it would be one less thing for me to fix! --

3122:

Looks like I picked a great time to get into the middle of this, hehe. But yeah, no worries all around. We should all just go and get a pint:-P. -

2590: 2400: 608: 487: 159:

Done. Sorry about that; I thought I'd done it but of course what I'd actually done was add you to the users list. You should be good to go now. --

2840:

Hey! Thanks for letting me know about the change t the template. I just charge ahead until somoneone whacks me upside the head! Happy trails!

3697: 2030:

and later controlled the Epstein family's music outlets, which became highly successful. POV statement - Not so much POV as needing a source. -

714:

these tasks" looked too small after the edit; no reason why they should have changed but there are a lot of wrapped DIVs and the "<small: -->

4377: 1287:. And it would be terrific if a bot could go through all the baronets and baronetcies adding the template. I have no idea how to use a bot. - 3916: 2710: 1346:

I set it up to be one or the other, since WP Baronets is a subproject of Peerage. Is he a peer or a baronet? Or is it possible to be both? --

180:

I thought it had to be in both, but evidently not. I'll run a test after lunch to see if it works - if it doesn't I'd consider that a bug. --

4248:, including four featured articles, I award you The Featured Article Medal (note the capitalisation of 'The' and count the letters :-) ). -- 2204:

No, I don't scan those categories routinely: with over 100,000 articles in Cat:Living people it's a job enough keeping on top of that! :) --

2145:

Thank you for your seriously useful hard work on peerage baronetage and other work groups. You and your bot are like the energiser bunny. -

960:

Gosh I didn't know that had gone. I don't suppose there's any harm in sending you a copy by email, but please don't post it on Knowledge. --

1483: 806:

Filezilla would probably have done it. I didn't get it to work on my first couple of tries and before I got further someone else suggested

120:

it still comes up as "Bot = False" which I assume is the key indicator that I am able to proceed in "Auto" mode. Hope this makes sense. ::

1912:. I simply use a function in AWB to add that parameter :) In this case, probably a simple addition of a comma in the code would fix it. -- 1045:- and that seemed ok too. I'll trial the first 50 edits with this method and then have a look at the 'generic template' method. cheers. -- 3019:

WRT to archiving my messages elsewhere, I'd prefer that you didn't, although technically I can't stop you if you comply with the GFDL! --

2690:"transclusion"). I think it must have been you I asked. Did that ever get implemented (I don't think I ever got round to requesting it)? 228: 3880: 3501: 2986:

since we're supposed to be keeping records. Thanks and sorry for any trouble or (hopefully only) minor headaches this may have caused. -

1983: 1909: 1103: 1042: 4327:

is it possible to remove wikiproject tagging using your plugin? If not, can you suggest me another method for doing it? Happy editing,

1807: 4372:}} from around 2150 pages. I've been asked to do so by the project, following a tagging against consensus done by my bot on behalf of 3762: 387: 2722:

Though I did find something under the notes for version 3.1.2.0 - "New option to add articles to list from redirects." - is that it?

368:

You could always turn logging off, or turn uploading off and upload them manually. I agree that part of the plugin is a bit flaky. --

231:

added the line "22 March 2007 14:11 Bot mode: Haven't heard from AWB in over 10 minutes, giving it a nudge" - does that help at all.

2713:, but only found an ignore option (though that could be inverted quite easily). Is this what you meant, or have I missed something? 2348: 1302:

I'm shattered, so I'll test that image and attend to it tommorow. Looks good at first glance. Do you have one for WP Peerage too? --

947: 1967:

Not imho, but your edits get hidden as a bot anyway so no real need to mark as minor unless the edit is truly trivial :) Thanks. --

3311: 1200:

Administrative Review Board hearings. I told everyone that I expected to have further individualized all of them by Christmas.

2017: 1477: 3747:. I also did it, but I had misgivings that it was not allowed until I noticed that you did it, and you're more experianced. 3255: 3910: 3879:

What does your bot do with names like O'Byrne, when adding living person template? This is in relation to AWB bug found here

2583: 2557: 2324: 2013: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2371: 441:

provided CTRL-F is finding everything for me :)). Thanks for the feedback and please let me know that the changes are OK. --

116:

I appear to have been approved - thanks - however when I fire up AWB with or without the plugin enabled, being logged in as

3561:, please leave it on top - when moved to the bottom, it can't be seen, but when at the top, both the WikiProject Biography 2302:

Aw. But I'm already up to 47 BC - I'll be stumbling across Caesar soon... :-) I'll keep going for a bit, and see how I do.

4384:). I hope it's clear now ;-) What I need is to totally remove the templates from the listed talk pages ;-) Happy editing, 1881: 1853: 100: 95: 90: 78: 73: 65: 2765:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AAutoWikiBrowser%2FCheckPage&diff=116307634&oldid=116220335

2650:

Absolutely. But OTOH, being able to select and filter information is going to be vital for this generation and beyond. --

3753: 1789: 1771: 3696:

I started this discussion with you here because you were involved in a discussion with the user who posted the case in

900:

How would your plugin encounter a non-existent page? Wouldn't the plugin only be directed to articles in a category? —

3608:

template and create such a category? Some unassessed articles are just lists and wouldn't qualify for classification.

3161: 1544: 1133: 276: 3257:

Why does your plugin need to get the string "Total nudges: "? Shouldn't it need the number of nudges, if anything? —

2586:), building the lists one century at a time. So far so good, the deaths by year categories seem quite well organised. 2361:

Lol, be a sport and remove them from that tree would you. They shouldn't be in the people categories, of course :) --

1837:

I would say royalty is embraced by peerage. But not all peers are royal. So I think the logic is absolutely right. -

2522: 1497: 1115: 611:. Any facility that references the "toc" ID will not work reliably; IDs in HTML are supposed to be unique per page. 425: 44: 2893: 4131: 3861: 3520: 2112: 2086: 1480: 1474: 1121: 1041:

I did a few test using the prepend method on the sandbox and it seemed ok - I just ran it through 10 articles in

691: 257: 2417:

Do you still look at the bio-stubs as well? I came across an article with a bio stub on it, but no WP-BIO tag.

240:

Oh OK, the plugin gave AWB a nudge because it thought it had frozen up. Perhaps that needs to be looked at. --

2890: 2625:

I could have made a note about the numbers as I did them, but of course I didn't :). However, my bot logs to

1097: 861:

Basically, yeah. It was producing too many false positives (i.e. archive pages, etc.) to be useful at all. —

4288:

It was a pointer to the fact that the letter-counting is of the medal's title and starts with "The". But it

3748: 3495: 3221: 3207: 3192: 3064: 2862: 2817:

My bot isn't clever enough to assess articles, but it would be cool if it was :) The assessment was done by

2238: 2187: 2183: 2150: 1926: 1898: 1862: 1842: 1828: 1760: 1732: 1492: 1438: 1360: 1337: 1319: 1292: 642:

I hear what you're saying. If you can fix it, please go right ahead. I'm quite busy at the moment anyway. --

3359: 3233:

I'm not sure what you're asking. Have they all switched to "priority" or do you unilaterally want them to?

885: 3934: 3895: 3238: 1526:

19:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Partially answering my own question, some of the articles and subcategories of

921: 675: 592: 554: 521: 4438: 4365: 4210: 4207: 4021: 3555: 3477: 3441: 2104: 358: 355: 337: 334: 308: 305: 208: 205: 130: 127: 1267:

When I find some free time, I'll give a hand. The RfA and my other commitments are keeping me busy. --

724:

Don't worry John, if it's broken or folks don't like the look we'll hear the complaints soon enough. --

3768: 3347: 2788:

Thanks mate, but you've already been added! :) Enjoy AWB and let me know if you have any questions. --

4369: 3976: 3966: 3922: 3322: 3305: 3301: 2818: 2396: 2261: 2108: 3841:

I don't know if there's a guideline page and I don't have time to write one, sorry. Thread moved to

4176: 4103: 3541: 3143: 3083: 1798: 1471: 1145:? also, I'd watch for more such trolls. This has happened before, also with Betacommand, at ANI. – 1068: 1055: 1046: 1022: 432: 283: 232: 117: 2264:. It is the expanding of the categories that is annoying. Is there an "expand all" option in AWB? 4409: 4293: 4249: 4186: 3962: 3904: 3794:

to the target page? Should be deleted as a cross namespace redir. Saves me 10 minutes. Cheers. --

3637: 3619: 3609: 3491: 3340: 3217: 3203: 3188: 3165: 3102: 2955: 2943: 2905: 2858: 2182:

about wanting to know about categories of dead people needing WP-BIO tagging. The obvious one is

2146: 1992: 1922: 1894: 1858: 1838: 1824: 1780: 1756: 1728: 1488: 1434: 1356: 1333: 1315: 1288: 836: 716: 634: 541: 508: 498: 480: 458:

I experienced that bug now as well. I'd done a run and finished, and was setting up the next one

53: 17: 3984:

I'll answer tommorow (it's curry night! :)) but "probably not" would be the answer for now... --

3791: 3006:

Thanks for the message. I understand your position, thank you for taking the time to clarify it.

2525:. Do you tend to allow time for articles to settle, and possibly be AfD'd, before tagging them? 753:

If the bot approval process is going to become as pedantic as RfA, I'm not interested. Thanks –

4050:

Thanks, I already figured out the reason why it's there, and probably will still stay there :)

4041:

Do you mean for deletion? I don't speak Spanish nor do I have admin rights there, I'm sorry. --

1285: 4525: 4506: 4476: 4381: 4271: 3825: 3570: 3267: 1908:

If you have any issues with the listas formatting or want to request a change, please post at

1015: 910: 871: 811: 788: 405: 4215: 2024:

please add WP:PDATA at the bottom of the article - Since when has that been needed for GA? -

1004:

Didn't take long - perhaps we can negotiate some kind of future 'good bot-husbandry' credits?

779:

Might you be able to point me in the right direction so I can successfully download the file

218:

It shouldn't do that unless you clicked Start. Can you elaborate on exactly what happened? --

4201: 3744: 3566: 3481: 1527: 1312: 1165: 1146: 349: 328: 299: 199: 121: 3701: 3656: 3444:

has been deceased for nearly 10 years. Please see the quote from his frequent collaborator

4012: 3319: 3187:

Please would you change importance to priority in WikiProject Business & Economics. -

3133: 3129: 3049: 3045: 2997: 2993: 2896: 2808: 2741: 2723: 2714: 2691: 2640: 2617: 2570: 2561: 2526: 2491: 2473: 2450: 2422: 2387: 2352: 2328: 2303: 2265: 2242: 2225: 2191: 2058: 2034: 1193: 415: 2855:

Knowledge:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Biography_(baronets)_articles_by_quality_statistics

1196:

exchanged a bunch of concerns over the articles on the Guantanamo captives last August.

4373: 3708: 3663: 3410: 2841: 2436: 1519: 171: 142: 3573: 784: 4524:

I have the most recent version of AWB, but I can't find any sort of plugins menu. --

4488: 4448: 4433: 4413: 4394: 4356: 4337: 4302: 4280: 4262: 4163: 4153: 4135: 4117: 4060: 4042: 3994: 3985: 3946: 3899: 3865: 3846: 3795: 3776: 3740: 3688: 3628: 3584: 3524: 3505: 3462: 3449: 3426: 3395: 3384: 3287: 3279: 3242: 3151: 3114: 3068: 3020: 2968: 2923: 2915: 2873: 2826: 2789: 2773: 2732: 2701: 2676: 2651: 2630: 2598: 2547: 2537: 2500: 2482: 2463: 2440: 2418: 2404: 2362: 2338: 2312: 2293: 2274: 2252: 2216: 2205: 2164: 2090: 2067: 2045: 1987: 1968: 1953: 1913: 1885: 1815: 1746: 1531: 1523: 1501: 1459: 1380: 1371: 1347: 1303: 1268: 1259: 1245: 1228: 1215: 1204: 1174: 1156: 1033: 990: 961: 926: 892: 852: 832: 798: 763: 754: 744: 725: 701: 687: 652: 643: 568: 528: 466: 442: 391: 369: 319: 264: 241: 219: 187: 181: 160: 151: 4528: 4511: 4491: 4481: 4451: 4441: 4416: 4402: 4359: 4345: 4305: 4296: 4283: 4274: 4265: 4252: 4189: 4166: 4156: 4138: 4120: 4063: 4054: 4045: 4035: 4015: 3997: 3988: 3979: 3969: 3965:

to this conversation, don't bother replying. Contact me via e-mail if you wish. --

3949: 3887: 3868: 3849: 3830: 3798: 3779: 3726: 3691: 3681: 3640: 3631: 3622: 3612: 3587: 3527: 3508: 3484: 3465: 3452: 3429: 3419: 3398: 3387: 3369: 3325: 3290: 3272: 3245: 3225: 3211: 3196: 3170: 3154: 3137: 3117: 3107: 3086: 3071: 3053: 3023: 3001: 2971: 2960: 2948: 2926: 2908: 2876: 2866: 2844: 2829: 2811: 2792: 2782: 2744: 2735: 2726: 2717: 2704: 2694: 2679: 2654: 2643: 2633: 2620: 2601: 2573: 2564: 2550: 2540: 2529: 2503: 2494: 2485: 2476: 2466: 2453: 2443: 2425: 2407: 2390: 2365: 2355: 2341: 2331: 2315: 2306: 2296: 2277: 2268: 2255: 2245: 2228: 2219: 2208: 2194: 2167: 2154: 2116: 2093: 2070: 2066:

Lol, right. You made a good new point at the talk page btw, I just replied there. --

2061: 2048: 2037: 1994: 1971: 1961: 1930: 1916: 1902: 1888: 1866: 1846: 1832: 1818: 1764: 1749: 1736: 1534: 1504: 1462: 1442: 1383: 1374: 1364: 1350: 1341: 1323: 1306: 1296: 1271: 1262: 1248: 1231: 1218: 1207: 1177: 1168: 1159: 1149: 1071: 1058: 1049: 1036: 1025: 993: 983: 964: 954: 929: 915: 895: 876: 855: 839: 814: 801: 791: 766: 757: 747: 728: 719: 704: 694: 655: 646: 637: 571: 544: 531: 511: 469: 445: 435: 394: 372: 363: 342: 322: 313: 286: 267: 244: 235: 222: 213: 190: 174: 170:

Steve, its still in the user list. I dont know if this would cause any problems....

163: 154: 145: 135: 4498: 4468: 4387: 4330: 4051: 4032: 3817: 3602: 3445: 3415: 3335:

Three months late, but I agree with your taking Misty Woods out of the infobox for

3259: 2919: 1946: 902: 863: 4082: 3583:

other movements my bot does is talkheader to top and skiptotoctalk to top. HTH. --

3113:

Indeed. This has obviously been simmering away under the surface for some time. --

2130: 2490:

Hmm. I'm going to have to take the plunge and get this AWB thingy, aren't I? :-)

2458:

I loaded the entire living people category, and then cross-referenced it against

2224:

Don't think the stub categories are there for this, but you could look yourself.

3884: 3845:, hopefully somewhere than can point you in the direction of some guidelines. -- 3065:

User_talk:Seraphimblade#.5B.5BWP:AMA.7CAssociation_of_members.27_advocates.5D.5D

2731:

Dunno, but the docs aren't always up to date. Trust me, the feature is there. --

198:

an auto run of the bot, but starting on it's own I wasn't signed up for LOL. ::

52:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3598:

Would you be able to add a facility for List class per the bio project for the

3318:", which is why I blocked. Keep the cabal alive! --May the Force be with you! 3150:

Farmers Glory would be preferable but alas I think they no longer brew it :( --

2899: 1458:

With pleasure, when my bot has finished it's current task I'll attend to it. --

979:. I can say it is one of the most controversial AFD ever occured in wikipedia. 462:. Will have to take another look at the code which turns the timer on and off. 4028: 3636:

I see your point, so I withdraw the request. Thanks for being of help though.

3124: 3101:

being subject to external control"). That's exactly why we talk about things.

3040: 2988: 980: 951: 4270:

Surely you can't miss the reference to the number 23! Congrats on the award!

3061:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates

2597:, your comments would be particularly welcome at the bot approval request. -- 2215:

Also, if stub categories are seperate I can apply class=Stub|auto=yes too. --

700:

I was thinking that. Nonetheless the remedy proved ridiculously simple! :) --

2804: 2779: 4279:

Aha! It was capitalisation of "The" which threw me. What does that mean? --

2004:

Are you comparing my review to the one that i got for the Slayer article?

3336: 3147: 807: 683: 630: 564: 3655:

I have re-initiated the case on my sockpupptry case in admin noticeboard

3490:

It wasn't me who assessed it. According to the talk page history it was

2591:

Wikipedia_talk:Categorization_of_people#Animals_in_the_people_categories

4245: 4229: 1893:

Preferably peers list-as title, forename, surname, 1st Baron of .... -

1088:

Hey. About to head to bed, but any chance of a block on that SPA troll

4110:

hereby awards you The da Vinci Barnstar. -- 17:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

2569:

PS. Click edit and use the original wikicode, as that is more list-y.

1091: 3662:. There is something odd in this sockpupptry decision. Pls check. -- 4102:

the assistance of the bots/scripts and rapid technical responses by

2901:. A TV programme is also due to be broadcast on BBC3 tomorrow night. 2821:. If you'd like to get some feedback on your article, please ask at 946:

Hello Kingboyk, I would like to ask you to recover the deleted page

4148:

You are mentioned in the lead of a Signpost article beginning with

1284:

That is great. Thank you. Please might we have an image; I suggest

651:

Ah, such a simple change and all working perfectly. Thanks John. --

141:

Yeah, you just need the bot account adding to the Bot list on AWB.

3618:

If you can't then that's ok, though I'd be grateful for any help.

2700:

Yeah, I requested that too, and yes the feature is now present. --

2521:

Of course, some articles have only been created recently, such as

1173:

I asked another admin for a second opinion, and he blocked him. --

4027:

Just noticed the close of the debate, however, Spanish Knowledge

2937:

Right now, I'm just trying to figure out what he wants. (I think

2439:

used to help out but alas Plange isn't active at the moment :( --

1984:

Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Approvals_group#Another_second_opinion_needed

4162:

I'm selling autographs for $ 20 a pop if you're interested :) --

560:

to fix it for us as our template came first and they broke it :)

4152:. Wow! And I knew you way back before you became notable! -- 3881:

Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Bugs#Defaultsort_and__O.27_names

390:, so it's likely it'll get more refined. Good news I think! -- 31: 3476:

After cleaning up and expanding a pretty sparse article (see

2883:

article on Tracey Moberly (Sanders-Wood) speedydeleted - why?

4378:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics#Tagging_math_articles

2892:

also a full page article on TM in the Independent newspaper

2186:. I assumed you already do regular scans of that one and of 1469:

Please would you embrace in peerage-work-group everybody in

4412:

if you need any help with the regex. Hope that helps! :) --

3843:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Biographies

787:

for a more complete explanation of how I am stuck. Thanks.

493:

The standard Table of Contents on Knowledge uses a DIV with

431:" which is the true template. Thanks for all your efforts. 4351:

Possibly, it depends what you want to do. Can you tell me

2026:

Not a GA requirement but biography articles should have it

253:

PS Edits are looking good. Seems like we won't be needing

4466:

solved everything, and there was no need for my bot :-) —

4185:

Oh right, I never knew that. Thanks for imforming me. --

2053:

Well you need to prove that their most successful period

1910:

Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Bugs#Tools.MakeHumanCatKey

1884:, mostly duplicates). Any more, or is that "job done"? -- 1395:

Category:Baronets_in_the_Baronetage_of_the_United_Kingdom

989:

Yes indeed. I'm glad it's gone - how did I miss that?! --

567:

will know how to fix it, so I'll pop over and ask him. --

318:

Did you click Apply to apply the new logging settings? --

2462:

to remove the articles which already have living=yes. --

1921:

Thank you very much indeed. That is extremely useful. -

1684:

Category:Marquesses in the Peerage of the United Kingdom

186:

My bot and yours are listed in both sections I think. --

4463: 4244:

For outstanding service to all esoteric musical things

3940: 3928: 3458: 2764: 2672: 2536:

since I made my list. In that case the bot skips it. --

2337:

I'll look at that later then. Bot is currently busy. --

1721:

Category:Viscounts in the Peerage of the United Kingdom

1254:

I thought I heard a beep! Bit too busy to check it now.

1139: 1127: 483:}} includes {{Knowledge:WikiProject The Beatles/To do}} 4447:

Sounds fair enough. I'll take a look later, cheers. --

3282:

01:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC) Oh, that and constants are

3710: 3665: 2589:

I've also made progress on the racehorses issue, see

2435:

for an out of date page but still a suitable venue.)

3705:

Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pens withdrawn

3660:

Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pens withdrawn

1573:

Category:Barons in the Peerage of the United Kingdom

1407:

Category:Baronets_in_the_Baronetage_of_Great_Britain

588:

Let's hear what he says. I don't think the issue is

4099:

WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive,

1982:

I've got an issue I'd love to hear some more on at:

1663:

Category:Marquesses in the Peerage of Great Britain

1647:

Category:Earls in the Peerage of the United Kingdom

1610:

Category:Dukes in the Peerage of the United Kingdom

1065:

Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/Antischmitzbot

829:

Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/Antischmitzbot

4108:WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive 1700:Category:Viscounts in the Peerage of Great Britain 1401:Category:Baronets_in_the_Baronetage_of_Nova_Scotia 1823:St Albans, St Clements etc are always under S. - 1808:Category:Lords Chief Justice of England and Wales 2178:Hi there. I'm following up the comment you made 26: 3945:) you may well be able to find an example... -- 2627:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography/Automation/Logs 2370:They've been tangled in at the year level. See 1559:Category:Barons in the Peerage of Great Britain 2872:Looks like you have some assessing to do :) -- 2595:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/MetsBot 8 1677:Category:Marquesses in the Peerage of Scotland 1626:Category:Earls in the Peerage of Great Britain 1589:Category:Dukes in the Peerage of Great Britain 1430:Category:Baronets_in_the_Baronetage_of_Ireland 1424:Category:Baronets_in_the_Baronetage_of_England 846:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/MetsBot 2 3898:, so if you have a look at the bot contribs ( 3537:When running your bot, please don't move the 2967:Okie dokie, will do. Thanks for your help. -- 2803:Hi! I see your bot has tagged my article on 1714:Category:Viscounts in the Peerage of Scotland 1670:Category:Marquesses in the Peerage of Ireland 1656:Category:Marquesses in the Peerage of England 8: 3717: 3714: 3672: 3669: 3569:for an example of when the bot did this). -- 3440:I'm sorry to say that the comic-book artist 2460:Category:Biography articles of living people 2273:No there isn't, but you could request it! -- 1707:Category:Viscounts in the Peerage of Ireland 1693:Category:Viscounts in the Peerage of England 1328:Not sure peerage-work-group is working. See 1311:I do understand. Maybe the peers would like 1227:OK, thanks. as your time permits then... 2823:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography/Peer review 2560:? No rush, but just a polite reminder. :-) 1244:Ding! I believe that "You've got mail!" -- 4301:Hehe! You rascal! Got it now :) Thanks! -- 3658:started by some of the victim of the case: 2433:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography/Automation 2260:That is similar to what I do already with 1540:These categories SHOULD embrace everybody. 1330:Talk:Charles McLaren, 1st Baron Aberconway 1188:Your concerns about the Guantaamo articles 227:Just as a clue I noticed the logging - in 150:Didn't I do that? Whoops. I'll sort it. -- 4080: 1640:Category:Earls in the Peerage of Scotland 1603:Category:Dukes in the Peerage of Scotland 1566:Category:Barons in the Peerage of Ireland 1552:Category:Barons in the Peerage of England 4126:Wrong listas parameter for Chinese names 3862:Template_talk:WPBiography#Succession_box 3687:I don't have checkuser access, sorry. -- 1633:Category:Earls in the Peerage of Ireland 1619:Category:Earls in the Peerage of England 1596:Category:Dukes in the Peerage of Ireland 1582:Category:Dukes in the Peerage of England 851:Whatever happened to that? Abandoned? -- 4427:Unwanted changes in The Beatles article 3565:the original banner can be seen. (See 2401:Knowledge talk:Categorization of people 2395:Post it as a request for assistance at 881:I was thinking of having my plugin add 609:Knowledge:WikiProject The Beatles/To do 488:Knowledge:WikiProject The Beatles/To do 4132:User_talk:Kingbotk/Plugin#WPBio_Listas 3202:and WikiProject History of Science. - 2384:Category:21st century racehorse deaths 2380:Category:20th century racehorse deaths 2376:Category:19th century racehorse deaths 2372:Category:18th century racehorse deaths 2128: 50:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4074:Thank you for your special assistance 3721: 3698:Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard 3676: 3314:) looked to me to be a play on "Simon 2711:Knowledge:AutoWikiBrowser/User_manual 2556:Did you ever get a chance to look at 2237:Well, I don't mind rummaging through 1392:Please would you cast your bot using 7: 4364::) I have to remove the templates {{ 4130:Thread moved to and please reply at 2103:You may be interested in my post at 1484:Category:Peers of the United Kingdom 920:Yes but when doing a large job like 421:exist as templates as "redirect to " 229:User:KevinalewisBot/Logs/220307 $ 1 4150:Following a comment by kingboyk ... 3345: 1043:Category:Urban studies and planning 4355:what it is you want to achieve? -- 4031:which might have to be looked at. 3353: 2347:Stupid animal death categories... 24: 3790:Could your bot redirect links to 3361: 3348: 2770:Here is my User page on Commons: 2673:Looks like it's already over 5000 2349:Category:Racehorse deaths by year 1986:if you have a moment. Thanks, — 948:Gay Nigger Association of America 4228: 4081: 3804: 2129: 1032:now as I'm knackered :) nite. -- 35: 3734: 3096:Of course not! If there really 2018:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 1478:Category:Peers of Great Britain 517:OK. Our template is older than 2584:Special:Contributions/Kingbotk 2558:User:Carcharoth/Deaths by year 2325:User:Carcharoth/Deaths by year 2105:User_talk:CMummert#Stats table 2014:Knowledge:No original research 1: 2523:Mark Shields (police-officer) 2323:OK. The 'BC' articles are at 1882:Category:Representative peers 1880:Just doing the last one now ( 1854:Category:Representative peers 1784:Should be encompassed already 1379:The above is all done now. -- 3703:, not the check user request 3459:That's an easy one to answer 3409:Hey, thanks for cleaning up 2895:, BBC news website articles 2174:Dead people - WP-BIO tagging 1790:Category:Lords of Parliament 1772:Category:Pre-1876 life peers 4144:Hey, you made the Signpost! 3735:I guess I'm in good company 2685:Finding redirects using AWB 2499:It would seem so, yes :) -- 1545:Category:British baronesses 1496:12:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 1155:Looking into it, thanks. -- 1011:string and then to prepend 388:nudge code will go into AWB 4550: 4238:The Featured Article Medal 3743:to comfirm consensus on a 3588:09:19, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 3574:04:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 3528:20:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3509:17:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3485:17:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3466:17:41, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3453:17:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3430:17:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3420:17:25, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3399:17:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3388:17:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3370:15:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3326:13:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3291:01:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3273:00:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3246:11:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3226:11:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3216:and WikiProject France. - 3212:22:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3197:22:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3171:04:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3155:19:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3138:18:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3118:17:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3108:17:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3087:15:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3072:17:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3054:17:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3024:17:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3002:16:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 2972:13:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 2961:13:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 2949:13:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 2927:11:41, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 2909:09:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 2877:11:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 2867:07:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 2845:02:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 2830:22:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2812:22:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2793:21:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2783:21:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2745:15:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2736:15:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2727:15:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2718:15:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2705:15:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2695:15:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2551:19:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 2541:14:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2530:14:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2504:15:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2495:15:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2486:15:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2477:15:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2467:15:10, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2454:14:54, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2444:14:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2426:14:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2408:14:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2391:14:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2366:13:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2356:13:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2342:13:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2332:13:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2316:12:35, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2307:12:31, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2297:12:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2278:12:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2269:12:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2256:12:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2246:12:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2229:13:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2220:12:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2209:12:10, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2195:12:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2168:11:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2155:09:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2117:04:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2094:20:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 2071:12:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 2062:12:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 2049:12:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 2038:12:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 1995:03:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 1972:14:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 1962:01:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 1931:20:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 1917:13:04, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 1903:12:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 1889:15:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 1867:21:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1847:21:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1833:07:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1819:21:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 1765:21:10, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 1750:21:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 1737:21:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 1535:19:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 1505:12:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 1498:Category:Peers of Scotland 1463:14:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 1443:14:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 1384:23:56, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 1375:14:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 1365:14:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 1351:14:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 1342:14:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 1324:23:35, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 1307:23:08, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 1297:23:05, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 1272:16:00, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 1263:21:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 1249:21:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 1232:13:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 1219:21:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 1208:21:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 1178:19:31, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 1169:18:00, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 1160:17:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 1150:17:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 1072:10:52, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 1059:02:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 1050:02:15, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 1037:02:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 1026:01:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 994:02:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 984:01:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 965:01:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 955:01:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 930:20:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 916:19:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 896:15:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 877:01:29, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 856:01:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 840:00:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 815:21:39, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 802:22:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 792:22:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 767:19:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 758:19:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 748:13:04, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 729:20:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 720:18:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 705:17:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 695:17:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 656:17:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 647:16:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 638:16:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 572:16:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 545:02:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 532:18:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 512:17:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 470:14:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 446:15:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 436:15:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 395:00:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 373:17:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 364:16:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 343:16:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 323:16:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 314:16:06, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 287:16:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 268:14:51, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 245:16:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 236:16:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 223:14:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 214:14:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 191:13:01, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 184:12:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 175:12:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 164:12:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 155:11:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 146:11:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 136:08:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 29: 4529:16:51, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 4512:19:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 4492:10:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 4482:03:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 4452:10:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 4442:02:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 4417:14:26, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 4403:14:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 4360:14:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 4346:14:08, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 4306:18:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 4297:18:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 4284:17:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 4275:16:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 4266:14:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 4253:17:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 4234: 4227: 4216:13:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 4190:12:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 4167:11:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 4157:06:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 4139:10:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 4121:20:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 4087: 4064:10:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 4055:03:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 4046:14:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 4036:14:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 4016:22:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 3998:12:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 3989:21:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 3980:18:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 3970:17:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 3950:15:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 3888:15:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 3869:14:34, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 3850:12:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 3831:21:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 3799:21:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 3780:20:47, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 3769:09:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 3727:08:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 3692:20:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 3682:06:47, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 3641:02:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 3632:12:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 3623:16:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 3613:01:20, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 3521:User talk:Kingbotk/Plugin 2709:Ah. I was just searching 2680:17:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 2655:15:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 2644:14:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 2634:14:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 2621:14:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 2602:14:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 2574:14:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 2565:14:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 2135: 2087:User talk:Kingbotk/Plugin 2081:Kingbotk "listas" tagging 1943:Ok, I thought it was ;-) 1481:Category:Peers of Ireland 1475:Category:Peers of England 497:The id conflict breaks {{ 3713: 3668: 3551:WikiProject banner like 401:we have discovered that 4487:Oic... heh... sorry! -- 4059:Lol, yeah, me too :) -- 3383:it to me? Sincerely, -- 2918:) and provide sources ( 2239:Category:Deaths by year 2188:Category:Births by year 2184:Category:Deaths by year 4376:and a discussion (see 4194: 3896:Category:Living people 3239:Knowledge:Bot requests 2922:). Hope that helps. -- 1755:Yes. All are peers. - 922:Category:Living people 781:pages_articles.xml.bz2 563:I suspect though that 490:}} includes a DIV with 327:Ok, I'll try that. :: 4462:Unless I'm mistaken, 4091:The da Vinci Barnstar 4029:has a similar article 3478:Talk:Kurtis Mantronik 3442:Billy Graham (comics) 1741:OK, and they are all 263:for much longer :) -- 48:of past discussions. 3078:Re: Database warning 3063:, and my message at 2819:User:Doctor Sunshine 2311:Hehe, no worries. -- 2262:Special:CategoryTree 2163:Thanks very much! -- 2139:The Society Barnstar 739:Re: Your bot request 540:OK, good. Thanks. — 3739:I noticed you used 3297:Re: Username blocks 1799:Category:Life peers 1472:Category:Life peers 1280:Baronets work group 977:the 18th nomination 118:User:KevinalewisBot 4022:Kingdom of Vestria 3749:BuickCenturyDriver 3331:The Grid & GDM 1781:Category:Law lords 775:AWB learning curve 762:You're welcome. -- 499:Template:skiptotoc 481:Template:WPBeatles 386:It looks like the 277:Novelinfoboxincomp 258:Novelinfoboxneeded 18:User talk:Kingboyk 4536: 4535: 4502: 4472: 4398: 4341: 4258: 4257: 4221:And as for you... 4195:Outriggr's script 4114: 4113: 3821: 3767: 3366: 3263: 3224: 3210: 3195: 3169: 3106: 2959: 2947: 2865: 2774:commons:User:ALE! 2160: 2159: 2153: 1957: 1929: 1901: 1865: 1845: 1831: 1763: 1735: 1495: 1441: 1363: 1340: 1322: 1295: 906: 867: 426:NovelsWikiProject 282:for that matter. 106: 105: 60: 59: 54:current talk page 4541: 4510: 4500: 4496:No problem :-) — 4480: 4470: 4392: 4390: 4335: 4333: 4232: 4225: 4224: 4204: 4181: 4175: 4085: 4078: 4077: 3944: 3917:deleted contribs 3829: 3819: 3811: 3808: 3807: 3765: 3751: 3723: 3720: 3719: 3716: 3712: 3678: 3675: 3674: 3671: 3667: 3607: 3601: 3567:Talk:Ralph Watts 3560: 3554: 3546: 3540: 3472:Kurtis Mantronik 3418: 3368: 3365: 3360: 3357: 3352: 3271: 3261: 3220: 3206: 3191: 3168: 3105: 3082:OH NOES!!!1 ;-) 2958: 2946: 2861: 2850:Hors de combat ? 2604:(edit conflict!) 2149: 2133: 2126: 2125: 1990: 1951: 1949: 1925: 1897: 1861: 1841: 1827: 1759: 1731: 1528:Category:Peerage 1491: 1437: 1359: 1336: 1318: 1291: 1144: 1143: 1110:deleted contribs 1094: 1020: 1014: 914: 904: 890: 884: 875: 865: 827:I've replied at 680: 674: 597: 591: 559: 553: 526: 520: 460:when AWB started 430: 424: 420: 414: 410: 404: 352: 331: 302: 281: 275: 262: 256: 202: 124: 87: 62: 61: 39: 38: 32: 27: 4549: 4548: 4544: 4543: 4542: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4537: 4532: 4522: 4497: 4467: 4460: 4458:No need for bot 4429: 4397: 4388: 4340: 4331: 4322: 4320:Your AWB plugin 4223: 4213: 4202: 4197: 4183: 4179: 4173: 4146: 4128: 4076: 4025: 4008: 3958: 3902: 3877: 3857: 3839: 3816: 3809: 3805: 3788: 3761: 3745:speedy deletion 3737: 3653: 3605: 3599: 3596: 3558: 3552: 3544: 3538: 3535: 3532: 3517: 3474: 3438: 3414: 3407: 3377: 3333: 3299: 3258: 3253: 3185: 3162:userspace draft 3094: 3080: 2935: 2885: 2852: 2838: 2801: 2763:In response to 2761: 2759:AutoWikiBrowser 2687: 2176: 2124: 2109:Oleg Alexandrov 2101: 2083: 2002: 1988: 1980: 1956: 1947: 1941: 1282: 1242: 1194:User:Crzrussian 1190: 1095: 1090: 1089: 1086: 1018: 1012: 1002: 973: 944: 901: 888: 882: 862: 849: 825: 777: 741: 678: 672: 595: 589: 557: 551: 524: 518: 476: 456: 428: 422: 418: 412: 408: 402: 361: 350: 340: 329: 311: 300: 279: 273: 260: 254: 211: 200: 133: 122: 114: 83: 36: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4547: 4545: 4534: 4533: 4521: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4459: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4439:156.34.230.161 4428: 4425: 4424: 4423: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4408:Please ask at 4393: 4336: 4321: 4318: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4311: 4310: 4309: 4308: 4292:oblique. :) -- 4256: 4255: 4241: 4240: 4235: 4233: 4222: 4219: 4211: 4196: 4193: 4182: 4171: 4170: 4169: 4145: 4142: 4127: 4124: 4112: 4111: 4094: 4093: 4088: 4086: 4075: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4024: 4019: 4011:timewasters.-- 4007: 4004: 4003: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3991: 3957: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3876: 3873: 3856: 3855:Succession box 3853: 3838: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3787: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3736: 3733: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3652: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3595: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3534: 3531: 3516: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3473: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3437: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3411:User:Phaedriel 3406: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3376: 3373: 3332: 3329: 3298: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3252: 3249: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3218:Kittybrewster 3204:Kittybrewster 3189:Kittybrewster 3184: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3093: 3090: 3084:Kirill Lokshin 3079: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3017: 3014: 3007: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2934: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2902: 2888: 2884: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2859:Kittybrewster 2851: 2848: 2837: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2800: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2760: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2686: 2683: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2587: 2577: 2576: 2567: 2544: 2543: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2437:User:PlangeBot 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2345: 2344: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2202: 2175: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2158: 2157: 2147:Kittybrewster 2142: 2141: 2136: 2134: 2123: 2120: 2100: 2097: 2082: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2055:was with Brian 2041: 2040: 2028: 2022: 2001: 1998: 1979: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1952: 1940: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1923:Kittybrewster 1895:Kittybrewster 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1859:Kittybrewster 1839:Kittybrewster 1825:Kittybrewster 1757:Kittybrewster 1729:Kittybrewster 1725: 1724: 1717: 1710: 1703: 1696: 1688: 1687: 1680: 1673: 1666: 1659: 1651: 1650: 1643: 1636: 1629: 1622: 1614: 1613: 1606: 1599: 1592: 1585: 1577: 1576: 1569: 1562: 1555: 1548: 1541: 1520:Category:Peers 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1489:Kittybrewster 1467: 1466: 1465: 1435:Kittybrewster 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1357:Kittybrewster 1355:He is both. - 1334:Kittybrewster 1316:Kittybrewster 1289:Kittybrewster 1281: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1255: 1241: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1222: 1221: 1189: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1085: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1069:Antischmitzbot 1056:Antischmitzbot 1047:Antischmitzbot 1023:Antischmitzbot 1005: 1001: 998: 997: 996: 972: 969: 968: 967: 943: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 848: 843: 824: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 776: 773: 772: 771: 770: 769: 740: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 708: 707: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 561: 535: 534: 495: 494: 491: 484: 475: 473: 455: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 433:KevinalewisBot 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 359: 338: 309: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 284:KevinalewisBot 251: 250: 249: 248: 247: 233:KevinalewisBot 209: 195: 194: 193: 168: 167: 166: 157: 131: 113: 112:KevinalewisBot 110: 108: 104: 103: 98: 93: 88: 81: 76: 71: 68: 58: 57: 40: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4546: 4531: 4530: 4527: 4519: 4513: 4508: 4504: 4495: 4494: 4493: 4490: 4486: 4485: 4484: 4483: 4478: 4474: 4465: 4457: 4453: 4450: 4446: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4440: 4435: 4426: 4418: 4415: 4411: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4401: 4399: 4396: 4391: 4383: 4379: 4375: 4371: 4367: 4363: 4362: 4361: 4358: 4354: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4344: 4342: 4339: 4334: 4325: 4324:Hi Kingboyk, 4319: 4307: 4304: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4295: 4291: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4282: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4273: 4269: 4268: 4267: 4264: 4260: 4259: 4254: 4251: 4247: 4243: 4242: 4239: 4236: 4231: 4226: 4220: 4218: 4217: 4214: 4208: 4205: 4192: 4191: 4188: 4187:Mattythewhite 4178: 4172: 4168: 4165: 4161: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4155: 4151: 4143: 4141: 4140: 4137: 4133: 4125: 4123: 4122: 4119: 4109: 4105: 4100: 4096: 4095: 4092: 4089: 4084: 4079: 4073: 4065: 4062: 4058: 4057: 4056: 4053: 4049: 4048: 4047: 4044: 4040: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4034: 4030: 4023: 4020: 4018: 4017: 4014: 4005: 3999: 3996: 3992: 3990: 3987: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3978: 3974: 3973: 3972: 3971: 3968: 3964: 3955: 3951: 3948: 3942: 3939: 3936: 3933: 3930: 3927: 3924: 3921: 3918: 3915: 3912: 3909: 3906: 3901: 3897: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3889: 3886: 3882: 3874: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3867: 3863: 3854: 3852: 3851: 3848: 3844: 3836: 3832: 3827: 3823: 3814: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3797: 3793: 3785: 3781: 3778: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3764: 3759: 3755: 3750: 3746: 3742: 3728: 3725: 3724: 3706: 3702: 3699: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3690: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3680: 3679: 3661: 3657: 3650: 3642: 3639: 3638:LuciferMorgan 3635: 3634: 3633: 3630: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3621: 3620:LuciferMorgan 3617: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3611: 3610:LuciferMorgan 3604: 3593: 3589: 3586: 3582: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3572: 3568: 3564: 3557: 3550: 3543: 3530: 3529: 3526: 3522: 3514: 3510: 3507: 3503: 3500: 3497: 3493: 3492:NPswimdude500 3489: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3483: 3479: 3471: 3467: 3464: 3461::) Cheers. -- 3460: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3451: 3447: 3443: 3435: 3431: 3428: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3417: 3412: 3404: 3400: 3397: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3386: 3380: 3374: 3372: 3371: 3367: 3364: 3363:(talk to me!) 3358: 3356: 3351: 3342: 3339:. I've given 3338: 3330: 3328: 3327: 3324: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3310: 3307: 3303: 3296: 3292: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3269: 3265: 3256: 3250: 3248: 3247: 3244: 3240: 3234: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3183:Bot request 2 3182: 3172: 3167: 3166:Seraphimblade 3163: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3126: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3116: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3104: 3103:Seraphimblade 3099: 3091: 3089: 3088: 3085: 3077: 3073: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3042: 3025: 3022: 3018: 3015: 3012: 3008: 3005: 3004: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2990: 2984: 2979: 2978: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2970: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2957: 2956:Seraphimblade 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2945: 2944:Seraphimblade 2940: 2932: 2928: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2907: 2900: 2897: 2894: 2891: 2882: 2878: 2875: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2849: 2847: 2846: 2843: 2835: 2831: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2810: 2806: 2798: 2794: 2791: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2781: 2776: 2775: 2771: 2768: 2766: 2758: 2746: 2743: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2734: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2725: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2703: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2693: 2684: 2682: 2681: 2678: 2674: 2656: 2653: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2642: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2619: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2603: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2585: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2575: 2572: 2568: 2566: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2549: 2542: 2539: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2528: 2524: 2505: 2502: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2493: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2484: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2475: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2452: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2424: 2420: 2419:Alice Perrers 2409: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2364: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2354: 2350: 2343: 2340: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2330: 2326: 2317: 2314: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2305: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2295: 2279: 2276: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2254: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2230: 2227: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2218: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2173: 2169: 2166: 2162: 2161: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2143: 2140: 2137: 2132: 2127: 2121: 2119: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2098: 2096: 2095: 2092: 2088: 2080: 2072: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2047: 2043: 2042: 2039: 2036: 2033: 2029: 2027: 2023: 2021: 2019: 2015: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2000:OTT GA review 1999: 1997: 1996: 1993: 1991: 1985: 1977: 1973: 1970: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1960: 1958: 1955: 1950: 1938: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1891: 1890: 1887: 1883: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1855: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1817: 1813: 1810: 1809: 1804: 1801: 1800: 1795: 1792: 1791: 1786: 1785: 1782: 1777: 1774: 1773: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1748: 1745:, correct? -- 1744: 1739: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1723: 1722: 1718: 1716: 1715: 1711: 1709: 1708: 1704: 1702: 1701: 1697: 1695: 1694: 1690: 1689: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1665: 1664: 1660: 1658: 1657: 1653: 1652: 1649: 1648: 1644: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1635: 1634: 1630: 1628: 1627: 1623: 1621: 1620: 1616: 1615: 1612: 1611: 1607: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1598: 1597: 1593: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1584: 1583: 1579: 1578: 1575: 1574: 1570: 1568: 1567: 1563: 1561: 1560: 1556: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1547: 1546: 1542: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1506: 1503: 1499: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1485: 1482: 1479: 1476: 1473: 1468: 1464: 1461: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1431: 1426: 1425: 1409: 1408: 1403: 1402: 1397: 1396: 1391: 1385: 1382: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1373: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1349: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1305: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1279: 1273: 1270: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1256: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1247: 1239: 1233: 1230: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1220: 1217: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1201: 1197: 1195: 1187: 1179: 1176: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1167: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1158: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1148: 1141: 1138: 1135: 1132: 1129: 1126: 1123: 1120: 1117: 1116:nuke contribs 1114: 1111: 1108: 1105: 1102: 1099: 1093: 1092:HarryHasAnEgo 1083: 1073: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1057: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1035: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1024: 1017: 1010: 999: 995: 992: 988: 987: 986: 985: 982: 978: 970: 966: 963: 959: 958: 957: 956: 953: 949: 941: 931: 928: 923: 919: 918: 917: 912: 908: 899: 898: 897: 894: 887: 880: 879: 878: 873: 869: 860: 859: 858: 857: 854: 847: 844: 842: 841: 838: 834: 830: 822: 816: 813: 809: 805: 804: 803: 800: 796: 795: 794: 793: 790: 786: 783:? Please see 782: 774: 768: 765: 761: 760: 759: 756: 752: 751: 750: 749: 746: 738: 730: 727: 723: 722: 721: 718: 717:John Cardinal 712: 711: 710: 709: 706: 703: 699: 698: 697: 696: 693: 689: 685: 677: 676:Skiptotoctalk 657: 654: 650: 649: 648: 645: 641: 640: 639: 636: 635:John Cardinal 632: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 610: 605: 601: 598:. It doesn't 594: 593:skiptotoctalk 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 573: 570: 566: 562: 556: 555:Skiptotoctalk 548: 547: 546: 543: 542:John Cardinal 539: 538: 537: 536: 533: 530: 523: 522:Skiptotoctalk 516: 515: 514: 513: 510: 509:John Cardinal 506: 502: 500: 492: 489: 485: 482: 478: 477: 474: 472: 471: 468: 463: 461: 453: 447: 444: 439: 438: 437: 434: 427: 417: 407: 399: 398: 397: 396: 393: 389: 374: 371: 367: 366: 365: 362: 356: 353: 346: 345: 344: 341: 335: 332: 326: 325: 324: 321: 317: 316: 315: 312: 306: 303: 298:reliable. :: 296: 295: 288: 285: 278: 271: 270: 269: 266: 259: 252: 246: 243: 239: 238: 237: 234: 230: 226: 225: 224: 221: 217: 216: 215: 212: 206: 203: 196: 192: 189: 185: 183: 178: 177: 176: 173: 169: 165: 162: 158: 156: 153: 149: 148: 147: 144: 140: 139: 138: 137: 134: 128: 125: 119: 111: 109: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 86: 82: 80: 77: 75: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 55: 51: 47: 46: 41: 34: 33: 28: 19: 4523: 4461: 4430: 4386: 4385: 4382:my talk page 4366:Maths rating 4352: 4329: 4328: 4326: 4323: 4289: 4272:Martin Hinks 4237: 4198: 4184: 4147: 4129: 4115: 4107: 4098: 4097:Through the 4090: 4026: 4009: 3959: 3937: 3931: 3925: 3919: 3913: 3907: 3878: 3875:Bot question 3859: 3858: 3840: 3812: 3789: 3738: 3709: 3664: 3654: 3597: 3580: 3571:Tim4christ17 3562: 3556:Project Iowa 3548: 3536: 3533:Please don't 3518: 3498: 3475: 3446:Don McGregor 3439: 3436:Billy Graham 3408: 3381: 3378: 3362: 3354: 3349: 3334: 3315: 3308: 3300: 3283: 3254: 3235: 3232: 3186: 3144:London Pride 3123: 3097: 3095: 3081: 3039: 3036: 3010: 2987: 2938: 2936: 2886: 2853: 2839: 2802: 2777: 2772: 2769: 2762: 2688: 2671: 2545: 2520: 2449:after that. 2416: 2346: 2322: 2290: 2177: 2138: 2102: 2084: 2054: 2031: 2025: 2010: 2009:are crap. - 2003: 1981: 1945: 1944: 1942: 1892: 1879: 1852: 1811: 1806: 1802: 1797: 1793: 1788: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1770: 1742: 1740: 1726: 1719: 1712: 1705: 1698: 1691: 1682: 1675: 1668: 1661: 1654: 1645: 1638: 1631: 1624: 1617: 1608: 1601: 1594: 1587: 1580: 1571: 1564: 1557: 1550: 1543: 1517: 1470: 1428: 1422: 1421: 1405: 1399: 1393: 1283: 1243: 1202: 1198: 1191: 1136: 1130: 1124: 1118: 1112: 1106: 1100: 1087: 1008: 1003: 974: 945: 942:Recover page 886:Db-botnomain 850: 826: 812:Keesiewonder 789:Keesiewonder 780: 778: 742: 670: 603: 599: 507: 503: 496: 464: 457: 385: 179: 115: 107: 84: 49: 43: 4370:Math rating 4203:Kevinalewis 4006:Squinty Joe 3837:Biographies 3515:DEFAULTSORT 3482:Sundevilesq 3341:Misty Woods 3092:No troubles 2099:Stats table 1769:What about 1518:What about 823:Bot request 351:Kevinalewis 330:Kevinalewis 301:Kevinalewis 201:Kevinalewis 123:Kevinalewis 42:This is an 4177:Talkheader 4013:Crestville 3977:Iamunknown 3967:Iamunknown 3956:Canvassing 3935:block user 3929:filter log 3792:Persondata 3786:Persondata 3594:Assistance 3542:reqphotoin 3302:Simontinks 2809:Konczewski 2778:Cheers! -- 2742:Carcharoth 2724:Carcharoth 2715:Carcharoth 2692:Carcharoth 2641:Carcharoth 2618:Carcharoth 2571:Carcharoth 2562:Carcharoth 2527:Carcharoth 2492:Carcharoth 2474:Carcharoth 2451:Carcharoth 2423:Carcharoth 2388:Carcharoth 2353:Carcharoth 2329:Carcharoth 2304:Carcharoth 2266:Carcharoth 2243:Carcharoth 2226:Carcharoth 2192:Carcharoth 2059:M3tal H3ad 2035:M3tal H3ad 1857:please. - 1134:block user 1128:filter log 1009:{{planning 604:references 602:"toc", it 101:Archive 20 96:Archive 19 91:Archive 18 85:Archive 17 79:Archive 16 74:Archive 15 66:Archive 10 4434:concensus 4374:Parker007 4368:}} and {{ 3941:block log 3860:Moved to 3651:pls check 3519:Moved to 3405:Phaedriel 3148:Wadworths 3142:Mine's a 2842:Schmiteye 2805:Reiko Ike 2799:Reiko Ike 2085:Moved to 1140:block log 971:GNAA page 172:Reedy Boy 143:Reedy Boy 4526:Scorpion 4489:kingboyk 4449:kingboyk 4414:kingboyk 4357:kingboyk 4303:kingboyk 4281:kingboyk 4263:kingboyk 4164:kingboyk 4154:Jreferee 4136:kingboyk 4118:kingboyk 4104:Outriggr 4061:kingboyk 4043:kingboyk 3995:kingboyk 3986:kingboyk 3947:kingboyk 3911:contribs 3900:Kingbotk 3866:kingboyk 3847:kingboyk 3796:kingboyk 3777:kingboyk 3763:odometer 3758:contribs 3689:kingboyk 3629:kingboyk 3585:kingboyk 3525:kingboyk 3506:kingboyk 3502:contribs 3463:kingboyk 3450:Tenebrae 3427:kingboyk 3396:kingboyk 3385:Mattisse 3375:Question 3337:The Grid 3312:contribs 3288:kingboyk 3280:kingboyk 3243:kingboyk 3152:kingboyk 3134:AMA Desk 3115:kingboyk 3069:kingboyk 3050:AMA Desk 3021:kingboyk 2998:AMA Desk 2969:kingboyk 2933:Jalabi99 2924:kingboyk 2874:kingboyk 2827:kingboyk 2790:kingboyk 2733:kingboyk 2702:kingboyk 2677:kingboyk 2652:kingboyk 2631:kingboyk 2599:kingboyk 2548:kingboyk 2538:kingboyk 2501:kingboyk 2483:kingboyk 2464:kingboyk 2441:kingboyk 2405:kingboyk 2399:? Or at 2397:WT:WPBIO 2363:kingboyk 2339:kingboyk 2313:kingboyk 2294:kingboyk 2275:kingboyk 2253:kingboyk 2217:kingboyk 2206:kingboyk 2201:summary. 2165:kingboyk 2122:Barnstar 2091:kingboyk 2068:kingboyk 2046:kingboyk 1989:xaosflux 1978:BAG help 1969:kingboyk 1914:kingboyk 1886:kingboyk 1816:kingboyk 1747:kingboyk 1532:kingboyk 1524:kingboyk 1502:kingboyk 1460:kingboyk 1381:kingboyk 1372:kingboyk 1348:kingboyk 1304:kingboyk 1269:Jreferee 1260:kingboyk 1246:Jreferee 1229:Geo Swan 1216:kingboyk 1205:Geo Swan 1192:You and 1175:kingboyk 1157:kingboyk 1104:contribs 1034:kingboyk 1016:planning 991:kingboyk 962:kingboyk 927:kingboyk 893:kingboyk 853:kingboyk 833:Mcginnly 808:flashget 799:kingboyk 764:kingboyk 745:kingboyk 726:kingboyk 702:kingboyk 653:kingboyk 644:kingboyk 631:User:Lar 569:kingboyk 565:User:Lar 529:kingboyk 467:kingboyk 443:kingboyk 406:WPNovels 392:kingboyk 370:kingboyk 320:kingboyk 265:kingboyk 242:kingboyk 220:kingboyk 188:kingboyk 182:kingboyk 161:kingboyk 152:kingboyk 4389:Snowolf 4353:exactly 4332:Snowolf 4052:JRHorse 4033:JRHorse 3416:Mahanga 2351:. Grr! 1948:Snowolf 1939:Snowbot 45:archive 4410:WT:AWB 4294:Vinoir 4250:Vinoir 4212:(Desk) 3963:flames 3885:Gnevin 3350:Irides 3323:shth91 3316:stinks 3222:(talk) 3208:(talk) 3193:(talk) 2916:WP:BIO 2906:Redart 2863:(talk) 2472:that? 2382:, and 2151:(talk) 1927:(talk) 1899:(talk) 1863:(talk) 1843:(talk) 1829:(talk) 1805:, and 1761:(talk) 1733:(talk) 1493:(talk) 1439:(talk) 1361:(talk) 1338:(talk) 1320:(talk) 1293:(talk) 1166:Chacor 1147:Chacor 837:Natter 600:define 416:Novels 360:(Desk) 339:(Desk) 310:(Desk) 210:(Desk) 132:(Desk) 3549:short 3504:). -- 3355:centi 3286::) -- 3125:Cquan 3041:Cquan 2989:Cquan 2920:WP:RS 2836:{WPB} 1743:peers 1427:and 981:Wooyi 952:Wooyi 454:Nudge 16:< 4507:talk 4477:talk 4464:this 4380:and 4134:. -- 3923:logs 3905:talk 3864:. -- 3826:talk 3813:Done 3754:Honk 3581:only 3523:. -- 3496:talk 3320:Shre 3306:talk 3284:good 3268:talk 3251:r842 3241:? -- 3146:. A 3130:talk 3067:) -- 3046:talk 2994:talk 2898:etc 2825:. -- 2780:ALE! 2593:and 2403:? -- 2180:here 2113:talk 2089:. -- 2016:and 1851:and 1814:? -- 1500:. -- 1433:. - 1404:and 1398:and 1240:Mail 1122:logs 1098:talk 1067:. -- 1021:? -- 1000:$ 20 911:talk 872:talk 785:here 633:. — 411:and 4520:AWB 4503:501 4501:ETS 4473:501 4471:ETS 4395:CON 4338:CON 4290:was 3822:501 3820:ETS 3741:AFD 3718:ram 3711:Sun 3673:ram 3666:Sun 3603:HMM 3563:and 3346:- 3264:501 3262:ETS 3011:was 2616:--> 1954:CON 1803:Yes 1794:Yes 1776:Yes 1410:and 1084:Hey 907:501 905:ETS 868:501 866:ETS 755:Qxz 684:Lar 272:or 4400:- 4343:- 4206:: 4180:}} 4174:{{ 3890:) 3775:-- 3760:, 3756:, 3715:da 3707:. 3670:da 3606:}} 3600:{{ 3559:}} 3553:{{ 3545:}} 3539:{{ 3394:-- 3136:) 3132:, 3098:is 3052:) 3048:, 3009:I 3000:) 2996:, 2939:he 2857:- 2767:: 2421:. 2378:, 2374:, 2292:-- 2251:-- 2115:) 2107:. 1959:- 1812:No 1796:, 1787:, 1778:, 1727:- 1487:- 1370:-- 1332:- 1314:- 1214:-- 1019:}} 1013:{{ 925:-- 889:}} 883:{{ 835:| 686:: 682:++ 679:}} 673:{{ 596:}} 590:{{ 558:}} 552:{{ 525:}} 519:{{ 486:{{ 479:{{ 429:}} 423:{{ 419:}} 413:{{ 409:}} 403:{{ 354:: 333:: 304:: 280:}} 274:{{ 261:}} 255:{{ 204:: 126:: 70:← 4509:) 4505:( 4499:M 4479:) 4475:( 4469:M 4246:K 4209:/ 3943:) 3938:· 3932:· 3926:· 3920:· 3914:· 3908:· 3903:( 3883:( 3828:) 3824:( 3818:M 3815:— 3810:Y 3766:) 3752:( 3722:7 3677:7 3499:· 3494:( 3309:· 3304:( 3270:) 3266:( 3260:M 3128:( 3044:( 2992:( 2111:( 2020:. 1142:) 1137:· 1131:· 1125:· 1119:· 1113:· 1107:· 1101:· 1096:( 913:) 909:( 903:M 874:) 870:( 864:M 692:c 690:/ 688:t 357:/ 336:/ 307:/ 207:/ 129:/ 56:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index