User talk:Kingboyk/Archive 18

37: 587:

civility and a great deal of time and effort. I put my ego to one side for that, and I'm fucked if I will do it again over the matter. If I can be shown that I was incorrect, or that there is a better and more relevant basis for changing policy, then I will hold my hands up and admit I was wrong. For now I am happy just to patrol the five main pages, and add my tuppence to the talk pages like any other editor.

572:) you could change the policy. Referring to previous consensus? You may lose a couple of the remaining contributors over that. Other than Andrew and Tony/Vera the other editors departed when the aforementioned attempted to change policy without achieving consensus or providing references, even though some preferred using the capital T, so I also don't see what changing it back will achieve. 3331: 2242: 3793:

regexp error) but is also simply a matter of keeping enough people on one page. Judging from the fact that outsiders rarely comment/vote on elections even when noticed makes me feel that we need a few people to volunteer to stay active here. I do worry however, that without community support that people will start ignoring it.

906:

categories people (I've interacted with him more that Mike Selinker), which shamelessly ignores the contributions of many others to those projects, but hey, it's the impressions floating around in my head that matter... And yes, my username makes clear what I would prefer to be editing if everything else wasn't so darn

1938:, and it says that a personal website on the person themself is an ok to use, which the MySpace and the site are. So, can these be used as a source? Is it possible you could put the contents of the article at the latest point somewhere for me to look at, so I can base a new article on that information? Cheers. 777:. Oh well, as long as the relevant people ones stay relatively well organised. The worrying thing is that some people still insist on putting individual categories (such as birth and death year) on the eponymous category, rather than on the article (or on both). What do you think of those categories now? 3832:. I was sorry to read that you (and others) were unhappy at what happened, and I sympathise. My view, as I've said, is that it could all have been easily avoided with more communication. The thread I link to raises issue of having important information more transparently available and easily accessible. 1896:

Hi. Thanks for your reply. Can you point out a few of the problems from it, as I did improve it yesterday? I do realise the original version was very, very poor, and I will speak to the person that has did it, as I know them personally. Also, did I put in references, as I know most of the information

1886:

Hi. It's not just notability. The article wasn't encyclopedic. It read like a piece from a directory or a fan site. If you started again on a temporary page in your userspace and made it read like an encyclopedia article, with references, you may well be able to persuade people that we should have an

1818:

Actually, I just came here to ask exactly that myself. While I can appreciate having more complex templates (infoboxes, for example) split up like that, I don't think this one is even nearly complicated enough to warrant taking up that much extra space. It's a lot easier to see each banner and then

1784:

I've recently noticed your bot adding the living=no parameter to several articles and would ask that it keeps the WPBiography banner in one line, rather than expanding it to multiple lines. The one line version takes up less verticle space when other editors are modifying a talk page. It also looks

1415:

section as I have left the project forever. I do not intend to come back here and I want no Knowledge members contact me in the future. In case you want to say something, I ask you to place your statement under this request message at your talk page, please. I will appreciate it. Have a nice evening!

1140:

Hi. I think you just had a go at moving Dates in Harry Potter to Chronology of Harry Potter stories? If not, take it that I am as lost as the articles history. The original article has a history as long as your arm, not just 12 entries. I don't know what happened to them, but they are missing. So is

365:

has now been created out of council consensus, However it is intended to be a part of both Biography and Films. As I am not permitted to edit the main bio template please can you think about intergrating a whole new section for example film=yes to the template. It needs all the project categories etc

3644:

You were the only person in the debate who wanted it deleted, so really you're wasting my time and yours by even asking - I could have closed with a summary of "cabbages" and it wouldn't have been incorrect :) Nevertheless: merge and keep are the same because merging is an editorial decision, and we

2595:

It was from the HDD, just is it precisely that same as got onto Wiki. If I gave it to you in "nowiki" form it would only appear the same but without formatting. I agree I think there is a buglet that subdivides the title under some circumstances, in this case at least when a ":" character appears in

1795:

But that's a personal preference you see. I prefer it multi-line, it's much easier for folks to work with that way imho. The thing is, the bot has done over 200,000 edits and as far as I can recall you're the first to complain. I'm not going to change a tried and trusted approach on the basis of one

1352:

There won't be an edit war, as I won't revert without discussion (bold, revert, discuss, but I'm waiting for other folks to do the "discuss" bit because I'm not that bothered :) ). So, how about I let you pretend to be me and you can go ask? :P I suspect it's a decision of the IRC cartel though, see

586:

Will I come back? I don't think so, since I took the position that I based my decision on application of WP rules and guidelines and put aside my own preferences in attempting to mediate the correct interpretation of policy. I defended the decision, in the face of emotive language, with courtesy and

1828:

I see, thank you very much for the input. It's configured in my program as a configuration option per template. Most use one line, but as WPBio has so many possible parameters I have that on multiple lines. I've noted your opinion though and will think about it some more. Certainly, as I said, if I

559:

Thanks for your note. I remain of the view that capitalising the T is correct, as "The" forms part of their name and is therefore a proper noun. This is what I was taught (although that was a very long time ago). You may recall that it was I who took this question to some WP Grammarians who agreed

388:

Unfortunately I've had serious computer problems today and have lost pretty much a whole day trying to fix it. I've plenty of stuff to do and work queued up. Could you perhaps make the changes yourself in a sandbox, and just ask me to post the edit for you? Or could you ask another admin who knows

1100:

When I wondered why I hadn't been contacted about AWB for a while, I went back to check the history of the approvals page, and I noticed you'd removed my name from the list, but hadn't given a notice as to my status (and perhaps not the other users, as well—not sure). Could you elaborate on that?

505:

Much thanks! I'm real appreciative. I hope that more people, and quality editors, get involved with the metal articles. Thus far all the Project (if you can call it that) page has is genre debates (sigh). I hope I can still help with metal articles, though my contributions will be lesser as I get

772:

really took off? (I commented extensively on the previous talk page and at a CfD). I keep check ing back on that periodically, and wondering whether it is possibly to rein in the beast that it is. I call them portal-like categories. The relevance to your comment at CfD is that they often contain

3792:

I am not resigning (though am considering it) as I am not really concerned so much about philosophically needing community support. I just want it to be as helpful and reasonable as possible. The job is supposed to be somewhat technocratic (it comes in handy sometimes, like when I pointed out a

3654:

Not really... you maintain that this information is not repeated. I am sure if you actually read some of the merges or asked their editors they would not admit to having put merge purely for direct merging, but because they were in agreement that this isnormation should be deleted and the dates

2013:

Thanks for all your help. The version I showed you was my version, with a few spelling changes from another users, so it is good to hear I can write this stuff! Anyway, there is an article from a magazine available, if I remember rightly, so I will try and get a location online of it and try to

905:

bloke, aren't you? :-) First I run into the Eurovision Song Contest guy a few days ago, and now this. That was a rhetorical question by the way - I'm stereotyping you as the Beatles editor in the same way as I'd refer to Kirill (MilHist) and Titoxd (Hurricanes), and Samuel Wantman as one of the

3842:

I didn't see it, no. Thank you for the support and for pointing the thread out to me. I checked gmaxwell's user page and meta user page, and asked several times on what authority he was acting; it seemed reasonable for me as a (not self appointed!) BAG member to ascertain this but wasn't even

563:

I however changed the policy as I felt that the lowercase proponents had proven their case, that is they had provided the Guardian and Times style guides as evidence. Despite my requests in the newsletters there was no opposing argument or examples forthcoming. Unless you have found a better

1571:

I think your bot is probably very useful to newbies and so on, so thanks for that, it's just that I don't wanna start getting deluged with messages about low quality pages I touched as an admin :) Thanks for your understanding and prompt action on this, and indeed for the tip. Cheers.

2179:. It was possibly by design, but that design decision can be reviewed, right? :) The only time when we wouldn't their articles in the main bio list is if the non-bio=yes parameter is set (which means it's an article on a royal title or royal castle or something like that). -- 491:". I work deliberately on projects for a long time to get them to FA status, and I would like as much feedback on the article as I can get (which this peer review hasn't really generated so far, aside from one helpful reviewer). Thanks for any assistance you can provide. 1587:, and thanks to the .js extension it's automatically protected, whilst I can still edit it (which is a pretty cool MediaWiki feature!). The opt-out list should now be functional, and you shouldn't be getting anymore messages. Let me know if something goes wrong. Cheers, 960:

Pie or no, I agree with you. But it seems almost no one else does. As such I've refrained from from posting the same note to every proposed deletion to an eponymous category unless I think it's quite important. John Lennon would be such an important exception, I'd

3633:

was that the information was already merged into the main article. I am not putting it up for review as i am sure there is some magically version of english ou know in which merging details into another article also means keep the the article without merge?

1742:

What are you talking about? Where did I mention the project template? And don't you see that I'm offering to be of help?? Although if that's how you're going to react I suppose I should just send the list of film bios I made for tagging to the recycle bin.

1024:

there is an established category model to work any subcategory into (Books by Jan Smuts, Albums by Jan Smuts, etc), it should stay as it is. The "daughter" articles should of course be categorised into appropriate places, but not into new subcategories of

195:

I'm using Firefox. Is there an option somewhere I need to look at? I thought I had Asian languages installed (I have many Asian friends so although I don't read their languages I like to see the script). Maybe I don't have Khmer installed, who knows.

1141:

the entire discussion page. This smacks of a total screw up. Possibly the restored version is not the article, but the version edited by Michaesanders in his namespace after the original was deleted, which did not have the original history attached?

3655:

included seperately in the article (as they all already basically are. Anyway, thankyou for your time, your decision is final of coruse i really see no point in arguing it, i will try to keep this in mind when wording future deletion requests. --

2433: 441:

Simple enough. If they have to resort to shouting at you they evidently don't have consensus. I've not seen any valid reason for replacing references/, which isn't deprecated. They can come back if the village pump discussion supports them.

2003:

about how to cite sources; inline citation is preferred. An article like the version you've shown me, with the info cited inline from independent reliable sources, would be hard to turn down. (But I can't make any guarantees of course).

3970:

issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you."

1451:

I do not understand why you all are not willing to accept this final decision of mine. I see it as the attack on my personal (which may also be read as human) rights. I will appreciate your understanding and acceptance of my decision.

2315: 2023:

Your version was pretty good, yes, so don't worry :) I'm still inclined to believe that he is of limited notability, so you really must present references/citations. When that's done you can either come back to me, or you can post to

3958:

I'll go ahead and spam the newsletter out tomorrow if you're happy with it, seeing as Errabee seems to be. Basically just adding something like this to the 325 or so talk pages, unless you have a bot can do it - or could we borrow

1999:. Ideally, such things as newspapers. If those sources don't exist, he's not yet suitable material for an encyclopedia. If they do, I could present that version (with references) to other admins for consideration. Also, please see 1933:

I'm sure all of contact details had been removed, and if not, I would have removed them personally in due course. I didn't write the original article, and it was written by a young fan, who was inexperienced in articles.I read the

506:

more involved with my starting website (just metal interviews etc) as it takes up a lot of time. by myself A barnstar I feel is only as meaningful as the editor who has given it, and for that reason this one is deeply cherished.

2226:

Please have a look at my sandbox, as linked in the discussion. needs-photo=yes doesn't look right. Also, I'd prefer to keep blp etc functionality within WPBio if possible, using a div. (If not technically possible, fair enough).

369:{{bio|film=yes|director=yes|class=start|priority=high}} the bottom half of the bio template would read THis is maintained by the Actor and Filmmakers workgroup (and would have our icon of the Lumiere Brothers image by the side 207:

No, of course I don't object if I made a mistake :) Thanks for asking! Oh, and thanks for the link too, that's not how it appears here. Will check my browser settings as Mets suggest. Sorry about that, it was a genuine mistake.

1430:. Basically, you have a right to vanish, and that includes deletion of your userpage. I don't understand what protecting your page would achieve, however, if you're not around to see it and are adamantly leaving forever. -- 884:&c. Folks in other walks of lives often don't and that guideline would apply, but that guideline certainly doesn't apply to musicians. I think that's well established on CFD. (If you want to chat with a categorisation 420:? I've had enough of the abuse, and don't want anything to escalate, so if you would step in, that would be great. Thanks a ton. Also, if you think it should just be approved, then approve it, don't worry about me :-) — 1527:

Yes. It's your choice. But if I wanted to vanish I'd personally go "red". You chose not to, it's your call! Now, any further comments to the admin board please as I've passed this over to the wider community. Thanks.

1906:

Sure. It had lots of opinion and hyperbole in it. It had contacts details, including a premium rate telephone number. It was frivolous in tone. Also, MySpace and personal websites don't make good references - see

2114:

Could you possibly look into the reason why British Royalty doesn't appear in the WPBio categories anymore as soon as the british-royalty=yes parameter is added to thr WPBiography template? See for an example

2014:

reference from that. If I find the article, which may be hard, I will contact you, unless it is easier just to resubmit the article as normal, as seen if anyone contradicts it. Thanks again for your help.

1410:

Hello! I have just placed the proper templates at my former user page and my talk page. I would like to ask you if you could protect my user page and my discussion page from being edited by removing the

3967: 1712:

How are you doing this and do you have bot permission? I'd be happy to get the new param coded into my plugin and pass you the list I built, or indeed have my bot do the task as a priority matter. --

1312:

If you want to tell me, why don't you go ahead, so we don't have to play games :) I don't see anything on RFA talk, I'm not aware of any change, and his edit summary didn't give any great clue... --

4006: 3539: 1726:. User:Phantom had the parametes changed offically be requesting Biography add it to the template -surely it is common sense to you that I can't edit the biography template myself -it is locked 3861:

Thank you for your kind invitation, but I shall decline. I shall continue to vandal patrol and SPAG the major articles, and wish them the best for the future (and all who sally forth in them).

1284:

Hello, did you have a conversation with Thebainer just before you reverted him, or were you just about to go do that? (It took me a minute to see what he had removed)... interesting change. --

1253:

perhaps? Cauty?) because not only have I been busy with technical stuff, but we're floundering a bit... Vinoir came back and I expect he'll drift away again if we don't get something done :( --

233:

Consolidation. Articles get merged all the time. Sometimes they get split again when they're too long. Redirects with possibilities also get categorised all the time. Why does it bother you? --

3668:. In this case though you'd really be flogging a dead horse to try that venue I think, because the consensus was so clear. Thanks for the dialogue, though, and for keeping it civil, cheers. -- 3414:

I have no idea about how long Mimi has on the FAC but it looks promising, as we have had one support but no negative responses. What are the rules about this? Yours, Mr. No Idea About This

2256:

Thank you very much for persisting in putting the nested feature into WPBio! I appreciate it very much! From one techno-geek (me) to another (at least I assume you are) — Have a barnstar!

2534:

on your hard disk for me please? It may be that it's a Mediawiki/subst/template issue... (In the meantime, I can probably check that by simulating a log entry for these pages. BRB.) --

718:

Oh dear. Looks like he got blocked for personal attacks. I can't do anything about it as I'm not really impartial. I suggest if he wants to edit before the block expires, he uses the

1166:

What i mean is that according to the GDFL or whatever, the article is supposed to be accompanied by its history, and it isnt. This is a problem requiring an interested admin to fix?

867:

Oh, I'm sure we agree, I just happened to be looking up old pages and realising the subject was related to what we were discussing. We may not totally agree, though... Have you seen

583:

is a good editor, he is a copywriter and provided the Guardian example for using lowercase t. Will he leave? Will Andrew and Tony come back if policy changes? What will be the gain?

2341:

I already posted to your talk page with an update, but to an old thread - you must have missed it! :) Keep an eye out please, I'll reply to you again there with the latest stats. --

1235:

Woo! The Orb just passed FAC. So many props to you, kingboyk. Your feedback and work on the article have been more than invaluable. Great stuff and infinite thanks. Cheers!

926:

I'm in the process of editing the overcategorisation page, which of course you are welcome to review. What I'm putting is well established at CFD however (i.e. Mike agrees ;)). --

871:? I used to think any eponymous category was OK, but now I agree with the guidance there that, like anything, it should be done with care, making sure it is not just a link farm. 1347:(after edit conflict: And yes, you really should ask people when they make changes to significant pages... they might have interesting reasons, and it prevents edit wars, too :) 409: 3981:

I'll take a look, thanks for asking me... Ooh, well for a start, I upped the number of articles to 350,000, so the percentage needs to be recalculated and my comment removed!

141:

I think you answer your own question don't you; evidently it looks to me like a question mark. I have Asian languages installed, so that's bizarre. How's it meant to look? --

1670: 1267:

Sure ya did, you were there every step along the way adding your own material, providing me with material, and commenting on the stuff I did. Give yourself a ubx. :-)

1653:- who have been developing the articles in question - would really prefer not to have the boxes cluttering up the Talk pages. They are also confusing for new editors. - 3508:

I agree that she wasn't notable in life, that's why I think this shouldn't be in scope of WikiProject Biography, but it should be something like a murder case article.

1010:, which seems wrong somehow. I feel the daughter articles should still be categorised by date and location - eg. the Transvaal, Boer War, and so on. What do you think? 2649:

I did notice that is recorded not "subst:lat|The Arctic Incident" but "subst:lat| The Arctic Incident" - but I'm note sure what the extra space does, if anything. ::

1038:

Thanks for the advice. I've done a quick and dirty job of categorising the daughter articles. I've replied to your other message on my talk page. I'm off to eat now.

534:

You tagged the Society for Creative Anachronism page for the Military History project. Sadly, I think it doesn't mention history in that detail. I'm removing the tag

1200:; I repaired it, but thought you'd want to have a look. We've had lots of issues on that page, so I had the blp and warning banners separated for a reason. Best, 509:

On another note, I look forward to seeing more GAs / FAs from "The KLF" Project, though you'll have to wait for the GAs (God, have you seen how long it's taking?).

1876:

has been deleted. As far as I can tell, the criteria was related to a being a musician, and he is not, instead being a DJ on a radio station in London. Cheers.

484: 3398:

Erm... well... my email response times are quite shocking, I must confess. You know where to find me, if you come and say hi you can get an instant reply :) --

242:

It doesn't bother me as such, just that I've not seen a redirect page with categories before. Not too sure what this "redirect with possibilities" is though.

2577:

subst seems to work... (subst:lat|Artemis Fowl: The Arctic Incident). What's the log file say for that article? "subst:lat|The Arctic Incident" presumably? --

1125:

Me? I don't remember, if it was - I'll need a diff please. Anyway, the approvals page does say that you must keep an eye on the page and won't be informed. --

1175:

Mmmm... well if it was recreated via a userfied version then yes you probably have a point. I'll restore the entire history then. Thanks for the heads up. --

3596:

you will read, "Bill Drummond, who spent the late '80s and early '90s crafting music that topped the British charts with groups the KLF..." Interest, ya? --

1851: 362: 2098:

Thank you for the approval. The userbox is not mine, but SMS is a bery nasty thing for communication, thank you again for helping the fight against it :p

1553:

Hi kingboyk, there is no opt-out list yet, but I will immediately create one, and put you on it. It's also worth noting that my bot is compliant with the

2158:

Ok, thanks for the answer, although it seems odd to me, as it is the only work-group that doesn't have their articles listed in the Biography listings.

1707:

Well, hold your horses! I haven't written the new parameter into my plugin yet! :) I also have a very large list of film bios queued up for bot tagging.

1155:

and then delete a couple of edits which were just redirects resulting from the move. So, I basically left it as I found it but with a different name. --

3395:

Thank you Sharon! That's a lovely picture. It was fantastic to hear your news, and pretty great to see that you're back doing adminy type stuff too :)

2428:

Actually it tries to make a change to the article (it appears to succeed) and then says that is has updated the "wrong" article name in the log. See

1805:

I probably should have mentioned: if there's any discussion on it I will of course abide by consensus, and fear not - it can be changed by modifying

3993: 1249:

kudos too :o) Now, I want to see another FA from you so I can proudly issue you with the FA medal! :) You might want to help us with a KLF article (

3678: 3724:

I'm not going to wheel over this block, as the operator has seemed to make some adjustments, but this bot still appears to be racing. Please see

2586:

Nope I wanted the text from the file on the HDD, in nowiki format. But don't worry about it, this is probably a bug so I'm looking at the code. --

1630:

Funnily enough, I found it this evening and have been thinking about how to reply :) Will reply later or tommorow; for now you have my thanks. --

1915:; although it's primary focus is on notability, I think it helps write a good biography too. Finally, if you need any assistance please ask at 479:

Hi, I've seen much of your work on Knowledge, particularly that on the KLF, which I find well-done, and you gave a support vote at the FAC for

1960:

Thanks for doing that, however, that isn't the version that I edited last night. It was completely revamped. Could you look into it? Cheers.

252: 3094: 1916: 1646: 3933:

Noted the biography tags you added to this article's talk page. Are you sure they belong there given it's about the fictional character?

3813:

Yes indeed. Well, let's hope some good comes of the discussions then. Thanks for writing to me personally about this, I appreciate it. --

2041:

I think he is probably of limited notability, but I'm doing this for other people, who want him on here! Cheers again. Over and out too!

223:

Hi! If it is not the same as Apple, but currently shares an article, why doesn't it have it's own article, instead of being a redirect?

2698: 3593: 2149:. Conclusion: It doesn't appear to be broken. I forget why it would have been done that way, but there was probably a reason for it! -- 1722:

I haven't touched anything so don';t tell me what to do. User:Phantom and User:Nehrams have already begun extensive tagging as part of

3725: 3308: 3140: 2314:

I seem to remember a discussion somewhere where figures of 100s of thousands of bio articles were being tagged. I've been glancing at

417: 3057: 2553: 2463: 2368: 2297: 3886: 3195: 2481: 2386: 2333: 3311:) to do the film bios for me. If there's any problem or you need more categories done please let me or that bot's owner know. -- 300:

Royalty? Are you sure? (I'm not doubting your expertise by the way, just want to be 100% sure so I don't get into trouble :)) --

3630: 3103: 2490: 2395: 1982:

It seems some idiot reverted the article to an old version, which was completely rubbish. Can you have a look at this version,

1785:

better in one line when combined with other banners, or if the banners are inside a WikiProjectBanners template. Thank you. -

832: 659: 3065: 2561: 2050:

Sorry to contact you again. However, someone has recreated the article in the previous, bad version. Can you delete? Cheers.

708:

has been blocked for 24 hours for uncovering a POV pushing Sock on the grounds of a personal attack - how does that work la?

3203: 3048: 2544: 1151:

Nope. The original article was deleted, and the history safely hidden away in the database when I intervened. All I did was

847: 820: 813: 769: 3610:

Kind of, but I'm not sure it's very significant, alas. Thanks for the heads up though, at least I've learnt something :) --

3478: 3471: 3428:) makes the final decision. He'd want to see several supports, and check the article himself, before promoting, I guess. -- 3186: 3111: 3149: 2472: 2377: 2267: 2214: 836: 686: 100: 92: 87: 75: 70: 65: 3281:

Hey sorry about the other day i misinterprtetd what you meant. I didn't see the assessment list Keep up the great work!

3157: 2146: 2116: 1197: 868: 3988:

Best ask a bot to do the delivery. I'll do the asking this time, but for future use you might want to note the venue -

3943:

No they most certainly don't. It's probably a categorisation error; I will look into it. Thank you for the heads up. --

2616:

Incorrect this time, sorry :) The file on your HDD includes "subst:something". Paste it in, and it gets substituted! --

1723: 1650: 840: 649: 3777:

Oh I see. Sorry. I'll have to reread it, I thought you were having a laugh about it with him. Humble apologies! :) --

2530:

Yep. It always logs the talk page, but it looks like the bit before the colon is getting zapped. Could you check the

3645:

never delete the merged article because of copyright issues. We just replace it with a redirect. Hope that helps. --

2203:

shows it working okay - can you give me an example where it's not? Maybe I can figure out what needs to change. --

3893: 3034: 2908: 2848: 2800: 2752: 2405:

Are all processed aright as far as I can see but the log records the title from the ":" onwards which is wrong. ::

1584: 1245:

That's really excellent news, and an unqualified support from Tony is a rare treasure! (Not only that, but he gave

750: 709: 44: 3583:

I don't know. I doubt it, because it seems to be very much centred on Chicago, but I suppose it could be. Pass. --

1986:, as this is the version that should have been available? If this had references added it, would it be ok? Cheers 309:

royalty-work-group covers royalty and nobility. I think it is bizarre but that is the way it is at the moment. -

3710:

where I've explained why I can't do it, and where other bot owners can see the request. Thanks, and apologies. --

2862: 2200: 2176: 2142: 1354: 1003: 881: 880:

My main area of interest is music and musicians. Every notable performer needs an eponymous category, because of

575:

I really hope you will ask a few of the other editors who left how they would feel if the policy were to change.

390: 1873: 1334:

I have no idea either, and I'm terribly curious. But you're the person who gets first dibs on asking... So like

3843:

dignified with a reply until it was way too late. I'm glad that some folks see this too and thank you again. --

3706:

Hi Kittybrewster, Much as I'd like to help, it's not really possible at the moment. I've moved your request to

3444: 3282: 1754: 1727: 1692: 669: 622:

I think I'll defer to your judgement on this one. I'm sure we both have better things to do with our time :) --

370: 333: 2925: 2467: 3491:

But probably shouldn't be :) Just pointing it out so you don't waste your time or cause miscategorisation. --

3424:

Yeah, it looks promising. We just have to wait for now, and hope we get some more feedback. The FA Director (

2485: 2879: 2625:

Of course - durrr - just forgot my name - I'll go home and try and remember - glad you are on your toes. ::

2138: 1930:

to work on the article. It won't get deleted from there as it's not the "main space" reserved for articles.

948: 488: 385:

What do you mean by "council consensus"? I've no doubt this is a good idea, I'm just intrigued by that term.

341: 314: 290: 166: 154: 132: 1056: 3829: 3795: 3760: 3707: 3601: 3573: 3302: 2494: 2476: 1208: 1060: 2954: 255:

has some info and links. If you discover I'm blatantly wrong come back and slap me with a wet trout :) --

3924:

Tally so far: 2 reject, 1 accept, 1 doesn't currently have the time but doesn't reject. Status: Unclear.

3265: 3262: 2917: 2659: 2656: 2635: 2632: 2606: 2603: 2519: 2516: 2446: 2443: 2415: 2412: 2362: 480: 1948: 1927: 127:? It is not a question mark, that's just how your screen displays it. It is actually the symbol of the 3017: 1819:

work from there when they're each on one line, than when one's split and who knows about the others. -

3742:

I agree with you. I didn't unblock for him to proceed at that rate. If he's still racing, reblock. --

3000: 2871: 2329: 2321: 1619: 1427: 998:. I agree that the eponymous categories shouldn't have those categories, and they are on the article 828: 2971: 535: 3862: 2372: 2032:. (Second route is more direct, as I'd just do that on your behalf if you ask me). Over and out! -- 1108: 851: 614: 591: 413: 2831: 2503: 1984:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User%3AAdamiow%2FTemp&diff=122540410&oldid=122540184

3905: 3828:

Just in case you didn't see it, one of the talk page threads spawned after the WP:BON thread was

3734: 3683: 3629:

I would like to ask in what way Merge is the same as keep. My entire argument for the removal of

2390: 1995:

That version is a lot better, but I'd prefer to see multiple non trivial independent sources per

1860: 1679: 1519: 1487: 1453: 1417: 1026: 1007: 962: 889: 579:

was a real find, and was shaping up to be an excellent all round contributor. Will he come back?

576: 510: 337: 310: 286: 53: 17: 613:

the decision was made, so finding out what the reaction might be will help inform your choices.

2783: 3765: 3597: 3569: 3546: 3512: 3298: 2814: 2399: 2263: 2210: 2162: 2137:

That appears to be the way it's always behaved. I put an October 2006 version of the template

2123: 1201: 682: 461: 430: 185: 3865: 3297:

That's alright, I thought it was probably a misuderstanding/language barrier. I've recruited

3989: 3415: 3256: 2735: 2650: 2626: 2597: 2510: 2437: 2406: 2084:<--Done, and the user in question was given a short block as he's becoming disruptive. -- 1377: 1339: 1304: 1285: 1268: 1236: 1076: 858:

be the former. The entire point of the new category was that it created a new top level. --

722: 705: 492: 366:

as all the mediums Actors, directors, cinematographers, editors, producers, score etc. e.g

150: 3882:

Thank you for your invitation which I gladly accept. Cheers la, offta werk now like. BTW,

3833: 3656: 3635: 3565: 3482: 3009: 2766: 2381: 2325: 2293: 1786: 1663: 1614: 1039: 1011: 939: 911: 872: 804: 791: 778: 774: 520: 951:

Mike. Maybe I shall have to eat humble pie, the taste of which is no stranger to me :) --

609:

Yup, Lar will be good. So would the editors I mentioned above; I had most of my problems

483:. Given your experience with song articles, I was wondering if you'd take a look at the 4020:

Looks fine to me, I'll post the 'all-clear' over at WP:BOTREQ unless you already have.

3531: 3502: 3481:(and had been since July 2006) and I was doing a bit of reorganization, that was all – 3353: 2963: 2000: 1654: 1502:

which are extremely strange for me.. ????? The templates precisely state that the user

1167: 1142: 1113: 1103: 600:

Thanks for writing. I really don't know what to do then. Perhaps I shall ask Lar! :) --

580: 569: 128: 1486:

has recently been removed from my pages and I was forced to put them again. Thanks. --

4030: 4010: 3997: 3944: 3912: 3872: 3844: 3814: 3778: 3743: 3729: 3711: 3669: 3665: 3646: 3611: 3584: 3535: 3492: 3460: 3429: 3399: 3312: 3246: 2718: 2688: 2670: 2617: 2587: 2578: 2535: 2499: 2429: 2342: 2228: 2180: 2150: 2085: 2033: 2005: 1974: 1952: 1935: 1920: 1912: 1888: 1855: 1830: 1810: 1797: 1796:

complaint, sorry. Change in consensus, yes, difference in personal preference, no. --

1770: 1744: 1713: 1674: 1631: 1597: 1588: 1573: 1562: 1558: 1557:

facility, which allows you to manually "ban" my bot from editing your user page. See

1554: 1529: 1474: 1431: 1358: 1326: 1313: 1295: 1254: 1219: 1176: 1156: 1126: 1086: 1030: 952: 927: 920: 893: 859: 737: 698: 623: 601: 565: 545: 443: 394: 324: 301: 256: 234: 209: 197: 142: 124: 4033: 4024: 4013: 4000: 3975: 3947: 3937: 3915: 3896: 3875: 3847: 3836: 3817: 3807: 3781: 3771: 3746: 3736: 3714: 3689: 3672: 3659: 3649: 3638: 3614: 3605: 3587: 3577: 3554: 3520: 3495: 3485: 3463: 3453: 3432: 3418: 3402: 3377: 3315: 3291: 3270: 3249: 2691: 2673: 2664: 2640: 2620: 2611: 2590: 2581: 2538: 2524: 2451: 2420: 2345: 2304: 2273: 2231: 2220: 2183: 2170: 2153: 2131: 2104: 2088: 2054: 2045: 2036: 2018: 2008: 1990: 1977: 1964: 1955: 1942: 1923: 1901: 1891: 1880: 1862: 1833: 1823: 1813: 1800: 1789: 1773: 1763: 1747: 1736: 1716: 1701: 1681: 1657: 1634: 1624: 1600: 1591: 1576: 1565: 1532: 1522: 1490: 1477: 1456: 1434: 1420: 1380: 1361: 1342: 1329: 1316: 1307: 1298: 1288: 1271: 1257: 1239: 1222: 1212: 1179: 1170: 1159: 1145: 1129: 1089: 1079: 1063: 1042: 1033: 1014: 965: 955: 942: 930: 914: 896: 875: 862: 807: 794: 781: 740: 712: 692: 626: 617: 604: 594: 590:

Thanks for asking, mate, but this rankles like a bitch. I hope you see my position.

548: 538: 523: 513: 495: 466: 446: 435: 397: 379: 345: 327: 318: 304: 294: 268: 259: 246: 237: 227: 212: 200: 190: 169: 157: 145: 135: 3934: 3551: 3543: 3517: 3509: 3425: 2823: 2258: 2205: 2167: 2159: 2128: 2120: 2101: 2051: 2042: 2025: 2015: 1996: 1987: 1961: 1939: 1908: 1898: 1877: 1470: 923:

bloke (or one of em), we got FA of the day recently so that's had better results :)

677: 453: 422: 265: 243: 224: 177: 3534:

has stumbled on my testpages for the A-class review department, and has submitted

2241: 175:

I've reverted it. Kingboyk, you have your browser set to UTF-8 encoding, right? —

816:

is a great idea; in many (perhaps most) cases an eponymous category should be in

544:

The article was wrongly categorised, which I've fixed. Thanks for alerting me. --

2434:

Knowledge:WikiProject Novels/Automation/Logs/160407 Novels by country Part Two 2

2318:, but no big increase yet. Will it take time for the numbers to filter through? 2029: 52:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3992::) Note also that a few awkward people have specified delivery instructions at 3330: 1218:

No, that was me, manually. I removed what looked like a load of crud. Sorry. --

3408: 2775: 2669:

Likely a symptom of a over-zealous formatting procedure. I'm investigating. --

1069: 1445:

prevent them from being edited by anybody by blocking people's access to the

854:, or whether it's a subcat of People, then I agree with you: conceptually it 823:

or a subcategory. Of course, the eponymous category may then have non-people

2357:

Interesting. It seems to have something to do with the naming of the article

2301: 1820: 999: 3538:

for review. I'd appreciate your opinion (support or oppose) and reasons on

4021: 3972: 3234: 2727: 2705: 1294:

No, why should I have? I wanted to see the stats, and he removed them. --

3855: 1229: 902: 2145:. It looks the same, as far as I can see, as the April 07 template on 1473:

where the whole admin community can discuss your request. Thanks. --

560:

that this was the case, and the policy then remained to capitalise.

120: 1002:

instead. What do you think about the daughter articles though? See

4029:

We have a "postman", feel free to post the all clear. Cheers. --

3237: 2708: 919:

I started that project, yes, so must plead guilty. I'm also the

3985:. Apart from that, I'm happy with it and think it's good to go. 3564:

By the way, is the Bill Drummond mentioned as a founder of the

1829:

sense the consensus is one line I'm happy to oblige. Cheers. --

1428:

User_talk:AnonEMouse#A_request_to_the_Wikipedia_administrator_2

846:

Now what was the question? :) If you're asking if I agree that

3871:

OK. I respect your decision, thank you for letting me know. --

1497:

If you really want to leave and disappear, leave your page red

1376:

remaining lives, doesn't mean everyone else has to be. ;-) --

31: 4007:

Knowledge:WikiProject Biography/Outreach/Newsletter/Issue 004

3963:"The WikiProject Biography Newsletter: Issue II - April 2007 3679:

User talk:Daniel.Bryant/Archive/Contesting Merge AfD Closures

251:

I'm not sure where that stuff is all documented tbh... hmm...

3540:

Knowledge:WikiProject Biography/A-class review/Leonard Orban

3329: 2687:

Problem identified and (hopefully) fixed in next version. --

2028:

asking if the article is now up to scratch and can it go to

1669:

I've got a question on a recent denial of yours, please see

1439:

Thank you for the message. I ask you, the administrator, to

1260:

PS Did I do enough to put this as a userbox on my page? You

869:

Knowledge:Overcategorization#Eponymous categories for people

1897:

can be referenced from his website or his MySpace? Cheers.

1385:

does that mean that on the internet, no one knows you're a

641:

Thanks for the comment! If it makes you feel any better,

3994:

Knowledge:WikiProject_Biography/Outreach#Delivery_options

2432:

which it has tagged then reporting it as "A Novel" as in

827:, which is fine and how it's meant to work. For example, 1647:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biography#Requst_re_infoboxes

3211: 3207: 3199: 3191: 3165: 3161: 3153: 3145: 3119: 3115: 3107: 3099: 3073: 3069: 3061: 3053: 3025: 3021: 3013: 3005: 2979: 2975: 2967: 2959: 2933: 2929: 2921: 2913: 2887: 2883: 2875: 2867: 2839: 2835: 2827: 2819: 2791: 2787: 2779: 2771: 2743: 2739: 2731: 2723: 2569: 2565: 2557: 2549: 1983: 1970: 1500: 1264:

say no if I didn't, I don't want to take false credit.

1085:

Right on man, I'll take a look and then nominate it. --

995: 935: 800: 787: 765: 117: 165:

So, do you object if I revert to my earlier redirect?

1691:

I have finally begun tagging for film bio articles!!

564:

authority then I don't see on what basis (apart from

3996:(I can say "awkward" because I'm one of them :)). -- 2459:

In fact it appears to log against the Talk page ie.

410:

Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/Rschen7754bot 3

1911:about reliable sources. You might also want to see 1641:

Biography Project boxes on opera composers, singers

1366:Fair enough. Just because I'm all cavalier with my 1020:I think with only 14 articles in the category, and 994:While ferretting around people categories, I found 812:I'm not really sure what you're asking me. I think 1671:Knowledge talk:Bots/Requests for approval/VshBot 2 391:outstanding request for a needs-succession-box=yes 285:WikiProject France and royalty-work-group=yes - 1561:for more information on how to do this. Cheers, 1549:Re: AFD bot - opting out should be a possibility 850:should be a top-level category, i.e. just below 26: 3726:Knowledge:Bot_owners'_noticeboard#Cydebot_Block 1872:Hi. Could you explain why the page relating to 1426:Hi. For the sake of threading, I've replied at 1075:I think she's ready for a good FA gang-bang... 773:non-people articles, but are still lumped into 389:how to edit complex templates? There's also an 2711:20:00 Start button clicked. Initialising log. 1325:should I have", not "why, should I have?". -- 8: 3757:Why else do you think I poked David Gerard? 1926:PS: Feel free to create a user subpage like 1055:The page you were asking Hesperian about is 704:Alright Steve? This is to let you know that 1852:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/VshBot 799:Correction. That edit was reverted. It was 363:Knowledge:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers 4009:, simply to make adding navbars easier. -- 3664:Admin decisions are never final; there is 2175:Yes indeed. You might want to raise it at 1753:If the bot can do it that would save time 264:Hehe, will do! Thanks for your help too. 2239: 1516:This user has decided to leave Knowledge. 833:Category:Categories named after musicians 790::-) I'll change that one and add a note. 728:template and promises to comment only on 3753:But I did think it was a personal attack 3592:I see now that it is. If you scan down 3341:With your warmth and humor till the end, 1449:sections of the pages mentioned earlier. 1406:A request to the Knowledge administrator 3708:Knowledge:Bot_requests#Succession_boxes 2361:These four all belong to one category: 1303:Yes. So do you know why he did that? -- 3049:Talk:Artemis Fowl: The Arctic Incident 2545:Talk:Artemis Fowl: The Arctic Incident 1443:my user page and my talk page i.e. to 1196:Hey there ! The bot really messed up 848:Category:Categories named after people 821:Category:Categories named after people 814:Category:Categories named after people 770:Category:Categories named after people 50:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3479:Category:Knowledge cleanup categories 3477:I added it because it was already in 3472:Category:Novel articles with comments 3343:So dear Stevie, all I can tell you... 3255:Top quality service as always, Ta :: 3187:Talk:Artemis Fowl: The Opal Deception 1645:Can I refer you to the discussion at 1006:. All the articles there are just in 253:Category:Redirects with possibilities 7: 3095:Talk:Artemis Fowl: The Eternity Code 1917:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Biography 1482:Please, inform me why the templates 3339:You're always there when I need you 1973:, old revisions should be there. -- 3141:Talk:Artemis Fowl: The Lost Colony 3041:User: Skipped: User clicked Ignore 2855:User: Skipped: User clicked Ignore 2807:User: Skipped: User clicked Ignore 2759:User: Skipped: User clicked Ignore 2509:Hence all these are redlinked. :: 2292:The comment I was referring to at 2288:Comment on infobox-missing-tagging 1780:Bot editing of WPBiography banners 24: 3345:is I'm honored to be your friend. 2464:Artemis Fowl: The Arctic Incident 2369:Artemis Fowl: The Arctic Incident 1724:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers 665:yet :) And I found a third one: 637:WPBIO and nested template support 358:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers 3445: 3283: 3225:Kingbotk Plugin Manager: Skipped 3179:Kingbotk Plugin Manager: Skipped 3133:Kingbotk Plugin Manager: Skipped 3087:Kingbotk Plugin Manager: Skipped 2993:Kingbotk Plugin Manager: Skipped 2947:Kingbotk Plugin Manager: Skipped 2901:Kingbotk Plugin Manager: Skipped 2482:Artemis Fowl: The Opal Deception 2387:Artemis Fowl: The Opal Deception 2240: 1755: 1728: 1693: 947:I believe I'm correct, but I've 371: 323:Ah, OK. Thanks for your help! -- 35: 3631:Virginia Tech massacre timeline 3361: 3359: 3357: 3355: 3325: 2491:Artemis Fowl: The Seventh Dwarf 2396:Artemis Fowl: The Seventh Dwarf 1051:Re Wikiproject reform talk page 412:, and the resulting discussion 2436:item 122. Does that help. :: 1951:. You can work on it there. -- 1514:. I will remind that it says: 803:from November that persisted. 393:if somebody could fix that. -- 1: 3763:, your friendly neighborhood 3568:the same one from The KLF? -- 2473:Artemis Fowl: The Lost Colony 2378:Artemis Fowl: The Lost Colony 2186:(I'll delete the sandbox now) 1495:I have just seen your words: 1469:administrator. Please ask at 892:, he knows everything! :)) -- 837:Category:Books by John Lennon 835:and contains such subcats as 760:Categories named after people 3728:for an udpate. Thank you, — 3459:Glad you like it. Thanks. -- 2147:Talk:Aldfrith of Northumbria 2117:Talk:Aldfrith of Northumbria 1198:Talk:The Naked Brothers Band 4005:Good to go AFAIC. Moved to 2296:about missing infoboxes is 2201:Knowledge talk:Sandbox/blp1 1868:Adam Morris (The General E) 1355:User talk:Ryanpostlethwaite 841:Category:John Lennon albums 4058: 4034:22:22, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 4025:22:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 4014:22:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 4001:20:08, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3976:20:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3948:18:30, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3938:18:25, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3916:18:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3897:18:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3876:13:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3866:12:51, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3848:13:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3837:12:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3818:01:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3808:01:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3782:00:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3772:00:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3747:15:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 3737:15:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 3715:23:01, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 3690:00:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 3673:21:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3660:21:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3650:21:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3639:20:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3615:23:02, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 3606:14:38, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3588:14:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3578:14:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3555:15:41, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 3521:13:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 3496:13:33, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 3486:13:30, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 3464:13:33, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 3454:13:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 3433:20:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 3419:20:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 3403:13:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 3378:04:51, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 3316:11:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 3292:11:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 3271:07:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 3250:19:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 3240:20:02 Application closing. 3220:Novels: Skipped: No change 3174:Novels: Skipped: No change 3128:Novels: Skipped: No change 3082:Novels: Skipped: No change 2988:Novels: Skipped: No change 2942:Novels: Skipped: No change 2909:Talk:Artemis Fowl (series) 2896:Novels: Skipped: No change 2692:17:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2674:15:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2665:15:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2641:16:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2621:15:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2612:15:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2591:15:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2582:14:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2539:14:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2525:14:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2452:14:40, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2421:14:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2346:11:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2305:03:27, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2274:04:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 2232:14:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2221:14:04, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2184:13:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2171:13:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2154:13:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2132:12:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2105:23:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2089:11:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2055:21:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2046:20:56, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2037:20:47, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2019:20:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2009:20:30, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 1991:20:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 1978:20:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 1965:20:11, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 1956:20:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 1943:19:57, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 1924:18:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 1902:18:31, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 1892:18:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 1881:18:00, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 1874:Adam Morris (The GeneralE) 1863:02:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 1834:01:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 1824:01:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 1814:19:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 1801:18:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1790:18:38, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1774:14:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1764:14:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1748:14:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1737:14:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1717:14:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1702:14:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1682:01:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1658:00:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1635:21:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1625:21:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1601:18:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1592:18:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1585:User:Jayden54Bot/ignore.js 1583:I created the opt-list at 1577:19:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1566:19:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1533:19:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1523:19:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1491:19:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1478:18:56, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1457:18:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1435:18:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1421:18:16, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1381:15:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1362:15:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1343:15:46, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1330:15:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1317:15:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1308:15:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1299:15:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1289:15:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1272:22:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1258:10:35, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1240:06:16, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1223:22:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1213:22:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1180:10:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1171:23:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1160:20:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1153:move the recreated version 1146:20:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1130:20:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1090:15:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1080:15:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1064:11:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1043:19:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1034:18:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1015:18:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 966:05:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 956:19:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 943:19:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 931:19:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 915:18:58, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 897:18:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 876:18:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 863:18:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 808:18:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 795:18:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 782:18:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 741:11:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 713:03:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 645:bot doesn't fully support 627:10:47, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 29: 3625:Merge is not Same as Keep 2863:Talk:Artemis Fowl (novel) 2246: 2177:Template talk:WPBiography 1004:Template:JanSmutsSegments 882:Category:Albums by artist 693:20:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 618:18:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 605:17:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 595:17:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 549:23:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 539:21:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 524:02:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 514:19:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 496:04:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 467:20:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 447:19:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 436:19:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 408:Do you mind dealing with 398:17:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 380:16:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 346:15:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 328:22:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 319:22:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 305:21:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 295:21:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 269:07:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 260:18:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 247:18:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 238:18:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 228:18:38, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 213:19:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 201:19:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 191:19:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 170:19:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 158:18:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 146:18:38, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 136:18:36, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 3443:THat bot is amazing!!!! 2468:Talk:The Arctic Incident 2110:British Royalty template 334:Category:French nobility 3887:WikiProject The Beatles 2486:Talk:The Opal Deception 1613:Did you get my e-mail? 901:Of course, you're that 768:, were you around when 489:Smells Like Teen Spirit 3894:Vera, Chuck & Dave 3853: 3526:A-class review request 3334: 2495:Talk:The Seventh Dwarf 710:Vera, Chuck & Dave 660:WikiProjectBannerShell 3983:It can't go out as is 3911:or something else? -- 3901:Great. Are you after 3333: 2363:Category:Artemis Fowl 2324:comment was added by 2250:The da Vinci Barnstar 2199:What's not working? 1136:Dates in Harry Potter 751:Alfa Two Four One OUT 481:The Smashing Pumpkins 48:of past discussions. 3001:Talk:Artemis Fowl II 2477:Talk:The Lost Colony 1506:the project and not 829:Category:John Lennon 3677:/me swings by with 2955:Talk:Artemis Fowl 6 2373:The Arctic Incident 2300:, to be specific. 1969:Have a look at the 1769:See above. Geez. -- 1555:bots opt-in/opt-out 1465:administrator, I'm 1120:11.04.07 2040 (UTC) 888:, have a word with 852:Category:Categories 475:Peer review request 3892:will not show up. 3335: 2391:The Opal Deception 1887:article on him. -- 1596:Clever! Thanks! -- 1338:go ask him? :-) -- 1027:Category:Jan Smuts 1008:Category:Jan Smuts 996:this edit of yours 890:User:Mike Selinker 650:WikiProjectBanners 577:User:John Cardinal 18:User talk:Kingboyk 4044: 4043: 3393: 3392: 3388: 3035:NovelsWikiProject 2849:NovelsWikiProject 2815:Talk:Artemis Fowl 2801:NovelsWikiProject 2753:NovelsWikiProject 2400:The Seventh Dwarf 2337: 2279: 2278: 1949:User:Adamiow/Temp 1928:User:Adamiow/Temp 1391: 1349: 1337: 1121: 675:! Sigh... :) -- 555:The t/The Beatles 457: 426: 344: 317: 293: 181: 106: 105: 60: 59: 54:current talk page 4049: 3910: 3904: 3891: 3885: 3804: 3801: 3798: 3770: 3732: 3702:Succession boxes 3686: 3549: 3515: 3451: 3382: 3373: 3371: 3369: 3367: 3365: 3326: 3289: 3259: 3216: 3215: 3170: 3169: 3124: 3123: 3078: 3077: 3030: 3029: 2984: 2983: 2938: 2937: 2892: 2891: 2844: 2843: 2796: 2795: 2748: 2747: 2653: 2629: 2600: 2574: 2573: 2513: 2440: 2409: 2352:Plugin behaviour 2319: 2272: 2271: 2244: 2237: 2236: 2219: 2218: 2165: 2126: 1858: 1761: 1734: 1699: 1677: 1649:. People at the 1383: 1345: 1335: 1205: 1119: 1116: 1111: 1106: 727: 721: 691: 690: 674: 670:Hidden infoboxes 668: 664: 658: 654: 648: 465: 455: 434: 424: 377: 340: 313: 289: 189: 179: 84: 62: 61: 39: 38: 32: 27: 4057: 4056: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4045: 4040: 3956: 3954:WP Bio delivery 3931: 3908: 3902: 3889: 3883: 3859: 3826: 3802: 3799: 3796: 3790: 3758: 3755: 3730: 3722: 3704: 3684: 3627: 3566:Micromentalists 3562: 3547: 3528: 3513: 3506: 3475: 3448:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 3441: 3412: 3387:check you mail? 3363: 3324: 3286:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 3279: 3268: 3257: 3189: 3185: 3143: 3139: 3097: 3093: 3051: 3047: 3003: 2999: 2957: 2953: 2911: 2907: 2865: 2861: 2817: 2813: 2769: 2767:Talk:Arno Blunt 2765: 2721: 2717: 2662: 2651: 2638: 2627: 2609: 2598: 2547: 2543: 2522: 2511: 2449: 2438: 2418: 2407: 2382:The Lost Colony 2354: 2320:—The preceding 2312: 2290: 2261: 2257: 2208: 2204: 2197: 2163: 2124: 2112: 2096: 1971:article history 1870: 1856: 1848: 1782: 1758:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 1731:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 1696:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 1689: 1675: 1667: 1643: 1611: 1551: 1408: 1282: 1233: 1203: 1194: 1138: 1114: 1109: 1104: 1098: 1073: 1053: 992: 990:More categories 788:Aaaaagghhhh!!!! 775:Category:People 762: 725: 719: 702: 680: 676: 672: 666: 662: 656: 652: 646: 639: 557: 532: 503: 477: 452: 451:Thanks a ton. — 421: 406: 374:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 360: 283: 281:French nobility 221: 176: 114: 80: 36: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4055: 4053: 4042: 4041: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4036: 4018: 4017: 4016: 3986: 3960: 3955: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3930: 3927: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3879: 3878: 3863:LessHeard vanU 3858: 3852: 3851: 3850: 3825: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3789: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3754: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3721: 3718: 3703: 3700: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3626: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3561: 3558: 3532:User:Michkalas 3527: 3524: 3505: 3503:Anna Svidersky 3500: 3499: 3498: 3474: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3440: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3411: 3406: 3391: 3390: 3376: 3350: 3346: 3344: 3342: 3340: 3336: 3323: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3278: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3266: 3243: 3242: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3222: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3176: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3130: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3084: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3038: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2990: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2944: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2898: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2852: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2804: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2756: 2714: 2713: 2702: 2699:WikiFunctions2 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2660: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2636: 2607: 2596:the title. :: 2575: 2520: 2507: 2506: 2497: 2488: 2479: 2470: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2447: 2416: 2403: 2402: 2393: 2384: 2375: 2359: 2358: 2353: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2311: 2308: 2289: 2286: 2284: 2281: 2277: 2276: 2253: 2252: 2247: 2245: 2235: 2234: 2196: 2195:WPBio template 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2141:, and used it 2111: 2108: 2095: 2092: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 1947:I moved it to 1869: 1866: 1847: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1781: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1751: 1750: 1720: 1719: 1709: 1708: 1688: 1685: 1666: 1661: 1642: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1610: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1580: 1579: 1550: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1447:edit this page 1413:edit this page 1407: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1336:(nudge, nudge) 1321:Btw, I meant " 1319: 1281: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1232: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1193: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1137: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1097: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1072: 1067: 1052: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 991: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 924: 844: 766:on the subject 764:While you are 761: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 744: 743: 701: 696: 638: 635: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 615:LessHeard vanU 592:LessHeard vanU 581:User:McTavidge 556: 553: 552: 551: 531: 528: 527: 526: 502: 499: 476: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 405: 402: 401: 400: 386: 359: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 338:Kittybrewster 311:Kittybrewster 287:Kittybrewster 282: 279: 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 272: 271: 220: 217: 216: 215: 205: 204: 203: 163: 162: 161: 160: 129:Cambodian riel 113: 112:Cambodian riel 110: 108: 104: 103: 98: 95: 90: 85: 78: 73: 68: 58: 57: 40: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4054: 4035: 4032: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4023: 4019: 4015: 4012: 4008: 4004: 4003: 4002: 3999: 3995: 3991: 3987: 3984: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3977: 3974: 3969: 3964: 3961: 3953: 3949: 3946: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3936: 3929:Bridget Jones 3928: 3926: 3925: 3917: 3914: 3907: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3895: 3888: 3881: 3880: 3877: 3874: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3864: 3857: 3849: 3846: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3835: 3831: 3823: 3819: 3816: 3812: 3811: 3810: 3809: 3806: 3805: 3787: 3783: 3780: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3768: 3767: 3762: 3752: 3748: 3745: 3741: 3740: 3739: 3738: 3735: 3733: 3727: 3719: 3717: 3716: 3713: 3709: 3701: 3691: 3688: 3687: 3685:Daniel Bryant 3680: 3676: 3675: 3674: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3658: 3653: 3652: 3651: 3648: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3637: 3632: 3624: 3616: 3613: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3586: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3575: 3571: 3567: 3560:Bill Drummond 3559: 3557: 3556: 3553: 3550: 3545: 3541: 3537: 3536:Leonard Orban 3533: 3525: 3523: 3522: 3519: 3516: 3511: 3504: 3501: 3497: 3494: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3484: 3480: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3462: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3452: 3450: 3449: 3439:Film bio tags 3438: 3434: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3417: 3410: 3407: 3405: 3404: 3401: 3396: 3389: 3386: 3380: 3379: 3375: 3374: 3351: 3349:Thank you! :) 3347: 3337: 3332: 3328: 3327: 3321: 3317: 3314: 3310: 3307: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3290: 3288: 3287: 3276: 3272: 3269: 3263: 3260: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3248: 3241: 3239: 3236: 3232: 3231: 3226: 3223: 3221: 3218: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3188: 3184: 3180: 3177: 3175: 3172: 3171: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3131: 3129: 3126: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3085: 3083: 3080: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3059: 3055: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3039: 3036: 3032: 3031: 3027: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3002: 2998: 2994: 2991: 2989: 2986: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2945: 2943: 2940: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2899: 2897: 2894: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2869: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2853: 2850: 2846: 2845: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2805: 2802: 2798: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2757: 2754: 2750: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2720: 2719:Talk:Ark Sool 2716: 2715: 2712: 2710: 2707: 2703: 2701:.dll v1.0.2.1 2700: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2690: 2675: 2672: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2663: 2657: 2654: 2648: 2642: 2639: 2633: 2630: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2619: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2610: 2604: 2601: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2589: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2580: 2576: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2546: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2523: 2517: 2514: 2505: 2501: 2500:Luna: A Novel 2498: 2496: 2492: 2489: 2487: 2483: 2480: 2478: 2474: 2471: 2469: 2465: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2453: 2450: 2444: 2441: 2435: 2431: 2430:Luna: A Novel 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2419: 2413: 2410: 2401: 2397: 2394: 2392: 2388: 2385: 2383: 2379: 2376: 2374: 2370: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2356: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2344: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2317: 2309: 2307: 2306: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2287: 2285: 2282: 2275: 2269: 2265: 2260: 2255: 2254: 2251: 2248: 2243: 2238: 2233: 2230: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2216: 2212: 2207: 2202: 2194: 2185: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2169: 2166: 2161: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2130: 2127: 2122: 2118: 2109: 2107: 2106: 2103: 2099: 2093: 2091: 2090: 2087: 2056: 2053: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2044: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2017: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2007: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1963: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1941: 1937: 1932: 1931: 1929: 1925: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1900: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1890: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1879: 1875: 1867: 1865: 1864: 1861: 1859: 1854:. Thanks, — 1853: 1850:I've updated 1845: 1835: 1832: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1822: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1812: 1809:of code :) -- 1808: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1799: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1788: 1779: 1775: 1772: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1762: 1760: 1759: 1749: 1746: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1735: 1733: 1732: 1725: 1718: 1715: 1711: 1710: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1700: 1698: 1697: 1686: 1684: 1683: 1680: 1678: 1672: 1665: 1662: 1660: 1659: 1656: 1652: 1651:Opera Project 1648: 1640: 1636: 1633: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1617: 1608: 1602: 1599: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1581: 1578: 1575: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1564: 1560: 1559:Template:Bots 1556: 1548: 1534: 1531: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1455: 1450: 1448: 1442: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1419: 1414: 1405: 1390: 1388: 1382: 1379: 1375: 1372: 1369: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1360: 1356: 1351: 1350: 1348: 1344: 1341: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1318: 1315: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1306: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1297: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1287: 1279: 1273: 1270: 1266: 1265: 1263: 1259: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1238: 1231: 1228: 1224: 1221: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1199: 1191: 1181: 1178: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1169: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1144: 1135: 1131: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1117: 1112: 1107: 1095: 1091: 1088: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1078: 1071: 1068: 1066: 1065: 1062: 1058: 1050: 1044: 1041: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1032: 1028: 1023: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 989: 967: 964: 963:Mike Selinker 959: 958: 957: 954: 950: 946: 945: 944: 941: 937: 934: 933: 932: 929: 925: 922: 918: 917: 916: 913: 909: 904: 900: 899: 898: 895: 891: 887: 883: 879: 878: 877: 874: 870: 866: 865: 864: 861: 857: 853: 849: 845: 842: 838: 834: 830: 826: 825:subcategories 822: 819: 815: 811: 810: 809: 806: 802: 798: 797: 796: 793: 789: 786: 785: 784: 783: 780: 776: 771: 767: 759: 752: 748: 747: 746: 745: 742: 739: 735: 731: 724: 717: 716: 715: 714: 711: 707: 700: 699:Brian Epstein 697: 695: 694: 688: 684: 679: 671: 661: 651: 644: 636: 628: 625: 621: 620: 619: 616: 612: 608: 607: 606: 603: 599: 598: 597: 596: 593: 588: 584: 582: 578: 573: 571: 567: 561: 554: 550: 547: 543: 542: 541: 540: 537: 529: 525: 522: 518: 517: 516: 515: 512: 511:LuciferMorgan 507: 500: 498: 497: 494: 490: 486: 482: 474: 468: 463: 459: 450: 449: 448: 445: 440: 439: 438: 437: 432: 428: 419: 415: 411: 403: 399: 396: 392: 387: 384: 383: 382: 381: 378: 376: 375: 367: 364: 357: 347: 343: 339: 335: 331: 330: 329: 326: 322: 321: 320: 316: 312: 308: 307: 306: 303: 299: 298: 297: 296: 292: 288: 280: 270: 267: 263: 262: 261: 258: 254: 250: 249: 248: 245: 241: 240: 239: 236: 232: 231: 230: 229: 226: 218: 214: 211: 206: 202: 199: 194: 193: 192: 187: 183: 174: 173: 172: 171: 168: 159: 156: 152: 149: 148: 147: 144: 140: 139: 138: 137: 134: 130: 126: 125:question mark 122: 119: 111: 109: 102: 99: 96: 94: 91: 89: 86: 83: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 55: 51: 47: 46: 41: 34: 33: 28: 19: 3982: 3965: 3962: 3957: 3932: 3923: 3922: 3860: 3827: 3794: 3791: 3766:MessedRocker 3764: 3756: 3723: 3705: 3682: 3628: 3598:Mus Musculus 3594:this article 3570:Mus Musculus 3563: 3529: 3507: 3476: 3447: 3446: 3442: 3426:User:Raul654 3413: 3397: 3394: 3384: 3381: 3354: 3352: 3348: 3338: 3305: 3299:MartinBotIII 3285: 3284: 3280: 3244: 3233: 3224: 3219: 3178: 3173: 3132: 3127: 3086: 3081: 3040: 2992: 2987: 2946: 2941: 2900: 2895: 2854: 2806: 2758: 2704: 2686: 2531: 2508: 2504:Talk:A Novel 2502:- Logged as 2493:- Logged as 2484:- Logged as 2475:- Logged as 2466:- Logged as 2458: 2404: 2398:- Logged as 2389:- Logged as 2380:- Logged as 2371:- Logged as 2360: 2313: 2291: 2283: 2280: 2249: 2198: 2113: 2100: 2097: 2094:AWB Approval 2083: 1871: 1849: 1806: 1783: 1757: 1756: 1752: 1730: 1729: 1721: 1695: 1694: 1690: 1673:. Thanks! — 1668: 1644: 1620: 1615: 1612: 1552: 1515: 1512:took a break 1511: 1507: 1503: 1496: 1483: 1466: 1462: 1446: 1444: 1440: 1412: 1409: 1386: 1384: 1373: 1370: 1367: 1346: 1322: 1283: 1261: 1250: 1246: 1234: 1195: 1192:Double check 1152: 1139: 1102: 1099: 1074: 1061:Orderinchaos 1054: 1021: 993: 907: 885: 855: 824: 817: 763: 733: 729: 703: 642: 640: 610: 589: 585: 574: 562: 558: 533: 508: 504: 501:Re: Barnstar 478: 407: 404:Bot approval 373: 372: 368: 361: 332:We now have 284: 222: 164: 116:Why did you 115: 107: 81: 49: 43: 3416:andreasegde 3258:Kevinalewis 2652:Kevinalewis 2628:Kevinalewis 2599:Kevinalewis 2512:Kevinalewis 2439:Kevinalewis 2408:Kevinalewis 2030:Adam Morris 1378:Kim Bruning 1340:Kim Bruning 1305:Kim Bruning 1286:Kim Bruning 1269:Wickethewok 1237:Wickethewok 1077:andreasegde 908:interesting 519:Thanks! :) 493:WesleyDodds 485:peer review 118:re-redirect 42:This is an 3968:April 2007 3959:Grafikbot? 3854:Mine's an 3834:Carcharoth 3657:Jimmi Hugh 3636:Jimmi Hugh 3542:. Thanks! 3409:Mimi Smith 3322:Dear Steve 2326:Carcharoth 2119:. Thanks! 1616:Cbrown1023 1484:User EX-WP 1096:AWB access 1070:Mimi Smith 1040:Carcharoth 1012:Carcharoth 940:Carcharoth 912:Carcharoth 873:Carcharoth 805:Carcharoth 792:Carcharoth 779:Carcharoth 521:M3tal H3ad 101:Archive 25 93:Archive 20 88:Archive 19 82:Archive 18 76:Archive 17 71:Archive 16 66:Archive 15 3990:WP:BOTREQ 3906:WPBeatles 3530:It seems 2697:Logging: 2316:the stats 2310:Bio stats 1655:Kleinzach 1280:Thebainer 1251:Chill Out 1168:Sandpiper 1143:Sandpiper 1000:Jan Smuts 801:this edit 749:Recived. 536:GuyWeknow 4031:kingboyk 4011:kingboyk 3998:kingboyk 3945:kingboyk 3913:kingboyk 3873:kingboyk 3845:kingboyk 3815:kingboyk 3779:kingboyk 3744:kingboyk 3731:xaosflux 3712:kingboyk 3670:kingboyk 3647:kingboyk 3612:kingboyk 3585:kingboyk 3493:kingboyk 3461:kingboyk 3430:kingboyk 3400:kingboyk 3313:kingboyk 3309:contribs 3277:Film bio 3247:kingboyk 3235:16 April 3033:Novels: 2847:Novels: 2799:Novels: 2751:Novels: 2706:16 April 2689:kingboyk 2671:kingboyk 2618:kingboyk 2588:kingboyk 2579:kingboyk 2536:kingboyk 2532:log file 2343:kingboyk 2334:contribs 2322:unsigned 2294:WP:ALBUM 2268:contribs 2229:kingboyk 2215:contribs 2181:kingboyk 2151:kingboyk 2086:kingboyk 2034:kingboyk 2006:kingboyk 1975:kingboyk 1953:kingboyk 1921:kingboyk 1889:kingboyk 1857:xaosflux 1831:kingboyk 1811:kingboyk 1807:one line 1798:kingboyk 1787:cgilbert 1771:kingboyk 1745:kingboyk 1714:kingboyk 1676:xaosflux 1664:WP:RFBOT 1632:kingboyk 1598:kingboyk 1589:Jayden54 1574:kingboyk 1563:Jayden54 1530:kingboyk 1475:kingboyk 1461:I'm not 1432:kingboyk 1359:kingboyk 1327:kingboyk 1314:kingboyk 1296:kingboyk 1255:kingboyk 1220:kingboyk 1177:kingboyk 1157:kingboyk 1127:kingboyk 1087:kingboyk 1031:kingboyk 961:think.-- 953:kingboyk 928:kingboyk 894:kingboyk 860:kingboyk 738:kingboyk 732:and not 687:contribs 624:kingboyk 602:kingboyk 546:kingboyk 444:kingboyk 395:kingboyk 325:kingboyk 302:kingboyk 257:kingboyk 235:kingboyk 210:kingboyk 198:kingboyk 167:Picaroon 155:Picaroon 143:kingboyk 133:Picaroon 3935:Mattnad 3824:Support 3720:Cydebot 3383:Do you 3200:history 3196:article 3154:history 3150:article 3108:history 3104:article 3062:history 3058:article 3014:history 3010:article 2968:history 2964:article 2922:history 2918:article 2876:history 2872:article 2828:history 2824:article 2780:history 2776:article 2732:history 2728:article 2558:history 2554:article 2259:SatyrTN 2206:SatyrTN 2102:Chico75 2052:Adamiow 2043:Adamiow 2016:Adamiow 2001:WP:CITE 1988:Adamiow 1962:Adamiow 1940:Adamiow 1899:Adamiow 1878:Adamiow 1846:BOT Req 1687:Tagging 1508:retired 1499:at the 1441:protect 1230:The Orb 1204:Georgia 903:Beatles 734:editors 723:unblock 678:SatyrTN 570:WP:Bold 336:etc. - 266:Lugnuts 244:Lugnuts 225:Lugnuts 45:archive 3761:Signed 3666:WP:DRV 3267:(Desk) 2661:(Desk) 2637:(Desk) 2608:(Desk) 2521:(Desk) 2448:(Desk) 2417:(Desk) 1936:WP:BIO 1913:WP:BIO 1609:E-mail 1520:Riva72 1488:Riva72 1454:Riva72 1418:Riva72 1022:unless 886:expert 831:is in 706:andrea 566:WP:IAR 342:(talk) 315:(talk) 291:(talk) 219:Zapple 3797:Voice 3483:Gurch 3208:watch 3204:links 3162:watch 3158:links 3116:watch 3112:links 3070:watch 3066:links 3037:added 3022:watch 3018:links 2976:watch 2972:links 2930:watch 2926:links 2884:watch 2880:links 2851:added 2836:watch 2832:links 2803:added 2788:watch 2784:links 2755:added 2740:watch 2736:links 2566:watch 2562:links 2026:WP:AN 1997:WP:RS 1909:WP:RS 1471:WP:AN 1374:seven 1371:eight 1202:Sandy 949:asked 730:edits 611:after 487:for " 16:< 3966:The 3830:here 3800:-of- 3602:talk 3574:talk 3470:Re: 3385:ever 3303:talk 3238:2007 3212:logs 3192:edit 3166:logs 3146:edit 3120:logs 3100:edit 3074:logs 3054:edit 3026:logs 3006:edit 2980:logs 2960:edit 2934:logs 2914:edit 2888:logs 2868:edit 2840:logs 2820:edit 2792:logs 2772:edit 2744:logs 2724:edit 2709:2007 2570:logs 2550:edit 2330:talk 2302:Alai 2298:here 2264:talk 2211:talk 2143:here 2139:here 1919:. -- 1821:Bbik 1621:talk 1504:left 1368:nine 1357:. -- 1262:must 1209:Talk 1057:here 1029:. -- 938:... 936:oops 856:must 839:and 818:only 736:. -- 683:talk 568:and 530:Tags 462:talk 431:talk 418:here 416:and 414:here 186:talk 151:This 4022:RHB 3973:RHB 3856:ESB 3803:All 3788:BAG 3548:rab 3514:rab 2164:rab 2125:rab 1510:or 1463:the 1387:cat 1323:why 921:KLF 655:or 458:501 456:ETS 427:501 425:ETS 182:501 180:ETS 123:to 3909:}} 3903:{{ 3890:}} 3884:{{ 3681:. 3634:-- 3604:) 3576:) 3552:ee 3544:Er 3518:ee 3510:Er 3261:: 3245:-- 3210:| 3206:| 3202:| 3198:| 3194:| 3164:| 3160:| 3156:| 3152:| 3148:| 3118:| 3114:| 3110:| 3106:| 3102:| 3072:| 3068:| 3064:| 3060:| 3056:| 3024:| 3020:| 3016:| 3012:| 3008:| 2978:| 2974:| 2970:| 2966:| 2962:| 2932:| 2928:| 2924:| 2920:| 2916:| 2886:| 2882:| 2878:| 2874:| 2870:| 2838:| 2834:| 2830:| 2826:| 2822:| 2790:| 2786:| 2782:| 2778:| 2774:| 2742:| 2738:| 2734:| 2730:| 2726:| 2655:: 2631:: 2602:: 2568:| 2564:| 2560:| 2556:| 2552:| 2515:: 2442:: 2411:: 2336:). 2332:• 2266:| 2227:-- 2213:| 2168:ee 2160:Er 2129:ee 2121:Er 2004:-- 1743:-- 1572:-- 1528:-- 1518:-- 1467:an 1452:-- 1416:-- 1389:? 1247:me 1211:) 1115:st 1105:Bl 1059:. 910:! 726:}} 720:{{ 685:| 673:}} 667:{{ 663:}} 657:{{ 653:}} 647:{{ 643:my 442:-- 208:-- 196:-- 153:. 131:. 97:→ 3769:. 3759:— 3600:( 3572:( 3372:l 3370:e 3368:i 3366:r 3364:d 3362:e 3360:a 3358:h 3356:P 3306:· 3301:( 3264:/ 3214:) 3190:( 3168:) 3144:( 3122:) 3098:( 3076:) 3052:( 3028:) 3004:( 2982:) 2958:( 2936:) 2912:( 2890:) 2866:( 2842:) 2818:( 2794:) 2770:( 2746:) 2722:( 2658:/ 2634:/ 2605:/ 2572:) 2548:( 2518:/ 2445:/ 2414:/ 2328:( 2270:) 2262:( 2217:) 2209:( 1207:( 1110:a 843:. 753:. 689:) 681:( 464:) 460:( 454:M 433:) 429:( 423:M 188:) 184:( 178:M 121:៛ 56:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index