287:
161:
I stated no reason given since you did not provide a reason that justified keeping the article. If an article is nominated for a speedy deletion for a valid reason, then there is no need to use AfD. In fact, speedy deletion is on of the tools usede to keep the number of articles discussed in AfD to
272:
are not relevant to an article about the CNAD. How in the world does finding a link to the organization constitute "original research" when I found it the same way all the other information in that article was found--by looking on the Web? I won't re-correct it to add the link and reference back
44:
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on
Knowledge (XXG) is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Knowledge (XXG) are
273:
in, but I think you've got a rather idiotic double-standard here. (Whether you personally invented it is irrelevant: Where does finding stuff on the Web end and "original research" begin? No wonder so many people think
Knowledge (XXG)'s a substandard source.) -
468:
68:
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from
482:
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about
Knowledge (XXG) and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.
162:
a reasonable number. Any administrator can delete any article, but that action is always subject to some form of consensus review. When you reposted this article, the consensus review became the discussion on AfD.
371:
138:
Speedy deletion is a policy that allows well defined types of articles to be removed without discussion. The reasons that are acceptable have been voted on with a consensus of editors supporting those reasons.
210:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "
214:"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
185:
12:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC) Commoners think BoR are 1st 10 because elementary sch teachers tell me so, but they are not lawyers who have to sue the guvmint to protect indiv rts. :(
365:
152:
guidelines. So, in my opinion, you were given a chance to justify keeping of the article and I believed that what you wrote still justified the speedy deletion.
299:
215:
429:
related to slogans used by two leading
Australian TV stations. The articles need refs and citations etc but I think they can be fixed. They are:
106:
Hi there, if you ever have any questions on
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies, I'd be happy to help. Just drop me a note on my talk page. Cheers. --
70:
58:
269:
148:
I did read your reasons for not deleting on the talk page. Nothing that you wrote there provided any assertion of meeting the
386:
316:
244:
353:
207:
222:
with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
438:
433:
347:
25:. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The
324:
306:
policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure
343:
250:
I don't understand your logic. You didn't want the article to stay, either, but you removed the prod? Use
38:
393:
311:
254:
in the future if you support an article's deletion, but for another reason other than the one given. -
83:
Image provided by school for use on entry, and I'll work to get written permission to re-upload it. --
234:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it.
26:
307:
379:
226:
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.
449:
113:
108:
74:
314:. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
407:
359:
235:
186:
182:
163:
153:
140:
129:
303:
291:
231:
223:
219:
211:
149:
125:
334:
445:
425:, and thought that you might support a couple of articules have just been put up for
274:
255:
50:
34:
22:
403:
46:
181:
Notice that the specfic rights you mention only come from the first 8, not 10. ;)
30:
467:
320:
article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the
85:
54:
286:
203:
196:
277:
and however the heck you do timestamps... yeah, I'm still a n00b...
453:
411:
258:
238:
189:
166:
156:
143:
132:
119:
95:
77:
90:
84:
206:, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for
426:
422:
124:
As I said on the talk page, you really need to look at
378:
290:
Hello Kigoe! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
392:
298:of the articles that you created is tagged as an
268:I'm not sure why listing affiliations for the
216:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Quizlet
29:is very careful about the images included in
8:
17:Image copyright problem with Image:Hill.png
61:and place it on the image page like this:
465:
300:Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person
71:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Image copyright tags
230:This is an automatic notification by a
421:Hi, I noticed your vote on a similar
310:, all biographies should be based on
7:
59:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags
57:. Find the appropriate template in
14:
466:
285:
270:Center for a New American Dream
128:and understand that criteria.
245:List of unboundedly long songs
1:
304:biographies of living persons
259:01:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
239:15:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
439:List of Nine Network slogans
78:18:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
434:List of Network Ten slogans
412:19:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
212:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
500:
330:tag. Here is the article:
472:
454:06:48, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
167:02:54, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
157:02:44, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
144:02:33, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
133:02:17, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
120:01:25, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
96:22:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
202:An editor has nominated
190:12:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
37:(see Knowledge (XXG)'s
218:and please be sure to
476:The Original Barnstar
224:articles for deletion
21:Thanks for uploading
27:Wikimedia Foundation
417:Slogans or bylines
294:alerting you that
220:sign your comments
195:AfD nomination of
487:
486:
398:
281:Unreferenced BLPs
252:{{prod-2|reason}}
102:Re: Michael Kight
491:
470:
463:
462:
397:
396:
382:
338:
329:
323:
312:reliable sources
289:
116:
111:
94:
88:
64:
63:{{TemplateName}}
39:Copyright policy
499:
498:
494:
493:
492:
490:
489:
488:
461:
419:
339:
335:N. Douglas Hunt
327:
325:unreferencedBLP
321:
283:
266:
248:
200:
179:
114:
109:
104:
62:
31:Knowledge (XXG)
19:
12:
11:
5:
497:
495:
485:
484:
479:
478:
473:
471:
460:
457:
442:
441:
436:
418:
415:
400:
399:
282:
279:
265:
262:
247:
242:
199:
193:
178:
175:
174:
173:
172:
171:
170:
169:
103:
100:
99:
98:
23:Image:Hill.png
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
496:
481:
480:
477:
474:
469:
464:
458:
456:
455:
451:
447:
440:
437:
435:
432:
431:
430:
428:
424:
416:
414:
413:
409:
405:
395:
391:
388:
385:
381:
377:
373:
370:
367:
364:
361:
358:
355:
352:
349:
345:
342:
341:Find sources:
336:
333:
332:
331:
326:
319:
318:
313:
309:
308:verifiability
305:
301:
297:
293:
288:
280:
278:
276:
271:
263:
261:
260:
257:
253:
246:
243:
241:
240:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
198:
194:
192:
191:
188:
184:
176:
168:
165:
160:
159:
158:
155:
151:
147:
146:
145:
142:
137:
136:
135:
134:
131:
127:
122:
121:
118:
117:
112:
101:
97:
93:
87:
82:
81:
80:
79:
76:
72:
66:
60:
56:
52:
51:public domain
48:
42:
40:
36:
35:copyright law
32:
28:
24:
16:
475:
443:
420:
401:
389:
383:
375:
368:
362:
356:
350:
340:
315:
295:
284:
267:
264:CNAD article
251:
249:
228:Please note:
227:
201:
180:
123:
107:
105:
91:
67:
47:open content
43:
20:
366:free images
236:Jayden54Bot
187:John wesley
183:John wesley
164:Vegaswikian
154:Vegaswikian
141:Vegaswikian
130:Vegaswikian
33:because of
402:Thanks!--
459:Barnstar
444:Thanks.
275:Dseilhan
256:Chardish
208:deletion
115:darkness
75:Carnildo
55:fair use
404:DASHBot
372:WP refs
360:scholar
204:Quizlet
197:Quizlet
177:B o Rts
344:Google
302:. The
150:WP:BIO
126:WP:BIO
53:, and
387:JSTOR
348:books
110:light
86:KiGOE
73:. --
450:talk
446:AWHS
408:talk
380:FENS
354:news
92:talk
427:AfD
423:AfD
394:TWL
317:688
292:bot
232:bot
41:).
452:)
410:)
374:)
337:-
328:}}
322:{{
89:|
65:.
49:,
448:(
406:(
390:·
384:·
376:·
369:·
363:·
357:·
351:·
346:(
296:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.