115:
344:. I only came back to the article because I was going through the non-Cabinet people on the list. Did you fix that list, once you realized this was a former MP? No, you did not. That would have been "work", requiring "thought" and "effort". Same as you mis-corrected the hat note on the other John Carter MP. Based on your arrogance, I thought it likely you were an Admin. What a surprise, I was right. And Jimbo wonders why the numbers of actual contributors are going straight downhill. I have
357:. Go lecture someone else, because I'm out of here, and you can be sure I won't be encouraging anyone else to participate in what could have been a good project. Your attitude is horrendous, and I'm sure I'm not the first one you've chased out of here. Well, keep it up and you'll soon have the whole thing to yourself. Enjoy. Go brag to your friends that you got rid of another contributor. I'm sure you're very proud of yourself.
298:
Cam Calder. I removed it with the edit summary "Cannot replace it because Carter is no longer an mp". You have responded by inserting a brand new link to Former MPs. I was unaware Carter has been added to that list, but that is beside the point because I was removing links to current MPs. If you intend to edit
Knowledge for a while I suggest you don't shout in your edit summaries as you did with
297:
you added a link to the current MPs list, for Carter. Problem was it was for David Carter, not John Carter so I removed it. I went to replace it with one for John Carter, but there is none, so I couldn't. You then added another link, but like the first one it too went to the wrong person, this time,
188:
I'm sorry that you're going to give up over your first—and relatively minor, in the grand scheme of things, as I've seen and been involved with lots worse—disagreement over an article. Editing on
Knowledge isn't always wine and roses. There are times when editors disagree; usually the best result is
339:
I was adding the links, unknown to me, so it seems the
Parliament link was being moved from current to former which caused pointer problems when I clicked on it. Things happen. It only needed to be fixed. I would have thought an Admin would be capable of figuring that out. Nor could you figure out
226:
Hi there, I'd like to welcome you to
Knowledge. Your user name and edits would suggest that you work at parliament. If that's so, would you possibly be in a position and release photos of MPs with a licence suitable for Knowledge? If you can help, we can discuss how to go about this. You can reply
277:
If you weren't so eager to smash things rather than fix them, you would have noticed that. And you couldn't even be bothered to let me know there might be a problem. I hope our paths never cross again but I suppose I'll have to watch your contributions in future to make sure you aren't deleting
135:
because is the name of an organization and creates the appearance that you are editing on behalf of the organization. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a
352:
at all welcoming, helpful, polite, assuming good faith, or anything else I was led to believe is part of the
Knowledge ethos. So I leave you to it. You didn't even have the grace to apologize for deleting the other links, you just tried to blame me in this
278:
everything I do. What a waste of time. Oh yeah - I'll assume you were smashing in good faith. As if. Thanks for ruining my (formerly) good mood, as I was enjoying making some useful contributions to
Knowledge articles.
250:
I'm sorry that you have taken so personally the removal of links by
Moriori, and you are welcome to leave Knowledge if you cannot collaborate on articles. However, the postings you have made at
374:
That is undoubtedly a personal attack. Since you appear unable to contribute further to
Knowledge, I am blocking you until you are willing to agree to work productively and collaboratively.-
335:
are the one who jumped to conclusions. Now you're trying to claim you only deleted the one that was a problem. Even your edit summary is wrong. The man's resignation was presented
196:
I hope that after you've had a chance to relax a little, you do come back to
Knowledge. When you do, if I can be of any assistance to you, don't hesitate to leave a message on
189:
to talk it out on the article's talk page. That way, a consensus of involved editors can be determined through the discussion. (And for the record, I support your edit to the
119:
331:
is the recap. The two other links worked fine, but you deleted them as well in your hurry to smash everything someone else did. In other words,
124:
26:
47:
348:
intention of continuing to contribute to
Knowledge because you obviously would prefer to do everything yourself. You're
52:
137:
190:
132:
62:
56:
162:
33:
22:
77:
69:
158:
73:
234:
85:
38:
29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
227:
here, as I'm watching your page. And thanks for tidying up all the external links — great work.
84:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
375:
307:
259:
251:
207:
197:
147:
99:
340:
how to leave a message on my Talk page so I could figure it out. You just couldn't wait to
229:
255:
258:. Please either contribute collaboratively to the encyclopedia or leave peacefully.-
358:
303:
279:
175:
43:
300:"Former MPs DO HAVE WORKING LINKS. Wikipedians fix links rather than delete them"
202:
142:
94:
88:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place
140:, or you may simply create a new account to use for editing. Thank you. —
171:
Not that it matters, because thanks to Moriori's miserable attitude,
380:
366:
311:
287:
264:
240:
211:
183:
166:
151:
103:
302:, and you address the actual issue and don't jump to conclusions.
81:
294:
275:Former MPs do have working links in Parliament.
8:
68:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
293:Welcome to Knowledge. Now, a recap. With
127:. However, I noticed that your username
92:before the question. Again, welcome! —
7:
193:article; the link looks fine to me.)
14:
113:
53:How to create your first article
270:jftr, what the above refers to
1:
34:The five pillars of Knowledge
25:to Knowledge! Thank you for
327:the links I added for him.
157:thx - I requested Kiwigov.
396:
381:02:22, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
367:06:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
312:02:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
288:01:03, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
265:21:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
241:23:04, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
212:14:16, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
184:06:42, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
167:00:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
152:18:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
104:18:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
191:John Carter (New Zealand)
131:may not meet Knowledge's
21:Hello, NZparliament, and
179:
48:How to develop articles
254:violate our policy on
323:was that you deleted
120:Welcome to Knowledge
86:Knowledge:Questions
138:change of username
125:your contributions
123:and thank you for
44:How to edit a page
27:your contributions
252:user talk:Moriori
109:Username concerns
76:your messages on
387:
378:
342:smash everything
262:
256:personal attacks
246:Personal attacks
237:
232:
117:
116:
91:
78:discussion pages
395:
394:
390:
389:
388:
386:
385:
384:
376:
272:
260:
248:
235:
230:
224:
133:username policy
114:
111:
89:
63:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
393:
391:
372:
371:
370:
369:
271:
268:
247:
244:
223:
220:
219:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
194:
129:(NZparliament)
110:
107:
66:
65:
60:
57:Article Wizard
50:
41:
36:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
392:
383:
382:
379:
368:
364:
360:
356:
351:
347:
343:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
315:
314:
313:
309:
305:
301:
296:
292:
291:
290:
289:
285:
281:
276:
269:
267:
266:
263:
257:
253:
245:
243:
242:
239:
238:
233:
221:
213:
209:
205:
204:
199:
195:
192:
187:
186:
185:
181:
177:
174:
170:
169:
168:
164:
160:
156:
155:
154:
153:
149:
145:
144:
139:
134:
130:
126:
122:
121:
108:
106:
105:
101:
97:
96:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
64:
61:
58:
54:
51:
49:
45:
42:
40:
37:
35:
32:
31:
30:
28:
24:
19:
18:
373:
362:
354:
349:
345:
341:
337:the same day
336:
332:
328:
324:
321:actual issue
320:
316:
299:
283:
274:
273:
249:
228:
225:
201:
198:my talk page
172:
159:NZparliament
141:
128:
118:
112:
93:
67:
59:if you wish)
20:
16:
15:
355:audit trail
90:{{help me}}
80:using four
55:(using the
70:Wikipedian
317:Not true!
295:this edit
72:! Please
39:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
377:gadfium
359:Kiwigov
304:Moriori
280:Kiwigov
261:gadfium
231:Schwede
222:Welcome
176:Kiwigov
173:I QUIT.
23:welcome
203:C.Fred
143:C.Fred
95:C.Fred
82:tildes
363:talk
329:That
319:The
308:talk
284:talk
208:talk
180:talk
163:talk
148:talk
100:talk
74:sign
46:and
350:not
333:you
325:ALL
200:. —
365:)
346:NO
310:)
286:)
236:66
210:)
182:)
165:)
150:)
102:)
361:(
306:(
282:(
206:(
178:(
161:(
146:(
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.