Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Kzollman/Archive1

Source đź“ť

1445:
Furthermore, I have read your spam page on the guidelines of posting links, and I feel that due to the fact that my link points to relevant information and has non-promotional language, I should be allowed to post my link. Many people are thankful that I have created iHomeConnect as way of helping people find housing. When people like you remove quality links like mine, you are restricting the exchange of information and taking the power out of the hands of the people and giving more power to corporate entities. Please stop removing my link, or I will seek legal action against those who continue to deprive Knowledge (XXG) users of relevant information by removing my contributions.
1337:
hey Kevin, well it is quite a funky sig! I've only relatively recently started changing mine, but since then it's been through a fair few incarnations. I'd stored some useful characters (such as â””) from other people's sigs, as possibly useful for the future, so perhaps I had seen yours previously and
1167:
Sure I'd like to be kept updated. How have you solved the copyright issues? I and my teammeate have been running in circles trying to get a clear answer if we can order the students to sumbit their work on Wiki (under GDFL, obviously - thus forfeiting some copyrights). If you want, I can send you our
220:
I could start it off etc, you could just add your bit to the subsection of gametheory, but I wouldnt really know what other issues to deal with, I havent been too busy in the economics section recently, I guess things like categorisation and expanding all those stubs need to be dealt with. How do you
1541:
has a row labelled "References". That link points to the page containing the references (and external links) I used. I didn't see the point of listing the same dozen or so references on all 1600+ crater pages. Is that not satisfactory? If not then I guess I'll have to build a reference template for
427:
Well, I'm mainly a functional analyst/quantum information theorist, but I do have a strong interest in mathematical economics and did have at one point an interest in getting some mathematically accurate pages on fixed point theory/convexity theory etc, although that subsided somewhat since my wiki
161:
Hi, I readily acknowledge my ignorance of the subject and accept direction you wish to give me. A number of articles are categorized in both "Economics" and "Game theory", but a number of other articles are just in "Game theory." Do you know whether it would make sense for me to take those that are
1444:
I have a complaint to make. I've submitted several relevant links for UCI students. One, being UCI Housing and the other Off-Campus Housing (presently removed) which points to a community website that is completely free and has been mentioned by CSUF's newspaper as a great resource for students.
531:
Thanks for joining the project. Can you verify that the subcategories in the philosophy list are suitable? I would like to make sure that no important sub field was left out and that there are no unrelated entries. I assume that it should ok after all the work done there but it worth checking. Do
319:
Looks like a good idea. I'm tempted to volunteer (there are a few game theory pages I wish I had time to have a go at) but I expect to be pretty heavily time-invested in other areas over the next month or so. Good intentions, bad habits. I have a grad student who is starting up on a game theory
1049:
FYI, judgment-proof is a slang term used among lawyers for a defendant with no substantial financial assets (for example, a typical welfare recipient who lives in public housing and takes the bus and only owns a few bits of used furniture and clothes). Therefore, that person cannot be rationally
455:
Well, admittedly I don't know anything about him that wasn't in the New York Times obituary. I keep intending to write an article on the fixed-point theorem, which I saw as part of the formal proof for the existance of the Nash equilibria. Every time I sit down to write it, I end up sidetracked
717:
I will definately get around the new game theory article within the next 24 hours. As for the rfa, to get an idea of what people are looking for then just check out the current and past nominations. I definately think you would pass easily, in fact I will happily nominate you myself if you would
170:
Maurreen - Good you noticed that! I think probably the appropriate action would just be to remove the economics category from those pages and leave the game theory one. The reason I'm worried is that game theory is highly interdisciplinary (involving sociology, economics, biology, political
1606:
Sorry, I meant that I don't think anon IPs (or anyone else) would be dissuaded from making useful contributions by the template. This would be evidence against the 'ownership' argument I hear that suggests that the template acts as some sort of territorial urine tag which will act to dissuade
1596:
Hey Kevin, I was just admiring the most recent anon edits to Game theory, and thought it might be time to take a first peek to compare the number of constructive/non-constructive anon/non-anon edits to articles, Counting from the time since they had maintained templates put on them, versus the
1061:
In case you're wondering why injunctions and contempt wouldn't work as an alternative (a classic question in Remedies classes) it's because no court will issue a general order to obey the law (since that is presumed to be required of all members of society anyway). Injunctions (and the use of
1099:
I made it indefinite because she has been trolling for months. I know I've blocked her at least once before; it doesn't seem to show up in the logs, so it must have been before the MediaWiki upgrade which created the new log (i.e. in late 2004). Incidentally, she's banned on Meta as well. —
1314:
Hi there. As it turns out I independently created an identical sig to your's. I don't think I've ever seen your sig before, but perhaps it stayed around in my memory and I was pushed toward it. Or perhaps two great minds think alike. Anyway, I'll change mine soon to avoid
632:
The dab option on popups works great! And it will attempt to repair multiple links per page--just have to double check each one in the preview. With the tool, I get to spend more time double checking the apropriateness of the re-direct than typing. Very very useful!!
1062:
contempt citations and jail time to enforce them) are usually granted only when it is explicitly clear that the defendant will commit a particular tort in the near future unless stopped (such as abusing one's spouse or children for the fourth or fifth time in a week).
477:
I blanked it as a result of a direct request from whoever owns Knowledge (XXG). Didn't you see my notice? And even if you don't believe me - I didn't "blank" the page, per se, there was still content on it... JIMBO WALES! That's it! He told me to! Yes, that's right!
189:. I don't know if you can acquire the 5-10 wikipedians recommended. Also, I have little time at the moment to spare for Knowledge (XXG) and my contributions tend to be infrequent flurries of activity rather than steady flows. Nonetheless, I'm certainly interested. 672:
Sorry I haven't helped more on the project, but unfortunately I dont have any of my textbooks anymore and I dont trust my memory! So I cant really input that much. Did you ever get round to standardising the payoff matrix tables like you planned to before? thanks
1377:
lol Yeah, I'm his grad student - he asked me to come and do the edit for ESS as we've been mulling over Thomas's paper and ES Sets for a few days now. I'll probably be seeing you around here a bit. But thanks for the invite anyways; made me feel welcome.  :-)
1121:
Hey Kevin, go ahead and crop the figs any way you want. They could be greatly improved, thicker dotted lines etc. They're grabs from a book I started writing (before I came to my senses and abandoned it) and not really optimal for the web... Cheers,
960:
Congratulations. Don't worry about your eyes, just don't go nominating me for such a thing. I don't need the temptation. Keep up the good work, don't neglect your own research. I look forward to the normative signalling paper. Rock on,
1672:
Hi Kevin, thanks very much for the welcome message. I'm hoping to have a crack at the Prisoner's Dilemma article as soon as I get some time, to add some information about evolutionary models, tag-based cooperation and spatial models.
1533:. I've been doing the ol' random page browsing and I stumbled on it. You don't happen to remember your references for it, do you? If you do, it would be great if you could add them. Thanks! --best, kevin 18:22, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 751:. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. 1499:
First point - please don't leave me form comments on my talk page. I am not a new user, and it's a bit patronizing. Second point, the list of Secretaries of State for Commonwealth Relations comes straight from the FCO website -
1481:
please? The article seems to be OK, but I cannot find a single reference to it anywhere, either Google, or any of the several online literature searches our library provides. I have half a mind to VfD it, but what do you think?
1028:
page is really vague about when it's appropriate to tag someone as a suspected sockpuppet, I'm not willing to do it on gut feeling alone. It's small potatoes, not worth waking up the grown-ups at WP:ANI over either... Cheers,
171:
science, and philosophy) and so I wouldn't want to mislead people by making a special category "economics game theory". Thanks for your quick response, and I'll try to keep my eye out for those duplicate categories! best, --
184:
You could certainly count me in. I have created and contributed to many game theory articles - it's probably the area to which I have contributed the most. I don't know anybody else who would be interested, except perhaps
1513:
It's okay, I seem to feel patronized fairly frequently. Glad to be able to provide the citation - that one turned out to be an easy one. There's some articles I've done where it would be harder to find the citation.
1075:
Actually, I prefer that you not use the above text for an article, because (1) it reflects my own personal bias too much and (2) there are a lot of subtle issues that I left out. Also, in case you're unaware, the
1338:
not recalled. I had a brief look through your contributions and can't see any articles which I have also made contributions to, though! Anyhow, not to worry, mine will get changed before long, I'm sure. Cheers,
1298:
On the Project Announcements secion you just put up "Game theory is not up for Featured article status" is the "not" a typo for "now", or an I just thinking you made some sort of a Freudian slip and you didn't?
586:
Thanks for fixing up my entry. I'm new to Knowledge (XXG) so any help is very appreciated! I applied your change to Long Beach to fix the Santa Ana link as well. Looks like we attend the same school too.
840:
at your convenience. Most sysop actions are reversible, the exceptions being history merges and deleting pages (but it's a good idea to be careful with all of them). Again, congrats on becoming an admin.
1235:
In this case, I'll be relisting the article on AfD again for another 7 days. It seems other sysops that 2 votes are not sufficient as concensus these days, so just to stay on the safe side.
1363:
Holy shit, that's a belly laugh at the end of a mediocre day! I'm very curious. Please let me know what happens, if that's possible. If there's any way I can help, just let me know.
697: 1660:
Can you monitor both articles ? I'll find the two Users who may start one by accident. Told them that this is a encyclopedia, NOT a means to prove or disprove that aliens are around.
1054:, since the person literally has nothing to lose but his liberty, and that can be taken away only when the state proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant has committed a 222: 1283:
I saw how bad was the backlog, I will help you guys out. Please do not start sending copyvios to VfD to have them settled, I believe we can have WP:CP cleaned up by itself. :) -
518:
Since you contributed in the past to the publications’ lists, I thought that you might be interested in this new project. I’ll be glad if you will continue contributing. Thanks,
446:! On a more general note, I'm not an expert but I'll help where I can. I took several game theory courses, and I own some relevant textbooks including Fudenberg and Tirole. 338:(that is, infinite games). There are certainly some points of commonality with the more practically-oriented game theory used by economists, but I wonder if they're enough. 352:
Try to to deal with both sorts of games in a common framework. This has the advantage of avoiding duplication of articles. But I think there could be some awkwardness too.
199:
Yes a game theory project would be nice, possibly a better idea may be to make an Economics wikiproject which encapsulates game theory (which we amazingly dont have in the
1187:
Kevin! Just when I was starting to think the world had gone mad! yes, I will only proceed with that issue when I have come to a conclusion with Noisy. thanks a lot!
1597:
equivalent time before the templates... It's probably too early for the data to be convincing, but my gut feeling is that there's no dissuasion effect. -Cheers,
145:
reading through it a little too fast, and I could not comprehend it at that speed. Therefore, now, after I looked it over i saw where I erred. Thank you for your
268: 110: 1157:
at the University of Pittburgh (unfortunately, my project was delayed a term). If you need any help, or just want to brainstorm some ideas, drop me a line. --
658:
Thanks for the barnstar. Unfortunately, it is not over yet. Alford (DotSix) returned about a week ago. Please see the section He's Baaaack on my talk page. --
1552:
I've built a template that I'll start using, which should address all these issues. It'll take me a few weeks to finish adding it to all the crater pages. —
1254: 755: 1154: 1147: 837: 833: 1169: 320:
thesis project next month. I was considering assigning him some pages to get him up to speed, but I'm not convinced this is the best thing to do.
509: 1626:
I am way out of date on this fast-moving commercial field but have done my best to add some more detailed material and some reference material.
601:
Hey, Kevin! I was wondering how you use Lupin's popup tool for disambiguation? I just started using it to preview links which is very cool. -
1501: 748: 45: 104: 1425: 92: 1461: 740: 272: 243: 96: 68: 64: 934: 494:
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. I really appreciate it. If I can help you with anything, please let me know.
200: 1168:
brochure on this (not yet ready, but has some useful info). I am also working on a workshop (presentation) introducing people to
951:
Congratulations, and I become only more impressed by your conscientiousness that you are thanking everyone who voted for you! ---
246:), standardisation of notation etc. over all economics articles is a great idea. First I've got to sleep, its 1:40am here. thanks 1571:
Kevin, sorry to say, but my source for the above article was also the American soccer history archives, which is already listed.
57: 356: 487: 71:
page etc.) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
777:
article, all I could do was fix a couple of grammatical errors. Maybe we could consider nominating it for featured status?
221:
think Game theory would benefit, just out of interest? One thing i can think of is if we copyed the idea of my other pet;
1417: 162:
in both categories out of the main "Economics" category? I will undo the "Economics game theory" if that's best. Thanks.
1477:
Hi kzollman. Thanks for your comments. I'll dig out the ref and source it. And while I'm writing, could you check out
902:
Hey it was a pleasure voting for such a fine candidate. Congratulations, hope to see you doing good work for wikipedia!
809:
and has agreed to come by and visit with the San Diego wikipedians. If you are interested, you will find more info on
88: 854:
I may not know you too well, though I'm sure I'll get to know you, but anyways welcome aboard, and add yourself to
570: 382:
article, and the notion of winning strategy I'm interested in is reproduced there. So you might want to reclaim
118: 33: 971: 566: 1538: 1530: 1457: 401: 1449: 1567:
Let me echo this request for American Soccer League. Thanks! --best, kevin 03:04, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
574: 225:, and got a good economics/game theory encyclopedia/dictionary and make sure we cover everything it does. 146: 937: 910: 864: 82: 75: 1453: 931: 342: 190: 109:
If you made IP edits before creating a user account, you can attribute your IP edits to your account at
490:
I bestow the PSI Award to polite, courteous, and helpful users. It is to be used in good mental health!
363: 100: 53: 1395:? First time I've heard of an equilibrium coarsening... but then there's lots I don't know about... 980: 335: 203:
of projects! ), because a project just for game theory may be a bit specific to gain any popularity.
1478: 875: 744: 366:
article, and point everything from the determinacy stuff there. Probably there should be a dab on
1620: 1572: 1324: 1284: 1271: 1258: 1243: 1105: 129: 17: 829: 150: 1647: 1345: 845: 498: 1008: 1661: 1515: 1505: 1077: 1007:
I've been looking for tools for tracking IPs used by editors (stemming from suspicions that
928: 659: 615:
Thanks for sharing your "secret"  ;-). I am gonna try it out. Let ya' know how it goes!!
457: 383: 367: 359:, and try to avoid getting in each other's way. But would there enough people to work on it? 331: 1085: 1081: 1066: 1001: 704: 532:
you think that we should allow several hierarchies – by are, country, topic, etc? Thanks,
461: 447: 443: 429: 405: 855: 1608: 1598: 1587: 1431: 1396: 1364: 1300: 1210: 1188: 1123: 1030: 1016: 998: 962: 891: 869: 859: 778: 759: 734: 719: 674: 638: 620: 602: 387: 321: 301: 276: 247: 226: 208: 186: 1138: 1101: 172: 163: 125: 1270:
Got it. Thanks for the heads up! I notice the obvious surge in such cases now! :) -
1153:
I'd be very interested in learning how is your project progressing, as I am working
747:
to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at
1627: 1379: 1173: 1158: 842: 814: 588: 495: 419: 1664: 1650: 1630: 1611: 1601: 1590: 1575: 1556: 1546: 1518: 1508: 1489: 1434: 1399: 1382: 1367: 1350: 1329: 1303: 1287: 1274: 1261: 1246: 1221: 1199: 1176: 1161: 1141: 1126: 1108: 1088: 1069: 1033: 1019: 974: 965: 955: 946: 922: 896: 879: 848: 818: 787: 768: 728: 707: 683: 662: 645: 627: 609: 591: 581: 551: 536: 522: 500: 464: 450: 436: 422: 408: 390: 341:
On the other hand there's a lot of work to do on the determinacy-style games (see
324: 304: 279: 250: 229: 211: 193: 38: 117:
I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Knowledge (XXG). Drop a note at
1553: 1543: 1486: 1424: 1413: 1405: 1012: 991: 952: 774: 578: 379: 204: 915: 905: 798: 562: 548: 433: 1640:
I appreciate the welcome and the tip. I was wondering how to sign my name.
135: 828:
It's my pleasure to notify you that, consensus being reached, you're now a
533: 519: 460:, and this time the man himself. I guess third time will be the charm. 1643:
Thanks again, and I hope you have a good...whatever you celebrate.  :)
1148:
Knowledge (XXG):School_and_university_projects#Oregon_State_University
1024:
OK, just wondering if I couldn't find such a tool in user space. The
334:
to this project. I had thought of that article as being mainly about
300:
Yeah thats probably a good idea, count me in on what ever you decide.
886:
No doubt, Red...Kevin is a great addition to the janitorial staff!!
806: 794: 87:
Some other pages that will help you know more about Knowledge (XXG):
1504:. It can be verified from numerous other printed sources, however. 994:
listed, or it's author? A quick look at some of this user's edits
810: 418:
I'm not really an expert, I'm afraid - I've only a casual interest.
1055: 485: 1051: 486: 456:
into writing a different article. First it was his daughter
698:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Ninth Day of Creation
428:
energy was largely sapped by a controversy over an article
997:
makes me wonder if all his substantive edits are hoaxes.
223:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles
1137:
Thanks for your timely help with the MHK and KSU page.
749:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Kzollman/Archive1
1393: 995: 386:
for game theorists. I put a dab notice at the top. --
1420:, and the whole project is coming along very nicely. 1205:
Thank you! Bluebot is very happy now, you have made
700:, one a vote for and the other against. What's up? 805:Hello, Jimbo Wales will be in San Diego to attend 737:would like to nominate you to be an administrator. 48:. Here are some links that you might find useful: 273:Knowledge (XXG):Wikiportal/Business and Economics 1170:Knowledge (XXG):Researching with Knowledge (XXG) 275:, do you think a project would duplicate these? 269:Knowledge (XXG):The Business and Economics Forum 111:Knowledge (XXG):Changing attribution for an edit 44:Hope you enjoy contributing to Knowledge (XXG). 1257:. My apologies for any inconvenience caused. - 756:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/nominate 442:Congratulations, you just inspired me to write 1586:Whups, I'll go read the fine manual! Cheers, 927:Congratulations, and you're quite welcome. -- 343:Talk:Winning_strategy#Organizational_questions 703:Sorry, it's early. Thanks for clarifying ;-) 8: 743:to see what this process entails, and then 105:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not 1669:== can you helis there a Adult Swim page? 696:Kevin, you have two edits in the debate ( 1172:and Knowledge (XXG) as teaching tool. -- 1607:constructive editorial contributions. 400:Thanks for expanding and fixing up the 357:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Determinacy 1542:all the lunar crater pages. Thanks. — 970:Congratulations for the frozen north. 741:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship 1174:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1159:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 244:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Economics 97:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view 7: 1537:The table to the upper right of the 1495:Secretary for Commonwealth Relations 565:links probably should go to either 432:. I'm not sure I'll be much help.-- 58:Knowledge (XXG):How to edit a page 24: 1430:A barnstar for all your efforts. 1015:sockpuppet), do you know of any? 990:Have you ever heard of this book 141:Thank you for your correction. I 1423: 793:Jimbo Wales to Attend San Diego 348:So I see several possibilities: 242:OK, I'll start it off tomorrow ( 1392:Ki Kevin. Have you seen these, 758:for what to do next. good luck 378:I've written (partially) a new 663:22:28, 24 September 2005 (UTC) 646:17:46, 27 September 2005 (UTC) 628:22:16, 24 September 2005 (UTC) 610:06:11, 24 September 2005 (UTC) 592:00:06, 19 September 2005 (UTC) 582:04:09, 18 September 2005 (UTC) 552:09:14, 13 September 2005 (UTC) 537:05:41, 13 September 2005 (UTC) 523:11:21, 11 September 2005 (UTC) 345:), and help would be welcome. 201:economics and business section 157:Category economics game theory 1: 1665:09:08, 25 December 2005 (UTC) 1651:23:45, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1631:09:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC) 1612:18:54, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 1602:16:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 1591:18:37, 18 December 2005 (UTC) 1576:20:06, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 1557:19:00, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 1547:18:46, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 1519:05:18, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 1509:03:11, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 1351:13:44, 30 November 2005 (UTC) 1330:15:57, 28 November 2005 (UTC) 1304:00:25, 28 November 2005 (UTC) 1288:15:55, 20 November 2005 (UTC) 1275:21:06, 18 November 2005 (UTC) 1262:18:10, 18 November 2005 (UTC) 1247:17:58, 18 November 2005 (UTC) 1222:18:06, 13 November 2005 (UTC) 1200:17:48, 13 November 2005 (UTC) 1177:15:29, 11 November 2005 (UTC) 1162:18:49, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 1142:16:27, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 1080:spelling is "judgment." The 573:, rather than to the city of 501:13:35, 8 September 2005 (UTC) 391:06:02, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 207:will no doubt be interested. 56:. If you have less time, try 1490:22:20, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 1435:16:19, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 1400:21:24, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1383:06:59, 3 December 2005 (UTC) 1368:00:50, 3 December 2005 (UTC) 1127:17:36, 8 November 2005 (UTC) 1109:16:46, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 1089:21:04, 5 November 2005 (UTC) 1070:04:13, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 1034:05:03, 5 November 2005 (UTC) 1020:02:54, 5 November 2005 (UTC) 1002:22:19, 30 October 2005 (UTC) 975:10:21, 20 October 2005 (UTC) 966:06:29, 20 October 2005 (UTC) 956:05:58, 20 October 2005 (UTC) 947:05:38, 20 October 2005 (UTC) 923:05:28, 20 October 2005 (UTC) 897:02:55, 20 October 2005 (UTC) 880:02:23, 20 October 2005 (UTC) 849:02:20, 20 October 2005 (UTC) 819:00:54, 13 October 2005 (UTC) 788:10:03, 13 October 2005 (UTC) 769:17:26, 12 October 2005 (UTC) 729:16:30, 12 October 2005 (UTC) 119:Knowledge (XXG):New user log 1084:spelling is "judgement." -- 832:. You may wish to read the 708:16:33, 7 October 2005 (UTC) 684:23:07, 4 October 2005 (UTC) 465:02:45, 30 August 2005 (UTC) 451:02:35, 30 August 2005 (UTC) 437:03:59, 10 August 2005 (UTC) 153:10:16, June 18, 2005 (EST) 1690: 423:12:32, 9 August 2005 (UTC) 409:00:28, 2 August 2005 (UTC) 325:18:35, 1 August 2005 (UTC) 74:You can experiment in the 1050:deterred from committing 692:Ninth Day Of Creation AFD 571:Long Beach Naval Shipyard 561:A lot of those ambiguous 330:I note that you've added 305:21:42, 31 July 2005 (UTC) 280:19:30, 31 July 2005 (UTC) 251:00:38, 31 July 2005 (UTC) 230:23:17, 30 July 2005 (UTC) 212:11:17, 30 July 2005 (UTC) 194:16:37, 29 July 2005 (UTC) 175:18:21, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC) 166:18:17, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) 567:Naval Station Long Beach 101:Knowledge (XXG):Civility 81:You can get help at the 46:Be bold in editing pages 1539:Bjerknes (lunar crater) 1531:Bjerknes (lunar crater) 1524:Bjerknes (lunar crater) 1408:featured article status 858:if no one has already. 180:Game theory wikiproject 93:Policies and Guidelines 63:To sign your posts (on 1636:Re: Welcome, signing. 1563:American Soccer League 1065:I hope this helps. -- 575:Long Beach, California 491: 404:article. Looks nice! 147:constructive critisism 1117:Best Response figures 985: 654:Injoined user is back 489: 1529:Ages ago, you wrote 1253:The renomination is 482:Thanks for your help 1473:bulgarian solitaire 972:CambridgeBayWeather 374:What do you think? 1621:Conspiracy (civil) 773:I really like the 492: 69:Votes for deletion 18:User talk:Kzollman 1466: 1452:comment added by 1373:Nice to meet you! 1133:Manhattan, Kansas 745:contact Bluemoose 364:Game (set theory) 1681: 1465: 1446: 1427: 1418:featured article 1388:two recent edits 1294:Game theory FAC? 1228:Re : AfD Tarrazu 1219: 1218: 1197: 1196: 1155:on similar thing 1078:American English 943: 918: 913: 908: 872: 867: 862: 785: 766: 726: 681: 643: 625: 607: 384:winning strategy 368:winning strategy 362:I could write a 332:winning strategy 1689: 1688: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1658: 1638: 1624: 1584: 1565: 1526: 1497: 1475: 1447: 1442: 1410: 1390: 1375: 1361: 1348: 1341: 1327: 1320: 1317:--best, kevin 1311: 1296: 1230: 1212: 1211: 1190: 1189: 1185: 1151: 1135: 1119: 1097: 1082:British English 1044: 988: 981:KillerChihuahua 953:Charles Stewart 939: 916: 911: 906: 870: 865: 860: 826: 803: 779: 760: 752: 720: 718:prefer. thanks 715: 694: 675: 670: 656: 639: 621: 603: 599: 559: 545: 513: 484: 475: 444:Shizuo Kakutani 416: 398: 182: 159: 139: 89:Manual of Style 39:Knowledge (XXG) 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1687: 1685: 1657: 1654: 1637: 1634: 1623: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1583: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1564: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1535: 1534: 1525: 1522: 1496: 1493: 1479:Varma Division 1474: 1471: 1469: 1441: 1438: 1409: 1403: 1389: 1386: 1374: 1371: 1360: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1344: 1339: 1323: 1318: 1310: 1307: 1295: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1265: 1264: 1229: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1184: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1150: 1145: 1134: 1131: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1043: 1042:Judgment-proof 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1026:WP:Sock puppet 987: 986:Alakon's edits 984: 900: 899: 883: 882: 825: 822: 802: 791: 732: 714: 711: 693: 690: 688: 669: 666: 655: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 598: 595: 558: 555: 544: 541: 540: 539: 529: 512: 510:Science pearls 507: 505: 483: 480: 474: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 430:Bell's theorem 415: 412: 397: 394: 376: 372: 371: 360: 355:Start another 353: 328: 327: 316: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307: 289: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 283: 282: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 235: 234: 233: 232: 215: 214: 181: 178: 177: 176: 158: 155: 138: 133: 115: 114: 107: 85: 79: 72: 61: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1686: 1677: 1676:Cheers, Mike 1674: 1670: 1667: 1666: 1663: 1655: 1653: 1652: 1649: 1644: 1641: 1635: 1633: 1632: 1629: 1622: 1619: 1613: 1610: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1600: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1589: 1581: 1577: 1574: 1573:Chris Edgemon 1570: 1569: 1568: 1562: 1558: 1555: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1545: 1540: 1532: 1528: 1527: 1523: 1521: 1520: 1517: 1511: 1510: 1507: 1503: 1494: 1492: 1491: 1488: 1485:best wishes, 1483: 1480: 1472: 1470: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1454:24.24.130.247 1451: 1439: 1437: 1436: 1433: 1428: 1426: 1421: 1419: 1415: 1407: 1404: 1402: 1401: 1398: 1394: 1387: 1385: 1384: 1381: 1372: 1370: 1369: 1366: 1358: 1352: 1349: 1347: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1328: 1326: 1316: 1308: 1306: 1305: 1302: 1293: 1289: 1286: 1285:Mailer Diablo 1282: 1281: 1276: 1273: 1272:Mailer Diablo 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1263: 1260: 1259:Mailer Diablo 1256: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1248: 1245: 1244:Mailer Diablo 1241: 1236: 1233: 1232:Hi Kzollman, 1227: 1223: 1220: 1217: 1216: 1208: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1198: 1195: 1194: 1182: 1178: 1175: 1171: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1160: 1156: 1149: 1146: 1144: 1143: 1140: 1132: 1130: 1128: 1125: 1116: 1114: 1111: 1110: 1107: 1103: 1094: 1090: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1068: 1063: 1059: 1057: 1053: 1047: 1041: 1035: 1032: 1027: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1000: 996: 993: 983: 982: 977: 976: 973: 968: 967: 964: 958: 957: 954: 949: 948: 945: 942: 936: 933: 930: 925: 924: 921: 920: 919: 914: 909: 898: 895: 894: 890: 885: 884: 881: 877: 873: 868: 863: 857: 853: 852: 851: 850: 847: 844: 839: 835: 831: 830:administrator 823: 821: 820: 816: 812: 808: 800: 796: 792: 790: 789: 786: 784: 783: 776: 771: 770: 767: 765: 764: 757: 750: 746: 742: 739:Please visit 738: 736: 731: 730: 727: 725: 724: 712: 710: 709: 706: 701: 699: 691: 689: 686: 685: 682: 680: 679: 667: 665: 664: 661: 653: 647: 644: 642: 637: 631: 630: 629: 626: 624: 619: 614: 613: 612: 611: 608: 606: 596: 594: 593: 590: 584: 583: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 556: 554: 553: 550: 542: 538: 535: 530: 527: 526: 525: 524: 521: 516: 511: 508: 506: 503: 502: 499: 497: 488: 481: 479: 472: 466: 463: 459: 454: 453: 452: 449: 445: 441: 440: 439: 438: 435: 431: 425: 424: 421: 413: 411: 410: 407: 403: 395: 393: 392: 389: 385: 381: 375: 369: 365: 361: 358: 354: 351: 350: 349: 346: 344: 339: 337: 333: 326: 323: 318: 317: 306: 303: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 281: 278: 274: 270: 267:Just noticed 266: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 252: 249: 245: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 236: 231: 228: 224: 219: 218: 217: 216: 213: 210: 206: 202: 198: 197: 196: 195: 192: 191:Treborbassett 188: 179: 174: 169: 168: 167: 165: 156: 154: 152: 148: 144: 137: 134: 132: 131: 127: 122: 120: 112: 108: 106: 102: 98: 94: 90: 86: 84: 80: 77: 73: 70: 66: 62: 59: 55: 51: 50: 49: 47: 42: 40: 36: 35: 26: 19: 1675: 1671: 1668: 1659: 1648:DodgerOfZion 1645: 1642: 1639: 1625: 1585: 1566: 1536: 1512: 1498: 1484: 1476: 1468: 1443: 1429: 1422: 1411: 1391: 1376: 1362: 1342: 1321: 1313: 1312: 1297: 1239: 1237: 1234: 1231: 1214: 1213: 1206: 1192: 1191: 1186: 1152: 1136: 1120: 1112: 1098: 1064: 1060: 1048: 1045: 1025: 989: 979:Wow, Gratz! 978: 969: 959: 950: 940: 926: 904: 903: 901: 892: 887: 838:how-to guide 834:reading list 827: 811:my talk page 804: 781: 780: 772: 762: 761: 753: 733: 722: 721: 716: 702: 695: 687: 677: 676: 671: 657: 640: 634: 622: 616: 604: 600: 585: 560: 546: 517: 514: 504: 493: 476: 426: 417: 399: 377: 373: 347: 340: 329: 183: 160: 142: 140: 123: 116: 43: 32: 30: 1662:Martial Law 1656:Can you.... 1448:—Preceding 1414:Game theory 1412:Hey Kevin, 1406:Game theory 1013:User:Alakon 992:User:Alakon 929:Merovingian 775:Game theory 543:persistence 414:Game Theory 380:determinacy 336:determinacy 205:User:Wragge 1582:Maintained 1315:confusion. 1309:signatures 1086:Coolcaesar 1067:Coolcaesar 893:Roby Wayne 799:October 18 705:Daemon8666 641:Roby Wayne 623:Roby Wayne 605:Roby Wayne 563:Long Beach 557:Long Beach 462:Isomorphic 448:Isomorphic 406:Isomorphic 130:Talk to me 65:talk pages 1609:Pete.Hurd 1599:Pete.Hurd 1588:Pete.Hurd 1440:complaint 1432:Pete.Hurd 1397:Pete.Hurd 1365:Pete.Hurd 1301:Pete.Hurd 1124:Pete.Hurd 1031:Pete.Hurd 1017:Pete.Hurd 999:Pete.Hurd 963:Pete.Hurd 735:Bluemoose 660:Nate Ladd 528:Hi Kevin, 402:dominance 388:Trovatore 322:Pete.Hurd 302:Bluemoose 277:Bluemoose 248:Bluemoose 227:Bluemoose 209:Bluemoose 187:bluemoose 151:Alvinrune 136:Causality 83:Help Desk 76:test area 1462:contribs 1450:unsigned 1139:Kgwo1972 1095:lysdexia 668:Hi Kevin 547:Thanks. 173:Kzollman 164:Maurreen 126:Utcursch 54:Tutorial 52:Try the 1628:David91 1380:Khamsin 1046:Hello: 1009:User:Fn 871:dwolf24 815:Johntex 589:Epheron 579:—wwoods 515:Hello, 496:Psy guy 458:Michiko 420:Evercat 34:welcome 27:Welcome 1516:john k 1506:john k 1487:Robinh 1240:Cheers 1215:Martin 1209:day! 1193:Martin 807:OOPSLA 795:Meetup 782:Martin 763:Martin 723:Martin 678:Martin 597:Popups 396:Thanks 1416:is a 1183:reply 1056:crime 1052:torts 1011:is a 888:: --> 856:WP:LA 824:Sysop 713:Reply 635:: --> 617:: --> 549:Banno 434:CSTAR 16:< 1502:here 1458:talk 1346:TALK 1325:TALK 1255:here 1106:Talk 876:talk 846:aran 836:and 801:2005 754:See 473:Hey! 271:and 91:and 31:Hi! 1554:RJH 1544:RJH 1359:BHW 1249::) 1207:her 1102:Dan 935:(c) 932:(t) 907:Ban 843:Pak 797:on 569:or 534:APH 520:APH 143:was 124:-- 37:to 1646:-- 1464:) 1460:• 1242:, 1238:- 1129:. 1104:| 1058:. 878:) 817:\ 813:. 577:. 149:. 128:| 121:. 103:, 99:, 95:, 67:, 41:! 1456:( 1343:/ 1340:└ 1322:/ 1319:└ 944:) 941:e 938:( 917:s 912:e 889:: 874:( 866:e 861:R 636:: 618:: 370:. 113:. 78:. 60:.

Index

User talk:Kzollman
welcome
Knowledge (XXG)
Be bold in editing pages
Tutorial
Knowledge (XXG):How to edit a page
talk pages
Votes for deletion
test area
Help Desk
Manual of Style
Policies and Guidelines
Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view
Knowledge (XXG):Civility
Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not
Knowledge (XXG):Changing attribution for an edit
Knowledge (XXG):New user log
Utcursch
Talk to me
Causality
constructive critisism
Alvinrune
Maurreen
Kzollman
bluemoose
Treborbassett
16:37, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
economics and business section
User:Wragge
Bluemoose

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑