83:
27:
135:
245:
rather than make edits yourself. It's just very easy to take things personally when you are involved with the subject of an article and potentially stand to gain from it being added or deleted on
Knowledge. I'm not trying to be harsh, just say that I have reason to suspect this and you're taking the
157:
content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about
240:
I have to ask, because I've enough reason to suspect it. Are you editing on behalf of Monroe
Studios/Legacy Features? I'm asking because your name shares the same initials as Legacy Features. Please be aware that this is a conflict of interest and can be seen as advertising, considering that you
109:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
53:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
113:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
57:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
139:
241:
might be involved with the company. There's nothing that says you absolutely cannot edit, but it does mean that it's discouraged and that you might want to go through
106:
50:
95:
39:
207:
183:
154:
147:
179:
143:
172:
articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
222:
159:
99:
43:
215:
211:
206:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to
251:
230:
119:
63:
142:
your contributions to
Knowledge, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
221:
For information on how to contribute to
Knowledge when you have a conflict of interest, please see
90:
74:
158:
that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by
247:
226:
165:
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
115:
59:
242:
193:
34:
18:
192:
to the
Knowledge article or website of your organization in other articles (see
186:, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
255:
234:
202:
so that you do not accidentally breach
Knowledge's content policies.
123:
67:
170:
Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating
146:
on
Knowledge, you may need to consider our guidance on
88:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
32:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
178:. Everyone is welcome to provide information about
153:
All editors are required to comply with
Knowledge's
94:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge according to
38:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge according to
223:our frequently asked questions for organizations
162:and writing with as little bias as possible.
51:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Lauren Lakis
8:
107:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Lauren Lakis
246:deletion discussions a little personally.
176:Be cautious about deletion discussions
7:
96:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
40:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
14:
105:The article will be discussed at
49:The article will be discussed at
133:
81:
25:
129:Potential conflict of interest
1:
212:verifiability of information
256:09:15, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
235:09:15, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
124:08:17, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
68:08:17, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
272:
98:or whether it should be
42:or whether it should be
200:Exercise great caution
144:you have written about
208:neutral point of view
155:neutral point of view
148:conflicts of interest
243:the film WikiProject
184:deletion discussions
180:independent sources
138:Hello, LFPRESS. We
263:
160:reliable sources
137:
136:
85:
84:
29:
28:
271:
270:
266:
265:
264:
262:
261:
260:
216:autobiographies
134:
131:
86:
82:
79:
30:
26:
23:
12:
11:
5:
269:
267:
259:
258:
204:
203:
197:
194:Knowledge:Spam
187:
173:
130:
127:
80:
78:
73:Nomination of
71:
24:
22:
17:Nomination of
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
268:
257:
253:
249:
244:
239:
238:
237:
236:
232:
228:
225:. Thank you.
224:
219:
217:
213:
209:
201:
198:
195:
191:
190:Avoid linking
188:
185:
181:
177:
174:
171:
168:
167:
166:
163:
161:
156:
151:
149:
145:
141:
128:
126:
125:
121:
117:
111:
108:
103:
101:
97:
93:
92:
76:
72:
70:
69:
65:
61:
55:
52:
47:
45:
41:
37:
36:
20:
16:
220:
205:
199:
189:
175:
169:
164:
152:
132:
112:
104:
89:
87:
77:for deletion
56:
48:
35:Lauren Lakis
33:
31:
21:for deletion
19:Lauren Lakis
248:Tokyogirl79
227:Tokyogirl79
116:Tokyogirl79
91:Ewan Bourne
75:Ewan Bourne
60:Tokyogirl79
140:welcome
100:deleted
44:deleted
214:, and
252:talk
231:talk
120:talk
64:talk
182:in
150:.
254:)
233:)
218:.
210:,
196:).
122:)
102:.
66:)
46:.
250:(
229:(
118:(
62:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.