Knowledge

User talk:Lam Kin Keung

Source 📝

1358: 1310:
There is more to do to clarify that majority view. Proponents of the neuro-linguistic programming are likely to claim majority views are irrelevant if those sources did no direct measurement of the neuro-linguistic programming. It is a common pseudo-scientific objection similar to; you have to try it for yourself to understand it. That can be clarified in the article.
1309:
Sources show what is obvious to most science literate readers when they read the phrase. They show that the neuro-linguistic programming is as pseudo-scientific as it sounds. Neuro-linguistic programming is intrinsically misleading and obscurantic and care should be taken to make that point clearer.
1269:
I'm still new at this and apologize for not bringing these matters up in the appropriate forum previously: I'm intending to clean up the NLP article. At the moment it reads as very imbalanced with 'scientific' support overreaching its findings, self-referencing and the use of value-laden terminology.
983:
I looked at the history and found that it was you who removed the attribution to OED and plagiarized it by removing the quotes and attributing it to someone else. Please make the necessary adjustments so this does not happen again. Why exactly did you remove the quote from the OED and attribute it to
1157:
Hi LKK, I think that it is possible to improve the articles related to NLP. I would suggest that you read closely the WP:FRINGE guidelines. Do you think that it applies to writing an article on NLP? I'm trying to find fertile ground in editors can work collaboratively. -Reconsolidation (talk) 09:07,
1277:
Secondly: Glasner-Edwards and Rawson simply quote Norcross et al. There is no "scientific evidence" - their methodology was to ask non-experts in the domain with at best rudimentary and outdated representations of the domain, whether they believed that this "thing" worked. The valid conclusion from
1273:
Firstly: "balance of scientific evidence reveals it to be a largely discredited pseudoscience." There has been no 'scientific evidence' of NLP being "pseudoscience". The balance of scientific evidence has not supported the explicit assumptions of NLP, though the bulk of that evidence is decades old
162:
Ok, I'll assume good faith but will keep an eye on your edits. Just ensure that you abide by the arbcom rules for this article. The arbcom ruling requires that we first discuss any changes on the talk page first and that we ascribe any views to reputable/reliable sources. Also ensure that you abide
861:
Re-Lam Kin Keung, You deleted a heavily referenced paragraph that included a quote by one of the leading psychoanalysts in the country from Columbia University without explanation. You requested for further dialogue in the changelog. I'm not sure what additional information you require than the
334:
Lam Kin Keung, You deleted a heavily referenced paragraph that included a quote by one of the leading psychoanalysts in the country from Columbia University without explanation. You requested for further dialogue in the changelog. I'm not sure what additional information you require than the
733:
On 1 January 2005, RAU ceased to exist as such, when its campus and some campuses of the now defunct Technikon Witwatersrand and Vista University merged to become the University of Johannesburg. The outgoing and final vice chancellor of the RAU was Prof Roux Botha. Thanks if you do it. Earl de
468:
I noticed that all your edits to other pages are minor and uncontroversial except for your edits to the article about NLP. You reverted me just then and said that it needed to be discussed. The reasons for my changes are quite clear if you read the edit comments and the changes I made. You are
283:
Lam Kin Keung, I'm trying to include in the article quotes from one of the most respected psychoanalysts in the country who is on the faculty of Columbia University. You have repeatedly deleted his quote without explanation. Please learn about brain plasticity from the sources that have been
654:
Hi. You have undone my addition to the history of Rand Afrikaans University yesterday. I actually wrote that the school ceased to exist. Did it not? Did it it exist? Yes or no? Does it exist? Yes or no, please. Reply to these twe, then we'll talk again. Thanks in advance.
469:
letting your own biases get in the way here. See if you can "write for the enemy" and at least attempt to write from a NPOV. You need to start working with the other editors even if you don't like them. At the moment you just seem to be talking past each other. --
1278:
this is that these people don't regard what they perceive NLP to 'be' works. To put three sentences of the opening section of the article into making such statements adds unwarranted weight to what are essentially unqualified, outdated opinions.
909:
LKK, you have not taken the approach you are advocating with your own edits, none of which have been referenced. But you are asking for that approach for the most well referenced inclusions in the article, which is clearly a mistake.
719:
Hello Lam Kin Keung. Sorry for the rude tone at the beginning. I was at that univerity and am really sorry it merged with lower-level and less renouned institutions (though it was not itself a great one, after Stellenbosch, Potch and
913:
By deleting quotes from the most well respected people in the psychoanalysis community you are vandalizing this website repeatedly. You offer no facts -- just links to wikipedia rules that you do not follow yourself.
382:
I strongly suggest you revise your draft to take into account significant other points of view. I don't want you to fall into the trap that some proponents do (i.e. confirmation bias). We have to keep impartial here.
1409:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1242:
You are engaging in the slow edit war. You have attempted using a different ID to remove and marginalize the evidence based view that neuro-linguistic programming appears on lists of discredited interventions
416:
It is not clear what you are saying here. What are the counter-arguments? You also need to rewrite the draft using an impartial tone. Have you found a source which critiques your "scientific skepticism" POV?
756:
Thank you for the extra information. I will have a closer look. Feel free to make any changes yourself. I am not sure how much you know about editing Knowledge. Here is the policy page just in the case
1274:
and targeted elements of NLP that are of little or no relevance to NLP as it is used today. That some would consider NLP as 'largely discredited pseudoscience' is not supported by scientific evidence.
615:
What gives Stollznow's opinion so much weight in your mind? Did you notice that it was from an opinion column in a Skeptic's magazine? How do we deal with this sort of potential source of bias? --
316:. I will move your edits to the discussion page, where we can discuss the merits or demerits of them. I have already placed some comments there regarding your prior edits. Please discuss 398:
The current draft is fine. It has good multiple sources coming from the scientific skepticism view. More can be added on to it in the article when more sources support those views.
144:
My writing style is developed from a lot of dictionary use and grammar checks. If it is similar to other people then I guess they use the dictionary and grammar checker too.
1135: 1281:
As I perceive it, there are more than enough flaws with elements of NLP to at least be rigorous in the statements made so we can strive to put forth a balanced view.
1188: 1080: 1022:
Dear User:Lam King Keung, my apologies! I was reverting vandalism and must have reverted to the wrong version. I hope you have a Merry Christmas! With regards,
535:
Can you explain why you chose that quote from Karen's column? Why did you assign it so much weight and put it as the first sentence in that section? --
1057: 1053: 261:
If someone says they are an expert in the field of cognitive linguistics, I am entitled to ask for confirmation. I don't need to know specifics. --
812: 1207: 1174: 985: 946: 616: 536: 470: 418: 384: 262: 228: 209: 168: 128: 1434: 662: 227:
Can you prove to a trustworthy third party that you have a PhD in cognitive linguistics as you have implied? What was your thesis topic? --
921:
Hello Encyclotadd. Please provide diffs to the accusations you make. As far as I know, I follow Knowledge sourcing recommendations well.
284:
provided to you so that you understand why this is very important information to include in the article at forefront of modern research.
1270:
There are appropriate criticisms of elements of NLP that should not be discredited because they are difficult to identify from the mess.
1111:
Keung, Do you have any more claims or evidence to submit regarding your allegations that I disrupted wikipedia? I'm working on my reply.
1297: 440: 26: 741: 878: 351: 300: 1430: 1371:
are no longer functional. You've been identified as a user of STiki, and are kindly asked to upgrade to the current version at
1099: 1375:
before continuing with use of the tool. Continuing to use older versions will be detrimental to the STiki project. Please see
141:
No I never have been banned from Knowledge. I got banned from a nightclub before but I was in my teenager years (under age).
820: 730:
Thanks for the correction. But the mention of Technikon Witwatersrand -- as it stands now -- is misplaced. I suggest this:
127:
Hi, have you previous been banned from editing wikipedia? You writing style is similar to a banned user. Please explain. --
47: 52: 43: 1421:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1426: 56: 1339: 1232: 1203: 1170: 989: 950: 816: 620: 540: 474: 422: 388: 266: 232: 213: 172: 132: 62: 1112: 666: 1293: 782: 745: 33: 22: 335:
original texts themselves? But that is one of the most interesting and now supported arguments in NLP.
242:
You are not allowed to ask questions that would lead to identification. Far too much AGF failure here --
1289: 1065: 874: 347: 296: 69: 862:
original texts themselves? But that is one of the most interesting and now supported arguments in NLP.
1376: 1335: 1285: 1228: 1199: 1195: 1166: 1162: 1087: 866: 737: 658: 339: 288: 73: 1422: 1143: 1120: 1095: 85: 77: 1311: 1250: 1033: 1003: 964: 922: 895: 838: 799: 762: 692: 574: 502: 443: 399: 366: 320: 148: 109: 38: 29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 84:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 1398: 1389: 1418: 1402: 1364: 1061: 870: 343: 292: 164: 1417:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1372: 1368: 788: 317: 1124: 1103: 1079:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
1052:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
1414: 1406: 1139: 1116: 1091: 758: 98: 1410: 891: 313: 243: 186: 688:
Hello IP. I believe I improved the sentence. Here is another suggestion though:
573:
Stollznow is an expert in linguistics. The statement explains what NLP is about.
312:
Hello Encyclotadd. Knowledge is not improved by forcing edits. Please adhere to
1023: 1032:
Its an easy mistake to make here. I have done similar myself. Merry Christmas.
784: 1438: 1343: 1319: 1301: 1258: 1236: 1211: 1147: 1069: 1041: 1026: 1011: 993: 972: 954: 930: 903: 882: 846: 824: 807: 792: 770: 749: 700: 670: 624: 582: 544: 510: 478: 451: 426: 407: 392: 374: 355: 328: 304: 270: 252: 236: 217: 195: 176: 156: 136: 117: 103: 93: 88:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place 1379:
for a discussion of this issue or to respond to this message. Thank you!
1191:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
1083:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
1056:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "
691:. Please don't consider this a criticism. Your editing is welcome. 1334:
in more detail. I think my change was more accurate and concise. --
1227:. Don't just accuse me of edit warring. Deal with the evidence. -- 81: 1405:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
1352: 815:. Please see my note there. Hopefully CU can clear the air 1331: 1247: 1244: 1224: 1138:) but it found that you were unrelated to that user. -- 1075:
Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard
1000: 961: 942: 689: 500: 208:
It is linked at the top of the article talk page. --
1397:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1136:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Lam Kin Keung 1189:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 1081:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 185:Please provide a link to that arbcom ruling -- 8: 1187:Hello. There is currently a discussion at 917:That's highly improper in any forum IMHO. 68:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 1367:to the wiki software, older versions of 1054:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard 813:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/NLP 92:before the question. Again, welcome! + 7: 1058:Oxford English Dictionary definition 14: 1423:review the candidates' statements 1356: 941:Why did you make this revision, 890:Hello Encyclotadd. Please read 53:How to create your first article 1429:. For the Election committee, 1399:Arbitration Committee election 1390:ArbCom elections are now open! 163:closely by the NPOV policies. 1: 1439:14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 1320:03:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 1302:02:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 1246:. You have been told before 1212:04:06, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 1113:see section here for my reply 1042:02:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 1027:10:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC) 1012:01:53, 26 November 2011 (UTC) 994:23:35, 25 November 2011 (UTC) 973:14:45, 24 November 2011 (UTC) 955:22:38, 23 November 2011 (UTC) 798:The investigation is closed. 118:06:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 104:14:22, 13 November 2009 (UTC) 34:The five pillars of Knowledge 1330:Can you please explain this 1265:Neuro-Linguistic Programming 1148:06:24, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 1125:08:12, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 1104:22:16, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 1070:01:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 931:03:49, 1 November 2011 (UTC) 904:02:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC) 883:01:25, 11 October 2011 (UTC) 847:11:23, 1 November 2011 (UTC) 825:09:46, 1 November 2011 (UTC) 781:You are under investigation 375:02:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC) 356:01:25, 11 October 2011 (UTC) 329:09:56, 12 October 2011 (UTC) 305:15:59, 11 October 2011 (UTC) 25:to Knowledge! Thank you for 1425:and submit your choices on 1381:04:19, 21 August 2013 (UTC) 1377:Knowledge talk:STiki#Errors 1259:03:39, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 1237:03:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 1454: 1431:MediaWiki message delivery 1074: 279:views other than skeptics? 271:13:35, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 253:04:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 237:02:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 218:02:54, 27 April 2011 (UTC) 196:15:25, 26 April 2011 (UTC) 177:13:16, 26 April 2011 (UTC) 157:09:32, 26 April 2011 (UTC) 137:08:46, 26 April 2011 (UTC) 108:Thank you An. Regards LK. 21:Hello, Lam Kin Keung, and 1134:I requested a checkuser ( 771:03:57, 24 June 2011 (UTC) 750:18:52, 18 June 2011 (UTC) 701:07:52, 10 June 2011 (UTC) 671:06:37, 10 June 2011 (UTC) 645:Rand Afrikaans University 625:11:38, 12 July 2011 (UTC) 583:04:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC) 545:12:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 365:Please see my reply below 1373:Knowledge:STiki#Download 1344:22:22, 8 July 2013 (UTC) 1315: 1254: 1158:27 November 2012 (UTC) 1037: 1007: 968: 926: 899: 842: 808:03:49, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 803: 793:02:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 777:Sockpuppet investigation 766: 696: 578: 511:04:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC) 506: 479:14:24, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 447: 403: 370: 324: 152: 113: 1223:Can you please explain 857:Sources and conclusions 452:03:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC) 427:00:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC) 408:05:28, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 393:02:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 48:How to develop articles 1403:Arbitration Committee 1219:Please explain revert 1153:WP:FRINGE guidelines. 837:Thank you William M. 817:William M. Connolley 167:is also relevant. -- 1407:arbitration process 1130:Sydactive checkuser 86:Knowledge:Questions 1419:arbitration policy 999:Again, please see 960:Again, please see 44:How to edit a page 27:your contributions 1386: 1385: 1382: 1305: 1288:comment added by 1215: 1198:comment added by 1179: 1165:comment added by 1107: 1090:comment added by 1060:". Thank you. -- 886: 869:comment added by 740:comment added by 661:comment added by 359: 342:comment added by 308: 291:comment added by 251: 194: 76:your messages on 1445: 1380: 1363:Hello! Due to a 1360: 1359: 1353: 1304: 1282: 1214: 1192: 1178: 1159: 1106: 1084: 1018:Re:December 2011 984:someone else? -- 885: 863: 752: 673: 358: 336: 307: 285: 250: 248: 193: 191: 91: 78:discussion pages 1453: 1452: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1427:the voting page 1393: 1365:security update 1357: 1351: 1349:STiki emergency 1336:Reconsolidation 1328: 1283: 1267: 1229:Reconsolidation 1221: 1200:Reconsolidation 1193: 1185: 1167:Reconsolidation 1160: 1155: 1132: 1085: 1077: 1050: 1020: 986:122.108.140.210 981: 947:122.108.140.210 939: 864: 859: 779: 735: 656: 647: 617:122.108.140.210 537:122.108.140.210 471:122.108.140.210 419:122.108.140.210 385:122.108.140.210 337: 286: 281: 263:122.108.140.210 244: 229:122.108.140.210 210:122.108.140.210 187: 169:122.108.140.210 129:122.108.140.210 125: 89: 63:Manual of Style 12: 11: 5: 1451: 1449: 1396: 1392: 1387: 1384: 1383: 1361: 1350: 1347: 1327: 1326:discuss revert 1324: 1323: 1322: 1266: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1220: 1217: 1184: 1181: 1154: 1151: 1131: 1128: 1110: 1076: 1073: 1049: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1019: 1016: 1015: 1014: 980: 977: 976: 975: 938: 935: 934: 933: 907: 906: 858: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 830: 829: 828: 827: 778: 775: 774: 773: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 663:83.242.181.178 646: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 432: 431: 430: 429: 411: 410: 380: 379: 378: 377: 332: 331: 280: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 256: 255: 225: 224: 223: 222: 221: 220: 201: 200: 199: 198: 180: 179: 124: 121: 66: 65: 60: 57:Article Wizard 50: 41: 36: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1450: 1441: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1391: 1388: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1355: 1354: 1348: 1346: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1312:Lam Kin Keung 1308: 1307: 1306: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1290:Mrdanielsmith 1287: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1251:Lam Kin Keung 1248: 1245: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1218: 1216: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1190: 1182: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1152: 1150: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1129: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1082: 1072: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1034:Lam Kin Keung 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1025: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1004:Lam Kin Keung 1001: 998: 997: 996: 995: 991: 987: 978: 974: 970: 966: 965:Lam Kin Keung 962: 959: 958: 957: 956: 952: 948: 944: 937:recent revert 936: 932: 928: 924: 923:Lam Kin Keung 920: 919: 918: 915: 911: 905: 901: 897: 896:Lam Kin Keung 893: 889: 888: 887: 884: 880: 876: 872: 868: 856: 848: 844: 840: 839:Lam Kin Keung 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 826: 822: 818: 814: 811: 810: 809: 805: 801: 800:Lam Kin Keung 797: 796: 795: 794: 790: 786: 783: 776: 772: 768: 764: 763:Lam Kin Keung 760: 755: 754: 753: 751: 747: 743: 739: 731: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 702: 698: 694: 693:Lam Kin Keung 690: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 672: 668: 664: 660: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 644: 626: 622: 618: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 584: 580: 576: 575:Lam Kin Keung 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 546: 542: 538: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 512: 508: 504: 503:Lam Kin Keung 501: 498: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 480: 476: 472: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 453: 449: 445: 444:Lam Kin Keung 442: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 428: 424: 420: 415: 414: 413: 412: 409: 405: 401: 400:Lam Kin Keung 397: 396: 395: 394: 390: 386: 376: 372: 368: 367:Lam Kin Keung 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 330: 326: 322: 321:Lam Kin Keung 318: 315: 311: 310: 309: 306: 302: 298: 294: 290: 278: 272: 268: 264: 260: 259: 258: 257: 254: 249: 247: 241: 240: 239: 238: 234: 230: 219: 215: 211: 207: 206: 205: 204: 203: 202: 197: 192: 190: 184: 183: 182: 181: 178: 174: 170: 166: 161: 160: 159: 158: 154: 150: 149:Lam Kin Keung 147:Who are you? 145: 142: 139: 138: 134: 130: 122: 120: 119: 115: 111: 110:Lam Kin Keung 106: 105: 102: 101: 97: 96: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 64: 61: 58: 54: 51: 49: 45: 42: 40: 37: 35: 32: 31: 30: 28: 24: 19: 18: 1394: 1329: 1284:— Preceding 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1222: 1194:— Preceding 1186: 1161:— Preceding 1156: 1133: 1109: 1086:— Preceding 1078: 1051: 1048:January 2012 1021: 982: 940: 916: 912: 908: 865:— Preceding 860: 780: 742:91.77.128.26 736:— Preceding 732: 729: 657:— Preceding 381: 338:— Preceding 333: 287:— Preceding 282: 245: 226: 188: 146: 143: 140: 126: 107: 99: 94: 67: 59:if you wish) 20: 16: 15: 1062:Encyclotadd 871:Encyclotadd 344:Encyclotadd 293:Encyclotadd 80:using four 55:(using the 1415:topic bans 734:Galantha 90:{{helpme}} 70:Wikipedian 1411:site bans 1140:122.x.x.x 1117:122.x.x.x 1092:122.x.x.x 979:plagarism 165:WP:FRINGE 72:! Please 1298:contribs 1286:unsigned 1208:contribs 1196:unsigned 1175:contribs 1163:unsigned 1100:contribs 1088:unsigned 879:contribs 867:unsigned 738:unsigned 720:Rhodes). 659:unsigned 441:NPOV FAQ 352:contribs 340:unsigned 301:contribs 289:unsigned 39:Tutorial 17:Welcome! 759:WP:NPOV 246:Snowded 189:Snowded 123:banned? 23:welcome 1401:. The 1332:revert 1024:Anupam 892:WP:BRD 439:Read: 314:WP:BRD 82:tildes 1369:STiki 785:ANJPL 499:See: 1435:talk 1340:talk 1316:talk 1294:talk 1255:talk 1233:talk 1225:edit 1204:talk 1171:talk 1144:talk 1121:talk 1096:talk 1066:talk 1038:talk 1008:talk 990:talk 969:talk 951:talk 945:? -- 943:diff 927:talk 900:talk 875:talk 843:talk 821:talk 804:talk 789:talk 767:talk 746:talk 697:talk 667:talk 621:talk 579:talk 541:talk 507:talk 475:talk 448:talk 423:talk 404:talk 389:talk 371:talk 348:talk 325:talk 297:talk 267:talk 233:talk 214:talk 173:talk 153:talk 133:talk 114:talk 74:sign 46:and 1395:Hi, 1183:ANI 894:. 1437:) 1413:, 1342:) 1318:) 1300:) 1296:• 1257:) 1249:. 1235:) 1210:) 1206:• 1177:) 1173:• 1146:) 1123:) 1115:-- 1102:) 1098:• 1068:) 1040:) 1010:) 992:) 971:) 963:. 953:) 929:) 902:) 881:) 877:• 845:) 823:) 806:) 791:) 769:) 761:. 748:) 699:) 669:) 623:) 581:) 543:) 509:) 477:) 450:) 425:) 417:-- 406:) 391:) 383:-- 373:) 354:) 350:• 327:) 319:. 303:) 299:• 269:) 235:) 216:) 175:) 155:) 135:) 116:) 100:gr 95:An 1433:( 1338:( 1314:( 1292:( 1253:( 1231:( 1202:( 1169:( 1142:( 1119:( 1094:( 1064:( 1036:( 1006:( 1002:. 988:( 967:( 949:( 925:( 898:( 873:( 841:( 819:( 802:( 787:( 765:( 744:( 695:( 665:( 619:( 577:( 539:( 505:( 473:( 446:( 421:( 402:( 387:( 369:( 346:( 323:( 295:( 265:( 231:( 212:( 171:( 151:( 131:( 112:(

Index

welcome
your contributions
The five pillars of Knowledge
Tutorial
How to edit a page
How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Article Wizard
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign
discussion pages
tildes
Knowledge:Questions
An
gr
14:22, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Lam Kin Keung
talk
06:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
122.108.140.210
talk
08:46, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Lam Kin Keung
talk
09:32, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
WP:FRINGE
122.108.140.210
talk
13:16, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.