241:
Secondly, notability is not very evident within the article. I think it would help if sourced information can be added to the article to explain to the reader as to what makes this person notable. A couple of lines in the opening paragraph, and then a bit more detail in the main body of the article
314:
I am affiliated with LA&K PR, which represents Simon & Partners LLP. It is my goal to make neutral, fact-based edits to the article, per the suggestions made on its discussion page and the wikipedia clean up project. Please feel free to discuss any edits you feel are not consistent with
150:
to your note on my page, I've copied it here: I have changed my opinion to keep, and stated why on the deletion talk page. Should the article be kept, would you like a hand in improving the article? I will admit that I know nothing about this person, but I could at least help out with grammar
264:
I've added a to-do list on the article's talk page that we can work through. I've also added a question about conflict of interest - I just want it to be made clear to others at the start if you do have any connection with the topic. If you have, it shouldn't be a problem, so long as it is
270:
I would suggest that we carry on any further discussion about the article on the article's talk page. If you want to ask me about other matters, please drop me a line on my talk page - I'll be glad to answer any questions you might have.
191:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!
242:
will help enormously. Think of it this way - someone has stumbled upon this article, and start to read it. You would like them to read all the way through, become informed, and above all else, glad that they have read it.
228:
If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be needed to prove notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.
237:
You have added some secondary sources, and I see that the original nominator has withdrawn the call for deletion, so that article does stand a good case for being kept. However, more sources will help.
131:
You are most welcome. Just keep the tag as it is. One admin will come and remove it as per wikipedia policies. Feel free to buzz me if you feel like asking me any question in future. Cheers! --
295:
policies, since it generally results in bad publicity when
Knowledge (XXG) editors discover press agents secretly editing their clients' pages without disclosing their interests up front.
225:
A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject.
112:
249:
Once notability has been firmly established and the article saved, then we can get on down to improving the article. Who knows - this may yet become a featured article!
115:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
217:
I got a message from an anonymous IP address, and I suspect it was from you. To save the article, firstly you need to ensure it meets the notability guidelines on
231:
Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.
188:
48:
43:
108:
53:
185:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
26:
139:
123:
91:
111:. I do not feel that this article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at
33:
22:
60:
276:
254:
156:
178:
64:
174:
76:
68:
38:
272:
250:
152:
29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
75:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
197:
208:
147:
104:
292:
243:
218:
137:
121:
89:
300:
193:
132:
116:
84:
79:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place
151:
consistancies, and all the other things that can help improve an article?
296:
187:
315:
wikipedia's mission, or that you feel may compromise its integrity.
304:
280:
258:
201:
182:
160:
141:
125:
93:
72:
177:
and
Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
221:. The main one that needs to be addressed is (from WP:BIO):
173:
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
113:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Bradley D. Simon
291:
If so, you may wish to be aware of
Knowledge (XXG)'s
8:
59:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
146:In case you didn't see my response about
83:before the question. Again, welcome! --
7:
34:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
246:will help you a great deal there.
99:AfD nomination of Bradley D. Simon
25:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
186:
287:Are you related to LA&K PR?
107:, an article you created, for
1:
305:16:28, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
49:How to write a great article
329:
281:12:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
259:14:49, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
202:18:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
161:10:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
142:22:13, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
126:23:21, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
94:21:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
77:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
293:conflict of interest
44:How to edit a page
27:your contributions
21:Hello, Lakpr, and
169:Your recent edits
103:I have nominated
67:your messages on
320:
209:Bradley D. Simon
190:
148:Bradley D. Simon
135:
119:
105:Bradley D. Simon
87:
82:
69:discussion pages
328:
327:
323:
322:
321:
319:
318:
317:
312:
289:
212:
181:by typing four
179:sign your posts
171:
133:
117:
101:
85:
80:
54:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
326:
324:
311:
310:COI Disclosure
308:
288:
285:
284:
283:
267:
266:
235:
234:
233:
232:
229:
211:
205:
170:
167:
166:
165:
164:
163:
100:
97:
57:
56:
51:
46:
41:
36:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
325:
316:
309:
307:
306:
302:
298:
294:
286:
282:
278:
274:
273:StephenBuxton
269:
268:
263:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
251:StephenBuxton
247:
245:
239:
230:
227:
226:
224:
223:
222:
220:
215:
210:
206:
204:
203:
199:
195:
189:
184:
180:
176:
168:
162:
158:
154:
153:StephenBuxton
149:
145:
144:
143:
140:
138:
136:
130:
129:
128:
127:
124:
122:
120:
114:
110:
106:
98:
96:
95:
92:
90:
88:
78:
74:
70:
66:
62:
55:
52:
50:
47:
45:
42:
40:
37:
35:
32:
31:
30:
28:
24:
19:
18:
313:
290:
248:
240:
236:
216:
213:
207:How to save
172:
102:
58:
20:
16:
15:
71:using four
175:talk pages
81:{{helpme}}
61:Wikipedian
265:declared.
63:! Please
109:deletion
39:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
194:SineBot
23:welcome
244:WP:MOS
219:WP:BIO
183:tildes
73:tildes
301:talk
277:talk
255:talk
214:Hi!
198:talk
157:talk
134:Niaz
118:Niaz
86:Niaz
65:sign
297:THF
303:)
279:)
257:)
200:)
192:--
159:)
299:(
275:(
253:(
196:(
155:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.