User talk:Lar/Archive 55

2809:

Perhaps you should warn the other user in kind, seen in the history, that gave the user a final warning. You seem to be nitpicking everything I do, following me around, you want to perhaps stop? Why aren't you giving Tony1 or OhConfucius this kind of attention. The editor are clearly uncivil, and do have a history of baiting. So instead of inserting yourself in my problems without a full story, why don't you do it to someone else, unless you of course try and take the necessary time to read all relevant material, and perhaps stop sticking to little thing I do, and treating me like I'm some foe of yours. As noted above, you haven't warned any of the other users in the history of that talk page, so until you do, please don't talk to me. I already have several other admins watching my movements, I don't need another, and I certainly don't need another who isn't willing to look at all relevant material, and warn others where appropriate.—

1614:

attempting to quiet another storm/drama. Whatever you think is best for the 'pedia is fine by me. I certainly can see that there are deeper issues that will need to be addressed in the future, and I'll help in any way that I can. Feel free to poke me on my talk page with any suggestion, corrections, or links to threads I should be aware of. I have 2 talk page threads regarding User:Daedalus969 in my archives if they would be of any help as well. I think he's open to some improvement if approached in the proper manner, but it's not something I have any experience at. Let me know if there is anything I can do. —

1808:

to request extended BLP protection. They can, of course, post comments to the talk page. Furthermore, there is not, nor should there be, a policy prohibiting admins from protecting their own pages. Exceptions to every rule and such. I fully protect all of my own talk archive pages because there is no need for them to be altered by anyone. In situations such as that, and such as Liberal Semi, when there is no reason for an IP to be able to edit it, then there should be no objection to protection that prevents it. That's my opinion on the matter.

2151:

see how it works and whether or not it's a viable process to move into project space at some point. As far as prohibiting IPs and new users from editing anything, I don't think anyone has proposed that. At least not recently. Personally, I don't think dropping IP editing would leave us with no new editors. If anything, more newly registered editors, but that's a whole other discussion. It's merely a matter of this being a trial and, personally, I wouldn't support semi-protection of the page if it were ever approved for the project space.

2110:

a while ago. After all, pages that you're the only one to ever edit, it's not that it matters, and archives, well, same, but pages that are going to be edited by other users ? There should really be a good reason to protect those. I read the rationale "This page is part of a process that anons and new users are not eligible to use, they have no need to edit it. Contact me before changing this" (yet with a lock "due to vandalism", while none happened ?), and I am baffled. How can one user, set up a process

2361: 2114:(and then, enforce it through protection) ? We, on Knowledge, have never banned anonymous and new users from participating in a process, this comes from our most sacred principles. AFD, where you need to create a page: they can participate by asking a logged-in user to create the AFD discussion. AC, whose main page has been semi-protected only after years of disruption, allows any user to make statements by procuration through the talk page or other communication means. Page creation: 1150: 2257:

policies as anyone else and (b) his pages are a regular target of vandals when unprotected. I asked what harm the protection was doing, or alternatively what benefit would be found by having someone else do it, because I believe if you ask a regular editor and administrator to change their behavior or undo an action you should be able to provide a rational explanation of why following your suggestion is the right thing to do (superior in my mind to quoting a policy page).

1793:

protect our own pages, we are inclined to interpret our reasons as sufficient even if they don't meet the letter of policy. It also has an appearance problem, since you protected your own page but would you necessarily protect mine if I asked (you probably would but that's because of a personal philosophy, this point is for all admins not you personally). I continue to be open to the idea that you espouse at

2996:(outdent) I read it. Your boilerplate also says you try to honor requests for where, when it's clear where. But no matter. I'm happy to discuss in one place or the other, but I didn't start in both places at once. You did. Try to admit that maybe you erred, once in a while, instead of remaining belligerent. Especially when it's something trivial like this. It amazes me how you are belaboring this matter. ++ 2204:, the ongoing, full protection of sensitive pages likely to attract vandalism and other harm. If editors have content worries about Lar's user page, there's nothing to stop them from talking about proposed changes here. In the thorough unlikelihood that Lar might put anything untowards there, any of almost 1000 active admins can quickly edit through the protection. I'd assume lots of 2547:. I don't know why a certain group of admins have banded together to remove information from topics concerning African and middle eastern people and history. And they "cry" Afrocentricism or Arab nationalism when you confront them about removing countless sourced information and references, and then they block you from editing on their own will simple because they are admins. 1637:

issues. (it closed the thread down early, after all) On his/her return, if the problematic behaviour continues, neutrally counsel him/her not to do it. If a few repetitions of that doesn't work, back to AN/I we go and this time I think there will be calls for a block. But hopefully he/she will take the hint. Best wishes. ++

2040:

know some admins are happy to do that by request, although I personally refuse, and remove old userpage protections if I happen to see them. Full protection of user pages is a bigger issue, and any sort of protection to user talk pages in particular is a problem. I don't think dismissing Doug is correct or helpful here.

1338:... If you just needed a copy, please let me know when you're done and I'll re-delete. If you plan to try to improve the article, good luck... if you want me to take a quick look after you're done adding information to validate the notability and reduce the "ad copy" feeling, let me know and I will. ++ 3133:

Let's just say that if I thought you were doing a good job of heeding the cautions and feedback you were given, I would not have mentioned it to you. I regret the necessity of the interjection, but it was needful. You may not agree, but be aware that at least one community member thinks this way. Now

2958:

Could have fooled me. Your replies were nothing of the sort. They never specifically asked anything, the dodged around and accused me of being disruptive for the manner in which I replied to posts. I never evaded anything, and you are wrong for labeling me of doing so. If you had a question, then

2178:

As for my user page, I have specific reasons for the full protection of it, which I prefer not to go into publicly. Do any of you questioning the protection have something specific on my user page that you feel is outside policy or that you would like to see changed? If so, please surface the concern

1807:

I've never understood why editors decide to get uppity about user pages being fully protected. That portion of the policy should be reworded. As far as the Liberal Semi page, there are project pages in Knowledge space that do not allow IP edits. The process, as Lar has designed it, does not allow IPs

54:

I recognize that this user page belongs to the Knowledge project and not to me personally. As such, I recognize that I am expected to respectfully abide by community standards as to the presentation and content of this page, and that if I do not like these guidelines, I am welcome either to engage in

2109:

As acknowledged there, user pages are part of Knowledge, and obey to the same rules, although more specific, in terms of protection. I can see why someone wants to protect a user page, especially users who are continuously attacked by vandals or harassed. I may myself have taken liberties with this,

2082:

I disagree that full protection of user pages is a big deal. I, for example, would prefer people not edit my user page. An ongoing issue with one editor, actually, but I usually just leave the changes just because. Any other changes that you or Doug or anyone else believe people have a right to make

1307:

No worries. Hang in there. Piotrus is a good person, really. Just very protective of Poland. (can't say as I blame him, Poland has been kicked around a lot, as my father personally experienced. But we have to remain NPOV and not automatically make assumptions about others based on their nationality.

2808:

the talk page history, you would see that the user which I warned was previously already warned for insertion of POV material, or unsourced additions, and was already on his last warning. I find it strange that an admin doesn't do any fact checking, when users are known to blank their talk pages.

2134:

they won't do bad things; we keep the door open and welcome constructive contributions. This page protection is not even remotely related to BLP enforcement, so this is not, even indirectly, a justification. If we disallowed anything to unregistered and new users, then it's simple: we wouldn't have

1948:

If I ever do anything that could be perceived as having any hint of COI in the use of my admin tools or otherwise, I want to be called out for it. I deserve to be called out for it. I think this smacks of COI and I'm calling Lar out. 1) we don't fully-protect userpages, 2) we don't pre-emptively

1829:

Is there reason to suppose IP editors have wished, but been unable, to edit the liberal semi page? Presumably they can comment here if they need to, right? Can you identify the harm done by Lar protecting his subpages, or what substantial benefit would accrue if he had simply asked another admin to

2239:

5) If there is an IAR reason to fully-protect Lar's page, that determination should have been made by an univolved admin, not Lar. I dont question that such a decision might exist, but there is no way that I can possibly know that the same standards are being applied to Lar's userpage as would be

2150:

As you note, several project pages that do not allow IP editing have other means for IPs to make requests. Whether it be a separate page specifically for that, or the talk page related to the respective page. This is no different. The talk page is not protected. This page is a trial. An attempt to

2039:

I think Doug has a valid point Jennavecia. Generally protected pages are not something a wiki has. Having things like protected subpages makes us more of a content host, rather then an site where anyone can edit anything. Semi-protection of a userpage, as was the case here is not so big a deal. I

1883:

for me), but it hasn't been. The policy says we don't fully protect userpages, so as an admin I am not about to fully protect a userpage for anyone, least of all for myself. I don't get to fully protect my page so long as no one can articulate a reason that they would be harmed by it. Doing so

1792:

The protection which you implemented on your own pages does not seem to be consistent with this policy. Furthermore, although I'm sure there are many admins who disagree, I don't think it's appropriate at all to execute the protection yourself. I think this is a good example of why we shouldn't

1636:

About the closure, no worries, the thread was about over anyway, given the wikibreak. It appears to me that you did as you thought best in good faith so no problem. As for Daedalus, the thing to do is to watch and wait... Taking a wikibreak can be good, but it can also be a way to try to "dodge"

3236:

I spent some time reviewing contributions. I note also that you're on review right now at your own request, which is a good thing to do from time to time (I should try it some time). I remain troubled by the original comment you made at D's page in support of templating people... as the current

2487:

restored message after removal from user J.delanoy. This is not a public article it is a private user talk page you can not remove what someone write on anothers talk page. It is interesting that J.delanoy removed this. Everytime someone mentions or report Administrtor Dbachmann the person gets

3241:

shows, it's easy to put newbies and others off with excessive use of templates, even if the templates themselves are pointing out things that are "correct" from a policy perspective. But your recent contributions (while perhaps not stylistically as I would try to do them) do not seem nearly as

1613:

Apologies if I jumped the gun on the ANI thread closing. Of course I'd defer to more experienced Wikipedians, and certainly wouldn't fuss over a revert to re-opening. I mentioned it to another admin, and he said "then just close it". I don't know if he read the thread or not, but I was just

2256:

You've raised three problems: The user page full protection, the semi-protection of user subpages, and the fact that Lar instituted protection himself. Lar is a checkuser on this project and others, and a steward. That means a couple of things: (a) we should assume he is as familiar with most

3151:

I'd be happy to take them on board; though, for this purpose, it would be necessary to elaborate a bit: What exactly makes you believe that way? What exactly do you deem a problem? I'd be truly grateful to hear your concerns; also, if you don't object, what about discussing this further per

1773:

and I noticed that it is itself semi-protected but there is not a single edit to the page by an IP; I venture to guess that there is not a single act of vandalism to the page (leaving aside our disagreement about Gurch's edit, no level of protection would protect you against that anyway).

2763:

Hi Lar, I am sorry I haven't responded sooner. As it turns out, I had the wrong e-mail account set up for Knowledge. As a result, I have received a lot of mail that I wasn't at all aware of. Regarding your latest inquiry: everything seems to be in order, thank you very much. Regards,

2502:

There is a lot of abuse of power going on in wikipedia. before this article was neutral and list all point of views, someone removed all the sources of the article including large amounts of information and refs, and turn it into this essay format of their personal beliefs

2566:... it's fine to leave this message. Cherbeat, I'm probably not going to get involved in this matter. To anyone who has been following, have there been blocks? How many pages did this user leave the message on. Is there a chance the user doesn't know better? ++ 2083:

to my userpage because this is a wiki, I'm just going to revert anyway. So protection saves me the time to revert an edit that they're saved the time of making. That aside, what talk page protection are we talking about here? User talk:Lar/Liberal Semi is not,

2179:

if you would. If not, then I don't think there is an actual issue, is there? Full protection is within policy. Further, no one has ever stopped anyone from making suggestions or raising concerns here, because this page (the talk page) is not protected,

2461:

It was more a dare to the admin-corp; see my piped link re mop-duty. The 10px is pure-wrong; html attributes are in pixels by default and explicitly giving the 'px' is a syntax error; px is for css only. Boxes look nice now ;) Cheers,

3242:

problematic as those from the time you were brought before ArbCom, and my characterisation (above) may have been somewhat overgeneral and too harsh when I said that you were not heeding the cautions given. Could you be kinder/gentler/

2183:. On the contrary I have a policy of never removing any comments except in very exceptional cases, and everything, regardless of my personal views about the comment, or the contributor, gets archived. I hope that clears matters up. ++ 1786:

User pages and subpages may be semi-protected, but not fully protected, at the user's request if there is evidence of vandalism or disruption. User talk pages are usually not semi-protected except in response to severe or continued

1682:

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank

1949:

protect pages, 3) I personally believe that we shouldn't protect our own pages, but that's a higher standard than the guideline sets. 1 and 2 are what they are, violations of policy that Lar has (3) done for himself. If that's

3803:

later... OK, add Misfit Toy Company and Baseball Monitor to that list (blocked and tagged)... can you tag the ones you reported (yes, they're likely all the same user ... please use {{sockpuppetconfirmed|Ron liebman}} to tag

1896:

must still be read in context of the protection policy. And while you disagree with the protection policy, I disagree with the Userpage guideline. All of this goes for the subpage as well, though less so because it's only

1874:

Jennavecia, my concern isn't with users having their userpages protected, it's with admins protecting their own pages when policy says we shouldn't. In other words, I might tend to agree with you that the policy should be

2320:

I've only glossed over the above thread; ya, you're free to have your user page protected. Duh. I did look at it and tweaked a few of the transcluded subpages to tidy the code. There is more that could be tidied-up; this:

1433:

He seems to have been beat-up on. I've not looked at the nitty-gritty of this, yet, and will be sure to do my homework and be careful. Wasn't planning on getting into anything with Daedalus. Gotta go; 12:42am. Cheers,

1380:

I have admonished both of you, so I do not think Jack is completely blameless. However, I do not agree with your assessment of the situation, or your wording choices. You need to, as I said, dial down the stridency.

2507:

I don't know what to call this other than racism and a certain group of admins (who always) band together to abuse their power (mainly, Paul Barlow (who is obessed with aryan race and racial topics), Dougweller and

1745:

Why does this sound familiar? Are you sure someone might not be looking into this already? :) I daresay my interest has been tweaked but I'm not sure there's a lot of, ahem, "action items" here for me.

1678: 2278:

An anon turned up here... (in my view, and that of others, likely someone I already know who chooses not to reveal themselves, for doing so would make the very point they argued against) but my wife

1254:

I knew you'd like it and am not too surprised that you discovered it some time ago. I've read all of Rand, too. The Steinbeck is also something I'm sure you'll like. The others above are all great;

2126:: anonymous votes are not counted, those from new users are generally viewed as suspect and discarded, but they are still free to comment. Editing anything: they can, unless the page is protected 1797:(I have concerns but I am not downright opposed like Gurch), but I do think that you need to unprotect your pages and request semi-protection only if you are faced with recurrent vandalism.-- 2959:

ask it and stop dodging around yourself. To the question, maybe you should try reading my talk page edit notice. I try to respond elsewhere as that is the habit I adopted from Gogo Dodo,

1927:

Right, but you're the one ringing the bell. So is there a specific reason the circumstances of these protections are an issue for you, or is this simply policy wonkery? (or is it wonking?)

3314: 2937:

My replys all have been about why you posted here, and nothing else. I guess the threads have forked. But you have failed to address why you answered me on your own user page first,

2130:. Of course, there are plenty of processes that anons almost never use, others partially restricted due to repeated abuse, but it's no reason to restrict without good cause, as we 2021:

Doug, you're "calling me out" ????? As in wet noodles at 30 paces? OK, then... Have your second contact my second and we'll make arrangements... More seriously, check your mail. ++

123: 1982:

Okay. I just wanted to confirm that you're calling him out solely for breaking a policy, rather than because there's an actual issue that may have arisen from the protections.

1416:

Eh? I see you offering to give Jay pointers. Is that wise? I think you need to not interact with Daedalus969 at all... best to steer clear of situations that are high drama. ++

2427:

I'm not sure I agree that the width should be changed away from px. I do everything in px. I did do a || edit to how you changed Liberal Semi... Thanks for the suggestions. ++

1443:

Yes he does seem to perhaps have been (more digging would be needed to tell for sure). I just urge caution, you need to stay productive and out of the dramahs. Sleep well. ++

76:. Please do not comment here, use my current talk page for that, thanks. It is part of a series of archives, see the box at right for the list and to navigate to others. 2880:

Seems you just love assuming crap, don't you? In case you are having trouble, I said that I would reply here in my talk page edit notice. It's a habit I adopted from

3307: 2902:

You posted your reply to me on your own page first, at 21:44, then you posted here as well, later. Pick one or the other. Preferably the one you started with first. ++

2603:

Absolutely not, please do! In fact you needn't have asked first. Perhaps I need to make that clearer in the forest of verbiage that encrusts my user pages? :) ++

3405: 1986:. The encyclopedia that anyone can edit has some pages that not everyone should be editing. I'm off to work now, so I'll let someone else take it from here. 2243:

6) I think splitting the discussion will cause more confusion but I have already said to discuss wherever Lar wants, so I'll comment on the subpage there.--

1706:

If you might know anyone with a sensitivty to BLP issues, a talk page which is relatively widely watched, and whose interest may be tweaked by looking at a

3371: 3678: 3496: 2641: 2171:

I am confused, I think it would be best to separate the discussion to reduce that confusion, wouldn't it? I suggest discussing the protection status of

1460:

Thanks. My note seems to have been ignored. I may still look at the backstory but you seem to have had a look-see already and things seem in good hands;

2884:. If you have as much a problem with it as you say you do, take it up with him instead of just me, like you have been with your stalking of my edits.— 1906:

BTW, I see the message twice as well and the edit protection messages too; but I see that currently everywhere. I'm using Firefox on a MacBook, FWIW.--

3798:? Also, for background, wasn't ChrisO just mentioned in an arbitration case? I have to ask, is a CU really necessary? Block on behaviour comes to mind. 3347: 3042: 1056: 3334: 2941:

turned up here too. Try to answer direct questions instead of evading them, it's an amazingly effective way of improving people's opinion of you. ++

2232:

4) I don't have to point to a reason that it shouldn't be protected, the policy is the reason, and we constantly preach to users that they don't

3398: 1564:

Good morning. I'm quite please with it. I've been nosing about the other portals and have started pushing them in the right direction. Cheers,

3735: 3587: 3462: 2532:

calls the people who confront them about his wrong doing "afrocentrics" and "Persian nationalists" but he is to one pushing his racist ideas

3867:

Right, I knew that. My question just is why liebman is interested in ChrisO. Baseball Bugs I get the connection. Idle curiousity I guess. ++

1233:. The other one I don't know. Never a big fan of Steinbeck, actually, but it sounds interesting enough... kind of dreary sounding though. ++ 2489: 109: 3553: 3179:

I'd rather not do email in this particular case. I'm about to go out but I will reply in more detail later... Thanks for your openness. ++

1730:

floating around behind the scenes. I may try and work something out, but it's definitely one for the wise to watch, I reckon.... cheers,

3671: 3489: 1158: 2637: 1582: 1505: 1511: 3644: 2973: 2929: 2894: 2855: 2819: 1517:

There are a bunch of changes in there, the key one being the larger links orbiting the logo; compare their on-hover behaviour with:

1371: 3438: 1530:

The others will likely get the same treatment over time. The overall effort is to move the portal design to the next thing (TBD).

1335: 3134:

that you are aware of that sentiment, perhaps you can take it on board. Or perhaps agreeing to disagree will have to suffice. ++

3089:, (which includes me) is that you heed the cautions and feedback you were given. Are you pretty confident you are doing that? ++ 3857: 3783: 116: 3580: 3425: 2341:

as 'px' is for css only. Of course, I'd be inclined to adjust that whole table-layout scheme. The signpost thing could use a

3711: 3529: 3295: 1223: 3698: 3516: 2201: 1778: 1577: 80: 1892:

does say "Administrators may protect their own user pages when appropriate" but that others should file at RFPP, but

1361:

It's completely unacceptable to ask someone what they're problem is when they clearly have an axe to grind. Right.—

1794: 3620: 3876: 3830: 3813: 3255: 3228: 3188: 3143: 3098: 3054: 3005: 2950: 2911: 2872: 2837: 2790: 2749: 2684: 2667: 2612: 2575: 2453: 2436: 2380: 2295: 2192: 2066: 2030: 1755: 1646: 1552: 1452: 1425: 1390: 1347: 1242: 1197: 84: 3386: 2919:

You posted a reply here as well. Your own set of choices is presented to you as well. Pick one or the other.—

3153: 2229:

3) Exactly where does any policy say you can fully protect a userpage; I read it to specifically say you can't.

1735: 1324: 1022: 1012: 1002: 992: 982: 963: 953: 943: 933: 923: 904: 894: 884: 874: 864: 854: 844: 834: 824: 814: 804: 794: 775: 765: 755: 745: 735: 725: 705: 695: 685: 675: 665: 646: 636: 626: 616: 606: 596: 586: 576: 566: 556: 546: 536: 517: 507: 497: 487: 477: 467: 457: 447: 437: 427: 417: 407: 397: 387: 377: 367: 348: 338: 328: 318: 308: 298: 288: 278: 268: 258: 248: 238: 40: 28: 2493: 1149: 1032: 3659: 3477: 3246:? Maybe, but so could we all. I hope that is helpful, and I would welcome further discourse if you wished. ++ 3238: 2286:, I'd revert back. But if anyone thinks I'm going to edit war with my wife, they are clearly confused. :) ++ 228: 218: 208: 198: 188: 178: 168: 158: 148: 3821:

actually I think I tagged them all but do check my work. Not sure a rangeblock will do any good here... ++

3607: 2563: 2390: 2283: 1320: 1319:

Hello, could you give me a temporary link to my deleted article called "SmartPPC EVO"? Thanks in advance.

3568: 2970: 2926: 2891: 2852: 2816: 2552: 2360: 2346: 2172: 1770: 1711: 1368: 1298: 1283: 1727: 2160: 2096: 1995: 1938: 1856: 1817: 1623: 2087:, protected. If we're just talking about it in general, there are probably more appropriate places. 1543:

I don't have any rare browsers, but I did take a look and I like it. Well done, good improvement. ++

3855: 3781: 2729: 2548: 2364: 2345:

in a wrapper div or some such mechanism. A little while ago, I tweaked the two boxes @ top-left on

2213: 1731: 1659: 1512:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)#Seeking eyeballs; odd browsers and platforms, especially welcome

1110: 1051: 3842: 3838: 2771: 2463: 2419: 2350: 2349:

and your user page has copies that would benefit from the same nudges. Enjoy da bricks — Cheers,

2140: 1723: 1707: 1691: 1599: 1589: 1565: 1534: 1465: 1435: 1407: 1259: 1132: 1125: 2535:

Just as he went and made unexplained edits by removing a large amount of information from this

2524:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Ancient_Egyptian_race_controversy

2523: 2515: 3110:

more — your unnecessary and off-topic allusion in the first place did disappoint/sadden me. —

2624: 2593: 2048: 1173: 3207: 3167: 3121: 3073: 3029: 2965: 2921: 2886: 2847: 2811: 2706: 2650: 2310: 2263: 1836: 1363: 1294: 1279: 1103: 3219:

Have not forgotten about this, just have been very busy. Sorry for delay in responding. ++

2504: 2152: 2088: 1987: 1930: 1848: 1809: 1618: 55:

reasonable discussion about it, to publish my material elsewhere, or to leave the project.

3764:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special%3AAbuseLog&wpSearchFilter=140

2828:

Did you want to discuss this at your talk page or here? Please pick one or the other. ++

2520:

Making about racism when it wasn’t they can get their admin friends to back them up or

1588:

The fix is in-hand and awaiting a sync. I really, really, don't miss Microsoft. Cheers,

3846: 3772: 3290: 3243: 2881: 2724: 2209: 1655: 1726:

currently sheds a rather glowing light on the subject, about whom there seems to be a

3872: 3826: 3809: 3795: 3251: 3224: 3184: 3139: 3094: 3050: 3001: 2946: 2907: 2868: 2833: 2786: 2766: 2745: 2680: 2663: 2608: 2571: 2449: 2432: 2376: 2291: 2205: 2188: 2136: 2131: 2123: 2115: 2062: 2026: 1983: 1929:

For the duplicate messages, I don't see anything duplicated. I'm using FF3 on Vista.

1830:

do it? (P.S. Lar: Your editnote of "Welcome to the talk page of Lar" appears twice.)

1751: 1687: 1654:

I'm so hoping Daedalus will stop and think about the outcomes he's been stirring up.

1642: 1548: 1448: 1421: 1400: 1386: 1343: 1238: 1193: 1115: 65: 17: 3196:

Okay then, that's fine with me. Also, you're welcome. Many thanks for your help, —

2621: 2590: 2236:

their userpages; particularly at MFD where I've spent a lot of my time in the past.

2233: 2119: 2041: 1889: 1885: 1715: 1169: 1401:

wp:ani#Continued incivility and baseless accusations from User:Jayhawk of Justice

3197: 3157: 3111: 3063: 3019: 2701: 2645: 2516:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Ham.2C_son_of_Noah

2305: 2258: 2057:

To clarify, my user page is full protected, not semi, and has been for years. ++

1880: 1847:

Re: your PS, I only see it once. Clear your cookies... or cache... or whatever.

1831: 1719: 1227: 1120: 1769:

Lar, During the recent discussion on Gurch's page I was taking a close look at

3879: 3862: 3833: 3816: 3788: 3258: 3231: 3214: 3191: 3174: 3146: 3128: 3101: 3080: 3057: 3036: 3008: 2976: 2953: 2932: 2914: 2897: 2875: 2858: 2840: 2822: 2793: 2775: 2752: 2734: 2708: 2687: 2670: 2652: 2628: 2615: 2597: 2578: 2556: 2497: 2466: 2456: 2439: 2422: 2383: 2353: 2312: 2298: 2265: 2247: 2217: 2195: 2165: 2144: 2101: 2069: 2050: 2033: 2000: 1957: 1943: 1910: 1901: 1861: 1838: 1822: 1801: 1758: 1739: 1695: 1663: 1649: 1630: 1602: 1592: 1568: 1555: 1537: 1468: 1455: 1438: 1428: 1410: 1393: 1374: 1350: 1328: 1302: 1287: 1262: 1245: 1200: 1177: 1135: 2538: 2403: 2244: 1954: 1907: 1898: 1798: 1486: 1230: 2367:... even if I didn't understand the need to do everything you did, Jack. ( 3381: 3868: 3822: 3805: 3247: 3220: 3180: 3135: 3090: 3046: 2997: 2942: 2903: 2864: 2829: 2782: 2741: 2676: 2659: 2604: 2567: 2445: 2428: 2372: 2287: 2184: 2058: 2022: 1747: 1638: 1544: 1444: 1417: 1382: 1339: 1234: 1189: 2402:; the above “width” tweak is line 45 of the current page (and will make 2845:

It would be easier to do this at my own talk page, if you don't mind.—

1258:

by Burroughs (Sellevision) is hilarious. Trumbo is quite grim. Cheers,

3654: 3472: 973: 914: 785: 656: 527: 358: 139: 2562:

J.delanoy and Majorly, it's cool... Thanks for the reverts but per

2226:

2) I do give a lot of AGF to Lar, that doesn't mean I can't say WTF.

3763: 2863:

So why did you even post anything here? Seems counterproductive. ++

2135:

any new editor, and Knowledge would die out in a matter of months.

1069:

All dates approximate, conversations organised by thread start date

79:

An index to all my talk page archives, automatically maintained by

2304:

Your TPWs probably came to the same conclusion, I know I did ;-)

2444:

PS, note, next time you can just ask me to make the change :) ++

2399: 1493: 1185: 3762:

If you need/want to, you can probably find more if you look at

3563: 1099:

You liked those? The actual books are certainly worth reading.

1672:

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

3106:

Yes, I am. And that's why your foreseeable answer and — even

1226:

from memory. :) Or used to be able to anyway. It's kind of a

3845:

is an impersonator. Thanks for running the check for me.

2723:

Lol.. serves me right for checking an "easy one" ;-). --

2700:

Thanks - sorry for inadvertently causing duplicate work!

2505:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Ancient_Egyptian_race_controversy

1106:

for a week and will be getting me some books, including:

2208:

as to why Lar might have fully protected his user page.

3757: 3754: 3751: 3748: 3745: 3729: 3722: 3718: 3705: 3691: 3685: 3665: 3638: 3631: 3627: 3614: 3600: 3594: 3574: 3547: 3540: 3536: 3523: 3509: 3503: 3483: 3456: 3449: 3445: 3432: 3418: 3412: 3392: 3365: 3358: 3354: 3341: 3327: 3321: 3301: 2805: 2411: 2407: 2279: 2084: 1774:

Additionally, your main user page is full-protected.

1275: 1142: 1094: 1092: 1090: 2620:

Nah - just making sure you were around. Email coming.

2223:

1) Any reference to user talk space was a typo, sorry.

2543:

when Paul barlow mentioned it to both Dougweller and

2514:

The same people went and created on the norice board

1722:, and getting paid. The wiki shenanigans aside, the 3794:

I'l take a look when I get a chance. But what about

1464:. I'm off to meta and ws for a bit anyways. Cheers, 2539:http://en.wikipedia.org/Black_(hieroglyphic_'km') 1953:, whatever, but it's still violation of policy.-- 3208: 3198: 3168: 3158: 3122: 3112: 3074: 3064: 3030: 3020: 1583:m:Talk:Www.wikipedia.org template#Orbiting links 1506:m:Talk:Www.wikipedia.org template#Orbiting links 2961:or didn't you take the time to read that reply? 1522: 1494: 1222:Jack: I probably can recite long passages of 117: 8: 2175:on that page's talk page, rather than here. 1042: 2589:Do you mind if I email you, RE: checkuser? 283:1 September 2006 through 15 September 2006 124: 110: 2202:clearly allows, in a non-exclusionary way 1141:Sometimes Larry, you can be such a drag. 1037:1 January 2023 through 1 January 2025 ?? 392:1 February 2007 through 15 February 2007 343:1 December 2006 through 15 December 2006 333:15 November 2006 through 1 December 2006 323:1 November 2006 through 15 November 2006 293:15 September 2006 through 1 October 2006 2128:in accordance with the protection policy 1278:, Lar. I'm doing my best for this case. 1007:1 December 2016 through 1 December 2018 997:1 December 2013 through 1 December 2016 987:1 December 2012 through 1 December 2013 899:1 November 2010 through 1 December 2010 879:1 September 2010 through 1 October 2010 770:1 November 2009 through 1 December 2009 750:1 September 2009 through 1 October 2009 641:1 November 2008 through 1 December 2008 621:1 September 2008 through 1 October 2008 512:1 November 2007 through 1 December 2007 492:1 September 2007 through 1 October 2007 382:15 January 2007 through 1 February 2007 353:15 December 2006 through 1 January 2007 313:15 October 2006 through 1 November 2006 273:15 August 2006 through 1 September 2006 2781:No worries. Glad I was able to help. ++ 2317:Well I sure wasn't gonna revert her ; ) 1686:This has been an automated delivery by 1017:1 December 2018 through 1 January 2021 928:1 January 2011 through 1 February 2011 909:1 December 2010 through 1 January 2011 889:1 October 2010 through 1 November 2010 869:1 August 2010 through 1 September 2010 799:1 January 2010 through 1 February 2010 780:1 December 2009 through 1 January 2010 760:1 October 2009 through 1 November 2009 740:1 August 2009 through 1 September 2009 670:1 January 2009 through 1 February 2009 651:1 December 2008 through 1 January 2009 631:1 October 2008 through 1 November 2008 611:1 August 2008 through 1 September 2008 541:1 January 2008 through 1 February 2008 522:1 December 2007 through 1 January 2008 502:1 October 2007 through 1 November 2007 482:1 August 2007 through 1 September 2007 372:1 January 2007 through 15 January 2007 303:1 October 2006 through 15 October 2006 3841:was mentioned in an arbitration case. 1779:Knowledge:Protection_policy#User_pages 1027:1 January 2021 through 1 January 2023 402:15 February 2007 through 1 March 2007 50: 938:1 February 2011 through 1 March 2011 809:1 February 2010 through 1 March 2010 680:1 February 2009 through 1 March 2009 551:1 February 2008 through 1 March 2008 263:1 August 2006 through 15 August 2006 7: 3062:Oh yes, which was to be expected. — 2740:Neener neener, you missed one. :) ++ 2488:blocked like you did to this editor 968:1 May 2011 through 1 December 2012 432:15 March 2007 through 1 April 2007 412:1 March 2007 through 15 March 2007 253:15 July 2006 through 1 August 2006 1777:I am concerned about this because 1315:Please, help to restore my article 948:1 March 2011 through 1 April 2011 859:1 July 2010 through 1 August 2010 819:1 March 2010 through 1 April 2010 730:1 July 2009 through 1 August 2009 690:1 March 2009 through 1 April 2009 601:1 July 2008 through 1 August 2008 561:1 March 2008 through 1 April 2008 472:1 July 2007 through 1 August 2007 24: 2410:bonus, the boxes fix would be to 1879:("reworded" is just a little too 243:1 July 2006 through 15 July 2006 233:15 June 2006 through 1 July 2006 223:1 June 2006 through 15 June 2006 2359: 1578:m:File:Orbiting links on IE6.jpg 1336:User:Dariakovalchuk/SmartPPC EVO 1148: 958:1 April 2011 through 1 May 2011 849:1 June 2010 through 1 July 2010 829:1 April 2010 through 1 May 2010 720:1 June 2009 through 1 July 2009 700:1 April 2009 through 1 May 2009 591:1 June 2008 through 1 July 2008 571:1 April 2008 through 1 May 2008 462:1 June 2007 through 1 July 2007 442:1 April 2007 through 1 May 2007 213:15 May 2006 through 1 June 2006 153:start through about 22 Jan 2006 3085:"Expected"? What the community 2644:when you get a chance? Thanks, 839:1 May 2010 through 1 June 2010 710:1 May 2009 through 1 June 2009 581:1 May 2008 through 1 June 2008 452:1 May 2007 through 1 June 2007 203:1 May 2006 through 15 May 2006 193:15 Apr 2006 through 1 May 2006 183:1 Apr 2006 through 15 Apr 2006 163:22 Jan 2006 through 1 Mar 2006 1059:(27 Dec 2005) through present 422:Trentino — South Tyrol topics 173:1 Mar 2006 through 1 Apr 2006 1: 1765:Protection of your user pages 2371:explain it! :) ) Thanks! ++ 2640:, could you take a look at 1485:…are now live. No, not the 977:My post 2012 archived talk 918:My 2011/2012 archived talk 90: 81:User:HBC Archive Indexerbot 3902: 3291:Michelle swanson (housing) 1795:User talk:Lar/Liberal Semi 1215:— 03:40, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 3880:20:36, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 3863:20:08, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 3834:19:30, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 3817:19:21, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 3789:17:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 3232:17:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 3215:00:02, 27 June 2009 (UTC) 3192:23:58, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 3175:23:56, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 3147:23:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 3129:23:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 3102:23:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 3081:23:20, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 3058:23:16, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 3037:23:12, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 3009:23:16, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 2977:23:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 2954:23:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 2933:22:56, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 2915:22:54, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 2898:22:45, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 2876:22:37, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 2859:22:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 2841:22:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 2823:22:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 2794:03:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 2776:20:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 2753:16:28, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 2735:16:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 2709:16:34, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 2688:16:26, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 2671:16:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 2653:16:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 2629:13:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 2616:13:14, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 2598:06:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 2579:05:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC) 2557:17:48, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 2498:20:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 2467:14:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC) 2457:13:54, 21 June 2009 (UTC) 2440:13:50, 21 June 2009 (UTC) 2423:09:46, 21 June 2009 (UTC) 2384:13:59, 20 June 2009 (UTC) 2354:13:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC) 2331:would be better as this: 2313:12:39, 19 June 2009 (UTC) 2299:06:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC) 2266:18:08, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 2248:11:36, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 2240:applied to other editors. 2218:10:51, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 2196:05:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 2166:04:18, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 2145:03:25, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 2112:and decide who can use it 2102:04:17, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 2070:05:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 2051:02:06, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 2034:01:08, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 2001:00:36, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 1958:00:18, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 1944:00:04, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 1911:00:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 1902:23:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC) 1862:22:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC) 1839:22:48, 14 June 2009 (UTC) 1823:22:44, 14 June 2009 (UTC) 1802:22:23, 14 June 2009 (UTC) 1759:11:12, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 1740:05:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 1523:http://www.wikiquote.org/ 1495:http://www.wikipedia.org/ 1481:my edits to the main page 1351:05:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC) 1329:14:15, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 1308:Good assumptions OR bad.) 1045: 976: 917: 788: 659: 530: 361: 142: 98: 85:User:Lar/TalkArchiveIndex 3259:17:39, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 2804:Lar, if you bothered to 1696:03:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC) 1664:19:54, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 1650:18:55, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 1631:18:36, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 1603:13:42, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1593:12:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1569:11:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 1556:11:04, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 1538:06:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 1469:04:47, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 1456:16:53, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1439:16:42, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1429:16:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1411:13:42, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1394:03:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 1375:19:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 1303:14:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 1288:17:08, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 1263:03:40, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 1246:17:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 1201:17:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 1178:17:18, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 1136:07:18, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 3239:Knowledge:Civility/Poll 2398:( Lar would seem to be 1102:A friend of mine is in 3769:Thanks for your time. 3018:I am sure. Regards, — 2564:User:Lar/Eeyore policy 2284:User:Lar/Eeyore policy 1790: 1501:The discussion is at: 789:My 2010 archived talk 660:My 2009 archived talk 531:My 2008 archived talk 362:My 2007 archived talk 143:My 2006 archived talk 64:This is an archive of 2414:starting at line 6 ;) 2406:happy); for an extra 2347:User:Lar/Liberal Semi 2173:User:Lar/Liberal Semi 1783: 1771:User:Lar/Liberal Semi 1712:may have been written 2085:nor has it ever been 1718:moonlighting with a 3744:are all socks. See 1598:All fixed; Cheers, 1276:Thank you very much 1111:Sellevision (novel) 3843:User:ChrisO (talk) 2704: 2675:sigh. Too slow. ++ 2648: 2636:Since you handled 2308: 2261: 2200:Protection policy 1834: 1728:little controversy 1716:oversighter / crat 1126:Johnny Got His Gun 101:Talk Page Archives 3283:checkuser request 2702: 2646: 2626: 2595: 2306: 2259: 1897:semi-protected.-- 1832: 1698: 1629: 1293:Thanks, Lar. :-) 1164: 1078: 1077: 1074: 1073: 1063: 1062: 1041: 1040: 972: 971: 913: 912: 784: 783: 655: 654: 526: 525: 357: 356: 134: 133: 3893: 3853: 3779: 3740: 3738: 3701: 3681: 3679:deleted contribs 3657: 3649: 3647: 3610: 3590: 3588:deleted contribs 3566: 3558: 3556: 3519: 3499: 3497:deleted contribs 3475: 3467: 3465: 3428: 3408: 3406:deleted contribs 3384: 3382:Data restoration 3376: 3374: 3337: 3317: 3315:deleted contribs 3293: 3212: 3206: 3202: 3172: 3166: 3162: 3126: 3120: 3116: 3078: 3072: 3068: 3034: 3028: 3024: 2968: 2924: 2889: 2850: 2814: 2769: 2732: 2727: 2625: 2594: 2415: 2412:repeat this edit 2394: 2363: 2282:. Normally, per 2163: 2158: 2099: 2094: 2046: 1998: 1993: 1941: 1936: 1894:when appropriate 1859: 1854: 1820: 1815: 1685: 1628: 1626: 1615: 1525: 1497: 1366: 1155: 1152: 1043: 974: 915: 786: 657: 528: 359: 140: 126: 119: 112: 96: 95: 92: 91: 83:can be found at 48: 47: 3901: 3900: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3860: 3847: 3786: 3773: 3714: 3694: 3674: 3653: 3652: 3623: 3603: 3583: 3562: 3561: 3532: 3512: 3492: 3471: 3470: 3441: 3421: 3401: 3380: 3379: 3350: 3330: 3310: 3289: 3288: 3285: 3204: 3164: 3118: 3070: 3026: 3016: 2966: 2922: 2887: 2848: 2812: 2802: 2765: 2761: 2730: 2725: 2721: 2587: 2485: 2397: 2388: 2276: 2161: 2153: 2097: 2089: 2042: 2019: 2017:calling me out? 1996: 1988: 1939: 1931: 1888:. By the way, 1857: 1849: 1818: 1810: 1767: 1704: 1674: 1624: 1616: 1611: 1521: 1483: 1364: 1359: 1317: 1273: 1180: 1166: 1087: 1046:RfA Thank Yous 130: 103: 58: 45: 44: 37: 32: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3899: 3897: 3889: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3858: 3800: 3799: 3784: 3742: 3741: 3650: 3559: 3468: 3377: 3284: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3237:discussion at 3015: 3012: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2882:User:Gogo Dodo 2801: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2760: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2720: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2586: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2490:129.10.244.102 2484: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2416: 2395: 2344: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2318: 2315: 2275: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2251: 2250: 2241: 2237: 2230: 2227: 2224: 2169: 2168: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2018: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1951:policy wonkery 1928: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1904: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1842: 1841: 1826: 1825: 1766: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1732:Privatemusings 1703: 1702:just wondering 1700: 1684: 1679:May 2009 issue 1673: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1610: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1586: 1585: 1580: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1559: 1558: 1528: 1527: 1526:and the others 1515: 1514: 1509: 1499: 1498: 1482: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1404: 1403: 1397: 1396: 1358: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1321:Dariakovalchuk 1316: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1272: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1249: 1248: 1224:Harsh Mistress 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1167: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1129: 1128: 1123: 1118: 1113: 1097: 1096: 1086: 1083: 1081: 1079: 1076: 1075: 1072: 1071: 1065: 1064: 1061: 1060: 1054: 1048: 1047: 1039: 1038: 1035: 1029: 1028: 1025: 1019: 1018: 1015: 1009: 1008: 1005: 999: 998: 995: 989: 988: 985: 979: 978: 970: 969: 966: 960: 959: 956: 950: 949: 946: 940: 939: 936: 930: 929: 926: 920: 919: 911: 910: 907: 901: 900: 897: 891: 890: 887: 881: 880: 877: 871: 870: 867: 861: 860: 857: 851: 850: 847: 841: 840: 837: 831: 830: 827: 821: 820: 817: 811: 810: 807: 801: 800: 797: 791: 790: 782: 781: 778: 772: 771: 768: 762: 761: 758: 752: 751: 748: 742: 741: 738: 732: 731: 728: 722: 721: 718: 712: 711: 708: 702: 701: 698: 692: 691: 688: 682: 681: 678: 672: 671: 668: 662: 661: 653: 652: 649: 643: 642: 639: 633: 632: 629: 623: 622: 619: 613: 612: 609: 603: 602: 599: 593: 592: 589: 583: 582: 579: 573: 572: 569: 563: 562: 559: 553: 552: 549: 543: 542: 539: 533: 532: 524: 523: 520: 514: 513: 510: 504: 503: 500: 494: 493: 490: 484: 483: 480: 474: 473: 470: 464: 463: 460: 454: 453: 450: 444: 443: 440: 434: 433: 430: 424: 423: 420: 414: 413: 410: 404: 403: 400: 394: 393: 390: 384: 383: 380: 374: 373: 370: 364: 363: 355: 354: 351: 345: 344: 341: 335: 334: 331: 325: 324: 321: 315: 314: 311: 305: 304: 301: 295: 294: 291: 285: 284: 281: 275: 274: 271: 265: 264: 261: 255: 254: 251: 245: 244: 241: 235: 234: 231: 225: 224: 221: 215: 214: 211: 205: 204: 201: 195: 194: 191: 185: 184: 181: 175: 174: 171: 165: 164: 161: 155: 154: 151: 145: 144: 136: 135: 132: 131: 129: 128: 121: 114: 106: 104: 99: 89: 72:through about 62: 60: 51: 46: 38: 33: 26: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3898: 3881: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3861: 3856: 3854: 3851: 3844: 3840: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3832: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3815: 3811: 3807: 3802: 3801: 3797: 3793: 3792: 3791: 3790: 3787: 3782: 3780: 3777: 3770: 3767: 3765: 3760: 3758: 3755: 3752: 3749: 3746: 3737: 3734: 3731: 3728: 3724: 3720: 3717: 3713: 3710: 3707: 3704: 3700: 3697: 3693: 3690: 3687: 3684: 3680: 3677: 3673: 3670: 3667: 3664: 3661: 3656: 3655:ChrisO (talk) 3651: 3646: 3643: 3640: 3637: 3633: 3629: 3626: 3622: 3619: 3616: 3613: 3609: 3606: 3602: 3599: 3596: 3593: 3589: 3586: 3582: 3579: 3576: 3573: 3570: 3565: 3560: 3555: 3552: 3549: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3535: 3531: 3528: 3525: 3522: 3518: 3515: 3511: 3508: 3505: 3502: 3498: 3495: 3491: 3488: 3485: 3482: 3479: 3474: 3473:Baseball Desk 3469: 3464: 3461: 3458: 3455: 3451: 3447: 3444: 3440: 3437: 3434: 3431: 3427: 3424: 3420: 3417: 3414: 3411: 3407: 3404: 3400: 3397: 3394: 3391: 3388: 3383: 3378: 3373: 3370: 3367: 3364: 3360: 3356: 3353: 3349: 3346: 3343: 3340: 3336: 3333: 3329: 3326: 3323: 3320: 3316: 3313: 3309: 3306: 3303: 3300: 3297: 3292: 3287: 3286: 3282: 3260: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3240: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3213: 3211: 3203: 3201: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3173: 3171: 3163: 3161: 3156:? Regards, — 3155: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3127: 3125: 3117: 3115: 3109: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3079: 3077: 3069: 3067: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3056: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3035: 3033: 3025: 3023: 3013: 3011: 3010: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2978: 2975: 2974: 2972: 2969: 2962: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2931: 2930: 2928: 2925: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2896: 2895: 2893: 2890: 2883: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2857: 2856: 2854: 2851: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2821: 2820: 2818: 2815: 2807: 2799: 2795: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2773: 2768: 2758: 2754: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2733: 2728: 2718: 2710: 2707: 2705: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2689: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2651: 2649: 2643: 2639: 2630: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2596: 2592: 2584: 2580: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2541: 2540: 2536: 2533: 2531: 2526: 2525: 2521: 2518: 2517: 2512: 2511: 2506: 2500: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2482: 2468: 2465: 2464:Jack Merridew 2460: 2459: 2458: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2421: 2420:Jack Merridew 2417: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2396: 2392: 2391:editprotected 2387: 2386: 2385: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2352: 2351:Jack Merridew 2348: 2343:clear: right; 2342: 2340: 2335:|width="10"| 2334: 2333: 2332: 2330: 2325:|width=10px| 2324: 2323: 2322: 2319: 2316: 2314: 2311: 2309: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2280:reverted them 2273: 2267: 2264: 2262: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2249: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2235: 2231: 2228: 2225: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2198: 2197: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2176: 2174: 2167: 2164: 2159: 2156: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2103: 2100: 2095: 2092: 2086: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2071: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2049: 2047: 2045: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2016: 2002: 1999: 1994: 1991: 1985: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1959: 1956: 1952: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1942: 1937: 1934: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1912: 1909: 1905: 1903: 1900: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1882: 1878: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1863: 1860: 1855: 1852: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1840: 1837: 1835: 1828: 1827: 1824: 1821: 1816: 1813: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1800: 1796: 1789: 1788: 1782: 1780: 1775: 1772: 1764: 1760: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1708:corporate bio 1701: 1699: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1681: 1680: 1671: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1627: 1621: 1620: 1608: 1604: 1601: 1600:Jack Merridew 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1591: 1590:Jack Merridew 1584: 1581: 1579: 1576: 1575: 1570: 1567: 1566:Jack Merridew 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1557: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1536: 1535:Jack Merridew 1531: 1524: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1513: 1510: 1507: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1496: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1488: 1480: 1470: 1467: 1466:Jack Merridew 1463: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1437: 1436:Jack Merridew 1432: 1431: 1430: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1409: 1408:Jack Merridew 1402: 1399: 1398: 1395: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1373: 1372: 1370: 1367: 1356: 1352: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1334:Userified to 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1314: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1270: 1264: 1261: 1260:Jack Merridew 1257: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1247: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1220: 1214: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1202: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1165: 1163: 1162: 1160: 1153: 1151: 1143: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1133:Jack Merridew 1127: 1124: 1122: 1119: 1117: 1114: 1112: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1105: 1100: 1095: 1093: 1091: 1089: 1088: 1085:da moon theme 1084: 1082: 1070: 1067: 1066: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1049: 1044: 1036: 1034: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1024: 1021: 1020: 1016: 1014: 1011: 1010: 1006: 1004: 1001: 1000: 996: 994: 991: 990: 986: 984: 981: 980: 975: 967: 965: 962: 961: 957: 955: 952: 951: 947: 945: 942: 941: 937: 935: 932: 931: 927: 925: 922: 921: 916: 908: 906: 903: 902: 898: 896: 893: 892: 888: 886: 883: 882: 878: 876: 873: 872: 868: 866: 863: 862: 858: 856: 853: 852: 848: 846: 843: 842: 838: 836: 833: 832: 828: 826: 823: 822: 818: 816: 813: 812: 808: 806: 803: 802: 798: 796: 793: 792: 787: 779: 777: 774: 773: 769: 767: 764: 763: 759: 757: 754: 753: 749: 747: 744: 743: 739: 737: 734: 733: 729: 727: 724: 723: 719: 717: 714: 713: 709: 707: 704: 703: 699: 697: 694: 693: 689: 687: 684: 683: 679: 677: 674: 673: 669: 667: 664: 663: 658: 650: 648: 645: 644: 640: 638: 635: 634: 630: 628: 625: 624: 620: 618: 615: 614: 610: 608: 605: 604: 600: 598: 595: 594: 590: 588: 585: 584: 580: 578: 575: 574: 570: 568: 565: 564: 560: 558: 555: 554: 550: 548: 545: 544: 540: 538: 535: 534: 529: 521: 519: 516: 515: 511: 509: 506: 505: 501: 499: 496: 495: 491: 489: 486: 485: 481: 479: 476: 475: 471: 469: 466: 465: 461: 459: 456: 455: 451: 449: 446: 445: 441: 439: 436: 435: 431: 429: 426: 425: 421: 419: 416: 415: 411: 409: 406: 405: 401: 399: 396: 395: 391: 389: 386: 385: 381: 379: 376: 375: 371: 369: 366: 365: 360: 352: 350: 347: 346: 342: 340: 337: 336: 332: 330: 327: 326: 322: 320: 317: 316: 312: 310: 307: 306: 302: 300: 297: 296: 292: 290: 287: 286: 282: 280: 277: 276: 272: 270: 267: 266: 262: 260: 257: 256: 252: 250: 247: 246: 242: 240: 237: 236: 232: 230: 227: 226: 222: 220: 217: 216: 212: 210: 207: 206: 202: 200: 197: 196: 192: 190: 187: 186: 182: 180: 177: 176: 172: 170: 167: 166: 162: 160: 157: 156: 152: 150: 147: 146: 141: 138: 137: 127: 122: 120: 115: 113: 108: 107: 105: 102: 97: 94: 93: 88: 86: 82: 77: 75: 71: 67: 66:User talk:Lar 61: 57: 56: 49: 42: 36: 30: 19: 18:User talk:Lar 3849: 3775: 3771: 3768: 3761: 3743: 3732: 3726: 3715: 3708: 3702: 3695: 3688: 3682: 3675: 3668: 3662: 3641: 3635: 3624: 3617: 3611: 3604: 3597: 3591: 3584: 3577: 3571: 3550: 3544: 3533: 3526: 3520: 3513: 3506: 3500: 3493: 3486: 3480: 3459: 3453: 3442: 3435: 3429: 3422: 3415: 3409: 3402: 3395: 3389: 3368: 3362: 3351: 3344: 3338: 3331: 3324: 3318: 3311: 3304: 3298: 3209: 3199: 3169: 3159: 3123: 3113: 3107: 3086: 3075: 3065: 3031: 3021: 3017: 2995: 2964: 2960: 2938: 2920: 2885: 2846: 2810: 2803: 2762: 2722: 2635: 2588: 2544: 2542: 2537: 2534: 2529: 2527: 2522: 2519: 2513: 2509: 2501: 2486: 2368: 2277: 2199: 2180: 2177: 2170: 2154: 2127: 2111: 2108: 2090: 2043: 2020: 1989: 1950: 1932: 1893: 1876: 1850: 1811: 1791: 1785: 1784: 1776: 1768: 1720:sock account 1705: 1677: 1675: 1617: 1612: 1587: 1532: 1529: 1516: 1500: 1484: 1461: 1405: 1362: 1360: 1318: 1274: 1255: 1212: 1157: 1156: 1154: 1147: 1130: 1116:Anil's Ghost 1101: 1098: 1080: 1068: 715: 100: 78: 73: 69: 63: 59: 53: 52: 34: 3839:User:ChrisO 3730:investigate 3639:investigate 3548:investigate 3457:investigate 3366:investigate 2800:RE: Warning 2483:take a look 2365:Wikignoming 1881:Doublespeak 1295:AdjustShift 1280:AdjustShift 1228:Libertarian 1121:Animal Farm 1052:RFA Archive 74:1 July 2009 70:1 June 2009 68:from about 3699:block user 3692:filter log 3608:block user 3601:filter log 3517:block user 3510:filter log 3426:block user 3419:filter log 3335:block user 3328:filter log 3210:discussion 3170:discussion 3124:discussion 3076:discussion 3032:discussion 2206:good faith 1884:smacks of 1787:vandalism. 1609:ANI thread 1256:everything 1033:Archive 84 1023:Archive 83 1013:Archive 82 1003:Archive 81 993:Archive 80 983:Archive 79 964:Archive 78 954:Archive 77 944:Archive 76 934:Archive 75 924:Archive 74 905:Archive 73 895:Archive 72 885:Archive 71 875:Archive 70 865:Archive 69 855:Archive 68 845:Archive 67 835:Archive 66 825:Archive 65 815:Archive 64 805:Archive 63 795:Archive 62 776:Archive 61 766:Archive 60 756:Archive 59 746:Archive 58 736:Archive 57 726:Archive 56 716:Archive 55 706:Archive 54 696:Archive 53 686:Archive 52 676:Archive 51 666:Archive 50 647:Archive 49 637:Archive 48 627:Archive 47 617:Archive 46 607:Archive 45 597:Archive 44 587:Archive 43 577:Archive 42 567:Archive 41 557:Archive 40 547:Archive 39 537:Archive 38 518:Archive 37 508:Archive 36 498:Archive 35 488:Archive 34 478:Archive 33 468:Archive 32 458:Archive 31 448:Archive 30 438:Archive 29 428:Archive 28 418:Archive 27 408:Archive 26 398:Archive 25 388:Archive 24 378:Archive 23 368:Archive 22 349:Archive 21 339:Archive 20 329:Archive 19 319:Archive 18 309:Archive 17 299:Archive 16 289:Archive 15 279:Archive 14 269:Archive 13 259:Archive 12 249:Archive 11 239:Archive 10 41:Archive 56 35:Archive 55 29:Archive 54 3719:CheckUser 3706:block log 3628:CheckUser 3615:block log 3537:CheckUser 3524:block log 3446:CheckUser 3433:block log 3355:CheckUser 3342:block log 2585:Checkuser 2545:Dbachmann 2530:Dbachmann 2510:Dbachmann 2404:HTML Tidy 2210:Gwen Gale 1886:WP:UP#OWN 1656:Gwen Gale 1487:Main Page 1357:Oh right, 1271:Thank you 1231:manifesto 1104:Singapore 229:Archive 9 219:Archive 8 209:Archive 7 199:Archive 6 189:Archive 5 179:Archive 4 169:Archive 3 159:Archive 2 149:Archive 1 3672:contribs 3581:contribs 3564:ChrisOhj 3490:contribs 3399:contribs 3308:contribs 3244:mellower 2767:decltype 2549:Cherbeat 2418:Cheers, 2408:mop-duty 2137:Cenarium 2118:. Move: 1781:states: 1688:BrownBot 1533:Cheers, 1489:, here: 1406:Cheers, 1131:Cheers, 1057:Howcheng 3852:delanoy 3778:delanoy 3087:expects 2759:My mail 2658:Yes. ++ 2622:Viridae 2591:Viridae 2274:an anon 2044:Prodego 1877:changed 1211:Ooooo… 1170:Josette 3796:WP:SPI 3736:cuwiki 3645:cuwiki 3554:cuwiki 3463:cuwiki 3372:cuwiki 3200:Aitias 3160:Aitias 3154:e-mail 3114:Aitias 3066:Aitias 3022:Aitias 2703:Nathan 2647:Nathan 2307:Nathan 2260:Nathan 2181:at all 2132:assume 2124:WP:RFA 2116:WP:AFC 1984:WP:IAR 1833:Nathan 1714:by an 1710:which 1213:‘Jack’ 2971:dαlus 2927:dαlus 2892:dαlus 2853:dαlus 2817:dαlus 2806:check 2726:Versa 2369:don't 2245:Doug. 2162:vecia 2120:WP:RM 2098:vecia 1997:vecia 1955:Doug. 1940:vecia 1908:Doug. 1899:Doug. 1890:WP:UP 1858:vecia 1819:vecia 1799:Doug. 1462:yours 1369:dαlus 1188:! ++ 16:< 3859:adds 3785:adds 3686:logs 3660:talk 3595:logs 3569:talk 3504:logs 3478:talk 3413:logs 3387:talk 3322:logs 3296:talk 3108:much 3043:Here 3014:Yes, 2939:then 2772:talk 2731:geek 2719:Heh! 2642:this 2638:this 2553:talk 2494:talk 2400:busy 2214:talk 2157:enna 2141:talk 2093:enna 1992:enna 1935:enna 1853:enna 1814:enna 1736:talk 1692:talk 1683:you. 1676:The 1660:talk 1619:Ched 1508:plus 1325:talk 1299:talk 1284:talk 1186:Told 1174:talk 1159:Plip 3869:Lar 3823:Lar 3806:Lar 3766:. 3759:. 3723:log 3666:tag 3632:log 3575:tag 3541:log 3484:tag 3450:log 3393:tag 3359:log 3302:tag 3248:Lar 3221:Lar 3205:// 3181:Lar 3165:// 3136:Lar 3119:// 3091:Lar 3071:// 3047:Lar 3027:// 2998:Lar 2943:Lar 2904:Lar 2865:Lar 2830:Lar 2783:Lar 2742:Lar 2677:Lar 2660:Lar 2605:Lar 2568:Lar 2528:As 2446:Lar 2429:Lar 2373:Lar 2288:Lar 2234:own 2185:Lar 2059:Lar 2023:Lar 1748:Lar 1724:bio 1639:Lar 1545:Lar 1445:Lar 1418:Lar 1383:Lar 1340:Lar 1235:Lar 1190:Lar 87:. 3871:: 3825:: 3808:: 3804:++ 3756:, 3753:, 3750:, 3747:, 3725:) 3712:CA 3634:) 3621:CA 3543:) 3530:CA 3452:) 3439:CA 3361:) 3348:CA 3250:: 3223:: 3183:: 3138:: 3093:: 3049:: 3045:++ 3000:: 2967:Dæ 2963:— 2945:: 2923:Dæ 2906:: 2888:Dæ 2867:: 2849:Dæ 2832:: 2813:Dæ 2785:: 2774:) 2744:: 2679:: 2662:: 2607:: 2570:: 2555:) 2496:) 2448:: 2431:: 2393:}} 2389:{{ 2375:: 2358:I 2290:: 2216:) 2187:: 2143:) 2122:. 2061:: 2025:: 1750:: 1746:++ 1738:) 1694:) 1662:) 1641:: 1625:? 1622:: 1547:: 1447:: 1420:: 1385:: 1381:++ 1365:Dæ 1342:: 1327:) 1301:) 1286:) 1237:: 1192:: 1176:) 1168:- 39:| 27:← 3877:c 3875:/ 3873:t 3850:. 3848:J 3831:c 3829:/ 3827:t 3814:c 3812:/ 3810:t 3776:. 3774:J 3739:) 3733:· 3727:· 3721:( 3716:· 3709:· 3703:· 3696:· 3689:· 3683:· 3676:· 3669:· 3663:· 3658:( 3648:) 3642:· 3636:· 3630:( 3625:· 3618:· 3612:· 3605:· 3598:· 3592:· 3585:· 3578:· 3572:· 3567:( 3557:) 3551:· 3545:· 3539:( 3534:· 3527:· 3521:· 3514:· 3507:· 3501:· 3494:· 3487:· 3481:· 3476:( 3466:) 3460:· 3454:· 3448:( 3443:· 3436:· 3430:· 3423:· 3416:· 3410:· 3403:· 3396:· 3390:· 3385:( 3375:) 3369:· 3363:· 3357:( 3352:· 3345:· 3339:· 3332:· 3325:· 3319:· 3312:· 3305:· 3299:· 3294:( 3256:c 3254:/ 3252:t 3229:c 3227:/ 3225:t 3189:c 3187:/ 3185:t 3144:c 3142:/ 3140:t 3099:c 3097:/ 3095:t 3055:c 3053:/ 3051:t 3006:c 3004:/ 3002:t 2951:c 2949:/ 2947:t 2912:c 2910:/ 2908:t 2873:c 2871:/ 2869:t 2838:c 2836:/ 2834:t 2791:c 2789:/ 2787:t 2770:( 2750:c 2748:/ 2746:t 2685:c 2683:/ 2681:t 2668:c 2666:/ 2664:t 2613:c 2611:/ 2609:t 2576:c 2574:/ 2572:t 2551:( 2492:( 2454:c 2452:/ 2450:t 2437:c 2435:/ 2433:t 2381:c 2379:/ 2377:t 2296:c 2294:/ 2292:t 2212:( 2193:c 2191:/ 2189:t 2155:ل 2139:( 2091:ل 2067:c 2065:/ 2063:t 2031:c 2029:/ 2027:t 1990:ل 1933:ل 1851:ل 1812:ل 1756:c 1754:/ 1752:t 1734:( 1690:( 1658:( 1647:c 1645:/ 1643:t 1553:c 1551:/ 1549:t 1453:c 1451:/ 1449:t 1426:c 1424:/ 1422:t 1391:c 1389:/ 1387:t 1348:c 1346:/ 1344:t 1323:( 1297:( 1282:( 1243:c 1241:/ 1239:t 1198:c 1196:/ 1194:t 1172:( 1161:! 125:e 118:t 111:v 43:→ 31:|

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.