Knowledge

User talk:Laurence67

Source 📝

75:
Also, participating with some amount of diplomacy in the discussion instead of just one-liners in the edit history will lead to a better long-term result. "Don't revert faster than you can discuss." The same principle of numbers that makes the Usenet criticisms of Bogdanov so prevalent predict the
187:
All user accounts used by participants in the external controversy (involving the Bogdanov Affari) are banned from Knowledge pending resolution of this matter. The criteria for determining external involvement shall be a review of their edit history, it being presumed that if the vast majority of
63:
I realize that editing on subjects that one is passionate about (for whatever reason) leads to impulsive reverts. But there are some good Knowledge policies and ideas that have nothing to do with content, so please consider taking the time to preserve changes that are good. For instance, think
117:
I also hope, though that's not of your responsability, that you see that the "opposite side" (since apparently noone cares to think it otherwise) will have behaved properly in your temporary absence; note that I intend to to treat them no differently that you, as I have advertised several times
156:, I'm fed up with loosing such a time to fight against malicious people who are protected by a partial administrator. I know that it is exactly what you wished to get by being so strong with us and so lax with YBM, rjb, etc., but in such conditions there is no point to continue. 142:
J'arrête d'éditer l'article (à moins qu'ils remplacent Rama par un administrateur neutre et impartial, on peut rêver) parce que j'en ai marre que tout ce que j'écris soit reverté, c'est une perte de temps. Mais je lui ai bien précisé, tout de suite après qu'il m'ait bloquée
382: 76:
tide of what's going to happen on Knowledge. If you frustrate the technical majority too much, they will just lock the page and write whatever they like. I think this yields better results than not doing it (see the archived discussions on
29:. You were active on the talk page when I warned contributors about the rule, and I'd be quite justified in blocking you right now. But if you stop reverting immediately, I'll assume it was a mistake. Please read the rule again. 98: 400: 94: 114:
I have blocked you for 24 for excessive use of reverts and insufficient discussion and negociations. I hope that you will come back with a more peaceful and collaborative spirit.
135:
Je suis de loin cette affaire et je m'étonne de te voir de nouveau poster après ton départ en grande pompe. Tu avais à mon sens pris la bonne décision.
80:) but certainly nowhere as good as if the participants were realistic about what they were going to be able to get into the article in the long run. 192:
and related pages such as this arbitration that they are not Knowledge editors but persons involved in the external dispute. This group includes:
329: 315: 273: 231: 287: 259: 371: 343: 245: 301: 383:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Regarding_The_Bogdanov_Affair/Proposed_decision#Ban_on_editing_Bogdanov_Affair
357: 217: 203: 323: 309: 267: 225: 319: 305: 263: 295: 47: 253: 249: 167:
Ce serait trop facile qu'il ne reste plus que les ennemis des Bogdanov pour argumenter contre eux...
365: 211: 291: 221: 81: 34: 337: 239: 207: 65: 386: 101: 375: 277: 189: 181: 170: 69: 26: 361: 173: 77: 43: 144: 351: 197: 30: 22: 404: 333: 235: 119: 42:
Arbitration has been requested in a matter you are involved in. Please see
347: 193: 99:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Regarding The Bogdanov Affair/Evidence
407: 389: 122: 104: 84: 50: 37: 374:), a new editor who has edited other areas, are banned from editing 401:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Regarding The Bogdanov Affair
95:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Regarding The Bogdanov Affair
399:
The arbitraton committee has reached a final decision in the
385:
is under consideration and may replace the total bans.
66:Knowledge:Section#Editing_of_individual_sections 8: 97:has been accepted. Please place evidence at 158:But it's not over, you can be sure of that. 346:) and all others who meet the criteria. 378:, pending resolution of this matter. 7: 360:), a regular Knowledge editor, and 154:I won't edit this article any more 14: 72:but this applies to any article. 381:A less restrictive injunction 85:15:46, 30 September 2005 (UTC) 51:19:11, 26 September 2005 (UTC) 38:15:37, 25 September 2005 (UTC) 21:Laurence, you've violated the 1: 408:03:35, 11 November 2005 (UTC) 390:19:07, 17 October 2005 (UTC) 174:18:15, 11 October 2005 (UTC) 127: 180:Ban on editors involved in 123:13:18, 6 October 2005 (UTC) 105:15:30, 5 October 2005 (UTC) 423: 188:their edits were to the 68:. I'm referring to the 64:about the benefits of 138:Cordialement, Julien 90:Arbitration accepted 132:Bonjour Laurence, 17:Three Revert Rule 414: 128:L'éternel retour 422: 421: 417: 416: 415: 413: 412: 411: 397: 376:Bogdanov Affair 190:Bogdanov Affair 185: 182:Bogdanov Affair 130: 112: 92: 70:Bogdanov Affair 61: 59:Section Editing 27:Bogdanov Affair 19: 12: 11: 5: 420: 418: 396: 395:Final decision 393: 184: 178: 177: 176: 168: 164: 163: 149: 148: 129: 126: 111: 108: 91: 88: 78:Talk:Time Cube 60: 57: 55: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 419: 410: 409: 406: 402: 394: 392: 391: 388: 384: 379: 377: 373: 370: 367: 363: 359: 356: 353: 349: 345: 342: 339: 335: 331: 328: 325: 321: 320:82.123.57.232 317: 314: 311: 307: 306:82.123.46.149 303: 300: 297: 293: 289: 286: 283: 279: 275: 272: 269: 265: 264:82.123.187.53 261: 258: 255: 251: 247: 244: 241: 237: 233: 230: 227: 223: 222:ProfesseurYIN 219: 216: 213: 209: 205: 202: 199: 195: 191: 183: 179: 175: 172: 169: 166: 165: 162: 160: 159: 155: 151: 150: 146: 141: 140: 139: 136: 133: 125: 124: 121: 115: 109: 107: 106: 103: 100: 96: 89: 87: 86: 83: 82:Metaeducation 79: 73: 71: 67: 58: 56: 53: 52: 49: 45: 40: 39: 36: 32: 28: 24: 23:3 Revert Rule 16: 398: 380: 368: 354: 340: 326: 312: 298: 284: 281: 270: 256: 242: 228: 214: 200: 186: 161: 157: 153: 152: 137: 134: 131: 116: 113: 93: 74: 62: 54: 41: 20: 387:Fred Bauder 102:Fred Bauder 48:Snowspinner 278:Laurence67 250:CatherineV 171:Laurence67 46:for more. 362:Ze miguel 405:→Raul654 372:contribs 358:contribs 344:contribs 330:contribs 316:contribs 302:contribs 288:contribs 274:contribs 260:contribs 246:contribs 232:contribs 218:contribs 204:contribs 118:before. 31:Bishonen 334:Luis A. 236:Igor B. 110:Blocked 44:WP:RFAR 403:case. 292:EE Guy 366:talk 352:talk 338:talk 324:talk 310:talk 296:talk 282:talk 268:talk 254:talk 240:talk 226:talk 212:talk 198:talk 145:page 120:Rama 35:talk 348:Rbj 332:), 318:), 304:), 290:), 276:). 262:), 248:), 234:), 220:), 208:XAL 206:), 194:YBM 25:at 147:): 33:| 369:· 364:( 355:· 350:( 341:· 336:( 327:· 322:( 313:· 308:( 299:· 294:( 285:· 280:( 271:· 266:( 257:· 252:( 243:· 238:( 229:· 224:( 215:· 210:( 201:· 196:( 143:(

Index

3 Revert Rule
Bogdanov Affair
Bishonen
talk
15:37, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
WP:RFAR
Snowspinner
19:11, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
Knowledge:Section#Editing_of_individual_sections
Bogdanov Affair
Talk:Time Cube
Metaeducation
15:46, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Regarding The Bogdanov Affair
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Regarding The Bogdanov Affair/Evidence
Fred Bauder
15:30, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Rama
13:18, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
page
Laurence67
18:15, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Bogdanov Affair
Bogdanov Affair
YBM
talk
contribs
XAL
talk
contribs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.