615:(if necessary). I imagine that featured articles get viewed a lot by newcomers to the site, and my hope is to ensure that their first impression is positive so they don't dismiss Knowledge (XXG) outright. Sometimes I'm duly impressed by the existing introductions, but my poetic sensibilities usually lead me to feel troubled by repetitive sentence structures and poor word choice. Just as importantly, I don't see an attempt for these introductions to leave out details which are best left to the article body. If I perform a rewording and make a mistake, please correct me.
385:
486:, and prose should be phrased coherently and in a way that eases absorption by the reader. Thus there is value in making sure that a paragraph has a "topic sentence" which gives a central idea that the following sentences are designed to support. (A good test of whether topic sentences have been properly used is to try reading the first sentence of each paragraph, and ensure that this provides an adequate overview of the writing.)
569:
664:, while leaving those other articles intact. The result is a mess which outright duplicates the contents of other articles, and really pushes the reasonable length for the entry. I've kind of given up but I might go back and try to fix this...if the person who made that change has truly gone away and lost interest.
142:), unscrupulous individuals on the web can abuse the model. Businesses hijack articles and place them on their own sites—littering the page with ads which cause blinking madness on every corner of our browser. Even worse, they prevent updates to information, so that it becomes old and inaccurate.
1023:
Ideally each person who received a question would respond. This response doesn't have to be as lengthy as what was received, but should at least depend somehow on what was written. Any formulated and automated response—no matter how instant and "informative"—leads to the same systematic
1015:
You would think that senders would get some kind of indication when an automatic mechanism sweeps a message under the rug. It is claimed that this is not done because it would multiply the impact of spam—since the networks would now have to carry the traffic for the mail AND the receipts. The
839:
I am constantly trying to figure out how software could better enable the process of reading and collaborating on articles. Because these issues are more technical than most editors would care to think about, I have put them on the "Meta-Wiki"—which seems like a more appropriate place to track
782:
can become anything, whether we've previously been a by-product of such a
Creation process or not. Reality as we experience it is malleable, if not for ourselves (as many like me believe) we shape it radically-if-not-entirely for later generations. We can examine every idea: flat earth, lightning
407:
Articles here often tend to become jumbles of facts in no particular order. Since I think of myself as a decent writer, I'll often undertake restructurings merely to ensure articles sound okay when read aloud. I do this on topics I know nothing about—if I happen to find them interesting. I
939:
I am empathetic to this argument. But it only underscores that we must stop the greed and inefficiency that makes it currently impossible to offer food, shelter, and medical care to everyone—regardless of their ability to create compelling artistic content!! Ending artificial scarcities of
695:
is so thorough that it obviates the issue of redundancy between wikis. I tried putting cute little ads which linked to the other wiki to try and steer people away from putting excessive detail about the cartoon on the
Knowledge (XXG). Those were shot down — with the general consensus being
462:
for lead sections. Though some editors feel that this is "just a guideline", I think it shouldn't be taken lightly. There's probably also something about the 3-paragraph number that fits with experimentally verifiable aspects of cognition—such as the difficulty most people have remembering
1044:
manifesto or anything, here. But technologists who cast their wares out into the world without thinking the whole thing through...man. They're only accelerating the rate at which human nature's emergent properties are going to destroy the universe. If they spent as much time thinking of how to
643:
In the meantime, experimental forms of picture layout and linking in the intro don't strike me as a good idea, and one well-chosen picture with a caption should suffice. Gimmicks shouldn't replace the allure of good writing that focuses the reader on the subject. Initiatives like the attempt to
635:
It would be good to figure out how to establish a user setting by which these boxes could be placed in different positions based on a user's preference. One option would be to have them at the top, another would be to pop it up as a separate browser window, or yet another would be to make it the
506:
so that newcoming readers can skip dead-ends that were hit on the way to consensus. Examining debates for important ideas and forming them into articles of their own is the best policy—after all, we keep content pages updated to their most refined state and leave the chaff available in the
1003:
I've noticed a growing tendency of people to use silence to indicate a rejection of a message, and a cultural assumption that this is the intention when a response is not received. This sets a dangerous precedent—especially in an era where internet services are automatically throwing away
933:
As to the egalitarian notion that "information wants to be free" : even if I were to accept the premise that art or entertainment is information, it is clear that in the long queue of "things that want to be free", information would be standing quite a few places behind food and shelter. So
884:
That's a little more complex than "do not practice deception", and perhaps it is unrealistic to think that society and its legal structure could be designed in a way to enforce the policy. I still believe that we could achieve this if people would commit to the objective. I'm disappointed with
547:. This way, those who reach the article through a redirect will quickly know they have reached the right place—even though the title does not match what they were searching for. If it is not sensible to introduce the term in the introduction this way, I would oppose performing the merge.
956:
have expanded my perspectives. I'm still not very impressed by most writing on metaphysical topics, and the sad state of their
Knowledge (XXG) articles reflects that believers have a lot of work to do in putting their claims under scrutiny. Yet given the current balance of power, my focus has
918:
The great moral question of the twenty-first century is this: if all knowing, all culture, all art, all useful information can be costlessly given to everyone at the same price that it is given to anyone; if everyone can have everything, anywhere, all the time, why is it ever moral to exclude
466:
Those who favor long introductions are often passionate about subjects, and are afraid that a shorter introduction would bury important facts in the article body. Yet being selective about what to include in the lead paragraphs will make the subject more clear to a "casual reader". If the
671:. Though I'm no genius on the subject and lack any convincing credentials, I think I could make an entertaining and memorable introduction that would suit someone with a casual interest. So far I've been working on that offline, with some vague notions of trying to publish it as a non
598:
These days I have several projects, as well as some pending campaigns for improving the
Knowledge (XXG) experience. I think about these issues from time-to-time. This is a summary for those interested, as well as a sort of task list to remind me of what I'm supposed to be doing.
631:
for articles that are related. Yet when it comes to introductions, I'd rather see a good picture and a salient caption. That way the lead is not being compromised by yet-another-mechanism for cramming details that belong in the body into the very beginning of the article.
717:
a place for that kind of thing. Some people disagree with the idea that there's a need for all information to be dry and serious—even in an encyclopedia—and these people aren't necessarily bad. Glad there's a place for it, but I do sort of wish the
783:
bolts striking sinners, molecules, goat sacrifices—for educational value, aesthetics, etc. (There's not much of a consensus on what is so compelling that it should be reconstructed in any medium that arises. So far, mankind seems to just keep repeating
1016:
second argument is that giving the feedback would allow spammers to quickly evolve their messages until they beat the tests. This is faulty reasoning, and I think we should be very wary of relying on an infrastructure which is not able to provide a
866:, who is ostensibly interested in education. Knowledge (XXG) is not intended as a soapbox for issues that aren't relevant to writing an open-content encyclopedia, but sharing a few ideas here helps collaborators to understand my biases and goals.
463:
more than 7 digits at a time. There are also a growing number of applications which pull down the lead section (or just the lead paragraph) and put them in small windows—so we are helping enable that software by limiting the amount of text.
758:
description of the belief. That isn't going to change anyone's opinion, and it's just going to send people to the extremes instead of really examining the issue. (Not to mention irritating people like me who are reading the article because we
424:
gives us a fairly basic tool for avoiding that. Pursuant to that idea, a recurring aspect to my edits is to migrate parenthetical remarks into the article they expand upon. This also usually makes things more readable. So rather than saying:
1045:
build in safety systems to their inventions, and going to first principles of what's right before doing things wrong, we'd be in better shape. I believe perfect and self-balancing designs are possible, and I wish we saw more of them.
510:
While old threads are evolving into genuine "editing guides" for each article, personal philosophy should not be lost in the shuffle. Everyone should be busy mutating their opinions and stances into their user pages, or into
441:...I would trust that those who want to know who invented the lightbulb could click and find out. So if I was satisfied that the lightbulb article covered the whole story of invention, then I'd change this to something like:
700:
projects could get that kind of attention, even with a small graphical banner. I might try to write a policy page on the precise guidelines so that people in the future have a place to debate this, it needs to be addressed.
994:
My hope is for those who claim themselves to be "rational" to become less delusional themselves—so that they will not scare intelligent people away from medical treatments which might actually benefit them.
594:
suffix means little, etc). I'm not entirely sure we've gotten the official word on this, and one day I'm going to call the Frito-Lay hotline and find out for sure, and possibly lobby them for a bag of free chips.
467:
introduction is kept short enough, they'll read and absorb it—and be more likely to continue to the rest of the article. Even if a page is only rarely visited by disinterested audiences, they should be
539:
to those individual topics. This is often better than having several short articles which end up either being redundant, or forcing readers to keep flipping between pages to get an overview of the subjects.
20:(You probably notice I think a lot about ideals, infrastructure and policy...and I write a LOT. So the more focused you are the more likely you'll be able to keep me on the topic you want to discuss.)
60:. By ensuring that old versions of information are available, there is less reason to fear making changes that lead to improvement. I hope that it leads people to ultimately expect (and demand)
1032:
status) then they shouldn't have trouble delegating the duty of responding. A policy of not being upset by those who repeat attempts to communicate is also a very important key to the process.
975:
establishment has quietly (and possibly subversively) integrated itself into laws and courts. Their dismissive attitude towards currently unproven phenomena are a serious threat to
America's
874:
A genuine education is the only way to prevent someone from being exploited by those who wish to limit and control them. The quote I came up with that best summarizes my philosophy is:
734:
article that he's fictional, he's not real, and that people can't really shoot fireballs or grow twice their size from eating mushrooms. This is adequately covered by mentioning he's a
885:
those who justify their participation in the existing flawed system, and though we all perpetuate it (in some way) the situation won't improve until we can at least share the goal.
1008:. The practice facilitates interpersonal misunderstanding, as well as the abuse of power by governments or corporations that wish to suppress information about competitors (this
531:
short articles on related topics, based on the lack of technical limitation on the number of pages that
Knowledge (XXG) can host. I point out that creating articles which simply
41:. It's not some kind of impractical social ideal, it's an attainable way of working that is fair and makes sense. I hope that it leads people to ultimately expect (and demand)
934:
until someone can hack a way to make those free, I spend my time working very hard to come up with some really good "information" that, if you keep, I deserve to be paid for.
255:
I'll qualify that by saying that we should always analyze words for their intrinsic ring of correctness, and not jump to conclusions based on who said something...or who it
823:
from time to time...and it's a testbed for my thinking about how we might solve contentious topics. Recently I've been pleased to see the article is miraculously getting
123:
The words you are reading are supposed to be hosted on the
Knowledge (XXG). This 💕 exposes the untapped potential of all those smart people who would otherwise be stuck
543:
I do, however, have one rule about merging topics that could reasonably deserve articles in their own right. Each term should appear in the introduction and be
746:
belief, you can then provide the details and let people decide if it is interesting or relevant to them. The bias of
Knowledge (XXG)'s technical users against
459:
991:. Like psychiatry, they force limited viewpoints on their victims, and charge them huge amounts of money for assistance that is largely ineffective.
809:
people seem to misinterpret complexity as sophistication, which is baffling—the incomprehensible should cause suspicion rather than admiration
608:
952:
I was raised to be skeptical—even hostile—towards the supernatural and those who believed in it. My own experiences with things like
31:, it is sometimes at odds with my personal philosophy about the project. Here are two of the major reasons I think Knowledge (XXG) is important:
154:
111:, or that there was an oversight on my part. Keep sending it through any available avenue—I'm notoriously dedicated to my quest to reduce
99:, and some other services that I've bothered to make accounts on. (If you send me something and don't get a response, something is up. Suspect
206:. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than
648:
don't fit a "one-size-fits-all" attitude toward formatting, but general encyclopedic articles aren't the place for trying these new things.
28:
843:
If you have the interest, then please visit my user page on Meta-Wiki for my views and perspectives on how Wiki
Software can be improved:
623:
There's a growing practice of placing templates at the head of an article that implements fancy "See Also" boxes (such as this one on the
1024:
weaknesses as giving no response. Being "overwhelmed" with messages is not an excuse for ignoring these policies, because if someone is
984:
558:
515:. Anyone who wishes to take an idea I've expressed and integrate it here may do so, though they should expect controversy and changes.
645:
150:
636:
head of the "See Also" section. Personally, I'd set mine to indicate the presence of such sidebars with an indicator like the
192:
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than
799:
Clarity is crucial for our own sake, as well as that of others. I'm interested in figuring out how to stop the acceptance of
139:
675:
work. If no one wants to publish it and pay me enough to feed myself for a day or two, then I'll certainly hand it over.
203:
627:). I think the existence of these graphical sidebars and the ability to re-use them on several pages is neat—like a
1049:
pays a finder's fee of $ 2.56 for any typos/mistakes discovered in his books, and I admire that kind of thing. (Example:
408:
have several guidelines for writing style and editing, which I am constantly evolving as I learn more about this medium.
81:
416:
One software concept I wish every non-technical person knew about (and that technical people would better act upon) is
241:
624:
770:
If modern technology and the impending VR nanodoom has shown us anything, it's that we need to spend more time on
157:
about stemming that particular tide. Therefore I will still suggest that if you find this content anywhere else,
906:
562:
104:
713:
and noting that in the version history, so that when the vandal visits the page again they realize that there
503:
573:
186:
640:. This would appear at the top of the article, and if I were interested I could click through to see it.
482:
is not merely a visual convenience. Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia and not a spew of one-liners like
417:
145:
Though it's legal, this strikes me as very unethical, especially if they've taken writing I've done about
532:
668:
149:
and are using it for profit. Though there is a controversy brewing on
Knowledge (XXG)'s own usage of
820:
719:
697:
37:
586:, based on a debate in a bar over where they got their name. It's something about frying and gold (
495:
976:
855:
722:
were running it, though I'm sure they don't want to touch the subject matter with a ten foot pole.
483:
512:
17:
So you know what you're getting into, please read a little of this before engaging me in a debate.
1075:
1070:
325:
290:
528:
684:
87:
Issues that are truly tangential to the work here should be directed to me via my user name on
1005:
249:
755:
612:
135:
and leave it there forever—in the long run, someone will notice and be able to fix it.
331:
315:
296:
283:
980:
812:
688:
637:
138:
Yet because the content on Knowledge (XXG) can be freely duplicated (per the terms of the
56:
754:
issues lead to droning disclaimers about what a hoax these topics are, often burying the
1017:
953:
816:
499:
100:
44:
384:
1064:
894:
804:
434:
925:
788:
672:
524:
660:
article quite readable. Now someone migrated a bunch of "related articles" into
988:
972:
961:
910:
828:
731:
568:
535:
to a "holistic" discussion of related issues allows one the freedom to continue
803:
which makes knowledge inaccessible to those who would like to pursue it. Like
471:
because those who are already wildly curious about a subject will slog through
735:
1050:
1046:
1041:
1029:
968:
958:
902:
879:"It should never be more profitable to exploit a market than to educate it."
863:
751:
747:
479:
446:
430:
421:
162:
112:
667:
I've thought about maybe contributing some of my notes from school to the
68:
This user page is somewhat strange, because I encourage you to improve it
62:
a full record of one's work in every program used for managing information
898:
859:
763:
it's controversial and we want to know the main ideas so we can better
743:
628:
583:
957:
shifted to being more worried about the strangle-hold that the nearly
217:
800:
784:
80:. Kind words are always welcome—and do feel free to add to my
944:
and Knowledge (XXG) are showing how we might "hack" a way forward.
941:
739:
567:
392:
365:
361:
353:
260:
246:
108:
92:
88:
844:
691:
cartoon — as there's a separate Homestar Runner Wiki. The
420:. Redundancy is bad (when left to human hands to maintain), and
764:
661:
657:
582:
The very first article I edited was to provide some findings on
132:
967:
Although many watchdogs decry the fairly "surface" mixture of
687:
project, and wantonly interfered with pages pertaining to the
170:
96:
983:
movement has its own agenda—and organizations like the
54:
Knowledge (XXG) is one of few well-known projects that use
710:
27:
Although I know that there is a formal policy regarding
77:
69:
987:
are controlled by the interests of movements such as
905:
hardware, it's not entirely open although thankfully
709:
If I see someone add a funny thing, I'm moving it to
726:
Taking Excessive Disclaimers out of New Age Articles
692:
76:
about the material then append those comments to my
131:to it. Webmasters can't put up stale content on a
47:from every government and corporation in the world
35:Knowledge (XXG)'s politics provide a showcase for
265:Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice.
245:: bb182b21d260af178a1ef057956ab7978524fbc4 is a
1004:content that has been mechanically analyzed as
72:...it's the wiki way! If you'd like to have a
458:I agree strongly with the general rule of the
979:. However, it is important to note that the
494:I don't agree with the mindset of preserving
321:
8:
845:http://meta.wikimedia.org/User:Metaeducation
38:transparency in making and applying policies
730:You wouldn't continuously reiterate in the
323:Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel
811:. So I'm strangely drawn to the likes of
738:character. In a similar vein, if you say
1036:The Dangers of Badly Designed Technology
999:The Importance of Reliable Communication
897:(though I've been skewered into running
619:Put "See Also" Templates In Article Body
478:It is also important to remember that a
940:information is a key, and efforts like
679:Trying to Stop Repetition Between Wikis
259:said something. (I think this is what
705:Moving Misplaced Humor to Uncyclopedia
656:I and some other editors once had the
57:software with built-in version control
7:
964:movement has over our institutions.
924:Yet I think the eloquent songwriter
519:Dynamically Merge And Split Articles
379:
360:This user can smurf articles with a
311:
279:
985:Citizens Commission on Human Rights
559:what I've been meddling with lately
252:to this user's real-life identity.
215:. The original page is located at
161:and follow these directions to the
683:I investigated how to organize an
14:
971:influence on our government, the
607:I've taken to checking in on the
383:
348:
611:of the day and cleaning up the
765:make fun of it on Uncyclopedia
490:Constantly Refactor Talk Pages
140:GNU Free Documentation License
1:
835:Improvements to Wiki Software
454:Three Paragraph Introductions
212:pedia
198:pedia
183:pedia
901:due to the tragic allure of
496:full archives of discussions
263:was getting at when he said
1040:Not wanting to rewrite the
445:"With the invention of the
151:"subtle" paid advertisement
103:, incompetent or malicious
29:what Knowledge (XXG) is not
1092:
1012:happened on major sites).
870:My Philosophy of Education
609:upcoming featured articles
502:, discussions here can be
119:First, An Important Notice
889:On Freedom of Information
821:Bogdanov Affair talk page
603:Featured Article Meddling
322:
1028:popular (perhaps due to
850:About Me and my "Ideals"
498:on talk pages. Unlike
460:three-paragraph maximum
242:Committed identity
209:Wiki
195:Wiki
180:Wiki
82:newly-created barnstars
948:My Paranormal Leanings
831:might work after all.
577:
418:database normalization
168:Knowledge (XXG) editor
928:raises a good point:
819:. I check in on the
756:neutral point of view
669:Movie-Making Wikibook
571:
469:the targeted audience
297:English language
225:ki/User:Metaeducation
795:Reading About Hoaxes
720:Wikimedia foundation
698:WikiMedia Foundation
475:stylistic decision.
412:Eliminate Redundancy
977:freedom of religion
893:I'm an advocate of
856:electrical engineer
127:the web instead of
646:Pokemon characters
578:
271:Editing Philosophy
236:Committed Identity
202:you are viewing a
105:internet filtering
1020:to blocked mail.
909:). I agree with
625:History of Poland
405:
404:
400:
399:
372:
371:
341:
340:
304:
303:
233:
232:
1083:
858:and film school
387:
380:
349:
337:
336:
312:
280:
275:
274:
229:
226:
223:
220:
214:
213:
210:
201:
199:
196:
185:
184:
181:
171:
1091:
1090:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1061:
1060:
1038:
1001:
981:anti-psychiatry
950:
891:
872:
852:
837:
813:Bogdanov Affair
797:
728:
707:
689:Homestar Runner
681:
654:
638:portal template
621:
605:
553:
527:are opposed to
521:
513:policy articles
500:bulletin boards
492:
456:
414:
401:
390:This user runs
373:
342:
305:
288:This user is a
273:
253:
238:
224:
221:
219:https://en.wiki
218:
216:
211:
208:
207:
197:
194:
193:
191:
182:
179:
178:
169:
155:open discussion
121:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1089:
1087:
1079:
1078:
1073:
1063:
1062:
1037:
1034:
1018:bounce message
1000:
997:
954:lucid dreaming
949:
946:
937:
936:
922:
921:
913:when he says:
907:some parts are
890:
887:
882:
881:
871:
868:
851:
848:
836:
833:
796:
793:
772:What Should Be
727:
724:
706:
703:
680:
677:
653:
650:
620:
617:
604:
601:
580:
579:
552:
549:
520:
517:
491:
488:
455:
452:
451:
450:
439:
438:
413:
410:
403:
402:
398:
397:
388:
378:
375:
374:
370:
369:
358:
347:
344:
343:
339:
338:
319:
310:
307:
306:
302:
301:
291:native speaker
286:
278:
272:
269:
239:
237:
234:
231:
230:
174:
167:
153:, there is an
120:
117:
101:identity theft
78:user talk page
66:
65:
51:
50:
45:accountability
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1088:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1068:
1066:
1059:
1058:
1054:
1052:
1048:
1043:
1035:
1033:
1031:
1027:
1021:
1019:
1013:
1011:
1007:
998:
996:
992:
990:
986:
982:
978:
974:
970:
965:
963:
960:
955:
947:
945:
943:
935:
931:
930:
929:
927:
920:
916:
915:
914:
912:
908:
904:
900:
896:
895:Free Software
888:
886:
880:
877:
876:
875:
869:
867:
865:
861:
857:
854:I'm a simple
849:
847:
846:
841:
840:and discuss.
834:
832:
830:
826:
822:
818:
814:
810:
806:
805:Niklaus Wirth
802:
794:
792:
790:
786:
781:
777:
773:
768:
766:
762:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
725:
723:
721:
716:
712:
704:
702:
699:
694:
690:
686:
678:
676:
674:
670:
665:
663:
659:
652:Film Projects
651:
649:
647:
641:
639:
633:
630:
626:
618:
616:
614:
613:introductions
610:
602:
600:
596:
593:
590:means gold, -
589:
585:
575:
570:
566:
564:
560:
555:
554:
551:Projects Here
550:
548:
546:
541:
538:
534:
530:
526:
525:inclusionists
518:
516:
514:
508:
505:
501:
497:
489:
487:
485:
481:
476:
474:
470:
464:
461:
453:
448:
444:
443:
442:
436:
435:Thomas Edison
433:(invented by
432:
428:
427:
426:
423:
419:
411:
409:
395:
394:
389:
386:
382:
381:
377:
376:
367:
363:
359:
357:
355:
351:
350:
346:
345:
334:
333:
328:
327:
320:
317:
314:
313:
309:
308:
299:
298:
293:
292:
287:
285:
282:
281:
277:
276:
270:
268:
266:
262:
258:
251:
248:
244:
243:
235:
227:
205:
190:
188:
175:
173:
172:
166:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
143:
141:
136:
134:
130:
126:
118:
116:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
85:
83:
79:
75:
71:
63:
59:
58:
53:
52:
48:
46:
43:openness and
40:
39:
34:
33:
32:
30:
25:
22:
21:
18:
1056:
1055:
1039:
1025:
1022:
1014:
1009:
1002:
993:
966:
951:
938:
932:
926:Michael Penn
923:
917:
892:
883:
878:
873:
853:
842:
838:
824:
808:
798:
779:
775:
774:rather than
771:
769:
761:already know
760:
729:
714:
711:Uncyclopedia
708:
682:
673:free-content
666:
655:
642:
634:
622:
606:
597:
591:
587:
581:
557:Want to see
556:
544:
542:
536:
522:
509:
493:
477:
472:
468:
465:
457:
440:
437:) led to..."
415:
406:
391:
352:
330:
324:
295:
289:
264:
256:
254:
240:
222:pedia.org/wi
176:
159:DISREGARD IT
158:
146:
144:
137:
128:
124:
122:
86:
74:conversation
73:
67:
61:
55:
42:
36:
26:
23:
19:
16:
15:
989:Scientology
973:psychiatric
962:objectivist
911:Eben Moglen
829:peer review
778:. Because
732:Super Mario
563:wikistalker
204:mirror site
107:, that I'm
1065:Categories
862:living in
789:everywhere
736:video game
696:that only
644:inventory
574:Wikistress
504:refactored
250:commitment
177:This is a
70:by editing
1076:User es-1
1071:User en-N
1051:Therac-25
1047:Don Knuth
1042:Unabomber
1030:celebrity
969:Christian
903:PowerBook
864:Hollywood
817:Time Cube
752:religious
748:spiritual
685:Interwiki
565:? :)
507:history.
484:Googlisms
480:paragraph
447:lightbulb
431:lightbulb
422:hypertext
364:level of
187:user page
165:version:
163:canonical
113:isolation
899:Mac OS X
693:"Hrwiki"
533:redirect
919:anyone?
860:dropout
780:What Is
776:What Is
744:New Age
629:webring
584:Doritos
537:linking
529:merging
332:español
294:of the
125:reading
959:amoral
825:better
807:said,
801:jargon
785:Tetris
576:level!
561:, you
545:bolded
362:smurfy
326:básico
147:myself
129:adding
84:page!
942:arXiv
827:, so
742:is a
740:Reiki
523:Many
429:"The
393:macOS
366:Smurf
261:Jesus
257:seems
247:SHA-1
93:Yahoo
89:Gmail
1026:that
1006:spam
815:and
662:Film
658:Film
449:..."
133:wiki
109:dead
1010:has
791:.)
787:...
767:.)
750:or
592:ito
588:oro
572:My
473:any
329:de
115:.)
97:AIM
1067::
1053:)
715:is
356:-s
354:sm
318:-1
316:es
284:en
267:)
95:,
91:,
1057:Æ
396:.
368:.
335:.
300:.
228:.
200:,
189:.
64:.
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.