User talk:Lawrencekhoo/Archive 8

2043:

failed after you devoted heroic time and attention to his "concerns" almost a year ago on your talk page. Now you're reengaging with him on exactly the same slop in all its meaningless and hideous detail. There's plenty of policy about Tendentious Editing and NPOV and V and on and on that tells us such conduct is not acceptable because it derails the Project. I mean you no disrespect, but is this the best use of everyone's time? There's no point trying to make progress on that article when it's being trolled. There's nothing reasonable about trolling, rehashing, repeating and all the other tricks of the tendentious trade. The other possible resolution is to ignore and if he continues to edit war his nonsense at some point somebody will file an ANI and escort him to other earthly pursuits.

2024:. We can't eliminate opponents and remove them from the board. I can only hope, through discussion, to reach a version of the article that addresses his concerns, while still remaining grounded in mainstream economics. I also hope to educate him on what economics textbook state, and why they are written the way they are, so that he can see that the mainstream point of view is not unreasonable. Also, frankly, I don't think any other strategy works on Knowledge (XXG) in the long run, except to bring all reasonable parties into agreement. As long as the other person is being reasonable, I remain willing to talk. I don't really see any other possible resolution. 1935:

opinion should be the yardstick for factual information. If, for example, Time Magazine is reluctant to publish a leaked information in their newspaper due to some vested interest, Knowledge (XXG) should not follow this (and actually does not) but instead does publish the information. The same applies when major newspaper are slow to respond to a new revelation - Knowledge (XXG) shouldn't wait for them to publish it. I spoke to several academics on the issue and received support for my position on this. I think if we continue to disagree on this, it might be useful to get a third opinion on this.

2923:. Consider it like this, a typical book on a particular topic in economics has about 500 pages and 20 chapters. An article may have (pushing it) about 500 sentences, and 20 sections. Would this off-hand idea from Glaeser's book, AFAIK undiscussed by anyone else, receive a chapter of discussion in a book on Jevons Paradox? If no (and it won't) then there shouldn't be a section on it. Would it receive a 5 page discussion in a book? If no (again, it won't) then it shouldn't have 5 sentences in the Knowledge (XXG) article. Really, I shouldn't have to explain this to you. 2173: 2372:

commercial interests that led you to make this claim. For instance, you declare a preference for “mainsteam academic thought” over objectivity and neutrality. The purpose of “mainsteam academic thought” is to sustain the academic business model at any cost to society, whereas Knowledge (XXG) exists for the benefit of all humanity. You also advertize what academic certificates you own, even though Knowledge (XXG) follows the example of reputable scholarly journals in

1892:

covered only major sources, we would have quite few contemporary scandals exposed on Knowledge (XXG) because at the time they do not always figure prominently in the news but it would in my view violate the spirit of Knowledge (XXG) to exclude facts that are arguably very relevant. So if reliable sources exclude an important information, does the reliable source rule still apply? This is why we also include "significant minority views" on Knowledge (XXG).

219: 770: 2102: 1752: 1084:

of a page before submitting. Knowledge (XXG) pages usually grow incrementally. Also, lastly, if possible always back up your edits with a source. I think the most trouble that new editors have with Knowledge (XXG) is that they don't understand the strict requirements for sourcing that Knowledge (XXG) has. Anything likely to be challenged should be backed up with a

640: 470: 841:. While it is very clear from the sockpuppet investigations that PennySeven has used IP addresses hosted in Portugal, I don't see anything in the archive that addresses the user's nationality or residence. Accordingly, I've struck that part of your comment and replaced it with a comment about the geographical location of the IP addresses. 1250:- Really? I wasn't aware that it's "bad form" to correct a significant misuse of the RfC template. Anyway, your change reverted the RfC creator's non-use of that category, so that assertion is more than a little hypocritical. Or does your rule apply only to the removal of something? No need to reply. ― 1918:

I think you're missing the point. This is exactly the situation that Jimbo was talking about. Unless and until The Guardian, Time Magazine, The New York Times, etc... start referring to the prize as the "Central Bank of Sweden Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences", Knowledge (XXG) should not do

1821:

Hello Lawrencekhoo, I am wondering why you undid my changes to the page of Joseph Stiglitz and Eugene Fama regarding the Nobel Prize? In fact, the original Swedish title even says "Sveriges riksbanks pris i ekonomisk vetenskap till Alfred Nobels minne". To my mind this is an important information and

1671:

23:33, 9 September 2016‎ 134.134.139.76 (talk)‎ . . (56,808 bytes) (+1,193)‎ . . (→‎Deflationary spiral) 03:58, 9 September 2016‎ 192.55.55.41 (talk)‎ . . (55,615 bytes) (+1,638)‎ . . (Added: marked "deflation is a problem" as a speculation. Added citation needed for arguable claim (claim not Author

1048:

I'm something of a subject matter expert on the topic, having written a book about 2/3 devoted to a permanent or at least sustained slowdown in material progress (approximately equal to economic growth for these purposes). C. Owen Paepke, The Evolution of Progress, Random House, 1993. I have stayed

910:

and put the speed of East printing about 2000 pages per day. However, recently Gun Powder Ma change this edition and put the figure forty per day. There is a huge difference between these two figure. 2000 is 50 times of forty. I wonder which one is the right。 Then the article claim Gutenberg invented

2396:

secondary sources) exist and are widely disseminated (just like the previous sentences in the same pragraph). You're more than welcome to feel that those widely disseminated syntheses are flawed, but censoring a record of their existence is wrong. If the sentence needs restructing to make it clearer

1355:

If you're referring to my preceding comment, I only meant that your response to my very logical argument is to resort to legalisms and to call it "tortured". Given that, continuing would probably only result in you removing the "discussion", as per your right on your own talk page and your statement

1083:

Hi sorry for the delay in replying. I wasn't certain how to respond. I don't really have much advice to give. Just jump in and start editing. I suggest starting with something small, it's easier to see how things work if you edit a paragraph and see how people respond. Don't make a whole new version

1060:

I read your comments to Marek and Ellen, which I thought were constructive (and likely to be disregarded). I welcome your thoughts on (1) whether a comprehensive rewrite on this topic would add value and (2) how to navigate the somewhat tendentious cross-currents apparent in the recent dialog. I'm

1056:

Doing a quality job on this would take me a few months. Though generally current, I would need to get a better understanding of Krugman and Cowen's thoughts and Gordon's most recent writings, as well as the Green take on this. I'm willing, even happy, to do this, but not if I'll just get caught in

939:

Please do not leave misleading or false edit summaries. There is no discussion for the term "heterodox" on the article talk page, and the version your friend Srich attempted to change the Lede to is clearly not consensus - in fact it appears that your friend SRich and a pair of suspicious IP editors

2868:

I do not agree that it is UNDUE: the author of the material is a noted and well-respected economist, and an authority on the subject in question, and there's no way that a couple of sentences can be considered to be UNDUE. So, a determination of what is and isn't UNDUE is not cut-and-dried, nor do

2371:

Please do not let your financial stake in the trade of academia compromise Knowledge (XXG). You incorrectly claim that a sentence (on widely disseminated reactions to Nakamoto's post-banking crisis comment) is “original research or syntheses of published material”, and your profile page reveals the

2042:

Well, WP is not a competitive sport, but neither is it an invitation to self-promoting or ignorant trolls to entangle experts such as you and Famspear in endless rehash of the same POV errors or promotion of the local guru from the institution of the Empire. You told this editor that discussion had

1891:

Thanks for your response. Of course the reliable source is the way to go in most cases but precisely as it says on the page: " making sure that all majority and significant minority views". In this case, I think the family of Nobel himself is obviously a very significant source. If Knowledge (XXG)

1052:

The current Knowledge (XXG) treatment is inadequate. Reading the talk page over the weekend, I saw what looked like a running ideological duel between Marek and EllenCT, which seemed to me better suited to a blog than an encyclopedia. I posted a long section on the talk page. As of this morning,

564:

Hi Lawrence, thanks for your feedback and suggestions at the PR. I have looked through your recommendations, and while I am not able to agree with a few of your points, please feel free to take look at the explanations that I have input. I do not know how to implement the recommendations on the IPA

1875:

Looking at the result pages, it's pretty clear that reliable sources call it the Nobel Prize in Economics, or less popularly, the "Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences". I can come up with dozens of examples easily. No reliable sources that I can find call it the "Central Bank of Sweden Nobel

1934:

I don't think that simply following mainstream coverage is the way Knowledge (XXG) should run. If the NYT leave out crucial information on a given subject, it is websites like Knowledge (XXG) where you can go to get the full information. Basically, what you are saying is that mainstream newspaper

966:

A search for "heterodox" in the talk page archives yields links to several discussions on the issue. I don't see what you hope to gain by stating something so easily disproved. Also, open proxies are routinely blocked by Knowledge (XXG). There is no reason to believe that the IPs you point to are

413:

Hi. You did not seem to mind that the article had been for over two years spiralled downward into a cesspool of off-topicness, incompetent ranting combined with petty Korean and Chinese nationalism, but as soon as I restored its contents and quality along the line of typographic printing you have

369:

However, the main reason I am contacting you is that I tried to post this query on the talk page of the article, and it did not seem possible. Can you tell me how to do it? Perhaps if the page is semi-protected, it is impossible to add anything to the talk page as well? From reading Knowledge

1049:

current with the subject matter and believe I could do justice to the 40 year history, the arguments for and against a systemic slowdown, and the four extant theories for why it might have occurred now after 200 years of rapid growth. I've had sporadic dialogs with some academics on the topic.

586:

Blind reverts are rarely useful: you could have done me the courtesy of addressing individual edits, which would have made you realize that my edits were done judiciously. You turned this article back into a fluffy, resume-style collection of factoids with lousy sourcing, and an atrocious lead.

1996:

LK, you're a natural-born teacher with the patience of a saint, but after at least 3 years of bludgeoning, etc. do you really believe this is going to turn out to be a presentational issue? How many central banks are there in the world and how many staff research papers from each and how many

1508:

Hello, my name is Joseph I am working on a project about The Great Depression, and searching for information I found your graphic of the US GDP between 1910-1960, so, I would like to know if you could gave me the datums you used to make the grafic. It's because I want to do a graphic but with

1801:

tags – acceptable but not ideal practice. This process preserved the original text and left the article in much the same condition as before but without in-text URLs. I don't think it a good idea to make edits that leave the text damaged, whatever the reasons for the change. Best wishes.

1246:- And the existence of improper usage does not justify the creation of more improper usage. As I tried to convey, virtually every RfC has something to do with implementation of one policy/guideline or another, so that can't possibly be the intent of the category. It just fails a logic test. 358:

Thank you for your response regarding the Caroline Hoxby article. There is in fact a reliable source for Hoxby's denial: she immediately wrote a letter of complaint to the Crimson, which was published at the time. Another editor noticed this a few years ago and posted it on the talk page:

2296:

project page on Meta, where I am trying to create some momentum to reduce the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement. My first goal is to have all the Wikimedia servers run on renewable energy. Maybe you could show your support for this project as well by adding your signature

1356:

at the top: "Note: I reserve the right to keep and archive only those conversations I deem relevant to Knowledge (XXG)." I know when I'm wasting my time, and I don't edit war, and I'm not going to start an RfC on the purpose of that RfC category. So I surrender, congratulations. ―

2424:

Thanks for the message. I'll admit I agree largely with what you say, however as football is not something I'm too familiar with I saw that it was fairly standard to use those words in the leads, so left it alone. I do feel though, that writing just "footballer" while linking to

69:, without communicating on the talk page about this issue. I shouldn't have to explain this to you. This is conduct quite unbecoming of an admin. Your proper course of action is to step back from this BLP as your political stance appears to have taken over your better judgement. 2405:— that's the whole point of the wiki concept. Don't censor it for reasons of self-interest. And don't misrepresent something as “trivia” just because it comes from outside academia. There are about 7 billion of us outside academia, and we pay for you, which isn't trivial! 2696:

He has twice been nominated for the Tony Award for Best Lead Actor in a Musical. That is all the references I need to show he's notable as an actor. If it's not enough for you, then feel free to Google it. I'm sure that you'll find dozens of sources calling him an actor.

1216:

There is no way to respect the process and bring high quality sources both, at this point. I have some statistics I have collected which I would like to discuss. I am not allowed to discuss them with you here. Are you willing to have a conversation about this off-wiki?

268:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 1420:

It is very VERY common, and keeping with the accepted practices, for comments to be added immediately following an editor's !vote, and to also have an "Extended Discussion" section or a "Threaded Discussion" section. See the following for an example.

2114:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1053:

that talk page seems to have gone away (so I don't know if anyone replied), and the comment that the article was under review has vanished. (The inner workings of Knowledge (XXG) remain a mystery to me, and I am content for them to stay that way.)

2950:

and I reverted it as soon as I noticed it. You then reintroduced it without justification, which I did not notice. Stating that it's a stable part of the article and so it should stay, is a bit pushing it. A consensus of one is not a consensus.

1972:

Basically, any administrator will agree with LK. Most Reliable Sources omit the "Central Bank of Sweden" bit, so as we can only call it one thing when we mention it, we follow the great majority (but mention all the other issues on the

234: 865:(PennySeven socks edited the Nicolaas Smith talk page). User Nicolaas Smith edited quite extensively in the past, and made clear who he was and what book he had written. I believe that makes it public information. Regards, 232:

to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is

2142: 366:. I don't think the Knowledge (XXG) article should repeat a quotation by a student reporter if the originator of the supposed quotation claims to have been misquoted. --Orlady (talk) 21:22, 11 December 2012 (UTC) 1826:) Although you seem to be busy making sure that academic mainstream opinion is represented on Knowledge (XXG), I am not sure whether mainstream depiction of the prize should trump factual background information. 2551:"After someone reverts your change, thus taking a stand for the existing version and/or against the change, you can proceed toward a consensus with the challenging editor through discussion on a talk page." 2896:

of editors if we cannot work out something between us. Saying "I wrote most of the article" and therefore "I will remove it tomorrow" without waiting for consensus is simply not the way things work here.

2126:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 543:

Given that you recently added the phrase "financial intermediary" to the lede, I think it appropriate that you should comment on the "main page contradicts itself" post on the FRB talk page. Thanks.

2572:

If you'd like me to, I can start an RfC also regarding the placement of the sentence mentioning the album's recording and release dates. If you really want to continue to make a thing out of it...

2376:

using letters after authors’ names to bolster credibility in the eyes of the gullible. (In an encyclopedia, as in an original research publication, the reliability of the content is supposed to be

1126: 998: 815: 993:

has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Paul Singer (businessman)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation.

229: 1617:

Hello Lawrence. This is just a message to let you know that I have recently initiated a 'support/opposition' section at the RfC discussing the issues surrounding the use of "quote boxes" (

918: 1822:

should be added to the Knowledge (XXG) pages of the recipients of the price since the price was funded by the central bank. Besides, the Nobel family distanced themselves from the prize (

2401:(just like the previous sentences in the same pragraph, which you've left in place despite them being structurally and logically eqivalent to the sentence that you want to censor), then 155: 1484:

Initiators do not 'own' a RfC, and they certainly do not get to write the consensus statement for it. If you feel that my closing statement is wrong, you are free to challenge it at

1640:

After anti-deflationary bias in original article was fixed and speculative statements (not supported by sources) rephrased. You undo whole commit, based on your gut feelings.

150:(capital first letters) is a specific US organization so the namesake category is not meant to include all "veterans who served overseas" (lower case first letters). I added 2433:. I'm curious to see what comes of the discussion now though, but feel because I don't really have a vested interest, or the familiarity with the topic, I won't participate. 1279:

of policy is (in your words) "improper usage". Your logic is tortured, I added the category as part of reformulating the RfC to what I felt was a more appropriate question.

1964:, I just reverted a lot of your edits after stumbling across them randomly and I am here to explain why and be the third opinion. LK has posted a magnificent explanation of 2292:

Hi Lawrencekhoo, please allow me to get in touch because you have stated sympathy with environmental causes on your user page. I would like to invite you to check out the

2716:. The lead sentence does not list the notable things the person does, the lead sentence describes the person as he is described in reliable sources. Note the difference 1621:). As you previously expressed a view on this issue over at the MoS talk page several days ago, you may wish to reiterate your opinion in a 'support/oppose' format. Best, 65:

The 'bold' edit was the original insertion of controversial material a couple of days before I reverted it. You then reinserted that controversial new material into a BLP

558: 997:

is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the

565:

and "alt" texts that you have raised; please feel free to assist if you are able to, but don't feel obliged if you are unable to do so. I hope to hear from you again :)

1763:. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 844:

I wanted to let you know that I did it and why I did it. If you'd like to discuss this matter further, feel free to continue this conversation via talk page or email. —

301:

in my book entitled 'Your Future Job: How to Build a Career in the New Normal.' The book is intended for 17 to 22 year-olds, and is about just what the title says.

2882:

I also do not agree with your contention that you are simply reverting a (9 month old!!) "bold" inclusion. After that length of time, the material is part of the

1469:

If you wish to declare a consensus, feel free, but do so outside of the withdrawn RfC. Same subsection would be fine, but certainly outside of the closed part.

1439: 1198:

I don't have anything to add to my previous advice. Respect the process, do the research to bring high quality sources, report them truthfully, and play nice.

1392:

Ehh, it never crossed my mind to remove this. If you check my history, I only remove stuff that is clearly off-topic and/or people being excessively rude.

2740:

is the wrong venue. If someone would ask for whitelisting of specific links with a rather proper rationale then the whole RfC can be moot in minutes. --

1974: 1045:

LK, I'm a wiki rookie interested in contributing a substantive piece on secular stagnation. I would appreciate any help or guidance you might offer.

2310: 1122: 1006: 911:

the metal movable printing without source. However, in my memory it was first invented by Korean. Can you check these and add some reliable source?

2529:

Well the consensus seems to be that it's not for the better as you think. I seriously suggest you discuss it at the WP:Football thread you started.

2361: 1950: 1907: 1841: 837:

Greetings! I hate refactoring other users' talk page comments, but I felt that, to err on the side of caution, I needed to do it to one of yours at

154:

to try and make the intended use clearer. Mr. Gore served in the Vietnam War so his military service is included in the article categorization with

414:

nothing better to do to show up and attack me in the summary line. You couldn't have shown better your colours and class, or rather lack of it....

2341: 1002: 712: 2457: 1856:. We call things according to what reliable sources call things. You get the following results if you do a google news search on the phrases: 447:

Sorry, but I don't have any time to check the sources, so I cannot verify the validity of the figures. Best of luck tracking everything down.

249: 2212: 162:

a member of a VFW fraternal lodge for a few years but that fact isn't even mentioned in the article and probably wouldn't be defining under

2276: 2156: 1068: 1658:

is an imaginable situation Which is better than original "situation", which creates perspective that such kind of situation might exists.

1727:

According to economic study done by Atkeson and Kehoe there is no statistically significant connection between depression and deflation*

2406: 1516: 617: 588: 319: 304:

I believe the figure is public domain, which means I can use it. But this is commercial use, so I respectfully request your permission.

2272: 1118: 2357: 1823: 1673: 819: 1760: 861:

Dear Fred, I totally understand. If you look at the PennySeven SPI archives, the investigations link him with an earlier banned user

1800:

page. Just to let you know that I re-rolled back your recent roll back and then placed the offending external links in <ref: -->

174: 151: 922: 257: 2348:

September 9, 2016)? Please chime in on a way to determine such questions in a much more consistent manner than at present...here:

1013:

Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 7 June 2016.

883:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nicolaas_Smith/Archive#Report_date_October_24_2009.2C_05:30_.28UTC.29

956: 1169: 1130: 1028: 990: 2152: 240:

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means

2135: 1485: 1138: 390: 363: 2429:

is less of an issue, as the latter is a rarely used term and only the article title to distinguish from the various forms of

1780: 1129:, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the 46:

say "remove POV smearing" in any event. Your proper course is to present your desired edit on the BLP talk page and see how

2268: 386: 2353: 1759:. Knowledge (XXG) is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a 1570:

I noticed you are the creator of . It's three years later now; do you happen to feel like updating this to keep it timely?

882: 2737: 370:(XXG)'s online directions for adding comments, etc. to talk pp. I gather there should normally be an edit button showing. 494: 253: 1946: 1903: 1837: 1329:

Question - this is my talk page - but I assume you are talking about something else? If so what? I'm genuinely curious.

730: 2298: 1713:

which is immediately supported by link to opinion of economist, Philipp Bagus. Who wrote a book and papers on subject.

265: 2738:

MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist#RfC:_Should_the_.22Concise_Encyclopedia_of_Economics.22_be_blacklisted_or_whitelisted.3F

2673: 2147: 1807: 952: 261: 186: 1064:

I will await your reply here before proceeding. I don't have a page, as I don't plan to be a serial contributor.

38:

your bold edit there. I looked and looked and did not find the sourced material to be "POV smearing" and, alas,

1626: 245: 167: 1153: 1134: 385:

I've removed the race/gender bias statement, since it's disputed and controversial. The Hoxby article has been

362:

I found the letter to the Crimson in which Hoxby said she had been misquoted regarding "race and gender bias":

147: 2123: 1183:

I would like to discuss the systemic bias issue with you off-wiki. Do you have a preferred method of contact?

1072: 1961: 1942: 1899: 1833: 1520: 323: 2902: 2837: 2460:

on the Wikiproject Football talkpage. I think its always good to have outsiders join in a discussion. Rgds,

2438: 2410: 1137:. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see 805: 664:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

621: 592: 419: 1938: 1895: 1829: 1512: 914: 811: 718: 315: 2956: 2928: 2859: 2851:. BRD is a essay. And please do not us BRD to justify reverting back inclusion of disputed material. See 2779: 2759: 2721: 2607: 2465: 2029: 1924: 1881: 1803: 1694:

1. Removal of "speculation" tag. Why? Paragraph is clearly a speculative statement and original research:

1677: 1602: 1555: 1493: 1397: 1334: 1292: 1203: 1100: 1024: 972: 891: 870: 607: 529: 434: 398: 343: 201: 127: 74: 17: 2893: 2870: 1092: 994: 862: 47: 2349: 449: 182: 2324:

application of wp:GNG/wp:BIO against wp:AUTH/wp:PROF...and both vis-a-vis vagaries of actual practice!)

241: 270:

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

2549:

The person whose bold edit is reverted has the burden of redirecting their efforts to the talk page;

2453: 2449: 2426: 2293: 1622: 697: 2852: 2172: 2110: 2092: 1061:

offering because I think I am well versed on this subject and that it has practical significance.

2676:

Seemed there was a consensus to remove it, at least with the current caption which looks very SYN.

2260: 2078: 2051: 2009: 1824:

https://rwer.wordpress.com/2010/10/22/the-nobel-family-dissociates-itself-from-the-economics-prize/

1797: 1732: 1145: 838: 831: 278: 116: 2640:

Also, I think it's safe to assume less-than-good faith when my explanation in the edit summary of

2599: 2119: 1447: 1422: 1284: 163: 2898: 2833: 2434: 2264: 1982: 1774: 1764: 1736: 1366: 1311: 1260: 787: 751: 722: 415: 2848: 2812:

everted by another editor, the next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to

2750:

Since you are more familiar with the process, would you mind moving the RfC to what you believe

2649: 2573: 2558: 2492: 1509:

percentatges. I would be so grateful if you could do this little favor for me. Your sincerely.

1287:

the non-use of a category. If that were so, every addition to an article would be a reversion.

1125:. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the 2952: 2924: 2855: 2775: 2755: 2717: 2603: 2480: 2461: 2025: 1998: 1920: 1877: 1598: 1551: 1489: 1474: 1455: 1393: 1330: 1288: 1222: 1199: 1188: 1165: 1096: 1020: 968: 887: 866: 603: 548: 525: 474: 430: 394: 375: 339: 244:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the

197: 70: 55: 2920: 2629: 2131: 1668:

I think undoing your undo is right way to go, until then we need to put POV on that article.

2534: 2519: 2337: 967:

open proxies. Its not OK to make accusations about abusing open proxies without evidence.

851: 726: 570: 109: 94: 2797: 2672:

Lawrencekhoo, can you discuss your reintroduction of the image in Trickle-down economics.

2554: 2488: 2187:! Pack your bags and your laptop, and meet some fellow Malaysia Wikipedians in the meetup! 2134:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2127: 1450:, along with more on the talk page. Would you consider withdrawing the nomination? Thanks, 1443: 481:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

364:

http://www.thecrimson.harvard.edu/article/2005/7/15/hoxby-article-presents-slanted-veiw-of/

196:

Thanks for the note. My bad. Sorry, should have done more research before my revert. Best,

39: 2702: 2653: 2577: 2562: 2496: 1571: 933: 693: 689: 644: 499: 2825: 1853: 1085: 1016:

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.

711:

What objections do you have to the Bank of England Quarterly demystifying money creation?

2960: 2932: 2906: 2863: 2841: 2783: 2763: 2744: 2725: 2706: 2684: 2657: 2611: 2581: 2566: 2538: 2523: 2500: 2469: 2442: 2414: 2160: 2083: 2056: 2033: 2014: 1986: 1954: 1928: 1911: 1885: 1845: 1811: 1786: 1740: 1698:

Economists generally believe that deflation is a problem in a modern economy because...*

1681: 1630: 1606: 1588: 1559: 1524: 1497: 1478: 1459: 1425:. Please do NOT move my, or anyone else's comments to an "Extended Discussion" section. 1401: 1371: 1338: 1316: 1296: 1265: 1226: 1207: 1192: 1159: 1104: 1088:

that's not self-published. Anything not backed up with a reliable source can be removed.

1076: 1032: 976: 960: 926: 895: 874: 855: 823: 791: 755: 734: 701: 625: 611: 596: 574: 552: 533: 455: 438: 423: 402: 379: 347: 327: 284: 205: 190: 134: 120: 98: 78: 59: 2790: 2336:(The Church Historian's Press, which is an imprint of Deseret Book; 2016), notable? Is 2306: 2198: 2071: 2044: 2002: 1702:

No sources that support that statement. Link is bogus - and doesn't confirm statement.

1595: 907: 517: 338:) would be nice, but not necessary, since it's released to the public domain. Regards, 274: 131: 112: 1965: 1864:

awarded "Central Bank of Sweden" "Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences" 3 results

1618: 1240:

As can be seen by the RfCs listed on the RfC policy page, some are about questions of

782:

Thank you for participating in and supporting my RfA. It was very much appreciated.

218: 126:

Hi Lawrencekhoo, this is just a courtesy note to let you know that this case has been

2741: 2202: 1978: 1768: 1756: 1357: 1302: 1251: 783: 747: 2919:

I'll call a RfC if you insist, even though it's a waste of everyone's time, because

1532: 1121:

concerning Paul Singer (businessman), to which you were listed as a party, has been

769: 742:

I replied to your post on abortion in the modern liberalism article on my talk page.

2638:

might want to be bold in an edit on the talk pages so as not to start an edit war."

2329: 1547: 1470: 1451: 1218: 1184: 580: 544: 371: 51: 2101: 1011:

please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate.

2392:), and one of the purposes of an encyclopedia is to record that those syntheses ( 2713: 2677: 2530: 2515: 2021: 1429: 846: 566: 311: 104:

A request for Arbitration has been made for America: Imagine a World Without her

90: 34:

in removing material long in a BLP - and BRD says one revert - then you need to

2250: 688:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

2698: 2594:

policy or guideline. Also, it's doesn't imply that the first revert is free.

2342:

here: "The Mormon Council of Fifty: What Joseph Smith’s Secret Records Reveal"

1716:

3. Currently "Deflationary spiral" chapter is misleading. I changed it to: *A

948: 653: 516:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

2227: 2214: 944: 2302: 1997:

self-published hobbyists with their own interpretations? We'll need to ask

1648:

also ... Opposing opinion is also widespread among economists: (examples)

1423:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:List_of_Islamist_terrorist_attacks#rfc_EC3234A

808:

in World War II" to Spanish language and create a Spanish version article?

429:

Dear Gun Powder Ma, Please don't leave insults on my talk page. Thank you.

2456:

would be more in line with policy. If you do have time, please do join in

2452:

is a minor issue, although I believe linking "professional footballer" to

2287: 298: 2430: 2206: 334:

Please feel free to use it. An attribution to the Wikimedia common page (

2138:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1751: 1723:

I added relevant RS link to study done by economists Atkeson and Kehoe.

1543: 1091:

If you face any trouble, feel free to ask me for help, or to ask at the

2487:. Seriously???? You appear experienced an editor enough to be aware of 1536: 486: 335: 178: 2624:

WP:REVERT is neither a guideline nor a policy, but fine. I'll cite a

1876:

Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences". Hence we should not as well.

1870:

awarded "Central Bank of Sweden" "Nobel Prize in Economics" 9 results

1665:

effect is under question due to empirical and theoretical evidences.

657: 1969: 1692:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Deflation&action=history

1442:? Just a quick read through the article appears to show it meeting 2869:

you get to proclaim it by decree, it comes about as a result of a

2598:

reverter and reverted have a responsibility to work it out. See

1531:

The sources for the data is listed on the pages of the graphics.

2288:

Let's reduce the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement!

1861:

awarded "Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences" 1760 results

2388:

the Pacy and Caetano citations that don't fit your ivory-tower

2141:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

1271:

I can find nowhere that states that the RfC policy page should

50:

develops. Cheers. I suspect the discussion will be fruitful.

2448:

Thanks for your message. I agree that linking "footballer" to

2510:

Hi, can you point me in the direction of the discussion that

1731:

Can you please elaborate on why you twice undid those edits?

2171: 1661:

then you removed explanation of this: Actual existence of a

602:

Just go slow OK, you removed nearly half the article there.

110:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case

2648:, which is what feels "knee-jerk" to me. Just sayingggg... 1248:

Also, bad form to revert someone else on article talk page.

951:... which looks suspiciously like someone using a proxy. 2271:. If there is any enquires, feel free to discuss at the 943:

Assuming good faith of course that SRich is neither the

2948: 2771: 2645: 2641: 2511: 2484: 2122:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2068: 2001:

when the presentational issues will ever be resolved!

1691: 665: 661: 649: 521: 509: 505: 490: 156:

Category:American military personnel of the Vietnam War

32: 2334:

The Council of Fifty, Minutes, March 1844–January 1846

1709:

Opposing opinion is also widespread among economists:*

1275:

discuss changes to policy, and that discussions about

393:', then you'll be able to edit the Hoxby page. Rgds, 173:

Based on that background, are you OK with me removing

2828:. During the discussion, the article remains in the 660:

by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just

559:

Knowledge (XXG):Peer review/Norodom Sihanouk/archive1

539:

Contradiction on the fractional reserve banking page.

2397:

that it is indeed a record of a widely disseminated

2168:

Invitation to the Knowledge (XXG) Selangor Meetup 1

336:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:US_GDP_10-60.jpg

2947:I'll also note that you were the one to insert it, 2249:Malay language - for a special session to discuss 2420:Harry Beadles article, and football article leads 2246:English language - for the general overall meetup 1440:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Kodak Black 616:Ten percent, and that's why I went step by step. 673:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 2886:of the article, but even if it wasn't, you are 1867:awarded "Nobel Prize in Economics" 7240 results 684:including the US, UK, most ], East Asia and the 389:, you'll have to edit a bit more to become an ' 1852:On Knowledge (XXG) we have a rule, follow the 746:If you're really interested in discussing it. 256:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as 2774:. If it's approved, I will withdraw the RfC. 2674:Talk:Trickle-down_economics#Image_in_the_lead 804:Can you translate this English wiki article " 299:http://en.wikipedia.org/File:US_GDP_10-60.jpg 8: 2824:to re-revert it, which is the first step to 1301:It's your talk page, so you must be right. ― 89:Nice quote. Thanks for the help on research. 2263:and the invitation was written and sent by 1057:a crossfire and the effort will be wasted. 130:. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, 2282:(Delivered: 07:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)) 2253:(subject to enough number of participants) 1970:https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Lawrencekhoo 1936: 1893: 1827: 1510: 912: 809: 313: 2321:Notability within bios (more specifically 1975:Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences 1796:Hello Lawrence (I guess). Regarding the 1281:The original poster reverted my addition. 228:The Arbitration Committee has authorised 1687:Few more things about Deflation Article: 225:Please carefully read this information: 1438:Just wanted to check what was up with 1247: 1239: 1095:. Best of luck, and have fun editing! 940:are the only editors pressing for it. 816:2604:2000:6B45:500:9168:CE7E:6CBE:3250 2367:Edits to Full-reserve banking article 647:. I have automatically detected that 7: 2818:iscuss it on the article talk page, 2197:Venue: Sudo Brew, 7 Jalan SS 22/11, 2111:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 2634:"after a reversion of a bold edit, 2350:User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Suggested_fix 2124:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 2108:Hello, Lawrencekhoo. Voting in the 983:Formal mediation has been requested 919:2620:CC:8000:80:B8A0:AC65:7D8C:B16D 2847:You are actively violating policy 1594:Already done by someone else, see 1139:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution 212:BLP Discretionary sanctions notice 24: 2646:"are you trying to pick a fight?" 2644:(which it wasn't) is followed by 175:Category:Veterans of Foreign Wars 2267:. For more information, see the 2100: 1750: 768: 638: 468: 217: 2382:syntheses of published material 2181:Knowledge (XXG) Malaysia Meetup 1644:My change was addition of this: 1093:Economics wikiproject talk page 776:Hawkeye7 RfA Appreciation award 761:Thank you for supporting my RfA 297:I would like to use the figure 108:The request can be found here: 2514:suggestion came from, cheers. 2191:Date: Sunday, 11 December 2016 2020:Knowledge (XXG) is not like a 1792:Energy Conservation page edits 1787:03:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC) 1741:04:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC) 1682:02:07, 20 September 2016 (UTC) 1607:11:22, 20 September 2016 (UTC) 1111:Request for mediation rejected 575:03:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC) 1: 2259:This meetup was initiated by 2161:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 2084:19:20, 15 November 2016 (UTC) 2057:14:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC) 2034:14:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC) 2015:16:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC) 1987:11:23, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 1955:10:54, 20 November 2016 (UTC) 1144:For the Mediation Committee, 896:04:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC) 875:04:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC) 856:20:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC) 824:19:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC) 735:16:14, 21 November 2015 (UTC) 191:15:41, 28 February 2015 (UTC) 2311:21:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC) 1929:14:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC) 1912:10:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC) 1886:03:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC) 1846:22:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC) 1812:17:06, 8 November 2016 (UTC) 1720:is an imaginable situation* 1133:of the Committee, or to the 1119:request for formal mediation 1031:of the Mediation Committee. 792:22:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC) 756:02:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC) 702:10:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC) 626:15:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC) 612:15:00, 28 October 2015 (UTC) 597:14:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC) 135:06:57, 7 February 2015 (UTC) 121:17:28, 27 January 2015 (UTC) 99:04:03, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2961:07:27, 19 August 2017 (UTC) 2933:07:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC) 2907:05:38, 19 August 2017 (UTC) 2873:discussion between editors. 2864:04:33, 19 August 2017 (UTC) 2842:04:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC) 2145:and submit your choices on 1631:21:53, 31 August 2016 (UTC) 906:I see your edition in page 902:Forty or 2000 page per day? 79:09:07, 6 January 2015 (UTC) 60:13:00, 2 January 2015 (UTC) 2981: 2784:07:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC) 2764:07:35, 1 August 2017 (UTC) 2745:07:33, 1 August 2017 (UTC) 2712:Please read the guideline 2481:Redirect your efforts here 2362:19:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC) 2153:MediaWiki message delivery 2143:the candidates' statements 1589:14:50, 5 August 2016 (UTC) 1067:Thank you for your time. 949:middle of nowhere China IP 690:these opt-out instructions 456:05:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC) 439:01:32, 27 April 2015 (UTC) 424:17:28, 23 April 2015 (UTC) 403:05:20, 20 April 2015 (UTC) 380:04:01, 16 April 2015 (UTC) 348:04:35, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 328:20:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC) 246:purpose of Knowledge (XXG) 2726:14:36, 13 June 2017 (UTC) 2707:10:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC) 2590:Just to note that BRD is 2415:14:35, 5 April 2017 (UTC) 2403:go ahead and rearrange it 2243:Medium of communication: 1560:02:06, 13 July 2016 (UTC) 1542:You get find them online 1525:15:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC) 1460:15:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC) 1402:06:16, 28 June 2016 (UTC) 1372:06:09, 28 June 2016 (UTC) 1339:06:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC) 1317:06:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC) 1297:05:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC) 1266:05:52, 28 June 2016 (UTC) 1227:14:31, 27 June 2016 (UTC) 1208:01:11, 27 June 2016 (UTC) 1193:12:19, 24 June 2016 (UTC) 1172:the Mediation Committee.) 1160:09:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC) 1105:00:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC) 1041:new user needing guidance 1007:guide to formal mediation 767: 713:Quarterly Bulletin 2014Q1 464:Reference errors on 4 May 285:07:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 206:03:40, 3 March 2015 (UTC) 152:a hatnote to the category 31:The "bold edit" was yours 2685:03:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC) 2346:Religion & Politics, 1817:Nobel Prize in Economics 1498:14:14, 4 July 2016 (UTC) 1479:09:21, 4 July 2016 (UTC) 1077:17:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC) 1033:20:24, 31 May 2016 (UTC) 977:12:58, 31 May 2016 (UTC) 961:02:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC) 945:University Of Chicago IP 806:Big Four of Allied power 553:16:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC) 522:report it to my operator 148:Veterans of Foreign Wars 2658:15:19, 9 May 2017 (UTC) 2612:05:41, 9 May 2017 (UTC) 2582:01:49, 9 May 2017 (UTC) 2567:01:40, 9 May 2017 (UTC) 2539:06:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC) 2524:18:59, 8 May 2017 (UTC) 2501:18:53, 8 May 2017 (UTC) 2470:02:29, 7 May 2017 (UTC) 2443:02:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC) 2354:Hodgdon's secret garden 2228:3.131694°N 101.621222°E 1636:Undoing Deflation edits 1003:formal mediation policy 927:14:55, 5 May 2016 (UTC) 666:my operator's talk page 534:00:27, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 230:discretionary sanctions 2176: 1992:"Presentational Issue" 1127:mediation request page 953:Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz 479:automatically detected 18:User talk:Lawrencekhoo 2194:Time: 12:00 - 2:00 pm 2175: 2120:Arbitration Committee 2093:ArbCom Elections 2016 1761:neutral point of view 1019:Message delivered by 250:standards of behavior 142:Al Gore & the VFW 2642:"not an improvement" 2454:association football 2450:association football 2427:association football 2380:to the content) The 2294:Environmental impact 2233:3.131694; 101.621222 656:may have broken the 495:empty citation error 258:editing restrictions 2384:ocurred elsewhere ( 2275:or at the Facebook 2183:had now arrived on 1798:energy conservation 1718:deflationary spiral 1663:deflationary spiral 1656:deflationary spiral 1235:RfC policy category 991:Mediation Committee 863:User:Nicolaas Smith 839:Talk:Hyperinflation 832:Talk:Hyperinflation 391:auto-confirmed user 294:Dear Lawrencekhoo, 2806:old edit has been 2754:the right venue? 2692:Lin-Manuel Miranda 2668:Trickle-down image 2340:, who reviews him 2316:Please do chime in 2177: 2136:arbitration policy 2095:: Voting now open! 1962:Socialsciencesguru 1943:Socialsciencesguru 1900:Socialsciencesguru 1834:Socialsciencesguru 1486:Dispute resolution 454: 451:Pericles of Athens 2688: 2284: 1957: 1941:comment added by 1914: 1898:comment added by 1848: 1832:comment added by 1804:RobbieIanMorrison 1527: 1515:comment added by 1173: 1035: 929: 917:comment added by 826: 814:comment added by 797: 796: 738: 721:comment added by 503: 448: 330: 318:comment added by 283: 158:. (Gore actually 2972: 2682: 2680: 2639: 2552: 2338:Benjamin E. Park 2280: 2251:ms.wikipedia.org 2239: 2238: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2229: 2225: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2217: 2104: 2076: 2049: 2007: 1854:reliable sources 1754: 1586: 1583: 1580: 1577: 1574: 1369: 1364: 1314: 1309: 1263: 1258: 1163: 1156: 1150: 1018: 772: 765: 764: 737: 715: 683: 678:In most regions 669: 642: 641: 497: 472: 471: 452: 281: 277: 221: 183:RevelationDirect 2980: 2979: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2830:status quo ante 2794: 2734: 2694: 2678: 2670: 2633: 2550: 2547: 2508: 2478: 2458:the discussion 2422: 2369: 2318: 2301:? Thank you, -- 2290: 2232: 2230: 2226: 2223: 2218: 2215: 2213: 2211: 2210: 2170: 2165: 2164: 2148:the voting page 2105: 2097: 2072: 2045: 2003: 1994: 1977:article page). 1819: 1794: 1748: 1705:2. Removal of 1689: 1638: 1623:Midnightblueowl 1615: 1613:Manual of Style 1584: 1581: 1578: 1575: 1572: 1568: 1506: 1467: 1433: 1418: 1367: 1358: 1312: 1303: 1261: 1252: 1237: 1181: 1176: 1175: 1154: 1146: 1142: 1113: 1086:reliable source 1043: 1038: 1037: 1014: 985: 937: 934:Murray Rothbard 904: 835: 802: 800:For Translation 763: 744: 716: 709: 679: 648: 639: 636: 584: 562: 541: 469: 466: 450: 411: 356: 292: 279: 272: 271: 222: 214: 168:WP:NON-DEFINING 144: 106: 87: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2978: 2976: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2892:to wait for a 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2796:Please review 2793: 2791:Jevons paradox 2788: 2787: 2786: 2767: 2766: 2736:Lawrencekhoo: 2733: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2693: 2690: 2669: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2585: 2584: 2555:WP:BRD#Process 2546: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2507: 2504: 2477: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2421: 2418: 2390:weltanschauung 2368: 2365: 2326: 2325: 2322: 2317: 2314: 2289: 2286: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2247: 2241: 2199:Damansara Jaya 2195: 2192: 2169: 2166: 2106: 2099: 2098: 2096: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2037: 2036: 1993: 1990: 1932: 1931: 1889: 1888: 1872: 1871: 1868: 1865: 1862: 1858: 1857: 1818: 1815: 1793: 1790: 1767:. Thank you. 1747: 1746:September 2016 1744: 1729: 1728: 1711: 1710: 1700: 1699: 1688: 1685: 1646: 1645: 1637: 1634: 1614: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1567: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1540: 1505: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1466: 1465:Widthdrawn RfC 1463: 1432: 1427: 1417: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1277:implementation 1244:of the policy. 1242:implementation 1236: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1211: 1210: 1180: 1177: 1164:(Delivered by 1162: 1148:TransporterMan 1116: 1115: 1114: 1112: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1089: 1069:24.249.186.213 1042: 1039: 1017: 988: 987: 986: 984: 981: 980: 979: 936: 931: 908:Printing Press 903: 900: 899: 898: 885: 878: 877: 834: 828: 801: 798: 795: 794: 779: 778: 773: 762: 759: 743: 740: 708: 707:Money Creation 705: 686: 685: 675: 674: 635: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 583: 578: 561: 556: 540: 537: 518:false positive 514: 513: 465: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 442: 441: 410: 409:Printing press 407: 406: 405: 387:semi-protected 355: 354:Caroline Hoxby 352: 351: 350: 291: 288: 252:, or relevant 223: 216: 215: 213: 210: 209: 208: 143: 140: 139: 138: 105: 102: 86: 83: 82: 81: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2977: 2962: 2958: 2954: 2949: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2934: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2899:Beyond My Ken 2895: 2891: 2890: 2885: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2872: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2861: 2857: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2834:Beyond My Ken 2831: 2827: 2823: 2822: 2817: 2816: 2811: 2810: 2805: 2804: 2800:. When your 2799: 2792: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2768: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2743: 2742:Dirk Beetstra 2739: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2691: 2689: 2687: 2686: 2681: 2675: 2667: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2637: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2505: 2503: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2485:"why revert?" 2482: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2435:Kaiser matias 2432: 2428: 2419: 2417: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2407:62.253.25.110 2404: 2400: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2366: 2364: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2323: 2320: 2319: 2315: 2313: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2295: 2285: 2283: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2252: 2248: 2245: 2244: 2242: 2237: 2219:101°37′16.4″E 2208: 2204: 2203:Petaling Jaya 2200: 2196: 2193: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2186: 2182: 2174: 2167: 2163: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2149: 2144: 2139: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2116: 2113: 2112: 2103: 2094: 2091: 2085: 2082: 2081: 2077: 2075: 2069: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2058: 2055: 2054: 2050: 2048: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2013: 2012: 2008: 2006: 2000: 1991: 1989: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1958: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1874: 1873: 1869: 1866: 1863: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1825: 1816: 1814: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1799: 1791: 1789: 1788: 1784: 1783: 1778: 1777: 1772: 1771: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1753: 1745: 1743: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1721: 1719: 1714: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1703: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1693: 1686: 1684: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1669: 1666: 1664: 1659: 1657: 1652: 1649: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1635: 1633: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1587: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1517:80.174.132.72 1514: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1464: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1436: 1431: 1428: 1426: 1424: 1415: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1373: 1370: 1365: 1363: 1362: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1318: 1315: 1310: 1308: 1307: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1264: 1259: 1257: 1256: 1249: 1245: 1243: 1234: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1179:Systemic bias 1178: 1174: 1171: 1167: 1161: 1157: 1151: 1149: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1087: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1065: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1040: 1036: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 982: 978: 974: 970: 965: 964: 963: 962: 958: 954: 950: 946: 941: 935: 932: 930: 928: 924: 920: 916: 909: 901: 897: 893: 889: 886: 884: 880: 879: 876: 872: 868: 864: 860: 859: 858: 857: 853: 849: 848: 842: 840: 833: 829: 827: 825: 821: 817: 813: 807: 799: 793: 789: 785: 781: 780: 777: 774: 771: 766: 760: 758: 757: 753: 749: 741: 739: 736: 732: 728: 724: 720: 714: 706: 704: 703: 699: 695: 691: 682: 677: 676: 672: 671: 670: 667: 663: 662:edit the page 659: 655: 651: 646: 634:November 2015 633: 627: 623: 619: 618:207.93.13.150 615: 614: 613: 609: 605: 601: 600: 599: 598: 594: 590: 589:207.93.13.150 582: 579: 577: 576: 572: 568: 560: 557: 555: 554: 550: 546: 538: 536: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 511: 507: 501: 496: 492: 488: 484: 483: 482: 480: 476: 463: 457: 453: 446: 445: 444: 443: 440: 436: 432: 428: 427: 426: 425: 421: 417: 416:Gun Powder Ma 408: 404: 400: 396: 392: 388: 384: 383: 382: 381: 377: 373: 367: 365: 360: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 332: 331: 329: 325: 321: 320:64.134.67.104 317: 312: 308: 305: 302: 300: 295: 289: 287: 286: 282: 276: 269: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 238: 236: 231: 226: 220: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 194: 193: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 171: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 141: 136: 133: 129: 125: 124: 123: 122: 118: 114: 111: 103: 101: 100: 96: 92: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 62: 61: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 26: 19: 2894:WP:Consensus 2888: 2887: 2883: 2871:WP:CONSENSUS 2829: 2826:edit warring 2820: 2819: 2814: 2813: 2808: 2807: 2802: 2801: 2795: 2751: 2735: 2695: 2683: 2671: 2635: 2625: 2595: 2591: 2548: 2509: 2479: 2476:Kind of Blue 2423: 2402: 2398: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2370: 2345: 2333: 2332:, editor of 2330:Matthew Grow 2327: 2291: 2281: 2258: 2184: 2180: 2178: 2146: 2140: 2117: 2109: 2107: 2079: 2073: 2052: 2046: 2022:game of Risk 2010: 2004: 1995: 1959: 1937:— Preceding 1933: 1894:— Preceding 1890: 1828:— Preceding 1820: 1795: 1781: 1775: 1769: 1765:my talk page 1749: 1730: 1722: 1717: 1715: 1712: 1704: 1701: 1690: 1674:192.55.54.36 1672:of commits. 1670: 1667: 1662: 1660: 1655: 1653: 1650: 1647: 1639: 1616: 1569: 1566:Federal debt 1511:— Preceding 1507: 1468: 1437: 1434: 1419: 1416:RFC comments 1360: 1359: 1305: 1304: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1254: 1253: 1241: 1238: 1182: 1170:on behalf of 1166:MediationBot 1147: 1143: 1135:mailing list 1079:Owen Paepke 1066: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1044: 1021:MediationBot 1015: 1010: 999:request page 942: 938: 913:— Preceding 905: 845: 843: 836: 830:Refactor at 810:— Preceding 803: 775: 745: 717:— Preceding 710: 687: 680: 637: 585: 581:Peter Schiff 563: 542: 526:ReferenceBot 515: 510:Ask for help 478: 475:ReferenceBot 467: 412: 368: 361: 357: 314:— Preceding 309: 306: 303: 296: 293: 273: 239: 227: 224: 172: 159: 146:Hello, The 145: 107: 88: 66: 48:WP:CONSENSUS 43: 35: 30: 2770:I just did 2732:wrong venue 2714:MOS:BLPLEAD 2506:Trevor Ford 2269:meetup page 1755:Hello, I'm 1504:Information 1488:or at ANI. 1430:Kodak Black 1283:One cannot 881:Also this: 643:Hello, I'm 473:Hello, I'm 310:Dan Jelski 307:Thank you, 2884:status quo 2853:WP:BRD-NOT 2832:. Thanks, 2328:I.e. - Is 2277:event page 2216:3°7′54.1″N 2132:topic bans 1005:, and the 694:BracketBot 692:. Thanks, 654:Tablespoon 645:BracketBot 524:. Thanks, 520:, you can 493:caused an 242:uninvolved 2626:guideline 2600:WP:REVERT 2491:, RIGHT? 2378:intrinsic 2273:talk page 2261:Chongkian 2128:site bans 2074:SPECIFICO 2047:SPECIFICO 2005:SPECIFICO 995:Mediation 650:your edit 491:your edit 477:. I have 275:Dreadstar 181:article? 177:from the 164:WP:COPDEF 132:Lankiveil 113:Casprings 2889:required 2849:WP:UNDUE 2431:football 2265:NgYShung 2207:Selangor 2185:Selangor 2179:The 3rd 1979:NPalgan2 1951:contribs 1939:unsigned 1908:contribs 1896:unsigned 1842:contribs 1830:unsigned 1770:Snuggums 1757:SNUGGUMS 1733:Hamdui24 1513:unsigned 1361:Mandruss 1306:Mandruss 1255:Mandruss 1131:Chairman 1123:declined 947:nor the 915:unsigned 812:unsigned 784:Hawkeye7 748:VictorD7 731:contribs 719:unsigned 316:unsigned 254:policies 128:declined 85:Georgism 2921:WP:SNOW 2630:WP:BOLD 2545:RE: FYI 1471:Marteau 1452:Mdann52 1219:EllenCT 1185:EllenCT 545:Reissgo 487:Cao Cao 485:On the 372:Rubric6 179:Al Gore 52:Collect 36:discuss 2798:WP:BRD 2679:Morphh 2531:Kosack 2516:Kosack 2489:WP:BRD 2483:. And 1999:Watson 1968:here: 1448:NMUSIC 1285:revert 1029:behalf 1001:, the 847:C.Fred 723:WouNur 658:syntax 567:Mr Tan 489:page, 290:Figure 266:blocks 248:, our 91:Whomyl 40:WP:BLP 27:warren 2699:JDDJS 2650:Dan56 2574:Dan56 2559:Dan56 2493:Dan56 2067:Um... 1919:so. 1782:edits 1651:then 1027:) on 264:, or 67:twice 42:does 16:< 2957:talk 2929:talk 2903:talk 2860:talk 2838:talk 2780:talk 2772:this 2760:talk 2722:talk 2703:talk 2654:talk 2608:talk 2596:Both 2578:talk 2563:talk 2535:talk 2520:talk 2512:THIS 2497:talk 2466:talk 2439:talk 2411:talk 2399:view 2394:i.e. 2386:e.g. 2358:talk 2307:talk 2303:Gnom 2299:here 2157:talk 2118:The 2080:talk 2053:talk 2030:talk 2011:talk 1983:talk 1966:WP:V 1947:talk 1925:talk 1904:talk 1882:talk 1838:talk 1808:talk 1776:talk 1737:talk 1678:talk 1627:talk 1619:here 1603:talk 1556:talk 1548:here 1546:and 1544:here 1537:here 1535:and 1533:Here 1521:talk 1494:talk 1475:talk 1456:talk 1446:and 1435:Hi, 1398:talk 1335:talk 1293:talk 1273:only 1223:talk 1204:talk 1189:talk 1155:TALK 1117:The 1101:talk 1073:talk 1025:talk 989:The 973:talk 957:talk 923:talk 892:talk 871:talk 852:talk 820:talk 788:talk 752:talk 727:talk 698:talk 622:talk 608:talk 593:talk 571:talk 549:talk 530:talk 500:help 435:talk 420:talk 399:talk 376:talk 344:talk 324:talk 262:bans 235:here 202:talk 187:talk 117:talk 95:talk 75:talk 56:talk 2821:not 2636:you 2602:-- 2592:not 2374:not 2352:.-- 2224:/ 2070:🐮 1960:Hi 1444:GNG 652:to 506:Fix 504:. ( 170:.) 160:was 44:not 2959:) 2953:LK 2931:) 2925:LK 2905:) 2862:) 2856:LK 2840:) 2782:) 2776:LK 2762:) 2756:LK 2752:is 2724:) 2718:LK 2705:) 2656:) 2632:: 2628:, 2610:) 2604:LK 2580:) 2565:) 2557:) 2537:) 2522:) 2499:) 2468:) 2462:LK 2441:) 2413:) 2360:) 2309:) 2279:. 2231:/ 2205:, 2201:, 2159:) 2151:. 2130:, 2032:) 2026:LK 1985:) 1953:) 1949:• 1927:) 1921:LK 1910:) 1906:• 1884:) 1878:LK 1844:) 1840:• 1810:) 1785:) 1779:/ 1739:) 1680:) 1654:A 1629:) 1605:) 1599:LK 1597:. 1585:py 1582:Co 1579:n 1576:ea 1573:Cl 1558:) 1552:LK 1550:. 1523:) 1496:) 1490:LK 1477:) 1458:) 1400:) 1394:LK 1337:) 1331:LK 1295:) 1289:LK 1225:) 1206:) 1200:LK 1191:) 1168:, 1158:) 1141:. 1103:) 1097:LK 1075:) 1009:, 975:) 969:LK 959:) 925:) 894:) 888:LK 873:) 867:LK 854:) 822:) 790:) 754:) 733:) 729:• 700:) 624:) 610:) 604:LK 595:) 573:) 551:) 532:) 508:| 437:) 431:LK 422:) 401:) 395:LK 378:) 346:) 340:LK 326:) 260:, 237:. 204:) 198:LK 189:) 119:) 97:) 77:) 71:LK 58:) 2955:( 2927:( 2901:( 2858:( 2836:( 2815:D 2809:R 2803:B 2778:( 2758:( 2720:( 2701:( 2652:( 2606:( 2576:( 2561:( 2553:( 2533:( 2518:( 2495:( 2464:( 2437:( 2409:( 2356:( 2344:( 2305:( 2240:) 2209:( 2155:( 2028:( 1981:( 1945:( 1923:( 1902:( 1880:( 1836:( 1806:( 1773:( 1735:( 1676:( 1625:( 1601:( 1554:( 1539:. 1519:( 1492:( 1473:( 1454:( 1396:( 1368:☎ 1333:( 1313:☎ 1291:( 1262:☎ 1221:( 1202:( 1187:( 1152:( 1099:( 1071:( 1023:( 971:( 955:( 921:( 890:( 869:( 850:( 818:( 786:( 750:( 725:( 696:( 681:( 668:. 620:( 606:( 591:( 569:( 547:( 528:( 512:) 502:) 498:( 433:( 418:( 397:( 374:( 342:( 322:( 280:☥ 200:( 185:( 166:/ 137:. 115:( 93:( 73:( 54:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index