702:, on the explanation that it's no longer stub sized. Maybe someday my little toddler will be within striking distance of the Daily Feature club. When that day arrives, I might be knocking on your door for some pointers and recommendations for finishing school. Don't take too long a break, they grow up before you know it! I'm glad we've finally gotten past the old days here. I intend to reply at least one more time at Lost/Fansites though, so do keep a handle on it for a while. See ya. --
316:
a fair use rationale and make the image appropriate for use on wikipedia. I don't know why you think it is fair use other than what you have told me. I'm not sure if this is an appropriate fair use of the image so I can't write the rationale. I will be happy to collaborate with you on a fair use rationale and help with any wording you might suggest but the rationale is supposed to be your opinion. I hope that we can sort out this relatively minor issue without too much more discussion.--
31:
410:
policies and guidelines involved despite not having been an editor here since 2003. Thanks for your advice about how to spend my time as an editor, but I'm afraid I'm going to choose to disregard it. I strongly believe that keeping wikipedia free for reproduction is a valuable goal and enforcing fair use policy is essential in achieving this. This is not the only way I spend my time as an editor and I do make plenty of content edits.
172:. Am I truly, as Elonka states, the last holdout? I'd appreciate anything you have to contribute, either on this page or to me on my talk page. Right now, I'm "going it alone", which is never all that fun. I'm leaving a similar note on Jtrost's talk page. Just wondering if you two have changed your view, or gotten weary of the struggle, or what. Thanks. --
190:
507:: "Important Note: When a page is particularly high profile, either because it is linked off the main page, or because it has recently received a prominent link from offsite, it will often become a target for vandalism. It is not appropriate to protect pages in this case. Instead, consider adding them to your watchlist, and reverting vandalism yourself."
315:
The image was returned previously. However, I tagged it as orphaned after removing it from the article a second time. I removed it because it still has no fair use rationale, I see you have re-added it. I will not get involved in a revert war with you about this. I really am trying to help you create
409:
Thank you for pointing out the policy about users editing their own talk pages, I've now read this and will bear it in mind. I was wrong about that and I apologise. I am not wrong about fair use rationales. This is an area of wikipedia that I have a good level of experience with and I understand the
405:
I don't think deleting images improves the content. I do think that it is important to have a fair use rationale for fair use images. In encouraging you to produce a fair use rationale I hope to improve content. Deleting the images from the article is necessitated by your failure to produce the fair
346:
Opark, please take this with due consideration, I'm sure you consider it "improving the article" to remove images, but I consider it a failure to understand some basic
Knowledge (XXG) principles. Rather than tagging images you deem not to meet your standards for fair use, perhaps you might consider
422:
has left a comment on my talk page clearly explaining the policy if you want reassurance that I am not the only one who think fair use images need fair use rationales (see: fair use policy criteria 10). The policy also clearly states that the uploader or the person adding the image must create the
413:
I really think that saying that I am trying to annoy you by notifying you when I tag an image you uploaded is a failure to assume good faith and that is why I reminded you of the policy. I'm sorry if that was pedantic in your view, I am finding out that it is often necessary to be pedantic when it
608:
I will spend the next days reading through what you've given me to chew on. Thank you, again, for all your hard work. Whatever happens with the AfD and the Lost external links doesn't really interest me much at this point. I hope one day to contribute to the Lost article in a meaningful way. When
634:
On my end, this three-month episode started off rewarding and energizing. When it petered out without resolution, I was disappointed. The latest festivities at AfD2:Lostpedia have been a source of immense pleasure to me. I've learned quite a bit about
Knowledge (XXG) behind the curtain, and I do
724:
581:
I'm sorry to hear that this
Lostpedia business has sapped your motivation. (I mean that sincerely.) For me, it's become my way of learning my way around Knowledge (XXG) Level 2. Honestly, I'm not really all that committed to any particular outcome of this whole saga. No-one really cares
269:
I removed the image from the thematic motifs article and tagged it as orphaned because it still has no fair use rationale. Without a rationale it is inappropriate for use on wikipedia and should be deleted. I like the image and hope it will get a fair use rationale so it can
546:
351:. Incidentally, you might want to note that I'm been editing on Knowledge (XXG) since 2003. I'm well familiar with policy; stating "Please remember that we assume good faith here at wikipedia" comes off as pedantic. (You may want to note that
306:
I'm sorry if my attempt to improve content for the article is annoying you, that was not my intention. I have struck through the standardised template text as a good faith gesture seeing as you have stated that you feel it is inappropriate.
347:
focusing on actual editing of article in areas you're familiar with. It's clear that the images chosen are discussed in the text, and that the images are identified as to their source. If you feel that's not enough, I'll again suggest:
233:' has recently been nominated as a candidate to become a featured article. Should it become a featured article, it will be possible for the article to appear on the Knowledge (XXG) main page on March 10th 2007, the 10th anniversary of
452:
Thanks for the warning on the fansite issue. I was merely including a good example for Wiki users to check out and understand, and had no idea that was considered vandalism. I will refrain from adding links like that in the future.
363:
without cause, as this may be seen as uncivil; however, the excessive template you placed on my page was not such a case. Removing it was most certainly not vandalism, and your claim as such seems to indicate some misunderstanding of
423:
rationale although anyone can contribute. I am not sure that this is a fair use of the image so I cannot priovide a rationale. I can help you with the formatting/wording and am happy to do so if you just get the ball rolling.--
380:
Most users treat their user talk pages like regular talk pages, and archive the contents periodically to a personal subpage — either when the page gets too large, on a regular schedule, or when they take a wikivacation.
311:
I used the template because the tags suggested I do so, the edit was not nonsense or intended to upset you just to notify you that I had replaced the tag. Please remember that we assume good faith here at wikipedia.
625:"For example, if you've just gone through the process of writing a book and dealing with lawyers about a potentially controversial book, consider working on related articles like index or publishing or libel."
216:
738:
Please accept this award as a token of my gratitude for your grace under pressure. I hope you weren't too distressed when you spent all that time crafting your exceptionally helpful reply to my question.
665:
actually on extended Wiki-break, but the continued discussion about
Lostpedia just further emphasised that it's time for me to move on. I don't know when or if I'll be editing about
169:
414:
comes to fair use issues. Please can we focus our discussion on creating a fair use rationale. This is not a personal view of mine, as I think you might believe, this is in fact
669:
again; a number of the editors who helped shape the article over the past two years are no longer active there. Not to toot my own horn, but I've shepherded it through
635:
enjoy a good scrap. Unfortunately, not everyone experiences the same event in the same way. I only hope you can get your groove back, and enjoy the bad with the good.
80:
One of my reverts was of a banned user's (Alienus( sock puppet. I would appreciate it if you would respond to my arguments for my position rather than just reverting.
359:") Finally, users are given leeway in editing their own talk pages, and allowed to remove comments they feel are inappropriate. Users are advised not to remove
280:
With all due respect, please stop annoying me by re-inserting inaccurate tags and filling my talk page with excess template text. The image you have tagged was
456:
As a substitute, would it be possible to build a Wiki page of LOST fan video examples, and link to that so that Wiki users could see examples of these works?
605:
get worked up about a perceived problem with how conflict is handled. I'm not saying anyone is right or wrong here, I'm just explaining my motivations here.
627:
Now I'm making it explicit: I've recently been working on a renovation project, employing an interesting technique for interior walls, so I started a brand
94:. he refuses to engage in discussion to build consensus and gives evidence that others reject or find faulty and he ignores that and just reverts. --
285:
238:
62:
435:
has actually made a first pass at a rationale. I'm going to improve the format a little. I wonder if there is anything you want to add.--
562:
534:
488:
330:
206:
468:
613:
699:
Leflyman, It seems like only yesterday my little article was just a baby. But then along comes Xhin and removes its stub template
357:
Accusing the other side in a conflict of failing to assuming good faith can, itself, be a form of failing to assume good faith.
126:
670:
620:
annually, around
Halloween. In honor of you. I'd say quite a number of Wikipedians could do with a similar personal policy.
91:
168:
Hey, I've noticed that you've stayed out of the more recent discussion, largely, on episode articles vs. season articles
609:
that day comes, I would like to think I'll be received graciously, by whomever is keeping shop over there at that time.
545:
You might be interested to know that a particpant in the
Lostpedia AfD nominated 30+ articles i created for deletion..
69:
38:
288:. If you feel that the image is still lacking what you deem enough "Fair Use rationale" please be ever so good to
230:
127:
Talk:Zionist_political_violence#I_write_this_comment_out_of_sheer_desperation:_want_to_change_a_terrorism_title
649:
P.S. I'm guessing the "on vacation" shingle in your user page is derelict. You might want to check into that.
559:
531:
485:
203:
114:
110:
556:
528:
482:
200:
156:
141:
623:
If you've been monitoring my activities, you may have noticed a subtle nod to a line in that essay:
723:
677:
at the beginning of this month. Barring some major catastrophe, from here, it's just maintenance.--
508:
752:
740:
703:
641:
716:
I'm still looking into the materials you provided. In the meanwhile, there's this little matter:
658:
58:
47:
17:
549:- some of the Lostpedians have also joined in the debate, the math just doesnt add up for me :\
152:
137:
81:
292:
based on the extensive discussion already made. It's a wiki; you can edit the images, too. --
547:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/The New and
Improved Carl Morrissey (The 4400 episode)
415:
352:
90:
I have to say that this gentleman is doing 3rr violations all over, he just did his 3rd on
419:
504:
628:
372:
680:
436:
424:
390:
334:
317:
295:
271:
309:
Please do not remove it as removing content from talk pages is considered vandalism.
253:
95:
755:
743:
706:
685:
644:
567:
539:
511:
493:
439:
427:
395:
337:
320:
300:
274:
256:
210:
176:
151:
Well, thanks for listening anyway. I am going to unwatch your page. Best wishes.
145:
98:
84:
475:
For your great editing and helping new people i award you the Lost barnstar :-)
432:
326:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
601:
I don't get worked up about a particular line item in a particular article. I
173:
467:
186:
Thank you very much for the barnstar, i'll put it on my userpage now
244:
Any feedback you can offer to improve the article and/or to either
673:, getting it ready to be a Featured article, all the way to being
590:
care that much, as we seem to have met every one of them lately.)
466:
616:
and have taken it to heart. In fact, I loosely resolve to read
133:
61:, copying the section you are replying to if necessary. (See
25:
383:
Others delete comments after they have responded to them.
170:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Requests for mediation/Lost episodes
700:
674:
406:
use rationale after being given fair notice and time.
281:
117:
109:
I am messaging you because you were the user who moved
265:
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Pilot2backgammon.jpg)
661:, and congratulations on your first new article! I
521:Hey Lefly, do you use msn messenegr or AIM :-) ?
132:In this page's case, is there anyway to avoid a
229:You maybe interested to know that the article '
252:the nomination, would be wonderful. Thanks --
284:, and returned. See additional discussion at
8:
286:Awyong_Jeffrey_Mordecai_Salleh's talk page
63:Knowledge (XXG):How to archive a talk page
721:
586:about a tiny detail. (Maybe I should say
164:Episode vs. season articles: your view
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
612:I have read the essay you mentioned,
7:
614:Knowledge (XXG):Beware_of_the_tigers
574:An open letter to Leflyman from Loqi
333:for help in resolving this matter.--
187:
331:User:Awyong_Jeffrey_Mordecai_Salleh
217:Featured article candidate review:
24:
722:
188:
29:
657:Thank you for your comments on
105:Terrorism to Political violence
440:07:53, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
428:07:35, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
396:21:51, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
373:Help:Talk_page#User_talk_pages
338:21:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
321:20:30, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
301:17:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
275:09:20, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
257:18:18, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
211:08:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
177:20:49, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
136:and still get a title change?
92:list of political philosophers
1:
349:add the missing info yourself
146:16:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
99:02:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
756:16:09, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
744:16:09, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
707:04:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
686:04:05, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
645:00:35, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
568:18:26, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
540:07:29, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
471:In recognition of excellence
282:already examined by an admin
512:14:53, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
494:07:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
85:18:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
70:User_talk:Leflyman/Archive8
68:Next archival selection is
771:
732:The Working Man's Barnstar
241:" aired March 10th 1997).
728:
631:on the topic. It's fun!
499:Protecting visible pages
239:Welcome to the Hellmouth
231:Buffy the Vampire Slayer
751:Nice work, Leflyman. --
712:Still at the library...
593:It's not so much about
472:
115:Talk:Zionist militancy
111:Talk:Zionist terrorism
470:
42:of past discussions.
459:Thanks, Dulcimerist
599:doing what's right.
57:Post replies to my
683:
473:
393:
298:
18:User talk:Leflyman
749:
748:
679:
675:the FA of the Day
566:
538:
492:
389:
294:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
762:
726:
719:
718:
684:
671:two Peer Reviews
638:Very sincerely,
565:
550:
537:
522:
491:
476:
416:wikipedia policy
394:
299:
237:(the premiere, "
209:
193:
192:
191:
33:
32:
26:
770:
769:
765:
764:
763:
761:
760:
759:
714:
697:
678:
655:
597:as it is about
595:getting my way,
578:Dear Leflyman,
576:
563:52278 Alpha 771
557:Fenton, Matthew
551:
535:52278 Alpha 771
529:Fenton, Matthew
523:
519:
501:
489:52278 Alpha 771
483:Fenton, Matthew
477:
465:
447:
388:
293:
290:add it yourself
267:
224:
207:52278 Alpha 771
201:Fenton, Matthew
195:
189:
184:
166:
107:
78:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
768:
766:
747:
746:
735:
734:
729:
727:
713:
710:
696:
689:
654:
651:
575:
572:
571:
570:
518:
515:
500:
497:
464:
461:
446:
443:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
366:
365:
342:
304:
303:
266:
263:
261:
223:
214:
183:
180:
165:
162:
161:
160:
130:
129:
106:
103:
102:
101:
77:
74:
59:main talk page
56:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
767:
758:
757:
754:
745:
742:
737:
736:
733:
730:
725:
720:
717:
711:
709:
708:
705:
701:
694:
690:
688:
687:
682:
676:
672:
668:
664:
660:
652:
650:
647:
646:
643:
639:
636:
632:
630:
626:
621:
619:
615:
610:
606:
604:
600:
596:
591:
589:
585:
579:
573:
569:
564:
561:
558:
554:
548:
544:
543:
542:
541:
536:
533:
530:
526:
516:
514:
513:
510:
506:
498:
496:
495:
490:
487:
484:
480:
469:
462:
460:
457:
454:
450:
449:Hi Leflyman,
444:
442:
441:
438:
434:
430:
429:
426:
421:
417:
411:
407:
397:
392:
386:
384:
377:
376:
374:
370:
369:
368:
367:
362:
358:
355:points out, "
354:
350:
345:
344:
343:
340:
339:
336:
332:
328:
323:
322:
319:
313:
310:
302:
297:
291:
287:
283:
279:
278:
277:
276:
273:
264:
262:
259:
258:
255:
251:
247:
242:
240:
236:
232:
227:
222:
220:
215:
213:
212:
208:
205:
202:
198:
181:
179:
178:
175:
171:
163:
158:
154:
150:
149:
148:
147:
143:
139:
135:
128:
125:
124:
123:
122:Please see:
120:
118:
116:
112:
104:
100:
97:
93:
89:
88:
87:
86:
83:
75:
73:
71:
66:
64:
60:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
750:
731:
715:
698:
692:
666:
662:
659:my talk page
656:
648:
640:
637:
633:
624:
622:
617:
611:
607:
602:
598:
594:
592:
587:
583:
580:
577:
552:
524:
520:
502:
478:
474:
458:
455:
451:
448:
431:
412:
408:
404:
382:
379:
371:Please See:
360:
356:
348:
341:
324:
314:
308:
305:
289:
268:
260:
249:
245:
243:
234:
228:
225:
218:
196:
185:
167:
131:
121:
119:after a VfD
108:
82:LaszloWalrus
79:
67:
55:
43:
37:
629:new article
463:Great work.
433:User:Elonka
327:User:Ed g2s
325:I've asked
36:This is an
691:No. Thank
560:Lexic Dark
532:Lexic Dark
486:Lexic Dark
204:Lexic Dark
584:that much
517:Messenger
445:LOST Page
681:Leflyman
509:JBKramer
437:Opark 77
425:Opark 77
391:Leflyman
361:warnings
335:Opark 77
318:Opark 77
296:Leflyman
272:Opark 77
182:Barnstar
753:Loqi T.
741:Loqi T.
704:Loqi T.
642:Loqi T.
364:policy.
254:Paxomen
250:support
221:article
96:Buridan
39:archive
653:Thanks
618:Tigers
553:thanks
525:thanks
479:thanks
353:WP:AGF
246:object
197:thanks
505:WP:PP
503:From
420:Pagra
270:stay.
235:Buffy
219:Buffy
153:Travb
138:Travb
16:<
695:sir.
693:you,
667:Lost
329:and
174:PKtm
157:talk
142:talk
663:was
588:few
248:or
226:Hi
134:VfD
113:to
76:3RR
65:.)
603:do
418:.
387:--
375::
194:!
144:)
72:.
555:/
527:/
481:/
385:"
378:"
199:/
159:)
155:(
140:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.