User talk:Let us eat lettuce

840:

of view, but by no stretch of the imagination is it a neutral point of view. I strongly advise you to accept that posting content to advocate a point of view, as you have done, is contrary to Knowledge policy, whether you like that policy or not. (There are Knowledge policies that I personally don't agree with, but I accept that they are policies.) If you continue to refuse to accept Knowledge policies then it is likely that before long you will be blocked from editing by an administrator, so please do start accepting them. Also, there is no place in Knowledge for posting content on the basis that "it is speculated". Finally, I strongly advise you that if you keep on re-submitting the same draft without addressing the issue that led to its repeatedly being rejected before, then you will almost certainly be blocked from editing, to prevent you from wasting the time of volunteers who review it.

1311:. You have been told repeatedly of the need to edit neutrally and to avoid making personal comments. If you honestly can't see that statements such as "Trump Derangement Syndrome set in and manifest itself in the continued efforts to respond negatively to every Trump initiative, every Trump policy, and every Trump idea" express opinions, then you have such a lack of ability to understand the difference between objective and subjective reporting that you are probably not going to be able to start contributing in the neutral way required. If, on the other hand, you understand perfectly well that such statements express opinions, but put them in because you believe those opinions are right, then you are here to use Knowledge to promote a point of view. You really need to change your approach very quickly if you are not to be blocked: you have had plenty of warnings. 4112:

into a crowd of counter-protesters, killing one woman and injuring 19 others. According to Attorney General Sessions, that action met the definition of domestic terrorism. During the rally there was other violence, as several counter-protesters charged at the white nationalists with swinging clubs and mace, throwing bottles, rocks, and paint. Trump did not initially express mention of Neo-Nazis, white supremacists, or the alt-right movement in his remarks on August 13. However, the following day (August 14), he did denounce white supremacists while still failing to mention the counter-protestors. He further condemned "the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups". Then the next day (August 15), he again blamed "both sides".

3693:

Reliable Source, reporting that "Rush Limbaugh said such-and-such". I am going to have to remove the Limbaugh sentence. I understand your desire to include more commentary from the right, but it's got to have secondary sourcing. For that matter, it would be better if the commentary was actually supporting Trump's performance at the summit, rather than complaining about the negative coverage. Can you find anything where a commentator praises Trump's performance, AND a secondary source quotes them? --

4116:

were interpreted as muted and equivocal. The New York Times reported that Trump "was the only national political figure to spread blame for the 'hatred, bigotry and violence' that resulted in the death of one person to 'many sides'", and said that Trump had "buoyed the white nationalist movement on Tuesday as no president has done in generations". The news media later reported that the White nationalist groups felt "emboldened" after the rally and planned additional demonstrations.

1582: 1413: 1867: 1296: 939: 3842: 3787: 2167: 254: 580: 1836: 1754: 1110: 2839: 210: 877:. Both impeachment and the 25th Amendment are constitutional mechanisms, and their use is not a coup d'etat. In fact, these are mechanisms that were introduced, in 1789 and in 1967, to remove a President from office by lawful means rather than by coup d'etat. Are you implying that the impeachment efforts are extra-constitutional, or are you referring to an actual coup d'etat, perhaps by General 3274: 3110: 665: 487: 382: 103: 2254:. A wiki "is a website on which users collaboratively modify content and structure directly from the web browser. In a typical wiki, text is written using a simplified markup language and often edited with the help of a rich-text editor. A wiki is run using wiki software, otherwise known as a wiki engine." Knowledge articles are simply referred to as "articles". Just thought you should know. 2337: 3047: 2662: 2587: 2011: 1973: 4091:

is a Knowledge article so trying to paint a hatred picture and naming Trump as somehow advocating the hatred from only one named side of the hatred. Bigotry is rampant on Knowledge and your reversion surely exposes your bigotry. Maybe you'd like to blow whistles or a blow horn at anybody with a voice different than yours. I know about your type.

3432: 348:. We initially assume editors are both capable and willing to learn from mistakes. So sanctions start off small and for short periods. Persistent problems can lead to more severe and/or longer sanctions. And for the few who are unable or unwilling to change, admins might impose bans of various scopes, of which 3709:

about, linked to a general archive of every comment he has made on every subject. I'm not going to re-remove it (the article is not under 1RR but I will treat it as if it is). But I suspect someone else will, and they will be justified. We NEED proper secondary sources for what we put in the article. --

4008:

but instead to push a particular point of view, many times in defiance of the sources already in the article. I know you have been here over a year, but I'm not highly impressed by your previous editing either — certainly not enough to make up for recent edits. If you think there are good reasons why

3692:

Hi, Lettuce! Your addition of Limbaugh to the Summit article is still not properly sourced. You put in the article a vague comment about the kind of thing he was saying, and you listed a 1) primary source with 2) nothing specific to actually back up what you said. You would need a secondary source, a

2950:

Hi, Lettuce! I also came here to comment on something from the Peter Strzok article: Please do not add the false claim that Strzok signed the document opening the FBI's investigation of Russian interference in the U.S. elections "after the 2016 presidential election." I think you've done that twice

4090:

Thanks for the tip... was just adding content to report factual-ness. I read the prior account, it seems so slanted towards white-hatred... Is this what Knowledge is all about? what about the facts? why not document the counter-protesters and their hatred? bring balance to two paragraphs... why

1773:

for more information on uploading your material to Knowledge. For legal reasons, Knowledge cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use

839:

If you can really write stuff about "the liberal biased news media" and believe that "there is no violation of neutral point of view" then it is doubtful that you have sufficient ability to see the nature of your own editing to contribute to Knowledge. That may well be your own sincerely held point

4115:

Many Republican and Democratic elected officials condemned the violence and hatred of the counter-protestors and the Unite the Right activists. Trump came under criticism from world leaders and politicians, as well as a variety of religious groups and anti-hate organizations for his remarks, which

4111:

On August 13, 2017, Trump condemned violence "on many sides" after a gathering of thousands of white nationalists and others supporting retention of monuments depicting American history in Charlottesville, Virginia, the previous day (August 12) turned deadly. A Unite the Right activist drove a car

3947:

me, you need to actually link my username. Two links to my talkpage won't do it, so I only accidentally noticed you had addressed me here. I don't agree that you mainly added content to report factualness. More than additions, you made removals and changes, and they were tendentious. What do you

1929:. Please use the talk page to try and get consensus for your edits. I also note that you've been warned in regard to the discretionary sanctions in place on articles related to American politics. Usually, if a user continuously fails to abide by Knowledge policy on such articles, the next stop is 3708:

I see you re-added Rush. The problem with the Rush sentence is not that he is not notable; of course he is. The problem with that comment is that it does not have a proper secondary source. And the way you re-added it, it still doesn't. It's still your own summary of the kind of thing he talked

2851:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2622: 2228:. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 314:. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 760:

Hi, I was looking at the sandbox and saw your work on the attempted impeachment of the current US president ad was wondering how it is a coup d'état. I also worried that your article does not meet Knowledge's guidelines when it comes to articles having a

2704:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Knowledge is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. -- 2639:

Rapid fire editing, clogs up the recent changes log and page history logs, and exposes you and other users to edit conflicts. Even if you haven't made a mistake, it's a courtesy to the community to limit serial edit commits over a short period of time.

3858:

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

352:

might be the most common. So, in answer to your question, I think you can choose to read all the guideline and policy related material that has been shared with you and try to edit accordingly, or you can choose not to and see what happens.

1052:

especially the part about behavioral standards. You're on notice about DS, and so the relatively speedy sanctions procedures at AE are in play. See the DS alert I gave you a few days ago in an earlier thread, and click-and-read the links

3896:

You have been editing both biographies and American politics topics in a way that people have been questioning on this page, and I see you have just made a lot of small but sometimes opinionated changes to the highly controversial article

3887: 2195: 2406:

Furthermore, you have been advised of potential sanctions relating to the politics of the United States - beyond the disruption posed by poorly-sourced edits, you may be subject to editing restrictions if this continues.

2193:

to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is

1593:

from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Knowledge, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

1424:

903:

As to rioting, I do not think that the rioting was intended to remove Mr. Trump from office, but to protest (illegally). Not every illegal or violent protest is treasonous. They may be only illegal and violent.

2989: 2879: 2728:

Warring? I edited my contribution to indicate solely Franken's latest response. Maybe others are warring, but I am contributing factual info... This 'liberal' is just as much due his day, as anybody else

2556: 2479: 221: 3966:

Ping again... good to hear from a collaborator... I am trying to correrct the representasion of the story with items that fefunct Trump Derangemment Syndrom. seems light existing wiki article is very

2448:

The sooner you understand that Knowledge is not a forum for fringe material the easier you wiki-life will be. Several editors have told you this. If you persist in ignoring them you will face sanctions.

1717:

Also note that Knowledge articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Knowledge project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in

1548:

2434:, I thought I was adding valid content, that was omitted from the wiki. The edits were not meant to be disruption. The main stream media sources wikipedia approves of just don't report the content. 947: 280:

to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is

2863:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 793:

Have added additional info to support the coup d'état narrative. I have attempted to evolve this beyond the essay status into wiki format. meeting resistance... all factual w/ citations.....

3453: 3661: 3803:

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

3831: 2190: 281: 277: 1219:

the opening statement says "attempts to capture". I suggest that the NYT article confirms the film actually does capture the scene and my new edits were meant to show this. peace

1049: 3143: 2080:- I do not know what you are doing at the Alt-left AfD but if you continue to disrupt it I will need to report you to the appropriate forum. You are bordering dangerously on 3050: 1976: 232:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

3001: 1814:

I hope appearance does not equal proof of violation... The content was faithfully edited. btw, Is the article really under review for inclusion? or just elimination?

1001:

I think you made a comment before logging in, and the server was showing me your IP address. I think I fixed that correctly but would you look at this please? Can you

3978:

what you mean by "white-haterd". There's no need to write a lot of other stuff, if you have trouble with the writing. Just explain the one word I asked about, please.

2372: 615: 3156: 3307:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

3189:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

702:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

520:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

419:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

147:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

2700:

from editing Knowledge. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the

2022:. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 26: 3077:

about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting

25: 4070:; you don't get to edit at all, except this, your own, user talkpage. Note the instructions above, in case you want to appeal the block to another admin. 946:. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Knowledge without adequate explanation, as you did at 2138:

In other words, restrict your comments at AfDs and indeed article talk pages to discussing the article, not your feelings about anything or other editors.

2997: 918:

Language such as "biased media" and "political feeding frenzy" should not be in the voice of Knowledge. If someone has used these phrases, quote them.

3664:

has been reverted as a BLP violation, and a pretty serious one at that. It's unsourced and non-factual, a partisan attack on Comey. Don't do that. --

3546: 3015: 1766: 1758: 1590: 1586: 1421: 3054: 2591: 1980: 1770: 1672: 1503: 2685:, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a 1671:

be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See

1502:

be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See

2491: 43:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge and get help from experienced editors like 1782:, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators 3294: 3066: 2951:

now but it is incorrect. The investigation was not opened after the election. It was opened in summer 2016, and that's what the source says. --

2814: 3890:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 3834:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 3542: 3321:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

3203:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

3011: 2913:

can be used as a reliable source are very few. What's even worse, you wrote that living persons lied the FBI. Lying means telling an untruth

1726:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be

1557:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be

2893: 3926:

Thanks for the tip... Just adding content to report factual-ness. I read the prior account seemed so slanted towards white-haterd ...

4026: 3162: 2209: 1126: 295: 3166: 2560: 2507: 2487: 1719: 1550: 770: 2935:

understood... Will wait till the 'reliable sources' report on this. btw, I heard and saw this reported on Fox and the EIB network.

3070: 2371:

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Knowledge's

614:

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Knowledge's

774: 3755: 2761:. You need to be more specific though, do you mean delete entire articles so that they are not there, or simply to delete text? 3467: 3419: 3290: 3280: 3261: 3116: 3097: 3074: 2889: 2200:

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means

2186: 2056: 2019: 1988: 1875: 1848: 1304: 1122: 762: 671: 652: 493: 474: 388: 369: 286:

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means

273: 109: 90: 3631: 3058: 2217: 1984: 1840: 1646: 1615: 1477: 1446: 1114: 303: 1395: 799: 766: 3463: 3358: 3298: 3240: 1730:

from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —

1332:

Sorry, understand. The article clearly does state the content added to wiki. you may have missed this in the article....

736: 554: 453: 340:. My answer to your question whether you "should cease and desist" is that any sanctions our admins impose are meant to 181: 3286: 2872: 2365: 2361: 2341: 1871: 1634: 1561:

from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

1465: 1300: 1140:

Was going to warn you myself, but the IP beat me to it. Don't do it again, and please source all article additions with

978: 943: 693: 608: 604: 584: 515: 410: 131: 4010: 2884: 2651: 1118: 1083: 1045: 2018:. Knowledge is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a 1181:

You mean the video description? Because that is not a reliable source and thus cannot be used to back up your edits.

873:. It is a misuse of language, and a serious misuse of language, to refer to impeachment attempts as an attempt at a 710: 656: 588: 528: 478: 427: 373: 229: 213: 202: 155: 94: 1710:

confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see

1541:

confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see

336:

you posted at my talk page, but since the thread is already started here, I'll reply here. This is in accord with

4001: 3898: 3868: 3812: 3743: 2213: 2093: 2031: 2023: 2000: 1611: 1442: 1333: 1285: 1058: 1010: 358: 322: 299: 216:, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for 3589: 2697: 2380: 2356:

with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek

2225: 1938: 1883: 1785: 1727: 1558: 1308: 1220: 951: 923: 909: 894: 641: 623: 599:

with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek

463: 391:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

345: 311: 3751: 3532: 1272:, I keep reverting with explanations in the edit summaries, and you should try to start a talk page thread (see 3619: 3078: 2682: 2677:. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Knowledge this is known as " 2353: 2221: 2201: 1992: 596: 496:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

307: 287: 237: 73: 4000:

On second thoughts, never mind about the white-haterd, I can guess. I've taken a closer look at your edits to

3627: 4092: 4052: 3927: 3383: 2936: 2782: 2744: 2730: 2564: 2435: 2113: 2060: 1991:

about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting

1952: 1904: 1815: 1687: 1642: 1518: 1473: 1357: 1336: 1237: 1223: 1206: 1168: 1130: 1087: 1069: 1025: 982: 805: 780: 564: 220:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 3669: 2709: 2701: 2678: 2666: 2644: 2555:

The further you distance yourself from the subject matter ,the more clarity, however, I shall refrain....

2205: 1322: 1265: 1260:

Failure to engage in consensus decision making is one of the explicitly listed signs of disruptive editing

851: 674:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

291: 3283:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was:

3119:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was:

112:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

3322: 3315: 3265: 3204: 3197: 3101: 3086: 2860: 2823: 2767: 2607: 2345: 2321: 2305: 2291: 2260: 2237: 2144: 2109: 2089: 2059:

violated when using actual sources describing the wiki subject matter? Have you checked the citation?

2044: 2027: 2015: 1996: 1281: 1054: 1006: 354: 318: 3974:"Fefunct"?? I don't know what that means. Are you typing on a phone with mittens on your hands? Please 1791:

This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing.

1385:

Justin Raimondo | Los Angeles Times, Do you suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome?, December 27, 2016

3536: 3515:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

3449: 3005: 2988:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2922: 2519: 2483: 2458: 2416: 2392: 2173:

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does

1948: 1934: 1762: 1711: 1657: 1653: 1566: 1542: 1488: 1484: 1189: 1152: 959: 919: 905: 890: 637: 459: 260:

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does

3136: 2974: 2910: 2686: 2633:

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the

2357: 1891: 1856: 1699: 1530: 600: 349: 233: 2618:

button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

4087: 4075: 4034: 3983: 3953: 3923: 3919: 3906: 3728: 3714: 3698: 3585: 3121:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Knowledge requires

2956: 2817:

where you copied material without attribution. You are heading for a block if you do this again.

2758: 2603: 2085: 1879: 1844: 746: 677: 560: 499: 394: 115: 57: 50: 40: 3528: 3183:

sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Knowledge at this time.

4005: 3770: 3665: 3646: 3623: 3604: 3562: 3501: 3405: 3368: 3250: 3031: 2847: 2722: 2705: 2626: 2611: 2599: 2204:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the

1801: 1738: 1318: 847: 632: 290:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the

191: 4016: 3883: 3848:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

3827: 3793:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

3329: 3211: 3082: 2856: 2818: 2776: 2762: 2595: 2317: 2286: 2278: 2255: 2232: 2139: 1269: 1044:

OK... you're taking swings at others( e.g., equating reverts with censorship). Please read

1021: 823: 700:

This is an incoherent rant, clearly not a genuine attempt to create an encyclopedic article.

3948:

mean by "white-haterd"? Please explain very clearly, because I don't like the sound of it.

2871:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4067: 3879: 3872: 3864: 3860: 3823: 3816: 3808: 3804: 3438: 3423: 3297:. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid 3062: 2966: 2932: 2918: 2909:

Don't ever use Daily Mail for sourcing material regarding living persons. The cases where

2690: 2621: 2545: 2513: 2473: 2452: 2429: 2410: 2386: 1630: 1562: 1461: 1182: 1145: 974: 955: 337: 139: 2263: 1641:.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to 1472:.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to 1396:

http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-persistence-of-trump-derangement-syndrome

3539:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 3008:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 2602:

button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces

1925:

Your edits on Al Gore, both the article and the talk page violate Knowledge policies on

1589:

have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of

1420:

have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of

3944: 3901:. That is the reason I'm giving you the above reminders about discretionary sanctions. 3581: 3524: 2970: 2868: 2670: 1887: 1852: 1603: 1585:

Hello Let us eat lettuce, and welcome to Knowledge. All or some of your addition(s) to

1434: 1416:

Hello Let us eat lettuce, and welcome to Knowledge. All or some of your addition(s) to

970: 878: 689: 681: 511: 503: 406: 398: 127: 119: 3841: 3786: 2166: 1866: 1602:

amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double

1433:

amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double

1295: 938: 253: 4084: 4071: 4048: 4030: 3979: 3963: 3949: 3902: 3724: 3710: 3694: 3553:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3152: 3148: 3022:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2952: 2864: 2274: 2081: 1926: 1683: 1638: 1514: 1469: 1417: 1273: 1068:

taking swings at others? just replied to explain the edits. no malice intended...

886: 742: 225: 217: 143: 209: 4100: 4078: 4060: 4037: 3986: 3956: 3935: 3909: 3774: 3766: 3762: 3718: 3702: 3682: 3650: 3642: 3638: 3608: 3600: 3596: 3566: 3558: 3554: 3505: 3497: 3409: 3401: 3391: 3379: 3372: 3364: 3254: 3246: 3130: 3090: 3035: 3027: 3023: 2978: 2960: 2944: 2926: 2897: 2826: 2790: 2770: 2752: 2738: 2713: 2655: 2634: 2572: 2526: 2495: 2466: 2443: 2424: 2400: 2325: 2294: 2282: 2240: 2147: 2121: 2097: 2068: 2035: 2004: 1960: 1942: 1930: 1912: 1895: 1860: 1823: 1811: 1805: 1794: 1742: 1731: 1607: 1570: 1438: 1365: 1344: 1326: 1289: 1245: 1231: 1214: 1202: 1196: 1176: 1159: 1141: 1134: 1095: 1077: 1062: 1033: 1014: 990: 963: 927: 913: 898: 882: 874: 866: 855: 828: 788: 750: 685: 645: 628: 568: 507: 467: 402: 362: 326: 241: 195: 187: 123: 3305:

The tone of the article can be tightened up more to make it an encyclopedic entry.

2838: 1835: 1109: 3486: 3466:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to 3577: 3176: 3172: 2625:

The "show preview" button is right next to the "save page" button and below the

1753: 1667:

own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you

1498:

own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you

870: 816: 3273: 3109: 2781:!! I was referring to adding to evolving content about any given wiki article. 2696:

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be

664: 486: 381: 102: 3516: 3065:

are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on

2993: 2674: 2048: 1626: 1457: 1221:

http://www.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9F0DEFDD1E31E034BC4D51DFBF668383679EDE

1165: 1005:? If not, I'll put it back to show the IP address instead of your user name. 1878:

by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at

1394:

Adam Gopnik | The New Yorker, The Persistence of Trump Derangement Syndrome,

3459: 1706:

be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you

1537:

be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you

1951:

just trying to add valid content. I do seek consensus / collaboration...

1307:

by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be

680:

than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in

502:

than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in

397:

than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in

118:

than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in

3747: 2810: 2052: 3159:

when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing

3046: 2875:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2661: 2586: 2010: 1972: 1769:

from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read

1637:. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, 1468:. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, 779:

So, I hope to develop this... I have added more, so help out if u can

3458:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

1851:

and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.

1125:

and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.

3520: 3431: 2990:

Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections

2482:

I've concluded that in his own mind he genuinely means well but the

3485:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

3081:

and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.

1995:

and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.

1987:, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, 3057:. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a 2620: 2251: 1983:. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a 1839:

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own

3441:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1353:

considering the content of the 2 cited articles, I thought I did

222:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/User:Let us eat lettuce/sandbox

4004:, and they are completely tendentious. You have been blocked as 3854:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

3799:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

3742:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

3618:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

3576:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2965:

Also you shouldn't have marked those edits as being minor - see

1050:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American_politics#Principles

889:

would participate in a violation of constitutional principles.

3314:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

3196:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

2878:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

709:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

527:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

426:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

154:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

45: 2281:

carefully. That might help you with your other problems. Also

2177:

imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

264:

imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

68: 2743:

btw, who has the right to police wiki articles and delete???

948:

Donald Trump's disclosure of classified information to Russia

228:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

3430: 3272: 3108: 1702:

before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources

1533:

before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources

663: 485: 380: 101: 2969:. This is a minor point (heh) but you should keep it mind. 1621:

Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information

1452:

Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information

3179:

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional

1694:

be possible to include greater portions of a source text.

1525:

be possible to include greater portions of a source text.

3474:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

3325:, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add " 3207:, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add " 3662:

Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections

3359:

Knowledge's real-time chat help from experienced editors

3338: