User talk:Lomcevak - Knowledge (XXG)

800:

the discusions), we can then assess the pages and assign an importance (To Derbyshire project) rating. The project is trying to systematically find all Derbyshire related articles, and ultimately improve them. We have done the Constituency ones. Any Help would be appreciated in collecting up these missing articles. The project tagging also helps in knowing about articles that can be wiki linked to from others. Any queriers leave a message on my talk page or the Derbyshire project one. Thanks, hope you can assist -

2386:. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like 893:: I wouldent bother adding {{tl:talk}} to a page unless the page has non-constructive discussions, or editors not signing comments and following guide lines etc. TOC's genearly create themselves when theres 3 section headings (i often force creation on article pages were the main text is one big block above the see also,refs & ex links sections, by placing a heading after the lead paragraph 2178:

has submitted evidence to it. The fact that someone was quoted in the local press commenting about Engel's public meetings does not mean it is relevant to give a potted biography of them together with external links to their home page; this person is only a member of the public. The section also had excessive headings and subheadings. I made sure to preserve all useful and useable information.

273: 694: 614: 1214: 489: 704:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Knowledge (XXG) can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate 624:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Knowledge (XXG) can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate 1556: 1334: 107: 2394:, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- 2280:

Sorry. Nothing to do with me. I'm using a public resource - IPs all over the place - terminals are left open all the time in our libraries, here, not good, and I have said and so ... I advocated a 'Red Ticket' design as you may say - they are a bit inconvenient since they often conceal the scroll bar

1691:

Bad idea or not I'm not having comments on my talk page which have the sole intention of provoking an angry response from me. Lomcevak's responses were neither constructive nor appropriate and dealing with such a rude and belligerent user only serves to be counterproductive to what Knowledge (XXG) is

1594:

Pretzels, who are you referring to there? Lomcevak vandalised my talk page and was attempting to get an angry response from me, so I deleted it. Then he added another comment, which I deleted again. I will not have anyone doing that on my talk page to provoke me. If he wishes to apologise, then so be

234:

Lomcevak has edited from only one IP, and it's *riddled* with Tilejoin socks (I caught a half-dozen more while I was looking into this unblock request). Moreover, there is no way to distinguish this user from Tilejoin based on the technical evidence - he looks, in every technical way, like a Tilejoin

1026:

P.S. Oh, yes, I meant to add that if your non-anonymous contributions got caught-up in reverting the anonymous ones, then my apologies ... please try again from the (non-anonymous) base ... with the provisos above in mind. Give reasoning for the changes you want to make - with evidence and examples.

897:

gives more details on layout, but i just follow general format for basic articles. (same on talks with old discussions prior to project banner tagging, just add a heading to tidy up). Infoboxes should generally have all the parameters as its hard to update them if missing all missing as you have to

582:

Regarding coming from an anonymous IP at the University of Central Lancashire, it's a pretty big place. There's in the order of 25,000+ students and 3,000+ members of staff, and Knowledge (XXG) edits are very common from them, myself included (I was the anonymous you are referring to, I didn't think

1529:

My dealing with her is about ACCOUNTABILITY which we don't get through this abysmal government. That's my democratic right !! To hold the government to account through my supposed democratic representative (excuse me while I fall off my chair laughing) ... while the rest of the slaves to New Labour

1271:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that

799:

It would be great help to the project if you could add other Derbyshire MPs (current and past) as well as to the category or sub cat. And add the project banner {{WikiProject Derbyshire|class=|importance=|ibox=|photo=}} by copy & pasting on to the talk page below existing banners (but above the

586:

It is against Knowledge (XXG) rules to link to any commercial institution when citing a source if it does not contain information about the person in question. By all means mention her husband owns a business but AFAIK it is not within the rules of name the business or link to it unless it directly

2177:

being given to the expenses section, with some information not accurately sourced and much completely irrelevant to a biography of one individual MP. It is not, for instance, appropriate to include a summary of the Legg inquiry here, nor to say much about the Kelly inquiry save that Natascha Engel

848:

MP, according to 2nd paragraph of his bio. Till I find out how other areas are Categorising them (to standardise Cats) I just added him to the general Politics in Derbyshire cat but really needs a Former MP category and a MPs of Derbyshire (for current ones) as sub categories of Politics Category.

366:

has done this blocking action once before. (See above) As I've said before, I'm working from a public facility which means it's possible that some other user on these facilities has become associated with the IP as the 'sockpuppet' of 'Tilejoin.' I'm sorry about that, but there's nothing I can do.

2351:

Hi there Lomcevak. You are registered with WikiProject Derbyshire and we are cleaning out our list of members. As you have not contributed to any page for over a year we have removed you as inactive. If you still want to participate in the project, just go back and add yourself again. Thank you.

2127:

I believe we met outside the so called "meeting" on the 12th of June, (you mentioned that you have undertaken some work here). This is my best effort to track you down, if not sorry for bothering you. (Give me an email I should come up from an internet search of my name, if not we can talk in

817:

Thanks, Just adding a few items each session to missing categories, and wiki-linking them in other articles (were relevant) all helps to spread the web of wiki links out from . I started when looking at articles think why isent that part of this project or that and am now systematically adding

2051:

Lomcevak, are you in love with Natascha Engel, Sam Ellis and myself? You seem to devote an awful lot of your time rambling on about them and myself, and the death of New Mandelsonianithicanispianonian Labour of New Old Republicanmandelsonianblairismism or whatever you call it. Seriously, it's

791:

Welcome to the project, I see your interested in politics (Natasha Engle mainly) and note you added her page to the category Politics of Derbyshire. I've not seen (there may be one) a category for all the Derbyshire MPs (and past ones) which should be a sub category to the

1646:

I'm referring to you, Fetler - it's generally a bad idea to edit or remove other's talk page comments. You are free to do what you please on your own talk page, however deleting accusations instead of replying gives the impression to others you have something to hide. See

1610:

898:

generally go and get the lot as trying to remember the correct parameters for seldom used ones is a pain) as if missing when more info available its unlikely to get added (a few odd parameters that will never be used can be deleted but most should stay IMO ) Thanks -

981:

Which commercial institutions referred to, do you have a problem with (?) ... perhaps it's Vale Vet's that refers to David (Newton) Salisbury-Jones' wife as the (MP) Natascha ... as Engel refers to her husband in her (official) website as Dave 'the (mere) vet ?'

593:

Please don't disregard someone's edit because you don't agree with it. All I'm doing it attempting to get the page to adhere to the rules. You do not personally own the page, and anyone is open to edit it as they see fit. Please bear that in mind in the future.

977:

Such edits reduce enclopaedic information, such as the full name of Engel's husband from David (Newton) Salisbury-Jones to 'David' (in the text of the entry). Is that supposed to convey some idea of 'intimacy' between Knowledge (XXG) and Engel/Salisbury-Jones.

1131:

548:

page? I merely corrected iffy information. The page you revert to contains citations which are against Knowledge (XXG) rules (they advertise commercial institutions and do not link to anything which contain's Natascha's name or achievements).

2281:

advising people to close off their allotted time. I have gone through this exercise before - sockpuppetry as you name it (see earlier in this History). And there are reasons that I really don't much care about any of this, right now ... best

2092:

No, I don't love you, Levret, Ellis or Engel. You have come to be examples of a (political) way of being that I find 'empty' and that has resulted in much that is destructive in our society. That is my opinion, it belongs to me and that is

1299:

Your 'promotion' of Sam Ellis is noted ... I've brought your Wiki entry of 'Sam Ellis' up to boilerplate/stub standard and created a discussion page where, first, the 'intimate' relations ('thinking-wise' that is) between you (Fetler), one

1273: 375:) to 'sort wheat from chaff ?' Thanks for early cooperation with unblocking. I have items I wish to contribute. (Oh, yes, see my contributions list (again): see it's fairly selectively channelled and all legit.) PS. I have logged-in and no 2390:. For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like 1878:

for details, and to add your comments if desired. NOTE: You are not bound or required to participate in this discussion, however your input would be helpful to resolve any dispute that may have contributed to this alert being posted.

1695:

I have no problem with Lomcevak striving for accountability in British politics, but harassing other users is just downright nasty and unnecessary when they either edit articles he has edited or if they take offence to his actions.

849:

But there's a general attempt to not create to many categories randomly but in a structured format, so when the main category starts to fill up we can just move them to a suitable sub cat. (it makes searching easier for users) -

194:

Yes, quite possibly the same IP. I work from my local library, right now, being 'between' personal kit and, of course, the facilities are public. Best I can say is look at the (few) contributions I (Lomcevak) have made. Again,

2221:. Students have been procrastinating and cutting corners since school was invented; that's nothing new. I prefer to focus on those who do want to learn, and as for the rest - well, their grades will reflect their attitude. -- 2326: 2322: 1798:

As it was, I kept silence. That is until you started redacting the trail of evidence as to why we had reached such an impasse noting this is all about ACCOUNTABILTY ... and not just in British politics.

1525:

in this set, to a pestilence upon the land that we need (as the UK people) to put out of our misery. I've expressed just as much to Engel on-line and off (far more virulently - you can trust me on this).

1886:

A Wikiquette discussion is not an indictment, an insult, or a slight. Wikiquette discussions are an early step in dispute resolution, and involved users should bear that in mind during participation, so…

590:

The same goes for linking to the KCL departments. If the departmental pages actually contain information about Natascha then that is permissible, but as they do not then it is not permissible.

1791:

that is 'economical with the actualite' when you assert that I was only protesting about 'minor edits'. I think my use of the words 'whole sale surgery' in my earlier replies to you gives the

1415:. Such being, I have recovered the sections that you wish to be suppressed (I note that you have done this before , from studying your past editing history) and have taken them over to my 1232:) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 2052:

disturbing. Then again, I love watching it... it's like a highly comical nervous breakdown in slow motion. Where would we be without your rambles, rants, tirades and general buffoonery?

2391: 402:

You haven't been blocked directly, rather you are caught in an autoblock, or IP block. Can you follow the instructions on the block page and post a specific IP unblock request —

1052:. I have to hypothesise because you don't make it clear and so prevent people from responding, specifically, to whatever you're objecting about. However, if you examine the site 2379: 367:

However I don't see why that should prevent me (Lomcevak) from making my legitimate contributions. Maybe this is pointing towards the need for a more sophisticated way for a

178:

and is very likely to have evidence that you and Tile join edited from the same or similar IPs. I have asked him to come and check over it but I will not unblock you myself.

1074:. I came on to this with Kings links already established and I think all I did was harmonise what I found to be 'in main text' external links (xlinks) to footnotes (see the 1937:

found, by simple Googling, additional evidence of the Ellis/Newman 'mutual appreciation society' and will place that evidence on the discussion page of the Ellis article.

730:- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. 650:- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. 727: 647: 2073:

is a 'big word,' I know, but instead of ridiculing people who want to formulate and exchange ideas in language somewhat more expressive than New Labour verb free

1457:

could ever have done ... that's why New Labour and everything to do with it is so despised ... you are intelligent, I take it, enough to read the blogs ... like

1889:

Please remain civil. If you have a dissenting view, please present it calmly, and cite any references to talk page or article content with the applicable diffs.

1103:

Along the way you managed to introduce a completely unsourced reference, for example, to her policy on the 'smacking of children.' Now if you look, once again

925: 2401: 434:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

235:

sock. The IP evidence does suggest that it's a public computer though. I will hesitantly unblock, on the assumption that he is being honest in what he says.

967:

I have reverted edits that have appear to, principally, have come from a pair of anonymous IP's, one, specifically at the University of Central Lancashire.

1831:

To those who persist in vandalising my talk page - I will delete whatever you write. You will keep on adding your drivel, and I will keep on deleting it.

1717:

When you were told to leave requests on my talk page (they are still there BTW) on why I kept reverting your changes to Engel's entry I replied to you in

1975:

need watching ... especially in the run-up to the next General Election (May 2010) when the New Labor 'spin-troops' will be deployed at their 'fullest.'

1092:(to one of her constituents), information about her residential arrangements, among other things, which I pointed out to you had been the result of much 70: 2325:. All participants of the project have been subscribed to receive copies of the newsletter. You can unsubscribe simply by removing your name from the 254:|I (Lomcevak) am not a "sock-puppet" of "Tile join" but a legitimate and constructive Wikipedian. Raul654, you've done this once before. See above.}} 30:

to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

2387: 1118:

Whole sale surgery is not a very good idea. If you want to change things, especially to an established article, do it bit-by-bit and along the way

1007:

your contributions to other's talk pages ... I think that is the usual Knowledge (XXG) convention ... like I have done on your talk page, to this.

1345:. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. 1802:

In the meantime, you may note, I've improved your original stub of Sam Ellis and also noted the 'orphan' tag and ilinked between UKYP and Ellis.

1501:

But no, that's not Mandelsonian postmodernism (we make up the truth) style, is it ? And that's now why we are in such a mess in this country !!!

2208: 1762:

and, it seems to me, right now, closed ... but with many question marks around it. Pretzels asked me if I could add anything more and I said, '

1494:

in place for others to study at their leisure. Not like 'self-censoring cowards' that prefer to forget what has gone before: that is down the

753: 673: 419: 313: 2135: 2383: 1648: 1612: 1560: 742: 662: 1544: 1533:

Again, as I said before, have a good life ... (and I'm restraining myself for what I could say, for the sake of Wiki standards).

215: 54: 1512: 793: 2295:

No problem if you can't deal with this right now. Just to be clear though, you're not the same person who created the account

39: 27: 2199:

Would you put your statement in its own section? They're new, and I don't want to confuse them as to what a GA review is. -

308: 142: 1654: 1618: 73:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

1943: 737: 657: 552:

I'm only trying to help make the page better, not worse. Please desist reverting other people's edits back to your own.

567: 1784:

who is the first to reach for abuse as a way of replying to perfectly reasonable probes, under the available evidence!

708:, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like 628:, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like 286: 59: 2395: 2254: 2193: 1088:

appeared to engage in whole sale surgery, in the process of which you removed completely encyclopaedic, and possibly

996:(you may see that this page has been full of controversy, if you take the time to read) page of the article. See the 928:

and you may have further evidence to add to the page, judging from your previous interactions with the user. Thanks,

280: 2204: 285:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1653:

If you feel you are being attacked or victimised by another user, I strongly suggest explaining the situation at

1617:

If you feel you are being attacked or victimised by another user, I strongly suggest explaining the situation at

1107:, in the Publications section, you'll see I've added, on a stooge through the daily Google, a publicly available 1759: 1382: 1277: 34: 1736:

my findings for the Wiki community as 'circumstantial' but appeared to be worthy of continued scrutiny. I made

1692:

about. Such users cannot be reasoned with and therefore must only be ignored by the Knowledge (XXG) community.

1747:

have engaged in such scrutiny and have discerned the appearance of sockpuppetry or near sockpuppetry, i.e. a '

1517:

P.S. Taking a 'shine' to you doesn't even come on to the scale. Personally, I get the impression that I would

66: 1263: 818:

articles to a string of projects. I'll look the articles over when go through the assessment lists. - Thanks

2360: 2183: 2139: 1453:

to Parliament during Tory times ... the difference being that New Labour has done far much more damage than

2131: 2086: 1237: 887:

Good effort splitting them into sub cats as well, ever bit helps tidy things up and make navigation easier.

555: 2250: 1903: 903: 854: 823: 805: 327: 1568: 368: 175: 74: 2334: 2200: 2121: 2063: 2037: 2031: 1953: 1442: 1305: 1257: 1221: 1207: 874: 621: 607: 49: 1989: 2296: 2258: 1572: 701: 687: 2354: 2179: 136: 2345: 2174: 1242:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

461:

has a technical misunderstanding. Again, as I said above, I'm working from public resources so

98:

a "sock-puppet" of "Tile join" but a legitimate and constructive (I hope) Wikipedian. Thanks.}}

2228: 2000: 1913: 1899: 1454: 899: 850: 819: 801: 514: 478: 406: 384: 240: 81:

on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

2218: 1375: 1228:, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, 2330: 2304: 2270: 2059: 1838: 1703: 1600: 1564: 992:

you make (possibly controversial) changes you add (at least cotemporarily, at least) to the

955: 870: 712: 632: 563: 428: 251: 183: 91: 2262: 2245:

Hello Lomcevak. I've blocked you indefinitely for the time being for disruptive editing to

1875: 1871: 1338: 1233: 1225: 894: 705: 625: 1247: 388: 212: 1111:

to her purported policy. If you want to add Hansard, then fill your boots. But at least

211:

Ok, Raul should be able to verify that and will probably unblock you when he responds.

1438: 1342: 961: 757: 749: 677: 669: 545: 1752: 1224:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

362:

a "sock-puppet" of "Tile join" but a legitimate and constructive (I hope) Wikipedian.

2282: 2246: 2152: 2113: 2070: 2023: 1981: 1852: 1811: 1673: 1659: 1623: 1576: 1536: 1504: 1367: 1346: 1314: 1281: 1261:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 1192: 1155: 1030: 1013: 947: 929: 773: 721: 641: 526: 291: 258: 198: 156: 132: 44: 2224: 2082: 2074: 1895:

Please read the introduction at the top of the WQA page for additional information.

1763: 511: 474: 446: 442: 403: 376: 372: 363: 236: 171: 1874:

has been initiated, naming you as an involved party. Please see the discussion at

1000:

on modifications made to the main entry on residential information, for example.

869:

hmm BD = Bulldozer = El Dozer. Derby MPs are getting to look very much improved.

2300: 2266: 2055: 1965: 1957: 1834: 1699: 1596: 1495: 1361: 1301: 921: 845: 841: 559: 179: 2149:

If you're the person I think you are then you should find that I've emailed you

1930:

Thought you might find this interesting, especially after recent transactions.

1213: 2261:

by creating a new sock puppet account. I have posted this block for review at

1446: 1433:

The re-establishments are important, in document history, for disclosing that

756:. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- 676:. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- 1748: 1393: 971: 693: 613: 1138:

A very good 'exhortation' which I will always be sure to 'bear in mind' as

2173:

Please don't just blindly revert. The article was in a terrible mess with

2077:('Action - Modernization - Forward - Together'), why not try to engage in 1458: 1145:

And good ways to avoid future confusion is not to use anonymous IPLs and,

126:

Raul unblocked him an hour ago. Procedurally closing the unblock request

2014:

Nothing is quite as simple as it seems, is it ? Least of all on Wiki ...

1185:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Natascha_Engel#Notice_of_a_Breakout_on_Youth

985:

Please list your disagreements and then we can discuss the ins and outs.

2036:

P.S. I'm now also aware of this previous 'contribution' from you to the

1892:

It is perfectly acceptable to disagree, as long as it is done agreeably.

1808:

And will you have the guts not to redact this from your talk page ... ?

1555: 1333: 1070:

If you wish to remove KCL specific information, then feel free ... just

488: 1733: 1405: 1184: 1097: 1061: 997: 993: 469:

IP. The public council facilities that I work from/ can work from have

2407: 2368: 2338: 2308: 2290: 2274: 2235: 2212: 2187: 2160: 2143: 1907: 1860: 1842: 1744: 1726: 1722: 1707: 1681: 1667: 1631: 1604: 1595:

it. If not, then I will continue to delete his comments as I see fit.

1584: 1380: 1354: 1322: 1289: 1200: 1163: 1049: 1038: 1021: 937: 907: 878: 858: 827: 809: 781: 760: 680: 571: 534: 517: 409: 266: 244: 222: 206: 187: 164: 147: 2097:

prerogative. You clearly have problems with my way of being. That is

1961: 1048:

I think the 'commecial institution' that you must be referring to is

483: 101: 916:

Fetler/Levret/Lancashire University/Samuel Ellis and Natascha Engel

1882:

Some important things to remember during a Wikiquette discussion;

1821: 1924:

Edit Centric gets 'pissed-off' because other admins says he has

1176: 1108: 453:

the anon-range should be overcome. Read above ! Clearly this is

2017:... 'n yes I know you're going to redact this 'drivel' too ... 1149:, sign you 'contributions' to the talk pages of other editors. 770:

I have complied with the (bot) requests for copyright release.

733:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

653:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

1751:' approach to Wikipediatry. Interested parties should examine 1462: 1173:

You see, we try to be clean and honest here at Wiki ... see:

1445:) who bears a nodding acquaintance with the 'actualite' (as 1267:

explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for

1238:

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

1212: 692: 612: 271: 2321:

The first UK Politics newsletter is currently available at

477:

and 'sock blocking' of users have some very recent history

358:

Second request on this unblock. As before, I (Lomcevak) am

1822:

Fetler's reaction: Mandelsonian postmodernist to the death

1805:

Now ... who is it again who cannot be reasoned with ... ?

1404:

information that has been supplied and linked in to other

2392:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon

1521:

you. You are, New Labour, these days akin, and I include

1381:

You just don't get it do you (ACCOUNTABILITY that is): ?

587:

contains information about Natascha. That's advertising.

445:... sigh ... I understand I'm caught in an autoblock and 416:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

2323:

WP:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom/Newsletter

1740:

personal allegations against you and I left it at that.

436:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2380:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge

2104:

However it is just as much my world as it is yours ...

1085: 1078: 341: 337: 331: 322: 318: 304: 300: 296: 1777:

who bandies around with words like 'infant' etc. etc.

1177:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Natascha_Engel#Work_with_Youth

2011:

Just FYI (in case you hadn't studied background) ...

1876:

WP:WQA#User:Lomcevak, User:Fetler, and Natascha Engel

1392:

contributions to your talk page can hardly be called

1766:... but ...' I really wasn't remotely interested in 1426:

Thereby, the argument links are re-established, for

279:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

1236:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please 473:of IPs ! I'm very wary of all this because clearly 1571:. If you would like to experiment, please use the 1773:However, now in your response to the case, it is 920:Hello Lomcevak. I'm writing to let you know that 2217:Sorry, but I've reverted your comment there per 2253:, unhelpful, disruptive and biting comments at 1999: 1437:are yet another 'New Labour' clone (along with 752:. For assistance on the image use policy, see 672:. For assistance on the image use policy, see 505:I've made you exempt from the IP block for now 2382:has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland 1567:. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be 1272:if the page does get deleted, you can contact 1226:section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion 726:(to require that you be credited), or any tag 646:(to require that you be credited), or any tag 1912: 1563:legitimate talk page comments, as you did at 1411:All Wiki contribs. are, by agreement, in the 1258:the page that has been nominated for deletion 8: 2257:, and attempting to evade a block issued to 2003:(ref.:WQA 20090228 ) 'retires' for a while ( 1916:(ref.:WQA 20090228 ) 'retires' for a while ( 2388:Knowledge (XXG):The 1000 Challenge (Nordic) 943:Recovered from Fetler's attempt to suppress 1770:, least of all to engage in 'harassment.' 1280:the page or have a copy emailed to you. 583:to log in when I made the original edit). 544:Why do you keep reverting my edits of the 65:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 754:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions 674:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions 449:asserts he knows this and that simply by 1995:Contribution to Fetler's page preserved 1360:Again recovered from Fetler's would be 1181:and then the discussion pages, before: 1169:Edit made on ideas at anon. IP contribs 1027:Expect reasoning and debate in return. 2317:1st Wikiproject UK Politics Newsletter 441:unblock|Again ! Yes, and with respect 2225:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1870:This message is to inform you that a 1848:No, I didn't think you would have ... 7: 2384:Knowledge (XXG):The 10,000 Challenge 1649:Knowledge (XXG):Talk page guidelines 1613:Knowledge (XXG):Talk page guidelines 1359: 743:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 663:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 942: 35:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 14: 1952:Personally, if I never hear from 1655:Knowledge (XXG):Wikiquette_alerts 1619:Knowledge (XXG):Wikiquette_alerts 1308:are brought to public attention. 1968:(?) again, it will be too soon. 1642:I think this was meant for you: 1554: 1332: 738:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy 658:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy 487: 105: 1721:twice explaining my reasoning ( 1490:say and leave all criticism of 1449:expressed his admission of his 1081:ref. dated 11 September 2008). 1060:named albeit tangentially (... 794:category:Politics of Derbyshire 748:This is an automated notice by 686:Unspecified source/license for 668:This is an automated notice by 606:Unspecified source/license for 2374:Europe 10,000 Challenge invite 1994: 1201:08:41, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 1164:13:22, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 1122:why you're making the change. 1039:11:22, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 1022:11:14, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 926:investigation for sockpuppetry 782:08:48, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 761:20:35, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 681:20:34, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 572:10:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 465:can I associate myself with a 1: 2213:10:53, 17 November 2009 (UTC) 2107:Sorry we don't get along ... 2064:16:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 1908:17:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 1861:15:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 1843:13:21, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 1708:10:48, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 1682:09:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 1668:19:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 1632:19:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 1605:22:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 1585:22:03, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 1545:15:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 1530:remain spineless and supine. 1513:15:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 1423:made the remarks, didn't I ? 1376:11:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 1355:22:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 1323:16:18, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 1290:21:19, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 956:15:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 938:03:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 502:for the following reason(s): 379:I don't seem to be caught in 123:for the following reason(s): 2408:09:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC) 2369:16:06, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 2339:19:56, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 2309:18:39, 6 December 2009 (UTC) 2291:11:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 2275:17:37, 3 December 2009 (UTC) 2236:18:23, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 2188:09:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC) 1234:criteria for speedy deletion 1189:That's how we do it ! :-) 988:May I suggest, kindly, that 908:16:17, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 879:18:07, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 859:11:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 828:11:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 496:Your request to be unblocked 391:for trying to move this on. 245:16:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 223:15:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 207:11:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 188:10:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 165:09:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 148:17:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 117:Your request to be unblocked 55:How to write a great article 2255:Talk:Politico-media complex 2194:Talk:Politico-media complex 810:11:33, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 283:, who declined the request. 2423: 486: 170:The user who blocked you, 104: 2161:11:17, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 2144:05:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC) 2122:12:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 2081:I may not agree will all 2032:11:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 1990:13:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 1712: 1220:A tag has been placed on 1100:in the discussion pages. 718:(to release all rights), 638:(to release all rights), 535:10:28, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 518:10:35, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 420:guide to appealing blocks 410:10:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 267:09:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 75:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 2286: 2156: 1856: 1472:you excise this, it too 1400:that wishes to suppress 1371: 951: 777: 530: 262: 202: 160: 1713:On Lomcevak's Responses 1064:a member of parliament. 1056:you'll find that Engel 974:has been posted there. 2397:Ser Amantio di Nicolao 2346:WikiProject Derbyshire 2344:Courtesy message from 2251:Politico-media complex 2128:"here" if you wish!. 2089:to help you along ... 1651:for more explanation. 1615:for more explanation. 1419:talk page. After all, 1295:Promotion of Sam Ellis 1276:to request that they 1217: 1125:You 'exhort me' with: 1072:provide your reasoning 1044:Natascha Engel (Again) 787:WikiProject Derbyshire 697: 617: 276: 1339:ownership of articles 1337:Please do not assume 1216: 1140:I'm sure you will too 700:Thanks for uploading 696: 620:Thanks for uploading 616: 601:Image without license 481:from what I can see. 328:change block settings 275: 26:Hello, Lomcevak, and 1687:Response to Pretzels 1486:stand by everything 1468:Oh, and by the way, 724:|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} 702:Image:Engel UKMP.jpg 688:Image:Engel UKMP.jpg 644:|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} 2085:says, but here's a 1978:It's been real ;-) 1946:(blowing doors off) 1274:one of these admins 1206:Speedy deletion of 924:is currently under 509:Request handled by: 130:Request handled by: 2403:Lo dicono a Signa. 1795:to that nonsense. 1222:Samuel Colin Ellis 1218: 1208:Samuel Colin Ellis 698: 622:Image:Engel MP.jpg 618: 608:Image:Engel MP.jpg 277: 40:How to edit a page 2367: 2327:Subscription list 2307: 2273: 2134:comment added by 2040:discussion page: 1638:Fwd from Lomcevak 1476:be taken over to 1113:get the reference 1062:Natascha, who is 558:comment added by 524: 523: 154: 153: 145: 139: 94:|I (Lomcevak) am 2414: 2398: 2365: 2363: 2357: 2303: 2269: 2233: 2231: 2201:Peregrine Fisher 2146: 1872:Wikiquette Alert 1743:Others, such as 1664: 1628: 1581: 1565:User talk:Fetler 1558: 1351: 1336: 1286: 1253: 1252: 1246: 934: 725: 717: 711: 645: 637: 631: 574: 491: 484: 433: 427: 347: 345: 334: 316: 314:deleted contribs 274: 255: 220: 143: 137: 112: 109: 108: 102: 99: 85:Unblocking Stuff 80: 2422: 2421: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2406: 2396: 2376: 2362:(tell me stuff) 2361: 2355: 2349: 2319: 2297:User:Dsmith1usa 2259:User:Dsmith1usa 2243: 2234: 2229: 2223: 2197: 2171: 2129: 2009: 1997: 1922: 1868: 1829: 1824: 1715: 1689: 1662: 1640: 1626: 1592: 1579: 1552: 1459:Comment is Free 1386: 1365: 1349: 1330: 1297: 1284: 1250: 1244: 1243: 1211: 1171: 1079:article History 1046: 1003:Oh, and please 965: 945: 932: 918: 789: 768: 719: 715: 709: 691: 639: 635: 629: 611: 603: 597:Regards Fetler 580: 553: 542: 439: 431: 425: 424:, then use the 413: 393: 335: 325: 311: 294: 287:blocking policy 272: 249: 216: 110: 106: 89: 87: 78: 60:Manual of Style 19: 12: 11: 5: 2420: 2418: 2400: 2375: 2372: 2348: 2342: 2318: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2242: 2239: 2222: 2196: 2191: 2170: 2169:Natascha Engel 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2150: 2067: 2066: 2053: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2020: 2008: 1998: 1996: 1993: 1962:Matthew Newman 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1921: 1911: 1897: 1896: 1893: 1890: 1887: 1867: 1864: 1850: 1849: 1828: 1825: 1823: 1820: 1714: 1711: 1688: 1685: 1671: 1670: 1639: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1591: 1588: 1561:delete or edit 1559:Please do not 1551: 1548: 1388:To restore my 1385: 1379: 1364: 1358: 1343:Natascha Engel 1329: 1326: 1296: 1293: 1210: 1204: 1170: 1167: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1090:very important 1086:principal edit 1045: 1042: 964: 962:Natascha Engel 959: 944: 941: 917: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 888: 882: 881: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 833: 832: 831: 830: 788: 785: 767: 764: 746: 745: 740: 690: 684: 666: 665: 660: 610: 604: 602: 599: 579: 578:Natascha Engel 576: 546:Natascha Engel 541: 540:Natascha Engel 538: 522: 521: 504: 503: 492: 414: 400: 396:Decline reason 356: 352:Request reason 349: 270: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 227: 226: 225: 196: 152: 151: 125: 124: 113: 86: 83: 71:sign your name 63: 62: 57: 52: 47: 42: 37: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2419: 2410: 2409: 2405: 2404: 2399: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2373: 2371: 2370: 2364: 2359: 2358: 2347: 2343: 2341: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2316: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2247:Natasha Engel 2240: 2238: 2237: 2232: 2226: 2220: 2215: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2195: 2192: 2190: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2180:Sam Blacketer 2176: 2168: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2151: 2148: 2147: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2136:84.64.178.159 2133: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2108: 2105: 2102: 2101:prerogative. 2100: 2096: 2090: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2071:Postmodernism 2065: 2061: 2057: 2054: 2050: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2039: 2034: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2018: 2015: 2012: 2006: 2002: 1992: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1976: 1974: 1969: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1945: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1936: 1931: 1928: 1927: 1919: 1915: 1910: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1894: 1891: 1888: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1880: 1877: 1873: 1865: 1863: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1826: 1819: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1806: 1803: 1800: 1796: 1794: 1790: 1785: 1783: 1778: 1776: 1771: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1758:The case was 1756: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1741: 1739: 1735: 1730: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1710: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1686: 1684: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1669: 1666: 1665: 1658: 1656: 1650: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1637: 1633: 1630: 1629: 1622: 1620: 1614: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1589: 1587: 1586: 1583: 1582: 1575:. Thank you. 1574: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1557: 1550:February 2009 1549: 1547: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1531: 1527: 1524: 1520: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1499: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1466: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1431: 1429: 1424: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1413:public domain 1409: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1384: 1378: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1363: 1357: 1356: 1353: 1352: 1344: 1340: 1335: 1328:February 2009 1327: 1325: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1309: 1307: 1303: 1294: 1292: 1291: 1288: 1287: 1279: 1275: 1270: 1266: 1265: 1264:the talk page 1260: 1259: 1249: 1240: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1215: 1209: 1205: 1203: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1187: 1186: 1182: 1179: 1178: 1174: 1168: 1166: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1150: 1148: 1143: 1141: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1123: 1121: 1116: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1101: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1082: 1080: 1077: 1073: 1068: 1066: 1065: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1043: 1041: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1008: 1006: 1001: 999: 995: 991: 986: 983: 979: 975: 973: 968: 963: 960: 958: 957: 953: 949: 940: 939: 936: 935: 927: 923: 915: 909: 905: 901: 896: 892: 889: 886: 885: 884: 883: 880: 876: 872: 868: 867: 860: 856: 852: 847: 844:was a former 843: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 829: 825: 821: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 807: 803: 797: 795: 786: 784: 783: 779: 775: 771: 766:Release Added 765: 763: 762: 759: 755: 751: 744: 741: 739: 736: 735: 734: 731: 729: 723: 714: 707: 706:copyright tag 703: 695: 689: 685: 683: 682: 679: 675: 671: 664: 661: 659: 656: 655: 654: 651: 649: 643: 634: 627: 626:copyright tag 623: 615: 609: 605: 600: 598: 595: 591: 588: 584: 577: 575: 573: 569: 565: 561: 557: 550: 547: 539: 537: 536: 532: 528: 520: 519: 516: 513: 510: 506: 501: 497: 493: 490: 485: 482: 480: 476: 472: 468: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 444: 438: 437: 430: 423: 421: 412: 411: 408: 405: 399: 397: 392: 390: 386: 383:an anon-only 382: 378: 374: 370: 365: 361: 355: 353: 348: 343: 339: 333: 329: 324: 320: 315: 310: 306: 305:global blocks 302: 301:active blocks 298: 293: 288: 284: 282: 281:administrator 269: 268: 264: 260: 256: 253: 247: 246: 242: 238: 224: 221: 219: 214: 210: 209: 208: 204: 200: 197: 193: 192: 191: 190: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 168: 167: 166: 162: 158: 150: 149: 146: 140: 134: 131: 127: 122: 118: 114: 103: 100: 97: 93: 84: 82: 76: 72: 68: 61: 58: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 41: 38: 36: 33: 32: 31: 29: 24: 23: 16: 2402: 2377: 2353: 2350: 2320: 2244: 2216: 2198: 2175:undue weight 2172: 2117: 2112: 2110:Be well ... 2109: 2106: 2103: 2098: 2094: 2091: 2083:Peter Oborne 2078: 2068: 2035: 2027: 2022: 2019: 2016: 2013: 2010: 2004: 2001:Edit Centric 1985: 1980: 1977: 1972: 1970: 1951: 1934: 1932: 1929: 1925: 1923: 1917: 1914:Edit Centric 1900:Edit Centric 1898: 1881: 1869: 1866:WQA 20090228 1851: 1833: 1830: 1815: 1810: 1807: 1804: 1801: 1797: 1792: 1788: 1786: 1781: 1779: 1774: 1772: 1767: 1757: 1742: 1737: 1731: 1718: 1716: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1677: 1672: 1660: 1652: 1641: 1624: 1616: 1593: 1577: 1553: 1540: 1535: 1532: 1528: 1522: 1518: 1516: 1508: 1503: 1500: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1482: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1467: 1450: 1434: 1432: 1427: 1425: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1410: 1402:inconvenient 1401: 1397: 1389: 1387: 1383:Sockpuppetry 1366: 1347: 1331: 1318: 1313: 1310: 1298: 1282: 1268: 1262: 1255: 1241: 1229: 1219: 1196: 1191: 1188: 1183: 1180: 1175: 1172: 1159: 1154: 1151: 1146: 1144: 1139: 1137: 1124: 1119: 1117: 1112: 1104: 1102: 1093: 1089: 1083: 1075: 1071: 1069: 1063: 1057: 1053: 1047: 1034: 1029: 1025: 1017: 1012: 1009: 1004: 1002: 989: 987: 984: 980: 976: 969: 966: 946: 930: 919: 900:BulldozerD11 890: 851:BulldozerD11 820:BulldozerD11 802:BulldozerD11 798: 790: 772: 769: 747: 732: 699: 667: 652: 619: 596: 592: 589: 585: 581: 551: 543: 525: 508: 507: 499: 495: 494: 470: 466: 462: 458: 457:the case so 454: 450: 440: 435: 417: 415: 401: 395: 394: 380: 359: 357: 351: 350: 323:creation log 290: 278: 257: 248: 233: 217: 155: 129: 128: 120: 116: 115: 95: 88: 64: 25: 21: 20: 17:Welcome Info 2331:Road Wizard 2329:. Regards. 2130:—Preceding 2079:good faith. 1719:civil terms 1496:Memory Hole 1480:talk page. 1362:Memory Hole 1311:Cheers ;-) 1256:the top of 922:User:Fetler 871:Victuallers 846:Derby North 842:Greg Knight 554:—Preceding 385:range-block 2356:Rcsprinter 1787:And it is 1780:So, it is 1734:summarized 1465:for ex.). 1447:Alan Clark 1098:documented 1096:research, 994:discussion 891:Hand Hints 451:logging-in 389:TigerShark 319:filter log 79:{{helpme}} 67:Wikipedian 45:Help pages 2075:wordwooze 1971:But they 1926:no voice. 1753:Exhibit A 1749:glee club 1569:vandalism 1408:of Wiki. 1394:vandalism 1152:Be well. 1109:reference 1105:carefully 1054:carefully 1050:Vale Vets 1010:Regards. 758:MifterBot 750:MifterBot 678:MifterBot 670:MifterBot 498:has been 418:read the 387:. Thanks 369:checkuser 338:checkuser 297:block log 176:checkuser 119:has been 77:or place 69:! Please 2378:Hi. The 2283:Lomcevak 2209:contribs 2153:Lomcevak 2132:unsigned 2114:Lomcevak 2046:==Love== 2024:Lomcevak 2005:no voice 1982:Lomcevak 1918:no voice 1853:Lomcevak 1812:Lomcevak 1745:Pretzels 1674:Lomcevak 1590:Pretzels 1537:Lomcevak 1505:Lomcevak 1455:Thatcher 1430:to see. 1406:sections 1396:. It is 1368:Lomcevak 1341:such as 1315:Lomcevak 1193:Lomcevak 1156:Lomcevak 1031:Lomcevak 1014:Lomcevak 948:Lomcevak 840:Thanks, 774:Lomcevak 568:contribs 556:unsigned 527:Lomcevak 475:Raul 654 471:hundreds 467:specific 459:somebody 447:Raul 654 377:Raul 654 373:Raul 654 364:Raul 654 309:contribs 292:Lomcevak 259:Lomcevak 199:Lomcevak 157:Lomcevak 144:contribs 133:Jayron32 50:Tutorial 22:Welcome! 2241:Blocked 2219:WP:BITE 1663:retzels 1627:retzels 1580:retzels 1573:sandbox 1350:retzels 1285:retzels 1132:future. 1120:explain 1094:careful 972:warning 933:retzels 796:page. 713:PD-self 633:PD-self 500:granted 479:history 443:Stephen 429:unblock 332:unblock 252:unblock 237:Raul654 195:thanks. 174:, is a 172:Raul654 121:granted 92:unblock 28:welcome 2301:Hiding 2267:Hiding 2263:WP:ANI 2056:Fetler 1966:Levret 1964:) and 1958:Fetler 1835:Fetler 1760:raised 1727:reply2 1723:reply1 1700:Fetler 1597:Fetler 1302:Levret 1278:userfy 1269:speedy 1248:hangon 1076:second 990:before 895:WP:MOS 560:Fetler 371:(like 180:Stifle 2230:talk 2087:start 2038:Ellis 1954:Ellis 1519:loath 1463:Guido 1461:, or 1443:Ellis 1439:Engel 1306:Ellis 1147:again 1084:Your 998:notes 422:first 218:juice 213:Mango 2335:talk 2287:talk 2249:and 2205:talk 2184:talk 2157:talk 2140:talk 2118:talk 2099:your 2069:Now 2060:talk 2028:talk 1986:talk 1944:Done 1935:have 1904:talk 1857:talk 1839:talk 1827:Info 1816:talk 1704:talk 1678:talk 1601:talk 1541:talk 1509:talk 1474:will 1470:when 1451:lies 1441:and 1372:talk 1319:talk 1304:and 1230:etc. 1197:talk 1160:talk 1035:talk 1018:talk 1005:sign 952:talk 904:talk 875:talk 855:talk 824:talk 806:talk 778:talk 728:here 722:self 648:here 642:self 564:talk 531:talk 512:Step 404:Step 381:just 263:talk 241:talk 203:talk 184:talk 161:talk 138:talk 2207:) ( 1793:lie 1789:you 1782:you 1775:you 1768:you 1729:). 1523:you 1435:you 1428:all 1417:own 1398:you 1390:own 1254:to 515:hen 463:how 455:not 407:hen 360:not 342:log 289:). 96:not 2337:) 2299:? 2289:) 2265:. 2211:) 2186:) 2159:) 2142:) 2120:) 2095:my 2062:) 2030:) 1988:) 1973:do 1956:, 1933:I 1906:) 1859:) 1841:) 1818:) 1764:No 1755:. 1738:no 1732:I 1725:, 1706:) 1680:) 1603:) 1543:) 1511:) 1498:. 1492:me 1478:my 1374:) 1321:) 1251:}} 1245:{{ 1199:) 1162:) 1142:! 1115:. 1067:) 1058:is 1037:) 1020:) 970:A 954:) 906:) 877:) 857:) 826:) 808:) 780:) 720:{{ 716:}} 710:{{ 640:{{ 636:}} 630:{{ 570:) 566:• 533:) 432:}} 426:{{ 398:: 354:: 336:• 330:• 326:• 321:• 317:• 312:• 307:• 303:• 299:• 265:) 250:{{ 243:) 205:) 186:) 163:) 90:{{ 2366:@ 2333:( 2305:T 2285:( 2271:T 2227:| 2203:( 2182:( 2155:( 2138:( 2116:( 2058:( 2026:( 2007:) 1984:( 1960:( 1920:) 1902:( 1855:( 1837:( 1814:( 1702:( 1676:( 1661:P 1657:. 1625:P 1621:. 1599:( 1578:P 1539:( 1507:( 1488:I 1484:I 1421:I 1370:( 1348:P 1317:( 1283:P 1195:( 1158:( 1033:( 1016:( 950:( 931:P 902:( 873:( 853:( 822:( 804:( 776:( 562:( 529:( 346:) 344:) 340:( 295:( 261:( 239:( 201:( 182:( 159:( 141:. 135:. 111:Y

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index