Knowledge

User talk:Madjabuds

Source 📝

467:. If you has create a performance,a book,a musical composition, anything, and you know some links on the INTERNET to confirm this but not your-self commentary about it,then,you have the whole control on this situation because you are right. Now, for example I'm talking with you I have create a picture in my home,and you visit my home and see my picture.Ok,that confirm my explanation,but It don't have public relevance.In fact I like to draw very much and I have my own donations in the commons but I can say that I'm a famous painter and create my self article in Knowledge because that is not truth. I'm not doubt that you can be a talent person but if the world don't know your work like an artist but only like a famous porn star then it certainly are not encyclopedic.Maybe you like to write and play music like a hobby....I don't know. In that case I think that is better to put it in the seccion about your personal life but not like a part of your profession.So, I espect in the future enjoy your art. Regards. 23: 502:
omg an adult entertainer uses the internet. So naturally the best way to impress her, and totally even get laid, is to start talking about god, drawings in his house (I bet he really wants you to come over and see his drawings!) and other inane drivel in really heinous ... I can't even say English, it's not English, it's noobese or something.
383:
article. Your edits removed all the wikilinks from within the article. Also, the last few sections of the article were copied so that there were two External links sections, as well as two References sections, etc. If you would like to add cited information back to the article, that would be fine,
160:
I can see the problem with your photos.The problem maybe have solution or maybe can do more easy to resolv when you find other photos that you cosidered are really good.So if you are christian I tell you one thing that sure you have to now.For Christ those problems are absolutely insignficant,but the
501:
Besides the few people correcting your erroneous editing of your own wiki page, or telling you to curb your litigious comments, you seem to have encountered some complete twats. I just wanted to extend an apology from myself on behalf of the sane editors of Knowledge. Clearly they are bedazzled that
505:
Regardless, I hope you edit more than just your own article, and are here for more than just PR and spin control. You may find the Knowledge project quite engaging, it sucks you in pretty hard if you're academically focused or into learning and self improvement through education. Anyway, good luck,
161:
problem with your "real conviccion" is desicive. Please !don't loose your time with stupid things like that!.In my particular opinion you like more natural in the other fotos that you hate,because you dont't have so much make-up as in the other one. I am also Christian so I will try to help you.
96:
I noticed on the history section of this discussion page, your real (?) name appears. I googled it and it came up on Italian, French, Swedish, and Portuguese Knowledge (I guess its Swedish and Portuguese: sv.wikipedia.org / pt.wikipedia.org) and also at
66:
the way to go about removing it. As HalfShadow points out, Knowledge has a clear policy regarding legal threats which in part states: "Users who make legal threats will typically be blocked from editing indefinitely, while legal threats are outstanding."
299:
because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Knowledge (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its
336:
Sasha, can you write somewhere like your blog that you chose or suggested the title of the movie so that we can properly reference it? The XBiz article that's being cited about the movie doesn't mention it. Thanks.
481:
One thing that I like about you is that I can apreciate by yours self commentary that you are NOT a neutral person. Please don't let that this occupies a place in your life. Bye and good luck!God blesses you.
403:
to the last version of the article as you left it. You will see that there are two References sections, two External links sections, etc. There are also no wikilinks in the entirety of the Biography section.
137:"Unsigned", can one be more catholic than the Pope? Can a drunkard be a catholic? Can a scientist? Well, I think anyone can be a catholic if he/her wants to be one or is raised in a catholic family. 141:
Sasha, I haven't seen any movie of yours, but I'd like to take a written interview to you about your life and career. Please give me a sign on my discussion page if you agree. If not, it's ok.
97:
wikipedia.edu.pl/en/List_of_female_porn_stars_by_decade.html. You may want to ask the admins to remove the name from the revision history of this discussion page and those European Wikis.
463:
There's not problem if you can corroborate your controversial information.How?Simply. Albert Einstein is the creator of the relativity theory and a lot of people know this because it has
115:
Sorry.I am not an user but,I have a very small question. Please don't become brave with me beautiful young lady. Is it possible to be a catholic person and porn star at the same time?
259:
Otherwise, please remember that anything people construe as a legal threat will be removed and the editor leaving it will be blocked until the threat is withdrawn because of the
80:
That said, you are right about the license. We'll ask to have that edit removed from the article history. If you have further problems, please contact Tabercil or myself (or any
30:
could give editors of Knowledge the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Knowledge itself. Please note that this is
256:
If there's a specific issue you have with any Knowledge editor, we have ways of dealing with it of which I can enlighten you upon request.
530: 226: 168: 122: 515: 62:
Agreed. Madjabubs, I know you feel threatened by having a name end up appearing on Knowledge... but threatening legal action is
419:
Thanks for your editing on the Sasha Grey article. She is one of the best perfomers and a standard-bearer in the industry. --
296: 150: 130: 37: 45: 230: 534: 81: 172: 126: 511: 342: 322: 309: 249:
I've blanked your user page because another user was concerned it read like a legal threat - which we
526: 445: 222: 164: 118: 338: 318: 305: 301: 292: 146: 41: 356:
So I suppost today is your birthday.I had imaging that maybe you could result interesting the
265: 208: 507: 487: 472: 424: 411: 391: 365: 192: 441: 277: 260: 85: 53: 434: 142: 250: 68: 276:
The issue was about something that happened in July, and seems to be settled now. --
204: 49: 483: 468: 420: 406: 386: 361: 357: 185: 102: 22: 380: 48:. If you have a genuine dispute with the Community or its members, please use 27: 497:
Sorry, Wikipedian's aren't all illiterate creepy twats as you've encountered.
182:
Those comments were done by an Anonymous user that today is the user Vicond
496: 538: 491: 476: 449: 428: 413: 393: 369: 346: 326: 313: 280: 270: 234: 212: 188: 176: 105: 88: 71: 56: 218: 304:, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 521: 110: 400: 111:
Please don't become brave with me beautiful young lady
99:
Btw, thank you for sharing your beauty with the world
506:happy editing, and again sorry about the retards. 384:but please maintain the format and wikilinks. 8: 399:I have no idea what you think you did but 287:Copyright problems with Image:SG01.jpg 44:. Users who make such threats may be 7: 379:I reverted your recent edits to the 269:would like to show you some puppies 263:it has on free editing. Thanks! ➔ 14: 21: 189:15:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 36:under Knowledge's policies on 1: 516:15:46, 18 February 2013 (UTC) 429:18:57, 16 December 2008 (UTC) 347:18:27, 31 December 2007 (UTC) 327:09:12, 16 December 2007 (UTC) 314:09:12, 16 December 2007 (UTC) 281:22:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 271:20:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 213:23:01, 25 November 2007 (UTC) 177:14:29, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 131:03:59, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 456:The unverifiable information 297:Knowledge:Copyright problems 291:An image that you uploaded, 235:20:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 151:20:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC) 414:09:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 394:08:15, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 106:08:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 84:) and we'll try to help. -- 556: 492:02:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 450:01:43, 22 March 2013 (UTC) 370:05:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC) 156:The problem with the fotos 539:03:38, 20 June 2013 (UTC) 477:03:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 89:12:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 72:05:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 57:03:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 82:Knowledge:Administrator 295:, has been listed at 26:Your recent edits to 203:Do you speak Greek? 33:strictly prohibited 50:dispute resolution 529:comment added by 225:comment added by 179: 167:comment added by 133: 121:comment added by 547: 541: 465:public relevance 409: 389: 375:Sasha Grey edits 237: 162: 116: 25: 555: 554: 550: 549: 548: 546: 545: 544: 524: 499: 458: 405: 385: 377: 354: 334: 316: 289: 261:chilling effect 244: 220: 201: 158: 113: 19: 12: 11: 5: 553: 551: 543: 542: 498: 495: 457: 454: 453: 452: 417: 416: 401:this is a link 376: 373: 353: 352:Happy Birthday 350: 333: 330: 293:Image:SG01.jpg 290: 288: 285: 284: 283: 246:Hi Madjabuds! 243: 240: 239: 238: 200: 197: 157: 154: 139: 138: 112: 109: 94: 93: 92: 91: 75: 74: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 552: 540: 536: 532: 531:71.183.133.71 528: 523: 520: 519: 518: 517: 513: 509: 503: 494: 493: 489: 485: 479: 478: 474: 470: 466: 461: 455: 451: 447: 443: 440: 438: 433: 432: 431: 430: 426: 422: 415: 412: 408: 402: 398: 397: 396: 395: 392: 388: 382: 374: 372: 371: 367: 363: 359: 351: 349: 348: 344: 340: 331: 329: 328: 324: 320: 315: 311: 307: 303: 298: 294: 286: 282: 279: 275: 274: 273: 272: 268: 267: 262: 257: 254: 252: 247: 242:Legal threats 241: 236: 232: 228: 227:141.157.224.4 224: 219: 217: 216: 215: 214: 210: 206: 198: 196: 194: 190: 187: 183: 180: 178: 174: 170: 166: 155: 153: 152: 148: 144: 136: 135: 134: 132: 128: 124: 120: 108: 107: 104: 100: 90: 87: 83: 79: 78: 77: 76: 73: 70: 65: 61: 60: 59: 58: 55: 51: 47: 43: 39: 38:legal threats 35: 34: 29: 24: 16: 525:— Preceding 504: 500: 480: 464: 462: 460:Dear Sasha: 459: 436: 418: 378: 355: 335: 317: 264: 258: 255: 248: 245: 202: 184: 181: 159: 140: 114: 98: 95: 63: 32: 31: 20: 508:BaSH PR0MPT 358:George Sand 251:don't allow 221:—Preceding 169:200.0.24.58 163:—Preceding 123:200.0.24.58 117:—Preceding 17:August 2007 442:Epicgenius 381:Sasha Grey 278:AnonEMouse 86:AnonEMouse 54:HalfShadow 28:Sasha Grey 143:Calusarul 527:unsigned 339:Vinh1313 319:Vinh1313 306:Vinh1313 223:unsigned 165:unsigned 119:unsigned 69:Tabercil 42:civility 266:REDVEЯS 205:Reaper7 46:blocked 484:Vicond 469:Vicond 421:Jmundo 407:Dismas 387:Dismas 362:Vicond 360:life. 332:broken 199:Greek? 186:Vicond 103:Naerhu 435:That 535:talk 512:talk 488:talk 473:talk 446:talk 439:her. 425:talk 366:talk 343:talk 323:talk 310:talk 302:page 231:talk 209:talk 193:talk 173:talk 147:talk 127:talk 40:and 522:ಠ_ಠ 101:. 64:not 52:. 537:) 514:) 490:) 475:) 448:) 437:is 427:) 368:) 345:) 325:) 312:) 253:. 233:) 211:) 195:) 175:) 149:) 129:) 533:( 510:( 486:( 471:( 444:( 423:( 410:| 390:| 364:( 341:( 321:( 308:( 229:( 207:( 191:( 171:( 145:( 125:(

Index


Sasha Grey
legal threats
civility
blocked
dispute resolution
HalfShadow
03:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Tabercil
05:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Knowledge:Administrator
AnonEMouse
12:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Naerhu
08:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
unsigned
200.0.24.58
talk
03:59, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Calusarul
talk
20:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
unsigned
200.0.24.58
talk
14:29, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Vicond
15:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
talk
Reaper7

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.