30:
us that they are transformations of Nergal. At least he provides convincing information and connections. Second study is from 2017, just new. Therefore, Wensinck couldn't say something about Aksoy's thesis as you tried to mean. Since you have not read text by Aksoy, you are writing wrong or unnecessary points here. You may only say that
Wensinck was unclear about the origin of these figures or he said nothing about their origins. But if you write that "in stark contrast, scholar A. J. Wensinck found the association of Munkar and Nakir to the root NKR to be unlikely, thus rendering any relationship with Nergal tenuous at best," it means you just want to manipulate readers. One more time, of course Wensinck is certainly a great name, but like everyone else, he is not infallible...
383:
207:
503:
601:
26:
is not possible for the researcher to tell you something completely different from his text. Here is a link to his work and it is very clear what he is saying there. There is also an abstract in
English! Therefore it is uncorrect what you wrote here (in the balk for notes about adding and changing). If you could read Turkish, you could not write the researcher's surname incorrectly.
296:
156:
78:
285:
pages with related content, or on primary articles where ECP is not feasible, the 500/30 Rule may be enforced by other methods, including page protection, reverts, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters. Reverts made solely to enforce the 500/30 Rule are not considered edit warring
29:
Secondly; A.J. Wensinck is a great name in
Islamology. That's true. But the point is different. About a hundred years ago he wrote very short text about Munkar and Nakir -even not two pages- in the Encyclopedia of Islam and he said that the origins of these figures are unknown. Aksoy's research shows
25:
You say that you are contacted to Aksoy and according to you, he confirm what you say!!! First, let me say that personal contacts are not important. It doesn't mean anything in the scientific area or context. Even if you claim to have seen Munkar and Nakir, this fact does not change. ;) Moreover, it
33:
On the other hand, I urge you not only to look at
Wensinck's short article, which says 'their origin is unknown', before coming to a conclusion about Munkar and Nekir. Find an acquaintance and read Aksoy's extensive research in Turkish. If you re-do this kind of manipulation, you can be sure I don't
284:
All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing content within the area of conflict. On primary articles, this prohibition is preferably to be enforced by use of extended confirmed protection (ECP) but this is not mandatory. On
686:
Being a Public Health major, I vehemently disagree with your interpretation of Causal Pies being a merely "minor technique of presentation" when it is considered a very important theoretical model in describing the progression of diseases. Therefore, it deserves a page of its
725:
I have nothing to rebut as I'm not involved in whatever Stefka has insinuated. Edits that he has deemed to be evidence are based on an ad hoc rationalization process, something which I'm not even going to entertain.
709:
702:
22:
Obviously, you are new here and you have created a nickname to be able to change this page. First of all, welcome! I will have a few words about what you add to this page. I hope it works.
397:
You have shown interest in post-1978 Iranian politics. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose
418:
247:
240:
232:
228:
712:
to the talk page, if you would like to make a rebuttal to the evidence then you can create your own section on the evidence page, but please do not respond inline to the evidence.
255:
176:
34:
argue with you anymore. This is nothing but a friendly explanation. I hope you understand it. Please don't change the page as you did before! Greetings
326:
441:
658:
258:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
427:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
575:
553:
I'm not quite sure what you mean? Could you elaborate/provide examples of a photo that you're talking about and what you want done?
522:
561:
127:
662:
251:
402:
353:. The concern expressed is that you were a new person with less than 500 edits who was participating in the RfC. Thanks,
320:
312:
650:
612:
590:
398:
368:
350:
346:
654:
414:
236:
190:
180:
168:
224:
460:
410:
406:
172:
308:
84:
Hello, and welcome to
Knowledge. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to
579:
316:
300:
571:
452:
112:
637:
186:
160:
727:
688:
539:
477:
471:
456:
437:
424:
372:
358:
145:
130:
55:
52:
If you wish to discuss any disputations, you may address them on the article's Talk Page. Thank you.
35:
666:
39:
526:
304:
311:. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
633:
535:
How can I tag images I've made for follow-up by a Wiki artist who can provide a better image?
278:
632:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your
608:
594:
509:
388:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
268:
213:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
307:
seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your
554:
433:
354:
141:
101:
97:
89:
714:
367:
382:
206:
676:
626:
339:
171:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
502:
227:. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
100:, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please
625:
While all constructive contributions to
Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
264:
105:
643:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
119:
85:
671:
735:
720:
696:
680:
583:
564:
547:
485:
464:
362:
332:
295:
272:
194:
155:
149:
108:, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
77:
63:
43:
164:
394:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
219:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
179:. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
497:
710:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Iranian politics/Evidence
703:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Iranian politics/Evidence
620:
noevidencethis is more than a minor technique of presentation
163:. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
599:
76:
175:
and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
88:
has been undone by an automated computer program called
661:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
514:
123:
118:
The following is the log entry regarding this message:
521:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their
136:
ANN scored at 0.909341 on 2020-09-06T23:36:18+00:00
512:has been answered. If you need more help, you can
8:
513:
423:For additional information, please see the
246:For additional information, please see the
231:is in effect. Any administrator may impose
421:, when making edits related to the topic.
377:
243:, when making edits related to the topic.
413:– on editors who do not strictly follow
371:is covered by community sanctions under
235:on editors who do not strictly follow
7:
303:. An edit that you recently made to
494:How can I tag images for follow-up?
248:guidance on discretionary sanctions
627:deleted for any of several reasons
615:because of the following concern:
14:
501:
381:
345:Hello Maqdisi117. Your edits at
294:
205:
154:
223:You have shown interest in the
195:15:36, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
64:23:06, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
44:18:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
1:
574:might be able to assist you.
465:15:40, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
273:05:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
150:23:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
111:For help, take a look at the
708:I've moved your comments on
697:15:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
681:10:00, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
584:12:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
565:07:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
548:00:32, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
486:00:16, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
442:19:54, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
363:19:52, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
333:04:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
665:allows discussion to reach
646:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
525:, or consider visiting the
425:guidance on these sanctions
167:, but you didn't provide a
751:
736:02:26, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
721:23:01, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
657:exist. In particular, the
419:page-specific restrictions
369:People's Mujahedin of Iran
347:People's Mujahedin of Iran
241:page-specific restrictions
177:tutorial on citing sources
96:ClueBot NG makes very few
651:proposed deletion process
731:
692:
543:
481:
59:
638:the article's talk page
252:Arbitration Committee's
229:discretionary sanctions
623:
604:
572:Knowledge:Graphics Lab
287:
81:
663:articles for deletion
617:
613:proposed for deletion
603:
282:
225:Arab–Israeli conflict
80:
516:ask another question
415:Knowledge's policies
403:editing restrictions
237:Knowledge's policies
655:deletion processes
605:
317:AleatoryPonderings
305:Mohsen Fakhrizadeh
301:AleatoryPonderings
173:include a citation
82:
591:Proposed deletion
533:
532:
518:on your talk page
431:
430:
351:referred to at AN
19:Dear Maqdisi007,
742:
719:
717:
648:
647:
609:Causal pie model
602:
595:Causal pie model
559:
520:
505:
498:
475:
451:Notification of
385:
378:
298:
209:
187:Transcendental36
161:Transcendental36
158:
49:Dear Tarasyani,
750:
749:
745:
744:
743:
741:
740:
739:
715:
713:
706:
659:speedy deletion
645:
644:
600:
598:
555:
496:
472:Stefka Bulgaria
469:
457:Stefka Bulgaria
455:involving you.
449:
376:
343:
292:
261:
260:
210:
202:
169:reliable source
75:
12:
11:
5:
748:
746:
705:
700:
684:
669:for deletion.
649:will stop the
597:
588:
587:
586:
568:
567:
531:
530:
523:user talk page
506:
495:
492:
490:
448:
445:
429:
428:
386:
375:
366:
342:
336:
291:
288:
211:
204:
203:
201:
198:
138:
137:
116:
109:
106:report it here
74:
73:September 2020
71:
69:
47:
16:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
747:
738:
737:
733:
729:
723:
722:
718:
711:
704:
701:
699:
698:
694:
690:
683:
682:
678:
674:
673:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
641:
639:
635:
630:
628:
622:
621:
616:
614:
610:
596:
592:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
570:
569:
566:
563:
560:
558:
552:
551:
550:
549:
545:
541:
536:
528:
524:
519:
517:
511:
507:
504:
500:
499:
493:
491:
488:
487:
483:
479:
473:
467:
466:
462:
458:
454:
446:
444:
443:
439:
435:
426:
422:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
395:
393:
387:
384:
380:
379:
374:
373:WP:GS/IRANPOL
370:
365:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
341:
338:Mentioned at
337:
335:
334:
330:
329:
324:
323:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
297:
290:December 2020
289:
286:
281:
280:
275:
274:
270:
266:
259:
257:
253:
249:
244:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
221:
220:
218:
208:
199:
197:
196:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
157:
152:
151:
147:
143:
135:
132:
129:
125:
121:
117:
114:
110:
107:
103:
102:read about it
99:
95:
94:
93:
91:
87:
79:
72:
70:
67:
65:
61:
57:
53:
50:
46:
45:
41:
37:
31:
27:
23:
20:
17:
724:
707:
685:
670:
653:, but other
642:
634:edit summary
631:
624:
619:
618:
607:The article
606:
576:78.28.44.204
556:
537:
534:
515:
510:help request
489:
468:
453:possible SPI
450:
447:Notification
432:
396:
391:
389:
344:
327:
321:
313:my talk page
293:
283:
276:
262:
245:
222:
216:
214:
212:
184:
181:my talk page
153:
140:Thank you.
139:
133:
113:introduction
83:
68:
54:
51:
48:
32:
28:
24:
21:
18:
15:
299:Hello, I'm
159:Hello, I'm
66:Maqdisi117
728:Maqdisi117
689:Maqdisi117
557:CaptainEek
540:Maqdisi117
538:Thank you
478:Maqdisi117
434:EdJohnston
401:– such as
355:EdJohnston
349:have been
315:. Thanks!
279:WP:A/I/PIA
142:ClueBot NG
128:Maqdisi117
90:ClueBot NG
56:Maqdisi117
716:CodeLyoko
667:consensus
611:has been
417:, or the
399:sanctions
254:decision
239:, or the
233:sanctions
36:Tarasyani
527:Teahouse
390:It does
250:and the
215:It does
98:mistakes
476:: LOL.
309:sandbox
124:changed
120:Qira'at
86:Qira'at
636:or on
411:blocks
265:Shrike
165:Abraha
677:talk
508:This
409:, or
340:WP:AN
200:Alert
732:talk
693:talk
687:own.
580:talk
544:talk
482:talk
461:talk
438:talk
407:bans
359:talk
277:Per
269:talk
256:here
191:talk
146:talk
122:was
60:talk
40:talk
672:DGG
593:of
392:not
328:!!!
325:) (
322:???
217:not
134:(t)
131:(u)
126:by
734:)
695:)
679:)
640:.
629:.
582:)
546:)
484:)
463:)
440:)
405:,
361:)
331:)
271:)
263:--
193:)
183:.
148:)
104:,
92:.
62:)
42:)
730:(
691:(
675:(
578:(
562:âš“
542:(
529:.
480:(
474::
470:@
459:(
436:(
357:(
319:(
267:(
189:(
144:(
115:.
58:(
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
