Knowledge

User talk:Maxwallis

Source 📝

302:
Re Hinkley - your edits were generally unreferenced. There wasn't enough evidence for some of your later points, and I feel my text already referred to the issues raised by McEvoy in criticising the nuclear dumping, but if you can point to further information from a citation to a reputable third
291:
Regarding sources, it's important to always use independent, third party sources, rather than those connected to the Article. For example, you don't use a politician's official press releases, you use media coverage. It ensures trustworthiness. The rules on this can be found at
417:, since the Polonnaruwa rocks are discussed in that article. If you can provide sufficient new sourcing to justify expanding the section, it might be possible to then consider creating a new article on the rocks, but take particular note of 298:. Instead references are needed which show Nation has been commented on in major outlets such as the BBC, ITV, and reputable newspapers. I have however linked to the Nation articles so readers here can go and check it out for themselves. 285:. I'm afraid I don't agree with your contention I am biased against Neil McEvoy. I have edited pages about politicians of all stripes on Knowledge and have no like/dislike for the man. I hope you will follow the policy of assuming my 27: 118: 447:
in order to determine the most appropriate way of going about this. Be prepared to present secondary sources that would make the topic notable according to the
443:
You can always recreate the topic if you feel the topic is notable and the deletion discussion did not cover this appropriately. I suggest taking a read of
34: 208: 49:
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
164: 421:
requirements - the previous article was deleted largely due to use of poor sources, and to the absence of coverage in appropriate ones.
232: 361:
Consider this a last warning. The note at the top of the closed AfD discussion you insist on editing clearly and unambiguously states "
294:
As such, we can't just cite Nation.Cymru in its own article, we need to show how the website is notable and reputable in Wales as per
305:
I'm not critical of you personally - I'm just trying to ensure we have well referenced and impartial articles on topics about Wales.
46: 45: 39: 401:
This is an utterly pointless place to try to have a discussion about an article that has been deleted. When an AfD is closed,
141: 40: 159: 113: 414: 413:
if you want the AfD closure reviewed (though I very much doubt it will be reverted), or perhaps start a discussion at
213: 418: 237: 410: 300:
I have rewrote the bits about McEvoy's Plaid appeal to be sound more neutral, if you had any concerns about that.
426: 370: 188: 108: 103: 242: 346: 193: 381: 278: 456: 286: 248: 198: 311: 254: 136: 70: 422: 366: 50: 330: 326: 452: 340: 307: 295: 203: 55: 282: 398:
It also includes AfD talk pages, though I'd have thought that should be obvious.
444: 325:
Servus Max, I created an entry for the shell collapsar in the german Knowledge
53:. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! 405:. Participants are very likely to remove closed AfDs from their watchlists. 336: 448: 460: 430: 389: 374: 350: 315: 77: 380:
my apologies, for not understanding no "edits" includes additions.
407:
No decision concerning recreation of an article can be made there
365:". If I have to revert you again I will report the matter. 329:. Maybe you are interested in it, as you mentioned it in 399: 175: 90: 19: 8: 439:RE: your email about Polonnaruwa (meteorite) 363:No further edits should be made to this page 344: 411:Knowledge:Deletion_policy#Deletion_review 362: 281:. Thank you for your contributions to 216:– a Wizard to help you create articles 7: 14: 44: 38: 351:12:52, 24 September 2019 (UTC) 316:19:57, 13 September 2019 (UTC) 1: 109:The five pillars of Knowledge 86: 15: 461:08:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC) 431:19:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC) 390:18:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC) 375:18:21, 22 October 2023 (UTC) 119:Intuitive guide to Knowledge 78:05:15, 4 February 2014 (UTC) 35:sign your name on talk pages 415:Talk:Chandra Wickramasinghe 209:New contributors' help page 476: 419:Knowledge:Reliable sources 189:Frequently asked questions 165:Simplified Manual of Style 233:Contributing to Knowledge 160:How to develop an article 385: 303:party source, please do. 403:that discussion is over 199:Where to ask a question 128:Finding your way around 25:Hello, Maxwallis, and 449:notability guidelines 28:Welcome to Knowledge! 142:Department directory 451:. Hope this helps! 357:Editing closed AfDs 327:de:Schalenkollapsar 249:Knowledge etiquette 33:Please remember to 243:Join a WikiProject 114:How to edit a page 51:edit summary field 353: 270: 269: 266: 265: 262: 261: 172: 171: 137:Table of contents 85: 84: 64: 467: 238:Community Portal 224:How you can help 176: 151:Editing articles 91: 87: 76: 73: 67: 65: 62: 48: 42: 20: 16: 475: 474: 470: 469: 468: 466: 465: 464: 441: 359: 331:Hartland Snyder 323: 321:Shell collapsar 275: 225: 181: 152: 129: 96: 95:Getting started 81: 71: 68: 61: 56: 54: 12: 11: 5: 473: 471: 440: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 393: 392: 358: 355: 349:comment added 322: 319: 306: 304: 301: 299: 293: 290: 279:User:Maxwallis 274: 271: 268: 267: 264: 263: 260: 259: 258: 257: 251: 245: 240: 235: 227: 226: 223: 220: 219: 218: 217: 214:Article Wizard 211: 206: 201: 196: 191: 183: 182: 179: 173: 170: 169: 168: 167: 162: 154: 153: 150: 147: 146: 145: 144: 139: 131: 130: 127: 124: 123: 122: 121: 116: 111: 106: 98: 97: 94: 83: 82: 57: 23: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 472: 463: 462: 458: 454: 450: 446: 438: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 397: 396: 395: 394: 391: 387: 383: 379: 378: 377: 376: 372: 368: 364: 356: 354: 352: 348: 342: 338: 334: 332: 328: 320: 318: 317: 313: 309: 297: 288: 284: 280: 272: 256: 252: 250: 246: 244: 241: 239: 236: 234: 231: 230: 229: 228: 222: 221: 215: 212: 210: 207: 205: 202: 200: 197: 195: 192: 190: 187: 186: 185: 184: 178: 177: 174: 166: 163: 161: 158: 157: 156: 155: 149: 148: 143: 140: 138: 135: 134: 133: 132: 126: 125: 120: 117: 115: 112: 110: 107: 105: 102: 101: 100: 99: 93: 92: 89: 88: 80: 79: 74: 66: 60: 52: 47: 41: 36: 31: 30: 29: 22: 21: 18: 17: 442: 423:AndyTheGrump 406: 402: 367:AndyTheGrump 360: 335: 324: 287:WP:GOODFAITH 283:Nation.Cymru 276: 180:Getting help 104:Introduction 58: 37:by clicking 32: 26: 24: 345:—Preceding 72:talk to me! 204:Help pages 194:Cheatsheet 453:EvilxFish 382:Maxwallis 253:Practice 308:Llemiles 255:civility 409:. Read 347:undated 247:Follow 63:kriegls 296:WP:GNG 292:WP:IS. 273:Hello 457:talk 445:this 427:talk 386:talk 371:talk 341:talk 337:Swen 312:talk 343:) 277:Hi 43:or 459:) 429:) 388:) 373:) 333:. 314:) 289:. 455:( 425:( 384:( 369:( 339:( 310:( 75:) 69:( 59:D

Index

Welcome to Knowledge!
sign your name on talk pages


edit summary field
Dkriegls
talk to me!
05:15, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Introduction
The five pillars of Knowledge
How to edit a page
Intuitive guide to Knowledge
Table of contents
Department directory
How to develop an article
Simplified Manual of Style
Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Where to ask a question
Help pages
New contributors' help page
Article Wizard
Contributing to Knowledge
Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Knowledge etiquette
civility
User:Maxwallis
Nation.Cymru
WP:GOODFAITH

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.