75:
they are probably on the side of BH/KJA taking the books way apart from what FH would have done. It seems to be a motive for the vehemence in "making sure" the two sets of authors are differentiated. However in the context I was discussing it did not really apply other than in the essence of "This book provides this and not that" which to me doesn't matter since the article is about Paul, not the specific books. I personally think the point is moot since BH/KJA can do what they want. That is neither here nor there though. I was looking at the article as a whole and don't think including or excluding
Jessica would hurt the project. But as I had said I don't care enough to deal with those types. I have recently been looking through those again. I did years ago when I first started reading Wiki, though I have only recently gotten an account to edit. This kind of stuff is one of the main reasons I waited so long to sign up. Again thanks for the word.
105:, (b) they do not practice child sacrifice, (c) they are of high moral character, and (d) they are not anti-Jewish. Some Jews argue that not only does God have a relationship with all gentile monotheists, but that God also maintains a relationship with Hindus and other polytheists, as well as with members of other non-monotheistic religions such as Buddhism."
256:: "Terrorism is, most simply, policy intended to intimidate or cause terror. It is more commonly understood as an act which (1) is intended to create fear (terror), (2) is perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a materialistic goal or a lone attack), and (3) deliberately targets (or disregards the safety of) non-combatants."
74:
Thanks for that. That was my conclusion and why I decided not to bother with the page after my last post there. I see how with your Anirul article you specifically listed the info for each book with an obvious intent to list the specifics. I think a part of what I found from those editors is that
143:
The source OWOW may have inaccuracies with it. As long as the source says DDT, and based on my own observation in Triple H's matches, I named it
Flowing DDT because a standard/normal DDT can be called a Flowing DDT depending on how the wrestler executed the move (Like Triple H, he rapidly connects
241:
Hi there. Although I apologize if my edit was abrupt and not given proper discussion, I'd appreciate it if you'd assume good faith rather than immediately launching POV accusations. I have to take issue with the characterization of Ted
Kacynski as a "serial killer," and I believe that he can more
189:
Sorry if I am replying in the wrong spot. The problem I am having is there has been a tag for a photo on the
Pelican Bay Prison article, and there is now a phote there and has been for quite some time. A user had raised the question of the need for the tag and I wanted to remove it as they are
259:
The latter seems far more appropriate in
Kacynski's case, as his motivation was obviously political and not obviously for the purpose of gratification. I understand that there's been a discussion about his status as a "serial killer" in the past, with no consensus, but the title is tenuous at
131:
A Flowing DDT is a slight variation of the standard DDT in which he rapidly connects the move after another move, if you can't remember Triple H using the move then rely it on the source, he have possibly used it during his early career in the 90's or used occasionally at present.
190:
right in the tag be needless now. I simply cannot find "how" to remove the tag. I am not recognizing where on the edit page it is located. I was wondering what I am missing or if there is another avenue to removing tags I am not seeing. Thanks for the reply BTW
249:: "A serial killer is a person who murders usually three or more people over a period of more than 30 days with a "cooling off" period between each murder, whose motivation for killing is largely based on psychological gratification."
335:
Meph, please don't disappear from wp over this, it's not worth it. You are a great asset to the encyclopedia and I for one would be sorry to see you go. If you're fed up of
Kaczynski there must be other things you can
101:"Their beliefs have far more theological depth than ancient pagans, and they are well aware that icons they worship are only symbols of a deeper level of reality (though the same can be said of
39:
articles; while I tend to agree with their anti-prequel views I would never let those interfere with the creation of comprehensive or holistic articles (see my work on
261:
94:
In response to your question: "Do you have a source for your edit in the
Witchcraft article?", I will quote wikipedia's article named "
112:
95:
59:
for ways to arm yourself with
Knowledge policies which aim to tackle this sort of behaviour. You can always use
149:
137:
350:
342:
325:
315:
307:
265:
116:
108:
209:— I hope it was the one you were referring to? Also, I have replied to your e-mails. Best wishes, —
145:
133:
346:
321:
311:
303:
288:
284:
223:
177:
64:
163:
I have replied both to your e-mail and to your question on my talk page. :) Best wishes, —
191:
76:
246:
56:
40:
60:
52:
48:
44:
32:
280:
63:
as a venue for exploring your options too. Best of luck, and welcome to
Knowledge.
306:
before it was fully protected. Your thoughts and comments would be welcome on the
210:
164:
310:, as nothing much seems to be happening but the page is still locked. Cheers,
253:
35:. It's my experience that there's a tag-team of two editors who work across
354:
329:
269:
230:
199:
184:
153:
120:
84:
69:
98:" under the section called "Views on dialogue with non-monotheists":
31:
Hi there, I see you're wrangling with a couple of editors over at
320:
Seems like I was a few hours late in posting on your talk page!
43:), and I've also experienced problems in the past with their
206:
8:
279:Tnank'you for objection. I rectified. By.--
47:. You may want to check out WP policies on
23:This user is no longer active on Knowledge.
274:
242:aptly be described as a "terrorist".
7:
345:and I'd hate for it to go to waste!
96:Jewish Views of Religious Pluralism
14:
275:Well. You're right about atheism!
159:Re: Asking an experienced editor
55:and the templating page over at
1:
302:You were involved in editing
341:Moreover, I've just re-read
144:the DDT after another move)
140:) 2:27, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
245:From the wikipedia page on
205:As for the article, I have
371:
318:) 21:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
289:12:35, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
270:23:11, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
231:13:34, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
200:21:23, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
185:21:15, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
154:18:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
121:21:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
85:10:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
70:07:20, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
355:19:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
330:21:30, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
195:
80:
343:Talk:Theodore Kaczynski
53:no personal attacks
45:issues of ownership
304:Theodore Kaczynski
294:Theodore Kaczynski
227:
217:
181:
171:
111:comment added by
103:modern day pagans
362:
228:
225:
222:
218:
215:
182:
179:
176:
172:
169:
127:Re: Flowing DDT?
123:
67:
20:
19:
370:
369:
365:
364:
363:
361:
360:
359:
296:
277:
239:
224:
220:
211:
207:removed the tag
178:
174:
165:
161:
129:
106:
92:
65:
29:
24:
21:
17:
16:
12:
11:
5:
368:
366:
358:
357:
338:
337:
295:
292:
276:
273:
247:serial killers
238:
235:
234:
233:
160:
157:
146:TrueLicense909
134:TrueLicense909
128:
125:
91:
90:Re: Witchcraft
88:
41:Anirul Corrino
28:
25:
22:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
367:
356:
352:
348:
347:Bigger digger
344:
340:
339:
334:
333:
332:
331:
327:
323:
322:Bigger digger
319:
317:
313:
312:Bigger digger
309:
305:
299:
293:
291:
290:
286:
282:
272:
271:
267:
263:
262:209.89.155.96
257:
255:
250:
248:
243:
236:
232:
229:
219:
214:
208:
204:
203:
202:
201:
197:
193:
187:
186:
183:
173:
168:
158:
156:
155:
151:
147:
141:
139:
135:
126:
124:
122:
118:
114:
110:
104:
99:
97:
89:
87:
86:
82:
78:
72:
71:
68:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
42:
38:
34:
33:Paul Atreides
26:
301:
300:
298:MephYazata,
297:
278:
258:
251:
244:
240:
237:Ted Kacynski
212:
188:
166:
162:
142:
130:
102:
100:
93:
73:
36:
30:
113:24.61.36.87
107:—Preceding
66:Coldmachine
226:discussion
192:MephYazata
180:discussion
77:MephYazata
308:talk page
254:terrorism
109:unsigned
49:civility
281:Athex50
260:best.--
57:WP:WARN
18:Retired
61:WP:WQA
27:Advice
336:edit?
216:itias
170:itias
351:talk
326:talk
316:talk
285:talk
266:talk
196:talk
150:talk
138:talk
117:talk
81:talk
37:Dune
252:On
136:) (
353:)
328:)
287:)
268:)
221://
198:)
175://
152:)
119:)
83:)
51:,
349:(
324:(
314:(
283:(
264:(
213:A
194:(
167:A
148:(
132:(
115:(
79:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.