User talk:Mkativerata - Knowledge (XXG)

1224:. We have developed processes for dealing with problematic users. Suicide bombing is not an appropriate method for anyone to use. It is harmful to the project and to all users involved, including the suicide bomber. Sarek is still having to deal with the consequences of that. From various comments he has made, I think Sarek is now at a stage where he is unlikely to go rogue again, and I did briefly consider supporting, though I would like a little more evidence of emotional detachment (or, rather, evidence of appropriate tactics to deal with the emotional stress of editing Knowledge (XXG) - as there is inevitable emotional involvement). Looking at Sarek's unnecessary responses to some of the oppose comments, I'm not sure he is quite there yet. 1742: 4599: 4589: 2021: 2599: 1306: 1265: 3795:. Are you saying they're all wrong? Including academic books? It's all very well for you to edit, but not to charge in on a well-settled biography of a serving head-of-government and push your ill-informed agenda against editors who have read all the sources and know what they're talking about. As I said, you have better self-revert your last revert, because you have made four effective reverts in 24 hours and could be heading for a block. -- 46: 3968:

sources are academic. Anyway. One possibility that will allow us both to have our way is just to say "Mahathir's father, Mohamad, was Malay but also had ancestors from the Indian subcontinent". The term "Indian subcontinent" is useful because it accords with the first source I listed above, that Mahathir has no idea where in India his ancestors were from. And it covers your sources because Bangladesh is part of the Indian subcontinent.--

3202: 2356: 2396: 332:

way to respond to this case, when neither blocking nor protection is going to be an appropriate medium-to-long-term solution (as we both know he's been socking for four years and won't go away) is to have multiple people watching the target articles, and roll back every single edit of the sock on sight. This article is of a sitting Prime Minister, so there should be (but aren't) multiple watchers anyway. Perhaps

3528:

there was an RFC some time ago about non-admins closing discussions wasn't to be unilaterally reverted simply because the person isn't an admin. I've always felt I've been a decent judge of consensus but in the past the rule was always "unless consensus is so mind numbingly obvious that a complete moron would come to the same consensus that the result is X, don't close it" so glad that there's some leeway now.

3949:(India) it was mentioned too. Chittagong was under Indian Subcontinent at that time. And it is in southern part too. He himself said his Bangladeshi ancestors (see Malaysiakini article). You have 2 sources about his clear Kerala link. I have more about clear Chittagong link. You have said, "Go and edit something you are competent to edit" it doesn't seem good to me. I didn't provide info without references.-- 4410: 4221: 3010: 2938: 2802: 2284: 4538: 1135: 4505: 4495: 4316: 4306: 3256: 619: 21: 179: 2877:

thought you would be the address to request that now that he has been deported, he is worthy of his own page. I think his history and life merits an article. I for one, and I am sure many others, would like to know more about this person whose deportation has been in the making for decades, and has finally been achieved. Let me know what you think. Here are some of the sources:

4353: 4154: 4389: 4200: 1461: 3566:... I always right-click copy/paste names to avoid spelling errors, and I must have pasted instead of copying. It's actually par for the course for me today - so far I've dropped and broken my coffee cup, tripped over a shelf in a supermarket and burst a bag of apples in a different shop - I must have caught a "clumsy virus" or something... Just call me 3930: 2182: 1404: 3073:) actually indicate your objections, which I took to refer to sourcing. Do not ever address another editor (whether a fellow account-holding editor or an IP editor) in the terms you addressed to me, and please try to provide edit summaries that make clear to others your objection to an edit. As soon as I saw the edit summary from 4567:, as we seek to recognize those editors who impacted the project and are no longer contributing. Should you ever return or simply don't want to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Please do not see this message as any sort of prod to your activity on wiki, as we all would hope to enjoy life after having edited here. 2481:. And yet, in our proud amateur voice we say "making them the oldest known fossils of life on Earth." This should never have been posted and most certainly not with a blurb in those terms. I should not need to explain this to experienced administrators. Thank you for being the first admin to engage with the substance. -- 3408:

precisely no-one has said that they share this reservation. The comment has been sent off to the talk page anyway for some unknown reason. Thanks for dropping me a note here rather than there (and that's not a "you did me a favour" thanks but a "the approach you took is the better approach for wikipedia" thanks!). --

331:

I was just about to write another reply to you, having now seen the AN3 thread. "Open an SPI"? I mean, really... As if you don't have better things to do. From memory filing an SPI takes forever. The account should have been blocked on your request, the case being so clear. Although I reckon the best

294:

Oh yes, it's definitely him. It's just easier to roll back each edit than go through the tedious report-block-new sock-report-block cycle, right? Best to keep him on one account too. Protecting the page wasn't the right move either. I've been slowly improving that article for weeks and now I can't...

4100:

Haha, indeed: "edit-warring" and "disruptive editing" (I just checked your log; looks like mine) are what I like to think of as "honourable blocks". It's that extra revert because you cared too much, or because the other editor was so ridiculously wrong. I've always thought there to be one important

3527:

Heh, yup. I don't think I'll ever run for RFA, simply because there's no need (and also because the thing is frankly torture, I remember 2011) but even to this day it baffles me that some people don't understand that a majority vote does not necessarily equal consensus. I was encouraged to read that

2456:

Hi Mkativerata. You've been talking a lot about cock-ups and fake news and the big picture, but never actually explained, in specific terms, your profound objections to this most reprehensible of ITN blurbs. Why not try to make things better instead of edit warring over the archival of a thread that

793:

Hi Mkativerata, I wanted to thank you for putting the time, effort, and detail into researching and writing about my AfD experience. It's certainly made my RfA better and I appreciate the feedback. If you are no longer following the page, I think you might appreciate my answers to Q5–7 (questions by

3385:

Hi. I'm not sure why you think it's bad form for a candidate to thank people. It cannot conceivably count as canvassing. And thanking opposers could appear insincere and sarcastic. Or would actually be insincere. In any case, I think it's a bit over the top and would gently invite you to remove the

3077:

with a link to the article suggesting Faulkner's coming out was a hoax, I self-reverted, which shows that clear and civil comments are much more appropriate and effective. WP is a much nicer place when colleagues treat one another with politeness and consideration, and I hope that you will reflect

2767:

I think it would be beneficial to confirm whether it is a joke or not. Please note that at the top of an RfA the votes are tallied based on how many votes are in the section (the page can't detect what's actually written), and it says the same on the RfA page, so according to the tallies it's S80,

309:

The admin poo-poo'd my comment on the edit warring message board, too. This is ban evasion so the warning above is inappropriate; you might want to note that in your edit summary so you aren't blocked when you shouldn't be. I'm watching the page now, too. How do you want to handle this? If I'm

382:

Sounds like a plan to me. I'm watching him, and the PM's page. I also left a note on Bbb23's page suggesting minimal due diligence might be in order next time. This one ain't rocket science. But in truth, I can see the merit of keeping the one account active so we can keep Roman corralled. I

3967:

southern India. I know you have some sources, but they amount to very little when stacked up to those I've set out above. It's not a matter of numbers; it's about quality. My sources are mostly academic and in one case is a biography based on interviews with Mahathir and his family. None of your

3620:

was surprisingly refreshing. In my opinion, opposed to what I've seen to a great extent on Knowledge (XXG), you overcame your own biases and sided with policy. Because of your clarity, I hope that you might be open if I reach out to you for feedback every once in awhile regarding my own editing.

2504:

took action during the middle of an active discussion that seemed poised to sway consensus. Having read the articles you linked, it does seem like the scientific community has put up some resistance to these claims. I'm genuinely not sure whether this sort of skepticism is typical in the wake of

722:

Mkat, I've been following the RfA for Czar, including some of the back-and-forth in the oppose section. Comments have been made about "badgering" of the "oppose" !voters, including yourself. Given that I was one of the commenters in that section, I hope that you did not perceive my comments as

3407:

It's certainly not canvassing. But it also isn't a "thanks for doing something good for wikipedia", because they would be sent to opposes, neutrals and neithers. So it's a "thanks for doing me a favour", which is ok in some contexts doesn't sit well with me in the RfA context. Having said that,

2876:

to Germany for prosecution, and discovering that every news outlet is covering the story, I was surprised to see that this man has no Wiki article. I discovered that he did have one, but it was deleted and a redirect put in its place. Since you are the editor that oversaw the deletion debate, I

811:

Thanks for your note, Czar. Yes - I did see you responses to the questions, and thanks for taking the time to do that. I don't think my oppose ever had a chance of causing a pile-on—if it did, I might have done something different—but your answers ensured that would be the case. Anyway, I look

1242:

Noted, thanks. My intention isn't to second-guess the Arbcom findings; far from it. It is to take the evidence presented to show that he is a very competent editor. For me, competence is the most important trait in a candidate for administrator. I'm far more willing to forgive and forget

2814:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3809:

I am repeating again Chittagong is situated in the southern Part of Bangladesh and Bangladesh was under Indian Subcontinent at that time. You are saying that all references of notable Bangladeshi dailies are false? He has said that his grandfather was from Chittagong, see in English on

3111:

Oh and by the way, you clearly thought it was REALLY IMPORTANT that JF’s page URGENTLY record the fact of him being gay and the identity of his partner. Now you know that it’s all wrong and that he is straight, will you edit the page to record that fact? And in an equal hurry? Why not?

2950:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3681:

Recently, you've revertd my edit on that page. When he has come to Bangladesh for last time he had said that his grandfather was from a village of Chittagong. Later, it was found by Bangladeshi newspapers that his grandfather was from Moriomnogor Village of Chittagong. Malaysian

3596:

Actually, I have 6 more identical ones so I cared more about cleaning up the 200 pieces it shattered into than the fact that it was broken. The apples were more of a problem because I'd already paid for them and now they are bruised... Ah well, things can only get better...

1312: 1305: 2505:

extraordinary discoveries or breakthroughs, regardless of their credibility or level of scientific rigor, or if the guys are quacks and we're helping them advertise their fringe theories. I do suspect that the latter is exceedingly unlikely for findings published in

3982:

Probably, it is the best option. He had once said he had no idea about his ancestor's home. Some researchers have found his Kerala link too. But in 2014 he had said about his Chittagong link when he had come in Bangladesh. My references are based on his speech in

58:

Note: If you post me a message here, I'll respond here, so please put my talk page on your watchlist if you are expecting a response. I don't leave talkback thingies. Likewise if I leave a note on your talk page, I will watchlist your talk page for any

3938: 2296:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1514: 887: 2536:) despite all evidence to the contrary. This shouldn't need to go to WP:ERRORS. I oppose the posting in its entirety - not even the caveats are enough - so put it in ITN/C rather than WP:ERRORS. Post-posting opposes are a common practice. -- 3880:. New Straits Times, one of Malaysia's leading newspapers: "Dr Mahathir‘s grandfather, Iskandar, was brought to Malaya from the South Indian state of Kerala by the British East India Company to teach English to the royal Kedah household." 3704:

Kerala is not in Bangladesh. All non-Bangladesh sources say his grandfather was from Kerala. That includes his biography. The Bangladesh sources must be wrong. You’re reverting against the vast majority of the reliable sources. Stop it.

702:

Indeed -:). I thought a little levity was in order after the last week's RfA dramas. Hopefully, you're next one will be free of such things. And yes, there's another grammar error in the foregoing sentence just for good measure. Cheers,

3868: 3793: 3873: 3859: 3790: 3787: 2499:

I don't think it's fair to fault the posting admin – ITN operates by consensus, and after more than a day of discussion, there was a strong consensus for posting and no objections having been posted in several hours. It's not as if

1492: 1271: 1264: 1502:" for FAC 8 days ago, but I haven't had any comments. As you commented in the previous one, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind re-reading and seeing if I have address your comments from the previous nomination. Thanks. — 2690:

Which is, on my incredibly cursory look at the content dispute, a fair viewpoint to hold. But we don't go disrupting the whole place just to make a point. We have processes like ERRORS in place for situations like this.

2474:

Read Andrew D's comments, which the posting admin should have done. Then look around to see just how controversial among experts, and hedged by the paper's own authors, the claim that these are the oldest fossil is:

4453: 4264: 2978: 2842: 2324: 1149: 2457:

should have ceased to be active days ago? You're far more likely to cause the item to be reworked or pulled by calmly explaining where we went wrong than simply cursing at us and accusing people of admin abuse. –

675:

This is to inform you that the Knowledge (XXG) Grammar Police have detected a split infinitive in one of your edits. This type of behavior gives the encyclopedia a bad name and will emphatically not be tolerated.

1974:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1919:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1341:

Could you please look at my responses to your points and let me know if you have any further concerns? The review seems to have stalled (for the fourth times), so your help would be very much appreciated.--

2675:

Thanks Ed, fair call, it's just that unlike the numerous admins who have ignored my pleas for accuracy over many hours now, I'll put accuracy over 3rr and would do so again. We still have a fucked-up ITN

1645:

I don't think "pleasure" referred to an admin who protected an article in an edit war, was accused of abuse (because he had expressed an opinion) and left blocking himself. I seriously miss him and his

2573:. We're all working to contribute to the sum of all knowledge. But it's a lot harder to do that when someone is lobbing bombs all over the place. Please, a little collegial discourse can go a long way. 2533:

Your last question gets to another corker: the nomination itself uses caveats, including "which would make them the oldest fossils of life on Earth." Yet the posting admin unilaterally went for broke (

2882: 1816:

Thanks, it's an old friend! I don't know what your Malay is like, but "puki" is, well, a rather rude word. Maybe an admin talk page stalker will block him: I couldn't be arsed filing another SPI!! --

4437:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4248:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2962:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2826:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2308:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2042: 2037: 4056:

Thanks for the note, Atsme - I used to be one, but I couldn't do that to myself again, and, for a number of entirely valid reasons including recent block log, I would fail an RfA resoundingly! --

4423: 4234: 2242:. I hope you are well. The day job has been getting in the way for some time now, but maybe there will be light at the end of the tunnel soon! I've certainly not disappeared for good. -- 3062: 552:

Hehe, this is an old prank and, WCM, if it makes you feel any better, someone always falls for it and usually much harder than you did (like writing a strong rebuttal of the 'oppose').

1676:

No, "pleasure" did not refer to that! I will have to decline the Beethoven invitation, I'm afraid; I just don't have the time to do a proper job on that kind of thing at the moment. --

3021: 2197: 441:

Discussion should be made and getting input from other wiki members, before any changes. Again you define in which ever you want because wikipedia is not your POV for editing war.

1419: 4647: 4642: 3814:. In that article, it was said that it will be a surprise news to Malaysian that he is of Bangladeshi descent. I have given 5 Bangla references (one is from Indian Dailyhuny)-- 2476: 1706: 1699: 2400: 4078:- things aren't always what they seem. Your's would not have changed my mind. Common sense is not so common anymore, so when I see it, it's exciting...like watching the 3150:

no that was succinct - thank you. Succinct but stupid: the real problem with Knowledge (XXG) isn’t the people who swear at shit editing but, of course, the shit editing. —

3828:

All the sources other than your Bangladesh sources say he is from Kerala or southern India. That's the vast majority. Go and edit something you are competent to edit. --

3861:. This is the leading biography on Mahathir, written by Barry Wain. He says in the linked page: "A forbear, most likely Mohamad's father Iskandar , had emigrated from 2716:

actually looks like a genuine oppose (it would be easy to miss when those edits were made). Could you clarify a little if your vote is meant to be sarcastic? Thanks,

3450:

I remember you - saw your name pop up and thought I'd say hello. You might not remember me, I used to be known by a different name (Steve Zhang). Hope you're well!

953:

Hi Mkativerata. No frills - just a quiet ‘’all the best’’ to you for 2015 and I hope you’ll continue to be around on Knowledge (XXG) for a long time to come. --

1709:, which brings the opinions expressed into question. Please indicate if this assertion in any way affects your position with respect to the proposed move. Cheers! 972:

Hi Mkativerata. No frills - just a quiet ‘’all the best’’ to you for 2015 and I hope you’ll continue to be around on Knowledge (XXG) for a long time to come.--

3469:

G'day Steven -- it's great to hear from you. I hope that you, too, are well. At the moment I seem to duck in here for a few weeks or so every couple of years. --

1520:

I responded to your comments nearly a month ago. Any chance you could follow up on your original comments and help get the article over the line to FA status? –

1650:. - Would you dare to close Beethoven? I asked Opabinia regalis before, who declined - which made a lot of sense to me, but you already survived the moonlight 2576:

And on a final administrative note, I or another admin will block you if you choose to revert over on ITNC again. Do note that you should be blocked already.

1297: 3433: 3397: 851: 1867:

Thanks for the message. Yes - just time off - not due to WP but being busy at work. Hopefully I can drop back in come the new year. I hope all is well. --

2219:

Hi. Just noting so that you know I've noticed: I haven't seen you around much for quite a while now. I hope everything is OK. Miss your votes at RfA. --

3778: 1741: 4606: 3946: 3870:. This is an academic history of modern Asia. It says: "Though through his father's side he could trace his origins to Kerala in Southern India..." 3728: 2738:

You could see it as a joke. Or you could see it as a semi-regular test of the levels of idiocy on wikipedia. Quite high at the moment, it seems. --

3506: 514: 475: 3689:

Probably it is a misunderstanding among Malaysian dailies. When his grandfather had come to Malaysia, Bangladesh was under Indian Subcontinent.--

2768:

O0, N0. If you are genuinely opposing the candidate, please move the vote to the oppose section, so that it can be tallied as an oppose. Thanks.

3061:

of an edit of mine is unacceptable in tone and in content. Even assuming you knew that Faulkner's coming out was allegedly false (as suggested

2566:

is the place to have a discussion about main page items. I know that any action will take longer than you'd like, but that's by systemic design.

627:

Message added 02:53, 19 November 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

1574: 1319: 1278: 3505:

Haha, yes, well, maybe one has to be Australian, or perhaps alternatively from select industrial towns in northern England, to understand why

3223:

You have more than enough experience here to know this - it is currently at AFD, it cannot be blanked or removed, which includes redirection.

2631: 847: 3017: 2175: 1397: 493:

I'm glad I saw this, I was on my way here to lambast you for an obviously frivilous Oppose !vote... Moved it back, also: ha ha, very funny.

4475: 4286: 3888:

or Kerala. That's why, for about a decade, our article has said Mahathir's paternal ancestry is partly Indian. Until you showed up today.--

3731:(India) it was said that his grandfather was from Chittagong. And Chittagong is not India. If you have done again, it will be complained.-- 2992: 2856: 2338: 1999: 1944: 925:, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings! 2124:

Yes, I am, only too many die. Did you check out Happy 2019 then? Click again, am I happy I wrote his article for birthday not funeral. --

4075: 2404: 1653: 522: 483: 774:

Mkativerata, your oppose vote wasn't enough to prevent me supporting, but it was well researched and politely formulated. Thank you. --

35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 2760: 448: 3267: 3210: 3135:

is unacceptable. Please speak decently to others, and give reasons when you revert them. I hope this message isn't too long to read.

2364: 2777: 794:

Dirtlawyer1, prompted by your concerns, and about my breadth of editing experience). Have a happy Thanksgiving, and see you around.

2878: 2649: 230: 3289:

I don't keep spam however it is against the giant bolded template on the page to remove an AFD notice that is still active. Stop.

3037: 1439: 27: 4471: 4282: 2988: 2852: 2334: 1995: 1940: 1155: 1143: 738:

Not at all... So far as I can tell, the criticism of "badgering" is criticism directed at one or two others, and not at you. --

166: 160: 154: 148: 142: 136: 130: 124: 118: 4446: 4364: 4257: 4165: 3865:

to begin a new life in Malaysia." Mahathir is then quoted as saying "Frankly, we don't know which part of India we came from."

3639:

Thanks for that. I appreciate the kind note. And yes, happy to field any questions. Don't take too many cues from me, though:

3206: 2971: 2835: 2657: 2360: 2317: 242: 198: 3303:

It's also against wikipedia policy -- far more important policy -- to insert spam, which you have done on three occasions. --

844:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 112: 106: 100: 94: 88: 82: 76: 70: 64: 3878: 3781: 2661: 2627: 2149: 1074:

I've un-"fixed" it because I'm pretty sure you're clever enough to know what you're doing, but just revert me if I'm wrong.

246: 3988: 3954: 3819: 3736: 3694: 2753: 2068: 1014: 499: 2872:

Hi, I am not sure if this is the right way to make this request, but after hearing this morning about the deportation of

2205: 1647: 914: 837: 3261: 3218: 2606: 2372: 1986:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1931:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

252: 4458: 4269: 3097:

I didn’t read this message it was too long I assume it’s a mea culpa for fucking up a blp in which case no worries. —-

2983: 2847: 2479: 2329: 1991: 1936: 517: 478: 3875:. An academic book on Malaysian foreign policy. It says "Mahathir's paternal grandfather of Kerala Indian descent..." 1111:

I got a kick out of it myself. I have seen you play this game before; I felt honored that you played it at my RfA. --

310:

reading this right, you're good to leave him alone on this one account for now. I'm happy to do what you prefer. --

2894: 1606: 1549: 1355:

Thanks for the reminder. I'll re-visit the article over the weekend and try to force myself to arrive at a view. --

836:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

723:

badgering you because that was certainly not my intent. I thought your concerns were worthy of being addressed.

2368: 1773: 1222:

deliberately focusing on a user, and engaging in edit wars with that user with the intent of getting them blocked

637: 4605:

You have been inactive for more than 6 months and have been removed from the Knowledge (XXG) Birthday Committee

2623: 2615: 238: 210: 186: 4620: 4575: 4376: 3984: 3950: 3815: 3732: 3690: 3582:

Haha, no worries, and it is good to hear from you again. I’m sorry in particular to hear about the coffe cup! —

3535: 3494: 3457: 3013: 2513:

would be warranted. Out of curiosity, if you knew the blurb had to stay, how would you reword or improve it? –

1852:

Hey. I hope you're just taking a little time off to recharge the batteries. Still hoping to see you around.

1499: 4434: 4245: 4119:

of honorable block logs, and who would probably be a favorite at RfA - including admin votes...and mine!! 😂

3339:

I don't think you are a spammer. You are just editing incompetently and getting in the way of spam removal. --

3271: 3214: 2959: 2823: 2305: 4129: 4092: 4047: 2408: 2201: 452: 3784: 2890: 444: 4549: 2713: 2522: 2466: 2189: 2161: 2129: 2096: 2076: 2058: 1663: 1586: 1443: 1170: 1059: 913:, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user an 812:

forward to seeing you around (perhaps, if you are interesting in performing AfD closures, you might visit

688:

Thanks for the warning. So if I get caught doing it again, I'll have to humbly submit myself to Arbcom? --

511: 472: 2653: 1987: 1932: 234: 202: 194: 2909: 2886: 2774: 2145: 1886: 1857: 1602: 1564: 1545: 1185: 1083: 761: 728: 531:

Don't worry, I got as far as moving it and almost pressing save page before my joke detector kicked in.

4544:

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. take care and enjoy what you do --

1221: 908: 756:

Good. I value our working relationship. You're handy to have around, and I would hate to lose that.

4598: 4588: 3180:

Thanks mate, that's great. That's a big one from memory. I hope the priority system kind of worked. --

1220:

Regarding your extended comment on the ArbCom case. Sarek wasn't admonished for edit warring, but for

4181: 3362: 3330: 3294: 3279: 3229: 2728: 1835: 1770: 1435: 1386: 661: 543: 279:

This looks a lot like our old pal Roman888. "serial vandaliser" is a favorite expression of his. --

4515: 4417: 4326: 4228: 3926: 2946: 2810: 2570: 2292: 2274: 1963: 1954: 1908: 1899: 4614: 4569: 4371: 3918: 3662: 3627: 3530: 3489: 3452: 3074: 1524: 1049: 1025: 4430: 4241: 2955: 2819: 2563: 2510: 2301: 1983: 1967: 1928: 1912: 1802: 3922: 3140: 2925: 2428: 2380: 1313:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/City of Angels (Thirty Seconds to Mars song)/archive4

1233: 1116: 583: 326: 3483:

It just dawned on me from your edit to Cameron Smith and the G'day above that you might be from

3353:

Then go file a report at ANI, because right now all you're doing is casting aspersions which is

2020: 383:

haven't left a message outing him (my usual practice) on his talk page for just that reason. --

355: 333: 261: 205:

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

1013:- it's being counted as a support, not an oppose, because you put it in the wrong section. See 4545: 4519: 4330: 4079: 3427: 3391: 2921: 2752:

Or it could be seen as near-trolling. An interesting choice to present other editors with. —

2515: 2459: 2261: 2224: 2157: 2125: 2092: 2072: 2054: 1806: 1659: 1582: 1465: 1411: 1166: 977: 958: 934: 867: 779: 497: 418: 388: 315: 284: 4442: 4253: 3745:

that malaysiakini link is not a news article. Stop editing on topics you know nothing about.—

3318: 2967: 2831: 2619: 2313: 1979: 1971: 1924: 1916: 4465: 4276: 4102: 4101:

missing element from our blocking policy: admins don't block editors for making bad edits --

4057: 3998: 3969: 3889: 3829: 3796: 3764: 3746: 3706: 3643: 3599: 3583: 3572: 3514: 3470: 3409: 3340: 3304: 3240: 3181: 3171: 3170:

Just informing you that I've completely cleared out the "top priority" portion of the case.

3151: 3113: 3098: 3088: 2769: 2739: 2677: 2637: 2537: 2482: 2442: 2243: 2107: 1882: 1868: 1853: 1817: 1719: 1677: 1624: 1560: 1477: 1356: 1346: 1331: 1244: 1199: 1181: 1097: 1075: 988: 817: 757: 739: 724: 689: 598: 553: 341: 296: 45: 4564: 4445:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4438: 4256:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4249: 3760: 3354: 3322: 2970:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2963: 2834:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2827: 2316:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2309: 1982:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1975: 1927:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1920: 1759: 813: 4173: 4123: 4086: 4041: 3358: 3326: 3290: 3275: 3225: 3026: 2717: 2598: 1831: 1423: 1382: 657: 532: 359: 265: 1619:

My pleasure :) Of course, it's a serious point too: I have a great deal of sympathy with

1243:

non-malicious behavioural indiscretions than I am to turn a blind eye to incompetence. --

3884:

All of these sources state not only that Mahathir's grandfather is from India but from

3657: 3622: 1521: 1503: 1286: 1285:

I made some changes based on your comments, but I have questions about some others. —

1042: 1018: 920: 798: 665: 3941:(newspaper's sub editorial) it was mentioned about his Bangladeshi ancestors. Even in 3201: 2562:

Look. Knowledge (XXG) operates on collaboration and consensus. You already know that.

2355: 1573:

I liked the comment a lot, but I don't like the header here, because it reminds me of

4636: 3510: 3325:

and stop edit warring. You may not blank, redirect or remove the AFD notice. Period.

3136: 2692: 2665: 2577: 2569:

Now, on your attacks on other editors. Never forget that we're all here for the same

2423: 2376: 1515:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/2008 UEFA Champions League Final/archive2

1226: 1112: 858:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

579: 413:

I just left a message for Moonriddengirl. Hopefully she can take out the trash. --

4537: 3934: 3683: 3423: 3387: 2917: 2501: 2257: 2237: 2220: 1134: 973: 954: 930: 863: 859: 841: 775: 704: 677: 647: 509:

Ah apologies, red faced, I will be flagellating myself with a large wet trout etc.

494: 414: 384: 311: 280: 4409: 4220: 2937: 2801: 2283: 3213:

notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at

3084: 2873: 1710: 1342: 1327: 1236: 190: 4504: 4494: 4315: 4305: 3255: 4120: 4083: 4038: 337: 20: 3942: 3811: 3724: 2367:

by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at

1493:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Only Girl (In the World)/archive2

1272:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Only Girl (In the World)/archive1

3484: 2422:

You know you've hit 3 reverts. You probably would do best to stop that. --

2626:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 1578: 886: 4627: 4582: 4553: 4526: 4479: 4382: 4337: 4290: 4193: 4132: 4110: 4095: 4065: 4050: 4006: 3992: 3977: 3958: 3897: 3837: 3823: 3804: 3772: 3754: 3740: 3714: 3698: 3668: 3656:

That's funny, but maybe with the blocks comes even more wisdom. Thanks! --

3651: 3633: 3603: 3591: 3576: 3541: 3522: 3500: 3478: 3463: 3437: 3417: 3401: 3366: 3348: 3334: 3312: 3298: 3283: 3248: 3233: 3189: 3174: 3159: 3143: 3121: 3106: 3092: 3044: 2996: 2898: 2860: 2784: 2762: 2747: 2732: 2695: 2685: 2668: 2580: 2545: 2524: 2490: 2468: 2450: 2435: 2412: 2384: 2342: 2265: 2251: 2228: 2209: 2165: 2133: 2115: 2100: 2080: 2062: 2003: 1948: 1890: 1876: 1861: 1839: 1825: 1810: 1779: 1724: 1685: 1667: 1632: 1610: 1590: 1568: 1553: 1527: 1508: 1485: 1470: 1448: 1390: 1364: 1350: 1335: 1291: 1252: 1207: 1189: 1174: 1120: 1105: 1096:

Yeah sorry I just can't help myself. The candidates never seem to mind. --

1088: 1069: 1053: 1029: 996: 981: 962: 938: 871: 825: 805: 783: 765: 747: 732: 709: 697: 682: 606: 587: 561: 547: 526: 504: 487: 456: 422: 392: 363: 349: 319: 304: 288: 269: 3567: 907:

Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes

233:

to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents

4449:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4352: 4260:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4153: 2974:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2838:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2320:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2181: 1796: 1707:

have now contended that there is a "Critical fault in proposal evidence"

1403: 1180:

Well earned recognition -- then and now, Mkat. Glad to have you back.

4427:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4388: 4238:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4199: 1970:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

1915:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

1378: 218:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made

4536: 470:, if I've inadvertently crossed a line feel free to revert. Regards, 3239:

Well done on your spirited defence of spam. Keep up the good work. --

4363:. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the 4164:. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the 3065:), neither of your earlier edit summaries reverting other editors ( 4609:. If you become active again please feel free to re-add yourself. 2634:, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: 4462:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 4273:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 597:

deserving (and I could think of many who would be deserving!) --

4452:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

4263:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

2977:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

2841:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

2323:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

4421:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

2509:, but if you think it's a legitimate risk, then discussion at 2403:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

624:

Hello, Mkativerata. Please check your email; you've got mail!

593:

Don't thank me at all -- I genuinely couldn't think of anyone

229:

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's

40: 15: 3777:

Here are some of the many sources you are reverting against.

2188:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

1410:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

467:

I think your oppose was in the wrong place, fixed it for now

4597: 4587: 4503: 4493: 4314: 4304: 2597: 2180: 1402: 1322:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1304: 1281:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1263: 1003:

Your vote at Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/MelanieN

617: 177: 3270:

notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at

245:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary 2656:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek 3022:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

1801:

Not sure if that qualifies as an inappropriate username.

1766:

so you get a whopping three cookies, fresh from the oven!

578:

Thank you for the very kind nomination, you made my day.

4232:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

51:

Am away for a while and only checking in intermittently.

4433: