User talk:Mkativerata/Archive16

3032:

false. Sachins statistics speaks for itself, in that regard). Whereas, when I make a statement based on statistics(which are the facts) I am said to be self sourcing, ie. basing it on my own opinion. The stats are the facts, the only real truth. Everything else are just opinions. I would really like to believe that Knowledge (XXG) is not a forum where using references and citations based on other cricketers opinions(cricketers whose own opinions may be influenced by a particular like or dislike of a certain individual) carry more weight than references based on statistics(which are always cold, unbiased and irrefutable). I don't think it is that far fetched for anyone to consider the possibility that, according to the statistics, Jacques Kallis could be one of the greatest batsmen of all time; especially in light of the fact that his stats are near Identical to Tendulkar's. Would you not agree with me on this?

3028:

weasel words. Firstly; that was not the case. Weasel words are used to make a statement that is not based on actual facts and statistics. Which is not what I did. I'll try to explain the best I can. Saying that something IS true, and saying that something can be CONSIDERED true is not essentially the same thing. When you say a girl is pretty, you claim, without a doubt that she is indeed pretty. When you say she can be considered to be pretty, you merely point out that she could be seen as pretty by some and not by others. And that is all I did in the "Jacques Kallis" article. I pointed out that; him being one of the best batsmen of all time; can be assumed... but is still open for debate.

805:(to Tarc) "You are a terrible liar. You and I both know that your only goal was to eliminate any discussion on this. ... You said WP:NOTCENSORED does not apply here, which is blatantly false - and your buddy Collect brainlessly backed you up on that - just because he hates me whenever I'm right. And you called the entire discussion "bullshit: and deleted it again and again, first saying it was NPOV and then UNDUE, and you attacked the references, and now, you still don't have the balls to own up to the fact that your shifty, unmoving arguments were wrong and this was indeed a newsworthy and well-researched bit of information on Santorum. " (please note the juicy bits are all from SB23). 2989: 2818:? The previous user whom we dealt with has now been blocked. Judging by FamilyInstituteIntegrityUpholder's own edit history, he's likely to get blocked soon too. I'm interested in finding if these two are part of a network of POV users hired by political operatives. They might have several "sleeper" accounts which edit other articles as a smokescreen and then launch into action when the pages they're really targeting get semi-protected. I've already seen one similar network hired by Malaysia's ruling party before, and if this is the case here, they're getting smarter about it. — 2150: 3080:

Tendulkar, or even Bradman. One could argue that; if there is no discernible truth, then at least a standard, whether partially flawed or not, for the truth must be set. Statistics always provides me with that standard. Statistics, like opinions, may not tell you the whole story. But, at least statistics, unlike opinions at times, is never based on sentiment. However, my view on statistics does not change this situation one little bit. The fact is; "rules are rules", and I'll have to abide by them.

1540:. There are articles, videos, highlights of this player. On the newspapers in Belgium and in Indonesia, there are a lot of articles. And he is followed by more than 50.000 people on Twitter. Even if Twitter is not an official source, it means though that he is well known and that a lot of people are interested in his performances. Could I create a new page or could you make the previous one readable again and then I could fill it with updated news? Thanks again! 439: 2746: 833:

and he did so here, shutting him up in a much more effective way than a block or a "I'm a big man listen to me" admin warning; and (b) more importantly, despite all the venting, the article dispute is actually over. So if I were to block or warn Screwball, having looked at it after your prompting, it would justifiably be claimed that I was procured by you to do so. Sorry I know that's probably irritatingly unhelpful. --

1019: 1924: 3144: 1807:. The opening description and size & descripton of the venue / Entertainment section / Dickens Memorial section / Commemorative Medal section were mostly researced from the actual exhibition catalogue which was published well over 100 years ago. Can you please reinstate the texts from these sections, which were not in dispute? 789:(to Tarc) "You are over-complicating and warring because you believe adding facts = political smearing. That my friend, is not right, and it is a blatant abuse of wikipedia. I ask that you discontinue your editwarring on this because you are too emotionally invested to allow a fair exchange of information right now." 3027:

Hi, Mkativerata. I realize that you are a longstanding, and I'm sure respected, contributor to Knowledge (XXG), and the last thing I want to do is to rattle any cages... considering this was the first edit that I have done. However, I see that you have once again changed my edit. Stating that I used

2236:

article, but it was inappropriate. Tags are left on articles to draw attention to the fact that specific work needs to be done on them. They shouldn't just be removed because they are 'ugly'. I reverted the edit, let's wait until the article has a proper lead section before we remove the tag. Cheers.

1846:

Another major attraction at the Earls Court arena was Captain Paul Boyton's water chute which was constructed in 1899. The Captain flooded the arena in 1893 and built the 70ft high chute backing on to Lillie Road at today's West Brompton entrance. The ride was considered to be the biggest ride of its

1831:

Another major attraction at the VEE Earls Court arena, was Captain Paul Boyton's water chute which was completed in 1899. The Captain flooded the arena in 1893 and built the 70 ft high chute backing on to Lillie Road at today's West Brompton entrance. The ride was considered to be the biggest ride of

3031:

What is strange to me is that in Sachin Tendulkars' article they make actual claims; yet it goes over-looked. These claims (according to the references used)are based on opinions; albeit those of certain cricketers... but it still remains opinions(Don't get me wrong; I am not saying these claims are

2558:

Seriously? Most people get that it's a support. Only a couple of people have missed the sarcasm and your pointing it out ruins the humor. It's ok for folks to make jokes on Knowledge (XXG). If Mkativerata has declined to "clarify", you shouldn't either. It's such an obvious joke had you checked

642:

Thank you for your support at my recent successful RFA and for your support in the past. Being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others

387:

I didn't manage to put a proper close in as requested because my life has been remarkably busy, and I didn't exactly have a lot of time as of late to place myself down in front of the computer and write one. I wholeheartedly - and seriously - apologize for not doing so, but you're welcome to beat up

2843:

I doubt a checkuser will get accepted for this, probably because an admin at SPI will just block on the contribs evidence alone. I'm going to block myself right now, simply because of the edit-warring over that beauty pageant. It might be worth seeing if there are any more accounts before trying to

1562:

newspapers about him, but it is belgian press. But I am happy to see how the rules are strict, as I use myself a lot Knowledge (XXG) to search informations about a lot of things. There are some articles of him in the belgian press (in French then). There are also several video broadcasts of him on

921:

It's not just the technical matter of copyright violations we have to worry about, it's plagiarism. Copying a half-sentence, even with attribution by citation, is not ok even if it wouldn't break the law. And in this case, it wasn't an isolated half-sentence, it was multiple half and full sentences

832:

I think this would need to go to a noticeboard if action is to be taken. I don't think I'm in a position to take action myself. That's because I had seen the exchange from my watchlist before you posted here and I chose not to do anything, largely because (a) I know Tarc can give as good as he gets

694:

Thanks. Coming off a block and diving straight into old battles is, as I'm sure you know, usually a swift way to a much longer block, 3RR or not. Happy for you to link to this as essentially a warning. I'll put Rick on my watchlist. I don't normally take administrative action (especially blocks) in

69:

Sure. I've just restored the history. I was thinking of userfying it but upon review the the article was so short the chance of it being a copyvio is pretty low so I think the history can remain. As you can see, the stub was converted into a redirect in 2009 and then (quite unthinkingly) deleted by

2490:

state that you were supporting the RfA. So I decided to be bold and strike the vote, and let you know what I had done. That, I believe you will find, is acceptable. The alternative was for me to change the wording of your !vote, and that is unacceptable on so many levels. The reason I gave was

881:

I have been thinking about how we can improve AFD for a while and I do think that getting direct feedback on what arguments counted and what didn't weill help users understand how to make their votes count more. A nice side outcome is that we will all tend to react to how other admins act and this

747:

Sorry, had I been online 7 hours ago I might have done something. But since then it seems (and I haven't looked at it in detail as I'm very short on time now) that the edit-war has stopped and it's being hashed out on the talk page. If I'm wrong on this (may well be, haven't had much time), please

403:

Thank you for the explanation. My message to you was on 22 November 2011, nine days ago. It is fine if you did not have the time then to provide a closing rationale. I expected you to reply on your talk page that you would do so when you had more time. Your lack of response to my request indicated

3055:

a place where "where using references and citations based on other cricketers opinions(cricketers whose own opinions may be influenced by a particular like or dislike of a certain individual) carry more weight than references based on statistics(which are always cold, unbiased and irrefutable)."

1113:

where the general consensus was that instead of not linking any countries, we would link countries that were directly relevant to the blurb. In other words, we would like countries whose omission would render the blurb incomprehensible. That means almost all countries used as adjectives (e.g. in

371:

A rationale is better than none because editors can at least know that the closing admin didn't just count the votes. I agree though that miswording a closing rationale can be a recipe for calls of a supervote. Having reviewed your close, I believe it is well-worded to avoid controversy and is a

3079:

Hi there. I just want to thank you for your prompt reply. I have gone though the "verifiability, not truth" policy, and I understand the guidelines more clearly now. And I agree with you; stats do lie. But the same variables you mentioned could apply to any other batsman; whether it be Kallis,

53:

from scratch. I would like to see if the prior article has usable material that I could reuse for the rewritten article, while being mindful of copyright issues. Can you userfy that article (without destroying the new article, of course) to my userspace so I can examine it and reuse/rewrite

1561:

Hello dear, Twitter is of course not a reliable source, but it was just to tell you that he is popular. I am executive secretary in the club he is playing in. So the sources are reliable. Everything that is in the site is information that he gave to us. There are also a lot of articles in

2106:

Thanks for that as well! You may have read (on my talk) that I made the two op 27/2 my new year's resolution. I was ready to mention in the discussion the (true) story of a girl who had been nicknamed Fatty from the day she was born to when that name almost entered her high school diploma.

2296:

Just noticed that you're an admin. Strange that you don't understand the point of article tags. Unfortunately I can't revert your incorrect edit any more as I'll be violating 3RR, but it's very strange that you should arrive on another editor's radar in this manner when you're an admin.

1232:

I've just locked the article down. Sorry I know this means you can't edit it either. But the block/sock cycle isn't going to work and it shouldn't be the kind of article that needs to be updated/corrected often. I've set it at six months but hopefully it can be lifted well before then.

2460:

who asked you at the start of the thread, and minutes after you replied to me, the nominator queried your oppose vote. I would argue that your vote is confusing, and I would expect is likely to get a lot more queries/reversions/moved into the oppose section.

733:"I can't believe Collect has been on wikipedia this many years and still gets away with abusing and misreading the BLP policies ; it's sad really". 3RR in a matter of 43 minutes! 4RR in 17 hours. Seems that your attention is needed for sure. Thanks. 1287:

It seems to me this account is one in a long line of accounts associated with (if not socks of) Defterios and it's going to persist. But if you'd like me to unprotect, please just say so: obviously protection should help good editors (you) not hinder them.

2941:

For disclosure I'm pretty angry about something the user in question has done at the moment. Barring being specifically asked to comment further on that issue, after this post I'll step away from anything related to ITN or this user for at least a day.

799:" I would ask Collect and Tarc to stop being bitter losers and apologize for having me blocked - because they could not accept a productive discussion. I don't expect either of them to have the balls to do the right thing, which is a simple "I'm sorry". " 1890:

Sorry I'm not going to restore anything as I'm not confident that anything I restore other than the categories, images, etc isn't a copyright violation. If you have public domain sources that aren't copyrighted, just re-use them for a new clean article.

961:

I am the idiot who listed you there. I am sorry. You must be quite upset at me. Looking at it again, I don’t understand myself why I mistook you for a bad faith editor. I’ll try to pay better attention before dishing out false accusations again.

3050:

Hi there. For any claim on wikipedia, a source is usually needed. If you could find a reputable journalist/commentator or three saying Kallis "can be considered" one of the best batsmen in the world, that's really all you need. I'm afraid this

723:

He is at it in full force and vigor (4RR in 17 hurs) - and his edit summary of "(untrue; the information is sourced; there are 2 refs there - and either way, it is against protocol to just delete info when a simple citation needed will do"

2017: 2006: 1821:

Before I deleted the article I checked samples of it. The Corbould section that is most certainly not the only part of the article that contains copyright violations. The Martin Couney section contains extensive copying from

171:

Thanks - I think removing them is a good idea for now. I'm not at all confident we could get all of them right. And thanks for picking up on the much bigger issue in the first place: that we had the PM appointing them all!

84:

Thanks. Other than details on rooms and fireplaces in his home, it doesn't have much that I didn't already cover... and no references. I think I'll just leave the one I wrote as-is. Thanks for your effort, nonetheless.

1487:

Hello Mkativerata, I would like to know for witch reason you deleated the page af Syamsir Alam. I would like to create a new page and add more information. Is it possible? Thanks in advance for your answer. Regards,

137:

There, I removed the 'monarchs' from the Chief Justice infoboxes & the 'monarchs' & 'governors-general' from infoboxes. When you've figured out all the GGs for them, then put'em in - not just a tiny few.

1669:. You'll just need to demonstrate that the picture can be used by wikipedia without being subject to copyright restrictions. Speaking of copyright restrictions, I saw that you added text to the article from 2426:

your oppose vote in the support section as it is confusing. Could you please move your vote to the oppose section if you are opposing him, or make it clearer that you are actually supporting him? Thanks.

2953:. I was wondering whether with the benefit of hindsight you would take the comment back, or whether you feel there are grounds to regard the user as having a "cowboy" or "rogue" attitude to the tools? — 341:

Thanks -- you'll see I stuck the boot in in the Wentworth DRV myself. Of course, the irony is that when you give an explanation, it gives editors something to pick at :) Still, better than nothing. --

2472:

So you boldly struck my !vote, probably contrary to some guideline somewhere, and only after it was unstruck did you research the page history, which would have given you the answer to begin with. --

1876:

OK then, excluding these stated violations, can you please just reinstate the opening description and size & descripton of the venue / Dickens Memorial section / Commemorative Medal section.

2603:

pathetic comment too. I got it straight away and its not the first time this device has been used in an RFA. You need to go find a sense of humour somewhere and try not to be so pofaced...

1190: 899:

Repetition of technical descriptions of sub-sentence size is normal in scholarly writing and is not plagiarism if cited properly. Actually it is encouraged for precision, to prevent the

544:

All right, I figure the danger of having copyvios in the article's history (which is really not that great) is outweighed by the desirability of crediting all those who helped fix it. --

2964:

I made that comment after seeing two or three reversions of postings on T:ITN -- I wouldn't take the comment back but I wouldn't necessarily accept the comment as "current" either. --

2811: 2207: 2723:

Hi. When we have an applicant for clerk at the copyright problems, we're supposed to get together a couple of the folks who work there to review. :) Would you mind weighing in at

1383:

It's not clear to me what purpose this text is serving. It's not obviously a copyright violation, because the text is quoted, attributed, etc. The question is whether it violates

1401:(As a potential resource, I expect.) Hmm, it's been my understanding from past cases that copyvios can be present anywhere in WP; Talk pages are also CC-licensed, and note that 2203: 1118:

is debatable, but most would probably say the key point is that 400 people were killed by the storm (not necessarily 400 Filipinos were killed). So that can go unlinked. With,

1083: 1069: 2486:

Not quite - I did research the page history before I struck your vote, and all your other edits since then. At no time between casting your vote and replying to me did you

943: 278: 2375:

It is stupid to vandalise a succint and reasonably well-written article with a tag full of jargon and outrageously disproportionate to the "problem" it seeks to address. --

1966: 1547:

sources, such as newspaper articles, not club websites and Twitter feeds. If you could provide examples of such independent sources, I'd consider restoring the page. --

282: 195: 188: 3064:

lie -- averages can't be compared against each other without taking into account other variables: quality of opposition, batting-friendly 21st century pitches, etc. --

452: 2361:, or are you saying that putting it on this particular article (where the lead is too short) is stupid? What other content-related tags do you consider to be stupid? 2844:

connect it to a pro-BN setup. If this is a pro-BN setup, I don't think they're being very smart about it at all, just doing things that lead straight to blocks. --

619: 2905:

Just saw the previous section. I probably would have phrased this one a bit differently if I had browsed your talk page comments first. Same basic issue, though.

2881: 1387:

as "excessive". That it's done on a talk page also makes it less likely to be a problem, although it's just not clear to me why the quotes have been put there. --

1786: 817:

violations, he persists in attacking others who do not back him up, and even insists Tarc and I are somehow in cahoots! Please give him a gallon of tea or so.

3001:

Thank you for your contributions on English Knowledge (XXG) that have helped improve Australian related content. :D It is very much appreciated. :D Enjoy your

2403: 1648:

I have added some informations. I hope this is ok. Thank you for restoring the page. Could you please help me and send me a link of how to pur a picture?

369:) made two comments at the DRV, neither of which explained his close. His continued refusal to provide a closing rationale is disrespectful to the community. 2687:

I researched the candidate's history quite extensively. As can be seen from the !vote. I picked the very first edit he ever made. So yes, it's sarcastic. --

1736: 1459:(our policy, stricter than copyright law). It is certainly not the kind of blatant copyright violation that would justify revision-deleting the material. -- 2724: 2805: 1595:

kind of article, in a prominent newspaper, looks good. I'll restore the article when I have some time to work on it in about 12 hours, if that's ok. --

1087: 1062: 1673:. CS Vise's website is subject to copyright so we can't copy text from it. There are a lot of useful facts there so we should try to summarise it. -- 1077: 2615:). It'll be tough because your username really doesn't ring any bells with me, but if I need any help don't hesitate to come on over here again. -- 2612:

Thanks for the gratutious feedback, Axl. I'll be sure, from this day forward to think "What would Axl do?" before making any edit on wikipedia (eg

1110: 3124:

on administrator User:Fæ. You are being notified due to your prior participation in ANI, RfA, or RfC discussions regarding this user. Thank you,

1726: 1046:

Thanks Dianna, it was a pleasure to have the opportunity to review this one. Thanks for all your hard work improving such an important article. --

730:

with the summary of " Linkrot, time article doesn't verify, and your edit summary (for first edit) certainly doesn't explain anything", and then

3121: 3114: 2186:

with the disclaimer that my thanks doesn't mean I necessarily agreed with the side of the debate that prevailed -- I have no view on the matter.

1455:

To be honest, probably not. This is in low risk territory. It is almost certainly not a breach of copyright law; at the most, it is a breach of

1099: 1722: 2801: 1732: 2266:

No. We don't judge articles by how good they look I'm afraid. Content is key, and the content of this article isn't up to scratch just yet.

324: 2815: 1630:

Not a problem. I've created a new article rather than restored the old article as the old article is now out of date. The new article is

3161:

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that

1616: 1495: 1318:

The protection is fine. I'll submit changes through edit requests. This way makes it fairer as it would have to be filtered by admins. —

1073: 213: 39: 853:... for being the first to support my mad scheme to make sure that AFD doesn't collapse under the pressure of falling participation... 372:

valid assessment of the AfD. However, I will avoid participating in the DRV owing to the voluminous outside attention it has received.

2875: 2452:

Looking back at the history page, I can see three instances of confusion - when you initially posted the vote; when someone commented

516:

Can you move all history of changes automatically, instead of copy paste? There were many people who worked on salvaging the draft --

488:

Thanks. I've just had a quick look and I think I need a bit of a deeper look, which I might not have time to do for a day or so. --

388:

on me as much as you'd like for this error. Since I'm lazy and a jerk and everything, I'll just quit wasting everyone's time here.

530:

Hmm... that would involve moving a history with copyvios into the mainspace. It might be ok in this case, but I'll think on it. --

2041: 1536:

Thank you for your quick answer. Now, there are reliable sources. You could have a look on the internet site www.cs-vise.be or

1088:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard#Richard Arthur Norton: Revisiting topic ban; Should it be removed or made indefinite?

1063:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard#Richard Arthur Norton: Revisiting topic ban; Should it be removed or made indefinite?

227: 2409:

Your oppose is in the support section; not 100% sure if that was intended, it being the internet where humour is misconstrued.

1186: 2163: 1160: 1729:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1357: 904: 2832: 2058: 1985:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

1332: 1277: 1210: 695:

response to requests on my talk page so watchlisting it will allow me to act on my own volition, at least when I'm online. --

310: 1510:

Hi there. The article has been deleted a few different times. The first time it was deleted it was because Syamsir was not

2871: 1182: 1178: 606: 1930: 2438:

I thought it was quite clear I was supporting him, but I've restored my !vote (for the second time) to make it clear. --

667:

As soon as he was unblocked for disruptive editing - he was at it again, making clearly improperly sourced claims about

864: 474:

The article is ready for main space. Please move/transfer the work history on the draft as well, if possible. Thanks!--

2988: 2366: 2334: 2302: 2271: 2242: 2012:

In the course of an ongoing case, the Arbitration Committee has decided to collect all relevant information regarding

1766:

Hi, as stated in my user-page, I have been too busy lately to work on any Wiki stuff. So can you now please un-delete

241: 3162: 2512:

Even now, as I type this, I have not seen you state that you are supporting the candidate anywhere but on this page.

867:

encouraging appropriately detailed closing rationales but never got round to it. So I'm right on board with this. --

1986: 1972: 1767: 50: 35: 1086:). The closing admin has asked for community input about whether to remove the topic ban or make it indefinite at 3190: 2028: 652: 395: 366: 296: 1995: 1061: 2325:

A lead section of greater length would make the article much better to read, and is much more likely to happen

1785:

I'm afraid I can't userfy the article because of the copyright violations it contained. Instead, I have placed

618:

I deleted it because five editors unanimously agreed to the deletion over the course of a seven-day discussion

318: 1592: 3035:

I hope we can reach an agreement on this matter, and would really appreciate any positive response from you.

2166:, from a biased nickname to a factual name! The move was predicted to be impossible, you made it possible. -- 907:

is not policy but just an essay with problems, but even then you are ignoring the legal background that only

3088: 3040: 1620: 1499: 207: 153: 1612: 1491: 1263:

have not been active because it's glaringly obvious who they are and other sockpuppets have been blocked. —

594: 3265: 3239: 2910: 2895: 2362: 2330: 2311:

It's an admin's job to make things better for readers. Keep that in mind given that you want to be one. --

2298: 2267: 2238: 2215: 2171: 2112: 2078: 1923: 3010: 1515: 3214: 3103: 3069: 2969: 2924: 2849: 2785: 2706: 2692: 2677: 2620: 2477: 2443: 2380: 2348: 2316: 2285: 2257: 2193: 2126: 2097: 2013: 1935: 1896: 1855: 1804: 1794: 1678: 1639: 1600: 1574: 1552: 1527: 1464: 1432: 1392: 1368:

today (23 December). I think all those additions need to be expunged rather than just reverted; thanks.

1293: 1238: 1223: 1144: 1051: 995: 981: 967: 927: 872: 838: 753: 700: 627: 549: 535: 493: 346: 264: 203: 177: 127: 75: 17: 2149: 1982: 1255:

Wait, but there's currently only one editor who is adding unsourced info to the article. The other two

1193:

sniffed out some COI users who edited the Defterios page, though none of them were related to Ga8thds.

2919:

Seems he's already been nailed. I'd have nailed him too just looking at the username and the edits. --

2280:

Wrong. The article is ok. The tag kills the article unnecessarily. How off-putting for our readers. --

1260: 643:

before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. Best,

3184: 2954: 2023: 1881: 1812: 1775: 1653: 1514:. Before creating a new article, it might be worth (a) checking whether he meets the requirements of 645: 221: 3006: 3129: 2728: 2020:. Since you either blocked or unblocked Malleus Fatuorum, you are welcome to comment, if you wish. 951: 314: 1168: 598: 3084: 3036: 2828: 2549: 2514: 2463: 2429: 2054: 1586: 1563: 1427:

is the legitimacy of the purpose the quote serves. Being on talk page it's very hard to judge! --

1328: 1273: 1256: 1218:

Thanks for letting me know, and sorry I haven't been paying close attention to it. I will now! --

1206: 1091: 1070:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Archive228#Richard Arthur Norton copyright violations

770: 407: 373: 328: 304: 245: 1670: 1649: 1583: 882:

will pull closing standards closer together and reduce the amount of inconsistency - hopefully!

46:; and then, when that article was deleted for copyright reasons, the redirect was deleted, too. 1072:, in which a one-month topic ban on creating new articles and making page moves was imposed on 3270: 3260: 3244: 3234: 2906: 2891: 2763: 2413: 2211: 2167: 2108: 2074: 1752: 1172: 1033: 822: 738: 714: 684: 602: 563: 521: 507: 479: 464: 273:

Okay. Thank you for providing a detailed rationale for your close. I dislike when some admins

161: 143: 112: 2777: 2547:

about your vote so as not to waste anyone else's time with trying to work out how you voted.

1405:

refers to "pages" rather than "articles". In any case, some of these additions aren't brief (

3210: 3154:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under the 3099: 3065: 2965: 2950: 2920: 2845: 2781: 2702: 2688: 2673: 2616: 2563: 2473: 2439: 2376: 2344: 2312: 2281: 2253: 2189: 2122: 2093: 1960: 1892: 1851: 1790: 1674: 1635: 1596: 1570: 1548: 1523: 1460: 1428: 1388: 1289: 1234: 1219: 1140: 1124: 1095: 1047: 991: 977: 963: 923: 900: 868: 834: 749: 696: 661: 623: 545: 531: 489: 445: 438: 411: 377: 342: 332: 260: 259:

Thanks Cunard. I had seen this one but just didn't feel I had anything worthwhile to say. --

249: 198:, which is due for closure in about 11 hours. I think any comments you might have about the 173: 123: 71: 43: 3155: 3057: 1456: 1424: 1384: 814: 793: 3171: 3151: 2745: 1955: 1942: 1877: 1808: 1771: 1446: 1414: 1373: 1115: 235: 217: 1591:

I haven't looked at that one out of fear what it would do to my computer machine :), but

1519: 1409:), and taken as a whole, ~50K of a book seems significant enough to be concerned about. 942:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

784:

where he asks "Why is Tarc being allowed to call well-researched information bullshit?",

3275: 3249: 3218: 3203: 3180: 3133: 3125: 3107: 3092: 3073: 3044: 3014: 2973: 2958: 2928: 2914: 2899: 2853: 2837: 2789: 2767: 2731: 2710: 2696: 2681: 2651: 2624: 2607: 2598: 2566: 2553: 2518: 2481: 2467: 2447: 2433: 2416: 2384: 2370: 2352: 2338: 2320: 2306: 2289: 2275: 2261: 2246: 2219: 2197: 2175: 2130: 2116: 2101: 2082: 2063: 2030: 1900: 1885: 1859: 1826:. Earlier sections of the article also contain copying. For example, your article said: 1816: 1798: 1779: 1756: 1714: 1682: 1659: 1643: 1624: 1604: 1578: 1556: 1531: 1503: 1468: 1450: 1436: 1418: 1396: 1377: 1337: 1297: 1282: 1242: 1227: 1164: 1148: 1133: 1055: 1037: 999: 985: 971: 955: 947: 931: 915: 886: 876: 857: 842: 826: 757: 742: 718: 704: 688: 655: 631: 610: 567: 553: 539: 525: 511: 497: 483: 468: 415: 398: 381: 350: 336: 268: 253: 181: 165: 147: 131: 116: 94: 90: 79: 63: 59: 2672:

on MikeLynch's RfA. Are you being sarcastic? I'm a very stupid person. Please help. --

1566:(Indonesian sport shannel) . I really hope you will restore the page. Thanks a lot. 1511: 1423:

Absolutely, copyvios can occur on any page of the project. One relevant question with

1402: 1018: 976:

No worries. When I saw it I figured you'd just made an honest mistake somewhere. :) --

327:). There are too few admins such as yourself who are willing to explain their closes. 3002: 2820: 2596: 2046: 1743:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1718: 1320: 1265: 1198: 912: 668: 392: 360: 300: 290: 3183:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. – 299:) to provide a rationale. He has since edited and has ignored requests from myself, 107:

Why have you left some with GG as appointer & others with Monarch as appointer?

3098:

No worries, and I certainly see your point. I look forward to seeing you around! --

2759: 2604: 2457: 2410: 1950: 1748: 1744: 1631: 1029: 1025: 883: 854: 818: 734: 710: 680: 559: 517: 503: 475: 460: 157: 139: 108: 1365: 2016:'s block log and, as such, has created a table of all blocks, which can be found 1976: 2560: 1969:.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 2252:

The article looks better without the tag. That's the only relevant question. --

1789:

the shell of the article: the headings, references, images, categories, etc. --

2643: 2233: 2089: 2007:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility enforcement/Evidence/Blocks

1537: 1442: 1410: 1369: 231: 2559:

the candidate's contributions and noticed it was their first contrib.--v/r -

2329:

a tag. By your rationale we should remove all tags from the top of articles?

1803:

According to PBS and MER C, the only copyright violation in the article was

86: 55: 1823: 679:

from you prevent further disruptive and unsourced claims therein? Cheers.

946:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --

3209:

I suggest having another read of R3. Especially the first three words. --

2586: 389: 356: 286: 3229:

Please do not personally attack me in edit summaries or anywhere else -

3143: 1838: 406:

When you have the time, please provide a closing rationale for the AfD.

196:

Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review/Log/2011 November 24#Jessie Stricchiola

189:

Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review/Log/2011 November 24#Jessie Stricchiola

2980:

Happy Australia Day! Thank you for contributing to Australian content!

2633:, everybody. I, like everyone else, saw Mkativerata's comment and was 2454:

Errr, there is an Oppose section below. --07:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

1999: 1569:

If you could give me some links to these sources, that would help. --

1119: 283:

Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review/Log/2011 November 16#Aubrey Wentworth

42:

2232:

Hi there Mkativerata, I understand why you removed the tag from the

1770:, so that I can edit out its problems in a "my space" box. Ta Steve 590:

Hey jackass. Why did you delete the 'Grant Dunlop' wikipedia page?

70:

me as a redirect to nowhere when the target article got deleted. --

1441:

And you don't thus think it's best to err on the side of caution?

3165:

wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template

2629:

And so the mystery of the supporting opposer has been unraveled.

1543:

I'm afraid Twitter is not a reliable source. What you'll need is

1189:

on Ga8thds' talk page, and am waiting for his response. Also, a

1122:, however, the country is essential to conveying the story. -- 727:

seems to indicate true obstinacy now. And his prior revert at

1918: 3060:

explains the core position: "verifiability not truth". Stats

2637:

confused! I was just about proceed to ANI, but luckily I saw

2491:

because it was confusing and potentially skewing the counter.

675:

borne out by the cites furnished (just as before). Might a

3142: 2162:

for moving a great piece of music, Beethoven's second piano

2073:

Thank you for the move from a nickname to a factual name! --

1947:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 455:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

437: 2456:, and when I struck out your vote. On this page, there is 1666: 863:

Not a problem. I've always been meaning to write an essay

355:

I noticed your comment and agree that it is a lazy close.

3083:

Again, thanks for your feedback. It is much appreciated.

194:

Hi Mkativerata. It appears that you were not notified of

1522:(such as newspaper articles) that discuss his career. -- 1024:

Time to relax with a coffee after all your hard work on

792:

And the last straw indicating he has no clue as to what

3230: 3158:, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo. 2946: 2886: 2866: 2638: 2613: 2544: 2423: 2206:

with an unbiased view - is exactly what's appreciated,

1717:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1406: 1361: 803: 797: 787: 782: 777: 731: 728: 725: 274: 199: 32: 3179:

to the page and state your intention on the article's

1028:! Your efforts have helped embiggen the wiki. Cheers, 279:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Aubrey Wentworth

2725:

Wikipedia_talk:Copyright_problems/Clerks#Voceditenore

2585:

Confusing and unhelpful. Pathetic attempt at humour.

944:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

2641:, which provided a much-needed clarification. Phew! 2357:

Do you mean that the "lead too short" tag is stupid

1965:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

1609:Great! Thank you very mutch! And happy new year! 451:

Message added 23:45, 2 December 2011 (UTC). You can

122:

I've only done a few - a bit short of time today. --

779:where he calls editors who follow WP:BLP "losers", 1967:Template:Did you know nominations/Dhammika Prasad 459:about bringing back the draft in the main space 2404:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/MikeLynch 103:Australian Chief Justices & Puisine Justices 38:was speedily deleted; presumably as part of the 2800:Should I file a sockpuppet investigation rgd. 1366:added copyrighted text to a couple dozen pages 444:Hello, Mkativerata. You have new messages at 8: 911:close paraphrase is a copyright violation. 152:It seems you get the last laugh on me - see 2719:Copyright problems board: clerk application 244:) will be helpful to the DRV closer. Best, 3225:warning - personal attack in edit summary 1959:took the wicket of his favourite player, 1939:was updated with a fact from the article 1665:The best place to upload a picture is at 1518:, and (b) checking whether there are any 1832:its kind on either side of the Atlantic. 3115:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Fæ 2995:Australian Wikimedian Recognition (AWR) 2758:in re: RfA; Well, I got it at least. 2121:No I didn't see that -- Good luck!! -- 1841:(an extract of a book from 2003) says: 1185:onto the article since November. I've 1163:about suspicious editing on behalf of 1360:, so please help with this issue: I 769:I think you might profitably gaze at 671:and Opus Dei - which were absolutely 7: 3005:and please continue your good work! 1847:kind on either side of the Atlantic. 1356:Hi, you've recently been working on 1068:Hi Mkativerata. You participated in 40:User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 2701:Oh, okay, thank you. Cheers, : ) -- 1191:sockpuppet investivgation in August 1114:French president) can be delinked. 748:don't hesitate to report to AN3. -- 2088:Closing that reminded me to watch 1364:, then noticed that the same user 1358:Knowledge (XXG):Copyright problems 1187:documented the suspicious activity 54:material as appropriate? Thanks. 24: 990:Great, thanks. Have a nice week! 2987: 2802:FamilyInstituteIntegrityUpholder 2744: 2148: 1922: 1709:Disambiguation link notification 1585:here is the interview of him on 1017: 2778:going straight to the pool room 2069:Piano Sonata No. 14 (Beethoven) 1139:Yes I did miss that, thanks. -- 285:. As a neutral editor, I asked 2002:) 16:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC) 1074:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 1: 1768:Victorian Era Exhibition 1897 1762:Victorian Era Exhibition 1897 1713:Hi. When you recently edited 1644:19:23, 30 December 2011 (UTC) 1625:09:51, 30 December 2011 (UTC) 1605:09:37, 30 December 2011 (UTC) 1579:08:59, 30 December 2011 (UTC) 1557:18:53, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 1532:19:13, 28 December 2011 (UTC) 1504:13:09, 28 December 2011 (UTC) 1469:19:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 1451:19:45, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 1437:18:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 1419:13:08, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 1397:07:26, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 1378:02:43, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 1338:08:37, 23 December 2011 (UTC) 1298:09:20, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 1283:08:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 1243:07:50, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 1228:19:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 1167:? Well it seems another user 1149:01:27, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 1134:23:18, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 1100:08:48, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 1056:07:31, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 1038:06:26, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 1000:21:06, 12 December 2011 (UTC) 986:19:12, 12 December 2011 (UTC) 972:16:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC) 956:10:14, 12 December 2011 (UTC) 932:08:58, 10 December 2011 (UTC) 916:08:11, 10 December 2011 (UTC) 632:07:51, 13 December 2011 (UTC) 611:00:57, 13 December 2011 (UTC) 568:05:20, 19 December 2011 (UTC) 554:19:22, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 540:01:28, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 526:23:26, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 512:20:10, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 498:19:35, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 484:16:34, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 216:) and the source analysis by 64:21:28, 30 November 2011 (UTC) 3276:21:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 3255:3RR earning - on Vinay Kumar 3250:21:19, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 3219:07:53, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 3204:06:58, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 3156:criteria for speedy deletion 3134:19:37, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 3108:10:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 3093:10:02, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 3074:09:17, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 3045:09:12, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 3015:07:43, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 2974:07:53, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 2959:07:24, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 2929:06:36, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 2915:01:22, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 2900:01:19, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 2854:18:48, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 2838:16:32, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 2790:20:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 2768:19:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 2732:12:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 2711:18:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2697:18:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2682:18:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2668:I'm just confued about your 2652:03:37, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 2625:01:35, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 2608:16:57, 19 January 2012 (UTC) 2599:16:52, 19 January 2012 (UTC) 2567:14:02, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 2554:20:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2519:20:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2482:20:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2468:20:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2448:18:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2434:15:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2417:01:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2385:02:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2371:01:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2353:01:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2339:01:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2321:01:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2307:01:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2290:01:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2276:00:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2262:00:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2247:00:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 2220:21:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 2198:07:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 2176:07:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 2131:07:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 2117:07:01, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 2102:06:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 2083:06:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 2064:06:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 1105:Wikilinking countries in ITN 887:19:44, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 877:19:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 858:19:25, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 843:19:13, 8 December 2011 (UTC) 827:13:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC) 758:08:43, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 743:02:22, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 719:20:24, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 705:19:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 689:13:10, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 656:21:03, 4 December 2011 (UTC) 469:23:45, 2 December 2011 (UTC) 416:17:33, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 399:12:21, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 382:10:00, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 351:09:52, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 337:09:49, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 277:. I participated in neither 269:09:38, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 254:09:37, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 182:08:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC) 166:08:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC) 148:07:45, 3 December 2011 (UTC) 132:08:51, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 117:08:43, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 95:15:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 80:06:37, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 2949:at WP:ITNC, in relation to 2945:About a month ago you made 2870:, could you take a look at 2040:You might want to weigh in 2036:Anwar Ibrahim sodomy trials 2031:14:01, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 1901:22:10, 1 January 2012 (UTC) 1886:22:09, 1 January 2012 (UTC) 1860:21:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC) 1817:21:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC) 1799:19:23, 1 January 2012 (UTC) 1780:13:18, 1 January 2012 (UTC) 1757:10:58, 1 January 2012 (UTC) 1683:19:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC) 1660:10:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC) 1196:Just keeping you updated. — 3291: 2864:As the blocking admin for 2752:The Barnstar of Good Humor 1183:pad poorly sourced puffery 404:that you were ignoring it. 51:Francis Harrington Glidden 36:Francis Harrington Glidden 27:Francis Harrington Glidden 3150:A tag has been placed on 2986: 2743: 2164:sonata quasi una fantasia 2147: 1949:... that on his debut in 1403:WP:C#Copyright violations 3259:{{3RR|Vinay Kumar}} - 2872:FascismDoctrineRespecter 1362:reverted a COPYVIO issue 1010:A cup of coffee for you! 809:In short he is not only 3120:A request for comments 2343:No, only stupid ones.-- 1987:Did you know? talk page 1915:DYK for Dhammika Prasad 154:Chief Justice of Canada 3147: 1849: 1834: 802:Oh -- for lagniappe: 442: 3146: 1844: 1829: 1805:Edward Henry Corbould 905:WP:Close paraphrasing 441: 18:User talk:Mkativerata 2204:looking at the facts 1953:, Sri Lankan bowler 1745:opt-out instructions 922:cobbled together. -- 865:WP:Show your working 2776:Thank you! This is 2737:A barnstar for you! 1727:fix with Dab solver 1181:) has popped up to 1159:Hey, remember when 1109:I think you missed 903:phenomenon. Also, 49:Yesterday, I wrote 3148: 1735:• Join us at the 1587:TV ONE (Indonesia) 1564:TV ONE (Indonesia) 1352:Bulk COPYVIO issue 771:Talk:Rick Santorum 453:remove this notice 443: 313:), and DRV closer 200:post-close comment 3197: 3020: 3019: 2836: 2773: 2772: 2363:Dylanfromthenorth 2331:Dylanfromthenorth 2299:Dylanfromthenorth 2268:Dylanfromthenorth 2239:Dylanfromthenorth 2187: 2181: 2180: 2062: 1993: 1992: 1980: 1740: 1667:Wikimedia Commons 1615:comment added by 1494:comment added by 1336: 1281: 1214: 1043: 1042: 614: 597:comment added by 3282: 3273: 3268: 3263: 3247: 3242: 3237: 3200: 3195: 3187: 3177: 3176: 3170: 2991: 2984: 2983: 2951:User:Tariqabjotu 2889: 2884:), particularly 2869: 2826: 2823: 2748: 2741: 2740: 2648: 2647: 2595: 2591: 2185: 2152: 2145: 2144: 2052: 2049: 2027: 2014:Malleus Fatuorum 1970: 1961:Sachin Tendulkar 1926: 1919: 1730: 1723:check to confirm 1662: 1627: 1520:reliable sources 1506: 1326: 1323: 1271: 1268: 1261:User:Jkdefterios 1204: 1201: 1130: 1127: 1021: 1014: 1013: 901:Chinese whispers 895:close paraphrase 662:User:Screwball23 648: 613: 591: 456: 446:Talk:Roman Dacia 44:Glidden (paints) 31:Hi. I see from 3290: 3289: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3271: 3266: 3261: 3257: 3245: 3240: 3235: 3227: 3191: 3185: 3174: 3168: 3167: 3141: 3139:Speedy deletion 3122:has been opened 3118: 3025: 2982: 2939: 2885: 2865: 2862: 2821: 2798: 2739: 2721: 2666: 2645: 2644: 2593: 2587: 2407: 2230: 2156:Flowers for you 2143: 2071: 2047: 2038: 2021: 2010: 1996:The DYK project 1956:Dhammika Prasad 1943:Dhammika Prasad 1917: 1764: 1737:DPL WikiProject 1711: 1657: 1610: 1489: 1485: 1354: 1321: 1266: 1199: 1157: 1128: 1125: 1116:The Philippines 1107: 1066: 1012: 940: 897: 851: 665: 646: 640: 592: 588: 457: 450: 435: 192: 105: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3288: 3286: 3256: 3253: 3226: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3163:administrators 3140: 3137: 3117: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3077: 3076: 3024: 3023:Jacques Kallis 3021: 3018: 3017: 2998: 2997: 2992: 2981: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2938: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2861: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2797: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2771: 2770: 2755: 2754: 2749: 2738: 2735: 2729:Moonriddengirl 2720: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2665: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2406: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2229: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2179: 2178: 2159: 2158: 2153: 2142: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2070: 2067: 2037: 2034: 2009: 2004: 1991: 1990: 1981:and add it to 1931:8 January 2012 1927: 1916: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1842: 1835: 1827: 1763: 1760: 1715:Thisara Perera 1710: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1484: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1353: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1165:John Defterios 1156: 1155:John Defterios 1153: 1152: 1151: 1111:the discussion 1106: 1103: 1065: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1041: 1040: 1022: 1011: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 939: 936: 935: 934: 896: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 850: 847: 846: 845: 807: 806: 800: 790: 785: 780: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 677:verbum sapiens 664: 659: 639: 636: 635: 634: 587: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 449: 436: 434: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 315:King of Hearts 191: 186: 185: 184: 135: 134: 104: 101: 100: 99: 98: 97: 34:that the page 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3287: 3278: 3277: 3274: 3269: 3264: 3254: 3252: 3251: 3248: 3243: 3238: 3232: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3201: 3199: 3198: 3188: 3182: 3178: 3173: 3164: 3159: 3157: 3153: 3145: 3138: 3136: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3116: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3085:Kenneth Grant 3081: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3059: 3054: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3037:Kenneth Grant 3033: 3029: 3022: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3003:Australia Day 3000: 2999: 2996: 2993: 2990: 2985: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2943: 2936: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2907:Fat&Happy 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2892:Fat&Happy 2888: 2883: 2880: 2877: 2873: 2868: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2835: 2834: 2830: 2825: 2824: 2817: 2813: 2810: 2807: 2803: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2774: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2756: 2753: 2750: 2747: 2742: 2736: 2734: 2733: 2730: 2726: 2718: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2663: 2653: 2650: 2649: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2606: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2597: 2592: 2590: 2584: 2583: 2568: 2565: 2562: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2552: 2551: 2546: 2545:clarification 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2520: 2517: 2516: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2489: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2466: 2465: 2459: 2455: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2432: 2431: 2425: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2415: 2412: 2405: 2402: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2235: 2227: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2183: 2182: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2160: 2157: 2154: 2151: 2146: 2140: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2068: 2066: 2065: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2051: 2050: 2043: 2035: 2033: 2032: 2029: 2026: 2025: 2019: 2015: 2008: 2005: 2003: 2001: 1997: 1988: 1984: 1978: 1974: 1968: 1964: 1962: 1958: 1957: 1952: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1938: 1937: 1936:Did you know? 1932: 1928: 1925: 1921: 1920: 1914: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1848: 1843: 1840: 1836: 1833: 1828: 1825: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1761: 1759: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1741: 1738: 1734: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1719:The Telegraph 1716: 1708: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1663: 1661: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1628: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1617:91.183.89.192 1614: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1584: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1567: 1565: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1541: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1496:91.183.89.192 1493: 1482: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1351: 1339: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1325: 1324: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1270: 1269: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1213: 1212: 1208: 1203: 1202: 1194: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1177: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1132: 1131: 1121: 1117: 1112: 1104: 1102: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1082: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1064: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1044: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1020: 1016: 1015: 1009: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 988: 987: 983: 979: 975: 974: 973: 969: 965: 960: 959: 958: 957: 953: 949: 945: 937: 933: 929: 925: 920: 919: 918: 917: 914: 910: 906: 902: 894: 888: 885: 880: 879: 878: 874: 870: 866: 862: 861: 860: 859: 856: 848: 844: 840: 836: 831: 830: 829: 828: 824: 820: 816: 812: 804: 801: 798: 795: 791: 788: 786: 783: 781: 778: 776: 775: 774: 772: 759: 755: 751: 746: 745: 744: 740: 736: 732: 729: 726: 722: 721: 720: 716: 712: 708: 707: 706: 702: 698: 693: 692: 691: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 669:Rick Santorum 663: 660: 658: 657: 654: 653: 650: 649: 638:RFA thank you 637: 633: 629: 625: 621: 617: 616: 615: 612: 608: 604: 600: 596: 585: 569: 565: 561: 557: 556: 555: 551: 547: 543: 542: 541: 537: 533: 529: 528: 527: 523: 519: 515: 514: 513: 509: 505: 501: 500: 499: 495: 491: 487: 486: 485: 481: 477: 473: 472: 471: 470: 466: 462: 454: 447: 440: 432: 418: 417: 413: 409: 402: 401: 400: 397: 394: 391: 386: 385: 384: 383: 379: 375: 368: 365: 362: 358: 354: 353: 352: 348: 344: 340: 339: 338: 334: 330: 326: 323: 320: 316: 312: 309: 306: 302: 298: 295: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 271: 270: 266: 262: 258: 257: 256: 255: 251: 247: 243: 240: 237: 233: 229: 226: 223: 219: 215: 212: 209: 205: 204:Dannysullivan 201: 197: 190: 187: 183: 179: 175: 170: 169: 168: 167: 163: 159: 155: 150: 149: 145: 141: 133: 129: 125: 121: 120: 119: 118: 114: 110: 102: 96: 92: 88: 83: 82: 81: 77: 73: 68: 67: 66: 65: 61: 57: 52: 47: 45: 41: 37: 33: 26: 19: 3258: 3228: 3193: 3192: 3166: 3160: 3149: 3119: 3082: 3078: 3061: 3052: 3034: 3030: 3026: 2994: 2944: 2940: 2937:Cowboy admin 2878: 2863: 2860:Blocked user 2827: 2819: 2814:) based on 2808: 2799: 2751: 2722: 2669: 2667: 2642: 2634: 2630: 2588: 2548: 2513: 2487: 2462: 2458:User:Stephen 2453: 2428: 2408: 2358: 2326: 2231: 2212:Gerda Arendt 2208:did you know 2168:Gerda Arendt 2155: 2109:Gerda Arendt 2075:Gerda Arendt 2072: 2053: 2045: 2039: 2022: 2011: 1994: 1954: 1951:Test cricket 1948: 1941: 1940: 1934: 1845: 1830: 1765: 1742: 1712: 1634:. Cheers. -- 1632:Syamsir Alam 1611:— Preceding 1544: 1516:WP:NFOOTBALL 1490:— Preceding 1486: 1483:Syamsir Alam 1355: 1327: 1319: 1272: 1264: 1205: 1197: 1195: 1175: 1158: 1123: 1108: 1080: 1067: 1026:Adolf Hitler 941: 908: 898: 852: 810: 808: 796:means yet: 768: 676: 672: 666: 651: 644: 641: 593:— Preceding 589: 586:Grant Dunlop 458: 405: 370: 363: 321: 307: 293: 238: 224: 210: 193: 151: 136: 106: 48: 30: 3211:Mkativerata 3100:Mkativerata 3066:Mkativerata 3058:This policy 2966:Mkativerata 2921:Mkativerata 2846:Mkativerata 2782:Mkativerata 2703:Rsrikanth05 2689:Mkativerata 2674:Rsrikanth05 2617:Mkativerata 2543:I've added 2474:Mkativerata 2440:Mkativerata 2377:Mkativerata 2345:Mkativerata 2313:Mkativerata 2282:Mkativerata 2254:Mkativerata 2190:Mkativerata 2123:Mkativerata 2094:Mkativerata 1977:quick check 1893:Mkativerata 1852:Mkativerata 1791:Mkativerata 1675:Mkativerata 1636:Mkativerata 1597:Mkativerata 1571:Mkativerata 1549:Mkativerata 1545:independent 1524:Mkativerata 1461:Mkativerata 1429:Mkativerata 1407:~4K of text 1389:Mkativerata 1290:Mkativerata 1257:User:JohnKD 1235:Mkativerata 1220:Mkativerata 1141:Mkativerata 1048:Mkativerata 992:Wikipeditor 978:Mkativerata 964:Wikipeditor 924:Mkativerata 909:substantial 869:Mkativerata 849:Thank you.. 835:Mkativerata 811:unrepentant 773:including 750:Mkativerata 697:Mkativerata 624:Mkativerata 546:Mkativerata 532:Mkativerata 490:Mkativerata 343:Mkativerata 261:Mkativerata 174:Mkativerata 124:Mkativerata 72:Mkativerata 2867:this block 2796:CheckUser? 2631:Great work 2488:explicitly 2424:struck out 2234:Steve Kean 2184:Thank you. 1973:here's how 1878:Stephen2nd 1809:Stephen2nd 1772:Stephen2nd 1747:. Thanks, 1161:I told you 938:ANI Notice 813:about his 558:Thanks!!-- 502:No rush.-- 218:S Marshall 3181:talk page 3126:MadmanBot 3007:LauraHale 2947:this edit 2887:this edit 2092:again! -- 1731:Read the 948:NellieBly 2882:contribs 2822:Yk Yk Yk 2812:contribs 2550:Stephen! 2515:Stephen! 2464:Stephen! 2430:Stephen! 2228:Jan 2012 2048:Yk Yk Yk 2000:nominate 1983:DYKSTATS 1613:unsigned 1492:unsigned 1322:Yk Yk Yk 1267:Yk Yk Yk 1200:Yk Yk Yk 1179:contribs 1084:contribs 709:Merci. 647:Schmidt, 607:contribs 595:unsigned 560:Codrin.B 518:Codrin.B 504:Codrin.B 476:Codrin.B 461:Codrin.B 433:Talkback 396:three... 367:contribs 325:contribs 311:contribs 301:Flatscan 297:contribs 242:contribs 228:contribs 214:contribs 2833:contrib 2760:Achowat 2605:Spartaz 2422:I have 2202:That - 2059:contrib 1749:DPL bot 1538:CS Visé 1512:notable 1333:contrib 1278:contrib 1211:contrib 1169:Ga8thds 884:Spartaz 855:Spartaz 819:Collect 735:Collect 711:Collect 681:Collect 599:Raelini 158:GoodDay 140:GoodDay 109:GoodDay 3267:really 3241:really 3172:hangon 2670:Oppose 2635:really 2359:per se 2024:Salvio 1839:source 1457:WP:NFC 1425:WP:NFC 1385:WP:NFC 1259:& 1129:abjotu 1120:Russia 1092:Cunard 1030:Dianna 815:WP:BLP 794:WP:BLP 408:Cunard 374:Cunard 329:Cunard 275:do not 246:Cunard 230:) and 3196:LIMAX 2646:Swarm 2141:Award 1837:This 1650:EWEUS 1443:Rostz 1411:Rostz 1370:Rostz 1126:tariq 232:Hobit 156:. -- 16:< 3233:- 3231:diff 3215:talk 3152:C;sd 3130:talk 3104:talk 3089:talk 3070:talk 3041:talk 3011:talk 2970:talk 2925:talk 2911:talk 2896:talk 2876:talk 2850:talk 2829:talk 2816:this 2806:talk 2786:talk 2780:. -- 2764:talk 2727:? -- 2707:talk 2693:talk 2678:talk 2639:this 2621:talk 2478:talk 2444:talk 2411:Step 2381:talk 2367:talk 2349:talk 2335:talk 2327:with 2317:talk 2303:talk 2286:talk 2272:talk 2258:talk 2243:talk 2216:talk 2210:? -- 2194:talk 2172:talk 2127:talk 2113:talk 2098:talk 2090:this 2079:talk 2055:talk 2042:here 2018:here 1897:talk 1882:talk 1856:talk 1824:here 1813:talk 1795:talk 1787:here 1776:talk 1753:talk 1679:talk 1671:here 1654:talk 1640:talk 1621:talk 1601:talk 1593:this 1575:talk 1553:talk 1528:talk 1500:talk 1465:talk 1447:talk 1433:talk 1415:talk 1393:talk 1374:talk 1329:talk 1294:talk 1274:talk 1239:talk 1224:talk 1207:talk 1173:talk 1145:talk 1096:talk 1078:talk 1052:talk 1034:talk 996:talk 982:talk 968:talk 952:talk 928:talk 913:Zero 873:talk 839:talk 823:talk 754:talk 739:talk 715:talk 701:talk 685:talk 628:talk 622:. -- 620:here 603:talk 564:talk 550:talk 536:talk 522:talk 508:talk 494:talk 480:talk 465:talk 412:talk 378:talk 361:talk 347:talk 333:talk 319:talk 305:talk 291:talk 281:nor 265:talk 250:talk 236:talk 222:talk 208:talk 178:talk 162:talk 144:talk 128:talk 113:talk 91:talk 87:TJRC 76:talk 60:talk 56:TJRC 3272:can 3262:You 3246:can 3236:You 3202:) 3186:PIE 2957:— 2955:WFC 2664:RfA 2589:Axl 2414:hen 2044:. — 1929:On 1733:FAQ 673:not 393:two 390:One 357:One 287:One 202:by 3217:) 3189:( 3175:}} 3169:{{ 3132:) 3106:) 3091:) 3072:) 3062:do 3053:is 3043:) 3013:) 2972:) 2927:) 2913:) 2898:) 2890:? 2852:) 2831:~ 2788:) 2766:) 2709:) 2695:) 2680:) 2623:) 2480:) 2446:) 2383:) 2369:) 2351:) 2337:) 2319:) 2305:) 2288:) 2274:) 2260:) 2245:) 2218:) 2196:) 2188:-- 2174:) 2129:) 2115:) 2107:-- 2100:) 2081:) 2057:~ 1975:, 1933:, 1899:) 1891:-- 1884:) 1858:) 1850:-- 1815:) 1797:) 1778:) 1755:) 1725:| 1681:) 1658:— 1656:) 1642:) 1623:) 1603:) 1577:) 1555:) 1530:) 1502:) 1467:) 1449:) 1435:) 1417:) 1395:) 1376:) 1331:~ 1296:) 1288:-- 1276:~ 1241:) 1233:-- 1226:) 1209:~ 1147:) 1098:) 1090:. 1054:) 1036:) 998:) 984:) 970:) 954:) 930:) 875:) 841:) 825:) 756:) 741:) 717:) 703:) 687:) 630:) 609:) 605:• 566:) 552:) 538:) 524:) 510:) 496:) 482:) 467:) 414:) 380:) 349:) 335:) 267:) 252:) 180:) 172:-- 164:) 146:) 130:) 115:) 93:) 78:) 62:) 3213:( 3194:C 3128:( 3102:( 3087:( 3068:( 3039:( 3009:( 2968:( 2923:( 2909:( 2894:( 2879:· 2874:( 2848:( 2809:· 2804:( 2784:( 2762:( 2705:( 2691:( 2676:( 2619:( 2594:¤ 2564:P 2561:T 2476:( 2442:( 2379:( 2365:( 2347:( 2333:( 2315:( 2301:( 2284:( 2270:( 2256:( 2241:( 2214:( 2192:( 2170:( 2125:( 2111:( 2096:( 2077:( 1998:( 1989:. 1979:) 1971:( 1963:? 1895:( 1880:( 1854:( 1811:( 1793:( 1774:( 1751:( 1739:. 1721:( 1677:( 1652:( 1638:( 1619:( 1599:( 1573:( 1551:( 1526:( 1498:( 1463:( 1445:( 1431:( 1413:( 1391:( 1372:( 1292:( 1237:( 1222:( 1176:· 1171:( 1143:( 1094:( 1081:· 1076:( 1050:( 1032:( 994:( 980:( 966:( 950:( 926:( 871:( 837:( 821:( 752:( 737:( 713:( 699:( 683:( 626:( 601:( 562:( 548:( 534:( 520:( 506:( 492:( 478:( 463:( 448:. 410:( 376:( 364:· 359:( 345:( 331:( 322:· 317:( 308:· 303:( 294:· 289:( 263:( 248:( 239:· 234:( 225:· 220:( 211:· 206:( 176:( 160:( 142:( 126:( 111:( 89:( 74:( 58:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index