677:
the content. I think there's often an imbalance in content because the releases are more easily verified than other details about an artist. All entries should be verifiable - I don't think it's practical to have a citation for all releases (and it would look a bit of a mess), but if any additions can't be verified then I agree that it's reasonable to request a source. Having said that there are some artists for whom I wouldn't attempt to include all singles, because some (e.g. some
Jamaican reggae artists) release dozens a year, the details are often sketchy re. when they were relesased, and it can be very difficult to compile a complete discography. It's generally easy to verify the details of most releases from record company websites, online shops (e.g. Amazon), magazines listing releases (e.g. Billboard, Music Week), Discography books, etc., or the releases themselves if you have them. --
710:(ec) It's tricky. There are some labels for example where there's so much interest (Motown, Creation, etc.) that listing every release is a good thing. There are other labels which may just be slightly over the bar for notability, where listing hundreds of releases would be inappropriate (in my view, but different editors will have different views on which labels are worth going into that much detail), but how you would cover that in a guideline I don't know. Yes, feel free to ask me to look at any specific cases. --
364:
1029:. Even then the article would need to contain sufficient sources that demonstrate that the subject belongs on the list. I would recommend that you firstly wait until you have sufficient coverage available to write a properly sourced article and secondly to wait until the article exists before adding the subject to any lists. There would be no problem adding the band to that list once the article exists with sufficient sourcing. --
650:
Sometimes they seem to be a substantial bulk of material, or percentage of the article. Are all works of every composer, etc., that are reflected on his website or discogs, etc., being listed in the person's article the way to go, even if lengthy? I know that at some point they can qualify for their
605:
There was an edit conflict, so please feel free to restore anything that got lost. More difficult than I expected to find sources. There are varying versions of his birth date, but I went with the most reliable-looking. I would like to see a better source for his death and some of the other details
450:
Hello - sorry for the delay in getting back to you - have been out for a few hours. I'm not sure what's needed here. There was a prod that was removed and a bit of discussion that seems to have come to an end - ordinary discussions on talk pages don't really get closed as RfCs do. Is there anything
676:
I think it's generally encyclopedic content if they are genuine releases (as opposed to
Youtube videos, free download tracks from band websites, etc. - some editors insist on listing all of these as 'singles'). If someone is notable for being a recording artist, then the releases are a key part of
1003:
Tonight I added Final program to the list of bands on the relevant page AND submitted an article linked to that for review, but before the article could be reviewed you have deleted the listing. The reason there are not the references (yet) is because the article has not been reviewed (yet)
691:
Thanks. Is there any limit? What about (I'm sure I've seen these) record labels that want to list all of their recordings? Tx for your lengthy response. For my part I think anything (including recordings) that is questioned/removed under wp:v requires a wp:burden inline RS cite. I would have to
756:
Difficult one for me to comment on as jazz isn't one of my main areas of knowledge. It's possible that there's loads of coverage out there of the label, and that the article could be expanded so that the discography doesn't look so disproportionate. It's possibly one of the genres where print
290:) 17:16, 17 July 2014 (UTC) If you still disagree, feel free to take it out - it's hardly a crucial piece of content, but bear in mind that the article is thin on sourced information and may be more appropriately merged to an article on the album when it comes out if that doesn't change. --
829:
Michig, you recently stated in another discussion QUOTE 'This includes genre-specific charts' note appears to have been added to the guideline without first gaining consensus, so that argument's debatable. END, could you elaborate why the current guidelines appear to be debatable? Thanks.
558:. Just kicked the bucket, according to reports. I've done some clean up, but perhaps you could keep an eye on it, even flesh it out a bit, as I'm sure obits will appear. Question. If there are no other notable Jake Hookers is the (musician) disambig needed?
844:
The content of guidelines should (a) reflect consensus across the project and (b) be agreed on the talk page of the guideline before being added/changed. I couldn't find evidence that either of these applied before someone added that to the guideline.
620:
I'll leave it to you to have your way, at least for now. Essentially I had delinked 'actress/singer' and took divorce out of the 'life' section, since it is in 'family'. I have to admit a COI since I actually roadied for both Streak and Arrows!
331:
Not really a fan of DYK to be honest, but best of luck with it. I doubt that notabledance.com is reliable by the way - it seems to be a blog rather than a professional publication and is blocked as a risky site to visit by my security software.
465:
No, no, no delay; thanks for the reply. Sometimes discussions do get closed as I have seen examples; in this case it would help prevent anybody to try to hit one of the parties again, and -of course- unnecessarily. Never mind, though. Regards.
654:
And sometimes they lack cites -- my view is that if questioned (at minimum) cites are required (for each entry; a "the following is cited 'here' prior to all the entries does not work, as editors add new entries from time to time).
761:
where anything released on the label gets reviewed in jazz sources and where there's a large body of people who will buy anything that's released on the label - I don't know. To be honest I hadn't heard of the label before.
86:
Is not my personal research, nor opinion, but simply informations taken from wikipedia and sources that are presend on wikipedia articles, Extended Play record is smoething different than short album called Mini-Album.
388:
387:, for dealing fairly with articles for deletion, offering help ("He appears to be notable, but the article certainly needs some work. I'll see what I can do ...") and referencing hundreds of BLPs, - you are an
496:, indicating that their eccentrically-naked member's real name is "Pete Vietnamcheque". A) Where did you get this information? B) Are you sure that's not just another ludicrous alias?
1000:
The album has been published in germany as a collectors item for those who recognise the importance of the
Scottish electro movement in setting the direction of minimalist electro.
245:
It's a national newspaper - why would it be an unreliable source for their opinion of a single? If it was being used to source some celebrity gossip or whatever I would agree. --
1007:
Do you really need to delete from the list immediately - is it not possible to actually allow the sources to be published in the reviewed article before you just "delete"
573:
I'll have a look and see if I can find further sources. There's a
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist also named Jake Hooker, so I think we'll need to keep the disambig. --
305:
65:
696:#4 and its application. Can I drop by from time to time if I need your seasoned view, to ask you about specifics? (none in mind at the moment). Many thanks.
974:
If you've seen the AfD discussion then presumably you'll have seen why the article was up for deletion - it's explained clearly enough there I think. --
540:
471:
440:
943:
I was the MD of Rive Doite where I signed
Katherine Jenkins, the company also wrote / produced Enrique, Cher, Kylie etc and was sold for 10 Million.
651:
own article. But I also often see this in articles where the notability of the subject is slim in and of itself, though they qualify as notable.
110:? It's heavily POV-ridden, but I don't want that to distract me from any real notability here, and I know you're a subject matter expert. Tx. --
536:
467:
436:
50:
38:
959:
886:
88:
320:
271:
233:
515:, and if you look again I didn't indicate that that is his real name, I just used 'aka' - I'm sure it is another ludicrous alias. --
143:
A bit later than I had anticipated, but it looks a lot better now I think, and I don't think there's any doubt about notability. --
813:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts#Inclusion_of_Amazon.2C_Spotify.2C_iTunes.2C_Beatport_under_digital_charts
46:
997:
On
October 15th an album launch will take place in London. The band is Final Program, a Scottish Minimalist Electro band.
501:
282:
That's why we need to take care on what we use them as sources for. We're just talking about a reviewer's opinion here. --
904:
The vandalism appears to have stopped now. I will be offline until this evening, so if it restarts please report this to
692:
check as to whether it should be independent (many just refer to their own website). And I would have think harder about
937:
I have managed Asia & Ultravox, was partners with Simon Napier-Bell ( who is currently on the board of my company)
107:
693:
497:
963:
129:. He appears to be notable, but the article certainly needs some work. I'll see what I can do later today. --
880:
378:
92:
66:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Speedy deletion of articles about music and film festivals
955:
555:
399:
315:
266:
228:
199:
178:
I will have a look later if I have time. You may be able to find sources yourself from a Google search. --
169:
876:
835:
819:
894:
890:
733:
701:
666:
374:
115:
588:
1015:
626:
596:
563:
432:
192:
363:
797:
395:
310:
261:
223:
196:
166:
1026:
1034:
979:
913:
850:
831:
815:
790:
767:
747:
715:
682:
611:
578:
520:
456:
416:
337:
295:
287:
250:
183:
148:
134:
17:
905:
729:
697:
662:
111:
42:
31:
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at
Village pump by
1011:
622:
592:
559:
493:
218:
69:
647:
Hi Michig. What is your view on directories of works or recordings? Two questions.
64:
Hi Michig. Just to let you know, I mentioned one of your declined speedy deletions at
869:
Sir I request a protection on the above page. Ip users are reali vandalizing it. See
211:
535:
Thanks for finding sources. (I was not here for the last five years. :-) Regards. --
812:
793:
725:
1038:
1019:
983:
967:
917:
898:
854:
839:
823:
801:
771:
751:
737:
719:
705:
686:
670:
630:
615:
600:
582:
567:
544:
524:
505:
475:
460:
444:
420:
403:
341:
326:
299:
277:
254:
239:
202:
187:
172:
152:
138:
119:
96:
76:
54:
1030:
975:
909:
863:
846:
763:
758:
743:
711:
678:
607:
574:
516:
452:
412:
333:
291:
283:
246:
179:
144:
130:
946:
To be on the stock
Exchange and the CEO everything you say or do is verified.
165:
I would appreciate if you could improve the article, lest I take it to AFD.
1025:
It is usual to create an article before adding the subject to a list - see
587:
There also appears to be another Jake Hooker musician. Allmusic has them
724:
I glanced around -- an example, in the world of record labels, would be
33:
757:
coverage far outweighs what can be found online. It may be similar to
940:
I am the CEO of a stock market listed company Papa
Entertainment PLC
221:
to be unreliable. Why did you revert my removal of it as a source?--
1010:
I am not trying to be difficult here - just to make a contribution.
259:
It is also a tabloid, and they aren't very good at fact-checking.--
125:
I've had a quick look and found coverage from
Allmusic, XLR8R, and
511:
As indicated in the edit, this came from Martin C. Strong's
606:
need to be sourced but I'll keep an eye out for obits. --
872:
489:
383:
791:
User_talk:J_1982#please_make_a_genuine_attempt_in_AfDs
304:
You may be interested in the article's DYK nomination
106:
Hi ... if you have a moment, could you take a look at
811:
You might be interested in this discussion/proposal
435:which I believe has come to its end. Thanks. --
8:
875:. I suggest immediate block of this Ip user
377:of Caribbean music and its people, such as
934:Not sure why you are trying to delete me.
195:and found nothing to indicate notability.
554:Hi Michig, Can I bring your attention to
41:is very much appreciated. Many thanks.
658:Would be interested in your thoughts.
7:
24:
949:What is your problem with me.??
362:
1039:06:11, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
1020:23:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
984:14:39, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
968:13:23, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
537:Why should I have a User Name?
468:Why should I have a User Name?
437:Why should I have a User Name?
431:Hello. Would you mind closing
1:
918:06:12, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
899:03:23, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
855:18:51, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
840:18:05, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
824:13:53, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
802:12:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
772:20:32, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
752:20:14, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
738:20:10, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
720:20:14, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
706:20:00, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
687:19:54, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
671:19:34, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
513:The Great Indie Discography
1055:
631:07:42, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
616:07:18, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
601:06:40, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
583:06:19, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
568:05:44, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
545:06:37, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
108:Charles Webster (musician)
60:Speedys of music festivals
47:MediaWiki message delivery
525:05:53, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
506:01:42, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
476:12:13, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
461:12:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
445:08:41, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
421:11:59, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
404:07:55, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
342:20:12, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
327:20:05, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
300:17:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
278:17:10, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
255:16:59, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
240:16:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
203:10:04, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
188:09:40, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
173:09:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
153:09:44, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
139:09:39, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
120:07:42, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
370:"I'll see what I can do"
97:09:01, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
77:20:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
55:06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
952:Kindest, Harry Cowell
379:Visions of Dennis Brown
556:Jake Hooker (musician)
384:adding infoboxes early
786:you may be interested
484:Naming the unnameable
451:you need me to do? --
217:I had always thought
742:I'll take a look. --
490:expanded the article
531:English Summer Rain
161:The Ghost Frequency
27:Request for comment
389:awesome Wikipedian
958:comment added by
75:
1046:
970:
874:
694:wp:NOTADIRECTORY
386:
366:
325:
323:
318:
313:
276:
274:
269:
264:
238:
236:
231:
226:
74:
72:
37:. Your comments
36:
18:User talk:Michig
1054:
1053:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1045:
1044:
1043:
992:
953:
926:
870:
867:
809:
788:
645:
552:
550:Jake Hooker RIP
533:
486:
433:this discussion
429:
408:
407:
382:
367:
358:
321:
316:
311:
309:
272:
267:
262:
260:
234:
229:
224:
222:
215:
163:
104:
84:
70:
62:
32:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1052:
1050:
1042:
1041:
991:
988:
987:
986:
925:
922:
921:
920:
866:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
808:
805:
787:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
774:
754:
644:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
551:
548:
532:
529:
528:
527:
485:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
428:
425:
424:
423:
372:
361:
360:
359:
357:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
219:The Daily Star
214:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
162:
159:
158:
157:
156:
155:
103:
100:
83:
80:
61:
58:
34:Anna Frodesiak
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1051:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1008:
1005:
1001:
998:
995:
990:Final Program
989:
985:
981:
977:
973:
972:
971:
969:
965:
961:
960:86.140.236.34
957:
950:
947:
944:
941:
938:
935:
932:
931:Have we met?
929:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
903:
902:
901:
900:
896:
892:
888:
885:
882:
878:
877:75.145.18.186
873:
865:
862:
856:
852:
848:
843:
842:
841:
837:
833:
828:
827:
826:
825:
821:
817:
814:
806:
804:
803:
799:
795:
792:
785:
773:
769:
765:
760:
755:
753:
749:
745:
741:
740:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
722:
721:
717:
713:
709:
708:
707:
703:
699:
695:
690:
689:
688:
684:
680:
675:
674:
673:
672:
668:
664:
659:
656:
652:
648:
642:
632:
628:
624:
619:
618:
617:
613:
609:
604:
603:
602:
598:
594:
590:
586:
585:
584:
580:
576:
572:
571:
570:
569:
565:
561:
557:
549:
547:
546:
542:
538:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
509:
508:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
488:In 2009, you
483:
477:
473:
469:
464:
463:
462:
458:
454:
449:
448:
447:
446:
442:
438:
434:
426:
422:
418:
414:
411:Thank you. --
410:
409:
406:
405:
401:
397:
392:
390:
385:
380:
376:
375:master editor
371:
365:
355:
343:
339:
335:
330:
329:
328:
324:
319:
314:
307:
303:
302:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
280:
279:
275:
270:
265:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
244:
243:
242:
241:
237:
232:
227:
220:
213:
212:Make U Bounce
210:
204:
201:
198:
194:
191:
190:
189:
185:
181:
177:
176:
175:
174:
171:
168:
160:
154:
150:
146:
142:
141:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
123:
122:
121:
117:
113:
109:
102:Have a moment
101:
99:
98:
94:
90:
89:83.13.239.255
81:
79:
78:
73:
67:
59:
57:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
35:
26:
19:
1009:
1006:
1002:
999:
996:
994:Dear Michig
993:
954:— Preceding
951:
948:
945:
942:
939:
936:
933:
930:
927:
924:Harry Cowell
908:. Thanks. --
883:
871:this History
868:
810:
789:
726:Enja Records
660:
657:
653:
649:
646:
553:
534:
512:
487:
430:
396:Gerda Arendt
393:
369:
368:
216:
164:
126:
105:
85:
63:
30:
864:Betty White
832:prokaryotes
816:prokaryotes
759:ECM Records
643:Works, etc.
373:Thank you,
68:. Regards,
928:Hi there,
891:Wikicology
730:Epeefleche
698:Epeefleche
663:Epeefleche
427:Discussion
112:Epeefleche
43:Jim Carter
1012:Mursillis
807:Re charts
623:Wwwhatsup
593:Wwwhatsup
589:conflated
560:Wwwhatsup
71:Paul Erik
956:unsigned
887:contribs
356:Precious
45:through
1027:WP:WTAF
794:LibStar
494:Dwarves
200:Snowman
170:Snowman
1031:Michig
976:Michig
910:Michig
906:WP:AIV
847:Michig
764:Michig
744:Michig
712:Michig
679:Michig
661:Tx. --
608:Michig
575:Michig
517:Michig
453:Michig
413:Michig
381:, for
334:Michig
292:Michig
284:Michig
247:Michig
180:Michig
145:Michig
131:Michig
197:Giant
193:I did
167:Giant
127:UNCUT
16:<
1035:talk
1016:talk
980:talk
964:talk
914:talk
895:talk
881:talk
851:talk
836:talk
820:talk
798:talk
768:talk
748:talk
734:talk
716:talk
702:talk
683:talk
667:talk
627:talk
612:talk
597:talk
579:talk
564:talk
541:talk
521:talk
502:talk
472:talk
457:talk
441:talk
417:talk
400:talk
338:talk
322:ller
317:chba
312:Laun
306:here
296:talk
288:talk
273:ller
268:chba
263:Laun
251:talk
235:ller
230:chba
225:Laun
184:talk
149:talk
135:talk
116:talk
93:talk
51:talk
39:here
591:..
492:on
308:.--
1037:)
1018:)
982:)
966:)
916:)
897:)
889:)
853:)
845:--
838:)
822:)
800:)
770:)
762:--
750:)
736:)
728:.
718:)
704:)
685:)
669:)
629:)
614:)
599:)
581:)
566:)
543:)
523:)
504:)
498:DS
474:)
466:--
459:)
443:)
419:)
402:)
394:--
391:!
340:)
332:--
298:)
253:)
186:)
151:)
137:)
118:)
95:)
82:EP
53:)
1033:(
1014:(
978:(
962:(
912:(
893:(
884:·
879:(
849:(
834:(
818:(
796:(
766:(
746:(
732:(
714:(
700:(
681:(
665:(
625:(
610:(
595:(
577:(
562:(
539:(
519:(
500:(
470:(
455:(
439:(
415:(
398:(
336:(
294:(
286:(
249:(
182:(
147:(
133:(
114:(
91:(
49:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.