729:
You need to bring facts to back up your claims and complaints - and you need to do this detective work yourself; don't expect someone else to find evidence to help you, because no one cares. The way I see it, you're not playing your cards right at all. You went in, barging in like a bull in a china shop, accused other users of being affiliated to the former royal family and, even if your intentions might have been good, you didn't offer something new to the discussion. Where are the citations? The references? The secondary sources? You did a very poor job of improving the articles you were involved in and I don't want to become "collateral damage" just because you angered someone, causing him to start thinking that you may be controlling other accounts as well. The way I see it, even though you might have had good intentions, your contribution was not constructive. Much as I don't like the fact that I was not contacted by any party that might have felt
613:
editing history (I saw that one of the users I am accused of being had edited several entries 6 years ago, long before I created a proper account - until that time, I was experimenting in the
Sandbox as a mere IP editor, trying to learn the ropes before committing to become a Wikipedian). Oh, and discussing with the "Bougatsa42" user once (and even agreeing with him) does not make me the same person as him. Furthermore, I have contributed numerous other edits to all sorts of different articles, ranging from passenger aircraft to computers and from music to dogs. I also would like to point out that my main interest is copyediting, perhaps much more so than anything else.
259:
303:
211:
160:
564:
67:
in an article, I immediately will start to wonder if the person has any connection with the subject of the article. So, I'm going to google his or her username, especially if that username happens to look like a real-world name. And if I see this exact real-world name being connected with the subject
728:
You really don't understand the mentality here, do you? With this confrontational attitude, you're not going anywhere. On the internet, one of the oldest truisms is that the oldtimer is always right and there's very little leniency towards newcomers, especially if they appear to be confrontational.
638:
entry. Read my contemporaneous edit of that article's talk page (which is clear evidence of my awareness of that article and the COI issue brought up by other editors regarding a former employee of the company, who served as a single-purpose account with the sole intention of editing that particular
612:
article, I'm accused of being a puppet? Greece has at least a million internet users. Many are active in discussions regarding the far-right (a part of the political spectrum that I detest). The evidence is, at best, circumstantial. I don't know the users you are referring to and am unaware of their
96:
violation and the arbitrator in question has proven to be utterly inept at arbitrating, since he (or she) has failed to investigate matters, has taken someone's words at face value without doing the slightest bit of research to see what's going on in the dispute at hand and has been tricked into an
390:
I'm not surprised by the number of recorded typos. We have editors of varying levels of proficiency in the
English language, which I think could explain a significant percentage of the spelling and grammar errors. Then we have simple typos... There are many occasions in which I wish I could find
37:) by a few "select" editors who, in real life, are well-known and self-confessed members and supporters of the articles' subject, but, in a blatant display of dishonesty, choose to hide this fact from other editors, administrators and arbitrators, thus violating
709:
I think you are being very stupid. It is quite clear that there are people out there trying to make sure there own version of events gets across, and will stop at nothing to ensure this. Trying to make me look bad only plays their game.
686:
I'm not attacking you, I'm separating my position from yours. There's a rather thick and visible line between these two things. I don't know how you acted in that dispute you had with the other guy. I don't know how he acted. What I
633:
made in reference to Takis
Fotopoulos (of whom I have no knowledge whatsoever, therefore I can have no opinion on - be it negative or positive), but in reference to conclusions I reached by reading (and editing) the
655:
article on 12:44, 4 April 2012 and edited my profile to reflect the opinion I formed based on what I saw there on the same day, between 21:25 and 22:33. The evidence is all right there on my user contributions.
375:
I try to do my best. Did you know there are more then 200,000 recorded typos in the articles? I've got a bunch of flagged false positives for names and foreign words, but I'm not infallible as you see.
391:
someone with greater knowledge on an article's subject matter or with a better grasp of the
English language than me to cross-check for factual accuracy, spelling, syntax or even wording.
577:
581:
512:
meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on
Knowledge (XXG). You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse
121:
276:
426:
532:
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the
Teahouse!
466:
651:
a dispute of other users on a person I have no knowledge of and no opinion on. The time stamps confirm it, too: I edited the talk page of the
422:
671:
It doesn't seem right to me, for you to attack and blame a fellow defendant, who is just trying to defend himself, but then, what do I know?
462:
442:
438:
640:
513:
310:
302:
218:
210:
167:
159:
419:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
135:. The Teahouse is a welcoming place for new and experienced editors to ask questions about Knowledge (XXG)! Please join us!
517:
33:
There are articles here on
Knowledge (XXG) that are controlled in an incredibly strict manner (verging on violation of
416:
318:
226:
194:
175:
573:
552:
381:
351:
746:
734:
692:
657:
614:
392:
362:
326:
287:
265:
258:
140:
98:
46:
733:
actions were wrong, I have to point out that you didn't behave properly and immediately jumped the gun.
545:
179:
68:
of the article in question, then I will have every reason to believe that there is a clear violation of
706:
You're saying one that I deliberately created this mess, and two that I am deliberately involving you.
596:
I read the case. So, just because I'm Greek, opinionated and happen to have worked (with such users as
505:
132:
718:
676:
112:
Welcome to
Knowledge (XXG)! Drop by the Teahouse anytime for a cup of tea, or some help with editing!
377:
347:
330:
490:
322:
283:
136:
525:
509:
93:
42:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
64:
60:
38:
34:
26:
714:
672:
237:
601:
538:
481:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
458:
652:
644:
635:
486:
482:
754:
722:
700:
680:
665:
639:
article) and you'll see exactly what I'm referring to. So, in other words, it was
622:
590:
494:
400:
385:
370:
355:
291:
272:
241:
198:
144:
120:
106:
54:
605:
563:
84:
has misled
Knowledge (XXG) arbitrators to punish those who have pointed out the
585:
232:
691:
know is that I found myself involved in a mess that I never participated in.
609:
597:
713:
Frankly, at the moment I feel that I have blundered into a lunatic asylum.
473:
434:
415:
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to
131:, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the
361:
Thank you. Both for trying to improve the article and for the fix.
309:
Hello, Moderatelyaverage. Your question has been answered at the
217:
Hello, Moderatelyaverage. Your question has been answered at the
166:
Hello, Moderatelyaverage. Your question has been answered at the
449:
580:
for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with
337:
at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
248:
at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
205:
at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
578:
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/SentientContrarian
504:
Hello fellow
Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at
301:
279:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
257:
209:
158:
41:. Editors of this kind often have a propensity to violate
334:
245:
202:
264:Hello, Moderatelyaverage. You have new messages at
97:
unfair decision. Sorry, but that's the way it is. --
572:Your name has been mentioned in connection with a
508:would like your feedback! We have created a brief
76:at the same time. And if the person that violates
21:This user is no longer active on Knowledge (XXG).
629:Also, on my references to the WP:COI, they were
500:Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey
321:after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by
229:after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by
178:after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by
63:issue, when I see an editor clearly violating
411:Disambiguation link notification for April 28
8:
520:pages sometime in the last few months.
317:Please note that all old questions are
297:Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
225:Please note that all old questions are
174:Please note that all old questions are
7:
584:before editing the evidence page.
14:
45:, if it suits their "mission". --
643:section in the talk page of the
582:the guide to responding to cases
562:
119:
92:violations, then we also have a
528:to be taken to the survey site.
741:) 22:01, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
296:
1:
558:
548:on 00:36, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
755:23:39, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
723:21:57, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
701:21:16, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
681:21:13, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
666:19:22, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
623:18:56, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
591:14:04, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
313:. Feel free to reply there!
221:. Feel free to reply there!
170:. Feel free to reply there!
771:
544:This message was sent via
495:10:50, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
401:18:56, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
386:15:48, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
371:14:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
356:14:41, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
331:16:45, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
292:14:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
273:14:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
242:11:51, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
199:11:07, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
154:Teahouse question answered
59:Getting back on the whole
472:added a link pointing to
448:added a link pointing to
346:I've fixed the 'merida'.
145:19:59, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
107:12:34, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
55:21:24, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
750:
738:
696:
661:
618:
608:article, as well as the
396:
366:
266:SarahStierch's talk page
102:
50:
546:Global message delivery
576:case. Please refer to
311:Teahouse Q&A board
306:
262:
219:Teahouse Q&A board
214:
168:Teahouse Q&A board
163:
305:
261:
213:
162:
483:opt-out instructions
417:disambiguation pages
467:fix with Dab solver
443:fix with Dab solver
29:on certain articles
425:• Join us at the
335:remove this notice
307:
277:remove this notice
263:
246:remove this notice
215:
203:remove this notice
164:
747:Moderatelyaverage
735:Moderatelyaverage
693:Moderatelyaverage
658:Moderatelyaverage
615:Moderatelyaverage
589:
570:
569:
541:, Teahouse host
430:
393:Moderatelyaverage
363:Moderatelyaverage
151:
150:
129:Moderatelyaverage
99:Moderatelyaverage
47:Moderatelyaverage
17:Moderatelyaverage
762:
588:
566:
559:
535:Happy editing,
463:check to confirm
439:check to confirm
420:
338:
280:
249:
235:
206:
192:
188:
187:
123:
116:
115:
18:
770:
769:
765:
764:
763:
761:
760:
759:
557:
502:
427:DPL WikiProject
413:
344:
339:
316:
299:
281:
270:
255:
250:
230:
224:
207:
190:
181:
180:
173:
156:
147:
114:
31:
22:
19:
16:
12:
11:
5:
768:
766:
758:
757:
704:
703:
669:
668:
626:
625:
568:
567:
556:
550:
501:
498:
479:
478:
477:
476:
455:
454:
453:
452:
412:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
378:ChrisGualtieri
348:ChrisGualtieri
343:
340:
315:
300:
298:
295:
271:Message added
269:
256:
254:
251:
223:
208:
172:
157:
155:
152:
149:
148:
126:
124:
113:
110:
30:
23:
20:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
767:
756:
752:
748:
744:
740:
736:
732:
727:
726:
725:
724:
720:
716:
711:
707:
702:
698:
694:
690:
685:
684:
683:
682:
678:
674:
667:
663:
659:
654:
650:
646:
642:
637:
632:
628:
627:
624:
620:
616:
611:
607:
603:
602:User:Dolescum
599:
595:
594:
593:
592:
587:
583:
579:
575:
565:
561:
560:
554:
551:
549:
547:
542:
540:
536:
533:
530:
529:
527:
521:
519:
515:
511:
507:
499:
497:
496:
492:
488:
484:
475:
471:
470:
468:
464:
460:
459:Steve Rothery
457:
456:
451:
447:
446:
444:
440:
436:
433:
432:
431:
428:
424:
418:
410:
402:
398:
394:
389:
388:
387:
383:
379:
374:
373:
372:
368:
364:
360:
359:
358:
357:
353:
349:
341:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
314:
312:
304:
294:
293:
289:
285:
278:
274:
267:
260:
252:
247:
243:
239:
234:
228:
222:
220:
212:
204:
200:
196:
189:
186:
185:
177:
171:
169:
161:
153:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
125:
122:
118:
117:
111:
109:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
66:
62:
57:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
28:
24:
742:
730:
712:
708:
705:
688:
670:
653:Saint-Gobain
648:
647:article and
645:Saint-Gobain
636:Saint-Gobain
630:
574:sockpuppetry
571:
553:Sockpuppetry
543:
537:
534:
531:
523:
522:
503:
480:
414:
345:
323:SarahStierch
308:
282:
216:
183:
182:
165:
128:
58:
32:
606:Golden Dawn
506:WP:Teahouse
333:. (You can
244:. (You can
201:. (You can
715:Bougatsa42
673:Bougatsa42
485:. Thanks,
275:. You can
25:Regarding
743:Last edit
610:Meligalas
604:) on the
598:User:RJFF
514:Questions
421:Read the
474:Takamine
435:Souvlaki
319:archived
253:Talkback
227:archived
176:archived
133:Teahouse
487:DPL bot
127:Hello!
94:WP:GAME
43:WP:GAME
524:Click
518:Guests
510:survey
90:WP:OWN
86:WP:COI
82:WP:COI
78:WP:OWN
74:WP:OWN
70:WP:COI
65:WP:OWN
61:WP:COI
39:WP:COI
35:WP:OWN
27:WP:COI
586:Δρ.Κ.
284:Sarah
233:Trevj
137:Sarah
751:talk
739:talk
719:talk
697:talk
677:talk
662:talk
641:this
619:talk
600:and
555:case
539:J-Mo
526:here
491:talk
450:Lamb
397:talk
382:talk
367:talk
352:talk
327:talk
288:talk
238:talk
195:talk
184:Worm
141:talk
103:talk
88:and
80:and
72:and
51:talk
745:by
649:not
631:not
516:or
423:FAQ
342:Fix
231:--
753:)
731:my
721:)
699:)
689:do
679:)
664:)
621:)
493:)
469:)
465:|
445:)
441:|
399:)
384:)
369:)
354:)
329:)
290:)
240:)
197:)
143:)
105:)
53:)
749:(
737:(
717:(
695:(
675:(
660:(
617:(
489:(
461:(
437:(
429:.
395:(
380:(
365:(
350:(
325:(
286:(
268:.
236:(
193:(
191:·
139:(
101:(
49:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
